ML12089A605: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ENT000343
{{#Wiki_filter:ENT000343  
                                                                            Submitted: March 29, 2012
Submitted: March 29, 2012
                                            UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES  
                                NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
                                                REGION I
REGION I  
                                          475 ALLENDALE ROAD
Mr. Joseph Pollock  
                                      KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1415
Site Vice President  
                                                  October 19, 2009
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.  
Mr. Joseph Pollock
Indian Point Energy Center  
Site Vice President
450 Broadway, GSB  
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
P.O. Box 249  
Indian Point Energy Center
Buchanan, NY 10511-0249  
450 Broadway, GSB
475 ALLENDALE ROAD
P.O. Box 249
KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1415
Buchanan, NY 10511-0249
October 19, 2009
SUBJECT:       INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 1, 2 & 3 - NRC INSPECTION
SUBJECT:  
                REPORT NOS. 05000003/2009008 ; 05000247/2009008; AND
INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 1, 2 & 3 - NRC INSPECTION  
                05000286/2009008
REPORT NOS. 05000003/2009008; 05000247/2009008; AND  
Dear Mr. Pollock:
05000286/2009008  
On September 4, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an
Dear Mr. Pollock:  
inspection at Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 1, 2, & 3. The enclosed report documents
On September 4, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an  
the inspection results, which were discussed on August 19 and September 4, 2009, with Mr. Don
inspection at Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 1, 2, & 3. The enclosed report documents  
Mayer and other members of your staff.
the inspection results, which were discussed on August 19 and September 4, 2009, with Mr. Don  
The purpose of this inspection was to assess the establishment, implementation, and
Mayer and other members of your staff.  
maintenance of your Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Program ; review the circumstances
The purpose of this inspection was to assess the establishment, implementation, and  
surrounding a previously identified occurrence involving the detection of tritated water in a Unit 3
maintenance of your Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Program; review the circumstances  
storm drain system; review the performance of the site's Radiation Monitoring System; and
surrounding a previously identified occurrence involving the detection of tritated water in a Unit 3  
inspect and assess your performance relative to radiological effluents monitoring and control.
storm drain system; review the performance of the site's Radiation Monitoring System; and  
The inspection involved an examination of activities conducted under Entergy's license as
inspect and assess your performance relative to radiological effluents monitoring and control.  
related to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the
The inspection involved an examination of activities conducted under Entergy's license as  
conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selected
related to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the  
examination of procedures and representative records, observations of activities, interviews with
conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selected  
personnel, and independent assessment activities.
examination of procedures and representative records, observations of activities, interviews with  
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified . Further, the
personnel, and independent assessment activities.  
inspectors determined that Entergy's Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Program for the .lndian
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. Further, the  
Point Energy Center was effectively implemented and maintained in a manner that provided
inspectors determined that Entergy's Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Program for the .lndian  
continued radiological monitoring of the groundwater conditions to confirm conformance with
Point Energy Center was effectively implemented and maintained in a manner that provided  
NRC regulatory requirements relative to the maintenance of public health and safety, and
continued radiological monitoring of the groundwater conditions to confirm conformance with  
protection of the environment.
NRC regulatory requirements relative to the maintenance of public health and safety, and  
Since 2005, as approved by NRC's Executive Director of Operations, Region I conducted
protection of the environment.  
frequent and focused reviews of your groundwater investigation activities and long-term
Since 2005, as approved by NRC's Executive Director of Operations, Region I conducted  
monitoring program that exceeded the scope of NRC's normal baseline inspection program. As
frequent and focused reviews of your groundwater investigation activities and long-term  
a result, we have developed confidence in your commitment and ability to continue effective
monitoring program that exceeded the scope of NRC's normal baseline inspection program. As  
monitoring and assessment of the on-site conditions to assure the maintenance of
a result, we have developed confidence in your commitment and ability to continue effective  
monitoring and assessment of the on-site conditions to assure the maintenance of  


J. Pollock                                     2
J. Pollock  
public health and safety, protection of the environment, and conformance with NRC regulatory
2  
requirements. Our inspectors confirmed that the objectives specified in our deviation
public health and safety, protection of the environment, and conformance with NRC regulatory  
memorandum dated December 16,2008 (ML083590057) have been satisfied. However, we will
requirements. Our inspectors confirmed that the objectives specified in our deviation  
continue to monitor your performance in this area, and will re-assess the need for continued
memorandum dated December 16,2008 (ML083590057) have been satisfied. However, we will  
heightened inspection oversight during our end-of-cycle review of your CY 2009 perfonmance.
continue to monitor your performance in this area, and will re-assess the need for continued  
In accordance with 10 CFR2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
heightened inspection oversight during our end-of-cycle review of your CY 2009 perfonmance.  
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room
In accordance with 10 CFR2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its  
or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room  
or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system  
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
                                  J);W~
J);W~  
                                      Darrell J. Roberts, Director
Darrell J. Roberts, Director  
                                      Division of Reactor Safety
Division of Reactor Safety  
Docket Nos: 50-003, 50-247, 50-286
Docket Nos:  
License Nos: DPR-5, DPR-26, DPR-64
50-003, 50-247, 50-286  
Enclosure:     Inspection Report Nos. 05000003/2009008, 05000247/2009008,
License Nos: DPR-5, DPR-26, DPR-64  
              05000286/2009008
Enclosure:  
                  w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
Inspection Report Nos. 05000003/2009008, 05000247/2009008,  
cc w/encj: Distribution via ListServ
05000286/2009008  
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information  
cc w/encj: Distribution via ListServ  


              J. Pollock                                                     2
J. Pollock  
              public health and safety, protection of the environment, and conformance with NRC regulatory
2  
              requirements . Our inspectors confirmed that the objectives specified in our deviation
public health and safety, protection of the environment, and conformance with NRC regulatory  
              memorandum dated December 16, 2008 (ML083590057) have been satisfied. However, we will
requirements. Our inspectors confirmed that the objectives specified in our deviation  
              continue to monitor your performance in this area, and will re-assess the need for continued
memorandum dated December 16, 2008 (ML083590057) have been satisfied. However, we will  
              heightened inspection oversight during our end-of-cycle review of your CY 2009 performance.
continue to monitor your performance in this area, and will re-assess the need for continued  
              In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
heightened inspection oversight during our end-of-cycle review of your CY 2009 performance.  
              enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in.the NRC Public Document Room
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its  
              or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in. the NRC Public Document Room  
              (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at hllp:llwww.nrc.gov/reading-
or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system  
              rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at hllp:llwww.nrc.gov/reading-
                                                                    Sincerely,
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
                                                                    IRA by Peter R. Wilson forI
Sincerely,  
                                                                    Darrell J. Roberts, Director
IRA by Peter R. Wilson forI  
                                                                    Division of Reactor Safety
Darrell J. Roberts, Director  
              Docket Nos: 50-003, 50-247, 50-286
Division of Reactor Safety  
              License Nos: DPR-5, DPR-26, DPR-64
Docket Nos:  
              Enclosure:         Inspection Report Nos. 05000003/2009008, 05000247/2009008,
50-003, 50-247, 50-286  
                                  05000286/2009008
License Nos: DPR-5, DPR-26, DPR-64  
                                      w/Allachment: Supplemental Information
Enclosure:  
              cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ
Inspection Report Nos. 05000003/2009008, 05000247/2009008,  
              Distribution w/encl: (via E-mail)                                         S. McCarver, DRP
05000286/2009008  
              S. Collins, RA (R10RAMAIL RESOURCE)                                       G. Malone, DRP, Senior Resident Inspector
w/Allachment: Supplemental Information  
              M. Dapas, DRA (R10RAMAIL                                                       - Indian Point 2
cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ  
                      RESOURCE)                                                         D. Hochmuth , DRP
Distribution w/encl: (via E-mail)  
              D. Lew, DRP (R1 DRPMAIL RESOURCE)                                         D. Bearde, DRP
S. Collins, RA (R10RAMAIL RESOURCE)  
              J. Clifford, DRP (R1DRPMAIL                                                Region I Docket Room (w/concurrences)
M. Dapas, DRA (R10RAMAIL  
                      RESOURCE)                                                          ROPreport Resource
RESOURCE)  
              L. Trocine, Ri OEDO                                                        D. Roberts , DRS
D. Lew, DRP (R1 DRPMAIL RESOURCE)
              RIDSNRRPMINDIANPOINTRESOURCE                                              P. Wilson, DRS
J. Clifford, DRP (R1DRPMAIL
              B. Welling, DRP                                                            J. White, DRS
RESOURCE)  
              B. Bickell, DRP
L. Trocine, Ri OEDO
SUNSI Review Complete:         JRW             (Reviewer's Inrtials)
RIDSNRRPMINDIANPOINTRESOURCE
OOCUMENT NAME: G:IORSIPlant Support Branch 2INoggleIIP2009008Rev1 .doc
B. Welling, DRP
After declaring this document ~An Official Agency Record w it will be rel eased to the Public.
B. Bickell, DRP
To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "e" = COpy without attachment/enclosure "E" = COpy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No CQP"y
S. McCarver, DRP
OFFICE                 RIIDRS               I     RES                     I     RIIDRS           I   RIIDRP         I     RIIDRS               I
G. Malone, DRP, Senior Resident Inspector
NAME                   JNoggle/JDN               TNicholsonltjn                 JWhite/jrw' ehg       BWeliinglBW           DRoberts/prw for
- Indian Point 2
                                                  (telecon)                       for'
D. Hochmuth, DRP  
DATE                   10/06/09                   10/14/09                         10/19/09             10/16/09             10/16/09
D. Bearde, DRP  
                *see pnor concurrence                             OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Region I Docket Room (w/concurrences)  
ROPreport Resource  
D. Roberts, DRS  
P. Wilson, DRS  
J. White, DRS  
SUNSI Review Complete:  
JRW  
(Reviewer's Inrtials)  
OOCUMENT NAME: G:IORSIPlant Support Branch 2INoggleIIP2009008Rev1 .doc  
After declaring this document ~An Official Agency Record w it will be released to the Public.  
To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "e" = COpy without attachment/enclosure "E" = COpy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No CQP"y  
OFFICE  
RIIDRS  
I  
RES  
I  
RIIDRS  
I  
RIIDRP  
I  
RIIDRS  
I  
NAME  
JNoggle/JDN  
TNicholsonltjn  
JWhite/jrw' ehg  
BWeliinglBW  
DRoberts/prw for  
(telecon)  
for'  
DATE  
10/06/09  
10/14/09  
10/19/09  
10/16/09  
10/16/09  
* see pnor concurrence  
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY  


                U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Docket Nos.
                                  REGION I
License Nos.
Docket Nos.  50-003 , 50-247, 50-286
Report Nos.
License Nos. DPR-3, DPR-26, DPR-64
Licensee:
Report Nos.  05000003/2009008, 05000247/2009008, and 05000286/2009008
Facility:
Licensee:    Entergy Nuclear Northeast
Location:
Facility:    Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, & 3
Dates: .
Location:    295 Broadway
Inspectors:
            Buchanan, NY 10511-0308
Approved by:
Dates: .    Augusr18, 2009 - September 4, 2009
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
Inspectors:  J. Noggle, Sr. Health Physicist, CHP, team leader
REGION I  
            T. Nicholson, Sr. Technical Advisor for Radionuclide Transport
50-003, 50-247, 50-286  
            J. Williams, U.S. Geological Survey, Troy, New York
DPR-3, DPR-26, DPR-64  
Approved by: John R. White, Chief
05000003/2009008, 05000247/2009008, and 05000286/2009008  
            Plant Support Branch 2
Entergy Nuclear Northeast  
            Division of Reactor Safety
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, & 3  
                                                                            Enclosure
295 Broadway  
Buchanan, NY 10511-0308  
Augusr18, 2009 - September 4, 2009  
J. Noggle, Sr. Health Physicist, CHP, team leader  
T. Nicholson, Sr. Technical Advisor for Radionuclide Transport  
J. Williams, U.S. Geological Survey, Troy, New York  
John R. White, Chief  
Plant Support Branch 2  
Division of Reactor Safety  
Enclosure  


                                    SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS  
IR 05000003/2009008, IR 05000247/2009008, IR 05000286/2009008; 08/18/2009 - 9/04/2009;
IR 05000003/2009008, IR 05000247/2009008, IR 05000286/2009008; 08/18/2009 - 9/04/2009;  
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2 & 3; Other Activities - associated with ROP
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2 & 3; Other Activities - associated with ROP  
deviation memorandum, one PI&R sample, and radioactive effluents baseline inspection.
deviation memorandum, one PI&R sample, and radioactive effluents baseline inspection.  
No findings of significance were identified. The report covers the period from August 18 through
No findings of significance were identified. The report covers the period from August 18 through  
September 4, 2009, and discusses inspection activities conducted by a region-based inspector,
September 4, 2009, and discusses inspection activities conducted by a region-based inspector,  
and an inspection team comprised of representatives of Region I, NRC's Office of Research,
and an inspection team comprised of representatives of Region I, NRC's Office of Research,  
and the U. S. Geological Survey. The inspection provided bases for the NRC to determine that
and the U. S. Geological Survey. The inspection provided bases for the NRC to determine that  
Entergy had completed actions necessary to satisfy the objectives delineated in our deviation
Entergy had completed actions necessary to satisfy the objectives delineated in our deviation  
memorandum, "Request for Renewal of Deviation to the Action Matrix to Provide Heightened
memorandum, "Request for Renewal of Deviation to the Action Matrix to Provide Heightened  
NRC Oversight of the Onsite Groundwater Monitoring at the Indian Point Energy Center,"
NRC Oversight of the Onsite Groundwater Monitoring at the Indian Point Energy Center,"  
(ML083590057), dated December 16,2008. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe
(ML083590057), dated December 16,2008. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe  
operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor
operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor  
Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.
Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.  
                                                ii
ii  
                                                                                        Enclosure
Enclosure  


