ML15328A079: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:APPENDIX FCredentials ADAM J. WHITEENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. White, a staff Environmental Scientist in Terracon's  
{{#Wiki_filter:APPENDIX F Credentials
: Columbia, Mo.office, is responsible for conducting environmental services.
 
He isresponsible for the field services and development of reports for a widerange of projects performed.
ADAM J. WHITE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. White, a staff Environmental Scientist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo.
His primary environmental duties involveperformance and report development for Phase I environmental siteassessments, Phase II site assessments and remediation  
office, is responsible for conducting environmental services. He is responsible for the field services and development of reports for a wide range of projects performed. His primary environmental duties involve performance and report development for Phase I environmental site assessments, Phase II site assessments and remediation projects, wetland delineations, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews.
: projects, wetlanddelineations, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews.RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
* Deer Valley Apartment,  
* Deer Valley Apartment, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) on a multi-family residential apartment complex for Prudential Mortgage Capital Company.
: Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) on a multi-family residential apartment complex for Prudential Mortgage Capital Company.* Colt Railroad,  
* Colt Railroad, Columbia, Missouri Performed on-site soil sampling related to identifying petroleum and metals contaminated soils on the site.
: Columbia, MissouriPerformed on-site soil sampling related to identifying petroleum andmetals contaminated soils on the site.* Beatrice Cheese, New Hampton, IowaPerformed on-site remediatory supervision and site conditions monitoring associated with the remediation of petroleum contaminated soils on thesite using subsurface injection methods.* Flat Branch Park Phase II, Columbia, MO.Conducted data review and assisted with report developmernt for EPABrownfield project associated with remediation of site impacted by formerpetroleum bulk storage facilities.  
* Beatrice Cheese, New Hampton, Iowa Performed on-site remediatory supervision and site conditions monitoring associated with the remediation of petroleum contaminated soils on the site using subsurface injection methods.
.* Cell Tower Sites, Missouri and KansasPerformed Phase I ESAs and NEPA assessments as they applied to thedevelopment associated with co-located and raw land tower sites forVerizon Wireless throughout Missouri and Kansas.* Agriculture Storage Facilities, KansasPerformed on-site soil, groundwater, and surface water sampling, at 10agricultural fertilizer/pesticide facilities in Kansas.* Missouri  
* Flat Branch Park Phase II, Columbia, MO.
: Theatre, Columbia, MissouriPerformed a Phase I ESA and report development for the renovation ofthe historic Missouri Theatre building.
Conducted data review and assisted with report developmernt for EPA Brownfield project associated with remediation of site impacted by former petroleum bulk storage facilities.
The site is located in downtownColumbia and was the former location of a drycleaner and printing facility.
* Cell Tower Sites, Missouri and Kansas Performed Phase I ESAs and NEPA assessments as they applied to the development associated with co-located and raw land tower sites for Verizon Wireless throughout Missouri and Kansas.
* Underground Storage Tank Removal,  
* Agriculture Storage Facilities, Kansas Performed on-site soil, groundwater, and surface water sampling, at 10 agricultural fertilizer/pesticide facilities in Kansas.
: Moberly, MissouriProvided oversight, documentation, and sampling of contaminated soilsduring the excavation,  
* Missouri Theatre, Columbia, Missouri Performed a Phase I ESA and report development for the renovation of the historic Missouri Theatre building. The site is located in downtown Columbia and was the former location of a drycleaner and printing facility.
: removal, and closure of an underground petroleum storage tank.* Hy-Vee, Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase I ESA and on-site soil and groundwater sampling forproposed Hy-Vee grocery stores and gas station.* Agricultural Storage Facility,  
* Underground Storage Tank Removal, Moberly, Missouri Provided oversight, documentation, and sampling of contaminated soils during the excavation, removal, and closure of an underground petroleum storage tank.
: Trenton, MissouriConducted Phase I ESA and Missouri Department of Natural Resources EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Agricultural System Management, Minor SoilScience, 2005, University ofMissouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS  
* Hy-Vee, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and on-site soil and groundwater sampling for proposed Hy-Vee grocery stores and gas station.
*OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPERWetland Delineation Red Cross First AidWORK HISTORYTerracon, Environmental Scientist, 2006-present; University of Missouri-Columbia, Soil Characterization Lab, 200606/05 White, Adam J. 2(MDNR) file review for the historic agricultural chemical facility.
* Agricultural Storage Facility, Trenton, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA and Missouri Department of Natural Resources EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Agricultural System Management, Minor Soil Science, 2005, University of Missouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS
*Hinton Little General Stores -Hinton, MissouriConducted site characterization and risk based corrective actionassessment consisting of soil and groundwater sampling of leakingunderground storage tank site.*Autozone, Marshfield, MissouriProvided Phase I ESA and MDNR file review on a vacant tract of land,historically the location of a gasoline station with leaking underground storage tanks.*Caterpillar  
* OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Wetland Delineation Red Cross First Aid WORK HISTORY Terracon, Environmental Scientist, 2006-present; University of Missouri-Columbia, Soil Characterization Lab, 2006 06/05
: Facility, Boonville, MissouriConducted Phase I ESA for a Caterpillar equipment manufacturing facility.
 
The facility was a large quantity generator that uses multiple*hazardous substances for operations at the site.*Prairie Queen, Centralia, MissouriConducted Phase I ESA on a gasoline station facility located in proximity to off-site gasoline stations.
White, Adam J. 2 (MDNR) file review for the historic agricultural chemical facility.
*AmerenUE, Callaway Nuclear Power PlantPreformed soil and groundwater sample collection for radiological parameters laboratory testing.
*Hinton Little General Stores - Hinton, Missouri Conducted site characterization and risk based corrective action assessment consisting of soil and groundwater sampling of leaking underground storage tank site.
Sample collection locations include thehighly secure Protected Area.*Hudson Hallow, Osage Beach, MissouriProvided consultation regarding on-site wetlands including:
*Autozone, Marshfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and MDNR file review on a vacant tract of land, historically the location of a gasoline station with leaking underground storage tanks.
coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
*Caterpillar Facility, Boonville, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA for a Caterpillar equipment manufacturing facility.
and Section 404 CleanWater Act (CWA) regulatory permitting.
The facility was a large quantity generator that uses multiple
*O'Reilly Auto Parts, MissouriProvided Phase I ESAs on six stores located in central Missouri.
*hazardous substances for operations at the site.
*City of Springfield, MissouriProvided Phase I ESAs on six sites located in the historic Jordan Valleydowntown area of Springfield, MO.*401 S. Maple Avenue and 1057 Colfax Avenue, Hannibal, MissouriProvided PhaselI ESA on a screen printing business located adjacent tothe former location of a manufactured gas plant.*Asbestos Air Sampling, MissouriProvided asbestos air sampling at sites which include churches, university dormitories, factories, and Bagnell Dam.06105 MARK E. DIERKERFIELD GEOLO GIS TPROFESS IONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Dierker, a Field Geologist in Terracon's  
*Prairie Queen, Centralia, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA on a gasoline station facility located in proximity to off-site gasoline stations.
: Columbia, Mo. office, isresponsible for conducting environmental and geotechnical services.
*AmerenUE, Callaway Nuclear Power Plant Preformed soil and groundwater sample collection for radiological parameters laboratory testing.
He isresponsible for working with drilling crews performing field services, soiland groundwater  
Sample collection locations include the highly secure Protected Area.
: sampling, and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs).RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
*Hudson Hallow, Osage Beach, Missouri Provided consultation regarding on-site wetlands including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting.
* Bright Start Academy,  
*O'Reilly Auto Parts, Missouri Provided Phase I ESAs on six stores located in central Missouri.
: Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as a child care facility.
*City of Springfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESAs on six sites located in the historic Jordan Valley downtown area of Springfield, MO.
* Proposed Firestone,  
*401 S. Maple Avenue and 1057 Colfax Avenue, Hannibal, Missouri Provided PhaselI ESA on a screen printing business located adjacent to the former location of a manufactured gas plant.
: Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as an autocare facility.
*Asbestos Air Sampling, Missouri Provided asbestos air sampling at sites which include churches, university dormitories, factories, and Bagnell Dam.
* Father Tolton Catholic High School, Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase I ESA for site to be developed as a high school.* Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Reform, MissouriConducts groundwater sampling from monitoring well network andperforms field services with monitoring well abandonment and wellinstallations.
06105
* Con-Agg, LLC, Columbia, MissouriQuality control manager responsible for management of aggregate andconcrete materials testing lab and quarry inventories.
 
* Engineering Surveys and Services,  
MARK E. DIERKER FIELD GEOLO GIS T PROFESS IONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Dierker, a Field Geologist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo. office, is responsible for conducting environmental and geotechnical services. He is responsible for working with drilling crews performing field services, soil and groundwater sampling, and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs).
: Columbia, MissouriPerformed field and laboratory testing of concrete, soils, and aggregate.
RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Geology,2000, University of Missouri-ColumbiaCERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPERNuclear Soil Gauge Certification Red Cross First AidWORK HIS TORYTerracon Consultants, Inc.Field Geologist, September 20 10-presentConn-Agg, LLC ,Boone QuarriesQuality Control Manager,January 2004 -August 2009Engineering Surveys and Services, Materials Tech, April 2003-December 200306/05 TRACIE A. RAGLANDENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGERPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Ms. Ragland has 9 years of general environmental experience.
* Bright Start Academy, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as a child care facility.
Ms.Ragland performs various duties including Phase I Environmental SiteAssessments (Phase I ESAs), wetland delineations, asbestos inspections, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reviews.
* Proposed Firestone, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as an autocare facility.
Ms. Ragland hasalso prepared Phase I ESAs in association with Brownfields Assessments and some Limited.
* Father Tolton Catholic High School, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA for site to be developed as a high school.
Site Investigations (LSls). Her duties include clientinteraction; scheduling and/or performing project field work; interviews withsite contacts, state, and local government officials; analytical interpretation of research databases and historical records; wetland plant and hydric soilidentifications; interpretation and analysis of maps, aerial photographs, andsoil surveys; wetland site survey coordination; calculation of wetlandimpacts; asbestos inspection and sampling; groundwater and soil collection and interpretation of laboratory analytical results; and preparation andproduction of client deliverables.
* Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Reform, Missouri Conducts groundwater sampling from monitoring well network and performs field services with monitoring well abandonment and well installations.
Ms. Ragland also has management responsibility of Phase I ESA projectswithin the Due Diligence Group (DDG) at Terracon.
* Con-Agg, LLC, Columbia, Missouri Quality control manager responsible for management of aggregate and concrete materials testing lab and quarry inventories.
Duties includeoversight of projects, assignment of projects, technical review of clientdeliverables, supervision of DDG members, and training of Phase I ESApersonnel.
* Engineering Surveys and Services, Columbia, Missouri Performed field and laboratory testing of concrete, soils, and aggregate.
Ms. Ragland has also served as Acting Group Manager of theDDG on several occasions.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Geology, 2000, University of Missouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Nuclear Soil Gauge Certification Red Cross First Aid WORK HIS TORY Terracon Consultants, Inc.
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES* Phase I ESAsConducted and managed over 300 Phase I ESAs for 9 years throughout the continental US, including undeveloped land, communications towers,multi-family residential structures, large-scale commercial developments, gasoline refueling  
Field Geologist, September 20 10-present Conn-Agg, LLC,Boone Quarries Quality Control Manager, January 2004 - August 2009 Engineering Surveys and Services, Materials Tech, April 2003-December 2003 06/05
: stations, automobile repair facilities, industrial sites,printing facilities, dry cleaners, agricultural cooperative facilities, and USPostal Service Offices.* Wetland Delineations Conducts and manages wetland delineations and wetland permitting projects in KS and MO, including:
 
coordination with the US Army Corps ofEngineers (USACE),
TRACIE A. RAGLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Ms. Ragland has 9 years of general environmental experience. Ms.
and report preparation for Section 404 Clean WaterAct (CWA) regulatory permitting.
Ragland performs various duties including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I ESAs), wetland delineations, asbestos inspections, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reviews. Ms. Ragland has also prepared Phase I ESAs in association with Brownfields Assessments and some Limited. Site Investigations (LSls). Her duties include client interaction; scheduling and/or performing project field work; interviews with site contacts, state, and local government officials; analytical interpretation of research databases and historical records; wetland plant and hydric soil identifications; interpretation and analysis of maps, aerial photographs, and soil surveys; wetland site survey coordination; calculation of wetland impacts; asbestos inspection and sampling; groundwater and soil collection and interpretation of laboratory analytical results; and preparation and production of client deliverables.
Delineated sites from 1 to 8,000 acres.Responsible for onsite wetland delineations utilizing mandatory technical criteria and field indicators established by the USACE and, whennecessary, by the USDA (National Food Security Act Manual and FieldIndicators of Hydric Soils in the US).* Asbestos Inspections and SamplingIn conjunction with Phase I ESAs, conducts limited asbestos inspections and sampling of properties ranging from multi-family residential structures and commercial developments to heavy industrial sites in KSand MO.* NEPA ReviewslEnvironlmenltal Assessment (EA)Conducted NEPA Reviews for existing and proposed communications towers and a fiber optic cable corridor, including an EA for a proposedmarina at a USACE lake. Responsible for field work, contact with federal,state, and local government  
Ms. Ragland also has management responsibility of Phase I ESA projects within the Due Diligence Group (DDG) at Terracon. Duties include oversight of projects, assignment of projects, technical review of client deliverables, supervision of DDG members, and training of Phase I ESA personnel. Ms. Ragland has also served as Acting Group Manager of the DDG on several occasions.
: agencies, coordination of Cultural ResourceInvestigation for historical preservation clearance, and production of client2/07EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Honors inEnvironmental
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES
: Studies, 1997,University of KansasBachelor of Science in Biology,Cellular  
* Phase I ESAs Conducted and managed over 300 Phase I ESAs for 9 years throughout the continental US, including undeveloped land, communications towers, multi-family residential structures, large-scale commercial developments, gasoline refueling stations, automobile repair facilities, industrial sites, printing facilities, dry cleaners, agricultural cooperative facilities, and US Postal Service Offices.
: Biology, 1992,University of KansasCE RTI FICATI ONS40-Hour Hazardous Waste SiteOperations
* Wetland Delineations Conducts and manages wetland delineations and wetland permitting projects in KS and MO, including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and report preparation for Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting. Delineated sites from 1 to 8,000 acres.
: Training, 1999AHERA Asbestos Inspector:
Responsible for onsite wetland delineations utilizing mandatory technical criteria and field indicators established by the USACE and, when necessary, by the USDA (National Food Security Act Manual and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the US).
Kansas, Missouri, 1998Category A Certification inRadioisotopes and Radiation Safety in Research, 1997AFFILIATIONS Society of Wetland Scientists WORK HISTORYTerracon, Environmental Scientist, 1998-present University of Kansas, ResearchAssistant; 1994-1998 University of Minnesota, GraduateResearch Assistant, 1993-1994 Oklahoma State University, Laboratory Technician, 1992-1993ADDITIONAL COURSESWetland Construction andRestoration, Wetland TrainingInstitute, 2001Wetland Plant Identification, BioticConsultants, Inc., 2000Basic Processes in Hydric Soils,North Carolina State University, 200038-Hour Army Corns of Engineers Wetland Delineation  
* Asbestos Inspections and Sampling In conjunction with Phase I ESAs, conducts limited asbestos inspections and sampling of properties ranging from multi-family residential structures and commercial developments to heavy industrial sites in KS and MO.
&Management Training Program,Richard Chinn Environmental
* NEPA ReviewslEnvironlmenltal Assessment (EA)
: Training, Inc., 1998  
Conducted NEPA Reviews for existing and proposed communications towers and a fiber optic cable corridor, including an EA for a proposed marina at a USACE lake. Responsible for field work, contact with federal, state, and local government agencies, coordination of Cultural Resource Investigation for historical preservation clearance, and production of client 2/07 EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Honors in Environmental Studies, 1997, University of Kansas Bachelor of Science in Biology, Cellular Biology, 1992, University of Kansas CE RTI FICATI ONS 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Site Operations Training, 1999 AHERA Asbestos Inspector:
: RAGLAND, TRACIE A.deliverables.
Kansas, Missouri, 1998 Category A Certification in Radioisotopes and Radiation Safety in Research, 1997 AFFILIATIONS Society of Wetland Scientists WORK HISTORY Terracon, Environmental Scientist, 1998-present University of Kansas, Research Assistant; 1994-1998 University of Minnesota, Graduate Research Assistant, 1993-1994 Oklahoma State University, Laboratory Technician, 1992-1993 ADDITIONAL COURSES Wetland Construction and Restoration, Wetland Training Institute, 2001 Wetland Plant Identification, Biotic Consultants, Inc., 2000 Basic Processes in Hydric Soils, North Carolina State University, 2000 38-Hour Army Corns of Engineers Wetland Delineation &
* LSIs/Preliminary Assessment (PA)/Site Inspection (SI)Conducted and managed LSls including a PA/SI on a former government WWII facility.
Management Training Program, Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc., 1998
Responsibilities included preparation of work scopes, collection of soil and groundwater  
 
: samples, preparation of samples forshipment to a laboratory for analysis, interpretation of analytical  
RAGLAND, TRACIE A.
: results, and preparation of clientdeliverables.
deliverables.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Phase I ESAs* Falley's Food Stores -KS and MO (Associated Wholesale Grocers-Kansas City, KS)Coordinated research database and historical records procurement, technical report editing, scheduling and/or performing field work, and assisting with report preparation for 25 Falley's Food stores.* Pizza Hut -Southeastern US (National Pizza Company International, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)Coordinated and managed field work, technical report review and editing, and client deliverable production for 47 Pizza Hut facilities located across the southeastern US in 10 business days.*Montezuma Wind Farm -Montezuma, KS (Snyder and Associates, Inc.-Atlantic, IA)Conducted field work, including a low-altitude aerial reconnaissance, and report preparation for a proposedwindmill energy generating facility located on 8,000 acres of farmland in western KS.* Industrial Warehouses  
* LSIs/Preliminary Assessment (PA)/Site Inspection (SI)
-Kansas City, MO and KS (Block Income Fund I, L.P.-Kansas City, MO)A portfolio of 5 industrial warehouses containing multiple tenants totaling 390,000sf.
Conducted and managed LSls including a PA/SI on a former government WWII facility. Responsibilities included preparation of work scopes, collection of soil and groundwater samples, preparation of samples for shipment to a laboratory for analysis, interpretation of analytical results, and preparation of client deliverables.
* Martin Tractor Company -Topeka, KS (Martin Tractor Company-Topeka, KS) ... A large-scale truck maintenance/service and parts testing and rebuilding  
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Phase I ESAs
: facility, totaling 1~66,00sf,.
* Falley's Food Stores - KS and MO (Associated Wholesale Grocers-Kansas City, KS)
Withnumerous aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), an oil burner, mud trap, paint room, former undergr.ound storage tanks (USTs), and multiple waste streams..
Coordinated research database and historical records procurement, technical report editing, scheduling and/or performing field work, and assisting with report preparation for 25 Falley's Food stores.
* Plastic Packaging Technologies  
* Pizza Hut - Southeastern US (National Pizza Company International, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)
-Kansas City, KS (Stonehenge  
Coordinated and managed field work, technical report review and editing, and client deliverable production for 47 Pizza Hut facilities located across the southeastern US in 10 business days.
: Partners, Inc.-Columbus, OH)-..A 65,000sf facility associated with the production,  
*Montezuma Wind Farm - Montezuma, KS (Snyder and Associates, Inc.-Atlantic, IA)
: printing, and distribution of roll stack packaging and plasticbags, with flexigraphic wide-web  
Conducted field work, including a low-altitude aerial reconnaissance, and report preparation for a proposed windmill energy generating facility located on 8,000 acres of farmland in western KS.
: printing, solvent-less lamination operations, and a volatile organiccompound emissions burner.*Mize Road -Lenexa, KS (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)Proposed expansion and improvement of 1.5 to 2 miles of Mize Road and West 79th Street in Lenexa, KS.*Sovereign Business Forms -Girard, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)An 80,000sf facility associated with the printing, packaging, warehousing, and distribution of custombusiness forms, including the production of metal photo plates from film and negatives.
* Industrial Warehouses - Kansas City, MO and KS (Block Income Fund I, L.P.-Kansas City, MO)
*White Lakes Center- Topeka, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL) ..A retail facility consisting of a 414,582sf mall, an 8,141sf former Penny's Automotive Service Center, a2,750sf Burger King restaurant, and associated parking and drives.*Plant Property  
A portfolio of 5 industrial warehouses containing multiple tenants totaling 390,000sf.
-St. Joseph, MO (Premium Pork, LLC-Lenexa, KS)A 60-acre tract consisting of a chemical storage warehouse (former meat packing facility);
* Martin Tractor Company - Topeka, KS (Martin Tractor Company-Topeka, KS)
palletmanufacturing company; truck maintenance facility and empty dumpster storage; vacant grass-covered land; farmland; and dilapidated hog pens.*Farmers Coop Sites -KS (Farmers Cooperative Association-Lawrence, KS)7 Farmers Coop facilities in northeast KS which included:
A large-scale truck maintenance/service and parts testing and rebuilding facility, totaling 1~66,00sf,. With numerous aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), an oil burner, mud trap, paint room, former undergr.ound storage tanks (USTs), and multiple waste streams..
liquid/dry fertilizer plants, grain storage elevators, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities,  
* Plastic Packaging Technologies - Kansas City, KS (Stonehenge Partners, Inc.-Columbus, OH)-..
: offices, tire shops, feed mills, storage yards, bulk fuel storage ASTfacilities, a retail store, and filling station.2 2/07  
A 65,000sf facility associated with the production, printing, and distribution of roll stack packaging and plastic bags, with flexigraphic wide-web printing, solvent-less lamination operations, and a volatile organic compound emissions burner.
: RAGLAND, TRACIE A.* Agricultural Chemical Facilities  
*Mize Road - Lenexa, KS (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)
-KS and MO (United Agri Products-Greeley, CO)15 agricultural chemical blending facilities in north central KS and northwest MO which included liquid/dry fertilizer plants, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities,  
Proposed expansion and improvement of 1.5 to 2 miles of Mize Road and West 7 9 th Street in Lenexa, KS.
: offices, and maintenance shops.* Proposed County Buildings  
*Sovereign Business Forms - Girard, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)
-Olathe, KS (Johnson County, KS-Olathe, KS)5 city blocks in downtown Olathe, KS including parking areas and multiple commercial, government, andresidential structures with extensive historical background.
An 80,000sf facility associated with the printing, packaging, warehousing, and distribution of custom business forms, including the production of metal photo plates from film and negatives.
Brownfields Revitalization Act Phase I ESAs* Former St. Joseph Power & Light Company -St. Joseph, MO (Heartland Foundation-St.
*White Lakes Center-Topeka, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL).
Joseph, MO)40,000sf general commodities warehouse facility.
A retail facility consisting of a 414,582sf mall, an 8,141sf former Penny's Automotive Service Center, a 2,750sf Burger King restaurant, and associated parking and drives.
* Former Junction City Foundry Property  
*Plant Property - St. Joseph, MO (Premium Pork, LLC-Lenexa, KS)
-Junction City, KS (Kansas Department of Health andEnvironment-Topeka, KS)41 acres consisting of a 106,000sf former electric heavy iron foundry structure, a vacant 1-story officebuilding, an abandoned 2-story farmhouse, and outbuildings.
A 60-acre tract consisting of a chemical storage warehouse (former meat packing facility); pallet manufacturing company; truck maintenance facility and empty dumpster storage; vacant grass-covered land; farmland; and dilapidated hog pens.
* EBA Building  
*Farmers Coop Sites - KS (Farmers Cooperative Association-Lawrence, KS) 7 Farmers Coop facilities in northeast KS which included: liquid/dry fertilizer plants, grain storage elevators, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, tire shops, feed mills, storage yards, bulk fuel storage AST facilities, a retail store, and filling station.
-Topeka, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS)2 acres consisting of a 60,000sf three-story medical office building and parking area.* 312 South Second Street- Atchison, KS (City of Atchison-Atchison, KS)1.2-acre metals and plastics salvage yard.* Former Frisco Laboratory Building  
2 2/07
-Springfield, MO (City of Springfield-Springfield, MO)15,000sf former railroad laboratory testing facility.
 
