ML081400821

Summary of Telephone Conference Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Related to the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, License Renewal Application - Status of Open Items

ML081400821
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	05/23/2008
From:	Kimberly Green NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR
To:
Green, Kimberly NRR/DLR/RLRB 415-1627
References
Download: ML081400821 (8)

Text

May 23, 2008 LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MAY 7, 2008, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., RELATED TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION STATUS OF OPEN ITEMS The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. (Entergy) held a telephone conference call on May 7, 2008, to obtain the status on open items related to reactor vessel surveillance and neutron embrittlement. By letter dated October 29, 2007, the NRC issued a request for additional information (RAI) on Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program and the Reactor Neutron Embrittlement Time-Limited Aging Analyses. Entergy responded by letter dated November 28, 2007. Subsequently, on December 3, and 4, 2007, the staff held telephone conference calls with the applicant to obtain clarification on the responses to the RAIs. At that time, Entergy committed to revise some of the responses. By letter dated January 17, 2008, Entergy submitted additional information; however, the staff identified a few issues that remained open pending the receipt of information from Entergy. The May 7, 2008, telephone conference call was useful in obtaining the status and proposed resolution of the open items.

provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the open items discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

\\RA\\

Kimberly Green, Safety Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/encl: See next page

ML081400821 OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR NAME SFigueroa KGreen RFranovich DATE 05/23/08 05/23/08 05/23/08

ENCLOSURE 1 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS MAY 7, 2008 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Kim Green U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Barry Elliot NRC Mike Stroud Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)

Alan Cox Entergy Ted Ivy Entergy Don Fronabarger Entergy Ron Finnin AREVA

ENCLOSURE 2 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION STATUS OF OPEN ITEMS May 7, 2008 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. held a telephone conference call on May 7, 2008, to obtain the status and proposed resolution of the open items related to reactor vessel surveillance and neutron embrittlement concerning the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3) license renewal application (LRA).

Open Item 4.2.1-1 In its January 17, 2008, response to RAI 4.2.1-1, the applicant identified the neutron fluxes assumed for all future operating cycles; however, the methodology for determining the neutron fluxes for the reactor vessel (RV) in IP2 was not identified.

Discussion:

Entergy stated that the methodology used for neutron fluence calculations is documented in the stretch power uprate submittal (WCAP-16157) on page 5.1-3. The staff will review the information in the WCAP report.

Open Item 4.2.1.3 LRA Sections A.2.2.1 and A.3.2.1 need to be revised based on the applicants response to RAI 4.2.1-1.

Discussion:

Entergy agreed to revise LRA Sections A.2.2.1 and A.3.2.1.

Open Item 4.2.2.2a In response to RAI 4.2.2-2, the applicant provided information for IP2 regarding fracture mechanics analyses and margins of safety against fracture equivalent to those required by Appendix G of Section XI of the ASME Code for beltline materials having CVUSE values below the screening limit of 50 ft-lb in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G. A similar analysis must be provided for the IP3 RV.

Discussion:

Entergy agreed to provide the requested analysis.

Open Item 4.2.2.2b The applicant cites as its equivalent margins analysis WCAP-13587, Rev. 1, which was developed using draft Regulatory Guide DG-1023, which has been superseded by Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.161, Evaluation of Reactor Pressure Vessels with Charpy Upper-Shelf Energy Less Than 50 ft-lb, and ASME Code Case N-512, which has since been incorporated into

Section XI of the ASME Code through the 2003 Addenda. However, the applicant had not previously requested approval for use of the WCAP report. To demonstrate that the methodology and criteria in the equivalent margins analyses (WCAP -13587, Rev. 1) for the IP2 and IP3 RVs are equivalent to the methodology and criteria in RG 1.161 and Appendix K of Section XI of the ASME Code, the applicant must compare and contrast the methodology and criteria in WCAP-13587, Rev. 1, for the IP2 and IP3 RVs to the methodology and criteria in RG 1.161 and Appendix K of Section XI of the ASME Code, 2001 Edition, 2003 Addenda.

Discussion:

The staff stated that if the use of the WCAP has not been formally requested, it is not part of the applicants current licensing basis (CLB). Therefore, the applicant will need to compare the analysis in the WCAP cited in the LRA with the methodology currently endorsed by the NRC in RG 1.161 and Appendix K to ASME Section XI. In a follow up phone call with Entergy, it stated that it will perform the comparison as requested.