                                          Report Details
Report Details  
2.     RADIATION SAFETY
2.  
      Cornerstone: Public Radiation Safety (PS)
RADIATION SAFETY  
2PS1   Gaseous and Liguid Effluents (71122.01 - 3 samples)
Cornerstone: Public Radiation Safety (PS)  
a.   Inspection Scope
2PS1 Gaseous and Liguid Effluents (71122.01 - 3 samples)  
    1) The inspector reviewed the following documents to evaluate the effectiveness of the
a.  
      licensee's radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent control programs relative to the
Inspection Scope  
      applicable regulatory requirements specified in the Technical Specifications and the
1) The inspector reviewed the following documents to evaluate the effectiveness of the  
      Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (TS/ODCM).
licensee's radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent control programs relative to the  
          *     The 2007 and 2008 Radiological Annual Effluent Release Reports were
applicable regulatory requirements specified in the Technical Specifications and the  
                reviewed including independently assessing selected public dose calculations.
Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (TS/ODCM).  
                There were no anomalous results reported in these two reports . The report
*  
                included discussion of current groundwater conditions and the result of required
The 2007 and 2008 Radiological Annual Effluent Release Reports were  
                monitoring activities; and instances involving out-of-service radiation monitors or
reviewed including independently assessing selected public dose calculations.  
                effluent release flow rate monitors were listed in the reports and these were
There were no anomalous results reported in these two reports. The report  
                evaluated during this inspection.
included discussion of current groundwater conditions and the result of required  
          *     The current ODCM was reviewed, including technical justifications for any
monitoring activities; and instances involving out-of-service radiation monitors or  
                changes made since the previous revision.
effluent release flow rate monitors were listed in the reports and these were  
          *     Applicable sections of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) were
evaluated during this inspection.  
                reviewed to verify the adequacy of system descriptions for gaseous radioactive
*  
                waste and station ventilation systems.
The current ODCM was reviewed, including technical justifications for any  
          *     The latest quality assurance audits of radioactive effluents and chemistry were
changes made since the previous revision.  
                reviewed, including Entergy's program for identifying, controlling and assessing
*  
                potential contaminated spills and leakage.
Applicable sections of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) were  
          *     There were no measurable effluent releases to the environment based on off-site
reviewed to verify the adequacy of system descriptions for gaseous radioactive  
                dose calculations, and there were no reported off-site environmental sample
waste and station ventilation systems.  
                measurements identifying plant-related radioactive materials during the 2007 and
*  
                2008 report period.
The latest quality assurance audits of radioactive effluents and chemistry were  
    2) The inspector observed the following plant equipment and work activities to evaluate the
reviewed, including Entergy's program for identifying, controlling and assessing  
      effectiveness of the licensee's radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent control programs.
potential contaminated spills and leakage.  
          *     Walkdowns were performed of accessible gaseous and liquid release system
*  
                components to review any recent changes or modifications; and to confirm the
There were no measurable effluent releases to the environment based on off-site  
                alignment, operation and material condition of the radioactive liquid and
dose calculations, and there were no reported off-site environmental sample  
                gaseous effluent radiation monitoring systems (RMS) at Units 1, 2 and 3.
measurements identifying plant-related radioactive materials during the 2007 and  
          *     Observations were conducted of radioactive effluent related sampling and
2008 report period.  
                associated laboratory measurement techniques.
2) The inspector observed the following plant equipment and work activities to evaluate the  
          *     Procedural controls and selected radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent release
effectiveness of the licensee's radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent control programs.  
                permits were reviewed to verify that radiation monitor alarm setpoint values and
*  
                releases were in agreement with Technical Specification and ODCM
Walkdowns were performed of accessible gaseous and liquid release system  
                requirements.
components to review any recent changes or modifications; and to confirm the  
                                                                                        Enclosure
alignment, operation and material condition of the radioactive liquid and  
gaseous effluent radiation monitoring systems (RMS) at Units 1, 2 and 3.  
*  
Observations were conducted of radioactive effluent related sampling and  
associated laboratory measurement techniques.  
*  
Procedural controls and selected radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent release  
permits were reviewed to verify that radiation monitor alarm setpoint values and  
releases were in agreement with Technical Specification and ODCM  
requirements.  
Enclosure  


                                                      2
2  
            *     Chemistry logs, relative to out-of-service radiation monitoring conditions, were
*  
                  reviewed to confirm the performance of compensatory sampling activities.
Chemistry logs, relative to out-of-service radiation monitoring conditions, were  
            *   Surveillance tests of gaseous filtration discharge systems were reviewed to
reviewed to confirm the performance of compensatory sampling activities.  
                  confirm operability and ventilation flow rates with respect to the assumed flow
*  
                  rates used in gaseous effluent release calculations.
Surveillance tests of gaseous filtration discharge systems were reviewed to  
            *     Entergy's surveillance program of non-radioactive system interfaces with
confirm operability and ventilation flow rates with respect to the assumed flow  
                  radioactive process systems was reviewed to confirm effective monitoring and
rates used in gaseous effluent release calculations.  
                control of potential effluent discharge paths to the environment.
*  
            *     Radiation monitoring system and chemistry laboratory counting instrument
Entergy's surveillance program of non-radioactive system interfaces with  
                calibration and quality control records were reviewed with respect to ODCM
radioactive process systems was reviewed to confirm effective monitoring and  
                surveillance requirements to confirm the licensee's ability identify and report
control of potential effluent discharge paths to the environment.  
                detectable radionuclides in radioactive measurement results.
*  
    3) Radioactive effluent control related corrective action program activities for 2007 through
Radiation monitoring system and chemistry laboratory counting instrument  
        August 2009 were reviewed, including the results of audits and the resolution of issues
calibration and quality control records were reviewed with respect to ODCM  
        identified through the condition report system. A comprehensive review was conducted
surveillance requirements to confirm the licensee's ability identify and report  
        of conditions and occurrences involving out-of-service radiation monitoring system
detectable radionuclides in radioactive measurement results.  
        components. Section 40A2 pertains.
3) Radioactive effluent control related corrective action program activities for 2007 through  
  b.   Findings and Observations
August 2009 were reviewed, including the results of audits and the resolution of issues  
        No findings of significance were identified. The following table summarizes the dose
identified through the condition report system. A comprehensive review was conducted  
        consequence of radiological effluent release in the period between 2007 and 2008.
of conditions and occurrences involving out-of-service radiation monitoring system  
        Table of Effluent Release calculated dose and public dose limits for 2007 and 2008
components. Section 40A2 pertains.  
          Dose in         Air Dose     %of     Air Dose     %of     liquid     '10 of Liquid     %of
b.  
          mrem/yr         Whole       limit   Max Organ   Limit   Dose       limit Dose       limit
Findings and Observations  
                            Body                                       WB               MaxO
No findings of significance were identified. The following table summarizes the dose  
2007       Units 1&2       2.43E-3     0.016   2.43E-3     0.016   5.35E-4   0.018   1.3E-3   0.013
consequence of radiological effluent release in the period between 2007 and 2008.  
2008       Units 1&2       2.07E-3     0.014   2.67E-3     0.018   6.11E-4   0.020   1.47E-3   0.Q15
Table of Effluent Release calculated dose and public dose limits for 2007 and 2008  
2007       Unit 3           3.BBE-3     0.026   3.BBE-3     0.026   3.2E-4   0.007   2.14E-4   0.002
Dose in  
2008       Unit 3           1.99E-3     0.013   1.99E-3     0.013   1.56E-4   0.005   2.B3E-4   0.003
Air Dose  
2007       Groundwater                                                 2.66E-4   0.009   9.94E-4   0.01
%of  
2008       Groundwater                                                 2.86E-4   0.009   9.35E-4   0.009
Air Dose  
4.     OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
%of  
40A2 Identification and Resolution of Problems
liquid  
        Cornerstone: Public Radiation Safety
'10 of  
.1     Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems
Liquid  
  a.   Inspection Scope (71122.01)
%of  
        The inspector reviewed approximately one hundred corrective action condition reports,
mrem/yr  
        initiated between january 2007 and August 2009, that were associated with the gaseous,
Whole  
        liquid, and groundwater radioactive effluents program. The review was performed to
limit  
                                                                                            Enclosure
Max Organ  
Limit  
Dose  
limit  
Dose  
limit  
Body  
WB  
MaxO  
2007  
Units 1&2  
2.43E-3  
0.016  
2.43E-3  
0.016  
5.35E-4  
0.018  
1.3E-3  
0.013  
2008  
Units 1&2  
2.07E-3  
0.014  
2.67E-3  
0.018  
6.11E-4  
0.020  
1.47E-3  
0.Q15  
2007  
Unit 3  
3.BBE-3  
0.026  
3.BBE-3  
0.026  
3.2E-4  
0.007  
2.14E-4  
0.002  
2008  
Unit 3  
1.99E-3  
0.013  
1.99E-3  
0.013  
1.56E-4  
0.005  
2.B3E-4  
0.003  
2007  
Groundwater  
2.66E-4  
0.009  
9.94E-4  
0.01  
2008  
Groundwater  
2.86E-4  
0.009  
9.35E-4  
0.009  
4.  
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)  
40A2 Identification and Resolution of Problems  
Cornerstone: Public Radiation Safety  
.1  
Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems  
a.  
Inspection Scope (71122.01)  
The inspector reviewed approximately one hundred corrective action condition reports,  
initiated between january 2007 and August 2009, that were associated with the gaseous,  
liquid, and groundwater radioactive effluents program. The review was performed to  
Enclosure  


                                                3
3  
      verify that problems identified by these condition reports were properly characterized in
verify that problems identified by these condition reports were properly characterized in  
      the licensee's event reporting system, causes were identified, and actions implemented
the licensee's event reporting system, causes were identified, and actions implemented  
      commensurate the safety significance of the matters.
commensurate the safety significance of the matters.  
  b. Findings and Observations
b.  
      No findings of significance were identified .
Findings and Observations  
.2   Radioactive Effluent Radiation Monitor System (RMS) Maintenance (71152 - 1 sample)
No findings of significance were identified .  
  a. Inspection Scope
. 2  
      The inspectors conducted a review corrective action program condition reports
Radioactive Effluent Radiation Monitor System (RMS) Maintenance (71152 - 1 sample)  
      associated with out-of-service radiation monitoring system equipment that was identified
a.  
      in the period between January 2007 and August 2009. Licensee personnel having
Inspection Scope  
      cognizance of Radiation Monitoring System (RMS) performance and activities were
The inspectors conducted a review corrective action program condition reports  
      interviewed, including the RMS system engineer and senior chemistry staff. "Radiation
associated with out-of-service radiation monitoring system equipment that was identified  
      Monitoring System, Second Quarter 2009, Condition Report Trend Review for Radiation .
in the period between January 2007 and August 2009. Licensee personnel having  
      Monitoring System Improvement: dated September 2, 2009, was also reviewed.
cognizance of Radiation Monitoring System (RMS) performance and activities were  
  b. Findings and Observations
interviewed, including the RMS system engineer and senior chemistry staff. "Radiation  
      No findings of Significance were identified.
Monitoring System, Second Quarter 2009, Condition Report Trend Review for Radiation .  
      A large number of condition reports associated with the radiation monitoring system were
Monitoring System Improvement: dated September 2, 2009, was also reviewed.  
      initiated during the past two years . Most of the condition reports were associated with
b.  
      interruption of service of the RMS display consoles in both the Unit 2 and Unit 3 control
Findings and Observations  
      rooms. While these temporary display outages affected operators' ability to poll
No findings of Significance were identified.  
      individual detector readout displays, they did not interfere with control room annunciator
A large number of condition reports associated with the radiation monitoring system were  
      actuation or actual detector operability.
initiated during the past two years. Most of the condition reports were associated with  
      The cause of the Unit 3 display console issues was determined to be related to
interruption of service of the RMS display consoles in both the Unit 2 and Unit 3 control  
      excessive temperature in the RMS electronics cabinets that affected certain control room
rooms. While these temporary display outages affected operators' ability to poll  
      RMS display console components. Short-term corrective actions included installing
individual detector readout displays, they did not interfere with control room annunciator  
      permanent air conditioning to effect improved cooling of the RMS electronics cabinets.
actuation or actual detector operability.  
      The cause of Unit 2 RMS display console service interruptions continues to be under
The cause of the Unit 3 display console issues was determined to be related to  
      review. Notwithstanding, Entergy is evaluating replacing the RMS display console
excessive temperature in the RMS electronics cabinets that affected certain control room  
      equipment in both control rooms to support station-wide computer network access
RMS display console components. Short-term corrective actions included installing  
      improvements.
permanent air conditioning to effect improved cooling of the RMS electronics cabinets.  
      Less frequently occurring RMS equipment issues remain to be resolved, including
The cause of Unit 2 RMS display console service interruptions continues to be under  
      occurrences involving the R-56 detectors, which monitor the discharge of waste sewage
review. Notwithstanding, Entergy is evaluating replacing the RMS display console  
      from Units 2 and 3. The location of these detectors was determined to be susceptible to
equipment in both control rooms to support station-wide computer network access  
      failure due to flooding , power spiking, and power outages. In such conditions, waste
improvements.  
      sewage is diverted to an on-site holding tank in order to conduct sampling prior to off-site
Less frequently occurring RMS equipment issues remain to be resolved, including  
      release . Accordingly, there is no safety significance to these RMS system failures. The
occurrences involving the R-56 detectors, which monitor the discharge of waste sewage  
      inspector confirmed that the licensee has implemented appropriate remedial actions for
from Units 2 and 3. The location of these detectors was determined to be susceptible to  
      these occurrences, and has initiated actions to improve the operating environment and
failure due to flooding, power spiking, and power outages. In such conditions, waste  
      detector function to reduce the out-of-service time.
sewage is diverted to an on-site holding tank in order to conduct sampling prior to off-site  
                                                                                        Enclosure
release. Accordingly, there is no safety significance to these RMS system failures. The  
inspector confirmed that the licensee has implemented appropriate remedial actions for  
these occurrences, and has initiated actions to improve the operating environment and  
detector function to reduce the out-of-service time.  
Enclosure  


