Regulatory Guide 1.17: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:w4-,-'U..ATOM~IC ;ENERGY CMISINAM'IDIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDSREGULATORY GUIDE 1.17IO0N.OF NUCLEARý POWER PLANTS AGAINST INDUST'RýIAL S/PROTEC1I1,SI*.-~ -AI44 If-A. I NTRODUCTION.bmuary 1 1973'. the 'Atomic Enilergyihad ýpublishied, i~n the eea ~ rrnendmnents to itsfregulation in :0 OClFR Part.nRsing of ýProdukction, and Utihzi~aion:ý.Prpsd§ 56.5,5c -would requ~ire' ea~chthrie to peate a nuiclear react'or to::.Pppopriate protection against industrdallt'roposed paragr~ph>(c), '-Thysical .Security..ý,50.34 would re'qwie each apphicaticin for,[g lic'iese: to include a~physical security pl~rn.paragrap~h (p) of § ý50.34-wul eýrepsees Who ic have not -subm .i .iIt .t e .dr a physi.c alin to submit such a plan to the Commissionig~6. 1 ..al within 60 dqys after the' pubic-aft n.. of'adments, in effeaiv'eý formi .,Furthermore,.quires ýthat an applicatio'n for a construiction:ide the.princia deign cieat estifethe. iequirements for Structures systems' ad.s esse-i~tial .to 'safety. This. regulatory guideihy~stcal security cnhena, thiat are,'gen~erallyfor the 'protection of uclear pdover.,plants'6f inidustrial sabotage, "which~ could; lead.to a.tihe -health and safiety of the. public Trhe:,oinnyImittee,&on Reactor Siafciuar'ds.'has been'ohnceniing thi,.s guide anid.has -oncturred in ý:theýNational Standards Comi-by the Americar,.Nati1oBoard of Standards Rievit-e ý In .addition 'to -the p!::.ANK d,ýslN' *8 and isandards In";it.: g'i.:,-protecsUTreptt::i:S-in:.t,in,.-iAmbi~Wincoý4'y thco,' -.,rnelil --:!i:i> .4 ' .:. :'. -C.in t DI-.DISCUSS!-=kcOTmmittlee '-ANS2;;3 of.-theC:ar. *41 .i":."an..::.::-NuclearC rm,.taenrioun tested for operability at th"e con ::nl a o T.F' ni:i'hat--.t e o t tha n e each, se ven days'. -'4 , -ncshud. s:ary minsite.'ki 'aikr~iis Sindli~jeskchations andL Ccom municatiofl eq cmn, shuldmtaintrusiond1cath*he anuai 'f t tshorld'be otester'withya at m tmumhecannuncaio s~la, n rse onldyuafcter -sthe atop ((4~opetheionng 'of ea~hsch interval durins -AIt intrsionF amTins, h.o..-.,a4arms'.4-* .:...rm Fotheym 'tan e. ..; .1 , ý, ' F ".ý -1 A p~p i ed sgn j~ ueslnidnuld ri 4ldift..I ..annnito thod be res o .Safter sfacto:y -e the beginr,.g df -.ah securt94or..,.e.,. wcF cmmncatin hae artaken pv~ edwef alrm.F'indicated b'y GSAInteriii FderafJý'S S~cifidatio' ragmnsbhid'epoie n-.., other "saf6t:y- requirem.' ents -t6re*duce ' "W-A-l4 A(GALFS)7suc5'esd§f~jrin~d'utriaI sabotage df viyailexen- eas. eqepne~: these'.:.atufes: : .u.V 2. Equiiiment Testing .rettesbe'tee.feli~a: ' Seurity-r"""ted **top'otectagai-st' undetected,, nte*i. :equiment, exept Ar mpair. equipme~nt' performance, -,suidcti oh fiiSp'erabiityAb --:.';;:'" ;:: ... '* '. .::!iii~.i ati:Co- ieý. 'may.be..obtained- frorn usins s rvice:centers of... the Gne.alS ei -i Reginal Offi tesoeat : inwn g wa !. er:v .".. m td .t..- De.ied security:i.mer ftprt~t~ndfte. facility W-gain§$t -irfduiork;'N.Y1 :3 .Sa~n Ca'. .Los:Afi~geles, :Ca ....1"h ¢e=;0 nisiin.'.'e:.. Boston 'Mass. .0-.DeneraCoo. Ka.satCiijwao. e -' epc s... ... ."w ... ..' :;ýaidag ,- CA-. M.. :.. : f c :...('3.=. .5ure.:ýC.. ....C:.'. Was.ngion, D.C*Atlanta, Ga. Stl..Wash; §'790. the-:. Commission' s reguaFt1. Worth,-Texak hiao.Il Part,.2.'V FF ' -FF"' ''FF'£ F F5 F ' FF~ -F FF / ''~'~F ' F F-F S ''F -F F 5FF F ~F. F -F'F V .-~ '' F -F -/F. -F' FF P-F''1F 4F~ 'F-'44 -F F~~FSjFF~.~ -- F' l'FjFF. F1FF?, F-F S-'95F aF"F'CFFFS~...F F. F {frF ~J-F F FF FF F F AF 'F' ~117'~' FF ,FF~FF 'F"F'.V" "-.  
