ML102310183: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML102310183 | | number = ML102310183 | ||
| issue date = 08/19/2010 | | issue date = 08/19/2010 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review Email - License Amendment Request for Cyber Security Plan | | title = Acceptance Review Email - License Amendment Request for Cyber Security Plan | ||
| author name = Kalyanam N | | author name = Kalyanam N | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: | ||
Kalyanam, Kaly Sent: | |||
Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:52 AM To: | |||
BICE, DAVID B; mgiles@entergy.com Cc: | |||
mgiles@entergy.com; Boyle, Patrick; Lingam, Siva; Burkhardt, Janet; Lent, Susan | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review Result for ANO-1 and 2 Cyber Security Amendment Request | Acceptance Review Result for ANO-1 and 2 Cyber Security Amendment Request | ||
: Dave, By letter dated July 9, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML102240048), Entergy Operations Inc. | : Dave, By {{letter dated|date=July 9, 2010|text=letter dated July 9, 2010}} (ADAMS Accession No. ML102240048), Entergy Operations Inc. | ||
submitted a license amendment request for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2,(ANO-1 and 2). The proposed amendment requested approval of the ANO-1 and 2 Cyber Security Plan. | submitted a license amendment request for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2,(ANO-1 and 2). The proposed amendment requested approval of the ANO-1 and 2 Cyber Security Plan. | ||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 32: | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1480. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1480. | ||
Kaly N. Kalyanam , Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E-mail Properties | Kaly N. Kalyanam, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E-mail Properties | ||
Mail Envelope Properties (94A2A4408AC65F42AC084527534CF4160F30C411EE) | Mail Envelope Properties (94A2A4408AC65F42AC084527534CF4160F30C411EE) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review Result for ANO-1 and 2 Cyber Security Amendment Request Sent Date: | Acceptance Review Result for ANO-1 and 2 Cyber Security Amendment Request Sent Date: 8/19/2010 8:52:31 AM Received Date: 8/19/2010 8:52:31 AM From: Kalyanam, Kaly Created By: Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
DBICE@entergy.com (BICE, DAVID B) | DBICE@entergy.com (BICE, DAVID B) | ||
Tracking Status: None mgiles@entergy.com (mgiles@entergy.com) | Tracking Status: None mgiles@entergy.com (mgiles@entergy.com) | ||
| Line 42: | Line 46: | ||
Tracking Status: None Susan.Lent@nrc.gov (Lent, Susan) | Tracking Status: None Susan.Lent@nrc.gov (Lent, Susan) | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files | HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 10473 8/19/2010 Options Expiration Date: | ||
Priority: | Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:}} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:18, 14 January 2025
| ML102310183 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 08/19/2010 |
| From: | Kalyanam N Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | David Bice Entergy Operations |
| Kalyanam N, NRR/DORL/LP4, 415-1480 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME4424, TAC ME4425 | |
| Download: ML102310183 (2) | |
Text
From:
Kalyanam, Kaly Sent:
Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:52 AM To:
BICE, DAVID B; mgiles@entergy.com Cc:
mgiles@entergy.com; Boyle, Patrick; Lingam, Siva; Burkhardt, Janet; Lent, Susan
Subject:
Acceptance Review Result for ANO-1 and 2 Cyber Security Amendment Request
- Dave, By letter dated July 9, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML102240048), Entergy Operations Inc.
submitted a license amendment request for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2,(ANO-1 and 2). The proposed amendment requested approval of the ANO-1 and 2 Cyber Security Plan.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1480.
Kaly N. Kalyanam, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E-mail Properties
Mail Envelope Properties (94A2A4408AC65F42AC084527534CF4160F30C411EE)
Subject:
Acceptance Review Result for ANO-1 and 2 Cyber Security Amendment Request Sent Date: 8/19/2010 8:52:31 AM Received Date: 8/19/2010 8:52:31 AM From: Kalyanam, Kaly Created By: Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov Recipients:
DBICE@entergy.com (BICE, DAVID B)
Tracking Status: None mgiles@entergy.com (mgiles@entergy.com)
Tracking Status: None mgiles@entergy.com (mgiles@entergy.com)
Tracking Status: None Patrick.Boyle@nrc.gov (Boyle, Patrick)
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)
Tracking Status: None Janet.Burkhardt@nrc.gov (Burkhardt, Janet)
Tracking Status: None Susan.Lent@nrc.gov (Lent, Susan)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 10473 8/19/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: