Regulatory Guide 1.3: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML13350A383
| number = ML003739601
| issue date = 06/30/1973
| issue date = 06/30/1974
| title = Assumptions Used for Evaluation the Potential Radiological Consequences of a Loss Coolant Accident for Boiling Water Reactor
| title = Assumptions Used for Evaluating the Potential Radiological Consequences of a Loss of Coolant Accident for Boiling Water Reactors
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
| author affiliation = NRC/RES
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
| addressee affiliation =  
| addressee affiliation =  
Line 10: Line 10:
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| case reference number = RG-1.003, Rev 1
| document report number = RG-1.3, Rev 2
| document type = Regulatory Guide
| document type = Regulatory Guide
| page count = 12
| page count = 12
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:.!aRevision 1PU.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSIONREGULATORYDIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDSRevision IJune 1973GUIDEREGULATORY GUIDE 1.3ASSUMPTIONS USED FOR EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCESOF A LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT FOR BOILING WATER REACTORS'
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
REGULATORY
DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDS
Revision 2 June 1974 GUIDE
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.3 ASSUMPTIONS USED FOR EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES
OF A LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT FOR BOILING WATER REACTORS


==A. INTRODUCTION==
==A. INTRODUCTION==
S.'i'Cllil 50..;,I fI I('FR PlaII 50( eiliuir ls th:t each:1pl'icailll l a ,oittl t lrlic n pli ltm l ilil or olperaling 'ro',idtc an :!lhlvsis mtid evahaltion ol" the design andpl' ci; Iiiice of1 sitlicitlres. anld Components ofihtc I:,,iility with the otive t" assessing the risk tolputllic h10:1t ll :aitd -:lfelv resl frm Im , oporation ol'thelaTilily. "h" de:;ipi basis loss (of' coolant accidentl()C' A i5 )IliC ,I I p[st lat3ted accidents used 1oevaluate fil ade(l'iacv ofi these Sliltctures. s. andc..'tIIIpolt0elli s will lrespecl It tile public health safely.This Inidle -,i\'es :,ccepltble assumlptions lhat mavy beiseal ill eva\tial l- tihe radiological ctnsequcuces of' thisaccident for a boiling wlei leactor. Ill soniLC CLasCs,ntiitsnltal site chlaractelrisltics. plant dest;i featlres. orothlr li' l tolls nav:y retqglire dilferetit asstinlotionls w\hichwiill ble Ctiside Led on anl illtividulial case basis. TheAdvisoty ('Cimmnitee Oil Reactor S:ile'quards hias been.consul ted con:ernini lt is guide altnd has conceturred in tlieregulatorvy pl ýili inl.
Section 50.34 of 10 CFR Part 50 requires that each applicant for a construction permit or operating license provide an analysis and evaluation of the design and performance of structures, systems, and components of the facility with the objective of assessing the risk to public health and safety resulting from operation of the facility. The design basis loss of coolant accident (LOCA) is one of the postulated accidents used to evaluate the adequacy of these structures, systems, and components with respect to the public health and safety.
 
This guide gives acceptable assumptions that may be used in evaluating the radiological consequences of this accident for a boiling water reactor. In some cases, unusual site characteristics, plant design features, or other factors may require different assumptions which will be considered on an individual case basis. The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has been consulted concerning this guide and has concurred in the regulatory position.


==B. DISCUSSION==
==B. DISCUSSION==
Arler reviewtitt a titinumber or" applicationls forconslitiet iin ,t nuits mnd opetating licenses for boilingwater reacolos. tile AEIC Regulaltury staff hasdeveloped a rilniber ofl' appropriately conservaliveal, ptinons. bliscd on en&inecring juidpneni and onapplicable eXperimnenltal results fromn sa 'ty researchprogratus cndudcted by the AEC and(l tie nuclearindustryv. that are used ti) evaluale calculalions of tlieradiological consequetces of1 various postulatedaccidelel s.This guide lists acceptable assumptions that may heu-sed to evalutate the design basis LOCA of' a BoilinlgWa enr Rcactor (IIWPR). It should be shown tlhal tlhetc.,lose cotnsequences will be within the guidelinesof I(I CFR Part 100.
After reviewing a number of applications for construction permits and operating licenses for boiling water power reactors, the AEC Regulatory staff has developed a number of appropriately conservative assumptions, based on engineering judgment and on applicable experimental results from safety research programs conducted by the AEC and the nuclear industry, that are used to evaluate calculations of the diological consequences of various postulated accidents.
 
This guide lists acceptable assumptions that may be used to evaluate the design basis LOCA of a Boiling Water Reactor (BWR). It should be shown that the offsite dose consequences will be within the guidelines of 10 CFR Part 100. (During the construction permit review, guideline, exposures of 20 rem whole body and
150 rem thyroid should be used rather than the values given in § 100.11 in order to allow for (a) uncertainties in final design details and meteorology or (b) new data and calculational techniques that might influence the final design of engineered safety features or the dose reduction factors allowed for these features.)