{{#Wiki_filter:w4-,-'U..ATOM~IC ;ENERGY CMISINAM'IDIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDSREGULATORY GUIDE 1.17IO0N.OF NUCLEARý POWER PLANTS AGAINST INDUST'RýIAL S/PROTEC1I1,SI*.-~ -AI44 If-A. I NTRODUCTION.bmuary 1 1973'. the 'Atomic Enilergyihad ýpublishied, i~n the eea ~ rrnendmnents to itsfregulation in :0 OClFR Part.nRsing of ýProdukction, and Utihzi~aion:ý.Prpsd§ 56.5,5c -would requ~ire' ea~chthrie to peate a nuiclear react'or to::.Pppopriate protection against industrdallt'roposed paragr~ph>(c), '-Thysical .Security..ý,50.34 would re'qwie each apphicaticin for,[g lic'iese: to include a~physical security pl~rn.paragrap~h (p) of § ý50.34-wul eýrepsees Who ic have not -subm .i .iIt .t e .dr a physi.c alin to submit such a plan to the Commissionig~6. 1 ..al within 60 dqys after the' pubic-aft n.. of'adments, in effeaiv'eý formi .,Furthermore,.quires ýthat an applicatio'n for a construiction:ide the.princia deign cieat estifethe. iequirements for Structures systems' ad.s esse-i~tial .to 'safety. This. regulatory guideihy~stcal security cnhena, thiat are,'gen~erallyfor the 'protection of uclear pdover.,plants'6f inidustrial sabotage, "which~ could; lead.to a.tihe -health and safiety of the. public Trhe:,oinnyImittee,&on Reactor Siafciuar'ds.'has been'ohnceniing thi,.s guide anid.has -oncturred in ý:theýNational Standards Comi-by the Americar,.Nati1oBoard of Standards Rievit-e ý In .addition 'to -the p!::.ANK d,ýslN' *8 and isandards In";it.: g'i.:,-protecsUTreptt::i:S-in:.t,in,.-iAmbi~Wincoý4'y thco,' -.,rnelil --:!i:i> .4 ' .:. :'. -C.in t DI-.DISCUSS!-=kcOTmmittlee '-ANS2;;3 of.-theC:ar. *41 .i":."an..::.::-NuclearC  
rm,.taenrioun tested for operability at th"e con ::nl a o T.F' ni:i'hat--.t e o t tha n e each, se ven days'. -'4 , -ncshud. s:ary minsite.'ki 'aikr~iis Sindli~jeskchations andL Ccom municatiofl eq cmn, shuldmtaintrusiond1cath*he anuai 'f t tshorld'be otester'withya at m tmumhecannuncaio s~la, n rse onldyuafcter -sthe atop ((4~opetheionng 'of ea~hsch interval durins -AIt intrsionF amTins, h.o..-.,a4arms'.4-* .:...rm Fotheym 'tan e. ..; .1 , ý, ' F ".ý -1 A p~p i ed sgn j~ ueslnidnuld ri 4ldift..I ..annnito thod be res o .Safter sfacto:y -e the beginr,.g df -.ah securt94or..,.e.,. wcF cmmncatin hae artaken pv~ edwef alrm.F'indicated b'y GSAInteriii FderafJý'S S~cifidatio' ragmnsbhid'epoie n-.., other "saf6t:y- requirem.' ents -t6re*duce ' "W-A-l4 A(GALFS)7suc5'esd§f~jrin~d'utriaI sabotage df viyailexen- eas. eqepne~: these'.:.atufes: : .u.V 2. Equiiiment Testing .rettesbe'tee.feli~a: ' Seurity-r"""ted **top'otectagai-st' undetected,, nte*i. :equiment, exept Ar mpair. equipme~nt' performance, -,suidcti oh fiiSp'erabiityAb --:.';;:'" ;:: ... '* '. .::!iii~.i ati:Co- ieý. 'may.be..obtained- frorn usins s rvice:centers of... the Gne.alS ei -i Reginal Offi tesoeat : inwn g wa !. er:v .".. m td .t..- De.ied security:i.mer ftprt~t~ndfte. facility W-gain§$t -irfduiork;'N.Y1 :3 .Sa~n Ca'. .Los:Afi~geles, :Ca ....1"h ¢e=;0 nisiin.'.'e:.. Boston 'Mass. .0-.DeneraCoo. Ka.satCiijwao. e -' epc s... ... ."w ... ..' :;ýaidag ,- CA-. M.. :.. : f c :...('3.=. .5ure.:ýC.. ....C:.'. Was.ngion, D.C*Atlanta, Ga. Stl..Wash; §'790. the-:. Commission' s reguaFt1. Worth,-Texak hiao.Il Part,.2.'V FF ' -FF"' ''FF'£ F F5 F ' FF~ -F FF / ''~'~F ' F F-F S ''F -F F 5FF F ~F. F -F'F V .-~ '' F -F -/F. -F' FF P-F''1F 4F~ 'F-'44 -F F~~FSjFF~.~ -- F' l'FjFF. F1FF?, F-F S-'95F aF"F'CFFFS~...F F. F {frF ~J-F F FF FF F F AF 'F' ~117'~' FF ,FF~FF 'F"F'.V" "-.  