                                                  4
4  
      Entergy has identified the Unit 2 RMS as an upgrade project in its Top Ten Action Plan
Entergy has identified the Unit 2 RMS as an upgrade project in its Top Ten Action Plan  
      for 2009. System engineering activities have been initiated for this improvement activity.
for 2009. System engineering activities have been initiated for this improvement activity.  
      The inspector determined that the majority of identified problems with the Unit 2 and Unit
The inspector determined that the majority of identified problems with the Unit 2 and Unit  
      3 radiation monitoring systems were not associated with radiation detector operability or
3 radiation monitoring systems were not associated with radiation detector operability or  
      effluent release control functions. For those instances that resulted in out-of-service
effluent release control functions. For those instances that resulted in out-of-service  
      conditions, the licensee implemented appropriate compensatory measures as required
conditions, the licensee implemented appropriate compensatory measures as required  
      by regulatory requirements. The inspector confirmed that Entergy is engaged in RMS
by regulatory requirements. The inspector confirmed that Entergy is engaged in RMS  
    . improvement activities, and has initiated appropriate corrective actions.
. improvement activities, and has initiated appropriate corrective actions.  
40A5 Other Activities
40A5 Other Activities  
.1   Assessment of Licensee Performance Relative to Meeting the Objectives of the
.1  
      December 16.2008 Memorandum Reguesting Deviation from the Action Matrix
Assessment of Licensee Performance Relative to Meeting the Objectives of the  
      Background:
December 16.2008 Memorandum Reguesting Deviation from the Action Matrix  
      On September 1, 2005, the NRC was informed by Entergy that cracks in a Unit 2 spent
Background:  
      fuel pool wall had been discovered during excavation work inside the spent fuel pool
On September 1, 2005, the NRC was informed by Entergy that cracks in a Unit 2 spent  
      building. Low levels of radioactive contamination were found in the vicinity. Entergy's
fuel pool wall had been discovered during excavation work inside the spent fuel pool  
      initial investigation of the issue revealed that groundwater in the vicinity was
building. Low levels of radioactive contamination were found in the vicinity. Entergy's  
      contaminated with tritium. On September 20, 2005, Region I initiated a special inspection
initial investigation of the issue revealed that groundwater in the vicinity was  
      of this matter to examine the licensee's performance and determine if the contaminated
contaminated with tritium. On September 20, 2005, Region I initiated a special inspection  
      groundwater affected, or could affect, public health and safety. Subsequently, Entergy
of this matter to examine the licensee's performance and determine if the contaminated  
      initiated actions to perform a comprehensive groundwater site characterization, identify
groundwater affected, or could affect, public health and safety. Subsequently, Entergy  
      the sources, and effect mitigation and remediation of the condition.
initiated actions to perform a comprehensive groundwater site characterization, identify  
      The NRC special inspection report, issued in March 2006, assessed Entergy's
the sources, and effect mitigation and remediation of the condition.  
      performance, achievements, and plans for more extensive site characterization, and
The NRC special inspection report, issued in March 2006, assessed Entergy's  
      reported that the groundwater contamination did not, nor was likely to, adversely affect
performance, achievements, and plans for more extensive site characterization, and  
      public health and safety. In the report, and subsequent public meetings, NRC indicated
reported that the groundwater contamination did not, nor was likely to, adversely affect  
      that a final conclusion would be reached after Entergy completed its groundwater
public health and safety. In the report, and subsequent public meetings, NRC indicated  
      characterization initiative.
that a final conclusion would be reached after Entergy completed its groundwater  
      The NRC Region I continued inspection and monitoring of Entergy's activities in
characterization initiative.  
      accordance with successive approved deviation to the normal Reactor Oversight
The NRC Region I continued inspection and monitoring of Entergy's activities in  
      Process for calendar years 2006 (ML053010404), 2007 (ML063480016), 2008
accordance with successive approved deviation to the normal Reactor Oversight  
      (ML073480290) and 2009 (ML083590057). During this period, the NRC staff closely
Process for calendar years 2006 (ML053010404), 2007 (ML063480016), 2008  
      monitored Entergy's groundwater characterization efforts, performed independent
(ML073480290) and 2009 (ML083590057). During this period, the NRC staff closely  
      inspections and testing, and independently evaluated radiological and hydrological
monitored Entergy's groundwater characterization efforts, performed independent  
      conditions affecting groundwater onsite. Additionally, the NRC independently verified
inspections and testing, and independently evaluated radiological and hydrological  
      groundwater releases by conducting split monitoring well sampling with Entergy and the
conditions affecting groundwater onsite. Additionally, the NRC independently verified  
      State of New York.
groundwater releases by conducting split monitoring well sampling with Entergy and the  
      On January 11, 2008, Entergy submitted the results of its comprehensive hydrogeologic
State of New York.  
      site characterization investigation (ML080320600), and included its plan for remediation
On January 11, 2008, Entergy submitted the results of its comprehensive hydrogeologic  
      and long-term monitoring of the on-site groundwater conditions. In its report, Entergy
site characterization investigation (ML080320600), and included its plan for remediation  
      described the source of groundwater contamination to be from the Unit 1 and Unit 2
and long-term monitoring of the on-site groundwater conditions. In its report, Entergy  
      spent fuel pools. The NRC documented its review of Entergy's report in inspection report
described the source of groundwater contamination to be from the Unit 1 and Unit 2  
      05000247 & 05000003/2007010 on May 13, 2008 (ML081340425). In a subsequent
spent fuel pools. The NRC documented its review of Entergy's report in inspection report  
      inspection 05000247/2008004 (ML08311 0566) dated November 6,2008, the NRC
05000247 & 05000003/2007010 on May 13, 2008 (ML081340425). In a subsequent  
                                                                                        Enclosure
inspection 05000247/2008004 (ML08311 0566) dated November 6,2008, the NRC  
Enclosure  


                                              5
5  
  confirmed that Entergy's conceptual site model of the site, which included both the
confirmed that Entergy's conceptual site model of the site, which included both the  
  vadose zone and saturated zone processes and conditions, effectively characterized the
vadose zone and saturated zone processes and conditions, effectively characterized the  
  onsite groundwater plume behavior and radionuclide transport. Evaluation of
onsite groundwater plume behavior and radionuclide transport. Evaluation of  
  radionuclide concentrations and pathway analyses indicated that the groundwater
radionuclide concentrations and pathway analyses indicated that the groundwater  
  contamination did not adversely affect public health and safety. Detailed discussions
contamination did not adversely affect public health and safety. Detailed discussions  
  and analyses indicated that the licensee's plans for long-term monitoring of the site,
and analyses indicated that the licensee's plans for long-term monitoring of the site,  
  relative to monitoring natural attenuation of residual groundwater contamination, were
relative to monitoring natural attenuation of residual groundwater contamination, were  
  reasonable.
reasonable.  
  On November 3, 2008, Entergy completed Unit 1 spent fuel pool system drainage and
On November 3, 2008, Entergy completed Unit 1 spent fuel pool system drainage and  
  sludge removal activities, essentially terminating the source from that facility. Given the
sludge removal activities, essentially terminating the source from that facility. Given the  
  change in conditions, Entergy initiated actions to establish a new groundwater
change in conditions, Entergy initiated actions to establish a new groundwater  
  contaminant baseline in support of its long-term monitoring program.
contaminant baseline in support of its long-term monitoring program.  
a. Inspection Scope
a.  
  The most recently approved Memorandum of Deviation, i.e., "Request for Renewal of
Inspection Scope  
  Deviation to the Action Matrix to Provide Heightened NRC Oversight of the Onsite
The most recently approved Memorandum of Deviation, i.e., "Request for Renewal of  
  Groundwater Monitoring at the Indian Point Energy Center," dated December 16, 2008
Deviation to the Action Matrix to Provide Heightened NRC Oversight of the Onsite  
  (ML083590057), identified the following objectives to be addressed in order to support
Groundwater Monitoring at the Indian Point Energy Center," dated December 16, 2008  
  resumption of normal inspection activities in accordance with the Reactor Oversight
(ML083590057), identified the following objectives to be addressed in order to support  
  Process:
resumption of normal inspection activities in accordance with the Reactor Oversight  
  *       Entergy has completed sufficient data collection and assessment to establish a
Process:  
          new groundwater contaminant baseline, now that the Unit 1 source term has
*  
          been terminated.
Entergy has completed sufficient data collection and assessment to establish a  
  *       Entergy has determined whether active leakage has been terminated or
new groundwater contaminant baseline, now that the Unit 1 source term has  
          continues to persist in regard to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool; and has implemented
been terminated.  
          appropriate monitoring and control measures, as necessary.
*  
  *       Entergy has established and implemented effluent control and environmental
Entergy has determined whether active leakage has been terminated or  
          monitoring procedures that provide reasonable assurance that the existing
continues to persist in regard to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool; and has implemented  
          groundwater conditions will continue to be effectively monitored and assessed,
appropriate monitoring and control measures, as necessary.  
          that the procedures will detect new or changed conditions in a timely manner, and
*  
          that the procedures are sufficient to monitor natural attenuation of the Unit 1 and
Entergy has established and implemented effluent control and environmental  
          Unit 2 groundwater contamination plumes.
monitoring procedures that provide reasonable assurance that the existing  
  The NRC team reviewed the licensee's performance and achievements relative to the
groundwater conditions will continue to be effectively monitored and assessed,  
  completion of these objectives.
that the procedures will detect new or changed conditions in a timely manner, and  
b. Findings and Observations
that the procedures are sufficient to monitor natural attenuation of the Unit 1 and  
  No findings of significance were identified.
Unit 2 groundwater contamination plumes.  
  The inspectors determined that Entergy completed the actions necessary to satisfy the
The NRC team reviewed the licensee's performance and achievements relative to the  
  objectives delineated in the approved Memorandum of Deviation, dated December 16,
completion of these objectives.  
  2008, (ML083590057). Notwithstanding, NRC will continue to monitor performance in
b.  
  this area, and re-assess the need for continued heightened inspection oversight as part
Findings and Observations  
  of the CY 2009 end-of-cycle performance review of IPEC.
No findings of significance were identified.  
                                                                                      Enclosure
The inspectors determined that Entergy completed the actions necessary to satisfy the  
objectives delineated in the approved Memorandum of Deviation, dated December 16,  
2008, (ML083590057). Notwithstanding, NRC will continue to monitor performance in  
this area, and re-assess the need for continued heightened inspection oversight as part  
of the CY 2009 end-of-cycle performance review of IPEC.  
Enclosure  