RAGLAND, TRACIE A.
* Agricultural Chemical Facilities - KS and MO (United Agri Products-Greeley, CO) 15 agricultural chemical blending facilities in north central KS and northwest MO which included liquid/dry fertilizer plants, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, and maintenance shops.
* Proposed County Buildings - Olathe, KS (Johnson County, KS-Olathe, KS) 5 city blocks in downtown Olathe, KS including parking areas and multiple commercial, government, and residential structures with extensive historical background.
Brownfields Revitalization Act Phase I ESAs
* Former St. Joseph Power & Light Company - St. Joseph, MO (Heartland Foundation-St. Joseph, MO) 40,000sf general commodities warehouse facility.
* Former Junction City Foundry Property - Junction City, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 41 acres consisting of a 106,000sf former electric heavy iron foundry structure, a vacant 1-story office building, an abandoned 2-story farmhouse, and outbuildings.
* EBA Building - Topeka, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 2 acres consisting of a 60,000sf three-story medical office building and parking area.
* 312 South Second Street-Atchison, KS (City of Atchison-Atchison, KS) 1.2-acre metals and plastics salvage yard.
* Former Frisco Laboratory Building - Springfield, MO (City of Springfield-Springfield, MO) 15,000sf former railroad laboratory testing facility.
Limited Site Investigations/PNlSl
Limited Site Investigations/PNlSl
* Hardesty Federal Complex -Kansas City, MO (US General Services Administration-Kansas City, MO)Conducted PA and SI under the Comprehensive Environmental  
* Hardesty Federal Complex - Kansas City, MO (US General Services Administration-Kansas City, MO)
: Response, Compensation, and Liability Actof 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), including soiland groundwater analyses and lead sampling, at 7 structures on 18 acres, including a former clothingchemical pretreatment facility and indoor firing range. PA/SI reports reviewed and approved by the MissouriDepartment of Natural Resources.
Conducted PA and SI under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), including soil and groundwater analyses and lead sampling, at 7 structures on 18 acres, including a former clothing chemical pretreatment facility and indoor firing range. PA/SI reports reviewed and approved by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources.
* USA Detergents  
* USA Detergents - Harrisonville, MO (Pinnacle Capital Group-Philadelphia, PA)
-Harrisonville, MO (Pinnacle Capital Group-Philadelphia, PA)Conducted groundwater and soil sampling near an abandoned UST. Conducted outfall sampling to establish baseline analytical data for use in the application of a wastewater/storm water discharge permit.*Commercial Retail Redevelopment  
Conducted groundwater and soil sampling near an abandoned UST. Conducted outfall sampling to establish baseline analytical data for use in the application of a wastewater/storm water discharge permit.
-Overland Park, KS (Continental Consulting Engineers, Inc.-Leawood, KS)Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from surrounding former dry-cleaning and printing/photography facilities.
*Commercial Retail Redevelopment - Overland Park, KS (Continental Consulting Engineers, Inc.-
*Night Club and Office Space -Kansas City, MO (MC Real Estate Services, Inc.-Kansas City, MO)Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite gasoline tanks and surrounding former dry-cleaning, spray painting/auto repair, and filling station facilities.
Leawood, KS)
*Proposed Aldi -Lee's Summit, MO (Aldi, lnc.-Olathe, KS)Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite towing/maintenance activities.
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from surrounding former dry-cleaning and printing/photography facilities.
*Night Club and Office Space - Kansas City, MO (MC Real Estate Services, Inc.-Kansas City, MO)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite gasoline tanks and surrounding former dry-cleaning, spray painting/auto repair, and filling station facilities.
*Proposed Aldi - Lee's Summit, MO (Aldi, lnc.-Olathe, KS)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite towing/maintenance activities.
2/07
2/07
* MEILS~OENWM/-2 015-RAI-0O01 Rev. 0Appendix I -NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment I-i  
 
.,:NWMIS....:NOArhWEST MED CAL =SOTOPESReport Cover SheetReport No: NWMI-2015-RPT-002 Revision No: 0Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI Radioisotope Production FacilityReport Title:Project Title:Status: III In Process [] FinalContains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?
* ;=e.NWM**
D]Yes []NoApprovals Review (R) andApproval (A) Printed Name Signature DateOriginator A J. Belier 10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass Ct 10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)  
MEILS~OE NWM/-2 015-RAI-0O01 Rev. 0 Appendix I -
[] N/ARevision HistoryRev Date Revision Description Affected Pages0 10/1/2015 Initial Issue All*1-This page intentionally left blank.
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment I-i
* O 0*e* e OO0O0 oS.
 
* 0 *NWM INORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPESNorthwest Medical Isotopes, LLCRadioisotope Production FacilityVegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0October 2015Prepared by:Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256Corvallis, OR 97330 This page intentionally left blank.  
.,:NWMI S....:NOArhWEST MED CAL =SOTOPES Report Cover Sheet Report No:
;..., NWMI* oe'-* : e= " " NORTllWESTMEI)ICALI$OTOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLCRadioisotope Production FacilityVegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0Date Published:
NWMI-2015-RPT-002 Revision No:
October 1, 2015Title: Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature:
0 Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility Report
:!;'. ;!NWMIN oo "EORThWESTMAED CA SOIpESNWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.  
 
*,, ,.NERTAWESTMEDIICAL SOTUPESNWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment CONTENTS
==Title:==
Project
 
==Title:==
Status:
III In Process
[] Final Contains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?
D]Yes
[]No Approvals Review (R) and Approval (A)
Printed Name Signature Date Originator A
J. Belier y*
10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass Ct A4*p'~-"
10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)
[] N/A Revision History Rev Date Revision Description Affected Pages 0
10/1/2015 Initial Issue All
*1-
 
This page intentionally left blank.
 
O 0*e
* e OO0O0 o S.
* 0
* NWM I NORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPES Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 October 2015 Prepared by:
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC 815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256 Corvallis, OR 97330
 
This page intentionally left blank.
 
.:.*. ;..., NWMI
* =e*
oe'-
* : e= " " NORTllWESTMEI)ICALI$OTOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 Date Published:
October 1, 2015
 
==Title:==
Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature:  
*'J
:!;'. ;!NWMI N
oo "EORThWESTMAED CA SOIpES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
 
*,,,.NERTAWESTMEDIICAL SOTUPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment CONTENTS


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology..............................................................................
*.......... 1 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT........................................................................ 2 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 4
==4.0 ASSESSMENT==
CONCLUSION........................................................................... 5


........................................................................................
==5.0 REFERENCES==
11.1 Background
.............................................................................................. 6 APPENDICES Appendix A -
..........................................................................................
Appendix B -
11.2 Methodology
Appendix C -
..............................................................................
Appendix D -
12.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT
Table 1.
........................................................................
Table 2.
23.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT..........................................................................
Transect Map................................................................................... A-i Quadrate Photographs.......................................................................... B-i Plant Photographs.............................................................................. C-i Qualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map................................... D-i TABLES Frequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site................... 2 Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site............ 3
44.0 ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION...........................................................................  


==55.0 REFERENCES==
;@.Y.NW IV!
*;.o;.NURThWESTMED CALIOOE NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment TERMS Acronyms 99Mo Discovery Ridge EPA GPS LEU NWMI RPF U.S.
molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research Park Environmental Protection Agency geographic positioning system low-enriched uranium Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC radioisotope production facility United States Units ha kin m
2 in hectare kilometer meter square meter ii


..............................................................................................
. NW
6APPENDICES Appendix A -Appendix B -Appendix C -Appendix D -Table 1.Table 2.Transect Map ...................................................................................
,t,,*.NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 N'oAL Iea,:
A-iQuadrate Photographs..........................................................................
RPF Vegetation Assessment
B-iPlant Photographs
..............................................................................
C-iQualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map ...................................
D-iTABLESFrequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site...................
2Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site ............
3
;@.Y.NW IV!*;.o;.NURThWESTMED CALIOOENWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment TERMSAcronyms99MoDiscovery RidgeEPAGPSLEUNWMIRPFU.S.molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research ParkEnvironmental Protection Agencygeographic positioning systemlow-enriched uraniumNorthwest Medical Isotopes, LLCradioisotope production facilityUnited StatesUnitshakinm2inhectarekilometer metersquare meterii
.NW Rev. 0N'oAL Iea,: RPF Vegetation Assessment


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
This assessment consists of quantitative and qualitative vegetation surveys that were conducted to evaluate the current state of vegetation on the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)
Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. A quantitative vegetation assessment was conducted near the end of the growing season that collected frequency and density data.
This report describes the findings from the quantitative and qualitative assessments conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessments is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.


This assessment consists of quantitative and qualitative vegetation surveys that were conducted toevaluate the current state of vegetation on the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. A quantitative vegetation assessment was conducted nearthe end of the growing season that collected frequency and density data.This report describes the findings from the quantitative and qualitative assessments conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessments is used to describethe current vegetation conditions of the site.1.1 BACKGROUND NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum 99 (99Mo) usinglow-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery RidgeResearch Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, BooneCounty, Missouri.
==1.1 BACKGROUND==
The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east ofKansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north ofU.S. Highway 63.The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for theresearch and monitoring of ecosystems.
NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum 99 (99Mo) using low-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery Ridge Research Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east of Kansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north of U.S. Highway 63.
Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systemsthat have similar vegetation,  
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for the research and monitoring of ecosystems. Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systems that have similar vegetation, climate, geology, and physiology. The RFP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located on gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region was mostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). After European settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gently rolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh and Schroeder, 2002).
: climate, geology, and physiology.
The proposed site is located in a developed industrial park that was historically used as cultivated cropland and pasture. The current vegetation at the site consists of mostly grasses reminiscent of open pastureland.
The RFP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located on gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region wasmostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). AfterEuropean settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gentlyrolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh andSchroeder, 2002).The proposed site is located in a developed industrial park that was historically used as cultivated croplandand pasture.
This report provides a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the vegetation currently on the site.
The current vegetation at the site consists of mostly grasses reminiscent of open pastureland.
1.2 METHODOLOGY The quantitative assessment was performed with two randomly selected transects within the RPF site.
This report provides a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the vegetation currently on the site.1.2 METHODOLOGY The quantitative assessment was performed with two randomly selected transects within the RPF site.At each location, general areas were identified for transects.
At each location, general areas were identified for transects. The exact transect starting location was then selected randomly by tossing a stake in the air. Each transect ending location was selected randomly by tossing a stake in the air and walking in the direction that the stake landed. Transect lengths were 50 meter (in). Transect ends were recorded with a Trimnble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS).
The exact transect starting location was thenselected randomly by tossing a stake in the air. Each transect ending location was selected randomly bytossing a stake in the air and walking in the direction that the stake landed. Transect lengths were50 meter (in). Transect ends were recorded with a Trimnble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS).A map of the transect locations is included in Appendix A.After transects were defined, sample plots were established at 5 m intervals along each transect.
A map of the transect locations is included in Appendix A.
Sampleplots were established with a 1 square meter (in2) (0.5 m x 2 m) plot frame quadrat.
After transects were defined, sample plots were established at 5 m intervals along each transect. Sample plots were established with a 1 square meter (in 2) (0.5 m x 2 m) plot frame quadrat. To ensure that sample points wcrc sampled randomly, the starting point was chosen between 0 and 5 m, and then a random number between 0 and 20 was used to determine the meters to be taken perpendicular (alternating direction every 5 m) to the transect. Photographs of each quadrat are provided in Appendix B. Within each quadrat, data was collected for density and frequency.
To ensure thatsample points wcrc sampled randomly, the starting point was chosen between 0 and 5 m, and then arandom number between 0 and 20 was used to determine the meters to be taken perpendicular (alternating direction every 5 m) to the transect.
The qualitative assessment was performed in conjunction with the quantitative assessment. The qualitative assessment involved identifying significant vegetation not specifically found in the plots. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in random transects across the property.
Photographs of each quadrat are provided in Appendix B. Withineach quadrat, data was collected for density and frequency.
1
The qualitative assessment was performed in conjunction with the quantitative assessment.
 
Thequalitative assessment involved identifying significant vegetation not specifically found in the plots. Thequalitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and inrandom transects across the property.
NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT Each transect was located using the method described in Section 1.0. Transect 1 was located on the southern portion and crossed the property from the east to the west. Transect 2 was located on the northern portion and crossed the property from the east to the north, diagonal from the Transect 1.
1 NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT Each transect was located using the method described in Section 1.0. Transect 1 was located on thesouthern portion and crossed the property from the east to the west. Transect 2 was located on thenorthern portion and crossed the property from the east to the north, diagonal from the Transect 1.Plant species encountered during the quantitative assessment consisted mostly of non-native plantstypically found in disturbed areas such as pastures and right-of-ways (MDOC, 2015). Photographs ofencountered species during the quantitative and qualitative assessments are provided in Appendix C.Encountered species that are not classified as non-native (White Heath Aster and Goldenrod) arecommonly found throughout prairie/oak forest plant communities (MDOC, 2015).Table 1 describes encountered species with frequencies of all of the species found on the site. Plantfrequency is the percent of occurrence within each transect and represents the species for the entire site.Table 1. Frequency of Plant Species on theRadioisotope Production Facility SiteIndian GrassCrown VetchHorse NettleWhite CloverTall FescueBull ThistleSorghastrum nutansSecuriger variaSolanum carolinense Trifolium repensColium arundinaceum Cirsium vulgateNon-native Non-native Non-native No-atvNon-native Non-native 1007060503010100501040Species with the highest density on the property consist of Indian Grass (Sorghastrum nutans) and YellowFoxtail (Setaria pumila) (Table 2). The species density is the number of plants/in 2.Table 2 describes thespecies densities on the property.
Plant species encountered during the quantitative assessment consisted mostly of non-native plants typically found in disturbed areas such as pastures and right-of-ways (MDOC, 2015). Photographs of encountered species during the quantitative and qualitative assessments are provided in Appendix C.
No Federal-or State-listed species were encountered during thequantitative assessment.
Encountered species that are not classified as non-native (White Heath Aster and Goldenrod) are commonly found throughout prairie/oak forest plant communities (MDOC, 2015).
2  
Table 1 describes encountered species with frequencies of all of the species found on the site. Plant frequency is the percent of occurrence within each transect and represents the species for the entire site.
*: eOOt.:.-..; WMI* ". eo
Table 1. Frequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site Indian Grass Crown Vetch Horse Nettle White Clover Tall Fescue Bull Thistle Sorghastrum nutans Securiger varia Solanum carolinense Trifolium repens Colium arundinaceum Cirsium vulgate Non-native Non-native Non-native No-atv Non-native Non-native 100 70 60 50 30 10 100 50 10 40 Species with the highest density on the property consist of Indian Grass (Sorghastrum nutans) and Yellow Foxtail (Setaria pumila) (Table 2). The species density is the number of plants/in2. Table 2 describes the species densities on the property. No Federal-or State-listed species were encountered during the quantitative assessment.
* NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Table 2. Species Density of Plant Species on theRadioisotope Production Facility SiteBull ThistleField CressHorse NettleIndian GrassWhite CloverYellow FoxtailCirsium vulgareLepidium campestre Solanum carolinense Sorghastrum nutansTrifolium repensSetaria pumilaNon-native 0.3Non-native 1.4Non-native 1.6Non-native 113INon-native 1.1Non-native 9.60.70.71165.93.83 I 11 NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0?...¶EU w EilRPF Vegetation Assessment 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT Observations at the NWMI RPF site occurred on September 30 and October 1, 2015. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in randomtransects across the property.
2
Photographs of the property were taken at various locations and areincluded in Appendix D, along with a map of the photographed locations.
 
Photographs of notable plantsspecies taken throughout the assessment are provided in Appendix C.During the qualitative assessment, no Federal-or State-listed species were encountered.
eOOt
An AmericanSycamore (Platanus occidentalis) was encountered on the east side of the property.
.:.-..; WMI
This tree species iscommonly found through the state of Missouri and in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).Other species encountered during the qualitative assessment and not the quantitative assessment includeCow Parsnip (Heracleaum lanatum),
* ". eo
Partridge Pea (Cassia chamaecrista),
* I*K3111WIE:*IIBICt&BOlI*PI*
and English Plantain (Plantago Lanceolata).
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Table 2. Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site Bull Thistle Field Cress Horse Nettle Indian Grass White Clover Yellow Foxtail Cirsium vulgare Lepidium campestre Solanum carolinense Sorghastrum nutans Trifolium repens Setaria pumila Non-native 0.3 Non-native 1.4 Non-native 1.6 Non-native 113 I
Both of these species are common in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).While conducting the qualitative assessment, the inspector did encounter approximately nine EurasianCollared-Doves (Streptopelia decaocto).
Non-native 1.1 Non-native 9.6 0.7 0.7 116 5.9 3.8 3
These birds are common and found statewide, typically usingpastures, trees, or powerlines to roost. No other wildlife were encountered onsite during the qualitative orquantitative assessment.
 
4  
*.:,*t;' *.
!..~;:;i Ni~ aImu NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 01 D1ifif iI RPF Vegetation Assessment 4.0 ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION The results of the quantitative or qualitative assessment did not identify any Federal-or State-listed species and/or species of concern.
I 11 NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0
Based on observations onsite and of the surrounding areas, thevegetation found onsite is not unique to this location, and these species are commonly found on othersites throughout the region that have been used as cattle pasture.5  
?...¶EU w EilRPF Vegetation Assessment 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT Observations at the NWMI RPF site occurred on September 30 and October 1, 2015. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in random transects across the property. Photographs of the property were taken at various locations and are included in Appendix D, along with a map of the photographed locations. Photographs of notable plants species taken throughout the assessment are provided in Appendix C.
.*'*. NW M~K I NWM.-2o15-RPx-0o2, Rev. 0* EV o." *l RPF Vegetation Assessment
During the qualitative assessment, no Federal-or State-listed species were encountered. An American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) was encountered on the east side of the property. This tree species is commonly found through the state of Missouri and in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).
Other species encountered during the qualitative assessment and not the quantitative assessment include Cow Parsnip (Heracleaum lanatum), Partridge Pea (Cassia chamaecrista), and English Plantain (Plantago Lanceolata). Both of these species are common in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).
While conducting the qualitative assessment, the inspector did encounter approximately nine Eurasian Collared-Doves (Streptopelia decaocto). These birds are common and found statewide, typically using pastures, trees, or powerlines to roost. No other wildlife were encountered onsite during the qualitative or quantitative assessment.
4
 
!..~;:;i Ni~ aImu NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0
.*;: 1 D1ifif iI RPF Vegetation Assessment
 
==4.0 ASSESSMENT==
CONCLUSION The results of the quantitative or qualitative assessment did not identify any Federal-or State-listed species and/or species of concern. Based on observations onsite and of the surrounding areas, the vegetation found onsite is not unique to this location, and these species are commonly found on other sites throughout the region that have been used as cattle pasture.
5
 
.*'*. NW M~K I
NWM.-2o15-RPx-0o2, Rev. 0 EV o." *l RPF Vegetation Assessment


==5.0 REFERENCES==
==5.0 REFERENCES==
: Chapman, S. S., Omemik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002,"Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, andphotographs):
Chapman, S. S., Omemik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002, "Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia," U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000), 2002.
Reston, Virginia,"
MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.
U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000),
Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.
2002.MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department ofConservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.6  
6
.;,','.:MI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix ATransect MapA-i NWMI.'e oo',NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.A-ii  
 
:NWNMINWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Loca~on Map..-Vqetation Assesment TinhectIRPF FidlityProperty Boundary,/X, FenceFigure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Transect MapA-1  
.;,','.:MI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix A Transect Map A-i
;NWMIJ~NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.A-2  
 
: NWMI* eo oe'.: .%e?;,; *;.e.,. : ImmVCr.St" NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)A-3  
="* NWMI
;""; NWMI* =0 Qe*.: %oo;:;o o; IIItlDgCAL R$NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-6. Northwest PondA-4 I/IINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix BQuadrate Photographs B-i i;NWAMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURESFigure B-i1.Figure B-2.Figure B-3.Figure B-4.Figure B-5.Figure B-6.Figure B-7.Figure B-8.Figure B-9.Figure B-b1.Figure B-ti1.Figure B- 12.Figure B- 13.Figure B- 14.Figure B-i15.Figure B- 16.Figure B- 17.Figure B- 18.Figure B- 19.Figure B-20.Figure B-21.Figure B-22.Figure B-23.Figure B-24.Transect 1 Looking West......................................................................
.'e oo',
B-iTransect 1 Quadrat 1 ...........................................................................
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
B-iTransect 1 Quadrat 2...........................................................................
A-ii
B-iTransect i Quadrat 3 ...........................................................................
:NWNMI NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Loca~on Map
B-iTransect i Quadrat 4...........................................................................
..-
B-2Transect 1 Quadrat S ...........................................................................
* Vqetation Assesment TinhectI RPF Fidlity Property Boundary
B-2Transect i Quadrat 6...........................................................................
,/X, Fence Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Transect Map A-1
B-2Transect i Quadrat 7...........................................................................
 
B-2Transect 1 Quadrat 8...........................................................................
;NWMIJ~
B-3Transect i Quadrat 9...........................................................................
NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
B-3Transect i Quadrat 10..........................................................................
A-2
B-3Transect 1 Looking East.......................................................................
: NWMI
B-3Transect 2 Looking Northeast.................................................................
* eo oe'.
B-4Transect 2 Quadrat 1 ...........................................................................
:.%e?;,; *
B-4Transect 2 Quadrat 2 ...........................................................................
;.e.,. :
B-4Transect 2 Quadrat 3 ...........................................................................
ImmVCr.St" Iml*u.
B-4Transect 2 Quadrat 4...........................................................................
* NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)
B-5Transect 2 Quadrat 5 ...........................................................................
Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)
B-5Transect 2 Quadrat 6 ...........................................................................
A-3
B-STransect 2 Quadrat 7 ...........................................................................
 