: 7 1.SAFE7YGJE 17 OETON AGAINV;EST INDUSTRIA SABO1TAGEro i noted would f 'individuals in c'er0-In.. sis nMmorandum, and .Oder. dated ti stal....b"fiebrua.. r the Floida Powe idp cftLigl6t case, the, Commirission aro4.ihti w ecalne.nyone attemptn to enterAwh6.'.?I.exect th'e'stafftoas&sect;iir'eV' at the rperaingcense. is notknown by sightV s.st-age :that,, ainm du:s: ria psecurit aeho dfor tat -area Poced'ureskfo4r.iea.re.am -po&#xfd;.&#xfd;pided,-byan .monfi toringp a cogrl' e "SY"against industinl sbotage ii. a -nucle'r..pdwer tepat::and me-ieib ef prsorns-itffiW'.Thi ~~the" !.plant i.rifmyicde,-. nplant; This guide. describes a: suitable:. program t p...t may. inclue id.n..,"- 'fo. po.t.cting against..industrial sa&sect;botage* employees, signing in, and"t itdf 4rs,_.providing:'escorts- fr,..uncleared vidB..: Discussiont and~ challenging the et ry per sons ..-attemnpting to enter vitalareas. -iThe following means canbe employed to .Precautions .also4 are rces:sk.y to,s. can be.pempa ee. toredu " ce thepi'r.bability and effects of. industrial contr-l' the p ...u......&#xfd;Y ,ofzaccess of personnel andIo and 'rr t li pla..i..y,,, it.! .plant: site ('2) selection Procedures , include," appropriateof, plant oferating .ipersonnel, (3).:monitoring of searching, of packages&#xfd; and briefcases 'ofplantiiequipmentd .(4) design and arrangment visitbrs:.and either.forbidding &#xfd;tof plant'features,. or requiring. the'i nnspection,,of &#xfd;.ehicles-'other.than tho~se&#xfd; associated withi&#xfd;p~lant, 4I' 1. C; r -Ol of Access-'A program -for operation are ''effective means:,,in!pr..'tec ion'.against. industrial' isbotage controlling the' 6flow .iof unauth z, -inc lu dqes measures. to -'prevent material"to and from the acce- of .ahrie pesne tote P erso ns re sp Ionsible", fo physical;'.2<p"t-se, copt ri:t.altr6 i,:iieactor.uil .ing, .security atithe ' .,te;a to4her6 italbuildingsi.and quipment management levels shOu o d b tfd-.' ' viiri reas. Cotntir fer6. i ex:tet sho ld be made icI&i 'fo: 4....." he.t'by ther the ultim.ate :: espon ,l ht-..... V.4.' '%. ....y emp oype5o oe&#xfd;pa&#xfd;'t' ngi_11itity enles-ot adr of'he"i- ular suryathe plant Cte~stwith` the plan'0 '"pfant. stf otrco personnel;_:an dsu itndet o- iht&snoreuiy..2necessary.%:fg .measures-urautor ,.&persons Is neesaytooffi'~ Inadion poers, r'"4-';'.'reduce the opprtunt for abotag The% needed to asuepoe orInation~.f&#xfd;-z&#xfd;.-, onrolma be ahieved by eretna betwe~en'the opieratin~ g'nd.'cuna & h.,.'physical b u The' security m.asure........ approp for-the facility-and j~y sta' ioning'guards.: at. em Inr enc cndi:tions- 4;ma'y~ e';.ecJ- &#xfd;4M o acce'ss A program fJore significantly, differenit-- fromtoe osuriveillance 'f the-physical, baie cg. noxnl'oeration--1eeoe~ii'i~y4"~.b. ed, icuitt'elevisio,'. importanat tat, , 0roce' ues b ,"":"-ori'itrsir " jani) wItY assure6 .Ithe .made-conisistent withrothfpl 'co:" e ci a pii .-riat-.., c .in.. , nessi of the barrier-, ' for the' plant oi""eg.-,e"'er y-scurty'"..'edre.shu',be cohistxiAdeq
: 7 1.SAFE7YGJE 17 OETON AGAINV;EST INDUSTRIA SABO1TAGEro i noted would f 'individuals in c'er0-In.. sis nMmorandum, and .Oder. dated ti stal....b"fiebrua.. r the Floida Powe idp cftLigl6t case, the, Commirission aro4.ihti w ecalne.nyone attemptn to enterAwh6.'.?I.exect th'e'stafftoas&sect;iir'eV' at the rperaingcense. is notknown by sightV s.st-age :that,, ainm du:s: ria psecurit aeho dfor tat -area Poced'ureskfo4r.iea.re.am -po&#xfd;.&#xfd;pided,-byan .monfi toringp a cogrl' e "SY"against industinl sbotage ii. a -nucle'r..pdwer tepat::and me-ieib ef prsorns-itffiW'.Thi ~~the" !.plant i.rifmyicde,-. nplant; This guide. describes a: suitable:. program t p...t may. inclue id.n..,"- 'fo. po.t.cting against..industrial sa&sect;botage* employees, signing in, and"t itdf 4rs,_.providing:'escorts- fr,..uncleared vidB..: Discussiont and~ challenging the et ry per sons ..-attemnpting to enter vitalareas. -iThe following means canbe employed to .Precautions .also4 are rces:sk.y to,s. can be.pempa ee. toredu " ce thepi'r.bability and effects of. industrial contr-l' the p ...u......&#xfd;Y ,ofzaccess of personnel andIo and 'rr t li pla..i..y,,, it.! .plant: site ('2) selection Procedures , include," appropriateof, plant oferating .ipersonnel, (3).:monitoring of searching, of packages&#xfd; and briefcases 'ofplantiiequipmentd .(4) design and arrangment visitbrs:.and either.forbidding &#xfd;tof plant'features,. or requiring. the'i nnspection,,of &#xfd;.ehicles-'other.than tho~se&#xfd; associated withi&#xfd;p~lant, 4I' 1. C; r -Ol of Access-'A program -for operation are ''effective means:,,in!pr..'tec ion'.against. industrial' isbotage controlling the' 6flow .iof unauth z, -inc lu dqes measures. to -'prevent material"to and from the acce- of .ahrie pesne tote P erso ns re sp Ionsible", fo physical;'.2<p"t-se, copt ri:t.altr6 i,:iieactor.uil .ing, .security atithe ' .,te;a to4her6 italbuildingsi.and quipment management levels shOu o d b tfd-.' ' viiri reas. Cotntir fer6. i ex:tet sho ld be made icI&i 'fo: 4....." he.t'by ther the ultim.ate :: espon ,l ht-..... V.4.' '%. ....y emp oype5o oe&#xfd;pa&#xfd;'t' ngi_11itity enles-ot adr of'he"i- ular suryathe plant Cte~stwith` the plan'0 '"pfant. stf otrco personnel;_:an dsu itndet o- iht&snoreuiy..2necessary.