Open Item 4.2.2.3 LRA Sections A.2.2.1.3 and A.3.2.1.3 contain summary descriptions of the applicants actions to address CvUSE; however, LRA Section A.3.2.1.3 needs to be revised to reflect the applicants response in its January 17, 2008, letter.

Discussion:

Entergy stated that the revised LRA Section A.3.2.1.3 is on page 21 of the response letter. The staff will review the cited information.

Open Item 4.2.4.3 LRA Section A.2.2.1.2 and A.3.2.1.2 contain summary descriptions of the TLAA evaluation of LTOP PORV setpoints; however, LRA Sections A.2.2.1.2 and A.3.2.1.2 need to be revised to discuss LTOP PORV setpoints.

Discussion:

Entergy agreed to revise the relevant LRA sections to include the requested discussion.

Open Item 4.2.5.2 Entergy has not identified the methodology used determining the impact of the different irradiation temperatures and different amounts of copper and nickel for the surveillance welds on the RTNDT and M values for the IP2 intermediate shell and lower axial shell welds.

Discussion:

Entergy stated that the information is contained in a WCAP report that will be submitted in the near future to support a license amendment request for P-T curves. Entergy indicated that it will either submit the WCAP in advance of the license amendment request or possibly include the requested information in separate correspondence.

Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations from K. Green, dated May 23, 2008 DISTRIBUTION:

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MAY 7, 2008, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., RELATED TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION STATUS OF OPEN ITEMS HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRpb1 RidsNrrDlrRpb2 RidsNrrDlrRer1 RidsNrrDlrRer2 RidsNrrDlrRerb RidsNrrDlrRpob RidsNrrDciCvib RidsNrrDciCpnb RidsNrrDraAfpb RidsNrrDraAplb RidsNrrDeEmcb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDssSrxb RidsNrrDssSbpb RidsNrrDssScvb RidsOgcMailCenter RFranovich EDacus, OCA BPham GMeyer, RI KGreen MMcLaughlin, RI JBoska NMcNamara, RI RAuluck DScrenci, RI OPA KChang NSheehan, RI OPA MKowal PCataldo, RI STurk, OGC CHott, RI LSubin, OGC DJackson, RI BMizuno, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA ECobey, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCox, RI TMensah, OEDO RConte, RI

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 cc:

Senior Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Vice President Oversight Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Senior Manager, Nuclear Safety &

Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Senior Vice President and COO Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Manager, Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Paul D. Tonko President and CEO New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. John P. Spath New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. Paul Eddy New York State Department of Public Service 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223-1350 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Senior Resident Inspectors Office Indian Point 2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 59 Buchanan, NY 10511 Senior Resident Inspectors Office Indian Point 3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 59 Buchanan, NY 10511 Mr. Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Mr. Raymond L. Albanese Four County Coordinator 200 Bradhurst Avenue Unit 4 Westchester County Hawthorne, NY 10532 Mayor, Village of Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511 Mr. William DiProfio PWR SRC Consultant 48 Bear Hill Road Newton, NH 03858

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 cc:

Mr. Garry Randolph PWR SRC Consultant 1750 Ben Franklin Drive, 7E Sarasota, FL 34236 Mr. William T. Russell PWR SRC Consultant 400 Plantation Lane Stevensville, MD 21666-3232 Mr. Jim Riccio Greenpeace 702 H Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Mr. Phillip Musegaas Riverkeeper, Inc.

828 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 Mr. Mark Jacobs IPSEC 46 Highland Drive Garrison, NY 10524 Mr. R. M. Waters Technical Specialist Licensing 450 Broadway P.O. Box 0249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Sherwood Martinelli 351 Dyckman Street Peekskill, NY 10566 Ms. Susan Shapiro, Esq.

21 Perlman Drive Spring Valley, NY 10977 Mr. John Sipos Assistant Attorney General New York State Department of Law Environmental Protection Bureau The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Robert Snook Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 Ms. Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Mr. Paul M. Bessette, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Mr. Martin J. ONeill, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 The Honorable Nita Lowey 222 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 310 White Plains, NY 10605 Ms. Joan Leary Matthews Senior Counsel for Special Projects Office of General Counsel NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-5500