B-5Transect 2 Quadrat 8 ...........................................................................
;""; NWMI
B-6Transect 2 Quadrat 9 ...........................................................................
* =0 Qe*.
B-6Transect 2 Quadrat 10..........................................................................
: %oo;:
B-6Transect 2 Looking Southwest................................................................
;o o;
B-6B-ii  
P*DIN134VtlEs'r IIItlDgCAL R$
*: ..,..NWM INWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-i. Transect 1 Looking WestFigure B.-2. Transect 1 Quadrat 1Figure B-3. Transect 1 Quadrat 2Figure B-4. Transect 1 Quadrat 3B-i  
NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-6. Northwest Pond A-4
~;NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-5. Transect 1 Quadrat 4Figure B-6. Transect 1 Quadrat 5Figure B-7. Transect 1 Quadrat 6Figure B-8. Transect 1 Quadrat 7B-2 NWM INWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-9. Transect 1 Quadrat 8Figure B-10. Transect 1 Quadrat 9Figure B-11. Transect 1 Quadrat 10Figure B-12. Transect 1 Looking EastB-3 NW !YVMINWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-13. Transect 2 Looking Northeast Figure B-14. Transect 2 Quadrat 1Figure B-15. Transect 2 Quadrat 2Figure B-16. Transect 2 Quadrat 3B-4  
 
:....:.:
.!:*=:;. I*IYL I/II NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix B Quadrate Photographs B-i
NWMI* o0 gO'*NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-17. Transect 2 Quadrat 4Figure B-18. Transect 2 Quadrat 5Figure B-19.Transect 2 Quadrat 6Figure B-20.Transect 2 Quadrat 7B-5  
 
:": NWMI.'o@ @O'.* %002; :" -"
i;NWAMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURES Figure B-i1.
ISOTOItIES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-21.Transect 2 Quadrat 8Figure B-22.Transect 2 Quadrat 9Figure B-23. Transect 2 Quadrat 10Figure B-24. Transect 2 Looking Southwest B-6 i.JYYJ°ANWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix CPlant Photographs C-i  
Figure B-2.
..IUlMAR IOe'...,,... 11 VV IVll.::e,.:. amamMUT NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURESFigure C-i1.Figure C-2.Figure C-3.Figure C-4.Figure C-5.Figure C-6.Figure C-7.Figure C-8.Figure C-9.Figure C- 10.Figure C-il.Figure C- 12.Figure C- 13.Indian Grass ....................................................................................
Figure B-3.
C-i1Yellow Foxtail..................................................................................
Figure B-4.
C-i1Goldenrod.......................................................................................
Figure B-5.
C-2White Heath Aster .............................................................................
Figure B-6.
C-2Partridge Pea....................................................................................
Figure B-7.
C-2English Plantain  
Figure B-8.
................................................................................
Figure B-9.
C-2Horseweed......................................................................................
Figure B-b1.
C-3Horse Nettle ....................................................................................
Figure B-ti1.
C-3Field Cress......................................................................................
Figure B-12.
C-3White Clover....................................................................................
Figure B-13.
C-3Bull Thistle .....................................................................................
Figure B-14.
C-4American Sycamore............................................................................
Figure B-i15.
C-4Cow Parsnip...............................................................
Figure B-16.
i.....................
Figure B-17.
C-5C-ii  
Figure B-18.
~. NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i. Indian GrassFigure C-2. Yellow FoxtailC-1 NWMIVNWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-3. Goldenrod Figure C-4. White Heath AsterFigure C-5. Partridge PeaFigure C-6. English PlantainC-2  
Figure B-19.
... NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-7. Horseweed Figure C-8. Horse NettleFigure C-9. Field CressFigure C-10. White CloverC-3 NWI~AJNWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i1. Bull ThistleFigure C-12. American SycamoreC-4  
Figure B-20.
* ..,..N MIVINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-13. Cow ParsnipC-5 NWMI*.NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.C-6  
Figure B-21.
-NVV- mm~ ~C~ NWM1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix DQualitative Assessment Photographs and Location MapD-i NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure D-1.Figure D-2.Figure D-3.Figure D-4.Figure D-5.Figure D-6.Figure D-7.Figure D-8.Figure D-9.Figure D- 10.FIGURESRadioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed..  
Figure B-22.
.................
Figure B-23.
D- 1Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site.........................................
Figure B-24.
D-2Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site...................................
Transect 1 Looking West...................................................................... B-i Transect 1 Quadrat 1........................................................................... B-i Transect 1 Quadrat 2........................................................................... B-i Transect i Quadrat 3........................................................................... B-i Transect i Quadrat 4........................................................................... B-2 Transect 1 Quadrat S........................................................................... B-2 Transect i Quadrat 6........................................................................... B-2 Transect i Quadrat 7........................................................................... B-2 Transect 1 Quadrat 8........................................................................... B-3 Transect i Quadrat 9........................................................................... B-3 Transect i Quadrat 10.......................................................................... B-3 Transect 1 Looking East....................................................................... B-3 Transect 2 Looking Northeast................................................................. B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 1........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 2........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 3........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 4........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 5........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 6........................................................................... B-S Transect 2 Quadrat 7........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 8........................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Quadrat 9........................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Quadrat 10.......................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Looking Southwest................................................................ B-6 B-ii
D-2Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site .....................................
 
D-3Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site......................................
..,..NWM I NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-i. Transect 1 Looking West Figure B.-2. Transect 1 Quadrat 1 Figure B-3. Transect 1 Quadrat 2 Figure B-4. Transect 1 Quadrat 3 B-i
D-3Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site .............................................
 
D-4Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site................................................
~;NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-5. Transect 1 Quadrat 4 Figure B-6. Transect 1 Quadrat 5 Figure B-7. Transect 1 Quadrat 6 Figure B-8. Transect 1 Quadrat 7 B-2
D-4Facing Southwest from Center of Site..................................................
 
D-5Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site ...............................................
NWM I NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-9. Transect 1 Quadrat 8 Figure B-10. Transect 1 Quadrat 9 Figure B-11. Transect 1 Quadrat 10 Figure B-12. Transect 1 Looking East B-3
D-5Facing South from West Border of Site. ..............................................
 
D-6D-ii  
NW  
+....NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment
!YVMI NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-13. Transect 2 Looking Northeast Figure B-14. Transect 2 Quadrat 1 Figure B-15. Transect 2 Quadrat 2 Figure B-16. Transect 2 Quadrat 3 B-4
() Vqettin Aisornarnot Photopoints 3FF FacilityPr+i ,operty Bounda,,y Fence,,o+Figure D-1. Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations SurveyedD-1 C YMINWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessmentrnin gure u-I.Figure D-2. Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of SiteFigure D-3. Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of SiteD-2  
:....:.: NWMI
.°%%.* I.'oQ Oe'.: .=;== ?:-., *-. e,,.:
* o0 gO'*
NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment in rigure u-t.Figure D-4. Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of SiteFigure D-5. Facing Southwest from Near North Border on SiteD-3  
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-17. Transect 2 Quadrat 4 Figure B-18.
:""NWMIINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment ft) IllII lt /IFigure D-6. Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of SiteFigure D-7. Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site0-4 NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment mn rigure Li-I.Figure D-8. Facing Southwest from Center of Site#8 in Figure D-1.Figure D-9. Facing Southwest from South-Center of SiteD-5  
Transect 2 Quadrat 5 Figure B-19.
:'-,,.. NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Y In ri gu~e Lu-I.Figure D-10. Facing South from West Border of SiteD-6 K EU in Nin mu** * *U*S*u**SE**
Transect 2 Quadrat 6 Figure B-20.
... *u5*TEESN REDWEET MED Al.NWMI-201 5-RAI-001 Rev. 0Appendix J -NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment J-i  
Transect 2 Quadrat 7 B-5
."=. NWMIP. -E~e.:o h O IWES7 MEDICAL SO'IEPESReport Cover SheetReport No: NWMI-2015-RPT-001 Revision No: 0Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Report Title:Project Title:NWMI Radioisotope Production FacilityStatus: LI In Process [] FinalContains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?
:": NWMI
Ll Yes []NoApprovals Review (R) andApproval (A) Printed Name Signature DateOriginator A J. Belier yj.i 10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)  
.'o@  
[] N/ARevision HistoryRev Date Revision Description Affected Pages0 10/1/2015 Initial Issue All This page intentionally left blank.
@O'.
0 O 0.*.O o eO.o.@ o O OS* 0*NWMINORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPESNorthwest Medical Isotopes, LLCRadioisotope Production FacilitySurrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0October 2015Prepared by:Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256Corvallis, OR 97330 This page intentionally left blank.
* %002; :
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLCRadioisotope Production FacilitySurrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0Date Published:
" -.o*. " NOIff14WI*ST IjEDIg*L ISOTOItIES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-21.
October 1, 2015Title: Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature:
Transect 2 Quadrat 8 Figure B-22.
C a z(J pJ  
Transect 2 Quadrat 9 Figure B-23. Transect 2 Quadrat 10 Figure B-24.
:":' NWMI*-SOJDPE.
Transect 2 Looking Southwest B-6
This page intentionally left blank.  
 
*!;"*.NWMINORthWEST MED CAL ISOIT pESNWMI-2015-RPT-O01, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment CONTENTS
i.JYYJ°A NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix C Plant Photographs C-i
 
.. *;-. IUlMAR I
,*eQ Oe'.
..,,... 11 VV IVll
. ::e,.:. amamMUT mnw* *som*s NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURES Figure C-i1.
Figure C-2.
Figure C-3.
Figure C-4.
Figure C-5.
Figure C-6.
Figure C-7.
Figure C-8.
Figure C-9.
Figure C-10.
Figure C-il.
Figure C-12.
Figure C-13.
Indian Grass.................................................................................... C-i1 Yellow Foxtail.................................................................................. C-i1 Goldenrod....................................................................................... C-2 White Heath Aster............................................................................. C-2 Partridge Pea.................................................................................... C-2 English Plantain................................................................................ C-2 Horseweed...................................................................................... C-3 Horse Nettle.................................................................................... C-3 Field Cress...................................................................................... C-3 White Clover.................................................................................... C-3 Bull Thistle..................................................................................... C-4 American Sycamore............................................................................ C-4 Cow Parsnip...............................................................
i..................... C-5 C-ii
 
~. NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i. Indian Grass Figure C-2. Yellow Foxtail C-1
 
NWMIV NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-3. Goldenrod Figure C-4. White Heath Aster Figure C-5. Partridge Pea Figure C-6. English Plantain C-2
 
... NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-7. Horseweed Figure C-8. Horse Nettle Figure C-9. Field Cress Figure C-10. White Clover C-3
 
NWI~AJ NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i1. Bull Thistle Figure C-12. American Sycamore C-4
 
*..,..N MIVI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-13.
Cow Parsnip C-5
 
NWMI*.
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
C-6
 
-NVV-mm~ ~C~ *MI NWM1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix D Qualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map D-i
 
NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure D-1.
Figure D-2.
Figure D-3.
Figure D-4.
Figure D-5.
Figure D-6.
Figure D-7.
Figure D-8.
Figure D-9.
Figure D-10.
FIGURES Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed................... D-1 Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site......................................... D-2 Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site................................... D-2 Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site..................................... D-3 Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site...................................... D-3 Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site............................................. D-4 Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site................................................ D-4 Facing Southwest from Center of Site.................................................. D-5 Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site............................................... D-5 Facing South from West Border of Site............................................... D-6 D-ii
 
+....NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment
()
Vqettin Aisornarnot Photopoints 3FF Facility Pr+i  
,operty Bounda,,y Fence,,o
+
Figure D-1. Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed D-1
 
C YMI NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment
*1 rnin gure u-I.
Figure D-2. Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site Figure D-3. Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site D-2
 
.°%%.*
I
.'oQ Oe'.
:.=;==  
?:-., *
-. e,,.:
mom'at*T*r.Ju.Be'mPEs NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment in rigure u-t.
Figure D-4. Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site Figure D-5. Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site D-3
:""NWMII NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment ft) IllII lt  
/I Figure D-6. Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site Figure D-7. Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site 0-4
 
NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment mn rigure Li-I.
Figure D-8. Facing Southwest from Center of Site
#8 in Figure D-1.
Figure D-9. Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site D-5
:'-,,.. NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Y In ri gu~e Lu-I.
Figure D-10. Facing South from West Border of Site D-6
 
K EU in Nin mu
*U*S*u**SE**
*u5*
TEES N REDWEET MED Al.
NWMI-201 5-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix J -
NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment J-i
 
."=. NWMI P.  
-E~e.:o h O IWES7 MEDICAL SO'IEPES Report Cover Sheet Report No:
NWMI-2015-RPT-001 Revision No:
0 Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Report
 
==Title:==
Project
 
==Title:==
NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility Status:
LI In Process
[] Final Contains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?
Ll Yes
[]No Approvals Review (R) and Approval (A)
Printed Name Signature Date Originator A
J. Belier yj.i 10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass  
*7
*10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)
[] N/A Revision History Rev Date Revision Description Affected Pages 0
10/1/2015 Initial Issue All
 
This page intentionally left blank.
 
0 O
0.*
.O o eO.o.
o O OS 0* NWMI NORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPES Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 October 2015 Prepared by:
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC 815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256 Corvallis, OR 97330
 
This page intentionally left blank.
 
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 Date Published:
October 1, 2015
 
==Title:==
Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature: C a z(J pJ
:":' NWMI
*-SOJDPE.
This page intentionally left blank.
 
*!;"*.NWMI
"*Oe=0*
NORthWEST MED CAL ISOIT pES NWMI-2015-RPT-O01, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment CONTENTS


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
...........................................................................................
........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology......................................................................................... 1 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 2
11.1 Background..........................................................................................
 
11.2 Methodology.........................................................................................
==3.0 REFERENCES==
12.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT..........................................................................  
.............................................................................................. 3 APPENDICES Appendix A -
Assessment Photographs and Location....................................................... A-i


==23.0 REFERENCES==
*;-=. "NORTIWESTMEIJ CAt SOlAPES NWMI-2015-RPT-OO01, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment TERMS Acronyms 99Mo Discovery Ridge EPA GPS LEU NWMI RPF U.S.
molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research Park Environmental Protection Agency geographic positioning system low-enriched uranium Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC radioisotope production facility United States Units ha km hectare kilometer ii


..............................................................................................
NWoNW I205RP-,.
3APPENDICES Appendix A -Assessment Photographs and Location.......................................................
ev lvii RPFSurrounding Property Assessment 0RTHtWEST MEDlICAL IS OTflPES
A-i
*;-=. "NORTIWESTMEIJ CAt SOlAPESNWMI-2015-RPT-OO01, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment TERMSAcronyms99MoDiscovery RidgeEPAGPSLEUNWMIRPFU.S.molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research ParkEnvironmental Protection Agencygeographic positioning systemlow-enriched uraniumNorthwest Medical Isotopes, LLCradioisotope production facilityUnited StatesUnitshakmhectarekilometer ii
.: NWoNW I205RP-,.
evlvii RPFSurrounding Property Assessment
*..., 0RTHtWEST MEDlICAL IS OTflPES


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
This assessment consists of a qualitative survey that was conducted to evaluate the current state of the properties immediately surrounding the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)
Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. The qualitative survey evaluated the surrounding vegetation comrrunities, wetlands, and the presence of any wildlife.
This report describes the findings from the qualitative survey conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessment is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.


This assessment consists of a qualitative survey that was conducted to evaluate the current state of theproperties immediately surrounding the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. The qualitative survey evaluated the surrounding vegetation comrrunities,
==1.1 BACKGROUND==
: wetlands, and the presence of any wildlife.
NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum-99 (99Mo) using low-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery Ridge Research Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east of Kansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north of U.S. Highway 63.
This report describes the findings from the qualitative survey conducted September 30 and October 1,2015. The information collected from the assessment is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.1.1 BACKGROUND NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum-99 (99Mo) usinglow-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery RidgeResearch Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, BooneCounty, Missouri.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for the research and monitoring of ecosystems. Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systems that have similar vegetation, climate, geology, and physiology. The REP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located onl gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region was mostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). After European settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gently rolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh and Schroeder, 2002).
The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east ofKansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north ofU.S. Highway 63.The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for theresearch and monitoring of ecosystems.
1.2 METHODOLOGY The qualitative survey was performed by an inspector walking the surrounding properties of the RPF site.
Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systemsthat have similar vegetation,  
Photographed locations were recorded with a Trimble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS). A map and photographs are included in Appendix A. Wildlife species identified are discussed in the following section.
: climate, geology, and physiology.
1
The REP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located onl gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region wasmostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). AfterEuropean settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gentlyrolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh andSchroeder, 2002).1.2 METHODOLOGY The qualitative survey was performed by an inspector walking the surrounding properties of the RPF site.Photographed locations were recorded with a Trimble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS). Amap and photographs are included in Appendix A. Wildlife species identified are discussed in thefollowing section.1 CA SUPSRPF Surrounding Property Assessment 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT An inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northeast of the property.
 
The inspector observed Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana),
CA SUPSRPF Surrounding Property Assessment 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT An inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northeast of the property. The inspector observed Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota), Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta beliji), and Northern Pintail (Anas acuta) within the northwestern pond. These species are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015).
Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota)  
The inspector walked the wooded area south of the property to Gans Creek. The wooded area consisted of American Elm (Ulmus americana), Eastern Red Cedar (Junziperus virgin iana), Post Oak (Quercus stellate), Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis), and Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovate). At the time of the survey, Gans Creek was not flowing; however, the inspector did observe Creek Chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) in small pools within the creek channel. Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans blanchardi) and Eastern Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) were also observed in this area. These species are common in oak/hickory riparian habitat (MDOC, 2015).
, Painted Turtle(Chrysemys picta beliji),
The inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northwest of the property. The inspector observed Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota), Canada Goose (Branta Canadensis), Northern Pintail (Anas acuta),.and Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buceinator). This pond was also stocked with largemouth bass, catfish, and crappie by the Missouri Department of Conservation for recreational purposes. These species are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015). The birds species also indicate that the surrounding water bodies may be used by migratory birds. Appendix A provides photographs of the areas surveyed.
and Northern Pintail (Anas acuta) within the northwestern pond. These speciesare common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015).The inspector walked the wooded area south of the property to Gans Creek. The wooded area consisted of American Elm (Ulmus americana),
2
Eastern Red Cedar (Junziperus virgin iana), Post Oak (Quercusstellate),
 
Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis)  
RPFSurrounding Property Assessment
, and Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovate). At the time of thesurvey, Gans Creek was not flowing;  
: however, the inspector did observe Creek Chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) in small pools within the creek channel.
Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans blanchardi) and Eastern Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) were also observed in this area. Thesespecies are common in oak/hickory riparian habitat (MDOC, 2015).The inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northwest of the property.
The inspector observed Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota),
Canada Goose (Branta Canadensis),
Northern Pintail(Anas acuta),.and Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buceinator).
This pond was also stocked with largemouth bass, catfish, and crappie by the Missouri Department of Conservation for recreational purposes.
Thesespecies are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015). The birds species alsoindicate that the surrounding water bodies may be used by migratory birds. Appendix A providesphotographs of the areas surveyed.
2  
: : RPFSurrounding Property Assessment


==3.0 REFERENCES==
==3.0 REFERENCES==
: Chapman, S. S., Omernik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002,"Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, andphotographs):
Chapman, S. S., Omernik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002, "Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia," U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000), 2002.
Reston, Virginia,"
MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.
U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000),
Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.
2002.MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department ofConservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.3  
3
*,. .:.NORTIEWES MEDICA ISATOPESNWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment This page intentionally left blank.4  
 
,°..NWMNWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Appendix AAssessment Photographs and LocationA-i  
.:.NORTIEWES MEDICA ISATOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
;..:; NWMI; MEDICAL SROTO PEDNWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-i1.Figure A-2.Figure A-3.Figure A-4.Figure A-5.Figure A-6.FIGURESRadioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed  
4
............
 
A-iNortheast Pond (View 1)......................................................................
,°..NWM NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Appendix A Assessment Photographs and Location A-i
A-2Northeast Pond (View 2)......................................................................
 
A-2Gans Creek (View 1)..........................................................................
;..:; NWMI
A-3Gans Creek (View 2)..........................................................................
;,..*-N0RFThWE*ST MEDICAL SROTO PED NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-i1.
A-3Northwest Pond ................................................................................
Figure A-2.
A-4A-ii l"; W IiNWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment
Figure A-3.
-I,=mlRPF Fac~ilityf BoundaryFedt~nce s+Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties SurveyedA-I NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-2. Northeast Pond (View 1)Figure A-3. Northeast Pond (View 2)A-2 i"'V N NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)A-3  
Figure A-4.
:"NWVMINWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment rIlCLUr¢ H Ill rlgulle Ix.-I.Figure A-6. Northwest PondA-4 APPENDIX FCredentials ADAM J. WHITEENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. White, a staff Environmental Scientist in Terracon's  
Figure A-5.
: Columbia, Mo.office, is responsible for conducting environmental services.
Figure A-6.
He isresponsible for the field services and development of reports for a widerange of projects performed.
FIGURES Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed............ A-i Northeast Pond (View 1)...................................................................... A-2 Northeast Pond (View 2)...................................................................... A-2 Gans Creek (View 1).......................................................................... A-3 Gans Creek (View 2).......................................................................... A-3 Northwest Pond................................................................................ A-4 A-ii
His primary environmental duties involveperformance and report development for Phase I environmental siteassessments, Phase II site assessments and remediation  
 
: projects, wetlanddelineations, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews.RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
l";
* Deer Valley Apartment,  
W Ii NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment
: Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) on a multi-family residential apartment complex for Prudential Mortgage Capital Company.* Colt Railroad,  
-I,=ml RPF Fac~ilityf Pr*I*operty Boundary Fedt~nce s
: Columbia, MissouriPerformed on-site soil sampling related to identifying petroleum andmetals contaminated soils on the site.* Beatrice Cheese, New Hampton, IowaPerformed on-site remediatory supervision and site conditions monitoring associated with the remediation of petroleum contaminated soils on thesite using subsurface injection methods.* Flat Branch Park Phase II, Columbia, MO.Conducted data review and assisted with report developmernt for EPABrownfield project associated with remediation of site impacted by formerpetroleum bulk storage facilities.  
+
.* Cell Tower Sites, Missouri and KansasPerformed Phase I ESAs and NEPA assessments as they applied to thedevelopment associated with co-located and raw land tower sites forVerizon Wireless throughout Missouri and Kansas.* Agriculture Storage Facilities, KansasPerformed on-site soil, groundwater, and surface water sampling, at 10agricultural fertilizer/pesticide facilities in Kansas.* Missouri  
Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed A-I
: Theatre, Columbia, MissouriPerformed a Phase I ESA and report development for the renovation ofthe historic Missouri Theatre building.
 
The site is located in downtownColumbia and was the former location of a drycleaner and printing facility.
*:*NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-2. Northeast Pond (View 1)
* Underground Storage Tank Removal,  
Figure A-3. Northeast Pond (View 2)
: Moberly, MissouriProvided oversight, documentation, and sampling of contaminated soilsduring the excavation,  
A-2
: removal, and closure of an underground petroleum storage tank.* Hy-Vee, Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase I ESA and on-site soil and groundwater sampling forproposed Hy-Vee grocery stores and gas station.* Agricultural Storage Facility,  
 
: Trenton, MissouriConducted Phase I ESA and Missouri Department of Natural Resources EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Agricultural System Management, Minor SoilScience, 2005, University ofMissouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS  
i"'V N MI*;.
*OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPERWetland Delineation Red Cross First AidWORK HISTORYTerracon, Environmental Scientist, 2006-present; University of Missouri-Columbia, Soil Characterization Lab, 200606/05 White, Adam J. 2(MDNR) file review for the historic agricultural chemical facility.
NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)
*Hinton Little General Stores -Hinton, MissouriConducted site characterization and risk based corrective actionassessment consisting of soil and groundwater sampling of leakingunderground storage tank site.*Autozone, Marshfield, MissouriProvided Phase I ESA and MDNR file review on a vacant tract of land,historically the location of a gasoline station with leaking underground storage tanks.*Caterpillar  
Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)
: Facility, Boonville, MissouriConducted Phase I ESA for a Caterpillar equipment manufacturing facility.
A-3
The facility was a large quantity generator that uses multiple*hazardous substances for operations at the site.*Prairie Queen, Centralia, MissouriConducted Phase I ESA on a gasoline station facility located in proximity to off-site gasoline stations.
:"NWVMI NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment rIlCLUr¢ H Ill rlgulle Ix.-I.
*AmerenUE, Callaway Nuclear Power PlantPreformed soil and groundwater sample collection for radiological parameters laboratory testing.
Figure A-6. Northwest Pond A-4
Sample collection locations include thehighly secure Protected Area.*Hudson Hallow, Osage Beach, MissouriProvided consultation regarding on-site wetlands including:
 
coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
APPENDIX F Credentials
and Section 404 CleanWater Act (CWA) regulatory permitting.
 