%:fg .measures-urautor ,.&persons Is neesaytooffi'~ Inadion poers, r'"4-';'.'reduce the opprtunt for abotag The% needed to asuepoe orInation~.f&#xfd;-z&#xfd;.-, onrolma be ahieved by eretna betwe~en'the opieratin~ g'nd.'cuna & h.,.'physical b u The' security m.asure........ approp for-the facility-and j~y sta' ioning'guards.: at. em Inr enc cndi:tions- 4;ma'y~ e';.ecJ- &#xfd;4M o acce'ss A program fJore significantly, differenit-- fromtoe osuriveillance 'f the-physical, baie cg. noxnl'oeration--1eeoe~ii'i~y4"~.b. ed, icuitt'elevisio,'. importanat tat, , 0roce' ues b ,"":"-ori'itrsir " jani) wItY assure6 .Ithe .made-conisistent withrothfpl 'co:" e ci a pii .-riat-.., c .in.. , nessi of the barrier-, ' for the' plant oi""eg.-,e"'er y-scurty'"..'edre.shu',be cohistxiAdeq
* cotrol 6f individu:als withirin"' sectirl" poced~ires "ol :si"n...the '-ite'alsoi mpo.tantfor withthe emergenc p. an)..protection- against industiial sabotage.Th Thh o u 'n y for inutral,: ' conduct fipersons are not sabotage also may be ;.reduced : bypart , of' the oper in' sta ff soud e providing ' locks o'n monitored': wileAey areq aI 'ieplantsite:. ' determiingthe acceptability'of:' "sii": proisi.smeasuresshould itoiifi :equipment Iocks all' relevant saety.tfor 'detect th'e uatorized 'presence' considerations 'in addition to1 7 .1 --..4 A. I -:: -i4 &#xfd;i:..m.ust be evaluated to assure that overall 4. D. esi'&#xfd;safety is enihan~ced by, their use.' Equip....... .."a f pre-pannedcourse, 6f &#xfd;actiom n -the event .of -an actual reasoror '--p"o-tejit~ial r".danger is iprant to of satcontrollig &#xfd;.access to the plant~.' Pro~cedures' that cshotuid pb dfoIrdald1 -with and.&#xfd;pbtbhtial dangers "-such' asr~bheats; arran*al d ;.. .S: * .. ..and" cl yal &#xfd;''_,M&#xfd;r ~ inclding' provif e notificatio fothe indeos&#xfd;properl aiuthoniteds&#xfd; to assuire, aaeffective: againphyicl e-urtyprogram requies prote,-2. eletio oJ :'eronnl -It .~important,......uir~c se. .A. .i.r .0 tha iitily ".managem ent *let[ ad : adiAsiain of ' proftd..... ..tai.;.reliable ...nie ..t..:irotecrtagaiiste oidsr.ialnv saotg. angmetinuar.d ,su -if-ory' to the a.nan, sf is egineerting opera!!!-i6perat.-i..ng 'cthroghou th`,er lifel t ime m of thplnt. Tohens' n standards a"nd C R II3; ...... ... .. ...; .. .Ithractice for eledtif oef aoptntd eguiym a~~tEw~flb~l~c~d diviiias~an proedurspMensdforti "reviieofemi&#xfd;pler'oyeeto prfotmne adprtagansaet -dstraf c.oagn izant omf its ' .irnplentandu.ra superveisor atnecsar'Prsnelon to teadcome tncAd demedwicth f rengardtoplan-pronne,s i dout. te 4shuld60 f'.beT." design oah'ipid. ."t"'s'. irpendedtriip y entsanydetcion of I C~nunustics, e r. ei ti.. -- of. c ...proecio&#xfd;fncd 'agindv ast, indtra Woi ge -plan-'changes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Man 'ste'tts~f~ciia''lnand A p.' ecompoents on- 4er~dimplbasisdurin-.A n stf, 'ro gn~hizan s Oul be. miiat'1reactorsbiit operation. etir aginedto0or, ho~stnasAtatus -hs AundessryPonne a (psin..ap c~dauirn would-help .to.. 'i " .. tisethat -i beostosoasinific~t numtiberof: valves..... (..... Pw .no to, r d ec i!f.rion o...penodsof1 tim 'j:,unsul beairl p? m -o 17.2oye, b-suc Asra-eu rmrgbsI 'AAAAA ~ A It -,rotl)atblllty 'm atage will leald ;;tu-ct releases.,trial sab otage :,'above that 'i:ses, such as ptndant, co~mpstent with other)ry Positionshould be providdures 'should~d to, rduce ,the  
* cotrol 6f individu:als withirin"' sectirl" poced~ires "ol :si"n...the '-ite'alsoi mpo.tantfor withthe emergenc p. an)..protection- against industiial sabotage.Th Thh o u 'n y for inutral,: ' conduct fipersons are not sabotage also may be ;.reduced : bypart , of' the oper in' sta ff soud e providing ' locks o'n monitored': wileAey areq aI 'ieplantsite:. ' determiingthe acceptability'of:' "sii": proisi.smeasuresshould itoiifi :equipment Iocks all' relevant saety.tfor 'detect th'e uatorized 'presence' considerations 'in addition to1 7 .1 --..4 A. I -:: -i4 &#xfd;i:..m.ust be evaluated to assure that overall 4. D. esi'&#xfd;safety is enihan~ced by, their use.' Equip....... .."a f pre-pannedcourse, 6f &#xfd;actiom n -the event .of -an actual reasoror '--p"o-tejit~ial r".danger is iprant to of satcontrollig &#xfd;.access to the plant~.' Pro~cedures' that cshotuid pb dfoIrdald1 -with and.&#xfd;pbtbhtial dangers "-such' asr~bheats; arran*al d ;.. .S: * .. ..and" cl yal &#xfd;''_,M&#xfd;r ~ inclding' provif e notificatio fothe indeos&#xfd;properl aiuthoniteds&#xfd; to assuire, aaeffective: againphyicl e-urtyprogram requies prote,-2. eletio oJ :'eronnl -It .