                                            6
6  
The following pertains:
The following pertains:  
*       Objective 1: Completion of sufficient data collection and assessment to establish
*  
        a new groundwater contaminant baseline, now that the Unit 1 source term has
Objective 1: Completion of sufficient data collection and assessment to establish  
        been terminated.
a new groundwater contaminant baseline, now that the Unit 1 source term has  
As a result of the defueling, drainage, and de-sludging of the Unit 1 spent fuel pool
been terminated.  
system in the Fall of 2008, the groundwater contamination source term from the Unit 1
As a result of the defueling, drainage, and de-sludging of the Unit 1 spent fuel pool  
facility was terminated. The inspectors confirmed that Entergy's subsequent data
system in the Fall of 2008, the groundwater contamination source term from the Unit 1  
collection and assessment activities, associated with the continual monitoring of the
facility was terminated. The inspectors confirmed that Entergy's subsequent data  
residual groundwater contamination, would be sufficient and effective to establish a new
collection and assessment activities, associated with the continual monitoring of the  
baseline relative to monitoring the residual groundwater condition and subsequent
residual groundwater contamination, would be sufficient and effective to establish a new  
assessment of dose consequence.
baseline relative to monitoring the residual groundwater condition and subsequent  
As expected, the first and second-quarter ground-water sample results in 2009, collected
assessment of dose consequence.  
from Monitoring Wells in the immediate vicinity of the Unit 1 spent fuel pool, indicated an
As expected, the first and second-quarter ground-water sample results in 2009, collected  
increase in Sr-90 groundwater concentrations . As determined from review of the
from Monitoring Wells in the immediate vicinity of the Unit 1 spent fuel pool, indicated an  
licensee's data and analysis, this increased concentration was the expected result of the
increase in Sr-90 groundwater concentrations. As determined from review of the  
volume of water that was necessary to fill the spent fuel pool system to effect defueling.
licensee's data and analysis, this increased concentration was the expected result of the  
Accordingly, Entergy's baseline data was predicated on the existing groundwater
volume of water that was necessary to fill the spent fuel pool system to effect defueling.  
conditions determined from its continuing analysis of collected monitoring data. Given
Accordingly, Entergy's baseline data was predicated on the existing groundwater  
that the original source of the contamination associated with leakage from the Unit 1.
conditions determined from its continuing analysis of collected monitoring data. Given  
spent fuel pool system has been terminated , the residual groundwater contamination
that the original source of the contamination associated with leakage from the Unit 1.  
involving Sr-90 is expected to naturally attenuate over time. The inspectors confirmed
spent fuel pool system has been terminated, the residual groundwater contamination  
that the current groundwater contaminant concentrations have not, nor are expected to,
involving Sr-90 is expected to naturally attenuate over time. The inspectors confirmed  
affect public health and safety; and the public radiological dose consequence is
that the current groundwater contaminant concentrations have not, nor are expected to,  
expected to continue to be a fraction of the NRC annual regulatory limit affecting liquid
affect public health and safety; and the public radiological dose consequence is  
effluents. The inspectors confirmed that continual monitoring of the migration and
expected to continue to be a fraction of the NRC annual regulatory limit affecting liquid  
attenuation of the Unit 1 associated groundwater contamination condition is being
effluents. The inspectors confirmed that continual monitoring of the migration and  
performed in accordance with Entergy's Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program
attenuation of the Unit 1 associated groundwater contamination condition is being  
(LTGWMP).
performed in accordance with Entergy's Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program  
The inspectors confirmed that Entergy has established , implemented and maintains a
(LTGWMP).  
long-term ground-water monitoring program that has sufficient in scope and
The inspectors confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented and maintains a  
implementation requirements to effectively monitor and assess this condition .
long-term ground-water monitoring program that has sufficient in scope and  
Accordingly, the intent of this objective was considered satisfied.
implementation requirements to effectively monitor and assess this condition.  
*       Objective 2: Determination whether active leakage has been terminated or
Accordingly, the intent of this objective was considered satisfied.  
        continues to persist in regard to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool, and that appropriate
*  
        monitoring and control measures have been implemented , as necessary.
Objective 2: Determination whether active leakage has been terminated or  
Entergy has been actively engaged in analyzing Monitoring Well data associated with the
continues to persist in regard to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool, and that appropriate  
H-3 (tritium) groundwater contamination condition that resulted from previously identified
monitoring and control measures have been implemented, as necessary.  
leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool: Entergy's analysis indicated an overall .
Entergy has been actively engaged in analyzing Monitoring Well data associated with the  
decreaSing trend in tritium concentration in the groundwater as a result of previous
H-3 (tritium) groundwater contamination condition that resulted from previously identified  
efforts to examine the condition of the spent fuel pool and transfer canal liner, and effect
leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool: Entergy's analysis indicated an overall .  
repair, as necessary. Notwithstanding , as previously reported , Entergy's examination of
decreaSing trend in tritium concentration in the groundwater as a result of previous  
the spent fuel pool liner was necessarily limited to only the accessible surfaces. That is,
efforts to examine the condition of the spent fuel pool and transfer canal liner, and effect  
only about 40 % of the total liner surfaces were accessible for examination; the
repair, as necessary. Notwithstanding, as previously reported, Entergy's examination of  
remaining surfaces were necessarily inaccessible due to the proximity of stored spent
the spent fuel pool liner was necessarily limited to only the accessible surfaces. That is,  
fuel that prevented examination.
only about 40 % of the total liner surfaces were accessible for examination; the  
                                                                                    Enclosure
remaining surfaces were necessarily inaccessible due to the proximity of stored spent  
fuel that prevented examination.  
Enclosure  


                                            7
7  
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's analysis derived from groundwater monitoring
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's analysis derived from groundwater monitoring  
data, and confirmed that there was no apparent indication of any significant large flux on-
data, and confirmed that there was no apparent indication of any significant large flux on-
going active leakage. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's monitoring well
going active leakage. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's monitoring well  
detection sensitivity data, which supports that active leakage, if occurring, would likely
detection sensitivity data, which supports that active leakage, if occurring, would likely  
not exceed 30 gallons per day (0.02 gpm). This sensitivity analysis was based on
not exceed 30 gallons per day (0.02 gpm). This sensitivity analysis was based on  
comparison of the tritium concentration that is available in the spent fuel pool and the
comparison of the tritium concentration that is available in the spent fuel pool and the  
actual tritium concentration derived from samples collected from relevant monitoring
actual tritium concentration derived from samples collected from relevant monitoring  
wells in the near vicinity of the spent fuel pool. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed
wells in the near vicinity of the spent fuel pool. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed  
licensee analysis and data from a long-term tracer test that indicated the potential for
licensee analysis and data from a long-term tracer test that indicated the potential for  
slow, episodic tritium migration in the fractures of the vadose zone that affect the mobility
slow, episodic tritium migration in the fractures of the vadose zone that affect the mobility  
of contaminated groundwater from the immediate vicinity of the Unit 2 spent fuel pool to
of contaminated groundwater from the immediate vicinity of the Unit 2 spent fuel pool to  
the water table. The licensee's analysis is supported by the fact that fluorescine dye,
the water table. The licensee's analysis is supported by the fact that fluorescine dye,  
which was injected as part of the groundwater characterization study over two years ago,
which was injected as part of the groundwater characterization study over two years ago,  
is still detectable in certain nearby monitoring wells.
is still detectable in certain nearby monitoring wells.  
The inspectors noted that there were occasional spikes and general variability in some
The inspectors noted that there were occasional spikes and general variability in some  
monitoring well tritium concentration values that were not characteristic of the expected
monitoring well tritium concentration values that were not characteristic of the expected  
attenuation that would normally be expected at this time . Additionally, the licensee
attenuation that would normally be expected at this time. Additionally, the licensee  
continued to occasionally collect a small quantity of water from the leak collection box
continued to occasionally collect a small quantity of water from the leak collection box  
that was installed on the Unit 2 spent fuel pool wall crack that was identified in 2005.
that was installed on the Unit 2 spent fuel pool wall crack that was identified in 2005.  
Accordingly, while there was no indication of any significant large flux active leakage,
Accordingly, while there was no indication of any significant large flux active leakage,  
there was insufficient basis to conclude that there is absolutely no persistent low flux
there was insufficient basis to conclude that there is absolutely no persistent low flux  
leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool, at this time.
leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool, at this time.  
Notwithstanding, the inspectors determined that the licensee's sensitivity analysis of
Notwithstanding, the inspectors determined that the licensee's sensitivity analysis of  
groundwater monitoring data, relative to its ability to detect active leakage in excess of
groundwater monitoring data, relative to its ability to detect active leakage in excess of  
about 30 gallons per day, was reasonably derived. Additionally, the inspectors
about 30 gallons per day, was reasonably derived. Additionally, the inspectors  
confirmed that the current groundwater conditions, even if there was persistent low flux
confirmed that the current groundwater conditions, even if there was persistent low flux  
leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool, has not, nor would be expected to, affect public
leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool, has not, nor would be expected to, affect public  
health and safety; and the public radiological dose consequence would be expected to
health and safety; and the public radiological dose consequence would be expected to  
continue to be a fraction of the NRC annual regulatory limit affecting liquid effluents. The
continue to be a fraction of the NRC annual regulatory limit affecting liquid effluents. The  
inspectors confirmed that continual monitoring of the migration and attenuation of the
inspectors confirmed that continual monitoring of the migration and attenuation of the  
Unit 2 associated groundwater contamination condition was being performed in
Unit 2 associated groundwater contamination condition was being performed in  
accordance with Entergy's Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program; and that the
accordance with Entergy's Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program; and that the  
program implemented appropriate monitoring and control measures for this condition.
program implemented appropriate monitoring and control measures for this condition.  
The inspectors confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented and maintained a
The inspectors confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented and maintained a  
long-term ground-water monitoring program that has sufficient scope and
long-term ground-water monitoring program that has sufficient scope and  
implementation requirements to effectively monitor and assess the present condition .
implementation requirements to effectively monitor and assess the present condition.  
Further, the licensee is considering monitOring in the vadose zone , in the vicinity of the
Further, the licensee is considering monitOring in the vadose zone, in the vicinity of the  
Unit 2 facility, to assist in the detection of large flux releases . Accordingly, the intent of
Unit 2 facility, to assist in the detection of large flux releases. Accordingly, the intent of  
this objective was considered satisfied.
this objective was considered satisfied.  
*         Objective 3: Establishment and implementation of effluent control and
*  
          environmental monitoring procedures that provide reasonable assurance that the
Objective 3: Establishment and implementation of effluent control and  
          existing groundwater conditions will continue to be effectively monitored and
environmental monitoring procedures that provide reasonable assurance that the  
          assessed, that the procedures will detect new or changed conditions in a timely
existing groundwater conditions will continue to be effectively monitored and  
          manner, and that the procedures are sufficient to monitor natural attenuation of
assessed, that the procedures will detect new or changed conditions in a timely  
          the Unit 1 and Unit2 groundwater contamination plumes.
manner, and that the procedures are sufficient to monitor natural attenuation of  
                                                                                      Enclosure
the Unit 1 and Unit2 groundwater contamination plumes.  
Enclosure  


                                                8
8  
    The NRC has conducted several inspections (August 2007, October 2008, and August
The NRC has conducted several inspections (August 2007, October 2008, and August  
    2009) of the licensee's Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program. The inspectors
2009) of the licensee's Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program. The inspectors  
    confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented and maintained a Long-Term
confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented and maintained a Long-Term  
    Ground-Water Monitoring Program that was sufficient in scope and implementation
Ground-Water Monitoring Program that was sufficient in scope and implementation  
    requirements to effectively monitor and assess the existing contaminated groundwater
requirements to effectively monitor and assess the existing contaminated groundwater  
    conditions affecting the Indian Point Energy Center.
conditions affecting the Indian Point Energy Center.  
    During this inspection, the inspectors examined the refurbishment of the LaFarge No.2
During this inspection, the inspectors examined the refurbishment of the LaFarge No.2  
    Monitoring Well (one of the principal off-site monitoring wells) and confirmed its
Monitoring Well (one of the principal off-site monitoring wells) and confirmed its  
    acceptability as a valid off-site monitoring location. Additionally, the inspectors verified
acceptability as a valid off-site monitoring location. Additionally, the inspectors verified  
    that the administrative controls, established in the Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring
that the administrative controls, established in the Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring  
    Program, were sufficient t9 provide assurance of review and appropriate communication
Program, were sufficient t9 provide assurance of review and appropriate communication  
    of activities and changes that affect ground-water monitoring conditions; and that the
of activities and changes that affect ground-water monitoring conditions; and that the  
    program included sufficient sampling requirements for storm drains and the Unit 1
program included sufficient sampling requirements for storm drains and the Unit 1  
    foundation drain systems.
foundation drain systems.  
    During this inspection, the inspectors reviewed a March 25, 2009 instance involving the
During this inspection, the inspectors reviewed a March 25, 2009 instance involving the  
    licensee's detection of tritiated water in the catch basin of a storm drain in the vicinity of
licensee's detection of tritiated water in the catch basin of a storm drain in the vicinity of  
    Unit 3, and in an adjacent shallow monitoring well. The licensee conducted an extensive
Unit 3, and in an adjacent shallow monitoring well. The licensee conducted an extensive  
    investigation but was unable to find an explanation for this one-time occurrence. The
investigation but was unable to find an explanation for this one-time occurrence. The  
    inspectors confirmed that the occurrence had no radiological consequence onsite or
inspectors confirmed that the occurrence had no radiological consequence onsite or  
    offsite; and no leakage was identified from any Unit 3 component containing tritiated
offsite; and no leakage was identified from any Unit 3 component containing tritiated  
    water. However, the nature of the occurrence indicated uncertainty in the ability of the
water. However, the nature of the occurrence indicated uncertainty in the ability of the  
    existing Unit 3 monitoring wells to detect potential leakage from that facility. While there
existing Unit 3 monitoring wells to detect potential leakage from that facility. While there  
    was no current on-going leakage affecting the groundwater at Unit 3, Entergy initiated
was no current on-going leakage affecting the groundwater at Unit 3, Entergy initiated  
    action to re-evaluate the Unit 3 groundwater monitoring configuration (both vertically and
action to re-evaluate the Unit 3 groundwater monitoring configuration (both vertically and  
    horizontally) to determine its effectiveness in meeting the objectives and
horizontally) to determine its effectiveness in meeting the objectives and  
    recommendations of the NEI "Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative- Final Guidance
recommendations of the NEI "Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative- Final Guidance  
    Document, August 2007" (ML072600292 and ML07261 0036); and amend the Long-
Document, August 2007" (ML072600292 and ML07261 0036); and amend the Long-
    Term Groundwater Monitoring Program, as necessary.
Term Groundwater Monitoring Program, as necessary.  
    Notwithstanding, the inspectors confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented
Notwithstanding, the inspectors confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented  
    and maintained a Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program that has sufficient
and maintained a Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program that has sufficient  
    scope and implementation requirements to effectively monitor and assess the existing *
scope and implementation requirements to effectively monitor and assess the existing *  
    groundwater conditions affecting Indian Point Energy Center. Accordingly, the intent of
groundwater conditions affecting Indian Point Energy Center. Accordingly, the intent of  
    this objective was considered satisfied .
this objective was considered satisfied .  
.2 Groundwater Sampling
. 2  
a. Inspection Scope
Groundwater Sampling  
    During the licensee's groundwater investigation, over 1200 groundwater samples were
a.  
    collected and analyzed from the established on-site monitoring well network by the
Inspection Scope  
    second quarter of 2009. The analytical results provide the basis for assessing the extent
During the licensee's groundwater investigation, over 1200 groundwater samples were  
    of the groundwater plume and for performing calculations of offsite doses to members of
collected and analyzed from the established on-site monitoring well network by the  
    the public. In order to assess Entergy's performance in this area, the NRC implemented
second quarter of 2009. The analytical results provide the basis for assessing the extent  
    an independent split sample collection program with the licensee beginning in
of the groundwater plume and for performing calculations of offsite doses to members of  
    September 2005. The monitoring wells selected for independent verification included
the public. In order to assess Entergy's performance in this area, the NRC implemented  
    the southem boundary wells and those wells bordering the Hudson River that were used
an independent split sample collection program with the licensee beginning in  
                                                                                        Enclosure
September 2005. The monitoring wells selected for independent verification included  
the southem boundary wells and those wells bordering the Hudson River that were used  
Enclosure  