*O'Reilly Auto Parts, MissouriProvided Phase I ESAs on six stores located in central Missouri.
ADAM J. WHITE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. White, a staff Environmental Scientist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo.
*City of Springfield, MissouriProvided Phase I ESAs on six sites located in the historic Jordan Valleydowntown area of Springfield, MO.*401 S. Maple Avenue and 1057 Colfax Avenue, Hannibal, MissouriProvided PhaselI ESA on a screen printing business located adjacent tothe former location of a manufactured gas plant.*Asbestos Air Sampling, MissouriProvided asbestos air sampling at sites which include churches, university dormitories, factories, and Bagnell Dam.06105 MARK E. DIERKERFIELD GEOLO GIS TPROFESS IONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Dierker, a Field Geologist in Terracon's  
office, is responsible for conducting environmental services. He is responsible for the field services and development of reports for a wide range of projects performed. His primary environmental duties involve performance and report development for Phase I environmental site assessments, Phase II site assessments and remediation projects, wetland delineations, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews.
: Columbia, Mo. office, isresponsible for conducting environmental and geotechnical services.
RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
He isresponsible for working with drilling crews performing field services, soiland groundwater  
* Deer Valley Apartment, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) on a multi-family residential apartment complex for Prudential Mortgage Capital Company.
: sampling, and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs).RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
* Colt Railroad, Columbia, Missouri Performed on-site soil sampling related to identifying petroleum and metals contaminated soils on the site.
* Bright Start Academy,  
* Beatrice Cheese, New Hampton, Iowa Performed on-site remediatory supervision and site conditions monitoring associated with the remediation of petroleum contaminated soils on the site using subsurface injection methods.
: Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as a child care facility.
* Flat Branch Park Phase II, Columbia, MO.
* Proposed Firestone,  
Conducted data review and assisted with report developmernt for EPA Brownfield project associated with remediation of site impacted by former petroleum bulk storage facilities.
: Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as an autocare facility.
* Cell Tower Sites, Missouri and Kansas Performed Phase I ESAs and NEPA assessments as they applied to the development associated with co-located and raw land tower sites for Verizon Wireless throughout Missouri and Kansas.
* Father Tolton Catholic High School, Columbia, MissouriProvided Phase I ESA for site to be developed as a high school.* Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Reform, MissouriConducts groundwater sampling from monitoring well network andperforms field services with monitoring well abandonment and wellinstallations.
* Agriculture Storage Facilities, Kansas Performed on-site soil, groundwater, and surface water sampling, at 10 agricultural fertilizer/pesticide facilities in Kansas.
* Con-Agg, LLC, Columbia, MissouriQuality control manager responsible for management of aggregate andconcrete materials testing lab and quarry inventories.
* Missouri Theatre, Columbia, Missouri Performed a Phase I ESA and report development for the renovation of the historic Missouri Theatre building. The site is located in downtown Columbia and was the former location of a drycleaner and printing facility.
* Engineering Surveys and Services,  
* Underground Storage Tank Removal, Moberly, Missouri Provided oversight, documentation, and sampling of contaminated soils during the excavation, removal, and closure of an underground petroleum storage tank.
: Columbia, MissouriPerformed field and laboratory testing of concrete, soils, and aggregate.
* Hy-Vee, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and on-site soil and groundwater sampling for proposed Hy-Vee grocery stores and gas station.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Geology,2000, University of Missouri-ColumbiaCERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPERNuclear Soil Gauge Certification Red Cross First AidWORK HIS TORYTerracon Consultants, Inc.Field Geologist, September 20 10-presentConn-Agg, LLC ,Boone QuarriesQuality Control Manager,January 2004 -August 2009Engineering Surveys and Services, Materials Tech, April 2003-December 200306/05 TRACIE A. RAGLANDENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGERPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Ms. Ragland has 9 years of general environmental experience.
* Agricultural Storage Facility, Trenton, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA and Missouri Department of Natural Resources EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Agricultural System Management, Minor Soil Science, 2005, University of Missouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS
Ms.Ragland performs various duties including Phase I Environmental SiteAssessments (Phase I ESAs), wetland delineations, asbestos inspections, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reviews.
* OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Wetland Delineation Red Cross First Aid WORK HISTORY Terracon, Environmental Scientist, 2006-present; University of Missouri-Columbia, Soil Characterization Lab, 2006 06/05
Ms. Ragland hasalso prepared Phase I ESAs in association with Brownfields Assessments and some Limited.
 
Site Investigations (LSls). Her duties include clientinteraction; scheduling and/or performing project field work; interviews withsite contacts, state, and local government officials; analytical interpretation of research databases and historical records; wetland plant and hydric soilidentifications; interpretation and analysis of maps, aerial photographs, andsoil surveys; wetland site survey coordination; calculation of wetlandimpacts; asbestos inspection and sampling; groundwater and soil collection and interpretation of laboratory analytical results; and preparation andproduction of client deliverables.
White, Adam J. 2 (MDNR) file review for the historic agricultural chemical facility.
Ms. Ragland also has management responsibility of Phase I ESA projectswithin the Due Diligence Group (DDG) at Terracon.
*Hinton Little General Stores - Hinton, Missouri Conducted site characterization and risk based corrective action assessment consisting of soil and groundwater sampling of leaking underground storage tank site.
Duties includeoversight of projects, assignment of projects, technical review of clientdeliverables, supervision of DDG members, and training of Phase I ESApersonnel.
*Autozone, Marshfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and MDNR file review on a vacant tract of land, historically the location of a gasoline station with leaking underground storage tanks.
Ms. Ragland has also served as Acting Group Manager of theDDG on several occasions.
*Caterpillar Facility, Boonville, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA for a Caterpillar equipment manufacturing facility.
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES* Phase I ESAsConducted and managed over 300 Phase I ESAs for 9 years throughout the continental US, including undeveloped land, communications towers,multi-family residential structures, large-scale commercial developments, gasoline refueling  
The facility was a large quantity generator that uses multiple
: stations, automobile repair facilities, industrial sites,printing facilities, dry cleaners, agricultural cooperative facilities, and USPostal Service Offices.* Wetland Delineations Conducts and manages wetland delineations and wetland permitting projects in KS and MO, including:
*hazardous substances for operations at the site.
coordination with the US Army Corps ofEngineers (USACE),
*Prairie Queen, Centralia, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA on a gasoline station facility located in proximity to off-site gasoline stations.
and report preparation for Section 404 Clean WaterAct (CWA) regulatory permitting.
*AmerenUE, Callaway Nuclear Power Plant Preformed soil and groundwater sample collection for radiological parameters laboratory testing.
Delineated sites from 1 to 8,000 acres.Responsible for onsite wetland delineations utilizing mandatory technical criteria and field indicators established by the USACE and, whennecessary, by the USDA (National Food Security Act Manual and FieldIndicators of Hydric Soils in the US).* Asbestos Inspections and SamplingIn conjunction with Phase I ESAs, conducts limited asbestos inspections and sampling of properties ranging from multi-family residential structures and commercial developments to heavy industrial sites in KSand MO.* NEPA ReviewslEnvironlmenltal Assessment (EA)Conducted NEPA Reviews for existing and proposed communications towers and a fiber optic cable corridor, including an EA for a proposedmarina at a USACE lake. Responsible for field work, contact with federal,state, and local government  
Sample collection locations include the highly secure Protected Area.
: agencies, coordination of Cultural ResourceInvestigation for historical preservation clearance, and production of client2/07EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Honors inEnvironmental
*Hudson Hallow, Osage Beach, Missouri Provided consultation regarding on-site wetlands including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting.
: Studies, 1997,University of KansasBachelor of Science in Biology,Cellular  
*O'Reilly Auto Parts, Missouri Provided Phase I ESAs on six stores located in central Missouri.
: Biology, 1992,University of KansasCE RTI FICATI ONS40-Hour Hazardous Waste SiteOperations
*City of Springfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESAs on six sites located in the historic Jordan Valley downtown area of Springfield, MO.
: Training, 1999AHERA Asbestos Inspector:
*401 S. Maple Avenue and 1057 Colfax Avenue, Hannibal, Missouri Provided PhaselI ESA on a screen printing business located adjacent to the former location of a manufactured gas plant.
Kansas, Missouri, 1998Category A Certification inRadioisotopes and Radiation Safety in Research, 1997AFFILIATIONS Society of Wetland Scientists WORK HISTORYTerracon, Environmental Scientist, 1998-present University of Kansas, ResearchAssistant; 1994-1998 University of Minnesota, GraduateResearch Assistant, 1993-1994 Oklahoma State University, Laboratory Technician, 1992-1993ADDITIONAL COURSESWetland Construction andRestoration, Wetland TrainingInstitute, 2001Wetland Plant Identification, BioticConsultants, Inc., 2000Basic Processes in Hydric Soils,North Carolina State University, 200038-Hour Army Corns of Engineers Wetland Delineation  
*Asbestos Air Sampling, Missouri Provided asbestos air sampling at sites which include churches, university dormitories, factories, and Bagnell Dam.
&Management Training Program,Richard Chinn Environmental
06105
: Training, Inc., 1998  
 
: RAGLAND, TRACIE A.deliverables.
MARK E. DIERKER FIELD GEOLO GIS T PROFESS IONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Dierker, a Field Geologist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo. office, is responsible for conducting environmental and geotechnical services. He is responsible for working with drilling crews performing field services, soil and groundwater sampling, and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs).
* LSIs/Preliminary Assessment (PA)/Site Inspection (SI)Conducted and managed LSls including a PA/SI on a former government WWII facility.
RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Responsibilities included preparation of work scopes, collection of soil and groundwater  
* Bright Start Academy, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as a child care facility.
: samples, preparation of samples forshipment to a laboratory for analysis, interpretation of analytical  
* Proposed Firestone, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as an autocare facility.
: results, and preparation of clientdeliverables.
* Father Tolton Catholic High School, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA for site to be developed as a high school.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Phase I ESAs* Falley's Food Stores -KS and MO (Associated Wholesale Grocers-Kansas City, KS)Coordinated research database and historical records procurement, technical report editing, scheduling and/or performing field work, and assisting with report preparation for 25 Falley's Food stores.* Pizza Hut -Southeastern US (National Pizza Company International, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)Coordinated and managed field work, technical report review and editing, and client deliverable production for 47 Pizza Hut facilities located across the southeastern US in 10 business days.*Montezuma Wind Farm -Montezuma, KS (Snyder and Associates, Inc.-Atlantic, IA)Conducted field work, including a low-altitude aerial reconnaissance, and report preparation for a proposedwindmill energy generating facility located on 8,000 acres of farmland in western KS.* Industrial Warehouses  
* Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Reform, Missouri Conducts groundwater sampling from monitoring well network and performs field services with monitoring well abandonment and well installations.
-Kansas City, MO and KS (Block Income Fund I, L.P.-Kansas City, MO)A portfolio of 5 industrial warehouses containing multiple tenants totaling 390,000sf.
* Con-Agg, LLC, Columbia, Missouri Quality control manager responsible for management of aggregate and concrete materials testing lab and quarry inventories.
* Martin Tractor Company -Topeka, KS (Martin Tractor Company-Topeka, KS) ... A large-scale truck maintenance/service and parts testing and rebuilding  
* Engineering Surveys and Services, Columbia, Missouri Performed field and laboratory testing of concrete, soils, and aggregate.
: facility, totaling 1~66,00sf,.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Geology, 2000, University of Missouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Nuclear Soil Gauge Certification Red Cross First Aid WORK HIS TORY Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Withnumerous aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), an oil burner, mud trap, paint room, former undergr.ound storage tanks (USTs), and multiple waste streams..
Field Geologist, September 20 10-present Conn-Agg, LLC,Boone Quarries Quality Control Manager, January 2004 - August 2009 Engineering Surveys and Services, Materials Tech, April 2003-December 2003 06/05
* Plastic Packaging Technologies  
 
-Kansas City, KS (Stonehenge  
TRACIE A. RAGLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Ms. Ragland has 9 years of general environmental experience. Ms.
: Partners, Inc.-Columbus, OH)-..A 65,000sf facility associated with the production,  
Ragland performs various duties including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I ESAs), wetland delineations, asbestos inspections, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reviews. Ms. Ragland has also prepared Phase I ESAs in association with Brownfields Assessments and some Limited. Site Investigations (LSls). Her duties include client interaction; scheduling and/or performing project field work; interviews with site contacts, state, and local government officials; analytical interpretation of research databases and historical records; wetland plant and hydric soil identifications; interpretation and analysis of maps, aerial photographs, and soil surveys; wetland site survey coordination; calculation of wetland impacts; asbestos inspection and sampling; groundwater and soil collection and interpretation of laboratory analytical results; and preparation and production of client deliverables.
: printing, and distribution of roll stack packaging and plasticbags, with flexigraphic wide-web  
Ms. Ragland also has management responsibility of Phase I ESA projects within the Due Diligence Group (DDG) at Terracon. Duties include oversight of projects, assignment of projects, technical review of client deliverables, supervision of DDG members, and training of Phase I ESA personnel. Ms. Ragland has also served as Acting Group Manager of the DDG on several occasions.
: printing, solvent-less lamination operations, and a volatile organiccompound emissions burner.*Mize Road -Lenexa, KS (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)Proposed expansion and improvement of 1.5 to 2 miles of Mize Road and West 79th Street in Lenexa, KS.*Sovereign Business Forms -Girard, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)An 80,000sf facility associated with the printing, packaging, warehousing, and distribution of custombusiness forms, including the production of metal photo plates from film and negatives.
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES
*White Lakes Center- Topeka, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL) ..A retail facility consisting of a 414,582sf mall, an 8,141sf former Penny's Automotive Service Center, a2,750sf Burger King restaurant, and associated parking and drives.*Plant Property  
* Phase I ESAs Conducted and managed over 300 Phase I ESAs for 9 years throughout the continental US, including undeveloped land, communications towers, multi-family residential structures, large-scale commercial developments, gasoline refueling stations, automobile repair facilities, industrial sites, printing facilities, dry cleaners, agricultural cooperative facilities, and US Postal Service Offices.
-St. Joseph, MO (Premium Pork, LLC-Lenexa, KS)A 60-acre tract consisting of a chemical storage warehouse (former meat packing facility);
* Wetland Delineations Conducts and manages wetland delineations and wetland permitting projects in KS and MO, including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and report preparation for Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting. Delineated sites from 1 to 8,000 acres.
palletmanufacturing company; truck maintenance facility and empty dumpster storage; vacant grass-covered land; farmland; and dilapidated hog pens.*Farmers Coop Sites -KS (Farmers Cooperative Association-Lawrence, KS)7 Farmers Coop facilities in northeast KS which included:
Responsible for onsite wetland delineations utilizing mandatory technical criteria and field indicators established by the USACE and, when necessary, by the USDA (National Food Security Act Manual and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the US).
liquid/dry fertilizer plants, grain storage elevators, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities,  
* Asbestos Inspections and Sampling In conjunction with Phase I ESAs, conducts limited asbestos inspections and sampling of properties ranging from multi-family residential structures and commercial developments to heavy industrial sites in KS and MO.
: offices, tire shops, feed mills, storage yards, bulk fuel storage ASTfacilities, a retail store, and filling station.2 2/07  
* NEPA ReviewslEnvironlmenltal Assessment (EA)
: RAGLAND, TRACIE A.* Agricultural Chemical Facilities  
Conducted NEPA Reviews for existing and proposed communications towers and a fiber optic cable corridor, including an EA for a proposed marina at a USACE lake. Responsible for field work, contact with federal, state, and local government agencies, coordination of Cultural Resource Investigation for historical preservation clearance, and production of client 2/07 EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Honors in Environmental Studies, 1997, University of Kansas Bachelor of Science in Biology, Cellular Biology, 1992, University of Kansas CE RTI FICATI ONS 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Site Operations Training, 1999 AHERA Asbestos Inspector:
-KS and MO (United Agri Products-Greeley, CO)15 agricultural chemical blending facilities in north central KS and northwest MO which included liquid/dry fertilizer plants, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities,  
Kansas, Missouri, 1998 Category A Certification in Radioisotopes and Radiation Safety in Research, 1997 AFFILIATIONS Society of Wetland Scientists WORK HISTORY Terracon, Environmental Scientist, 1998-present University of Kansas, Research Assistant; 1994-1998 University of Minnesota, Graduate Research Assistant, 1993-1994 Oklahoma State University, Laboratory Technician, 1992-1993 ADDITIONAL COURSES Wetland Construction and Restoration, Wetland Training Institute, 2001 Wetland Plant Identification, Biotic Consultants, Inc., 2000 Basic Processes in Hydric Soils, North Carolina State University, 2000 38-Hour Army Corns of Engineers Wetland Delineation &
: offices, and maintenance shops.* Proposed County Buildings  
Management Training Program, Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc., 1998
-Olathe, KS (Johnson County, KS-Olathe, KS)5 city blocks in downtown Olathe, KS including parking areas and multiple commercial, government, andresidential structures with extensive historical background.
 
Brownfields Revitalization Act Phase I ESAs* Former St. Joseph Power & Light Company -St. Joseph, MO (Heartland Foundation-St.
RAGLAND, TRACIE A.
Joseph, MO)40,000sf general commodities warehouse facility.
deliverables.
* Former Junction City Foundry Property  
* LSIs/Preliminary Assessment (PA)/Site Inspection (SI)
-Junction City, KS (Kansas Department of Health andEnvironment-Topeka, KS)41 acres consisting of a 106,000sf former electric heavy iron foundry structure, a vacant 1-story officebuilding, an abandoned 2-story farmhouse, and outbuildings.
Conducted and managed LSls including a PA/SI on a former government WWII facility. Responsibilities included preparation of work scopes, collection of soil and groundwater samples, preparation of samples for shipment to a laboratory for analysis, interpretation of analytical results, and preparation of client deliverables.
* EBA Building  
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Phase I ESAs
-Topeka, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS)2 acres consisting of a 60,000sf three-story medical office building and parking area.* 312 South Second Street- Atchison, KS (City of Atchison-Atchison, KS)1.2-acre metals and plastics salvage yard.* Former Frisco Laboratory Building  
* Falley's Food Stores - KS and MO (Associated Wholesale Grocers-Kansas City, KS)
-Springfield, MO (City of Springfield-Springfield, MO)15,000sf former railroad laboratory testing facility.
Coordinated research database and historical records procurement, technical report editing, scheduling and/or performing field work, and assisting with report preparation for 25 Falley's Food stores.
* Pizza Hut - Southeastern US (National Pizza Company International, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)
Coordinated and managed field work, technical report review and editing, and client deliverable production for 47 Pizza Hut facilities located across the southeastern US in 10 business days.
*Montezuma Wind Farm - Montezuma, KS (Snyder and Associates, Inc.-Atlantic, IA)
Conducted field work, including a low-altitude aerial reconnaissance, and report preparation for a proposed windmill energy generating facility located on 8,000 acres of farmland in western KS.
* Industrial Warehouses - Kansas City, MO and KS (Block Income Fund I, L.P.-Kansas City, MO)
A portfolio of 5 industrial warehouses containing multiple tenants totaling 390,000sf.
* Martin Tractor Company - Topeka, KS (Martin Tractor Company-Topeka, KS)
A large-scale truck maintenance/service and parts testing and rebuilding facility, totaling 1~66,00sf,. With numerous aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), an oil burner, mud trap, paint room, former undergr.ound storage tanks (USTs), and multiple waste streams..
* Plastic Packaging Technologies - Kansas City, KS (Stonehenge Partners, Inc.-Columbus, OH)-..
A 65,000sf facility associated with the production, printing, and distribution of roll stack packaging and plastic bags, with flexigraphic wide-web printing, solvent-less lamination operations, and a volatile organic compound emissions burner.
*Mize Road - Lenexa, KS (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)
Proposed expansion and improvement of 1.5 to 2 miles of Mize Road and West 7 9 th Street in Lenexa, KS.
*Sovereign Business Forms - Girard, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)
An 80,000sf facility associated with the printing, packaging, warehousing, and distribution of custom business forms, including the production of metal photo plates from film and negatives.
*White Lakes Center-Topeka, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL).
A retail facility consisting of a 414,582sf mall, an 8,141sf former Penny's Automotive Service Center, a 2,750sf Burger King restaurant, and associated parking and drives.
*Plant Property - St. Joseph, MO (Premium Pork, LLC-Lenexa, KS)
A 60-acre tract consisting of a chemical storage warehouse (former meat packing facility); pallet manufacturing company; truck maintenance facility and empty dumpster storage; vacant grass-covered land; farmland; and dilapidated hog pens.
*Farmers Coop Sites - KS (Farmers Cooperative Association-Lawrence, KS) 7 Farmers Coop facilities in northeast KS which included: liquid/dry fertilizer plants, grain storage elevators, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, tire shops, feed mills, storage yards, bulk fuel storage AST facilities, a retail store, and filling station.
2 2/07
 
RAGLAND, TRACIE A.
* Agricultural Chemical Facilities - KS and MO (United Agri Products-Greeley, CO) 15 agricultural chemical blending facilities in north central KS and northwest MO which included liquid/dry fertilizer plants, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, and maintenance shops.
* Proposed County Buildings - Olathe, KS (Johnson County, KS-Olathe, KS) 5 city blocks in downtown Olathe, KS including parking areas and multiple commercial, government, and residential structures with extensive historical background.
Brownfields Revitalization Act Phase I ESAs
* Former St. Joseph Power & Light Company - St. Joseph, MO (Heartland Foundation-St. Joseph, MO) 40,000sf general commodities warehouse facility.
* Former Junction City Foundry Property - Junction City, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 41 acres consisting of a 106,000sf former electric heavy iron foundry structure, a vacant 1-story office building, an abandoned 2-story farmhouse, and outbuildings.
* EBA Building - Topeka, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 2 acres consisting of a 60,000sf three-story medical office building and parking area.
* 312 South Second Street-Atchison, KS (City of Atchison-Atchison, KS) 1.2-acre metals and plastics salvage yard.
* Former Frisco Laboratory Building - Springfield, MO (City of Springfield-Springfield, MO) 15,000sf former railroad laboratory testing facility.
Limited Site Investigations/PNlSl
Limited Site Investigations/PNlSl
* Hardesty Federal Complex -Kansas City, MO (US General Services Administration-Kansas City, MO)Conducted PA and SI under the Comprehensive Environmental  
* Hardesty Federal Complex - Kansas City, MO (US General Services Administration-Kansas City, MO)
: Response, Compensation, and Liability Actof 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), including soiland groundwater analyses and lead sampling, at 7 structures on 18 acres, including a former clothingchemical pretreatment facility and indoor firing range. PA/SI reports reviewed and approved by the MissouriDepartment of Natural Resources.
Conducted PA and SI under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), including soil and groundwater analyses and lead sampling, at 7 structures on 18 acres, including a former clothing chemical pretreatment facility and indoor firing range. PA/SI reports reviewed and approved by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources.
* USA Detergents  
* USA Detergents - Harrisonville, MO (Pinnacle Capital Group-Philadelphia, PA)
-Harrisonville, MO (Pinnacle Capital Group-Philadelphia, PA)Conducted groundwater and soil sampling near an abandoned UST. Conducted outfall sampling to establish baseline analytical data for use in the application of a wastewater/storm water discharge permit.*Commercial Retail Redevelopment  
Conducted groundwater and soil sampling near an abandoned UST. Conducted outfall sampling to establish baseline analytical data for use in the application of a wastewater/storm water discharge permit.
-Overland Park, KS (Continental Consulting Engineers, Inc.-Leawood, KS)Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from surrounding former dry-cleaning and printing/photography facilities.
*Commercial Retail Redevelopment - Overland Park, KS (Continental Consulting Engineers, Inc.-
*Night Club and Office Space -Kansas City, MO (MC Real Estate Services, Inc.-Kansas City, MO)Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite gasoline tanks and surrounding former dry-cleaning, spray painting/auto repair, and filling station facilities.
Leawood, KS)
*Proposed Aldi -Lee's Summit, MO (Aldi, lnc.-Olathe, KS)Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite towing/maintenance activities.
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from surrounding former dry-cleaning and printing/photography facilities.
*Night Club and Office Space - Kansas City, MO (MC Real Estate Services, Inc.-Kansas City, MO)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite gasoline tanks and surrounding former dry-cleaning, spray painting/auto repair, and filling station facilities.
*Proposed Aldi - Lee's Summit, MO (Aldi, lnc.-Olathe, KS)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite towing/maintenance activities.
2/07
2/07
* MEILS~OENWM/-2 015-RAI-0O01 Rev. 0Appendix I -NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment I-i  
 
.,:NWMIS....:NOArhWEST MED CAL =SOTOPESReport Cover SheetReport No: NWMI-2015-RPT-002 Revision No: 0Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI Radioisotope Production FacilityReport Title:Project Title:Status: III In Process [] FinalContains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?
* ;=e.NWM**
D]Yes []NoApprovals Review (R) andApproval (A) Printed Name Signature DateOriginator A J. Belier 10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass Ct 10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)  
MEILS~OE NWM/-2 015-RAI-0O01 Rev. 0 Appendix I -
[] N/ARevision HistoryRev Date Revision Description Affected Pages0 10/1/2015 Initial Issue All*1-This page intentionally left blank.
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment I-i
* O 0*e* e OO0O0 oS.
 