~important,......uir~c se. .A. .i.r .0 tha iitily ".managem ent *let[ ad : adiAsiain of ' proftd..... ..tai.;.reliable ...nie ..t..:irotecrtagaiiste oidsr.ialnv saotg. angmetinuar.d ,su -if-ory' to the a.nan, sf is egineerting opera!!!-i6perat.-i..ng 'cthroghou th`,er lifel t ime m of thplnt. Tohens' n standards a"nd C R II3; ...... ... .. ...; .. .Ithractice for eledtif oef aoptntd eguiym a~~tEw~flb~l~c~d diviiias~an proedurspMensdforti "reviieofemi&#xfd;pler'oyeeto prfotmne adprtagansaet -dstraf c.oagn izant omf its ' .irnplentandu.ra superveisor atnecsar'Prsnelon to teadcome tncAd demedwicth f rengardtoplan-pronne,s i dout. te 4shuld60 f'.beT." design oah'ipid. ."t"'s'. irpendedtriip y entsanydetcion of I C~nunustics, e r. ei ti.. -- of. c ...proecio&#xfd;fncd 'agindv ast, indtra Woi ge -plan-'changes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Man 'ste'tts~f~ciia''lnand A p.' ecompoents on- 4er~dimplbasisdurin-.A n stf, 'ro gn~hizan s Oul be. miiat'1reactorsbiit operation. etir aginedto0or, ho~stnasAtatus -hs AundessryPonne a (psin..ap c~dauirn would-help .to.. 'i " .. tisethat -i beostosoasinific~t numtiberof: valves..... (..... Pw .no to, r d ec i!f.rion o...penodsof1 tim 'j:,unsul beairl p? m -o 17.2oye, b-suc Asra-eu rmrgbsI 'AAAAA ~ A It -,rotl)atblllty 'm atage will leald ;;tu-ct releases.,trial sab otage :,'above that 'i:ses, such as ptndant, co~mpstent with other)ry Positionshould be providdures 'should~d to, rduce ,the  
'Vi! "4 VyV* " 4 : .:Ai:~i 1 %, --i C ....* .h '''Idues r r -y'pi ..:: ,.* : .:.:.. ...:.. , 4. -.-..'..badging of employees, sign i n I ;out-igunugdin acd herfirmance,- O- ." visitorsd, provid inig-", escorts fo'r (c"Poceduresj &#xfd;-oearly detectiobn :,,of 4n:clia engirntie ,nf 'of ..-- bha iay..... atemptig:.toA -.. &p.. te vithlhreas- drug abuse" --------(g)Procediires, for appr-opriate searching (d.)Trainirig of ?Ipersonne 'With, regard to.of visitors; .pl.t.securtyA....:.. -..........................,... .S -Moheonng o i':a, Equipmnent-Meanisz " ' ..........::.. e.d vehi cles gand I -or -.i5 t .- be .h.ior.he satuul be -.provided tormoo,-'seafrhing* y.ehicles~entenniig s&#xfd;ite -;(i rbceduresi associated Wihphysical;VeupetPoeue hudt4Jsecurity tb dAeal wkith"e- emergencies 'at 'vlpdadpronltandt--theplait -identify equipment. that may have been 'i .---Wihdisrabled Or whose status may..hv(j) Prolcdtiregs, for dedling. wihunegoe-d.angers sisuciasbonib;tlfeats 6and :"..und-" gone unauthoriz h ze-ivave'closed whenfit slfouldbeoendisturbfbancs UIUUU.gFU M iiS xo , .I.'' i-i:i:ii:iI "..;:.i.::...authonties. ."*. .. kq i m n 'pp .rat desig ....".t. ";: -*. r(k)*Nocedures: for investigation f ISecU t -.a... qi p t', banpgedm eno b-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ,-icdnsadfrad scryprvdd -ad 2lbe, coni3~stent With, -other,,4'. .--~j~f~y iing f th safe'.ty -.requirements' 6 'to' edce t&4&#xa3;--un program;. o 'ppo~rtunity ' tbfr- successfu i dind~tnial-"'2. Sel --'m1 LAT'i6 mean....&#xa3;*. eec o-- o PersnneT.e -meas. " .,sabotage.-2-:" : ..!. .provieaided t. ,asure' a staff an.t " .". .. .,.. -I(a)EsItaishmnenrit. "of employment* .prot'ection bf " I"a aist7 fustr"al-=j1 ,a --..itag will, bet _witihi f~K pbi-ta d 'rd and pra ctices -th 4: po' d sab oIdafrom.. ....*>,--for -e lectio6n -.f comp:e tient, ..u. re as prqovided' in ";:&sect;'1-790dof..h.i.i. !. ,.iwell-balanced individuals;",. '." Commission'sregulations in Parn,".,. : i :44 --.,"eli "nc *ni'~ i`s ." Pa .2"."". " '''"' v .-:-':...., .-.*. ... .: 4j,"4 ... .-... A-. 7.3 -1 -*!% ::.4 * .,-. ... .: ..-. .. ..- -* .4 :-" .1 -1 .3 .... 4 ---,.4 .' .... ., , ,. , .-. ." .. " ., ... -:.: -.t. ' -. -..-.,..'[.':.}}
'Vi! "4 VyV* " 4 : .:Ai:~i 1 %, --i C ....* .h '''Idues r r -y'pi ..:: ,.* : .:.:.. ...:.. , 4. -.-..'..badging of employees, sign i n I ;out-igunugdin acd herfirmance,- O- ." visitorsd, provid inig-", escorts fo'r (c"Poceduresj &#xfd;-oearly detectiobn :,,of 4n:clia engirntie ,nf 'of ..-- bha iay..... atemptig:.toA -.. &p.. te vithlhreas- drug abuse" --------(g)Procediires, for appr-opriate searching (d.)Trainirig of ?Ipersonne 'With, regard to.of visitors; .pl.t.securtyA....:.. -..........................,... .S -Moheonng o i':a, Equipmnent-Meanisz " ' ..........::.. e.d vehi cles gand I -or -.i5 t .- be .h.ior.he satuul be -.provided tormoo,-'seafrhing* y.ehicles~entenniig s&#xfd;ite -;(i rbceduresi associated Wihphysical;VeupetPoeue hudt4Jsecurity tb dAeal wkith"e- emergencies 'at 'vlpdadpronltandt--theplait -identify equipment. that may have been 'i .---Wihdisrabled Or whose status may..hv(j) Prolcdtiregs, for dedling. wihunegoe-d.angers sisuciasbonib;tlfeats 6and :"..und-" gone unauthoriz h ze-ivave'closed whenfit slfouldbeoendisturbfbancs UIUUU.gFU M iiS xo , .I.'' i-i:i:ii:iI "..;:.i.::...authonties. ."