==C. REGULATORY POSITION==
==C. REGULATORY POSITION==
I. aIlle ,ssutllptiotis elatied I ll lte tcle:se o' l;ldia:lct iiiilellit l front1 th11 f0 I andl collt iilnltiill alle ;as I",lfows:a. "\'i- t l >y-f'ive percent, of tile equilih)iilutnradioactive iodine invetn tory fromt mia\ iliintt!'uitl pow'er opeiatioi of thie core slhuhld IV JssI.niCId 1)he imtncdililely available I'Mti leakaue fioin the primar:iyvreactor conttaiinment. Nine tV-mit percent ito this 2perceill is to Ile assulmled ito he ill tile 'orto of'ei nlenialiodine. 5 percent of' this 25 percent ill ilic ltOnn oIparticulate ioidine. and -I p't.eent of this 25 percinti it!lhe l'orit of' orwanic iodides.h. One hluldred percent o1' the eqLlihibritinltradioaclive nhble gas itnVentorny developed Ir'omllIltaxitiltilM frill powver of' [lie %:oie should bleassumed it) lb ie tltedialtelv available lot hcakane It'oittle leactol Coll lailllltent.c. The .os tf' radiolo-ical deca, during holdupinl thle conwaiintient or othet bujildimes should ble taketninto accounltI.d. 'File reductiotn ill (hle alotii titt ' adioactivemtat.'rial :ivailfable for leaka! ito the ehnvironineut bvCloln[;,ilmllelln Spray'. recirtuilaing filter ni olhiereneih:eered sai'eity ftatlres mtay be takelil itlno :icclittl,bill the atounit of' reduction ihi concrentiation ofradioactive materiils shotuld be evtlualed on :anildividual case ba:sis.e. Tile primary conllaitnitent should ble assumed toleak at the leak rate incorporated or tio hie incolporatedin thie technical specifications f'or the duration ill' [lieacciden The shotild be assuiited ito passt"'l'iS guiidte is a revision Sate \l Giuide 3.2'lic on containni ent leakaee Iindcr atccid.nlconditio ot" I'e:ttlires protvidted to red ilce t' t':lkatpie of"radioalclive rtatlritits I'roll ItI" t'(l tnlit1inn n Will 11C he' eV3 litt 1 Lilt:nil individual case USAEC REGULATORY GUIDES Copies of published guides may he obtained by reqcuest indicating the. divisionsdeilred to the US. Atomic Energy Commisvon. Washington, D.C. 201545.Rcgulatnry Guides are issued in describe and make available to the public Attention; Director of Regulatory Stalndards. Comments and suggestion% lotmethods accptablte to the AEC Regulatory staff of implementing specilit part- of itiproverienti In theta guidemý ace ancouragd and should be sent to the Secretarythe regulations. tO delineale techniques used by the staff in of the Commitsion, US. Atomic Energy Commission. Washington, D.C. 20545.ealuating specific problems or postulated accidents, or to provide guidence to Attention: Chief, Public Proo-redinga Staff.applkOjlnts. Reoualo.yi Guides are not substitutes for regulations and compliancewith them is not requited. Mrthods and solutions different from those set out in The guides are itsuedt in the fortlowing ten broad divisior.:the u.-ris will be acceptahle it they provide a basis for the findings requisite tothe llluance or osntinuance of a permit or licante by the Commission. 1. Power Reactors 6. Products2. Research and Test Reactors 7. 'Transrptortation3. Fuels and Materials Facilities B. Occullationl HeialthPuhllshM quiewi will hbe revi-id periodically, as aip!iogilate. to accommodate 4. Environmental ard Siting 9. Antitrust Reviewcornrmenit 4nd in reflect new informatint, or experience. S. Materials and Plant Protection tO, General
1. The assumptions related to the release of radioactive material from the fuel and containment are as follows:  
----I *directly to the emergency exhaust system withoutmixing' in the. surrounding reactor building atmosphereand should then be assumed to be released as an elevatedplume for those facilities with stacks.4f. No credit should be given for retention ofiodine in the suppression pool.2. Acceptable assumptions for atmospheric diffusionand dose conversion are:a. Elevated releases should be considered to be ata height equal to no more than the actual stack height.Certain site dependent conditions may exist, such assurrounding elevated topography or nearby stnictureswhich will have the effect of reducing the actual stackheight. The degree of stack height reduction should beevaluated on an individual case hasis. Also. specialmeleorologicaI and geographical conditions may existwhich can contribute to greater ground levelconcentrations in the immediate neighborhood of astack. For example. fumigation should always beassumed to occur: however. tlh- length of time that arumigation condition exists is strongly dependent ongeographical and seasonal factors and should beevaluated on a case-by-case basis." (See Figures I Athrough ID for atmospheric diffusion factors for anelcvated release with fumigation.)b. No correction should be made for depletion ofthe effluent plume of radioactive iodine due todeposition on the ground. or for the radiological decayof iodine in transit.c. For the first 8 hours, the breathing rate ofpersons offsite should be assumed to be 3.47x 10'cubic meters per second. From 8 to 24 hours followingthe accident, the breathing rate should be assumed to be1.75 x 104 cubic meters per second, After that until theend of the accident, the rate should be assumed to be2.32 x 10-4 cubic meters per second. (These values weredeveloped from the average daily breathing rate 12 x 107cm3/dayl assumed in the report of ICRP, Committee11-1959.)31n some c-ases, credit fur mixing will he allowed: however.the amount of credit allowed will be evaluated on an individualcase basis."Credit for an elevated release should be given only if thepitnt of release is (I) nire than two and one-half times theheight of any structure close enough to afrect the dispersion ofthe plume, or (2) located far enough from any structure whichcould have an efrect on the dispersion of the plume. For thoseIt\R's without stacks the atmospheric diffusion factorsassuming pround level release given in section 2.h. should be usedto determine site acceptability.For sites located more than 2 miles from large bodies ofwater such as oceans or one of (the Great takes. a fumigationcondition should be assumed to exist at the time of the accidentand continue for one-half hour. For sites located less than 2miles from large bodies of water, a fumigation condition shouldbe assumed to exist at the time of the accident and continue for4 hours.d. The iodine dose conversion factors are given inICRP Publication 2, Report of Comtmittee i1."Permissible Dose for Internal Radiation." 1959.e. External whole body doses should be calculatedusing Infinite Cloud" assumptions. i.e.. the dimensionsof the cloud are assumed to be large compared to ihedistance Ihat Ihic gamma rays and beta particles travel."Such a cloud would be considered atn infinite cloud fora receptor at the center because any additional (gammaandi beta emitting material beyond t(le clotuddimensions would not alter the flux of Igatmna raysandl beta particles to the receptor" (Meteorology andAtomic Energy, Section 7.4.1.1-editorial additionsmade so that gamnma and beta emitting material could beconsidered). Under ihese conditions the rate of energy.absorption per unit volume is equal to the rate ortenergyreleased per unit volume. For an infinite uniform cloudcontaining X curies of beta radioactivity per cubic meterthe beta dose in air at the cloud center is:D. = 0.457 EThe surface body dose rate from beta emitters in theinfinite cloud can be approximated as being one-half thisamount (i.e.. 01D- = 0.23 EOX).For gamma emitting material the dose rate in air at thecloud center is:DA= 0.507 E rXFrom a semi-infinite cloud. the gamma dose rate in airis:S=o.2s ExWhereD= beta dose rate from an infinite cloud (rad/sec)DE= gamma dose rate from an infimite cloud(rad/sec)EO = average beta energy per disintegration(Mev/dis)Ei = average gamma energy per disintegration(Mevldis)X = concentration of beta or gatnma emittingisotope in the cloud (curie/mr3)f. The following specific assumptions areacceptable with respect to the radioactive cloud dosecalculations:(I) The dose at any distance from the reactorshould be calculated based on the maximunmconcentration in the plume at that distance taking intoaccount specific meteorological, topographical, andother characteristics which may affect the maximiumplume concentration. These site related characteristics1.3-2 must be evaluated on an individual case basis. In the caseof beta radiation, the receptor is assumed to be exposedto an infinite cloud at the maxinmum ground levelconcentration at that distance from the reactor. In thecase of gamma radiation, the receptor is assumed to beexposed to only one-half the ckud owing to tciepresence of' the ground. Tile maxinmm cloudconcentration always should be assumed to be at groundlevel.(2) The appropriate average beta and gamniaenergies emitted per disintegration, as given in the Tableof Isotopes. Sixth Edition, by C. M. Lederer. J. M.Hollander, I. Perhlan; University ofCalifornia. Berkeley:Lawrence Radiation Laboratory: should be used.g. For BWR's with stacks the atmosphericdiffusion model should be as follows:(I) The basic equation for atmosphericdiffusion from an elevated release is:exp(-h2/2Oz 2)VQ Tu y 0zWherex = the short term average centerline value of theground level concentration (curie/meter3)Q = amount of material released (curie/see)u = windspeed (meter/sec)Gy = the horizontal standard deviation of theplume (meters) [See Figure V-i. Page 48.Nuclear Safety, June 1961, Volume 2.Number 4, "Use of Routine MeteorologicalObservations for Estimating AtmosphericDispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.)z= the vertical standard deviation of the plume(meters) [See Figure V-2. Page 48, NuclearSafety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4,"Use of Routine MeteorologicalObservations for Estimating AtmosphericDispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.)h = effective height of release (meters)(2) For time periods of greater than 8 hoursthe plume from an elevated release should be assumed tomeander and spread uniformly over a 22.50 sector. Theresultant equation is:2.032 exp(-h2/2oz2)x/Q =Wherex = distance from the release point (meters);other variables are as given in g(1).(3) The atmospheric diffuision model' for anelevated release as a function of the distance from thereactor, is based on the information in the table below.TimeFollowingAccidentAtmospheric Conditions0-8 hours See Figure 1(A) Envelope o1" Pastluilldiffusion categories based oil Figure A7NI 'teorolog' and Atomic I-netryo I tt(,1 ,assuming various stack heights: vindspeed Ime ier/see; uniform direction.8-24 hours See Figure ItB) lEnvelope of Pasquilldiffusion categories: windspeed I meter/see:variable direction within a 22.5 sector.1-4 days See Figure I[C) Envulope of Pasquilldiffusion categories with the followingrelationship used to represent maximnnumnplume concentrations as a tumeltion of'distance:Atmospheric Condition Case I40Y Pasquill A601'} Pasquill CAtmospheric Condition Case 250% Pasquill CPasqtill DAtmospheric Condition Case 333.3',` Pasquill C33.3% Pasquill D33.3% Pasquill EAtmospheric Condition Case 433.3!, Pasquill 1)33.3, Pasquill E33.3K- Pasquill FAtmospheric Condition Case 550r', Pasquill D501? Pasquill Fwind speed variable (Pasquill Types A. B. E.and F windspeed 2 memer/sec: PasquillTypes C nid D windspeed 3 meter/sec)variable direction within a 22.5" sector.4-30 days See Figure I(D) Same diffusion relations asgiven above- windspeed variable dependenton Pasquill Type used; wind direction 33.3"frequency in a 22.50 sector.11This model should be used until adequate sitemeteorological data are obtained. In smote cases. avaitableinformation, such as meteorology, topography and geographicallocation. may dictate the use of a more restrictive model toinsure a conservative estimate of potential offtsite exposures.1.3-3 Ih. For BIWR's without stacks dhe almosphericdiffusion inodel6,should be as follows:(I) The 0-8 hour ground level releaseconcentrations may be reduced b'y a factor ranging fromone to a nlaximum of three (see Figure 2) for additionaldispersion produced by the turbulent wake of thereactor building in calculating potential exposures. Thevolumetric building wake correction factor, as defined insection 3-3.5.2 of Meteorology and Atomic Energy1968, should be used only in the 0-8 hour period; it isused with a shape factar of 1/2 and the minimumcroms-sectional area ot the reactor building only.(2) The basic equation for atmosphericdiffuision from a ground level point source is:x/0 =41U y ozWherethe short term average centerline value of theground level concentration (curie/rmeter3)Q amount of material released (curie/see)u windspeed (meter/sec)O y =the horizontal standard deviation of theplume (nieters) [See Figure V-I. Page 48,Nuclear Safrity. June 1961, Volume 2.Number 4. "Use of Routine MeteorologicalObservations for Estimating AtmosphericDispersion," F. A. Gifford. Jr.]ID =the vertical standard deviation of the plume(meters) ISee Figure V-2, Page 48.NuclearSafety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4."Use of Routine MeteorologicalObservations for Estimating AtmosphericDispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.](3) For time periods of greater than 8 hoursthe plume should be assumed to meander and spreaduniformly over a 22.5" sector. The resultant equation is:2.032X/Q =azUX*Whe rex = distance from point of release to the receptor;other variables are as given in h(2).(4) The atmospheric diffusion model forground level releases is based on the information in thetable below.Ti meFollowingAccidentAtmospheric Conditions0.8 hours Pasquill Type F, windspeed I meter/see,uniform direction8-24 hours Pasquill Type F, windspeed 1 meter/see,variable direction within a 22.50 sector1-4 days (a) 40% Pasquill Type D. windspeed 3meter/see(b) 60% Pasquill Type F, windspeed 2meter/sec(c) wind directionsectorvariable within a 22.504-30 days (a) 33.3% Pasquill Type C, windspeed 3meter/sec(b) 33.3% Pasquill Type D, windspeed 3meter/sec(c) 33.3% Pasquill Type F, windspeed 2meter/sec(d) Wiind direction 33.3% frequency in a22.5' sector(5) Figures 3A and 3B give the ground levelrelease atmospheric diffusion factors based on theparameters given in h(4),I I A 10-3SELEVATED RELEASEATMOSPHfERIC DIFFSON FACTORSS,0-8 HLJUR RiEtASE TIME* .FIGURE 1VA)10-4S10-5 _......_ .....L ..÷ .7. -Vb.... .. ... .......10-4S- .d_........___.....I -1 --*.102 103 10410Distance from Release Point (meters)1.3-5
a.
:-o : -T -r----.- ... -.... ................II ......... ' --10-310-io2 iO3 o oDistance from Release Point (meters)z -6i
 