* 0 *NWM INORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPESNorthwest Medical Isotopes, LLCRadioisotope Production FacilityVegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0October 2015Prepared by:Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256Corvallis, OR 97330 This page intentionally left blank.  
.,:NWMI S....:NOArhWEST MED CAL =SOTOPES Report Cover Sheet Report No:
;..., NWMI* oe'-* : e= " " NORTllWESTMEI)ICALI$OTOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLCRadioisotope Production FacilityVegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0Date Published:
NWMI-2015-RPT-002 Revision No:
October 1, 2015Title: Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature:
0 Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility Report
:!;'. ;!NWMIN oo "EORThWESTMAED CA SOIpESNWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.  
 
*,, ,.NERTAWESTMEDIICAL SOTUPESNWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment CONTENTS
==Title:==
Project
 
==Title:==
Status:
III In Process
[] Final Contains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?
D]Yes
[]No Approvals Review (R) and Approval (A)
Printed Name Signature Date Originator A
J. Belier y*
10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass Ct A4*p'~-"
10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)
[] N/A Revision History Rev Date Revision Description Affected Pages 0
10/1/2015 Initial Issue All
*1-
 
This page intentionally left blank.
 
O 0*e
* e OO0O0 o S.
* 0
* NWM I NORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPES Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 October 2015 Prepared by:
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC 815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256 Corvallis, OR 97330
 
This page intentionally left blank.
 
.:.*. ;..., NWMI
* =e*
oe'-
* : e= " " NORTllWESTMEI)ICALI$OTOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 Date Published:
October 1, 2015
 
==Title:==
Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature:  
*'J
:!;'. ;!NWMI N
oo "EORThWESTMAED CA SOIpES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
 
*,,,.NERTAWESTMEDIICAL SOTUPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment CONTENTS


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology..............................................................................
*.......... 1 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT........................................................................ 2 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 4
==4.0 ASSESSMENT==
CONCLUSION........................................................................... 5


........................................................................................
==5.0 REFERENCES==
11.1 Background
.............................................................................................. 6 APPENDICES Appendix A -
..........................................................................................
Appendix B -
11.2 Methodology
Appendix C -
..............................................................................
Appendix D -
12.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT
Table 1.
........................................................................
Table 2.
23.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT..........................................................................
Transect Map................................................................................... A-i Quadrate Photographs.......................................................................... B-i Plant Photographs.............................................................................. C-i Qualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map................................... D-i TABLES Frequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site................... 2 Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site............ 3
44.0 ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION...........................................................................  


==55.0 REFERENCES==
;@.Y.NW IV!
*;.o;.NURThWESTMED CALIOOE NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment TERMS Acronyms 99Mo Discovery Ridge EPA GPS LEU NWMI RPF U.S.
molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research Park Environmental Protection Agency geographic positioning system low-enriched uranium Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC radioisotope production facility United States Units ha kin m
2 in hectare kilometer meter square meter ii


..............................................................................................
. NW
6APPENDICES Appendix A -Appendix B -Appendix C -Appendix D -Table 1.Table 2.Transect Map ...................................................................................
,t,,*.NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 N'oAL Iea,:
A-iQuadrate Photographs..........................................................................
RPF Vegetation Assessment
B-iPlant Photographs
..............................................................................
C-iQualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map ...................................
D-iTABLESFrequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site...................
2Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site ............
3
;@.Y.NW IV!*;.o;.NURThWESTMED CALIOOENWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment TERMSAcronyms99MoDiscovery RidgeEPAGPSLEUNWMIRPFU.S.molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research ParkEnvironmental Protection Agencygeographic positioning systemlow-enriched uraniumNorthwest Medical Isotopes, LLCradioisotope production facilityUnited StatesUnitshakinm2inhectarekilometer metersquare meterii
.NW Rev. 0N'oAL Iea,: RPF Vegetation Assessment


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
This assessment consists of quantitative and qualitative vegetation surveys that were conducted to evaluate the current state of vegetation on the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)
Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. A quantitative vegetation assessment was conducted near the end of the growing season that collected frequency and density data.
This report describes the findings from the quantitative and qualitative assessments conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessments is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.


This assessment consists of quantitative and qualitative vegetation surveys that were conducted toevaluate the current state of vegetation on the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. A quantitative vegetation assessment was conducted nearthe end of the growing season that collected frequency and density data.This report describes the findings from the quantitative and qualitative assessments conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessments is used to describethe current vegetation conditions of the site.1.1 BACKGROUND NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum 99 (99Mo) usinglow-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery RidgeResearch Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, BooneCounty, Missouri.
==1.1 BACKGROUND==
The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east ofKansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north ofU.S. Highway 63.The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for theresearch and monitoring of ecosystems.
NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum 99 (99Mo) using low-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery Ridge Research Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east of Kansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north of U.S. Highway 63.
Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systemsthat have similar vegetation,  
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for the research and monitoring of ecosystems. Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systems that have similar vegetation, climate, geology, and physiology. The RFP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located on gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region was mostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). After European settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gently rolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh and Schroeder, 2002).
: climate, geology, and physiology.
The proposed site is located in a developed industrial park that was historically used as cultivated cropland and pasture. The current vegetation at the site consists of mostly grasses reminiscent of open pastureland.
The RFP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located on gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region wasmostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). AfterEuropean settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gentlyrolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh andSchroeder, 2002).The proposed site is located in a developed industrial park that was historically used as cultivated croplandand pasture.
This report provides a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the vegetation currently on the site.
The current vegetation at the site consists of mostly grasses reminiscent of open pastureland.
1.2 METHODOLOGY The quantitative assessment was performed with two randomly selected transects within the RPF site.
This report provides a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the vegetation currently on the site.1.2 METHODOLOGY The quantitative assessment was performed with two randomly selected transects within the RPF site.At each location, general areas were identified for transects.
At each location, general areas were identified for transects. The exact transect starting location was then selected randomly by tossing a stake in the air. Each transect ending location was selected randomly by tossing a stake in the air and walking in the direction that the stake landed. Transect lengths were 50 meter (in). Transect ends were recorded with a Trimnble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS).
The exact transect starting location was thenselected randomly by tossing a stake in the air. Each transect ending location was selected randomly bytossing a stake in the air and walking in the direction that the stake landed. Transect lengths were50 meter (in). Transect ends were recorded with a Trimnble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS).A map of the transect locations is included in Appendix A.After transects were defined, sample plots were established at 5 m intervals along each transect.
A map of the transect locations is included in Appendix A.
Sampleplots were established with a 1 square meter (in2) (0.5 m x 2 m) plot frame quadrat.
After transects were defined, sample plots were established at 5 m intervals along each transect. Sample plots were established with a 1 square meter (in 2) (0.5 m x 2 m) plot frame quadrat. To ensure that sample points wcrc sampled randomly, the starting point was chosen between 0 and 5 m, and then a random number between 0 and 20 was used to determine the meters to be taken perpendicular (alternating direction every 5 m) to the transect. Photographs of each quadrat are provided in Appendix B. Within each quadrat, data was collected for density and frequency.
To ensure thatsample points wcrc sampled randomly, the starting point was chosen between 0 and 5 m, and then arandom number between 0 and 20 was used to determine the meters to be taken perpendicular (alternating direction every 5 m) to the transect.
The qualitative assessment was performed in conjunction with the quantitative assessment. The qualitative assessment involved identifying significant vegetation not specifically found in the plots. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in random transects across the property.
Photographs of each quadrat are provided in Appendix B. Withineach quadrat, data was collected for density and frequency.
1
The qualitative assessment was performed in conjunction with the quantitative assessment.
 
Thequalitative assessment involved identifying significant vegetation not specifically found in the plots. Thequalitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and inrandom transects across the property.
NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT Each transect was located using the method described in Section 1.0. Transect 1 was located on the southern portion and crossed the property from the east to the west. Transect 2 was located on the northern portion and crossed the property from the east to the north, diagonal from the Transect 1.
1 NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT Each transect was located using the method described in Section 1.0. Transect 1 was located on thesouthern portion and crossed the property from the east to the west. Transect 2 was located on thenorthern portion and crossed the property from the east to the north, diagonal from the Transect 1.Plant species encountered during the quantitative assessment consisted mostly of non-native plantstypically found in disturbed areas such as pastures and right-of-ways (MDOC, 2015). Photographs ofencountered species during the quantitative and qualitative assessments are provided in Appendix C.Encountered species that are not classified as non-native (White Heath Aster and Goldenrod) arecommonly found throughout prairie/oak forest plant communities (MDOC, 2015).Table 1 describes encountered species with frequencies of all of the species found on the site. Plantfrequency is the percent of occurrence within each transect and represents the species for the entire site.Table 1. Frequency of Plant Species on theRadioisotope Production Facility SiteIndian GrassCrown VetchHorse NettleWhite CloverTall FescueBull ThistleSorghastrum nutansSecuriger variaSolanum carolinense Trifolium repensColium arundinaceum Cirsium vulgateNon-native Non-native Non-native No-atvNon-native Non-native 1007060503010100501040Species with the highest density on the property consist of Indian Grass (Sorghastrum nutans) and YellowFoxtail (Setaria pumila) (Table 2). The species density is the number of plants/in 2.Table 2 describes thespecies densities on the property.
Plant species encountered during the quantitative assessment consisted mostly of non-native plants typically found in disturbed areas such as pastures and right-of-ways (MDOC, 2015). Photographs of encountered species during the quantitative and qualitative assessments are provided in Appendix C.
No Federal-or State-listed species were encountered during thequantitative assessment.
Encountered species that are not classified as non-native (White Heath Aster and Goldenrod) are commonly found throughout prairie/oak forest plant communities (MDOC, 2015).
2  
Table 1 describes encountered species with frequencies of all of the species found on the site. Plant frequency is the percent of occurrence within each transect and represents the species for the entire site.
*: eOOt.:.-..; WMI* ". eo
Table 1. Frequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site Indian Grass Crown Vetch Horse Nettle White Clover Tall Fescue Bull Thistle Sorghastrum nutans Securiger varia Solanum carolinense Trifolium repens Colium arundinaceum Cirsium vulgate Non-native Non-native Non-native No-atv Non-native Non-native 100 70 60 50 30 10 100 50 10 40 Species with the highest density on the property consist of Indian Grass (Sorghastrum nutans) and Yellow Foxtail (Setaria pumila) (Table 2). The species density is the number of plants/in2. Table 2 describes the species densities on the property. No Federal-or State-listed species were encountered during the quantitative assessment.
* NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Table 2. Species Density of Plant Species on theRadioisotope Production Facility SiteBull ThistleField CressHorse NettleIndian GrassWhite CloverYellow FoxtailCirsium vulgareLepidium campestre Solanum carolinense Sorghastrum nutansTrifolium repensSetaria pumilaNon-native 0.3Non-native 1.4Non-native 1.6Non-native 113INon-native 1.1Non-native 9.60.70.71165.93.83 I 11 NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0?...¶EU w EilRPF Vegetation Assessment 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT Observations at the NWMI RPF site occurred on September 30 and October 1, 2015. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in randomtransects across the property.
2
Photographs of the property were taken at various locations and areincluded in Appendix D, along with a map of the photographed locations.
 
Photographs of notable plantsspecies taken throughout the assessment are provided in Appendix C.During the qualitative assessment, no Federal-or State-listed species were encountered.
eOOt
An AmericanSycamore (Platanus occidentalis) was encountered on the east side of the property.
.:.-..; WMI
This tree species iscommonly found through the state of Missouri and in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).Other species encountered during the qualitative assessment and not the quantitative assessment includeCow Parsnip (Heracleaum lanatum),
* ". eo
Partridge Pea (Cassia chamaecrista),
* I*K3111WIE:*IIBICt&BOlI*PI*
and English Plantain (Plantago Lanceolata).
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Table 2. Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site Bull Thistle Field Cress Horse Nettle Indian Grass White Clover Yellow Foxtail Cirsium vulgare Lepidium campestre Solanum carolinense Sorghastrum nutans Trifolium repens Setaria pumila Non-native 0.3 Non-native 1.4 Non-native 1.6 Non-native 113 I
Both of these species are common in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).While conducting the qualitative assessment, the inspector did encounter approximately nine EurasianCollared-Doves (Streptopelia decaocto).
Non-native 1.1 Non-native 9.6 0.7 0.7 116 5.9 3.8 3
These birds are common and found statewide, typically usingpastures, trees, or powerlines to roost. No other wildlife were encountered onsite during the qualitative orquantitative assessment.
 
4  
*.:,*t;' *.
!..~;:;i Ni~ aImu NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 01 D1ifif iI RPF Vegetation Assessment 4.0 ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION The results of the quantitative or qualitative assessment did not identify any Federal-or State-listed species and/or species of concern.
I 11 NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0
Based on observations onsite and of the surrounding areas, thevegetation found onsite is not unique to this location, and these species are commonly found on othersites throughout the region that have been used as cattle pasture.5  
?...¶EU w EilRPF Vegetation Assessment 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT Observations at the NWMI RPF site occurred on September 30 and October 1, 2015. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in random transects across the property. Photographs of the property were taken at various locations and are included in Appendix D, along with a map of the photographed locations. Photographs of notable plants species taken throughout the assessment are provided in Appendix C.
.*'*. NW M~K I NWM.-2o15-RPx-0o2, Rev. 0* EV o." *l RPF Vegetation Assessment
During the qualitative assessment, no Federal-or State-listed species were encountered. An American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) was encountered on the east side of the property. This tree species is commonly found through the state of Missouri and in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).
Other species encountered during the qualitative assessment and not the quantitative assessment include Cow Parsnip (Heracleaum lanatum), Partridge Pea (Cassia chamaecrista), and English Plantain (Plantago Lanceolata). Both of these species are common in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).
While conducting the qualitative assessment, the inspector did encounter approximately nine Eurasian Collared-Doves (Streptopelia decaocto). These birds are common and found statewide, typically using pastures, trees, or powerlines to roost. No other wildlife were encountered onsite during the qualitative or quantitative assessment.
4
 
!..~;:;i Ni~ aImu NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0
.*;: 1 D1ifif iI RPF Vegetation Assessment
 
==4.0 ASSESSMENT==
CONCLUSION The results of the quantitative or qualitative assessment did not identify any Federal-or State-listed species and/or species of concern. Based on observations onsite and of the surrounding areas, the vegetation found onsite is not unique to this location, and these species are commonly found on other sites throughout the region that have been used as cattle pasture.
5
 
.*'*. NW M~K I
NWM.-2o15-RPx-0o2, Rev. 0 EV o." *l RPF Vegetation Assessment


==5.0 REFERENCES==
==5.0 REFERENCES==
: Chapman, S. S., Omemik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002,"Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, andphotographs):
Chapman, S. S., Omemik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002, "Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia," U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000), 2002.
Reston, Virginia,"
MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.
U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000),
Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.
2002.MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department ofConservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.6  
6
.;,','.:MI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix ATransect MapA-i NWMI.'e oo',NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.A-ii  
 
:NWNMINWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Loca~on Map..-Vqetation Assesment TinhectIRPF FidlityProperty Boundary,/X, FenceFigure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Transect MapA-1  
.;,','.:MI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix A Transect Map A-i
;NWMIJ~NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.A-2  
 
: NWMI* eo oe'.: .%e?;,; *;.e.,. : ImmVCr.St" NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)A-3  
="* NWMI
;""; NWMI* =0 Qe*.: %oo;:;o o; IIItlDgCAL R$NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-6. Northwest PondA-4 I/IINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix BQuadrate Photographs B-i i;NWAMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURESFigure B-i1.Figure B-2.Figure B-3.Figure B-4.Figure B-5.Figure B-6.Figure B-7.Figure B-8.Figure B-9.Figure B-b1.Figure B-ti1.Figure B- 12.Figure B- 13.Figure B- 14.Figure B-i15.Figure B- 16.Figure B- 17.Figure B- 18.Figure B- 19.Figure B-20.Figure B-21.Figure B-22.Figure B-23.Figure B-24.Transect 1 Looking West......................................................................
.'e oo',
B-iTransect 1 Quadrat 1 ...........................................................................
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
B-iTransect 1 Quadrat 2...........................................................................
A-ii
B-iTransect i Quadrat 3 ...........................................................................
:NWNMI NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Loca~on Map
B-iTransect i Quadrat 4...........................................................................
..-
B-2Transect 1 Quadrat S ...........................................................................
* Vqetation Assesment TinhectI RPF Fidlity Property Boundary
B-2Transect i Quadrat 6...........................................................................
,/X, Fence Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Transect Map A-1
B-2Transect i Quadrat 7...........................................................................
 
B-2Transect 1 Quadrat 8...........................................................................
;NWMIJ~
B-3Transect i Quadrat 9...........................................................................
NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
B-3Transect i Quadrat 10..........................................................................
A-2
B-3Transect 1 Looking East.......................................................................
: NWMI
B-3Transect 2 Looking Northeast.................................................................
* eo oe'.
B-4Transect 2 Quadrat 1 ...........................................................................
:.%e?;,; *
B-4Transect 2 Quadrat 2 ...........................................................................
;.e.,. :
B-4Transect 2 Quadrat 3 ...........................................................................
ImmVCr.St" Iml*u.
B-4Transect 2 Quadrat 4...........................................................................
* NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)
B-5Transect 2 Quadrat 5 ...........................................................................
Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)
B-5Transect 2 Quadrat 6 ...........................................................................
A-3
B-STransect 2 Quadrat 7 ...........................................................................
 
B-5Transect 2 Quadrat 8 ...........................................................................
;""; NWMI
B-6Transect 2 Quadrat 9 ...........................................................................
* =0 Qe*.
B-6Transect 2 Quadrat 10..........................................................................
: %oo;:
B-6Transect 2 Looking Southwest................................................................
;o o;
B-6B-ii  
P*DIN134VtlEs'r IIItlDgCAL R$
*: ..,..NWM INWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-i. Transect 1 Looking WestFigure B.-2. Transect 1 Quadrat 1Figure B-3. Transect 1 Quadrat 2Figure B-4. Transect 1 Quadrat 3B-i  
NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-6. Northwest Pond A-4
~;NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-5. Transect 1 Quadrat 4Figure B-6. Transect 1 Quadrat 5Figure B-7. Transect 1 Quadrat 6Figure B-8. Transect 1 Quadrat 7B-2 NWM INWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-9. Transect 1 Quadrat 8Figure B-10. Transect 1 Quadrat 9Figure B-11. Transect 1 Quadrat 10Figure B-12. Transect 1 Looking EastB-3 NW !YVMINWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-13. Transect 2 Looking Northeast Figure B-14. Transect 2 Quadrat 1Figure B-15. Transect 2 Quadrat 2Figure B-16. Transect 2 Quadrat 3B-4  
 
:....:.:
.!:*=:;. I*IYL I/II NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix B Quadrate Photographs B-i
NWMI* o0 gO'*NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-17. Transect 2 Quadrat 4Figure B-18. Transect 2 Quadrat 5Figure B-19.Transect 2 Quadrat 6Figure B-20.Transect 2 Quadrat 7B-5  
 
:": NWMI.'o@ @O'.* %002; :" -"
i;NWAMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURES Figure B-i1.
ISOTOItIES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-21.Transect 2 Quadrat 8Figure B-22.Transect 2 Quadrat 9Figure B-23. Transect 2 Quadrat 10Figure B-24. Transect 2 Looking Southwest B-6 i.JYYJ°ANWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix CPlant Photographs C-i  
Figure B-2.
..IUlMAR IOe'...,,... 11 VV IVll.::e,.:. amamMUT NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURESFigure C-i1.Figure C-2.Figure C-3.Figure C-4.Figure C-5.Figure C-6.Figure C-7.Figure C-8.Figure C-9.Figure C- 10.Figure C-il.Figure C- 12.Figure C- 13.Indian Grass ....................................................................................
Figure B-3.
C-i1Yellow Foxtail..................................................................................
Figure B-4.
C-i1Goldenrod.......................................................................................
Figure B-5.
C-2White Heath Aster .............................................................................
Figure B-6.
C-2Partridge Pea....................................................................................
Figure B-7.
C-2English Plantain  
Figure B-8.
................................................................................
Figure B-9.
C-2Horseweed......................................................................................
Figure B-b1.
C-3Horse Nettle ....................................................................................
Figure B-ti1.
C-3Field Cress......................................................................................
Figure B-12.
C-3White Clover....................................................................................
Figure B-13.
C-3Bull Thistle .....................................................................................
Figure B-14.
C-4American Sycamore............................................................................
Figure B-i15.
C-4Cow Parsnip...............................................................
Figure B-16.
i.....................
Figure B-17.
C-5C-ii  
Figure B-18.
~. NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i. Indian GrassFigure C-2. Yellow FoxtailC-1 NWMIVNWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-3. Goldenrod Figure C-4. White Heath AsterFigure C-5. Partridge PeaFigure C-6. English PlantainC-2  
Figure B-19.
... NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-7. Horseweed Figure C-8. Horse NettleFigure C-9. Field CressFigure C-10. White CloverC-3 NWI~AJNWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i1. Bull ThistleFigure C-12. American SycamoreC-4  
Figure B-20.
* ..,..N MIVINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-13. Cow ParsnipC-5 NWMI*.NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.C-6  
Figure B-21.
-NVV- mm~ ~C~ NWM1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix DQualitative Assessment Photographs and Location MapD-i NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure D-1.Figure D-2.Figure D-3.Figure D-4.Figure D-5.Figure D-6.Figure D-7.Figure D-8.Figure D-9.Figure D- 10.FIGURESRadioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed..  
Figure B-22.
.................
Figure B-23.
D- 1Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site.........................................
Figure B-24.
D-2Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site...................................
Transect 1 Looking West...................................................................... B-i Transect 1 Quadrat 1........................................................................... B-i Transect 1 Quadrat 2........................................................................... B-i Transect i Quadrat 3........................................................................... B-i Transect i Quadrat 4........................................................................... B-2 Transect 1 Quadrat S........................................................................... B-2 Transect i Quadrat 6........................................................................... B-2 Transect i Quadrat 7........................................................................... B-2 Transect 1 Quadrat 8........................................................................... B-3 Transect i Quadrat 9........................................................................... B-3 Transect i Quadrat 10.......................................................................... B-3 Transect 1 Looking East....................................................................... B-3 Transect 2 Looking Northeast................................................................. B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 1........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 2........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 3........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 4........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 5........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 6........................................................................... B-S Transect 2 Quadrat 7........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 8........................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Quadrat 9........................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Quadrat 10.......................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Looking Southwest................................................................ B-6 B-ii
D-2Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site .....................................
 