                                                9
9  
      in support of effluent release and dose assessment calculations. Sample identity was
in support of effluent release and dose assessment calculations. Sample identity was  
      assured by chain-of-custody procedures that included sample collection observation by
assured by chain-of-custody procedures that included sample collection observation by  
      the NRC or a representative of the NYS DEC. The NRC samples were analyzed by an
the NRC or a representative of the NYS DEC. The NRC samples were analyzed by an  
      independent govemment laboratory to ensure validation of the licensee's groundwater
independent govemment laboratory to ensure validation of the licensee's groundwater  
      contamination results and off-site environmental sample radioactive measurements.
contamination results and off-site environmental sample radioactive measurements.  
      By the second quarter of 2009, over 300 split groundwater samples were obtained to
By the second quarter of 2009, over 300 split groundwater samples were obtained to  
      provide an independent check of Entergy's analytical results and to independently verify
provide an independent check of Entergy's analytical results and to independently verify  
      if there was any detectable migration of groundwater contaminants offsite. These split
if there was any detectable migration of groundwater contaminants offsite. These split  
      samples represent over 1,200 analyses, primarily for hydrogen-3 (tritium), strontium-90,
samples represent over 1,200 analyses, primarily for hydrogen-3 (tritium), strontium-90,  
      nickel-63, and gamma-emitting radionuclides that characterized the effluent releases.
nickel-63, and gamma-emitting radionuclides that characterized the effluent releases.  
      Analyses for other radionuclides were performed, but none were detected.
Analyses for other radionuclides were performed, but none were detected.  
  b. Findings and Assessment
b.  
      No findings of significance were identified.
Findings and Assessment  
      In general, Entergy's groundwater measurements of radioactivity were of good quality
No findings of significance were identified.  
      and of sufficient sensitivity to assess radiological impact. The quality of Entergy's
In general, Entergy's groundwater measurements of radioactivity were of good quality  
      measurements were confirmed by various split samples analyzed by the NRC. Of the
and of sufficient sensitivity to assess radiological impact. The quality of Entergy's  
      over 1200 results that were reviewed, there were only a few sample disagreements
measurements were confirmed by various split samples analyzed by the NRC. Of the  
      based on the statistical comparison criteria specified in NRC Inspection Procedure
over 1200 results that were reviewed, there were only a few sample disagreements  
      84750, "Radioactive Waste Treatment, and Effluent and Environmental Monitoring." As
based on the statistical comparison criteria specified in NRC Inspection Procedure  
      a result of these few discrepancies, Entergy took corrective action to establish,
84750, "Radioactive Waste Treatment, and Effluent and Environmental Monitoring." As  
      implement, and maintain procedures to effect improved quality control and assurance of
a result of these few discrepancies, Entergy took corrective action to establish,  
      sample analysis performed by its own laboratory and contract analytical laboratories.
implement, and maintain procedures to effect improved quality control and assurance of  
    During the past 3)1" years, the on-site groundwater transport pathway has been
sample analysis performed by its own laboratory and contract analytical laboratories.  
    effectively characterized by the licensee, and a significant quantity of on-site groundwater
During the past 3)1" years, the on-site groundwater transport pathway has been  
    monitoring data has been collected and analyzed by Entergy. A representative numbers
effectively characterized by the licensee, and a significant quantity of on-site groundwater  
    of split samples have confirmed the overall efficacy of the licensee's analytical capability.
monitoring data has been collected and analyzed by Entergy. A representative numbers  
    As the site characterization was tested through pumping and tracer testing, the
of split samples have confirmed the overall efficacy of the licensee's analytical capability.  
    contaminant plume uncertainty has been significantly reduced . Given this
As the site characterization was tested through pumping and tracer testing, the  
    accomplishment, and the NRC determination that Entergy has demonstrated an effective
contaminant plume uncertainty has been significantly reduced. Given this  
    groundwater sample quality control program, the NRC will discontinue any further split
accomplishment, and the NRC determination that Entergy has demonstrated an effective  
    sampling activities.
groundwater sample quality control program, the NRC will discontinue any further split  
40A6 Meetings, including Exit
sampling activities.  
.1   Exit Meeting Summary
40A6 Meetings, including Exit  
    The inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. D. Mayer and other licensee and
.1  
    New York State representatives on August 19, 2009 and September 4, 2009. The
Exit Meeting Summary  
    licensee acknowledged the findings presented. Based upon discussions with the
The inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. D. Mayer and other licensee and  
    licensee, none of the information presented at the exit meeting and included in this report
New York State representatives on August 19, 2009 and September 4, 2009. The  
    was considered proprietary.
licensee acknowledged the findings presented. Based upon discussions with the  
                                                                                        Enclosure
licensee, none of the information presented at the exit meeting and included in this report  
was considered proprietary.  
Enclosure  


                                              A-1
Licensee Personnel
                                        ATTACHMENT
J. Pollock
                                SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
M. BaNenik
                                  KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
P. Conroy
Licensee Personnel
D. Croulet
J. Pollock            Site Vice President
P. Donahue
M. BaNenik            Principal Engineer, GZA Geo EnVironmental, Inc.
C. English
P. Conroy            Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance
G. Hinrichs
D. Croulet            Licensing Engineer
D. Loope
P. Donahue            Chemistry Specialist
T. Jones
C. English            Unit 1 Project Engineer
R. LaVera
G. Hinrichs          Project Engineer
D. Mayer
D. Loope              Radiation Protection Superintendent
J. Michetti
T. Jones              Licensing Engineer
J. Peters
R. LaVera            Radiological Engineer
D. Rusczyk
D. Mayer              Director, Special Projects
S. Sandike
J. Michetti          RMS System Engineer
J. Simpson
J. Peters            Plant Chemist
R. Walpole
D. Rusczyk            Environmental Assessment, GZA
A-1  
S. Sandike            Chemistry ODCM Specialist
ATTACHMENT  
J. Simpson            Environmental Assessment, GZA
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION  
R. Walpole            Manager, Licensing
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT  
New York State Inspection ObseNers
Site Vice President  
L. Rosenmann         Engineering Geologist, New York State, Department of Environmental
Principal Engineer, GZA Geo EnVironmental, Inc.  
                      ConseNations
Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance  
                              INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED
Licensing Engineer  
71122.01       Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems
Chemistry Specialist  
                              LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Unit 1 Project Engineer  
        Annual Radiological Effluent Release Reports - 2007 and 2008
Project Engineer  
        Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 2
Radiation Protection Superintendent  
        O-CY-2730, Rev. 1, Airbome Radioactive Effluents
Licensing Engineer  
        O-CY-2740, Rev. 1, Liquid Radioactive Effluents
Radiological Engineer  
        IP-SMM-CY-001, Rev. 7, Radioactive Effluents Control Program
Director, Special Projects  
        IP-SMM-CY-110, Rev. 3, Radiological Groundwater Monitoring Program
RMS System Engineer  
        2-CY-2625, Rev. 14, General Plant Systems Specifications and Frequencies
Plant Chemist  
        3-CY-2325, Rev. 8, Radioactive Sampling Schedule
Environmental Assessment, GZA  
        2-S0P-5.2.4, Rev. 33, Calculation and Recording of Radioactive Gaseous Releases
Chemistry ODCM Specialist  
        2-S0P-5.1.5, Rev. 34, Calculation and Recording of Radioactive Liquid Releases
Environmental Assessment, GZA  
        3-S0P-WDS-014, Rev. 25, Liquid Waste Releases
Manager, Licensing  
                                                                                  Attachment
New York State Inspection ObseNers  
L. Rosenmann  
Engineering Geologist, New York State, Department of Environmental  
ConseNations  
INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED  
71122.01  
Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems  
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED  
Annual Radiological Effluent Release Reports - 2007 and 2008  
Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 2  
O-CY-2730, Rev. 1, Airbome Radioactive Effluents  
O-CY-2740, Rev. 1, Liquid Radioactive Effluents  
IP-SMM-CY-001, Rev. 7, Radioactive Effluents Control Program  
IP-SMM-CY-110, Rev. 3, Radiological Groundwater Monitoring Program  
2-CY-2625, Rev. 14, General Plant Systems Specifications and Frequencies  
3-CY-2325, Rev. 8, Radioactive Sampling Schedule  
2-S0P-5.2.4, Rev. 33, Calculation and Recording of Radioactive Gaseous Releases  
2-S0P-5.1.5, Rev. 34, Calculation and Recording of Radioactive Liquid Releases  
3-S0P-WDS-014, Rev. 25, Liquid Waste Releases  
Attachment  