.% -'Np..1ATMC.-LEXMATF&ULEASt. .kSH9R1C--D##ISMQ FACTORS1-4.C)A'Y.R:1LASE Tljfg.~FIGURE M()--t................. .*10-10-5E001010... .. ..Ii i.. ..I '*1* [ ....-4-2I I " /'---S --------sk TfI1It40# 1tI------------ L- ..I ýi ISI.:zzjzz~~I~VL~~I XA¶N.AIX-IIJpii:.i:F [ IxI '%71 ..1 1f-NI0l10-8102103Distance from Release Point (meters)1.3-7
Twenty-five percent of the equilibrium radioactive iodine inventory developed from maximum full power operation of the core should be assumed to be immediately available for leakage from the primary reactor containment. Ninety-one percent of this 25 percent is to be assumed to be in the form of elemental iodine, 5 percent of this 25 percent in the form of particulate iodine, and 4 percent of this 25 percent in the form of organic iodides.
* .. 4EUiVA"~bRIESATAMSW ON f-ORTtM..........* S* .,. ..~4-110-5i10-IL -L.4 -4T V : J. _ _7jI x___I Iv. I4N.NINi-- -------7:'.I~w z..L.JI102103.1o4Distance from Release Point (meters)1.3-8 r, EtVAMD. RELEASEATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FACTORSFOR .FUMIGATION qONDITIONS-ATMOSPHER IC CdiNDITIONgS.PASOUILL TYPE FWINDSPEED I METER/SEC" F1GUHE It ......10-2i;h 60 ..... ..0C,,10-... ..... .. .............i i:Tj .7 : i..................................... ,.. ..... .. ..-.I : aw~ H-F-9 WTNI,.A7-n LTL4-. 4--410-510-6102103104105Distance from Release Point (meters)3..9)
 
w ~K"i32.5 h----00u0racc5iFIGU^R'E 2 1 :T .I-._ ... .. ...M. :Ii-77 It* I-I..* I I* I0.50102St.ii 3; 1* I-i.1. iTd~36i102104Dlsnme from Structur (won W~0.-
b.
I AU V .-- ._.-.- ..I~ AVARIOUS TIN ESF LC14HN CI TFIGURE V(A)L-18-24 hours .~10a3 10 10Distance from Structure Imeters)10-5 L102
 
-lA0TMOSERL~qIF LLStOq Fibt~ .~ ~ .~... .. .. ..VARIOUS TIMES FOULOWING IAC Ir INT~ .~-.. FIGURE 3B) 300-8 hours.................... ..43.............................~~. ......ta .I JII. .... ......I. i4 -t103 10LLDit6Ic fromzz Stutr (meters}}
One hundred percent of the equilibrium radioactive noble gas inventory developed from maximum full power operation of the core should be assumed to be immediately available for leakage from the reactor containment.
 
c.
 
The effects of radiological decay during holdup in the containment or other buildings should be taken into account.
 
d.
 
The reduction in the amount of radioactive material available for leakage to the environment by containment sprays, recirculating filter systems, or other engineered safety features may be taken into account, but the amount of reduction in concentration of radioactive materials should be evaluated on an individual case basis.
 
e.
 
The primary containment should be assumed to leak at the leak rate incorporated or to be incorporated in the technical specifications for the duration of the USAEC REGULATORY GUIDES
Copies of published s nay be obtained by request Indicating the divisions desired to the US. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C. 20645, Regulatory Guides are issued to descobe and mal available to the Public Attention: Director of Regulatory Standrds. Comments and suggestions for methods acceptable to the AEC Regulatory staff of implementing specific parts of Improvements In thes guides we encouraged and should be sent to the Secretary ths Commission's regulations, to delineate techniques used by the staff in of the Commission, US. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C. 20645, eveluating specific problems or postulatedi accidents, or to provide guidance to Attention: Chief, Public Proceedings Staff.
 
applicants. Regulatory Guides are not substitutes for regulations end compliance with them is not required. Methods end solutions different from thorn set out in The auides are issued in the following ten broad divisions:
the guldes will be acceptable If they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance of a permit or license by the Commission.
 
===1. Power Reactors ===
 
===6. Products ===
2. Research and Test Reactors
 
===7. Transportation ===
3. Fuels and Materials Facilities
8. Occupational Health Published guide will be revised periodically, as appropriate, to accommodate
4. Environmental and Siting
9. Antitrust Review comments to reflect new information or experience.
 
5. Materials and Plant Protection
1
 
===0. General===
 
accident. 1 The leakage should be assumed to pass directly to the emergency exhaust system without mixing_2 in the surrounding reactor building atmosphere and should then be assumed to be released as an elevated plume for those facilities with stacks. '
f.
 
No credit should be given for retention of iodine in the suppression pool.
 
2.
 
Acceptable assumptions for atmospheric diffusion and dose conversion are:
a.
 
Elevated releases should be considered to be at a height equal to no more than the actual stack height.
 
Certain site dependent conditions may exist, such as surrounding elevated topography or nearby structures which will have the effect of reducing the actual stack height. The degree of stack height reduction should be evaluated on an individual case basis. Also, special meteorological and geographical conditions may exist which can contribute to greater ground level concentrations in the immediate neighborhood of a stack. For example, fumigation should always be assumed to occur; however, the length of time that a fumigation condition exists is strongly dependent on geographical and seasonal factors and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.4 (See Figures IA
through 1D for atmospheric diffusion factors for an elevated release with fumigation.)  
b.
 
