ML050730119: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:12/10/03 WED 11:1.5 FAX Z,    _1
{{#Wiki_filter:12/10/03 WED 11:1.5 FAX Z
  .. 1 WLt -o0pd 6/12J02
_1  
.. 1 WLt -o0pd 6/12J02


==Dear President Busb:==
==Dear President Busb:==
Too ofen in our distated Founty we only act aer the fecL We ac not great at ntcipating problems. This is often seen in the aviation business and now we see It in our battle with terrorism.
Too ofen in our distated Founty we only act aer the fecL We ac not great at ntcipating problems. This is often seen in the aviation business and now we see It in our battle with terrorism.
We didn't get re-enfhad cockpit doors undil hljadtd plaes killed thousands. I think we now have the sae sitidoo but literally millions of limes scaier in the nuclear Industry. Do we necd to wait for peoplo to "storm the cockpit" of a nucle=r fciliry bcfore wc act?             . .t I havc nUt been an ani nuclear ac"vist But as a resident ofNew York I think t is                                                             i criminally mnd morally negligent (and feIel ta Is an iudestatemant) to no: have the military guarding the Indian Point suclear reactor. I Septcmbe II taught us anything it is ANYTHNG is possible. We can't hope our aenity problens ewey we must ACt We have, I read, about 100 nuclear reactors In this cow-by we must protect the= at all costs.
We didn't get re-enfhad cockpit doors undil hljadtd plaes killed thousands. I think we now have the sae sitidoo but literally millions of limes scaier in the nuclear Industry. Do we necd to wait for peoplo to "storm the cockpit" of a nucle=r fciliry bcfore wc act?  
We also must wind dowvthe nuclear indust*y. Put billions nto s track fuelcell energy distibution so we can fre ourselves toi                       awikt power. Yes, this will bc dvatating to te nuclcar business but it will create ajiggernaut of another business and It is In all our Interests.
.. t I havc nUt been an ani nuclear ac"vist But as a resident ofNew York I think t is criminally mnd morally negligent (and feIel ta Is an iudestatemant) to no: have the military guarding the Indian Point suclear reactor. I Septcmbe II taught us anything it is ANYTHNG is possible. We can't hope our aenity problens ewey we must ACt We have, I read, about 100 nuclear reactors In this cow-by we must protect the= at all costs.
Please [if' n'ot wali for 9/S1 x Thankyou forreading this                )t I
We also must wind dowv the nuclear indust*y. Put billions nto s track fuelcell energy distibution so we can fre ourselves toi awikt power. Yes, this will bc dvatating to te nuclcar business but it will create ajiggernaut of another business and It is In all our Interests.
jo 00     before we act. Be buld. Tunes bave changedl and supporterc wk                     you.
I Please [if' n'ot wali for 9/S1 x jo 00 before we act. Be buld. Tunes bave changedl
                                                                                                                                                        .I Bcst, "3
)t Thankyou forreading this and supporterc wk you.
DUrew Geenl A                     1     *.-.1     **.1.1       -       :
: Bcst, i
L..    .
.I ii I
                                . VIeI  P.4.       _-  .    , 1,           It ii
DUrew Geenl L..
                                            .. IJ 4"
"3 A
r~ . I.
1 *.-.1  
                                                            -~-                              . .                    ..-
**.1.1 - :
                                                                                                                          - .      a. .
I.
I.  -- t          .    -      .  . ~q. S Ilt         I, PIe r        '
-- t eI VI P.4.  
, 1, It
-~-
I J 4" ~ I.  
. r.
a.
. ~q I,
S Ilt PIe :
No:.,
No:.,
                                                                                                        .    .
i.
* i .     **
r pl ri
pl ri -
: IrmaJ,  
IrmaJ,
.1 Alv 1 4
                                                                                                                                        . Alv 14
. *. ;;a  
                        ;. .  *. ;;a
.~~~~~~~~~~.,
                                                                                                  .1
:..!:...jt AT;JYLI wiomationit Nsrecordwasde d In a
                                  .~~~~~~~~~~.,                           .*        :..!:...jt                                     AT;JYLI
-e a te ednjn o kifo ni
                                                                                                                                                      . I wiomationit Nsrecordwasde d Ina                      -e a teednjn okifo ni
/1 IIt.  
                                                                                                                                                            /1 IIt.                       .            . I,
.
I,


to EU - -.     Ex--4                                 *.
to EU - -.
Z      U,7x-17, 4.4, /Zhr--                                         9-as irtflms I"lrh 111lls IofJllr
Ex--4 Z
*- , -.. . - -I ... ;: -. 1 - --  .. .  .          .            .                                    I
U,7x-17, 4.4, /Zhr--
                                                                                              . I
9-
                                                                                            .C}}
-..as irt flms I" lrh 111lls IofJllr
-I 1
I I
.C}}

Latest revision as of 21:33, 15 January 2025

Letter to President Bush from D. Greenland, Re Whb 317012
ML050730119
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  
Issue date: 06/12/2002
From: Greenland D
- No Known Affiliation
To: Bush G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, US Executive Office of the President, Office of the White House Counsel
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0119, WHB 317012
Download: ML050730119 (2)
v • d • e


Text

12/10/03 WED 11:1.5 FAX Z

_1

.. 1 WLt -o0pd 6/12J02

Dear President Busb:

Too ofen in our distated Founty we only act aer the fecL We ac not great at ntcipating problems. This is often seen in the aviation business and now we see It in our battle with terrorism.

We didn't get re-enfhad cockpit doors undil hljadtd plaes killed thousands. I think we now have the sae sitidoo but literally millions of limes scaier in the nuclear Industry. Do we necd to wait for peoplo to "storm the cockpit" of a nucle=r fciliry bcfore wc act?

.. t I havc nUt been an ani nuclear ac"vist But as a resident ofNew York I think t is criminally mnd morally negligent (and feIel ta Is an iudestatemant) to no: have the military guarding the Indian Point suclear reactor. I Septcmbe II taught us anything it is ANYTHNG is possible. We can't hope our aenity problens ewey we must ACt We have, I read, about 100 nuclear reactors In this cow-by we must protect the= at all costs.

We also must wind dowv the nuclear indust*y. Put billions nto s track fuelcell energy distibution so we can fre ourselves toi awikt power. Yes, this will bc dvatating to te nuclcar business but it will create ajiggernaut of another business and It is In all our Interests.

I Please [if' n'ot wali for 9/S1 x jo 00 before we act. Be buld. Tunes bave changedl

)t Thankyou forreading this and supporterc wk you.

Bcst, i

.I ii I

DUrew Geenl L..

"3 A

1 *.-.1

    • .1.1 - :

I.

-- t eI VI P.4.

, 1, It

-~-

I J 4" ~ I.

. r.

a.

. ~q I,

S Ilt PIe :

No:.,

i.

r pl ri

IrmaJ,

.1 Alv 1 4

. *. ;;a

.~~~~~~~~~~.,

..!:...jt AT;JYLI wiomationit Nsrecordwasde d In a

-e a te ednjn o kifo ni

/1 IIt.

.

I,

to EU - -.

Ex--4 Z

U,7x-17, 4.4, /Zhr--

9-

-..as irt flms I" lrh 111lls IofJllr

-I 1

I I

.C

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML050730119&oldid=5387079"