                                              A-2
A-2  
      3-S0P-WDS-013, Rev. 25, Gaseous Waste Releases
3-S0P-WDS-013, Rev. 25, Gaseous Waste Releases  
      EN-RP-113, Response to Contaminated Spills/Leaks
EN-RP-113, Response to Contaminated Spills/Leaks  
      EN-CY-109, Sampling and Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Wells
EN-CY-109, Sampling and Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Wells  
      EN-CY-108, Monitoring of Non-Radioactive Systems
EN-CY-108, Monitoring of Non-Radioactive Systems  
      "Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative
"Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative  
      - Final Guidance Document, August 2007" (ML072600292 and ML072610036)
- Final Guidance Document, August 2007" (ML072600292 and ML072610036)  
      Unit 2 Liquid Release Permit No. 090016
Unit 2 Liquid Release Permit No. 090016  
      Unit 2 Gaseous Release Permit No. 090126
Unit 2 Gaseous Release Permit No. 090126  
      Unit 3 Liquid Release Permit No. 090081
Unit 3 Liquid Release Permit No. 090081  
      Unit 3 Gaseous Release Permit No. 090067
Unit 3 Gaseous Release Permit No. 090067  
Condition Reports:
Condition Reports:  
CR-IP3-2007 -0803           CR-IP2-2009-1334          CR-IP2-2009-1295
CR-IP3-2007 -0803  
CR-IP2-2009-2089            CR-IP2-2009-2352          CR-IP2-2009-2090
CR-IP2-2009-2089
CR-IP3-2009-3356            CR-IP3-2009-3201          CR-IP2-2009-2603
CR-IP3-2009-3356
CR-IP2-2009-2528            CR-IP3-2009-3254          CR-IP3-2009-320S
CR-IP2-2009-2528
CR-IP2-2009-3307            CR-IP2-2009-3306          CR-IP3-2007 -3953
CR-IP2-2009-3307
CR-IP3-2007-3954            CR-IP3-2007-3925          CR-IP3-2007 -41S3
CR-IP3-2007-3954
CR-IP2-200S-0270            CR-IP2-2007-5226          CR-IP2-2007-5217
CR-IP2-200S-0270
CR-IP2-200S-0375            CR-IP2-200S-0549          CR-IP2-2008-1149
CR-IP2-200S-0375
CR-IP3-200S-071S            CR-IP2-200S-0960          CR-IP2-2008-0404
CR-IP3-200S-071S
CR-IP2-200S-0377            CR-IP2-200S-0144          CR-IP2-2008-0492
CR-IP2-200S-0377
CR-IP2-2009-2266            CR-IP3-200S-0569          CR-IP3-2008-0S46
CR-IP2-2009-2266
CR-IP2-200S-1236            CR-IP3-200S-0852          CR-IP2-2008-0179
CR-IP2-200S-1236
CR-IP3-2007 -3860            CR-IP3-2008-0942         CR-IP2-2008-3154
CR-IP3-2007 -3860
CR-IP3-200S-1112            CR-IP2-2008-2468          CR-IP3-2008-0194
CR-IP3-200S-1112
CR* IP3*200S*2915            CR-IP3-2008-1215          CR-IP2-2008-3526
CR* IP3*200S*2915
CR*IP3*200S*1042            CR-IP2-2008-2581          CR-IP2-2008-2691
CR*IP3*200S*1042
CR* IP2*200S*2767            CR-IP3-2008-1218          CR-IP3-2009-00S0
CR*IP2*200S*2767
CR*IP2*200S* 4136            CR-IP3-2008-200 1        CR-IP2-2008-2955
CR*IP2*200S*4136
CR* IP3*200S*2184            CR-IP2-2008-3342          CR-IP2-2008-3492
CR*IP3*200S*2184
CR*IP2*200S*3662            CR-IP3-200S-1S99          CR-IP3-2008-1979
CR*IP2*200S*3662
CR*IP3* 200S*2125            CR-IP2-200S-4193          CR-IP2-2008-4108
CR*IP3*200S*2125
CR*IP2 c200S*4130            CR-IP2-200S-4254          CR-IP2-2008-4202
CR*IP2c200S*4130
CR*IP2*200S*4529            CR-IP2-200S-4337          CR-IP3-2008-2296
CR*IP2*200S*4529
CR*IP2-200S-4191            CR-IP3-200S-2279          CR-IP3-2008-2294
CR*IP2-200S-4191
CR-IP2-200S-456S            CR-IP3-2008-0624          CR-IP3-2007-0005
CR-IP2-200S-456S
CR-IP3-2007-0151            CR-IP3-2007-3367          CR-I P3-2007-27 48
CR-IP3-2007-0151
CR-IP3-2007 -2S99            CR-IP3-2007-3061          CR-IP3-2007-2S70
CR-IP3-2007 -2S99
CR-IP3-2007 -2134            CR-IP3-2007 -3075        CR-IP2-2008-1132
CR-IP3-2007 -2134
CR-IP3-2007-3129            CR-IP2-2008-4S48          CR-IP3-200S-2S62
CR-IP3-2007 -3129
CR-IP2-2008-4981            CR-IP2-200S-5055          CR-IP2-2009-0477
CR-IP2-2008-4981
CR-IP2-2008-5552            CR-IP3-2009-003S          CR-IP2-2009-01S4
CR-IP2-2008-5552
CR-IP2-2009-0609            CR-IP2-2009-1125          CR-IP3-2009-0494
CR-IP2-2009-0609
CR-IP2-2009-0565            CR-IP2-2009-079S          CR-IP3-2009-0591
CR-IP2-2009-0565
CR-IP2-2009-223S
CR-IP2-2009-223S
                                                                          Attachment
CR-IP2-2009-1334
CR-IP2-2009-2352
CR-IP3-2009-3201
CR-IP3-2009-3254
CR-IP2-2009-3306
CR-IP3-2007-3925
CR-IP2-2007-5226
CR-IP2-200S-0549
CR-IP2-200S-0960
CR-IP2-200S-0144
CR-IP3-200S-0569
CR-IP3-200S-0852
CR-IP3-2008-0942  
CR-IP2-2008-2468
CR-IP3-2008-1215
CR-IP2-2008-2581
CR-IP3-2008-1218
CR-IP3-2008-200 1
CR-IP2-2008-3342
CR-IP3-200S-1S99
CR-IP2-200S-4193
CR-IP2-200S-4254
CR-IP2-200S-4337
CR-IP3-200S-2279
CR-IP3-2008-0624
CR-IP3-2007-3367
CR-IP3-2007-3061
CR-IP3-2007 -3075
CR-IP2-2008-4S48
CR-IP2-200S-5055
CR-IP3-2009-003S
CR-IP2-2009-1125
CR-IP2-2009-079S
CR-IP2-2009-1295
CR-IP2-2009-2090
CR-IP2-2009-2603
CR-IP3-2009-320S
CR-IP3-2007 -3953
CR-IP3-2007 -41S3
CR-IP2-2007-5217
CR-IP2-2008-1149
CR-IP2-2008-0404
CR-IP2-2008-0492
CR-IP3-2008-0S46
CR-IP2-2008-0179
CR-IP2-2008-3154
CR-IP3-2008-0194
CR-IP2-2008-3526
CR-IP2-2008-2691
CR-IP3-2009-00S0
CR-IP2-2008-2955
CR-IP2-2008-3492
CR-IP3-2008-1979
CR-IP2-2008-4108
CR-IP2-2008-4202
CR-IP3-2008-2296
CR-IP3-2008-2294
CR-IP3-2007-0005
CR-I P3-2007 -27 48
CR-IP3-2007-2S70
CR-IP2-2008-1132
CR-IP3-200S-2S62
CR-IP2-2009-0477
CR-IP2-2009-01S4
CR-IP3-2009-0494
CR-IP3-2009-0591
Attachment  


                                          A-3
A-3  
NRC Groundwater Sample Result Documentation ICY 2009. 1st Quarter)
NRC Groundwater Sample Result Documentation ICY 2009. 1st Quarter)  
ML090400502. ML090920949. ML090920932
ML090400502. ML090920949. ML090920932  
                              LIST OF ACRONYMS USED
FSAR
FSAR        Final Safety Analysis Report
GPM
GPM        gallons per minute
LTGWMP
LTGWMP      Long Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program
NYS DEC
NYS DEC    State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation
ODCM
ODCM        Offsite Dose Calculation Manual
pCi/L
pCi/L      pico-Curies per Liter
PI&R
PI&R        Problem Identification and Resolution
Rap
Rap        Reactor Oversight Process
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED  
                                                                      Attachment
Final Safety Analysis Report  
gallons per minute  
Long Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program  
State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation  
Offsite Dose Calculation Manual  
pico-Curies per Liter  
Problem Identification and Resolution  
Reactor Oversight Process  
Attachment
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:04, 12 January 2025

Entergy Prefiled Hearing Exhibit ENT000343 - Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 1, 2 & 3 - NRC Inspection Reports Nos. 05000003/2009008; 05000247/2009008 and 05000286/2009008
ML12089A605
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/19/2009
From: Darrell Roberts
Division of Reactor Safety I
To: Joseph E Pollock
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
Shared Package
ML12089A599 List:
References
RAS 22132, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR IR-09-008
Download: ML12089A605 (17)


See also: IR 05000003/2009008

Text

ENT000343

Submitted: March 29, 2012

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Mr. Joseph Pollock

Site Vice President

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center

450 Broadway, GSB

P.O. Box 249

Buchanan, NY 10511-0249

475 ALLENDALE ROAD

KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1415

October 19, 2009

SUBJECT:

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 1, 2 & 3 - NRC INSPECTION

REPORT NOS. 05000003/2009008; 05000247/2009008; AND

05000286/2009008

Dear Mr. Pollock:

On September 4, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an

inspection at Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 1, 2, & 3. The enclosed report documents

the inspection results, which were discussed on August 19 and September 4, 2009, with Mr. Don

Mayer and other members of your staff.

The purpose of this inspection was to assess the establishment, implementation, and

maintenance of your Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Program; review the circumstances

surrounding a previously identified occurrence involving the detection of tritated water in a Unit 3

storm drain system; review the performance of the site's Radiation Monitoring System; and

inspect and assess your performance relative to radiological effluents monitoring and control.

The inspection involved an examination of activities conducted under Entergy's license as

related to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the

conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selected

examination of procedures and representative records, observations of activities, interviews with

personnel, and independent assessment activities.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. Further, the

inspectors determined that Entergy's Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Program for the .lndian

Point Energy Center was effectively implemented and maintained in a manner that provided

continued radiological monitoring of the groundwater conditions to confirm conformance with

NRC regulatory requirements relative to the maintenance of public health and safety, and

protection of the environment.

Since 2005, as approved by NRC's Executive Director of Operations, Region I conducted

frequent and focused reviews of your groundwater investigation activities and long-term

monitoring program that exceeded the scope of NRC's normal baseline inspection program. As

a result, we have developed confidence in your commitment and ability to continue effective

monitoring and assessment of the on-site conditions to assure the maintenance of

J. Pollock

2

public health and safety, protection of the environment, and conformance with NRC regulatory

requirements. Our inspectors confirmed that the objectives specified in our deviation

memorandum dated December 16,2008 (ML083590057) have been satisfied. However, we will

continue to monitor your performance in this area, and will re-assess the need for continued

heightened inspection oversight during our end-of-cycle review of your CY 2009 perfonmance.

In accordance with 10 CFR2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room

or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

J);W~

Darrell J. Roberts, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos: 50-003, 50-247, 50-286

License Nos: DPR-5, DPR-26, DPR-64

Enclosure:

Inspection Report Nos. 05000003/2009008, 05000247/2009008,

05000286/2009008

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

cc w/encj: Distribution via ListServ

J. Pollock

2

public health and safety, protection of the environment, and conformance with NRC regulatory

requirements. Our inspectors confirmed that the objectives specified in our deviation

memorandum dated December 16, 2008 (ML083590057) have been satisfied. However, we will

continue to monitor your performance in this area, and will re-assess the need for continued

heightened inspection oversight during our end-of-cycle review of your CY 2009 performance.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in. the NRC Public Document Room

or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at hllp:llwww.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

IRA by Peter R. Wilson forI

Darrell J. Roberts, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos: 50-003, 50-247, 50-286

License Nos: DPR-5, DPR-26, DPR-64

Enclosure:

Inspection Report Nos. 05000003/2009008, 05000247/2009008,

05000286/2009008

w/Allachment: Supplemental Information

cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ

Distribution w/encl: (via E-mail)

S. Collins, RA (R10RAMAIL RESOURCE)

M. Dapas, DRA (R10RAMAIL

RESOURCE)

D. Lew, DRP (R1 DRPMAIL RESOURCE)

J. Clifford, DRP (R1DRPMAIL

RESOURCE)

L. Trocine, Ri OEDO

RIDSNRRPMINDIANPOINTRESOURCE

B. Welling, DRP

B. Bickell, DRP

S. McCarver, DRP

G. Malone, DRP, Senior Resident Inspector

- Indian Point 2

D. Hochmuth, DRP

D. Bearde, DRP

Region I Docket Room (w/concurrences)

ROPreport Resource

D. Roberts, DRS

P. Wilson, DRS

J. White, DRS

SUNSI Review Complete:

JRW

(Reviewer's Inrtials)

OOCUMENT NAME: G:IORSIPlant Support Branch 2INoggleIIP2009008Rev1 .doc

After declaring this document ~An Official Agency Record w it will be released to the Public.

To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "e" = COpy without attachment/enclosure "E" = COpy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No CQP"y

OFFICE

RIIDRS

I

RES

I

RIIDRS

I

RIIDRP

I

RIIDRS

I

NAME

JNoggle/JDN

TNicholsonltjn

JWhite/jrw' ehg

BWeliinglBW

DRoberts/prw for

(telecon)

for'

DATE

10/06/09

10/14/09

10/19/09

10/16/09

10/16/09

  • see pnor concurrence

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Docket Nos.

License Nos.

Report Nos.

Licensee:

Facility:

Location:

Dates: .

Inspectors:

Approved by:

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I 50-003, 50-247, 50-286

DPR-3, DPR-26, DPR-64

05000003/2009008, 05000247/2009008, and 05000286/2009008

Entergy Nuclear Northeast

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, & 3

295 Broadway

Buchanan, NY 10511-0308

Augusr18, 2009 - September 4, 2009

J. Noggle, Sr. Health Physicist, CHP, team leader

T. Nicholson, Sr. Technical Advisor for Radionuclide Transport

J. Williams, U.S. Geological Survey, Troy, New York

John R. White, Chief

Plant Support Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000003/2009008, IR 05000247/2009008, IR 05000286/2009008; 08/18/2009 - 9/04/2009;

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2 & 3; Other Activities - associated with ROP

deviation memorandum, one PI&R sample, and radioactive effluents baseline inspection.

No findings of significance were identified. The report covers the period from August 18 through

September 4, 2009, and discusses inspection activities conducted by a region-based inspector,

and an inspection team comprised of representatives of Region I, NRC's Office of Research,

and the U. S. Geological Survey. The inspection provided bases for the NRC to determine that

Entergy had completed actions necessary to satisfy the objectives delineated in our deviation

memorandum, "Request for Renewal of Deviation to the Action Matrix to Provide Heightened

NRC Oversight of the Onsite Groundwater Monitoring at the Indian Point Energy Center,"

(ML083590057), dated December 16,2008. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe

operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor

Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.

ii

Enclosure

Report Details

2.

RADIATION SAFETY

Cornerstone: Public Radiation Safety (PS)

2PS1 Gaseous and Liguid Effluents (71122.01 - 3 samples)

a.

Inspection Scope

1) The inspector reviewed the following documents to evaluate the effectiveness of the

licensee's radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent control programs relative to the

applicable regulatory requirements specified in the Technical Specifications and the

Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (TS/ODCM).

The 2007 and 2008 Radiological Annual Effluent Release Reports were

reviewed including independently assessing selected public dose calculations.

There were no anomalous results reported in these two reports. The report

included discussion of current groundwater conditions and the result of required

monitoring activities; and instances involving out-of-service radiation monitors or

effluent release flow rate monitors were listed in the reports and these were

evaluated during this inspection.

The current ODCM was reviewed, including technical justifications for any

changes made since the previous revision.

Applicable sections of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) were

reviewed to verify the adequacy of system descriptions for gaseous radioactive

waste and station ventilation systems.

The latest quality assurance audits of radioactive effluents and chemistry were

reviewed, including Entergy's program for identifying, controlling and assessing

potential contaminated spills and leakage.