No correction should be made for depletion of the effluent plume of radioactive iodine due to deposition on the ground, or for the radiological decay of iodine in transit.
 
c.
 
For the first 8 hours, the breathing rate of persons offsite should be assumed to be 3.47x 104 cubic meters per second. From 8 to 24 hours following the accident, the breathing rate should be assumed to be
1.75 x 10"4 cubic meters per second. After that until the end of the accident, the rate should be assumed to be
2.32 x 10-4 cubic meters per second. (These values were
1The effect on containment leakage under accident conditions of1 features provided to reduce the leakage of radioactive materials from the containment will be evaluated on an individual case basis.
 
"2 In some cases, credit for mixing will be allowed; however, the amount of credit allowed will be evaluated on an individual case basis.
 
' Credit for an elevated release should be given only if the point of release is (1) more than two and one-half times the height of any structure close enough to affect the dispersion of the plume, or (2) located far enough from any structure which could have an effect on the dispersion of the plume. For those BWR's without stacks the atmospheric diffusion factors assuming ground level release given in section 2.h. should be used to determine site acceptability.
 
4 For sites located more than 2 miles from large bodies of water such as oceans or one of the Great Lakes, a fumigation condition should be assumed to exist at the time of the accident and continue for one-half hour. For sites located less than 2 miles from large bodies of water, a fumigation condition should be assumed to exist at the time of the accident and continue for
4 hours.
 
developed from the average daily breathing rate [2 x 107 cm3 /day] assumed in the report of ICRP, Committee
11-1959.). 
d.
 
The iodine dose conversion factors are given in ICRP Publication  
2, Report of Committee II,
"Permissible Dose for Internal Radiation," 1959.
 
e.
 
External whole body doses should be calculated using "Infinite Cloud" assumptions, i.e., the dimensions of the cloud are assumed to be large compared to the distance that the gamma rays and beta particles travel.
 
"Such a cloud would be considered an infinite cloud for a receptor at the center because any additional [gamma and]
beta emitting material beyond the cloud dimensions would not alter the flux of [gamma rays and] beta particles to the receptor" (Meteorology and Atomic Energy, Section 7.4.1.1-editorial additions made so that gamma and beta emitting material could be considered). Under these conditions the rate of energy absorption per unit volume is equal to the rate of energy released per unit volume. For an infinite uniform cloud containing X curies of beta radioactivity per cubic meter the beta dose in air at the cloud center is:  
SD4g = 0.457 EX
The surface body dose rate from beta emitters in the infinite cloud can be approximated as being one-half this amount (i.e., 0D+/- = 0.23 ETX).
For gamma emitting material the dose rate in air at the cloud center is:  
D
0.507 .EX
From a semi-infinite cloud, the gamma dose rate in air is:  
S=  
0.25 E~x Where
= beta dose rate from an infinite cloud (rad/sec)  
gamma dose rate from an infinite cloud (rad/sec)  
Eg =  
average beta energy per disintegration (Mev/dis)  
EB = average gamma energy per disintegration  
"(Mev/dis)  
X  
= concentration of beta or gamma emitting isotope in the cloud (curie/m 3)  
f.
 
The following specific assumptions are acceptable with respect to the radioactive cloud dose calculations:  
(1) The dose at any distance fronthe reactor should be calculated based on the maximum concentration in the plume at that distance taking into account specific meteorological, topographical, and other characteristics which may affect the maximum plume concentration. These site related characteristics
1.3-2
 
must be evaluated on an individual case basis. In the case of beta radiation, the receptor is assumed to be exposed to an infinite cloud at the maximum ground level concentration at that distance from the reactor. In the case of gamma radiation, the receptor is assumed to be exposed to only one-half the cloud owing to the presence of the ground. The maximum cloud concentration always should be assumed to be at ground level.
 
(2) The appropriate average beta and gamma energies emitted per disintegration, as given in the Table of Isotopes, Sixth Edition, by C. M. Lederer, J. M.
 
Hollander, I. Perlman; University of California, Berkeley;
Lawrence Radiation Laboratory; should be used.
 
g.
 
For BWR's with stacks the atmospheric diffusion model should be as follows:  
(1) The basic equation for atmospheric diffusion from an elevated release is:
exp(-h2 I2oz2)
X/Q
iu a Sy~z Where X
= the short term average centerline value of the ground level concentration (curie/meter 3)  
Q  
= amount of material released (curie/sec)  
u  
= windspeed (meter/sec)  
y= the horizontal standard deviation of the plume (meters) [See Figure V-l, Page 48, Nuclear Safety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4, "Use of Routine Meteorological Observations for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.]
oz= the vertical standard deviation of the plume (meters) [See Figure V-2, Page 48, Nuclear Safety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4,  
"Use of Routine Meteorological Observations for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.]
h  
= effective height of release (meters)  
(2) For time periods of greater than 8 hours the plume from an elevated release should be assumed to meander and spread uniformly over a 22.50 sector. The resultant equation is:  
2.032 exp(-h2/2az 2)  
x/Q  
a=ux Where x
= distance from the release point (meters);  
other variables are as given in g(l).
(3) The atmospheric diffusion model s for an elevated release as a function of the distance from the reactor, is based on the information in the table below.
 
Time Following Accident Atmospheric Conditions
0-8 hours See Figure I(A)  
Envelope of Pasquill diffusion categories based on Figure A7 Meteorology and Atomic Energy-1968, assuming various stack heights; windspeed 1 meter/sec; uniform direction.
 
8-24 hours See Figure I(B)  
Envelope of Pasquill diffusion categories; windspeed 1 meter/sec;
variable direction within a 22.50 sector.
 
14 days See Figure 1(C) Envelope of Pasquill diffusion categories with the following relationship used to represent maximum plume concentrations as a function of distance:  
Atmospheric Condition Case 1
40% Pasquill A
60% Pasquill C
Atmospheric Condition Case 2
50% Pasquill C
50% Pasquill D
Atmospheric Condition Case 3  
33.3% Pasquill C
33.3% Pasquill D
33.3% Pasquill E
Atmospheric Condition Case 4
33.3% Pasquill D
33.3% Pasquill E
33.3% Pasquill F
Atmospheric Condition Case 5
50% Pasquill D
50% Pasquill F
wind speed variable (Pasquill Types A, B, E,
and F windspeed 2 meter/sec; Pasquill Types C and D windspeed 3 meter/sec);
variable direction within a 22.50 sector.
 
4-30 days See Figure I(D) Same diffusion relations as given above; windspeed variable dependent on Pasquill Type used; wind direction 33.3%
frequency in a 22.50 sector.
 
This model should be used until adequate site meteorological data are obtained. In some cases, available information, such as meteorology, topography and geographical location, may dictate the use of a more restrictive model to insure a conservative estimate of potential offsite exposures.
 
1.3-3
 
h.
 
For BWR's without stacks the atmospheric diffusion model 6 should be as follows:  
(1) The  
0-8 hour ground level release concentrations may be reduced by a factor ranging from one to a maximum of three (see Figure 2) for additional dispersion produced by the turbulent wake of the reactor building in calculating potential exposures. The volumetric building wake correction factor, as defined in section 3-3.5.2 of Meteorology and Atomic Energy
1968, should be used only in the 0-8 hour period; it is used with a shape factor of 1/2 and the minimum cross-sectional area of the reactor building only.
 
(2) The basic equation for atmospheric diffusion from a ground level point source is:  
1 x/Q = 7rUOryc"Z
Where
(4) The atmospheric diffusion model for ground level releases is based on the information in the table below.
 