*. .. kq i m n 'pp .rat desig ....".t. ";: -*. r(k)*Nocedures: for investigation f ISecU t -.a... qi p t', banpgedm eno b-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ,-icdnsadfrad scryprvdd -ad 2lbe, coni3~stent With, -other,,4'. .--~j~f~y iing f th safe'.ty -.requirements' 6 'to' edce t&4&#xa3;--un program;. o 'ppo~rtunity ' tbfr- successfu i dind~tnial-"'2. Sel --'m1 LAT'i6 mean....&#xa3;*. eec o-- o PersnneT.e -meas. " .,sabotage.-2-:" : ..!. .provieaided t. ,asure' a staff an.t " .". .. .,.. -I(a)EsItaishmnenrit. "of employment* .prot'ection bf " I"a aist7 fustr"al-=j1 ,a --..itag will, bet _witihi f~K pbi-ta d 'rd and pra ctices -th 4: po' d sab oIdafrom.. ....*>,--for -e lectio6n -.f comp:e tient, ..u. re as prqovided' in ";:&sect;'1-790dof..h.i.i. !. ,.iwell-balanced individuals;",. '." Commission'sregulations in Parn,".,. : i :44 --.,"eli "nc *ni'~ i`s ." Pa .2"."". " '''"' v .-:-':...., .-.*. ... .: 4j,"4 ... .-... A-. 7.3 -1 -*!% ::.4 * .,-. ... .: ..-. .. ..- -* .4 :-" .1 -1 .3 .... 4 ---,.4 .' .... ., , ,. , .-. ." .. " ., ... -:.: -.t. ' -. -..-.,..'[.':.  
}}


{{RG-Nav}}
{{RG-Nav}}

Revision as of 06:35, 28 March 2018

Protection of Nuclear Power Plants Against Industrial Sabotage
ML13038A423
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/30/1973
From:
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
References
RG-1.017
Download: ML13038A423 (5)
v • d • e


w4-,-'U..ATOM~IC ;ENERGY CMISINAM'IDIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDSREGULATORY GUIDE 1.17IO0N.OF NUCLEARý POWER PLANTS AGAINST INDUST'RýIAL S/PROTEC1I1,SI*.-~ -AI44 If-A. I NTRODUCTION.bmuary 1 1973'. the 'Atomic Enilergyihad ýpublishied, i~n the eea ~ rrnendmnents to itsfregulation in :0 OClFR Part.nRsing of ýProdukction, and Utihzi~aion:ý.Prpsd§ 56.5,5c -would requ~ire' ea~chthrie to peate a nuiclear react'or to::.Pppopriate protection against industrdallt'roposed paragr~ph>(c), '-Thysical .Security..ý,50.34 would re'qwie each apphicaticin for,[g lic'iese: to include a~physical security pl~rn.paragrap~h (p) of § ý50.34-wul eýrepsees Who ic have not -subm .i .iIt .t e .dr a physi.c alin to submit such a plan to the Commissionig~6. 1 ..al within 60 dqys after the' pubic-aft n.. of'adments, in effeaiv'eý formi .,Furthermore,.quires ýthat an applicatio'n for a construiction:ide the.princia deign cieat estifethe. iequirements for Structures systems' ad.s esse-i~tial .to 'safety. This. regulatory guideihy~stcal security cnhena, thiat are,'gen~erallyfor the 'protection of uclear pdover.,plants'6f inidustrial sabotage, "which~ could; lead.to a.tihe -health and safiety of the. public Trhe:,oinnyImittee,&on Reactor Siafciuar'ds.'has been'ohnceniing thi,.s guide anid.has -oncturred in ý:theýNational Standards Comi-by the Americar,.Nati1oBoard of Standards Rievit-e ý In .addition 'to -the p!::.ANK d,ýslN' *8 and isandards In";it.: g'i.:,-protecsUTreptt::i:S-in:.t,in,.-iAmbi~Wincoý4'y thco,' -.,rnelil --:!i:i> .4 ' .:. :'. -C.in t DI-.DISCUSS!-=kcOTmmittlee '-ANS2;;3 of.-theC:ar. *41 .i":."an..::.::-NuclearC

rm,.taenrioun tested for operability at th"e con ::nl a o T.F' ni:i'hat--.t e o t tha n e each, se ven days'. -'4 , -ncshud. s:ary minsite.'ki 'aikr~iis Sindli~jeskchations andL Ccom municatiofl eq cmn, shuldmtaintrusiond1cath*he anuai 'f t tshorld'be otester'withya at m tmumhecannuncaio s~la, n rse onldyuafcter -sthe atop ((4~opetheionng 'of ea~hsch interval durins -AIt intrsionF amTins, h.o..-.,a4arms'.4-* .:...rm Fotheym 'tan e. ..; .1 , ý, ' F ".ý -1 A p~p i ed sgn j~ ueslnidnuld ri 4ldift..I ..annnito thod be res o .Safter sfacto:y -e the beginr,.g df -.ah securt94or..,.e.,. wcF cmmncatin hae artaken pv~ edwef alrm.F'indicated b'y GSAInteriii FderafJý'S S~cifidatio' ragmnsbhid'epoie n-.., other "saf6t:y- requirem.' ents -t6re*duce ' "W-A-l4 A(GALFS)7suc5'esd§f~jrin~d'utriaI sabotage df viyailexen- eas. eqepne~: these'.:.atufes: : .u.V 2. Equiiiment Testing .rettesbe'tee.feli~a: ' Seurity-r"""ted **top'otectagai-st' undetected,, nte*i. :equiment, exept Ar mpair. equipme~nt' performance, -,suidcti oh fiiSp'erabiityAb --:.';;:'" ;:: ... '* '. .::!iii~.i ati:Co- ieý. 'may.be..obtained- frorn usins s rvice:centers of... the Gne.alS ei -i Reginal Offi tesoeat : inwn g wa !. er:v .".. m td .t..- De.ied security:i.mer ftprt~t~ndfte. facility W-gain§$t -irfduiork;'N.Y1 :3 .Sa~n Ca'. .Los:Afi~geles, :Ca ....1"h ¢e=;0 nisiin.'.'e:.. Boston 'Mass. .0-.DeneraCoo. Ka.satCiijwao. e -' epc s... ... ."w ... ..' :;ýaidag ,- CA-. M.. :.. : f c :...('3.=. .5ure.:ýC.. ....C:.'. Was.ngion, D.C*Atlanta, Ga. Stl..Wash; §'790. the-:. Commission' s reguaFt1. Worth,-Texak hiao.Il Part,.2.'V FF ' -FF"' FF'£ F F5 F ' FF~ -F FF / ~'~F ' F F-F S F -F F 5FF F ~F. F -F'F V .-~ F -F -/F. -F' FF P-F1F 4F~ 'F-'44 -F F~~FSjFF~.~ -- F' l'FjFF. F1FF?, F-F S-'95F aF"F'CFFFS~...F F. F {frF ~J-F F FF FF F F AF 'F' ~117'~' FF ,FF~FF 'F"F'.V" "-.