D-3Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site......................................
..,..NWM I NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-i. Transect 1 Looking West Figure B.-2. Transect 1 Quadrat 1 Figure B-3. Transect 1 Quadrat 2 Figure B-4. Transect 1 Quadrat 3 B-i
D-3Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site .............................................
 
D-4Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site................................................
~;NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-5. Transect 1 Quadrat 4 Figure B-6. Transect 1 Quadrat 5 Figure B-7. Transect 1 Quadrat 6 Figure B-8. Transect 1 Quadrat 7 B-2
D-4Facing Southwest from Center of Site..................................................
 
D-5Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site ...............................................
NWM I NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-9. Transect 1 Quadrat 8 Figure B-10. Transect 1 Quadrat 9 Figure B-11. Transect 1 Quadrat 10 Figure B-12. Transect 1 Looking East B-3
D-5Facing South from West Border of Site. ..............................................
 
D-6D-ii  
NW  
+....NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment
!YVMI NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-13. Transect 2 Looking Northeast Figure B-14. Transect 2 Quadrat 1 Figure B-15. Transect 2 Quadrat 2 Figure B-16. Transect 2 Quadrat 3 B-4
() Vqettin Aisornarnot Photopoints 3FF FacilityPr+i ,operty Bounda,,y Fence,,o+Figure D-1. Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations SurveyedD-1 C YMINWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessmentrnin gure u-I.Figure D-2. Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of SiteFigure D-3. Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of SiteD-2  
:....:.: NWMI
.°%%.* I.'oQ Oe'.: .=;== ?:-., *-. e,,.:
* o0 gO'*
NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment in rigure u-t.Figure D-4. Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of SiteFigure D-5. Facing Southwest from Near North Border on SiteD-3  
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-17. Transect 2 Quadrat 4 Figure B-18.
:""NWMIINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment ft) IllII lt /IFigure D-6. Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of SiteFigure D-7. Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site0-4 NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment mn rigure Li-I.Figure D-8. Facing Southwest from Center of Site#8 in Figure D-1.Figure D-9. Facing Southwest from South-Center of SiteD-5  
Transect 2 Quadrat 5 Figure B-19.
:'-,,.. NWMINWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0RPF Vegetation Assessment Y In ri gu~e Lu-I.Figure D-10. Facing South from West Border of SiteD-6 K EU in Nin mu** * *U*S*u**SE**
Transect 2 Quadrat 6 Figure B-20.
... *u5*TEESN REDWEET MED Al.NWMI-201 5-RAI-001 Rev. 0Appendix J -NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment J-i  
Transect 2 Quadrat 7 B-5
."=. NWMIP. -E~e.:o h O IWES7 MEDICAL SO'IEPESReport Cover SheetReport No: NWMI-2015-RPT-001 Revision No: 0Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Report Title:Project Title:NWMI Radioisotope Production FacilityStatus: LI In Process [] FinalContains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?
:": NWMI
Ll Yes []NoApprovals Review (R) andApproval (A) Printed Name Signature DateOriginator A J. Belier yj.i 10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)  
.'o@  
[] N/ARevision HistoryRev Date Revision Description Affected Pages0 10/1/2015 Initial Issue All This page intentionally left blank.
@O'.
0 O 0.*.O o eO.o.@ o O OS* 0*NWMINORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPESNorthwest Medical Isotopes, LLCRadioisotope Production FacilitySurrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0October 2015Prepared by:Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256Corvallis, OR 97330 This page intentionally left blank.
* %002; :
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLCRadioisotope Production FacilitySurrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0Date Published:
" -.o*. " NOIff14WI*ST IjEDIg*L ISOTOItIES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-21.
October 1, 2015Title: Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature:
Transect 2 Quadrat 8 Figure B-22.
C a z(J pJ  
Transect 2 Quadrat 9 Figure B-23. Transect 2 Quadrat 10 Figure B-24.
:":' NWMI*-SOJDPE.
Transect 2 Looking Southwest B-6
This page intentionally left blank.  
 
*!;"*.NWMINORthWEST MED CAL ISOIT pESNWMI-2015-RPT-O01, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment CONTENTS
i.JYYJ°A NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix C Plant Photographs C-i
 
.. *;-. IUlMAR I
,*eQ Oe'.
..,,... 11 VV IVll
. ::e,.:. amamMUT mnw* *som*s NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURES Figure C-i1.
Figure C-2.
Figure C-3.
Figure C-4.
Figure C-5.
Figure C-6.
Figure C-7.
Figure C-8.
Figure C-9.
Figure C-10.
Figure C-il.
Figure C-12.
Figure C-13.
Indian Grass.................................................................................... C-i1 Yellow Foxtail.................................................................................. C-i1 Goldenrod....................................................................................... C-2 White Heath Aster............................................................................. C-2 Partridge Pea.................................................................................... C-2 English Plantain................................................................................ C-2 Horseweed...................................................................................... C-3 Horse Nettle.................................................................................... C-3 Field Cress...................................................................................... C-3 White Clover.................................................................................... C-3 Bull Thistle..................................................................................... C-4 American Sycamore............................................................................ C-4 Cow Parsnip...............................................................
i..................... C-5 C-ii
 
~. NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i. Indian Grass Figure C-2. Yellow Foxtail C-1
 
NWMIV NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-3. Goldenrod Figure C-4. White Heath Aster Figure C-5. Partridge Pea Figure C-6. English Plantain C-2
 
... NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-7. Horseweed Figure C-8. Horse Nettle Figure C-9. Field Cress Figure C-10. White Clover C-3
 
NWI~AJ NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i1. Bull Thistle Figure C-12. American Sycamore C-4
 
*..,..N MIVI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-13.
Cow Parsnip C-5
 
NWMI*.
NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
C-6
 
-NVV-mm~ ~C~ *MI NWM1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix D Qualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map D-i
 
NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure D-1.
Figure D-2.
Figure D-3.
Figure D-4.
Figure D-5.
Figure D-6.
Figure D-7.
Figure D-8.
Figure D-9.
Figure D-10.
FIGURES Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed................... D-1 Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site......................................... D-2 Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site................................... D-2 Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site..................................... D-3 Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site...................................... D-3 Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site............................................. D-4 Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site................................................ D-4 Facing Southwest from Center of Site.................................................. D-5 Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site............................................... D-5 Facing South from West Border of Site............................................... D-6 D-ii
 
+....NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment
()
Vqettin Aisornarnot Photopoints 3FF Facility Pr+i  
,operty Bounda,,y Fence,,o
+
Figure D-1. Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed D-1
 
C YMI NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment
*1 rnin gure u-I.
Figure D-2. Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site Figure D-3. Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site D-2
 
.°%%.*
I
.'oQ Oe'.
:.=;==  
?:-., *
-. e,,.:
mom'at*T*r.Ju.Be'mPEs NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment in rigure u-t.
Figure D-4. Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site Figure D-5. Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site D-3
:""NWMII NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment ft) IllII lt  
/I Figure D-6. Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site Figure D-7. Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site 0-4
 
NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment mn rigure Li-I.
Figure D-8. Facing Southwest from Center of Site
#8 in Figure D-1.
Figure D-9. Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site D-5
:'-,,.. NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Y In ri gu~e Lu-I.
Figure D-10. Facing South from West Border of Site D-6
 
K EU in Nin mu
*U*S*u**SE**
*u5*
TEES N REDWEET MED Al.
NWMI-201 5-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix J -
NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment J-i
 
."=. NWMI P.  
-E~e.:o h O IWES7 MEDICAL SO'IEPES Report Cover Sheet Report No:
NWMI-2015-RPT-001 Revision No:
0 Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Report
 
==Title:==
Project
 
==Title:==
NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility Status:
LI In Process
[] Final Contains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?
Ll Yes
[]No Approvals Review (R) and Approval (A)
Printed Name Signature Date Originator A
J. Belier yj.i 10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass  
*7
*10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)
[] N/A Revision History Rev Date Revision Description Affected Pages 0
10/1/2015 Initial Issue All
 
This page intentionally left blank.
 
0 O
0.*
.O o eO.o.
o O OS 0* NWMI NORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPES Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 October 2015 Prepared by:
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC 815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256 Corvallis, OR 97330
 
This page intentionally left blank.
 
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 Date Published:
October 1, 2015
 
==Title:==
Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature: C a z(J pJ
:":' NWMI
*-SOJDPE.
This page intentionally left blank.
 
*!;"*.NWMI
"*Oe=0*
NORthWEST MED CAL ISOIT pES NWMI-2015-RPT-O01, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment CONTENTS


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
...........................................................................................
........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology......................................................................................... 1 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 2
11.1 Background..........................................................................................
 
11.2 Methodology.........................................................................................
==3.0 REFERENCES==
12.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT..........................................................................  
.............................................................................................. 3 APPENDICES Appendix A -
Assessment Photographs and Location....................................................... A-i


==23.0 REFERENCES==
*;-=. "NORTIWESTMEIJ CAt SOlAPES NWMI-2015-RPT-OO01, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment TERMS Acronyms 99Mo Discovery Ridge EPA GPS LEU NWMI RPF U.S.
molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research Park Environmental Protection Agency geographic positioning system low-enriched uranium Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC radioisotope production facility United States Units ha km hectare kilometer ii


..............................................................................................
NWoNW I205RP-,.
3APPENDICES Appendix A -Assessment Photographs and Location.......................................................
ev lvii RPFSurrounding Property Assessment 0RTHtWEST MEDlICAL IS OTflPES
A-i
*;-=. "NORTIWESTMEIJ CAt SOlAPESNWMI-2015-RPT-OO01, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment TERMSAcronyms99MoDiscovery RidgeEPAGPSLEUNWMIRPFU.S.molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research ParkEnvironmental Protection Agencygeographic positioning systemlow-enriched uraniumNorthwest Medical Isotopes, LLCradioisotope production facilityUnited StatesUnitshakmhectarekilometer ii
.: NWoNW I205RP-,.
evlvii RPFSurrounding Property Assessment
*..., 0RTHtWEST MEDlICAL IS OTflPES


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
This assessment consists of a qualitative survey that was conducted to evaluate the current state of the properties immediately surrounding the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)
Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. The qualitative survey evaluated the surrounding vegetation comrrunities, wetlands, and the presence of any wildlife.
This report describes the findings from the qualitative survey conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessment is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.


This assessment consists of a qualitative survey that was conducted to evaluate the current state of theproperties immediately surrounding the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. The qualitative survey evaluated the surrounding vegetation comrrunities,
==1.1 BACKGROUND==
: wetlands, and the presence of any wildlife.
NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum-99 (99Mo) using low-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery Ridge Research Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east of Kansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north of U.S. Highway 63.
This report describes the findings from the qualitative survey conducted September 30 and October 1,2015. The information collected from the assessment is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.1.1 BACKGROUND NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum-99 (99Mo) usinglow-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery RidgeResearch Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, BooneCounty, Missouri.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for the research and monitoring of ecosystems. Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systems that have similar vegetation, climate, geology, and physiology. The REP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located onl gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region was mostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). After European settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gently rolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh and Schroeder, 2002).
The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east ofKansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north ofU.S. Highway 63.The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for theresearch and monitoring of ecosystems.
1.2 METHODOLOGY The qualitative survey was performed by an inspector walking the surrounding properties of the RPF site.
Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systemsthat have similar vegetation,  
Photographed locations were recorded with a Trimble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS). A map and photographs are included in Appendix A. Wildlife species identified are discussed in the following section.
: climate, geology, and physiology.
1
The REP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located onl gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region wasmostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). AfterEuropean settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gentlyrolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh andSchroeder, 2002).1.2 METHODOLOGY The qualitative survey was performed by an inspector walking the surrounding properties of the RPF site.Photographed locations were recorded with a Trimble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS). Amap and photographs are included in Appendix A. Wildlife species identified are discussed in thefollowing section.1 CA SUPSRPF Surrounding Property Assessment 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT An inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northeast of the property.
 
The inspector observed Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana),
CA SUPSRPF Surrounding Property Assessment 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT An inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northeast of the property. The inspector observed Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota), Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta beliji), and Northern Pintail (Anas acuta) within the northwestern pond. These species are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015).
Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota)  
The inspector walked the wooded area south of the property to Gans Creek. The wooded area consisted of American Elm (Ulmus americana), Eastern Red Cedar (Junziperus virgin iana), Post Oak (Quercus stellate), Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis), and Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovate). At the time of the survey, Gans Creek was not flowing; however, the inspector did observe Creek Chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) in small pools within the creek channel. Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans blanchardi) and Eastern Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) were also observed in this area. These species are common in oak/hickory riparian habitat (MDOC, 2015).
, Painted Turtle(Chrysemys picta beliji),
The inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northwest of the property. The inspector observed Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota), Canada Goose (Branta Canadensis), Northern Pintail (Anas acuta),.and Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buceinator). This pond was also stocked with largemouth bass, catfish, and crappie by the Missouri Department of Conservation for recreational purposes. These species are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015). The birds species also indicate that the surrounding water bodies may be used by migratory birds. Appendix A provides photographs of the areas surveyed.
and Northern Pintail (Anas acuta) within the northwestern pond. These speciesare common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015).The inspector walked the wooded area south of the property to Gans Creek. The wooded area consisted of American Elm (Ulmus americana),
2
Eastern Red Cedar (Junziperus virgin iana), Post Oak (Quercusstellate),
 
Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis)  
RPFSurrounding Property Assessment
, and Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovate). At the time of thesurvey, Gans Creek was not flowing;  
: however, the inspector did observe Creek Chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) in small pools within the creek channel.
Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans blanchardi) and Eastern Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) were also observed in this area. Thesespecies are common in oak/hickory riparian habitat (MDOC, 2015).The inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northwest of the property.
The inspector observed Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota),
Canada Goose (Branta Canadensis),
Northern Pintail(Anas acuta),.and Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buceinator).
This pond was also stocked with largemouth bass, catfish, and crappie by the Missouri Department of Conservation for recreational purposes.
Thesespecies are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015). The birds species alsoindicate that the surrounding water bodies may be used by migratory birds. Appendix A providesphotographs of the areas surveyed.
2  
: : RPFSurrounding Property Assessment


==3.0 REFERENCES==
==3.0 REFERENCES==
: Chapman, S. S., Omernik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002,"Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, andphotographs):
Chapman, S. S., Omernik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002, "Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia," U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000), 2002.
Reston, Virginia,"
MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.
U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000),
Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.
2002.MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department ofConservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.3  
3
*,. .:.NORTIEWES MEDICA ISATOPESNWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment This page intentionally left blank.4  
 
,°..NWMNWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Appendix AAssessment Photographs and LocationA-i  
.:.NORTIEWES MEDICA ISATOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment This page intentionally left blank.
;..:; NWMI; MEDICAL SROTO PEDNWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-i1.Figure A-2.Figure A-3.Figure A-4.Figure A-5.Figure A-6.FIGURESRadioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed  
4
............
 
A-iNortheast Pond (View 1)......................................................................
,°..NWM NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Appendix A Assessment Photographs and Location A-i
A-2Northeast Pond (View 2)......................................................................
 
A-2Gans Creek (View 1)..........................................................................
;..:; NWMI
A-3Gans Creek (View 2)..........................................................................
;,..*-N0RFThWE*ST MEDICAL SROTO PED NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-i1.
A-3Northwest Pond ................................................................................
Figure A-2.
A-4A-ii l"; W IiNWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment
Figure A-3.
-I,=mlRPF Fac~ilityf BoundaryFedt~nce s+Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties SurveyedA-I NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-2. Northeast Pond (View 1)Figure A-3. Northeast Pond (View 2)A-2 i"'V N NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)A-3  
Figure A-4.
:"NWVMINWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0RPF Surrounding Property Assessment rIlCLUr¢ H Ill rlgulle Ix.-I.Figure A-6. Northwest PondA-4}}
Figure A-5.
Figure A-6.
FIGURES Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed............ A-i Northeast Pond (View 1)...................................................................... A-2 Northeast Pond (View 2)...................................................................... A-2 Gans Creek (View 1).......................................................................... A-3 Gans Creek (View 2).......................................................................... A-3 Northwest Pond................................................................................ A-4 A-ii
 
l";
W Ii NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment
-I,=ml RPF Fac~ilityf Pr*I*operty Boundary Fedt~nce s
+
Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed A-I
 
*:*NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-2. Northeast Pond (View 1)
Figure A-3. Northeast Pond (View 2)
A-2
 
i"'V N MI*;.
NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)
Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)
A-3
:"NWVMI NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment rIlCLUr¢ H Ill rlgulle Ix.-I.
Figure A-6. Northwest Pond A-4}}

Latest revision as of 06:23, 10 January 2025

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC - Document No. NWMI-2015-RAI-001, Revision 0, Appendix H. Part 8 of 14
ML15328A079
Person / Time
Site: Northwest Medical Isotopes
Issue date: 11/20/2015
From: Beller J
Northwest Medical Isotopes
To:
Northwest Medical Isotopes, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML15328A010 List:
References
NWMI-LTR-2015-005 NWMI-2015-RAI-001, Rev. 0
Download: ML15328A079 (71)


Text

APPENDIX F Credentials

ADAM J. WHITE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. White, a staff Environmental Scientist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo.

office, is responsible for conducting environmental services. He is responsible for the field services and development of reports for a wide range of projects performed. His primary environmental duties involve performance and report development for Phase I environmental site assessments, Phase II site assessments and remediation projects, wetland delineations, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews.

RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

  • Deer Valley Apartment, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) on a multi-family residential apartment complex for Prudential Mortgage Capital Company.
  • Colt Railroad, Columbia, Missouri Performed on-site soil sampling related to identifying petroleum and metals contaminated soils on the site.
  • Beatrice Cheese, New Hampton, Iowa Performed on-site remediatory supervision and site conditions monitoring associated with the remediation of petroleum contaminated soils on the site using subsurface injection methods.
  • Flat Branch Park Phase II, Columbia, MO.

Conducted data review and assisted with report developmernt for EPA Brownfield project associated with remediation of site impacted by former petroleum bulk storage facilities.

  • Cell Tower Sites, Missouri and Kansas Performed Phase I ESAs and NEPA assessments as they applied to the development associated with co-located and raw land tower sites for Verizon Wireless throughout Missouri and Kansas.
  • Agriculture Storage Facilities, Kansas Performed on-site soil, groundwater, and surface water sampling, at 10 agricultural fertilizer/pesticide facilities in Kansas.
  • Missouri Theatre, Columbia, Missouri Performed a Phase I ESA and report development for the renovation of the historic Missouri Theatre building. The site is located in downtown Columbia and was the former location of a drycleaner and printing facility.
  • Underground Storage Tank Removal, Moberly, Missouri Provided oversight, documentation, and sampling of contaminated soils during the excavation, removal, and closure of an underground petroleum storage tank.
  • Hy-Vee, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and on-site soil and groundwater sampling for proposed Hy-Vee grocery stores and gas station.
  • Agricultural Storage Facility, Trenton, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA and Missouri Department of Natural Resources EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Agricultural System Management, Minor Soil Science, 2005, University of Missouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS
  • OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Wetland Delineation Red Cross First Aid WORK HISTORY Terracon, Environmental Scientist, 2006-present; University of Missouri-Columbia, Soil Characterization Lab, 2006 06/05

White, Adam J. 2 (MDNR) file review for the historic agricultural chemical facility.

  • Hinton Little General Stores - Hinton, Missouri Conducted site characterization and risk based corrective action assessment consisting of soil and groundwater sampling of leaking underground storage tank site.
  • Autozone, Marshfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and MDNR file review on a vacant tract of land, historically the location of a gasoline station with leaking underground storage tanks.
  • Caterpillar Facility, Boonville, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA for a Caterpillar equipment manufacturing facility.

The facility was a large quantity generator that uses multiple

  • hazardous substances for operations at the site.
  • Prairie Queen, Centralia, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA on a gasoline station facility located in proximity to off-site gasoline stations.
  • AmerenUE, Callaway Nuclear Power Plant Preformed soil and groundwater sample collection for radiological parameters laboratory testing.

Sample collection locations include the highly secure Protected Area.

  • Hudson Hallow, Osage Beach, Missouri Provided consultation regarding on-site wetlands including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting.
  • City of Springfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESAs on six sites located in the historic Jordan Valley downtown area of Springfield, MO.
  • 401 S. Maple Avenue and 1057 Colfax Avenue, Hannibal, Missouri Provided PhaselI ESA on a screen printing business located adjacent to the former location of a manufactured gas plant.
  • Asbestos Air Sampling, Missouri Provided asbestos air sampling at sites which include churches, university dormitories, factories, and Bagnell Dam.

06105

MARK E. DIERKER FIELD GEOLO GIS T PROFESS IONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Dierker, a Field Geologist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo. office, is responsible for conducting environmental and geotechnical services. He is responsible for working with drilling crews performing field services, soil and groundwater sampling, and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs).

RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

  • Bright Start Academy, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as a child care facility.
  • Proposed Firestone, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as an autocare facility.
  • Father Tolton Catholic High School, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA for site to be developed as a high school.
  • Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Reform, Missouri Conducts groundwater sampling from monitoring well network and performs field services with monitoring well abandonment and well installations.
  • Con-Agg, LLC, Columbia, Missouri Quality control manager responsible for management of aggregate and concrete materials testing lab and quarry inventories.
  • Engineering Surveys and Services, Columbia, Missouri Performed field and laboratory testing of concrete, soils, and aggregate.

EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Geology, 2000, University of Missouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Nuclear Soil Gauge Certification Red Cross First Aid WORK HIS TORY Terracon Consultants, Inc.

Field Geologist, September 20 10-present Conn-Agg, LLC,Boone Quarries Quality Control Manager, January 2004 - August 2009 Engineering Surveys and Services, Materials Tech, April 2003-December 2003 06/05

TRACIE A. RAGLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Ms. Ragland has 9 years of general environmental experience. Ms.

Ragland performs various duties including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I ESAs), wetland delineations, asbestos inspections, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reviews. Ms. Ragland has also prepared Phase I ESAs in association with Brownfields Assessments and some Limited. Site Investigations (LSls). Her duties include client interaction; scheduling and/or performing project field work; interviews with site contacts, state, and local government officials; analytical interpretation of research databases and historical records; wetland plant and hydric soil identifications; interpretation and analysis of maps, aerial photographs, and soil surveys; wetland site survey coordination; calculation of wetland impacts; asbestos inspection and sampling; groundwater and soil collection and interpretation of laboratory analytical results; and preparation and production of client deliverables.

Ms. Ragland also has management responsibility of Phase I ESA projects within the Due Diligence Group (DDG) at Terracon. Duties include oversight of projects, assignment of projects, technical review of client deliverables, supervision of DDG members, and training of Phase I ESA personnel. Ms. Ragland has also served as Acting Group Manager of the DDG on several occasions.