Time Following Accident Atmospheric Conditions
0-8 hours Pasquill Type F, windspeed  
1 meter/sec, uniform direction
8-24 hours Pasquill Type F, windspeed
1 meter/sec, variable direction within a 22.50 sector
14 days (a) 40% Pasquill Type D, windspeed
3 meter/sec (b) 60% Pasquill Type F,  
meter/sec (c) wind direction variable sector windspeed
2 within a 22.50
x
= the short term average centerline value of the ground level concentration (curie/meter 3)  
Q
= amount of material released (curie/sec)
u
= windspeed (meter/sec)
ay = the horizontal standard deviation of the plume (meters) [See Figure V-1, Page 48, Nuclear Safety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4, "Use of Routine Meteorological Observations for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.]
z= the vertical standard deviation of the plume (meters) [See Figure V-2, Page 48, Nuclear Safety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4,
"Use of Routine Meteorological Observations for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.]
(3) For time periods of greater than 8 hours the plume should be assumed to meander and spread unikormly over a 22.50 sector. The resultant equation is:
4-30 days (a) 33.3% Pasquill Type C, windspeed 3 meter/sec (b) 33.3% Pasquill Type D, windspeed 3 meter/sec (c) 33.3% Pasquill Type F, windspeed 2 meter/sec (d) Wind direction 33.3% frequency in a
22.50 sector
(5) Figures 3A and 3B give the ground level release atmospheric diffusion factors based on the parameters given in h(4).
 
==D. IMPLEMENTATION==
The purpose of the revision (indicated by a line in the margin) to this guide is to reflect current Regulatory staff practice in the review of construction permit appli cations, and the revised guide, therefore, is effective immediately.
 
2.032 X/Q =-
Where x
= distance from point of release to the receptor;
other variables are as given in h(2).
1.3-4
 
10
10r5
0
U
10
102 J-. 4 -
4 .- 


-j
.1 If Att~
-
i4i
L47L
*
...i
. i.
 
-
-I
41 j
f I -I-
/HL
F I
- j I
1Z.LJ-
---
J-4----------4-f~-,
4~
+~-4 L
77-
-
--4-  
4
1
4 Lw bhi5ometer;¶1 I
III
p
12
1
-  
*t

-
-14--p
5 meters4.
 
4-1
-,--  
4 -1-  
+ -- 4 -1--i--1-1
-k Li
-.4- U
----
4---  
4-  
+ -
-4-- +/- -1
-4--1--4---t-
- 4..
1
4-4- -
+ -s-- + -- 4 CF'I(PaqII Diffis~io'
(T ssSow asryas.h
-t-L
ADS
-j
~~~-.~~~~~.-4-~~~~~~~~~-~
1  
.I
~ 4-~--  
-4--  
-
---
4-4-4-  
4
4--+--I-
4
14-14
----
4--
r
10
-j i-v
1tIf
.4
-ij t-
-4.-
4
----I -J
I
--4--I
II
-4
10
Distance from Release Point (meters)
1.3-5
-4-
!ILI
I
-
-. -
4 -I-
4-I
.4
4 j +-
4 I-
I
~ ~ I K
ELVTERLES
-7-1;vh-75 meterst
-7
10
-12
10 5
 
10 - S2Tm d~ 7
*
I
.I 1 I
.L
.**
.......  
. .
..
1
.
ELEVATED RELEASE
:ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION FACTORS
S8-24 HOUR RELEASE TIME.
 
~z1Iiii~d42b~c..  
..
1
-...
LJL
L7I:7t:.
................................................................
*1
*
I.
 
103
105 Distance from Release Point (meters)  
1.3-6 LZiIzt Bizz
10-
LL
C
0 -
01-I
10-k
101'
IE
"I
I¸
i.
 
: I
.
J'-!j`:'j171T;,
 
p.ý
C
C
I-
. . . ..
V4, T; 7
:j.
 
1;:
L
T:T.
 
-v A
:.wa- m..
ts:
7
'wr VT
-J.
 
i f 11 Ta;
-H
T 4
ým w;
7W
ýIzr, lit: tlý
T:
777 v1!
L
ýi Ri;
'Tit
;7:
v T
T:
4.,:.
47:
+
10
3; q E. :F
Em T=
------
UM
---
---
H7 Tý
rr I iýt i4i,-
7777-77 i,
T+I :7: L '-77
77
-w tý I" tit lp
14, TM L-,.
4,n mg tj a
M
IL
7; - T
(,w/ow) DIXjom=d uoisnula I
LX t'i.i
1V t II
f%. 
6 I
0 a.
 
U
3
.5 E
0
T'
c
'9 a
I-
:1 Id :1
1
-L-L
I.... I- -
 
10
10-
U.1 fie
104I
H
---4- ij
~TTI
YE
T
-I
---
---1-
* I- 1 1:
J: f I
I
I
7i*~ jf1i~li itIl~
t
'i v.
 
4
77ý 7*'7.-.. 
9 itl:
L
.
... ... 
jaAff:. 
Ir or
.4.7 pp Lt, I
t li Will N,
-fý
'aull i!:
ift H.:
44 lAA iififi` q M rju MA
:; IT C
I -
. 1. i.
 
A- W::
C
ali ItL
T
I I
hiAl.;
-7
-it W III
%L' 1, AA
7--
-77 i
X,
I i I
C 11
10
-114 a
Z_ý_L
...
-------
a I _T
1T Ay- ug
-1 -1:: IN
lit ItMA
HT jlllflllý
4i"
V.
 
V1 Wi R! 19 INER i U
!;I i 11'4ý M
P4 Fý, 4ý4
17 Tf iflul il M
Ml
1UN
IMU-
N"I
-7r+ !it liil lv, fili I
P11 flif
:1 fl IfAma, lFfff M,
I El U.
 
1W
,
Nt I f
ýf AT
I
A
it
::ij
:q.1=i;
Yi j ::;l it qi:
T
7
7
102
+/-
t I--
4,1++
Distance from Release Point (meters)
1.3-8 I I . .
w I
~
~ EIE --
__ _7
-;. 
1-_4L
~
1 t
.1
:1
103
104
 
1- -
"!
I
II
I
.1 I
j.4ivit I lit I. v
10-2
10-3
0
10-5
-6
10
104 Distance from Release Point (meters)
1 .3-9
:
!{iELEVATED RELEASE
ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FACTORS
FOR FUMIGATION CONDITIONS
7ý
"
=: -ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS
PASQUlLL TYPE F
.... 
fTWINDSPEED 1 METER/SEC
1=507
7etrs Sh=75
1 Smeters
'"!I
IL10 meesj h=125~J
meeJ*'
l=15
$1er
2
10
103
105
 
4.)
___
. 
______
N
r
 i rrf
:i I Vt I 4----
:17 i4 liP
\\ \\\\fii
3
2.5
-1.5
*1
-
..
.
.
i7
7V7
i-tx Si.
 
Iil
-.
----
V
r r
Id Il,
+
"F4H
-..-.- T-;-t.:-.
- +
..
7T
TW
-4- BUILDING WAKE
CORRECTION FACTOR-
-i-i-i-,-
-I
T
LL
4 V
Ilil I I
411*
14I
. I
* 1 I!1 U--
ii jr I
I
ritttr1PmrtPF
-
+/-..L-.----I- Hhl'* Will I
I I
I
rt-i'1'Thtr-!
iIi
7
.
.1-7 H'4
*" *-*
7_.
 
*
S. ..
. : :.; :;;;T
I
r
1'
4r ii III
10"*
(
T.1
177f II
Z
II!
I,-I
-
-....
. meters 2
0.5A-1500 meers20
0.5A-2000 meters
0.5
0
-F-,
103 Distance from Structure (meters)
-I.
 
-. 4- Th.
 
T
L*..1 t nlý
,
*
!
z.
 
.
!
!
!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
..
..
.
t
.
*
I
,
I
I
I
I
I I
J
i
.
,
r
,llJh n
I
, .
,,I
I
I
t ' t . ..
. I
I
!
;;
;
;
;
;
.
.
.
.
i n
.-
I
I
I I I I
I
I
.
.
.
..
_
I , , l i
,7 1
]
1
,
1 I I I I I I~l
,
~ ,
,
II
IIF
:I]
!i III
if!
i .l
2-_-i N!
I
<
t
"
i
_-&#xfd;
7&#xfd;q
4_4
-----
,,---
-
.
. . .
.
T -
 
1w4Thz4 GROUND LEVEL RELEASE
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION FACTORS FOR
VARIOUS TIMES FOLLOWING ACCIDENTw TTW T I i I '' ; I I
T
44
-3
3 _7.
 
-<J4jT2:
-8-24hours,:.. 
0V
U.
 
7 yjIIti;; :
Jfi.ti~
S4-34 days, t&#xfd;z5 L
1O2
163 Distance from structure (meters)
1.3-11
10-2
10-
10-
I I I-
- I 111r . I f&#xfd; I I n if"ITF-1 I I I I I " ' H I ,
I
..
.. .. .. -.. .. -Il- 11 i
&#xfd; Llt"
&#xfd; r! " &#xfd; 4 PP f " rH
9 Ml
+ t E I + &#xfd; T &#xfd; I t -, -, I
t-11 -
-
I
10"
104 tj M-f i i-t
)-8 hours fl-
#
 
- .
-4--GROUND
LEVEL RELEASE
T
..,2
~~~
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION
ATR
O
I'
VARIOUS TIMES FOLLOWING ACCIDENT
,T
t
{-0-8 hours
*
r71 V
.
-t
74*
-T4:+o r
~
74i
:R.P
I
I! ii I
II -t----tt 4 -  t---t-t--t--rt-I-t1-1-i-r1--FrTLflTLHiL1iTh1Lu4i4 Tr KNL
+/-1--in
1-4 days T
1A
-4--.
4 T-- q
1
+1.1
4
4~
y~
- *
'.
4~
IIN
44'7
. .. . . . .. . .
.
-i4+/-AET'1Th12-rV
jL
1
4-4- I
-
"12% -t I
I
I
I
Ii A--
.
7:
4.,
-4 T'
4 L.L. A .LA L J