7 1.SAFE7YGJE 17 OETON AGAINV;EST INDUSTRIA SABO1TAGEro i noted would f 'individuals in c'er0-In.. sis nMmorandum, and .Oder. dated ti stal....b"fiebrua.. r the Floida Powe idp cftLigl6t case, the, Commirission aro4.ihti w ecalne.nyone attemptn to enterAwh6.'.?I.exect th'e'stafftoas§iir'eV' at the rperaingcense. is notknown by sightV s.st-age :that,, ainm du:s: ria psecurit aeho dfor tat -area Poced'ureskfo4r.iea.re.am -poý.ýpided,-byan .monfi toringp a cogrl' e "SY"against industinl sbotage ii. a -nucle'r..pdwer tepat::and me-ieib ef prsorns-itffiW'.Thi ~~the" !.plant i.rifmyicde,-. nplant; This guide. describes a: suitable:. program t p...t may. inclue id.n..,"- 'fo. po.t.cting against..industrial sa§botage* employees, signing in, and"t itdf 4rs,_.providing:'escorts- fr,..uncleared vidB..: Discussiont and~ challenging the et ry per sons ..-attemnpting to enter vitalareas. -iThe following means canbe employed to .Precautions .also4 are rces:sk.y to,s. can be.pempa ee. toredu " ce thepi'r.bability and effects of. industrial contr-l' the p ...u......ýY ,ofzaccess of personnel andIo and 'rr t li pla..i..y,,, it.! .plant: site ('2) selection Procedures , include," appropriateof, plant oferating .ipersonnel, (3).:monitoring of searching, of packagesý and briefcases 'ofplantiiequipmentd .(4) design and arrangment visitbrs:.and either.forbidding ýtof plant'features,. or requiring. the'i nnspection,,of ý.ehicles-'other.than tho~seý associated withiýp~lant, 4I' 1. C; r -Ol of Access-'A program -for operation are effective means:,,in!pr..'tec ion'.against. industrial' isbotage controlling the' 6flow .iof unauth z, -inc lu dqes measures. to -'prevent material"to and from the acce- of .ahrie pesne tote P erso ns re sp Ionsible", fo physical;'.2<p"t-se, copt ri:t.altr6 i,:iieactor.uil .ing, .security atithe ' .,te;a to4her6 italbuildingsi.and quipment management levels shOu o d b tfd-.' ' viiri reas. Cotntir fer6. i ex:tet sho ld be made icI&i 'fo: 4....." he.t'by ther the ultim.ate :: espon ,l ht-..... V.4.' '%. ....y emp oype5o oeýpaý't' ngi_11itity enles-ot adr of'he"i- ular suryathe plant Cte~stwith` the plan'0 '"pfant. stf otrco personnel;_:an dsu itndet o- iht&snoreuiy..2necessary.%:fg .measures-urautor ,.&persons Is neesaytooffi'~ Inadion poers, r'"4-';'.'reduce the opprtunt for abotag The% needed to asuepoe orInation~.fý-zý.-, onrolma be ahieved by eretna betwe~en'the opieratin~ g'nd.'cuna & h.,.'physical b u The' security m.asure........ approp for-the facility-and j~y sta' ioning'guards.: at. em Inr enc cndi:tions- 4;ma'y~ e';.ecJ- ý4M o acce'ss A program fJore significantly, differenit-- fromtoe osuriveillance 'f the-physical, baie cg. noxnl'oeration--1eeoe~ii'i~y4"~.b. ed, icuitt'elevisio,'. importanat tat, , 0roce' ues b ,"":"-ori'itrsir " jani) wItY assure6 .Ithe .made-conisistent withrothfpl 'co:" e ci a pii .-riat-.., c .in.. , nessi of the barrier-, ' for the' plant oi""eg.-,e"'er y-scurty'"..'edre.shu',be cohistxiAdeq
  • cotrol 6f individu:als withirin"' sectirl" poced~ires "ol :si"n...the '-ite'alsoi mpo.tantfor withthe emergenc p. an)..protection- against industiial sabotage.Th Thh o u 'n y for inutral,: ' conduct fipersons are not sabotage also may be ;.reduced : bypart , of' the oper in' sta ff soud e providing ' locks o'n monitored': wileAey areq aI 'ieplantsite:. ' determiingthe acceptability'of:' "sii": proisi.smeasuresshould itoiifi :equipment Iocks all' relevant saety.tfor 'detect th'e uatorized 'presence' considerations 'in addition to1 7 .1 --..4 A. I -:: -i4 ýi:..m.ust be evaluated to assure that overall 4. D. esi'ýsafety is enihan~ced by, their use.' Equip....... .."a f pre-pannedcourse, 6f ýactiom n -the event .of -an actual reasoror '--p"o-tejit~ial r".danger is iprant to of satcontrollig ý.access to the plant~.' Pro~cedures' that cshotuid pb dfoIrdald1 -with and.