PROFESSIONAL DUTIES

  • Phase I ESAs Conducted and managed over 300 Phase I ESAs for 9 years throughout the continental US, including undeveloped land, communications towers, multi-family residential structures, large-scale commercial developments, gasoline refueling stations, automobile repair facilities, industrial sites, printing facilities, dry cleaners, agricultural cooperative facilities, and US Postal Service Offices.
  • Wetland Delineations Conducts and manages wetland delineations and wetland permitting projects in KS and MO, including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and report preparation for Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting. Delineated sites from 1 to 8,000 acres.

Responsible for onsite wetland delineations utilizing mandatory technical criteria and field indicators established by the USACE and, when necessary, by the USDA (National Food Security Act Manual and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the US).

  • Asbestos Inspections and Sampling In conjunction with Phase I ESAs, conducts limited asbestos inspections and sampling of properties ranging from multi-family residential structures and commercial developments to heavy industrial sites in KS and MO.
  • NEPA ReviewslEnvironlmenltal Assessment (EA)

Conducted NEPA Reviews for existing and proposed communications towers and a fiber optic cable corridor, including an EA for a proposed marina at a USACE lake. Responsible for field work, contact with federal, state, and local government agencies, coordination of Cultural Resource Investigation for historical preservation clearance, and production of client 2/07 EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Honors in Environmental Studies, 1997, University of Kansas Bachelor of Science in Biology, Cellular Biology, 1992, University of Kansas CE RTI FICATI ONS 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Site Operations Training, 1999 AHERA Asbestos Inspector:

Kansas, Missouri, 1998 Category A Certification in Radioisotopes and Radiation Safety in Research, 1997 AFFILIATIONS Society of Wetland Scientists WORK HISTORY Terracon, Environmental Scientist, 1998-present University of Kansas, Research Assistant; 1994-1998 University of Minnesota, Graduate Research Assistant, 1993-1994 Oklahoma State University, Laboratory Technician, 1992-1993 ADDITIONAL COURSES Wetland Construction and Restoration, Wetland Training Institute, 2001 Wetland Plant Identification, Biotic Consultants, Inc., 2000 Basic Processes in Hydric Soils, North Carolina State University, 2000 38-Hour Army Corns of Engineers Wetland Delineation &

Management Training Program, Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc., 1998

RAGLAND, TRACIE A.

deliverables.

  • LSIs/Preliminary Assessment (PA)/Site Inspection (SI)

Conducted and managed LSls including a PA/SI on a former government WWII facility. Responsibilities included preparation of work scopes, collection of soil and groundwater samples, preparation of samples for shipment to a laboratory for analysis, interpretation of analytical results, and preparation of client deliverables.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Phase I ESAs

  • Falley's Food Stores - KS and MO (Associated Wholesale Grocers-Kansas City, KS)

Coordinated research database and historical records procurement, technical report editing, scheduling and/or performing field work, and assisting with report preparation for 25 Falley's Food stores.

  • Pizza Hut - Southeastern US (National Pizza Company International, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)

Coordinated and managed field work, technical report review and editing, and client deliverable production for 47 Pizza Hut facilities located across the southeastern US in 10 business days.

  • Montezuma Wind Farm - Montezuma, KS (Snyder and Associates, Inc.-Atlantic, IA)

Conducted field work, including a low-altitude aerial reconnaissance, and report preparation for a proposed windmill energy generating facility located on 8,000 acres of farmland in western KS.

  • Industrial Warehouses - Kansas City, MO and KS (Block Income Fund I, L.P.-Kansas City, MO)

A portfolio of 5 industrial warehouses containing multiple tenants totaling 390,000sf.

  • Martin Tractor Company - Topeka, KS (Martin Tractor Company-Topeka, KS)

A large-scale truck maintenance/service and parts testing and rebuilding facility, totaling 1~66,00sf,. With numerous aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), an oil burner, mud trap, paint room, former undergr.ound storage tanks (USTs), and multiple waste streams..

  • Plastic Packaging Technologies - Kansas City, KS (Stonehenge Partners, Inc.-Columbus, OH)-..

A 65,000sf facility associated with the production, printing, and distribution of roll stack packaging and plastic bags, with flexigraphic wide-web printing, solvent-less lamination operations, and a volatile organic compound emissions burner.

  • Mize Road - Lenexa, KS (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)

Proposed expansion and improvement of 1.5 to 2 miles of Mize Road and West 7 9 th Street in Lenexa, KS.

  • Sovereign Business Forms - Girard, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)

An 80,000sf facility associated with the printing, packaging, warehousing, and distribution of custom business forms, including the production of metal photo plates from film and negatives.

  • White Lakes Center-Topeka, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL).

A retail facility consisting of a 414,582sf mall, an 8,141sf former Penny's Automotive Service Center, a 2,750sf Burger King restaurant, and associated parking and drives.

  • Plant Property - St. Joseph, MO (Premium Pork, LLC-Lenexa, KS)

A 60-acre tract consisting of a chemical storage warehouse (former meat packing facility); pallet manufacturing company; truck maintenance facility and empty dumpster storage; vacant grass-covered land; farmland; and dilapidated hog pens.

  • Farmers Coop Sites - KS (Farmers Cooperative Association-Lawrence, KS) 7 Farmers Coop facilities in northeast KS which included: liquid/dry fertilizer plants, grain storage elevators, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, tire shops, feed mills, storage yards, bulk fuel storage AST facilities, a retail store, and filling station.

2 2/07

RAGLAND, TRACIE A.

  • Agricultural Chemical Facilities - KS and MO (United Agri Products-Greeley, CO) 15 agricultural chemical blending facilities in north central KS and northwest MO which included liquid/dry fertilizer plants, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, and maintenance shops.
  • Proposed County Buildings - Olathe, KS (Johnson County, KS-Olathe, KS) 5 city blocks in downtown Olathe, KS including parking areas and multiple commercial, government, and residential structures with extensive historical background.

Brownfields Revitalization Act Phase I ESAs

  • Former St. Joseph Power & Light Company - St. Joseph, MO (Heartland Foundation-St. Joseph, MO) 40,000sf general commodities warehouse facility.
  • Former Junction City Foundry Property - Junction City, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 41 acres consisting of a 106,000sf former electric heavy iron foundry structure, a vacant 1-story office building, an abandoned 2-story farmhouse, and outbuildings.
  • EBA Building - Topeka, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 2 acres consisting of a 60,000sf three-story medical office building and parking area.
  • 312 South Second Street-Atchison, KS (City of Atchison-Atchison, KS) 1.2-acre metals and plastics salvage yard.
  • Former Frisco Laboratory Building - Springfield, MO (City of Springfield-Springfield, MO) 15,000sf former railroad laboratory testing facility.

Limited Site Investigations/PNlSl

  • Hardesty Federal Complex - Kansas City, MO (US General Services Administration-Kansas City, MO)

Conducted PA and SI under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), including soil and groundwater analyses and lead sampling, at 7 structures on 18 acres, including a former clothing chemical pretreatment facility and indoor firing range. PA/SI reports reviewed and approved by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources.

  • USA Detergents - Harrisonville, MO (Pinnacle Capital Group-Philadelphia, PA)

Conducted groundwater and soil sampling near an abandoned UST. Conducted outfall sampling to establish baseline analytical data for use in the application of a wastewater/storm water discharge permit.

  • Commercial Retail Redevelopment - Overland Park, KS (Continental Consulting Engineers, Inc.-

Leawood, KS)

Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from surrounding former dry-cleaning and printing/photography facilities.

  • Night Club and Office Space - Kansas City, MO (MC Real Estate Services, Inc.-Kansas City, MO)

Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite gasoline tanks and surrounding former dry-cleaning, spray painting/auto repair, and filling station facilities.

  • Proposed Aldi - Lee's Summit, MO (Aldi, lnc.-Olathe, KS)

Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite towing/maintenance activities.

2/07

  • ;=e.NWM**

MEILS~OE NWM/-2 015-RAI-0O01 Rev. 0 Appendix I -

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment I-i

.,:NWMI S....:NOArhWEST MED CAL =SOTOPES Report Cover Sheet Report No:

NWMI-2015-RPT-002 Revision No:

0 Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility Report

Title:

Project

Title:

Status:

III In Process

[] Final Contains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?

D]Yes

[]No Approvals Review (R) and Approval (A)

Printed Name Signature Date Originator A

J. Belier y*

10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass Ct A4*p'~-"

10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)

[] N/A Revision History Rev Date Revision Description Affected Pages 0

10/1/2015 Initial Issue All

  • 1-

This page intentionally left blank.

O 0*e

  • e OO0O0 o S.
  • 0
  • NWM I NORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPES Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 October 2015 Prepared by:

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC 815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256 Corvallis, OR 97330

This page intentionally left blank.

.:.*. ;..., NWMI

  • =e*

oe'-

  • : e= " " NORTllWESTMEI)ICALI$OTOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 Date Published:

October 1, 2015

Title:

Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature:

  • 'J
!;'. ;!NWMI N

oo "EORThWESTMAED CA SOIpES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

  • ,,,.NERTAWESTMEDIICAL SOTUPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology..............................................................................

  • .......... 1 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT........................................................................ 2 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 4

4.0 ASSESSMENT

CONCLUSION........................................................................... 5

5.0 REFERENCES

.............................................................................................. 6 APPENDICES Appendix A -

Appendix B -

Appendix C -

Appendix D -

Table 1.

Table 2.

Transect Map................................................................................... A-i Quadrate Photographs.......................................................................... B-i Plant Photographs.............................................................................. C-i Qualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map................................... D-i TABLES Frequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site................... 2 Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site............ 3

@.Y.NW IV!
  • .o;.NURThWESTMED CALIOOE NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment TERMS Acronyms 99Mo Discovery Ridge EPA GPS LEU NWMI RPF U.S.

molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research Park Environmental Protection Agency geographic positioning system low-enriched uranium Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC radioisotope production facility United States Units ha kin m

2 in hectare kilometer meter square meter ii

. NW

,t,,*.NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 N'oAL Iea,:

RPF Vegetation Assessment

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This assessment consists of quantitative and qualitative vegetation surveys that were conducted to evaluate the current state of vegetation on the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)

Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. A quantitative vegetation assessment was conducted near the end of the growing season that collected frequency and density data.

This report describes the findings from the quantitative and qualitative assessments conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessments is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.

1.1 BACKGROUND

NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum 99 (99Mo) using low-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery Ridge Research Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east of Kansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north of U.S. Highway 63.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for the research and monitoring of ecosystems. Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systems that have similar vegetation, climate, geology, and physiology. The RFP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located on gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region was mostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). After European settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gently rolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh and Schroeder, 2002).

The proposed site is located in a developed industrial park that was historically used as cultivated cropland and pasture. The current vegetation at the site consists of mostly grasses reminiscent of open pastureland.

This report provides a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the vegetation currently on the site.

1.2 METHODOLOGY The quantitative assessment was performed with two randomly selected transects within the RPF site.

At each location, general areas were identified for transects. The exact transect starting location was then selected randomly by tossing a stake in the air. Each transect ending location was selected randomly by tossing a stake in the air and walking in the direction that the stake landed. Transect lengths were 50 meter (in). Transect ends were recorded with a Trimnble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS).

A map of the transect locations is included in Appendix A.

After transects were defined, sample plots were established at 5 m intervals along each transect. Sample plots were established with a 1 square meter (in 2) (0.5 m x 2 m) plot frame quadrat. To ensure that sample points wcrc sampled randomly, the starting point was chosen between 0 and 5 m, and then a random number between 0 and 20 was used to determine the meters to be taken perpendicular (alternating direction every 5 m) to the transect. Photographs of each quadrat are provided in Appendix B. Within each quadrat, data was collected for density and frequency.

The qualitative assessment was performed in conjunction with the quantitative assessment. The qualitative assessment involved identifying significant vegetation not specifically found in the plots. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in random transects across the property.

1

NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT Each transect was located using the method described in Section 1.0. Transect 1 was located on the southern portion and crossed the property from the east to the west. Transect 2 was located on the northern portion and crossed the property from the east to the north, diagonal from the Transect 1.

Plant species encountered during the quantitative assessment consisted mostly of non-native plants typically found in disturbed areas such as pastures and right-of-ways (MDOC, 2015). Photographs of encountered species during the quantitative and qualitative assessments are provided in Appendix C.

Encountered species that are not classified as non-native (White Heath Aster and Goldenrod) are commonly found throughout prairie/oak forest plant communities (MDOC, 2015).

Table 1 describes encountered species with frequencies of all of the species found on the site. Plant frequency is the percent of occurrence within each transect and represents the species for the entire site.

Table 1. Frequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site Indian Grass Crown Vetch Horse Nettle White Clover Tall Fescue Bull Thistle Sorghastrum nutans Securiger varia Solanum carolinense Trifolium repens Colium arundinaceum Cirsium vulgate Non-native Non-native Non-native No-atv Non-native Non-native 100 70 60 50 30 10 100 50 10 40 Species with the highest density on the property consist of Indian Grass (Sorghastrum nutans) and Yellow Foxtail (Setaria pumila) (Table 2). The species density is the number of plants/in2. Table 2 describes the species densities on the property. No Federal-or State-listed species were encountered during the quantitative assessment.

2

eOOt

.:.-..; WMI

  • ". eo
  • I*K3111WIE:*IIBICt&BOlI*PI*

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Table 2. Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site Bull Thistle Field Cress Horse Nettle Indian Grass White Clover Yellow Foxtail Cirsium vulgare Lepidium campestre Solanum carolinense Sorghastrum nutans Trifolium repens Setaria pumila Non-native 0.3 Non-native 1.4 Non-native 1.6 Non-native 113 I

Non-native 1.1 Non-native 9.6 0.7 0.7 116 5.9 3.8 3

  • .:,*t;' *.

I 11 NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0

?...¶EU w EilRPF Vegetation Assessment 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT Observations at the NWMI RPF site occurred on September 30 and October 1, 2015. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in random transects across the property. Photographs of the property were taken at various locations and are included in Appendix D, along with a map of the photographed locations. Photographs of notable plants species taken throughout the assessment are provided in Appendix C.

During the qualitative assessment, no Federal-or State-listed species were encountered. An American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) was encountered on the east side of the property. This tree species is commonly found through the state of Missouri and in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).

Other species encountered during the qualitative assessment and not the quantitative assessment include Cow Parsnip (Heracleaum lanatum), Partridge Pea (Cassia chamaecrista), and English Plantain (Plantago Lanceolata). Both of these species are common in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).

While conducting the qualitative assessment, the inspector did encounter approximately nine Eurasian Collared-Doves (Streptopelia decaocto). These birds are common and found statewide, typically using pastures, trees, or powerlines to roost. No other wildlife were encountered onsite during the qualitative or quantitative assessment.

4

!..~;:;i Ni~ aImu NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0

.*;: 1 D1ifif iI RPF Vegetation Assessment

4.0 ASSESSMENT

CONCLUSION The results of the quantitative or qualitative assessment did not identify any Federal-or State-listed species and/or species of concern. Based on observations onsite and of the surrounding areas, the vegetation found onsite is not unique to this location, and these species are commonly found on other sites throughout the region that have been used as cattle pasture.

5

.*'*. NW M~K I

NWM.-2o15-RPx-0o2, Rev. 0 EV o." *l RPF Vegetation Assessment

5.0 REFERENCES

Chapman, S. S., Omemik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002, "Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia," U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000), 2002.

MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.

Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.

6

.;,','.:MI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix A Transect Map A-i

="* NWMI

.'e oo',

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

A-ii

NWNMI NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Loca~on Map

..-

  • Vqetation Assesment TinhectI RPF Fidlity Property Boundary

,/X, Fence Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Transect Map A-1

NWMIJ~

NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

A-2

NWMI
  • eo oe'.
.%e?;,; *
.e.,.

ImmVCr.St" Iml*u.

  • NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)

Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)

A-3

""; NWMI
  • =0 Qe*.
%oo;:
o o;

P*DIN134VtlEs'r IIItlDgCAL R$

NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-6. Northwest Pond A-4

.!:*=:;. I*IYL I/II NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix B Quadrate Photographs B-i

i;NWAMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURES Figure B-i1.

Figure B-2.

Figure B-3.

Figure B-4.

Figure B-5.

Figure B-6.

Figure B-7.

Figure B-8.

Figure B-9.

Figure B-b1.

Figure B-ti1.

Figure B-12.

Figure B-13.

Figure B-14.

Figure B-i15.

Figure B-16.

Figure B-17.

Figure B-18.

Figure B-19.

Figure B-20.

Figure B-21.

Figure B-22.

Figure B-23.

Figure B-24.

Transect 1 Looking West...................................................................... B-i Transect 1 Quadrat 1........................................................................... B-i Transect 1 Quadrat 2........................................................................... B-i Transect i Quadrat 3........................................................................... B-i Transect i Quadrat 4........................................................................... B-2 Transect 1 Quadrat S........................................................................... B-2 Transect i Quadrat 6........................................................................... B-2 Transect i Quadrat 7........................................................................... B-2 Transect 1 Quadrat 8........................................................................... B-3 Transect i Quadrat 9........................................................................... B-3 Transect i Quadrat 10.......................................................................... B-3 Transect 1 Looking East....................................................................... B-3 Transect 2 Looking Northeast................................................................. B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 1........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 2........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 3........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 4........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 5........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 6........................................................................... B-S Transect 2 Quadrat 7........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 8........................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Quadrat 9........................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Quadrat 10.......................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Looking Southwest................................................................ B-6 B-ii

..,..NWM I NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-i. Transect 1 Looking West Figure B.-2. Transect 1 Quadrat 1 Figure B-3. Transect 1 Quadrat 2 Figure B-4. Transect 1 Quadrat 3 B-i

~;NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-5. Transect 1 Quadrat 4 Figure B-6. Transect 1 Quadrat 5 Figure B-7. Transect 1 Quadrat 6 Figure B-8. Transect 1 Quadrat 7 B-2

NWM I NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-9. Transect 1 Quadrat 8 Figure B-10. Transect 1 Quadrat 9 Figure B-11. Transect 1 Quadrat 10 Figure B-12. Transect 1 Looking East B-3

NW

!YVMI NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-13. Transect 2 Looking Northeast Figure B-14. Transect 2 Quadrat 1 Figure B-15. Transect 2 Quadrat 2 Figure B-16. Transect 2 Quadrat 3 B-4

....:.: NWMI
  • o0 gO'*

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-17. Transect 2 Quadrat 4 Figure B-18.

Transect 2 Quadrat 5 Figure B-19.

Transect 2 Quadrat 6 Figure B-20.

Transect 2 Quadrat 7 B-5

": NWMI

.'o@

@O'.

  • %002; :

" -.o*. " NOIff14WI*ST IjEDIg*L ISOTOItIES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-21.

Transect 2 Quadrat 8 Figure B-22.

Transect 2 Quadrat 9 Figure B-23. Transect 2 Quadrat 10 Figure B-24.

Transect 2 Looking Southwest B-6

i.JYYJ°A NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix C Plant Photographs C-i

.. *;-. IUlMAR I

,*eQ Oe'.

..,,... 11 VV IVll

. ::e,.:. amamMUT mnw* *som*s NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURES Figure C-i1.

Figure C-2.

Figure C-3.

Figure C-4.

Figure C-5.

Figure C-6.

Figure C-7.

Figure C-8.

Figure C-9.

Figure C-10.

Figure C-il.

Figure C-12.

Figure C-13.

Indian Grass.................................................................................... C-i1 Yellow Foxtail.................................................................................. C-i1 Goldenrod....................................................................................... C-2 White Heath Aster............................................................................. C-2 Partridge Pea.................................................................................... C-2 English Plantain................................................................................ C-2 Horseweed...................................................................................... C-3 Horse Nettle.................................................................................... C-3 Field Cress...................................................................................... C-3 White Clover.................................................................................... C-3 Bull Thistle..................................................................................... C-4 American Sycamore............................................................................ C-4 Cow Parsnip...............................................................

i..................... C-5 C-ii

~. NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i. Indian Grass Figure C-2. Yellow Foxtail C-1

NWMIV NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-3. Goldenrod Figure C-4. White Heath Aster Figure C-5. Partridge Pea Figure C-6. English Plantain C-2

... NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-7. Horseweed Figure C-8. Horse Nettle Figure C-9. Field Cress Figure C-10. White Clover C-3

NWI~AJ NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i1. Bull Thistle Figure C-12. American Sycamore C-4

  • ..,..N MIVI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-13.

Cow Parsnip C-5

NWMI*.

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

C-6

-NVV-mm~ ~C~ *MI NWM1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix D Qualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map D-i

NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure D-1.

Figure D-2.

Figure D-3.

Figure D-4.

Figure D-5.

Figure D-6.

Figure D-7.

Figure D-8.

Figure D-9.

Figure D-10.

FIGURES Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed................... D-1 Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site......................................... D-2 Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site................................... D-2 Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site..................................... D-3 Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site...................................... D-3 Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site............................................. D-4 Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site................................................ D-4 Facing Southwest from Center of Site.................................................. D-5 Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site............................................... D-5 Facing South from West Border of Site............................................... D-6 D-ii

+....NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment

()

Vqettin Aisornarnot Photopoints 3FF Facility Pr+i

,operty Bounda,,y Fence,,o

+

Figure D-1. Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed D-1

C YMI NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment

  • 1 rnin gure u-I.

Figure D-2. Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site Figure D-3. Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site D-2

.°%%.*

I

.'oQ Oe'.

.=;==

?:-., *

-. e,,.:

mom'at*T*r.Ju.Be'mPEs NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment in rigure u-t.

Figure D-4. Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site Figure D-5. Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site D-3

""NWMII NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment ft) IllII lt

/I Figure D-6. Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site Figure D-7. Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site 0-4

NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment mn rigure Li-I.

Figure D-8. Facing Southwest from Center of Site

  1. 8 in Figure D-1.

Figure D-9. Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site D-5

'-,,.. NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Y In ri gu~e Lu-I.

Figure D-10. Facing South from West Border of Site D-6

K EU in Nin mu

  • U*S*u**SE**
  • u5*

TEES N REDWEET MED Al.

NWMI-201 5-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix J -

NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment J-i

."=. NWMI P.

-E~e.:o h O IWES7 MEDICAL SO'IEPES Report Cover Sheet Report No:

NWMI-2015-RPT-001 Revision No:

0 Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Report

Title:

Project

Title:

NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility Status:

LI In Process

[] Final Contains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?

Ll Yes

[]No Approvals Review (R) and Approval (A)

Printed Name Signature Date Originator A

J. Belier yj.i 10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass

  • 7
  • 10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)

[] N/A Revision History Rev Date Revision Description Affected Pages 0

10/1/2015 Initial Issue All

This page intentionally left blank.

0 O

0.*

.O o eO.o.

o O OS 0* NWMI NORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPES Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 October 2015 Prepared by:

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC 815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256 Corvallis, OR 97330

This page intentionally left blank.

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 Date Published:

October 1, 2015

Title:

Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature: C a z(J pJ

":' NWMI
  • -SOJDPE.

This page intentionally left blank.