1 .
-
I I
I
I -
-
= -
-
- -
_______
Distance from S tructure (meters) 1
1.3-12
414
4.
 
-I-. Li
--
lU
E
.2
70~
10
10
17F;
I-.
-I-.
-4.-
-T
4-4 f T~
1 4
&#xfd;
I.
 
1 T-
--4
-i J  JJ LI I
;; 41 rEtLI
L
1'
I -I-
-4
4+/-
-4+/-U
A
10
.
Al ff!
-
-5 L--
10
-T
-4-}}


{{RG-Nav}}
{{RG-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 02:09, 17 January 2025

Assumptions Used for Evaluating the Potential Radiological Consequences of a Loss of Coolant Accident for Boiling Water Reactors
ML003739601
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/30/1974
From:
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
References
RG-1.3, Rev 2
Download: ML003739601 (12)


U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

REGULATORY

DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDS

Revision 2 June 1974 GUIDE

REGULATORY GUIDE 1.3 ASSUMPTIONS USED FOR EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES

OF A LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT FOR BOILING WATER REACTORS

A. INTRODUCTION

Section 50.34 of 10 CFR Part 50 requires that each applicant for a construction permit or operating license provide an analysis and evaluation of the design and performance of structures, systems, and components of the facility with the objective of assessing the risk to public health and safety resulting from operation of the facility. The design basis loss of coolant accident (LOCA) is one of the postulated accidents used to evaluate the adequacy of these structures, systems, and components with respect to the public health and safety.

This guide gives acceptable assumptions that may be used in evaluating the radiological consequences of this accident for a boiling water reactor. In some cases, unusual site characteristics, plant design features, or other factors may require different assumptions which will be considered on an individual case basis. The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has been consulted concerning this guide and has concurred in the regulatory position.

B. DISCUSSION

After reviewing a number of applications for construction permits and operating licenses for boiling water power reactors, the AEC Regulatory staff has developed a number of appropriately conservative assumptions, based on engineering judgment and on applicable experimental results from safety research programs conducted by the AEC and the nuclear industry, that are used to evaluate calculations of the diological consequences of various postulated accidents.

This guide lists acceptable assumptions that may be used to evaluate the design basis LOCA of a Boiling Water Reactor (BWR). It should be shown that the offsite dose consequences will be within the guidelines of 10 CFR Part 100. (During the construction permit review, guideline, exposures of 20 rem whole body and

150 rem thyroid should be used rather than the values given in § 100.11 in order to allow for (a) uncertainties in final design details and meteorology or (b) new data and calculational techniques that might influence the final design of engineered safety features or the dose reduction factors allowed for these features.)

C. REGULATORY POSITION

1. The assumptions related to the release of radioactive material from the fuel and containment are as follows:

a.

Twenty-five percent of the equilibrium radioactive iodine inventory developed from maximum full power operation of the core should be assumed to be immediately available for leakage from the primary reactor containment. Ninety-one percent of this 25 percent is to be assumed to be in the form of elemental iodine, 5 percent of this 25 percent in the form of particulate iodine, and 4 percent of this 25 percent in the form of organic iodides.

b.

One hundred percent of the equilibrium radioactive noble gas inventory developed from maximum full power operation of the core should be assumed to be immediately available for leakage from the reactor containment.

c.

The effects of radiological decay during holdup in the containment or other buildings should be taken into account.

d.

The reduction in the amount of radioactive material available for leakage to the environment by containment sprays, recirculating filter systems, or other engineered safety features may be taken into account, but the amount of reduction in concentration of radioactive materials should be evaluated on an individual case basis.

e.

The primary containment should be assumed to leak at the leak rate incorporated or to be incorporated in the technical specifications for the duration of the USAEC REGULATORY GUIDES

Copies of published s nay be obtained by request Indicating the divisions desired to the US. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C. 20645, Regulatory Guides are issued to descobe and mal available to the Public Attention: Director of Regulatory Standrds. Comments and suggestions for methods acceptable to the AEC Regulatory staff of implementing specific parts of Improvements In thes guides we encouraged and should be sent to the Secretary ths Commission's regulations, to delineate techniques used by the staff in of the Commission, US. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C. 20645, eveluating specific problems or postulatedi accidents, or to provide guidance to Attention: Chief, Public Proceedings Staff.

applicants. Regulatory Guides are not substitutes for regulations end compliance with them is not required. Methods end solutions different from thorn set out in The auides are issued in the following ten broad divisions:

the guldes will be acceptable If they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance of a permit or license by the Commission.

1. Power Reactors

6. Products

2. Research and Test Reactors

7. Transportation

3. Fuels and Materials Facilities

8. Occupational Health Published guide will be revised periodically, as appropriate, to accommodate

4. Environmental and Siting

9. Antitrust Review comments to reflect new information or experience.

5. Materials and Plant Protection

1

0. General

accident. 1 The leakage should be assumed to pass directly to the emergency exhaust system without mixing_2 in the surrounding reactor building atmosphere and should then be assumed to be released as an elevated plume for those facilities with stacks. '

f.

No credit should be given for retention of iodine in the suppression pool.

2.

Acceptable assumptions for atmospheric diffusion and dose conversion are:

a.

Elevated releases should be considered to be at a height equal to no more than the actual stack height.

Certain site dependent conditions may exist, such as surrounding elevated topography or nearby structures which will have the effect of reducing the actual stack height. The degree of stack height reduction should be evaluated on an individual case basis. Also, special meteorological and geographical conditions may exist which can contribute to greater ground level concentrations in the immediate neighborhood of a stack. For example, fumigation should always be assumed to occur; however, the length of time that a fumigation condition exists is strongly dependent on geographical and seasonal factors and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.4 (See Figures IA

through 1D for atmospheric diffusion factors for an elevated release with fumigation.)

b.

No correction should be made for depletion of the effluent plume of radioactive iodine due to deposition on the ground, or for the radiological decay of iodine in transit.

c.

For the first 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, the breathing rate of persons offsite should be assumed to be 3.47x 104 cubic meters per second. From 8 to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following the accident, the breathing rate should be assumed to be

1.75 x 10"4 cubic meters per second. After that until the end of the accident, the rate should be assumed to be

2.32 x 10-4 cubic meters per second. (These values were

1The effect on containment leakage under accident conditions of1 features provided to reduce the leakage of radioactive materials from the containment will be evaluated on an individual case basis.

"2 In some cases, credit for mixing will be allowed; however, the amount of credit allowed will be evaluated on an individual case basis.

' Credit for an elevated release should be given only if the point of release is (1) more than two and one-half times the height of any structure close enough to affect the dispersion of the plume, or (2) located far enough from any structure which could have an effect on the dispersion of the plume. For those BWR's without stacks the atmospheric diffusion factors assuming ground level release given in section 2.h. should be used to determine site acceptability.

4 For sites located more than 2 miles from large bodies of water such as oceans or one of the Great Lakes, a fumigation condition should be assumed to exist at the time of the accident and continue for one-half hour. For sites located less than 2 miles from large bodies of water, a fumigation condition should be assumed to exist at the time of the accident and continue for

4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.

developed from the average daily breathing rate [2 x 107 cm3 /day] assumed in the report of ICRP, Committee

11-1959.).

d.

The iodine dose conversion factors are given in ICRP Publication

2, Report of Committee II,

"Permissible Dose for Internal Radiation," 1959.

e.

External whole body doses should be calculated using "Infinite Cloud" assumptions, i.e., the dimensions of the cloud are assumed to be large compared to the distance that the gamma rays and beta particles travel.

"Such a cloud would be considered an infinite cloud for a receptor at the center because any additional [gamma and]

beta emitting material beyond the cloud dimensions would not alter the flux of [gamma rays and] beta particles to the receptor" (Meteorology and Atomic Energy, Section 7.4.1.1-editorial additions made so that gamma and beta emitting material could be considered). Under these conditions the rate of energy absorption per unit volume is equal to the rate of energy released per unit volume. For an infinite uniform cloud containing X curies of beta radioactivity per cubic meter the beta dose in air at the cloud center is:

SD4g = 0.457 EX

The surface body dose rate from beta emitters in the infinite cloud can be approximated as being one-half this amount (i.e., 0D+/- = 0.23 ETX).

For gamma emitting material the dose rate in air at the cloud center is:

D

0.507 .EX

From a semi-infinite cloud, the gamma dose rate in air is:

S=

0.25 E~x Where

= beta dose rate from an infinite cloud (rad/sec)

gamma dose rate from an infinite cloud (rad/sec)

Eg =

average beta energy per disintegration (Mev/dis)

EB = average gamma energy per disintegration

"(Mev/dis)

X

= concentration of beta or gamma emitting isotope in the cloud (curie/m 3)

f.

The following specific assumptions are acceptable with respect to the radioactive cloud dose calculations:

(1) The dose at any distance fronthe reactor should be calculated based on the maximum concentration in the plume at that distance taking into account specific meteorological, topographical, and other characteristics which may affect the maximum plume concentration. These site related characteristics

1.3-2

must be evaluated on an individual case basis. In the case of beta radiation, the receptor is assumed to be exposed to an infinite cloud at the maximum ground level concentration at that distance from the reactor. In the case of gamma radiation, the receptor is assumed to be exposed to only one-half the cloud owing to the presence of the ground. The maximum cloud concentration always should be assumed to be at ground level.

(2) The appropriate average beta and gamma energies emitted per disintegration, as given in the Table of Isotopes, Sixth Edition, by C. M. Lederer, J. M.

Hollander, I. Perlman; University of California, Berkeley;

Lawrence Radiation Laboratory; should be used.

g.

For BWR's with stacks the atmospheric diffusion model should be as follows:

(1) The basic equation for atmospheric diffusion from an elevated release is:

exp(-h2 I2oz2)

X/Q

iu a Sy~z Where X

= the short term average centerline value of the ground level concentration (curie/meter 3)

Q

= amount of material released (curie/sec)

u

= windspeed (meter/sec)

y= the horizontal standard deviation of the plume (meters) [See Figure V-l, Page 48, Nuclear Safety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4, "Use of Routine Meteorological Observations for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.]

oz= the vertical standard deviation of the plume (meters) [See Figure V-2, Page 48, Nuclear Safety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4,

"Use of Routine Meteorological Observations for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.]

h

= effective height of release (meters)

(2) For time periods of greater than 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> the plume from an elevated release should be assumed to meander and spread uniformly over a 22.50 sector. The resultant equation is:

2.032 exp(-h2/2az 2)

x/Q

a=ux Where x

= distance from the release point (meters);

other variables are as given in g(l).

(3) The atmospheric diffusion model s for an elevated release as a function of the distance from the reactor, is based on the information in the table below.

Time Following Accident Atmospheric Conditions

0-8 hours See Figure I(A)

Envelope of Pasquill diffusion categories based on Figure A7 Meteorology and Atomic Energy-1968, assuming various stack heights; windspeed 1 meter/sec; uniform direction.

8-24 hours See Figure I(B)

Envelope of Pasquill diffusion categories; windspeed 1 meter/sec;

variable direction within a 22.50 sector.

14 days See Figure 1(C) Envelope of Pasquill diffusion categories with the following relationship used to represent maximum plume concentrations as a function of distance:

Atmospheric Condition Case 1

40% Pasquill A

60% Pasquill C

Atmospheric Condition Case 2

50% Pasquill C

50% Pasquill D

Atmospheric Condition Case 3

33.3% Pasquill C

33.3% Pasquill D

33.3% Pasquill E

Atmospheric Condition Case 4

33.3% Pasquill D

33.3% Pasquill E

33.3% Pasquill F

Atmospheric Condition Case 5

50% Pasquill D

50% Pasquill F

wind speed variable (Pasquill Types A, B, E,

and F windspeed 2 meter/sec; Pasquill Types C and D windspeed 3 meter/sec);

variable direction within a 22.50 sector.

4-30 days See Figure I(D) Same diffusion relations as given above; windspeed variable dependent on Pasquill Type used; wind direction 33.3%

frequency in a 22.50 sector.

This model should be used until adequate site meteorological data are obtained. In some cases, available information, such as meteorology, topography and geographical location, may dictate the use of a more restrictive model to insure a conservative estimate of potential offsite exposures.

1.3-3

h.

For BWR's without stacks the atmospheric diffusion model 6 should be as follows:

(1) The

0-8 hour ground level release concentrations may be reduced by a factor ranging from one to a maximum of three (see Figure 2) for additional dispersion produced by the turbulent wake of the reactor building in calculating potential exposures. The volumetric building wake correction factor, as defined in section 3-3.5.2 of Meteorology and Atomic Energy

1968, should be used only in the 0-8 hour period; it is used with a shape factor of 1/2 and the minimum cross-sectional area of the reactor building only.

(2) The basic equation for atmospheric diffusion from a ground level point source is:

1 x/Q = 7rUOryc"Z

Where

(4) The atmospheric diffusion model for ground level releases is based on the information in the table below.

Time Following Accident Atmospheric Conditions

0-8 hours Pasquill Type F, windspeed

1 meter/sec, uniform direction

8-24 hours Pasquill Type F, windspeed

1 meter/sec, variable direction within a 22.50 sector

14 days (a) 40% Pasquill Type D, windspeed

3 meter/sec (b) 60% Pasquill Type F,

meter/sec (c) wind direction variable sector windspeed

2 within a 22.50

x

= the short term average centerline value of the ground level concentration (curie/meter 3)

Q

= amount of material released (curie/sec)

u

= windspeed (meter/sec)

ay = the horizontal standard deviation of the plume (meters) [See Figure V-1, Page 48, Nuclear Safety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4, "Use of Routine Meteorological Observations for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.]

z= the vertical standard deviation of the plume (meters) [See Figure V-2, Page 48, Nuclear Safety, June 1961, Volume 2, Number 4,

"Use of Routine Meteorological Observations for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion," F. A. Gifford, Jr.]

(3) For time periods of greater than 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> the plume should be assumed to meander and spread unikormly over a 22.50 sector. The resultant equation is:

4-30 days (a) 33.3% Pasquill Type C, windspeed 3 meter/sec (b) 33.3% Pasquill Type D, windspeed 3 meter/sec (c) 33.3% Pasquill Type F, windspeed 2 meter/sec (d) Wind direction 33.3% frequency in a

22.50 sector

(5) Figures 3A and 3B give the ground level release atmospheric diffusion factors based on the parameters given in h(4).

D. IMPLEMENTATION

The purpose of the revision (indicated by a line in the margin) to this guide is to reflect current Regulatory staff practice in the review of construction permit appli cations, and the revised guide, therefore, is effective immediately.

2.032 X/Q =-

Where x

= distance from point of release to the receptor;

other variables are as given in h(2).

1.3-4

10

10r5

0

U

10

102 J-. 4 -

4 .- 





-j

.1 If Att~

-

i4i

L47L

...i

. i.