ýpbtbhtial dangers "-such' asr~bheats; arran*al d ;.. .S: * .. ..and" cl yal ý_,Mýr ~ inclding' provif e notificatio fothe indeosýproperl aiuthonitedsý to assuire, aaeffective: againphyicl e-urtyprogram requies prote,-2. eletio oJ :'eronnl -It .~important,......uir~c se. .A. .i.r .0 tha iitily ".managem ent *let[ ad : adiAsiain of ' proftd..... ..tai.;.reliable ...nie ..t..:irotecrtagaiiste oidsr.ialnv saotg. angmetinuar.d ,su -if-ory' to the a.nan, sf is egineerting opera!!!-i6perat.-i..ng 'cthroghou th`,er lifel t ime m of thplnt. Tohens' n standards a"nd C R II3; ...... ... .. ...; .. .Ithractice for eledtif oef aoptntd eguiym a~~tEw~flb~l~c~d diviiias~an proedurspMensdforti "reviieofemiýpler'oyeeto prfotmne adprtagansaet -dstraf c.oagn izant omf its ' .irnplentandu.ra superveisor atnecsar'Prsnelon to teadcome tncAd demedwicth f rengardtoplan-pronne,s i dout. te 4shuld60 f'.beT." design oah'ipid. ."t"'s'. irpendedtriip y entsanydetcion of I C~nunustics, e r. ei ti.. -- of. c ...proecioýfncd 'agindv ast, indtra Woi ge -plan-'changes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Man 'ste'tts~f~ciialnand A p.' ecompoents on- 4er~dimplbasisdurin-.A n stf, 'ro gn~hizan s Oul be. miiat'1reactorsbiit operation. etir aginedto0or, ho~stnasAtatus -hs AundessryPonne a (psin..ap c~dauirn would-help .to.. 'i " .. tisethat -i beostosoasinific~t numtiberof: valves..... (..... Pw .no to, r d ec i!f.rion o...penodsof1 tim 'j:,unsul beairl p? m -o 17.2oye, b-suc Asra-eu rmrgbsI 'AAAAA ~ A It -,rotl)atblllty 'm atage will leald ;;tu-ct releases.,trial sab otage :,'above that 'i:ses, such as ptndant, co~mpstent with other)ry Positionshould be providdures 'should~d to, rduce ,the

'Vi! "4 VyV* " 4  : .:Ai:~i 1 %, --i C ....* .h Idues r r -y'pi ..:: ,.* : .:.:.. ...:.. , 4. -.-..'..badging of employees, sign i n I ;out-igunugdin acd herfirmance,- O- ." visitorsd, provid inig-", escorts fo'r (c"Poceduresj ý-oearly detectiobn :,,of 4n:clia engirntie ,nf 'of ..-- bha iay..... atemptig:.toA -.. &p.. te vithlhreas- drug abuse" --------(g)Procediires, for appr-opriate searching (d.)Trainirig of ?Ipersonne 'With, regard to.of visitors; .pl.t.securtyA....:.. -..........................,... .S -Moheonng o i':a, Equipmnent-Meanisz " ' ..........::.. e.d vehi cles gand I -or -.i5 t .- be .h.ior.he satuul be -.provided tormoo,-'seafrhing* y.ehicles~entenniig sýite -;(i rbceduresi associated Wihphysical;VeupetPoeue hudt4Jsecurity tb dAeal wkith"e- emergencies 'at 'vlpdadpronltandt--theplait -identify equipment. that may have been 'i .---Wihdisrabled Or whose status may..hv(j) Prolcdtiregs, for dedling. wihunegoe-d.angers sisuciasbonib;tlfeats 6and :"..und-" gone unauthoriz h ze-ivave'closed whenfit slfouldbeoendisturbfbancs UIUUU.gFU M iiS xo , .I. i-i:i:ii:iI "..;:.i.::...authonties. ."*. .. kq i m n 'pp .rat desig ....".t. ";: -*. r(k)*Nocedures: for investigation f ISecU t -.a... qi p t', banpgedm eno b-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ,-icdnsadfrad scryprvdd -ad 2lbe, coni3~stent With, -other,,4'. .--~j~f~y iing f th safe'.ty -.requirements' 6 'to' edce t&4£--un program;. o 'ppo~rtunity ' tbfr- successfu i dind~tnial-"'2. Sel --'m1 LAT'i6 mean....£*. eec o-- o PersnneT.e -meas. " .,sabotage.-2-:" : ..!. .provieaided t. ,asure' a staff an.t " .". .. .,.. -I(a)EsItaishmnenrit. "of employment* .prot'ection bf " I"a aist7 fustr"al-=j1 ,a --..itag will, bet _witihi f~K pbi-ta d 'rd and pra ctices -th 4: po' d sab oIdafrom.. ....*>,--for -e lectio6n -.f comp:e tient, ..u. re as prqovided' in ";:§'1-790dof..h.i.i. !. ,.iwell-balanced individuals;",. '." Commission'sregulations in Parn,".,. : i :44 --.,"eli "nc *ni'~ i`s ." Pa .2"."". " "' v .-:-':...., .-.*. ... .: 4j,"4 ... .-... A-. 7.3 -1 -*!% ::.4 * .,-. ... .: ..-. .. ..- -* .4 :-" .1 -1 .3 .... 4 ---,.4 .' .... ., , ,. , .-. ." .. " ., ... -:.: -.t. ' -. -..-.,..'[.':.


Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=Regulatory_Guide_1.17&oldid=522016"