ML101170739: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Carrion, Robert From: Carrion, Robert Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:23 AM To: Lake, Louis  
{{#Wiki_filter:Carrion, Robert From:
Carrion, Robert Sent:
Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:23 AM To:
Lake, Louis


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
SIT Sataus Call Hi Lou, From the information which Garry presented, I think that Progress has arrived at the proper conclusion with respect to the repair. I am sure that it was not what they had hoped due to the extra time required to effect the fix. I think that the way Progress has handled this entire event should be seen a big positive for its management.
SIT Sataus Call Hi Lou, From the information which Garry presented, I think that Progress has arrived at the proper conclusion with respect to the repair. I am sure that it was not what they had hoped due to the extra time required to effect the fix. I think that the way Progress has handled this entire event should be seen a big positive for its management.
Do you know the specifics for the status call? Time, etc.?Thanks, Bob}}
Do you know the specifics for the status call? Time, etc.?
: Thanks, Bob}}

Latest revision as of 05:25, 14 January 2025

E-Mail from Carrion to Lake, SIT Status Call
ML101170739
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/18/2009
From: Robert Carrion
NRC/RGN-II
To: Lake L
NRC/RGN-II
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0116
Download: ML101170739 (1)


Text

Carrion, Robert From:

Carrion, Robert Sent:

Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:23 AM To:

Lake, Louis

Subject:

SIT Sataus Call Hi Lou, From the information which Garry presented, I think that Progress has arrived at the proper conclusion with respect to the repair. I am sure that it was not what they had hoped due to the extra time required to effect the fix. I think that the way Progress has handled this entire event should be seen a big positive for its management.

Do you know the specifics for the status call? Time, etc.?

Thanks, Bob