There were no measurable effluent releases to the environment based on off-site

dose calculations, and there were no reported off-site environmental sample

measurements identifying plant-related radioactive materials during the 2007 and

2008 report period.

2) The inspector observed the following plant equipment and work activities to evaluate the

effectiveness of the licensee's radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent control programs.

Walkdowns were performed of accessible gaseous and liquid release system

components to review any recent changes or modifications; and to confirm the

alignment, operation and material condition of the radioactive liquid and

gaseous effluent radiation monitoring systems (RMS) at Units 1, 2 and 3.

Observations were conducted of radioactive effluent related sampling and

associated laboratory measurement techniques.

Procedural controls and selected radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent release

permits were reviewed to verify that radiation monitor alarm setpoint values and

releases were in agreement with Technical Specification and ODCM

requirements.

Enclosure

2

Chemistry logs, relative to out-of-service radiation monitoring conditions, were

reviewed to confirm the performance of compensatory sampling activities.

Surveillance tests of gaseous filtration discharge systems were reviewed to

confirm operability and ventilation flow rates with respect to the assumed flow

rates used in gaseous effluent release calculations.

Entergy's surveillance program of non-radioactive system interfaces with

radioactive process systems was reviewed to confirm effective monitoring and

control of potential effluent discharge paths to the environment.

Radiation monitoring system and chemistry laboratory counting instrument

calibration and quality control records were reviewed with respect to ODCM

surveillance requirements to confirm the licensee's ability identify and report

detectable radionuclides in radioactive measurement results.

3) Radioactive effluent control related corrective action program activities for 2007 through

August 2009 were reviewed, including the results of audits and the resolution of issues

identified through the condition report system. A comprehensive review was conducted

of conditions and occurrences involving out-of-service radiation monitoring system

components. Section 40A2 pertains.

b.

Findings and Observations

No findings of significance were identified. The following table summarizes the dose

consequence of radiological effluent release in the period between 2007 and 2008.

Table of Effluent Release calculated dose and public dose limits for 2007 and 2008

Dose in

Air Dose

%of

Air Dose

%of

liquid

'10 of

Liquid

%of

mrem/yr

Whole

limit

Max Organ

Limit

Dose

limit

Dose

limit

Body

WB

MaxO

2007

Units 1&2

2.43E-3

0.016

2.43E-3

0.016

5.35E-4

0.018

1.3E-3

0.013

2008

Units 1&2

2.07E-3

0.014

2.67E-3

0.018

6.11E-4

0.020

1.47E-3

0.Q15

2007

Unit 3

3.BBE-3

0.026

3.BBE-3

0.026

3.2E-4

0.007

2.14E-4

0.002

2008

Unit 3

1.99E-3

0.013

1.99E-3

0.013

1.56E-4

0.005

2.B3E-4

0.003

2007

Groundwater

2.66E-4

0.009

9.94E-4

0.01

2008

Groundwater

2.86E-4

0.009

9.35E-4

0.009

4.

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

40A2 Identification and Resolution of Problems

Cornerstone: Public Radiation Safety

.1

Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems

a.

Inspection Scope (71122.01)

The inspector reviewed approximately one hundred corrective action condition reports,

initiated between january 2007 and August 2009, that were associated with the gaseous,

liquid, and groundwater radioactive effluents program. The review was performed to

Enclosure

3

verify that problems identified by these condition reports were properly characterized in

the licensee's event reporting system, causes were identified, and actions implemented

commensurate the safety significance of the matters.

b.

Findings and Observations

No findings of significance were identified .

. 2

Radioactive Effluent Radiation Monitor System (RMS) Maintenance (71152 - 1 sample)

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors conducted a review corrective action program condition reports

associated with out-of-service radiation monitoring system equipment that was identified

in the period between January 2007 and August 2009. Licensee personnel having

cognizance of Radiation Monitoring System (RMS) performance and activities were

interviewed, including the RMS system engineer and senior chemistry staff. "Radiation

Monitoring System, Second Quarter 2009, Condition Report Trend Review for Radiation .

Monitoring System Improvement: dated September 2, 2009, was also reviewed.

b.

Findings and Observations

No findings of Significance were identified.

A large number of condition reports associated with the radiation monitoring system were

initiated during the past two years. Most of the condition reports were associated with

interruption of service of the RMS display consoles in both the Unit 2 and Unit 3 control

rooms. While these temporary display outages affected operators' ability to poll

individual detector readout displays, they did not interfere with control room annunciator

actuation or actual detector operability.

The cause of the Unit 3 display console issues was determined to be related to

excessive temperature in the RMS electronics cabinets that affected certain control room

RMS display console components. Short-term corrective actions included installing

permanent air conditioning to effect improved cooling of the RMS electronics cabinets.

The cause of Unit 2 RMS display console service interruptions continues to be under

review. Notwithstanding, Entergy is evaluating replacing the RMS display console

equipment in both control rooms to support station-wide computer network access

improvements.

Less frequently occurring RMS equipment issues remain to be resolved, including

occurrences involving the R-56 detectors, which monitor the discharge of waste sewage

from Units 2 and 3. The location of these detectors was determined to be susceptible to

failure due to flooding, power spiking, and power outages. In such conditions, waste

sewage is diverted to an on-site holding tank in order to conduct sampling prior to off-site

release. Accordingly, there is no safety significance to these RMS system failures. The

inspector confirmed that the licensee has implemented appropriate remedial actions for

these occurrences, and has initiated actions to improve the operating environment and

detector function to reduce the out-of-service time.

Enclosure

4

Entergy has identified the Unit 2 RMS as an upgrade project in its Top Ten Action Plan

for 2009. System engineering activities have been initiated for this improvement activity.

The inspector determined that the majority of identified problems with the Unit 2 and Unit

3 radiation monitoring systems were not associated with radiation detector operability or

effluent release control functions. For those instances that resulted in out-of-service

conditions, the licensee implemented appropriate compensatory measures as required

by regulatory requirements. The inspector confirmed that Entergy is engaged in RMS

. improvement activities, and has initiated appropriate corrective actions.

40A5 Other Activities

.1

Assessment of Licensee Performance Relative to Meeting the Objectives of the

December 16.2008 Memorandum Reguesting Deviation from the Action Matrix

Background:

On September 1, 2005, the NRC was informed by Entergy that cracks in a Unit 2 spent

fuel pool wall had been discovered during excavation work inside the spent fuel pool

building. Low levels of radioactive contamination were found in the vicinity. Entergy's

initial investigation of the issue revealed that groundwater in the vicinity was

contaminated with tritium. On September 20, 2005, Region I initiated a special inspection

of this matter to examine the licensee's performance and determine if the contaminated

groundwater affected, or could affect, public health and safety. Subsequently, Entergy

initiated actions to perform a comprehensive groundwater site characterization, identify

the sources, and effect mitigation and remediation of the condition.

The NRC special inspection report, issued in March 2006, assessed Entergy's

performance, achievements, and plans for more extensive site characterization, and

reported that the groundwater contamination did not, nor was likely to, adversely affect

public health and safety. In the report, and subsequent public meetings, NRC indicated

that a final conclusion would be reached after Entergy completed its groundwater

characterization initiative.

The NRC Region I continued inspection and monitoring of Entergy's activities in

accordance with successive approved deviation to the normal Reactor Oversight

Process for calendar years 2006 (ML053010404), 2007 (ML063480016), 2008

(ML073480290) and 2009 (ML083590057). During this period, the NRC staff closely

monitored Entergy's groundwater characterization efforts, performed independent

inspections and testing, and independently evaluated radiological and hydrological

conditions affecting groundwater onsite. Additionally, the NRC independently verified

groundwater releases by conducting split monitoring well sampling with Entergy and the

State of New York.

On January 11, 2008, Entergy submitted the results of its comprehensive hydrogeologic

site characterization investigation (ML080320600), and included its plan for remediation

and long-term monitoring of the on-site groundwater conditions. In its report, Entergy

described the source of groundwater contamination to be from the Unit 1 and Unit 2

spent fuel pools. The NRC documented its review of Entergy's report in inspection report

05000247 & 05000003/2007010 on May 13, 2008 (ML081340425). In a subsequent

inspection 05000247/2008004 (ML08311 0566) dated November 6,2008, the NRC

Enclosure

5

confirmed that Entergy's conceptual site model of the site, which included both the

vadose zone and saturated zone processes and conditions, effectively characterized the

onsite groundwater plume behavior and radionuclide transport. Evaluation of

radionuclide concentrations and pathway analyses indicated that the groundwater

contamination did not adversely affect public health and safety. Detailed discussions

and analyses indicated that the licensee's plans for long-term monitoring of the site,

relative to monitoring natural attenuation of residual groundwater contamination, were

reasonable.

On November 3, 2008, Entergy completed Unit 1 spent fuel pool system drainage and

sludge removal activities, essentially terminating the source from that facility. Given the

change in conditions, Entergy initiated actions to establish a new groundwater

contaminant baseline in support of its long-term monitoring program.

a.

Inspection Scope

The most recently approved Memorandum of Deviation, i.e., "Request for Renewal of

Deviation to the Action Matrix to Provide Heightened NRC Oversight of the Onsite

Groundwater Monitoring at the Indian Point Energy Center," dated December 16, 2008

(ML083590057), identified the following objectives to be addressed in order to support

resumption of normal inspection activities in accordance with the Reactor Oversight

Process:

Entergy has completed sufficient data collection and assessment to establish a

new groundwater contaminant baseline, now that the Unit 1 source term has

been terminated.

Entergy has determined whether active leakage has been terminated or

continues to persist in regard to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool; and has implemented

appropriate monitoring and control measures, as necessary.

Entergy has established and implemented effluent control and environmental

monitoring procedures that provide reasonable assurance that the existing

groundwater conditions will continue to be effectively monitored and assessed,

that the procedures will detect new or changed conditions in a timely manner, and

that the procedures are sufficient to monitor natural attenuation of the Unit 1 and

Unit 2 groundwater contamination plumes.

The NRC team reviewed the licensee's performance and achievements relative to the

completion of these objectives.

b.

Findings and Observations

No findings of significance were identified.

The inspectors determined that Entergy completed the actions necessary to satisfy the

objectives delineated in the approved Memorandum of Deviation, dated December 16,

2008, (ML083590057). Notwithstanding, NRC will continue to monitor performance in

this area, and re-assess the need for continued heightened inspection oversight as part

of the CY 2009 end-of-cycle performance review of IPEC.

Enclosure

6

The following pertains:

Objective 1: Completion of sufficient data collection and assessment to establish

a new groundwater contaminant baseline, now that the Unit 1 source term has

been terminated.

As a result of the defueling, drainage, and de-sludging of the Unit 1 spent fuel pool

system in the Fall of 2008, the groundwater contamination source term from the Unit 1

facility was terminated. The inspectors confirmed that Entergy's subsequent data

collection and assessment activities, associated with the continual monitoring of the

residual groundwater contamination, would be sufficient and effective to establish a new

baseline relative to monitoring the residual groundwater condition and subsequent

assessment of dose consequence.

As expected, the first and second-quarter ground-water sample results in 2009, collected

from Monitoring Wells in the immediate vicinity of the Unit 1 spent fuel pool, indicated an

increase in Sr-90 groundwater concentrations. As determined from review of the

licensee's data and analysis, this increased concentration was the expected result of the

volume of water that was necessary to fill the spent fuel pool system to effect defueling.

Accordingly, Entergy's baseline data was predicated on the existing groundwater

conditions determined from its continuing analysis of collected monitoring data. Given

that the original source of the contamination associated with leakage from the Unit 1.

spent fuel pool system has been terminated, the residual groundwater contamination

involving Sr-90 is expected to naturally attenuate over time. The inspectors confirmed

that the current groundwater contaminant concentrations have not, nor are expected to,

affect public health and safety; and the public radiological dose consequence is

expected to continue to be a fraction of the NRC annual regulatory limit affecting liquid

effluents. The inspectors confirmed that continual monitoring of the migration and

attenuation of the Unit 1 associated groundwater contamination condition is being

performed in accordance with Entergy's Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program

(LTGWMP).

The inspectors confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented and maintains a

long-term ground-water monitoring program that has sufficient in scope and

implementation requirements to effectively monitor and assess this condition.

Accordingly, the intent of this objective was considered satisfied.

Objective 2: Determination whether active leakage has been terminated or

continues to persist in regard to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool, and that appropriate

monitoring and control measures have been implemented, as necessary.

Entergy has been actively engaged in analyzing Monitoring Well data associated with the

H-3 (tritium) groundwater contamination condition that resulted from previously identified

leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool: Entergy's analysis indicated an overall .

decreaSing trend in tritium concentration in the groundwater as a result of previous

efforts to examine the condition of the spent fuel pool and transfer canal liner, and effect

repair, as necessary. Notwithstanding, as previously reported, Entergy's examination of

the spent fuel pool liner was necessarily limited to only the accessible surfaces. That is,

only about 40 % of the total liner surfaces were accessible for examination; the

remaining surfaces were necessarily inaccessible due to the proximity of stored spent

fuel that prevented examination.