-

-I

41 j

f I -I-

/HL

F I

- j I

1Z.LJ-

---

J-4----------4-f~-,

4~

+~-4 L

77-

-

--4-

4

1

4 Lw bhi5ometer;¶1 I

III

p

12

1

-

  • t



-

-14--p

5 meters4.

4-1

-,--

4 -1-

+ -- 4 -1--i--1-1

-k Li

-.4- U


4---

4-

+ -

-4-- +/- -1

-4--1--4---t-

- 4..

1

4-4- -

+ -s-- + -- 4 CF'I(PaqII Diffis~io'

(T ssSow asryas.h

-t-L

ADS

-j

~~~-.~~~~~.-4-~~~~~~~~~-~

1

.I

~ 4-~--

-4--

-

---

4-4-4-

4

4--+--I-

4

14-14


4--

r

10

-j i-v

1tIf

.4

-ij t-

-4.-

4


I -J

I

--4--I

II

-4

10

Distance from Release Point (meters)

1.3-5

-4-

!ILI

I

-

-. -

4 -I-

4-I

.4

4 j +-

4 I-

I

~ ~ I K

ELVTERLES

-7-1;vh-75 meterst

-7

10

-12

10 5

10 - S2Tm d~ 7

I

.I 1 I

.L

.**

.......

. .

..

1

.

ELEVATED RELEASE

ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION FACTORS

S8-24 HOUR RELEASE TIME.

~z1Iiii~d42b~c..

..

1

-...

LJL

L7I:7t:.

................................................................

  • 1

I.

103

105 Distance from Release Point (meters)

1.3-6 LZiIzt Bizz

10-

LL

C

0 -

01-I

10-k

101'

IE

"I

i.

I

.

J'-!j`:'j171T;,

p.ý

C

C

I-

. . . ..

V4, T; 7

j.

1;:

L

T:T.

-v A

.wa- m...

ts:

7

'wr VT

-J.

i f 11 Ta;

-H

T 4

ým w;

7W

ýIzr, lit: tlý

T:

777 v1!

L

ýi Ri;

'Tit

7

v T

T:

4.,:.

47:

+

10

3; q E. :F

Em T=


UM

---

---

H7 Tý

rr I iýt i4i,-

7777-77 i,

T+I :7: L '-77

77

-w tý I" tit lp

14, TM L-,.

4,n mg tj a

M

IL

7; - T

(,w/ow) DIXjom=d uoisnula I

LX t'i.i

1V t II

f%.

6 I

0 a.

U

3

.5 E

0

T'

c

'9 a

I-

1 Id :1

1

-L-L

I.... I- -

10

10-

U.1 fie

104I

H

---4- ij

~TTI

YE

T

-I

---

---1-

  • I- 1 1:

J: f I

I

I

7i*~ jf1i~li itIl~

t

'i v.

4

77ý 7*'7.-..

9 itl:

L

.

... ...

jaAff:.

Ir or

.4.7 pp Lt, I

t li Will N,

-fý

'aull i!:

ift H.:

44 lAA iififi` q M rju MA

IT C

I -

. 1. i.

A- W::

C

ali ItL

T

I I

hiAl.;

-7

-it W III

%L' 1, AA

7--

-77 i

X,

I i I

C 11

10

-114 a

Z_ý_L

...


a I _T

1T Ay- ug

-1 -1:: IN

lit ItMA

HT jlllflllý

4i"

V.

V1 Wi R! 19 INER i U

!;I i 11'4ý M

P4 Fý, 4ý4

17 Tf iflul il M

Ml

1UN

IMU-

N"I

-7r+ !it liil lv, fili I

P11 flif

1 fl IfAma, lFfff M,

I El U.

1W

,

Nt I f

ýf AT

I

A

it

ij
q.1=i;

Yi j ::;l it qi:

T

7

7

102

+/-

t I--

4,1++

Distance from Release Point (meters)

1.3-8 I I . .

w I

~

~ EIE --

__ _7

-;.

1-_4L

~

1 t

.1

1

103

104

1- -

"!

I

II

I

.1 I

j.4ivit I lit I. v

10-2

10-3

0

10-5

-6

10

104 Distance from Release Point (meters)

1 .3-9

!{iELEVATED RELEASE

ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FACTORS

FOR FUMIGATION CONDITIONS

"

=: -ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS

PASQUlLL TYPE F

....

fTWINDSPEED 1 METER/SEC

1=507

7etrs Sh=75

1 Smeters

'"!I

IL10 meesj h=125~J

meeJ*'

l=15

$1er

2

10

103

105

4.)

___

.

______

N

r

 i rrf

i I Vt I 4----
17 i4 liP

\\ \\\\fii

3

2.5

-1.5

  • 1

-

..

.

.

i7

7V7

i-tx Si.

Iil

-.


V

r r

Id Il,

+

"F4H

-..-.- T-;-t.:-.

- +

..

7T

TW

-4- BUILDING WAKE

CORRECTION FACTOR-

-i-i-i-,-

-I

T

LL

4 V

Ilil I I

411*

14I

. I

  • 1 I!1 U--

ii jr I

I

ritttr1PmrtPF

-

+/-..L-.----I- Hhl'* Will I

I I

I

rt-i'1'Thtr-!

iIi

7

.

.1-7 H'4

  • " *-*

7_.

S. ..

. : :.; :;;;T

I

r

1'

4r ii III

10"*

(

T.1

177f II

Z

II!

I,-I

-

-....

. meters 2

0.5A-1500 meers20

0.5A-2000 meters

0.5

0

-F-,

103 Distance from Structure (meters)

-I.

-. 4- Th.

T

L*..1 t nlý

,

!

z.

.

!

!

!

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

I

I

..

..

.

t

.

I

,

I

I

I

I

I I

J

i

.

,

r

,llJh n

I

, .

,,I

I

I

t ' t . ..

. I

I

!

.

.

.

.

i n

.-

I

I

I I I I

I

I

.

.

.

..

_

I , , l i

,7 1

]

1

,

1 I I I I I I~l

,

~ ,

,

II

IIF

I]

!i III

if!

i .l

2-_-i N!

I

<

t

"

i

_-ý

7ýq

4_4


,,---

-

.

. . .

.

T -

1w4Thz4 GROUND LEVEL RELEASE

ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION FACTORS FOR

VARIOUS TIMES FOLLOWING ACCIDENTw TTW T I i I  ; I I

T

44

-3

3 _7.

-<J4jT2:

-8-24hours,:..

0V

U.

7 yjIIti;; :

Jfi.ti~

S4-34 days, týz5 L

1O2

163 Distance from structure (meters)

1.3-11

10-2

10-

10-

I I I-

- I 111r . I fý I I n if"ITF-1 I I I I I " ' H I ,

I

..

.. .. .. -.. .. -Il- 11 i

ý Llt"

ý r! " ý 4 PP f " rH

9 Ml

+ t E I + ý T ý I t -, -, I

t-11 -

-

I

10"

104 tj M-f i i-t

)-8 hours fl-

- .

-4--GROUND

LEVEL RELEASE

T

..,2

~~~

ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION

ATR

O

I'

VARIOUS TIMES FOLLOWING ACCIDENT

,T

t

{-0-8 hours

r71 V

.

-t

74*

-T4:+o r

~

74i

R.P

I

I! ii I

II -t----tt 4 -  t---t-t--t--rt-I-t1-1-i-r1--FrTLflTLHiL1iTh1Lu4i4 Tr KNL

+/-1--in

1-4 days T

1A

-4--.

4 T-- q

1

+1.1

4

4~

y~

- *

'.

4~

IIN

44'7

. .. . . . .. . .

.

-i4+/-AET'1Th12-rV

jL

1

4-4- I

-

"12% -t I

I

I

I

Ii A--

.

7:

4.,

-4 T'

4 L.L. A .LA L J





1 .

-

I I

I

I -

-

= -

-

- -

_______

Distance from S tructure (meters) 1

1.3-12

414

4.

-I-. Li

--

lU

E

.2

70~

10

10

17F;

I-.

-I-.

-4.-

-T

4-4 f T~

1 4

ý

I.

1 T-

--4

-i J  JJ LI I

41 rEtLI

L

1'

I -I-

-4

4+/-

-4+/-U

A

10

.

Al ff!

-

-5 L--

10

-T

-4-