Enclosure

7

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's analysis derived from groundwater monitoring

data, and confirmed that there was no apparent indication of any significant large flux on-

going active leakage. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's monitoring well

detection sensitivity data, which supports that active leakage, if occurring, would likely

not exceed 30 gallons per day (0.02 gpm). This sensitivity analysis was based on

comparison of the tritium concentration that is available in the spent fuel pool and the

actual tritium concentration derived from samples collected from relevant monitoring

wells in the near vicinity of the spent fuel pool. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed

licensee analysis and data from a long-term tracer test that indicated the potential for

slow, episodic tritium migration in the fractures of the vadose zone that affect the mobility

of contaminated groundwater from the immediate vicinity of the Unit 2 spent fuel pool to

the water table. The licensee's analysis is supported by the fact that fluorescine dye,

which was injected as part of the groundwater characterization study over two years ago,

is still detectable in certain nearby monitoring wells.

The inspectors noted that there were occasional spikes and general variability in some

monitoring well tritium concentration values that were not characteristic of the expected

attenuation that would normally be expected at this time. Additionally, the licensee

continued to occasionally collect a small quantity of water from the leak collection box

that was installed on the Unit 2 spent fuel pool wall crack that was identified in 2005.

Accordingly, while there was no indication of any significant large flux active leakage,

there was insufficient basis to conclude that there is absolutely no persistent low flux

leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool, at this time.

Notwithstanding, the inspectors determined that the licensee's sensitivity analysis of

groundwater monitoring data, relative to its ability to detect active leakage in excess of

about 30 gallons per day, was reasonably derived. Additionally, the inspectors

confirmed that the current groundwater conditions, even if there was persistent low flux

leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool, has not, nor would be expected to, affect public

health and safety; and the public radiological dose consequence would be expected to

continue to be a fraction of the NRC annual regulatory limit affecting liquid effluents. The

inspectors confirmed that continual monitoring of the migration and attenuation of the

Unit 2 associated groundwater contamination condition was being performed in

accordance with Entergy's Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program; and that the

program implemented appropriate monitoring and control measures for this condition.

The inspectors confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented and maintained a

long-term ground-water monitoring program that has sufficient scope and

implementation requirements to effectively monitor and assess the present condition.

Further, the licensee is considering monitOring in the vadose zone, in the vicinity of the

Unit 2 facility, to assist in the detection of large flux releases. Accordingly, the intent of

this objective was considered satisfied.

Objective 3: Establishment and implementation of effluent control and

environmental monitoring procedures that provide reasonable assurance that the

existing groundwater conditions will continue to be effectively monitored and

assessed, that the procedures will detect new or changed conditions in a timely

manner, and that the procedures are sufficient to monitor natural attenuation of

the Unit 1 and Unit2 groundwater contamination plumes.

Enclosure

8

The NRC has conducted several inspections (August 2007, October 2008, and August

2009) of the licensee's Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program. The inspectors

confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented and maintained a Long-Term

Ground-Water Monitoring Program that was sufficient in scope and implementation

requirements to effectively monitor and assess the existing contaminated groundwater

conditions affecting the Indian Point Energy Center.

During this inspection, the inspectors examined the refurbishment of the LaFarge No.2

Monitoring Well (one of the principal off-site monitoring wells) and confirmed its

acceptability as a valid off-site monitoring location. Additionally, the inspectors verified

that the administrative controls, established in the Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring

Program, were sufficient t9 provide assurance of review and appropriate communication

of activities and changes that affect ground-water monitoring conditions; and that the

program included sufficient sampling requirements for storm drains and the Unit 1

foundation drain systems.

During this inspection, the inspectors reviewed a March 25, 2009 instance involving the

licensee's detection of tritiated water in the catch basin of a storm drain in the vicinity of

Unit 3, and in an adjacent shallow monitoring well. The licensee conducted an extensive

investigation but was unable to find an explanation for this one-time occurrence. The

inspectors confirmed that the occurrence had no radiological consequence onsite or

offsite; and no leakage was identified from any Unit 3 component containing tritiated

water. However, the nature of the occurrence indicated uncertainty in the ability of the

existing Unit 3 monitoring wells to detect potential leakage from that facility. While there

was no current on-going leakage affecting the groundwater at Unit 3, Entergy initiated

action to re-evaluate the Unit 3 groundwater monitoring configuration (both vertically and

horizontally) to determine its effectiveness in meeting the objectives and

recommendations of the NEI "Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative- Final Guidance

Document, August 2007" (ML072600292 and ML07261 0036); and amend the Long-

Term Groundwater Monitoring Program, as necessary.

Notwithstanding, the inspectors confirmed that Entergy has established, implemented

and maintained a Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program that has sufficient

scope and implementation requirements to effectively monitor and assess the existing *

groundwater conditions affecting Indian Point Energy Center. Accordingly, the intent of

this objective was considered satisfied .

. 2

Groundwater Sampling

a.

Inspection Scope

During the licensee's groundwater investigation, over 1200 groundwater samples were

collected and analyzed from the established on-site monitoring well network by the

second quarter of 2009. The analytical results provide the basis for assessing the extent

of the groundwater plume and for performing calculations of offsite doses to members of

the public. In order to assess Entergy's performance in this area, the NRC implemented

an independent split sample collection program with the licensee beginning in

September 2005. The monitoring wells selected for independent verification included

the southem boundary wells and those wells bordering the Hudson River that were used

Enclosure

9

in support of effluent release and dose assessment calculations. Sample identity was

assured by chain-of-custody procedures that included sample collection observation by

the NRC or a representative of the NYS DEC. The NRC samples were analyzed by an

independent govemment laboratory to ensure validation of the licensee's groundwater

contamination results and off-site environmental sample radioactive measurements.

By the second quarter of 2009, over 300 split groundwater samples were obtained to

provide an independent check of Entergy's analytical results and to independently verify

if there was any detectable migration of groundwater contaminants offsite. These split

samples represent over 1,200 analyses, primarily for hydrogen-3 (tritium), strontium-90,

nickel-63, and gamma-emitting radionuclides that characterized the effluent releases.

Analyses for other radionuclides were performed, but none were detected.

b.

Findings and Assessment

No findings of significance were identified.

In general, Entergy's groundwater measurements of radioactivity were of good quality

and of sufficient sensitivity to assess radiological impact. The quality of Entergy's

measurements were confirmed by various split samples analyzed by the NRC. Of the

over 1200 results that were reviewed, there were only a few sample disagreements

based on the statistical comparison criteria specified in NRC Inspection Procedure

84750, "Radioactive Waste Treatment, and Effluent and Environmental Monitoring." As

a result of these few discrepancies, Entergy took corrective action to establish,

implement, and maintain procedures to effect improved quality control and assurance of

sample analysis performed by its own laboratory and contract analytical laboratories.

During the past 3)1" years, the on-site groundwater transport pathway has been

effectively characterized by the licensee, and a significant quantity of on-site groundwater

monitoring data has been collected and analyzed by Entergy. A representative numbers

of split samples have confirmed the overall efficacy of the licensee's analytical capability.

As the site characterization was tested through pumping and tracer testing, the

contaminant plume uncertainty has been significantly reduced. Given this

accomplishment, and the NRC determination that Entergy has demonstrated an effective

groundwater sample quality control program, the NRC will discontinue any further split

sampling activities.

40A6 Meetings, including Exit

.1

Exit Meeting Summary

The inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. D. Mayer and other licensee and

New York State representatives on August 19, 2009 and September 4, 2009. The

licensee acknowledged the findings presented. Based upon discussions with the

licensee, none of the information presented at the exit meeting and included in this report

was considered proprietary.

Enclosure

Licensee Personnel

J. Pollock

M. BaNenik

P. Conroy

D. Croulet

P. Donahue

C. English

G. Hinrichs

D. Loope

T. Jones

R. LaVera

D. Mayer

J. Michetti

J. Peters

D. Rusczyk

S. Sandike

J. Simpson

R. Walpole

A-1

ATTACHMENT

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Site Vice President

Principal Engineer, GZA Geo EnVironmental, Inc.

Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance

Licensing Engineer

Chemistry Specialist

Unit 1 Project Engineer

Project Engineer

Radiation Protection Superintendent

Licensing Engineer

Radiological Engineer

Director, Special Projects

RMS System Engineer

Plant Chemist

Environmental Assessment, GZA

Chemistry ODCM Specialist

Environmental Assessment, GZA

Manager, Licensing

New York State Inspection ObseNers

L. Rosenmann

Engineering Geologist, New York State, Department of Environmental

ConseNations

INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED

71122.01

Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Annual Radiological Effluent Release Reports - 2007 and 2008

Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 2

O-CY-2730, Rev. 1, Airbome Radioactive Effluents

O-CY-2740, Rev. 1, Liquid Radioactive Effluents

IP-SMM-CY-001, Rev. 7, Radioactive Effluents Control Program

IP-SMM-CY-110, Rev. 3, Radiological Groundwater Monitoring Program

2-CY-2625, Rev. 14, General Plant Systems Specifications and Frequencies

3-CY-2325, Rev. 8, Radioactive Sampling Schedule

2-S0P-5.2.4, Rev. 33, Calculation and Recording of Radioactive Gaseous Releases

2-S0P-5.1.5, Rev. 34, Calculation and Recording of Radioactive Liquid Releases

3-S0P-WDS-014, Rev. 25, Liquid Waste Releases

Attachment

A-2

3-S0P-WDS-013, Rev. 25, Gaseous Waste Releases

EN-RP-113, Response to Contaminated Spills/Leaks

EN-CY-109, Sampling and Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Wells

EN-CY-108, Monitoring of Non-Radioactive Systems

"Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative

- Final Guidance Document, August 2007" (ML072600292 and ML072610036)

Unit 2 Liquid Release Permit No. 090016

Unit 2 Gaseous Release Permit No. 090126

Unit 3 Liquid Release Permit No. 090081

Unit 3 Gaseous Release Permit No. 090067

Condition Reports:

CR-IP3-2007 -0803

CR-IP2-2009-2089

CR-IP3-2009-3356

CR-IP2-2009-2528

CR-IP2-2009-3307

CR-IP3-2007-3954

CR-IP2-200S-0270

CR-IP2-200S-0375

CR-IP3-200S-071S

CR-IP2-200S-0377

CR-IP2-2009-2266

CR-IP2-200S-1236

CR-IP3-2007 -3860

CR-IP3-200S-1112

CR* IP3*200S*2915

CR*IP3*200S*1042

CR*IP2*200S*2767

CR*IP2*200S*4136

CR*IP3*200S*2184

CR*IP2*200S*3662

CR*IP3*200S*2125

CR*IP2c200S*4130

CR*IP2*200S*4529

CR*IP2-200S-4191

CR-IP2-200S-456S

CR-IP3-2007-0151

CR-IP3-2007 -2S99

CR-IP3-2007 -2134

CR-IP3-2007 -3129

CR-IP2-2008-4981

CR-IP2-2008-5552

CR-IP2-2009-0609

CR-IP2-2009-0565

CR-IP2-2009-223S

CR-IP2-2009-1334

CR-IP2-2009-2352

CR-IP3-2009-3201

CR-IP3-2009-3254

CR-IP2-2009-3306

CR-IP3-2007-3925

CR-IP2-2007-5226

CR-IP2-200S-0549

CR-IP2-200S-0960

CR-IP2-200S-0144

CR-IP3-200S-0569

CR-IP3-200S-0852

CR-IP3-2008-0942

CR-IP2-2008-2468

CR-IP3-2008-1215

CR-IP2-2008-2581

CR-IP3-2008-1218

CR-IP3-2008-200 1

CR-IP2-2008-3342

CR-IP3-200S-1S99

CR-IP2-200S-4193

CR-IP2-200S-4254

CR-IP2-200S-4337

CR-IP3-200S-2279

CR-IP3-2008-0624

CR-IP3-2007-3367

CR-IP3-2007-3061

CR-IP3-2007 -3075

CR-IP2-2008-4S48

CR-IP2-200S-5055

CR-IP3-2009-003S

CR-IP2-2009-1125

CR-IP2-2009-079S

CR-IP2-2009-1295

CR-IP2-2009-2090

CR-IP2-2009-2603

CR-IP3-2009-320S

CR-IP3-2007 -3953

CR-IP3-2007 -41S3

CR-IP2-2007-5217

CR-IP2-2008-1149

CR-IP2-2008-0404

CR-IP2-2008-0492

CR-IP3-2008-0S46

CR-IP2-2008-0179

CR-IP2-2008-3154

CR-IP3-2008-0194

CR-IP2-2008-3526

CR-IP2-2008-2691

CR-IP3-2009-00S0

CR-IP2-2008-2955

CR-IP2-2008-3492

CR-IP3-2008-1979

CR-IP2-2008-4108

CR-IP2-2008-4202

CR-IP3-2008-2296

CR-IP3-2008-2294

CR-IP3-2007-0005

CR-I P3-2007 -27 48

CR-IP3-2007-2S70

CR-IP2-2008-1132

CR-IP3-200S-2S62

CR-IP2-2009-0477

CR-IP2-2009-01S4

CR-IP3-2009-0494

CR-IP3-2009-0591

Attachment

A-3

NRC Groundwater Sample Result Documentation ICY 2009. 1st Quarter)

ML090400502. ML090920949. ML090920932

FSAR

GPM

LTGWMP

NYS DEC

ODCM

pCi/L

PI&R

Rap

LIST OF ACRONYMS USED

Final Safety Analysis Report

gallons per minute

Long Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program

State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation

Offsite Dose Calculation Manual

pico-Curies per Liter

Problem Identification and Resolution

Reactor Oversight Process

Attachment