  • !;"*.NWMI

"*Oe=0*

NORthWEST MED CAL ISOIT pES NWMI-2015-RPT-O01, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology......................................................................................... 1 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 2

3.0 REFERENCES

.............................................................................................. 3 APPENDICES Appendix A -

Assessment Photographs and Location....................................................... A-i

  • -=. "NORTIWESTMEIJ CAt SOlAPES NWMI-2015-RPT-OO01, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment TERMS Acronyms 99Mo Discovery Ridge EPA GPS LEU NWMI RPF U.S.

molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research Park Environmental Protection Agency geographic positioning system low-enriched uranium Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC radioisotope production facility United States Units ha km hectare kilometer ii

NWoNW I205RP-,.

ev lvii RPFSurrounding Property Assessment 0RTHtWEST MEDlICAL IS OTflPES

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This assessment consists of a qualitative survey that was conducted to evaluate the current state of the properties immediately surrounding the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)

Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. The qualitative survey evaluated the surrounding vegetation comrrunities, wetlands, and the presence of any wildlife.

This report describes the findings from the qualitative survey conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessment is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.

1.1 BACKGROUND

NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum-99 (99Mo) using low-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery Ridge Research Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east of Kansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north of U.S. Highway 63.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for the research and monitoring of ecosystems. Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systems that have similar vegetation, climate, geology, and physiology. The REP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located onl gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region was mostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). After European settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gently rolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh and Schroeder, 2002).

1.2 METHODOLOGY The qualitative survey was performed by an inspector walking the surrounding properties of the RPF site.

Photographed locations were recorded with a Trimble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS). A map and photographs are included in Appendix A. Wildlife species identified are discussed in the following section.

1

CA SUPSRPF Surrounding Property Assessment 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT An inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northeast of the property. The inspector observed Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota), Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta beliji), and Northern Pintail (Anas acuta) within the northwestern pond. These species are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015).

The inspector walked the wooded area south of the property to Gans Creek. The wooded area consisted of American Elm (Ulmus americana), Eastern Red Cedar (Junziperus virgin iana), Post Oak (Quercus stellate), Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis), and Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovate). At the time of the survey, Gans Creek was not flowing; however, the inspector did observe Creek Chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) in small pools within the creek channel. Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans blanchardi) and Eastern Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) were also observed in this area. These species are common in oak/hickory riparian habitat (MDOC, 2015).

The inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northwest of the property. The inspector observed Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota), Canada Goose (Branta Canadensis), Northern Pintail (Anas acuta),.and Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buceinator). This pond was also stocked with largemouth bass, catfish, and crappie by the Missouri Department of Conservation for recreational purposes. These species are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015). The birds species also indicate that the surrounding water bodies may be used by migratory birds. Appendix A provides photographs of the areas surveyed.

2

RPFSurrounding Property Assessment

3.0 REFERENCES

Chapman, S. S., Omernik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002, "Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia," U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000), 2002.

MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.

Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.

3

.:.NORTIEWES MEDICA ISATOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

4

,°..NWM NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Appendix A Assessment Photographs and Location A-i

..
; NWMI
,..*-N0RFThWE*ST MEDICAL SROTO PED NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-i1.

Figure A-2.

Figure A-3.

Figure A-4.

Figure A-5.

Figure A-6.

FIGURES Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed............ A-i Northeast Pond (View 1)...................................................................... A-2 Northeast Pond (View 2)...................................................................... A-2 Gans Creek (View 1).......................................................................... A-3 Gans Creek (View 2).......................................................................... A-3 Northwest Pond................................................................................ A-4 A-ii

l";

W Ii NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment

-I,=ml RPF Fac~ilityf Pr*I*operty Boundary Fedt~nce s

+

Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed A-I

    • NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-2. Northeast Pond (View 1)

Figure A-3. Northeast Pond (View 2)

A-2

i"'V N MI*;.

NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)

Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)

A-3

"NWVMI NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment rIlCLUr¢ H Ill rlgulle Ix.-I.

Figure A-6. Northwest Pond A-4

APPENDIX F Credentials

ADAM J. WHITE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. White, a staff Environmental Scientist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo.

office, is responsible for conducting environmental services. He is responsible for the field services and development of reports for a wide range of projects performed. His primary environmental duties involve performance and report development for Phase I environmental site assessments, Phase II site assessments and remediation projects, wetland delineations, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews.

RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

  • Deer Valley Apartment, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) on a multi-family residential apartment complex for Prudential Mortgage Capital Company.
  • Colt Railroad, Columbia, Missouri Performed on-site soil sampling related to identifying petroleum and metals contaminated soils on the site.
  • Beatrice Cheese, New Hampton, Iowa Performed on-site remediatory supervision and site conditions monitoring associated with the remediation of petroleum contaminated soils on the site using subsurface injection methods.
  • Flat Branch Park Phase II, Columbia, MO.

Conducted data review and assisted with report developmernt for EPA Brownfield project associated with remediation of site impacted by former petroleum bulk storage facilities.

  • Cell Tower Sites, Missouri and Kansas Performed Phase I ESAs and NEPA assessments as they applied to the development associated with co-located and raw land tower sites for Verizon Wireless throughout Missouri and Kansas.
  • Agriculture Storage Facilities, Kansas Performed on-site soil, groundwater, and surface water sampling, at 10 agricultural fertilizer/pesticide facilities in Kansas.
  • Missouri Theatre, Columbia, Missouri Performed a Phase I ESA and report development for the renovation of the historic Missouri Theatre building. The site is located in downtown Columbia and was the former location of a drycleaner and printing facility.
  • Underground Storage Tank Removal, Moberly, Missouri Provided oversight, documentation, and sampling of contaminated soils during the excavation, removal, and closure of an underground petroleum storage tank.
  • Hy-Vee, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and on-site soil and groundwater sampling for proposed Hy-Vee grocery stores and gas station.
  • Agricultural Storage Facility, Trenton, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA and Missouri Department of Natural Resources EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Agricultural System Management, Minor Soil Science, 2005, University of Missouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS
  • OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Wetland Delineation Red Cross First Aid WORK HISTORY Terracon, Environmental Scientist, 2006-present; University of Missouri-Columbia, Soil Characterization Lab, 2006 06/05

White, Adam J. 2 (MDNR) file review for the historic agricultural chemical facility.

  • Hinton Little General Stores - Hinton, Missouri Conducted site characterization and risk based corrective action assessment consisting of soil and groundwater sampling of leaking underground storage tank site.
  • Autozone, Marshfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and MDNR file review on a vacant tract of land, historically the location of a gasoline station with leaking underground storage tanks.
  • Caterpillar Facility, Boonville, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA for a Caterpillar equipment manufacturing facility.

The facility was a large quantity generator that uses multiple

  • hazardous substances for operations at the site.
  • Prairie Queen, Centralia, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA on a gasoline station facility located in proximity to off-site gasoline stations.
  • AmerenUE, Callaway Nuclear Power Plant Preformed soil and groundwater sample collection for radiological parameters laboratory testing.

Sample collection locations include the highly secure Protected Area.

  • Hudson Hallow, Osage Beach, Missouri Provided consultation regarding on-site wetlands including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting.
  • City of Springfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESAs on six sites located in the historic Jordan Valley downtown area of Springfield, MO.
  • 401 S. Maple Avenue and 1057 Colfax Avenue, Hannibal, Missouri Provided PhaselI ESA on a screen printing business located adjacent to the former location of a manufactured gas plant.
  • Asbestos Air Sampling, Missouri Provided asbestos air sampling at sites which include churches, university dormitories, factories, and Bagnell Dam.

06105

MARK E. DIERKER FIELD GEOLO GIS T PROFESS IONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Dierker, a Field Geologist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo. office, is responsible for conducting environmental and geotechnical services. He is responsible for working with drilling crews performing field services, soil and groundwater sampling, and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs).

RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

  • Bright Start Academy, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as a child care facility.
  • Proposed Firestone, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as an autocare facility.
  • Father Tolton Catholic High School, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA for site to be developed as a high school.
  • Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Reform, Missouri Conducts groundwater sampling from monitoring well network and performs field services with monitoring well abandonment and well installations.
  • Con-Agg, LLC, Columbia, Missouri Quality control manager responsible for management of aggregate and concrete materials testing lab and quarry inventories.
  • Engineering Surveys and Services, Columbia, Missouri Performed field and laboratory testing of concrete, soils, and aggregate.

EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Geology, 2000, University of Missouri-Columbia CERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Nuclear Soil Gauge Certification Red Cross First Aid WORK HIS TORY Terracon Consultants, Inc.

Field Geologist, September 20 10-present Conn-Agg, LLC,Boone Quarries Quality Control Manager, January 2004 - August 2009 Engineering Surveys and Services, Materials Tech, April 2003-December 2003 06/05

TRACIE A. RAGLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Ms. Ragland has 9 years of general environmental experience. Ms.

Ragland performs various duties including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I ESAs), wetland delineations, asbestos inspections, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reviews. Ms. Ragland has also prepared Phase I ESAs in association with Brownfields Assessments and some Limited. Site Investigations (LSls). Her duties include client interaction; scheduling and/or performing project field work; interviews with site contacts, state, and local government officials; analytical interpretation of research databases and historical records; wetland plant and hydric soil identifications; interpretation and analysis of maps, aerial photographs, and soil surveys; wetland site survey coordination; calculation of wetland impacts; asbestos inspection and sampling; groundwater and soil collection and interpretation of laboratory analytical results; and preparation and production of client deliverables.

Ms. Ragland also has management responsibility of Phase I ESA projects within the Due Diligence Group (DDG) at Terracon. Duties include oversight of projects, assignment of projects, technical review of client deliverables, supervision of DDG members, and training of Phase I ESA personnel. Ms. Ragland has also served as Acting Group Manager of the DDG on several occasions.

PROFESSIONAL DUTIES

  • Phase I ESAs Conducted and managed over 300 Phase I ESAs for 9 years throughout the continental US, including undeveloped land, communications towers, multi-family residential structures, large-scale commercial developments, gasoline refueling stations, automobile repair facilities, industrial sites, printing facilities, dry cleaners, agricultural cooperative facilities, and US Postal Service Offices.
  • Wetland Delineations Conducts and manages wetland delineations and wetland permitting projects in KS and MO, including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and report preparation for Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting. Delineated sites from 1 to 8,000 acres.

Responsible for onsite wetland delineations utilizing mandatory technical criteria and field indicators established by the USACE and, when necessary, by the USDA (National Food Security Act Manual and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the US).

  • Asbestos Inspections and Sampling In conjunction with Phase I ESAs, conducts limited asbestos inspections and sampling of properties ranging from multi-family residential structures and commercial developments to heavy industrial sites in KS and MO.
  • NEPA ReviewslEnvironlmenltal Assessment (EA)

Conducted NEPA Reviews for existing and proposed communications towers and a fiber optic cable corridor, including an EA for a proposed marina at a USACE lake. Responsible for field work, contact with federal, state, and local government agencies, coordination of Cultural Resource Investigation for historical preservation clearance, and production of client 2/07 EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Honors in Environmental Studies, 1997, University of Kansas Bachelor of Science in Biology, Cellular Biology, 1992, University of Kansas CE RTI FICATI ONS 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Site Operations Training, 1999 AHERA Asbestos Inspector:

Kansas, Missouri, 1998 Category A Certification in Radioisotopes and Radiation Safety in Research, 1997 AFFILIATIONS Society of Wetland Scientists WORK HISTORY Terracon, Environmental Scientist, 1998-present University of Kansas, Research Assistant; 1994-1998 University of Minnesota, Graduate Research Assistant, 1993-1994 Oklahoma State University, Laboratory Technician, 1992-1993 ADDITIONAL COURSES Wetland Construction and Restoration, Wetland Training Institute, 2001 Wetland Plant Identification, Biotic Consultants, Inc., 2000 Basic Processes in Hydric Soils, North Carolina State University, 2000 38-Hour Army Corns of Engineers Wetland Delineation &

Management Training Program, Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc., 1998

RAGLAND, TRACIE A.

deliverables.

  • LSIs/Preliminary Assessment (PA)/Site Inspection (SI)

Conducted and managed LSls including a PA/SI on a former government WWII facility. Responsibilities included preparation of work scopes, collection of soil and groundwater samples, preparation of samples for shipment to a laboratory for analysis, interpretation of analytical results, and preparation of client deliverables.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Phase I ESAs

  • Falley's Food Stores - KS and MO (Associated Wholesale Grocers-Kansas City, KS)

Coordinated research database and historical records procurement, technical report editing, scheduling and/or performing field work, and assisting with report preparation for 25 Falley's Food stores.

  • Pizza Hut - Southeastern US (National Pizza Company International, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)

Coordinated and managed field work, technical report review and editing, and client deliverable production for 47 Pizza Hut facilities located across the southeastern US in 10 business days.

  • Montezuma Wind Farm - Montezuma, KS (Snyder and Associates, Inc.-Atlantic, IA)

Conducted field work, including a low-altitude aerial reconnaissance, and report preparation for a proposed windmill energy generating facility located on 8,000 acres of farmland in western KS.

  • Industrial Warehouses - Kansas City, MO and KS (Block Income Fund I, L.P.-Kansas City, MO)

A portfolio of 5 industrial warehouses containing multiple tenants totaling 390,000sf.

  • Martin Tractor Company - Topeka, KS (Martin Tractor Company-Topeka, KS)

A large-scale truck maintenance/service and parts testing and rebuilding facility, totaling 1~66,00sf,. With numerous aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), an oil burner, mud trap, paint room, former undergr.ound storage tanks (USTs), and multiple waste streams..

  • Plastic Packaging Technologies - Kansas City, KS (Stonehenge Partners, Inc.-Columbus, OH)-..

A 65,000sf facility associated with the production, printing, and distribution of roll stack packaging and plastic bags, with flexigraphic wide-web printing, solvent-less lamination operations, and a volatile organic compound emissions burner.

  • Mize Road - Lenexa, KS (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)

Proposed expansion and improvement of 1.5 to 2 miles of Mize Road and West 7 9 th Street in Lenexa, KS.

  • Sovereign Business Forms - Girard, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)

An 80,000sf facility associated with the printing, packaging, warehousing, and distribution of custom business forms, including the production of metal photo plates from film and negatives.

  • White Lakes Center-Topeka, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL).

A retail facility consisting of a 414,582sf mall, an 8,141sf former Penny's Automotive Service Center, a 2,750sf Burger King restaurant, and associated parking and drives.

  • Plant Property - St. Joseph, MO (Premium Pork, LLC-Lenexa, KS)

A 60-acre tract consisting of a chemical storage warehouse (former meat packing facility); pallet manufacturing company; truck maintenance facility and empty dumpster storage; vacant grass-covered land; farmland; and dilapidated hog pens.

  • Farmers Coop Sites - KS (Farmers Cooperative Association-Lawrence, KS) 7 Farmers Coop facilities in northeast KS which included: liquid/dry fertilizer plants, grain storage elevators, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, tire shops, feed mills, storage yards, bulk fuel storage AST facilities, a retail store, and filling station.

2 2/07

RAGLAND, TRACIE A.

  • Agricultural Chemical Facilities - KS and MO (United Agri Products-Greeley, CO) 15 agricultural chemical blending facilities in north central KS and northwest MO which included liquid/dry fertilizer plants, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, and maintenance shops.
  • Proposed County Buildings - Olathe, KS (Johnson County, KS-Olathe, KS) 5 city blocks in downtown Olathe, KS including parking areas and multiple commercial, government, and residential structures with extensive historical background.

Brownfields Revitalization Act Phase I ESAs

  • Former St. Joseph Power & Light Company - St. Joseph, MO (Heartland Foundation-St. Joseph, MO) 40,000sf general commodities warehouse facility.
  • Former Junction City Foundry Property - Junction City, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 41 acres consisting of a 106,000sf former electric heavy iron foundry structure, a vacant 1-story office building, an abandoned 2-story farmhouse, and outbuildings.
  • EBA Building - Topeka, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 2 acres consisting of a 60,000sf three-story medical office building and parking area.
  • 312 South Second Street-Atchison, KS (City of Atchison-Atchison, KS) 1.2-acre metals and plastics salvage yard.
  • Former Frisco Laboratory Building - Springfield, MO (City of Springfield-Springfield, MO) 15,000sf former railroad laboratory testing facility.

Limited Site Investigations/PNlSl

  • Hardesty Federal Complex - Kansas City, MO (US General Services Administration-Kansas City, MO)

Conducted PA and SI under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), including soil and groundwater analyses and lead sampling, at 7 structures on 18 acres, including a former clothing chemical pretreatment facility and indoor firing range. PA/SI reports reviewed and approved by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources.

  • USA Detergents - Harrisonville, MO (Pinnacle Capital Group-Philadelphia, PA)

Conducted groundwater and soil sampling near an abandoned UST. Conducted outfall sampling to establish baseline analytical data for use in the application of a wastewater/storm water discharge permit.

  • Commercial Retail Redevelopment - Overland Park, KS (Continental Consulting Engineers, Inc.-

Leawood, KS)

Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from surrounding former dry-cleaning and printing/photography facilities.

  • Night Club and Office Space - Kansas City, MO (MC Real Estate Services, Inc.-Kansas City, MO)

Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite gasoline tanks and surrounding former dry-cleaning, spray painting/auto repair, and filling station facilities.

  • Proposed Aldi - Lee's Summit, MO (Aldi, lnc.-Olathe, KS)

Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite towing/maintenance activities.

2/07

  • ;=e.NWM**

MEILS~OE NWM/-2 015-RAI-0O01 Rev. 0 Appendix I -

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment I-i

.,:NWMI S....:NOArhWEST MED CAL =SOTOPES Report Cover Sheet Report No:

NWMI-2015-RPT-002 Revision No:

0 Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility Report

Title:

Project

Title:

Status:

III In Process

[] Final Contains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?

D]Yes

[]No Approvals Review (R) and Approval (A)

Printed Name Signature Date Originator A

J. Belier y*

10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass Ct A4*p'~-"

10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)

[] N/A Revision History Rev Date Revision Description Affected Pages 0

10/1/2015 Initial Issue All

  • 1-

This page intentionally left blank.

O 0*e

  • e OO0O0 o S.
  • 0
  • NWM I NORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPES Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 October 2015 Prepared by:

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC 815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256 Corvallis, OR 97330

This page intentionally left blank.

.:.*. ;..., NWMI

  • =e*

oe'-

  • : e= " " NORTllWESTMEI)ICALI$OTOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 Date Published:

October 1, 2015

Title:

Radioisotope Production Facility Vegetation Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature:

  • 'J
!;'. ;!NWMI N

oo "EORThWESTMAED CA SOIpES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

  • ,,,.NERTAWESTMEDIICAL SOTUPES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology..............................................................................

  • .......... 1 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT........................................................................ 2 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 4

4.0 ASSESSMENT

CONCLUSION........................................................................... 5

5.0 REFERENCES

.............................................................................................. 6 APPENDICES Appendix A -

Appendix B -

Appendix C -

Appendix D -

Table 1.

Table 2.

Transect Map................................................................................... A-i Quadrate Photographs.......................................................................... B-i Plant Photographs.............................................................................. C-i Qualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map................................... D-i TABLES Frequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site................... 2 Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site............ 3

@.Y.NW IV!
  • .o;.NURThWESTMED CALIOOE NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment TERMS Acronyms 99Mo Discovery Ridge EPA GPS LEU NWMI RPF U.S.

molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research Park Environmental Protection Agency geographic positioning system low-enriched uranium Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC radioisotope production facility United States Units ha kin m

2 in hectare kilometer meter square meter ii

. NW

,t,,*.NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 N'oAL Iea,:

RPF Vegetation Assessment

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This assessment consists of quantitative and qualitative vegetation surveys that were conducted to evaluate the current state of vegetation on the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)

Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. A quantitative vegetation assessment was conducted near the end of the growing season that collected frequency and density data.

This report describes the findings from the quantitative and qualitative assessments conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessments is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.

1.1 BACKGROUND

NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum 99 (99Mo) using low-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery Ridge Research Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east of Kansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north of U.S. Highway 63.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for the research and monitoring of ecosystems. Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systems that have similar vegetation, climate, geology, and physiology. The RFP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located on gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region was mostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). After European settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gently rolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh and Schroeder, 2002).

The proposed site is located in a developed industrial park that was historically used as cultivated cropland and pasture. The current vegetation at the site consists of mostly grasses reminiscent of open pastureland.

This report provides a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the vegetation currently on the site.

1.2 METHODOLOGY The quantitative assessment was performed with two randomly selected transects within the RPF site.

At each location, general areas were identified for transects. The exact transect starting location was then selected randomly by tossing a stake in the air. Each transect ending location was selected randomly by tossing a stake in the air and walking in the direction that the stake landed. Transect lengths were 50 meter (in). Transect ends were recorded with a Trimnble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS).

A map of the transect locations is included in Appendix A.

After transects were defined, sample plots were established at 5 m intervals along each transect. Sample plots were established with a 1 square meter (in 2) (0.5 m x 2 m) plot frame quadrat. To ensure that sample points wcrc sampled randomly, the starting point was chosen between 0 and 5 m, and then a random number between 0 and 20 was used to determine the meters to be taken perpendicular (alternating direction every 5 m) to the transect. Photographs of each quadrat are provided in Appendix B. Within each quadrat, data was collected for density and frequency.

The qualitative assessment was performed in conjunction with the quantitative assessment. The qualitative assessment involved identifying significant vegetation not specifically found in the plots. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in random transects across the property.

1

NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT Each transect was located using the method described in Section 1.0. Transect 1 was located on the southern portion and crossed the property from the east to the west. Transect 2 was located on the northern portion and crossed the property from the east to the north, diagonal from the Transect 1.

Plant species encountered during the quantitative assessment consisted mostly of non-native plants typically found in disturbed areas such as pastures and right-of-ways (MDOC, 2015). Photographs of encountered species during the quantitative and qualitative assessments are provided in Appendix C.

Encountered species that are not classified as non-native (White Heath Aster and Goldenrod) are commonly found throughout prairie/oak forest plant communities (MDOC, 2015).

Table 1 describes encountered species with frequencies of all of the species found on the site. Plant frequency is the percent of occurrence within each transect and represents the species for the entire site.

Table 1. Frequency of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site Indian Grass Crown Vetch Horse Nettle White Clover Tall Fescue Bull Thistle Sorghastrum nutans Securiger varia Solanum carolinense Trifolium repens Colium arundinaceum Cirsium vulgate Non-native Non-native Non-native No-atv Non-native Non-native 100 70 60 50 30 10 100 50 10 40 Species with the highest density on the property consist of Indian Grass (Sorghastrum nutans) and Yellow Foxtail (Setaria pumila) (Table 2). The species density is the number of plants/in2. Table 2 describes the species densities on the property. No Federal-or State-listed species were encountered during the quantitative assessment.

2

eOOt

.:.-..; WMI

  • ". eo
  • I*K3111WIE:*IIBICt&BOlI*PI*

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Table 2. Species Density of Plant Species on the Radioisotope Production Facility Site Bull Thistle Field Cress Horse Nettle Indian Grass White Clover Yellow Foxtail Cirsium vulgare Lepidium campestre Solanum carolinense Sorghastrum nutans Trifolium repens Setaria pumila Non-native 0.3 Non-native 1.4 Non-native 1.6 Non-native 113 I

Non-native 1.1 Non-native 9.6 0.7 0.7 116 5.9 3.8 3

  • .:,*t;' *.

I 11 NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0

?...¶EU w EilRPF Vegetation Assessment 3.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT Observations at the NWMI RPF site occurred on September 30 and October 1, 2015. The qualitative assessment was completed by an investigator walking the perimeter of the property and in random transects across the property. Photographs of the property were taken at various locations and are included in Appendix D, along with a map of the photographed locations. Photographs of notable plants species taken throughout the assessment are provided in Appendix C.

During the qualitative assessment, no Federal-or State-listed species were encountered. An American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) was encountered on the east side of the property. This tree species is commonly found through the state of Missouri and in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).

Other species encountered during the qualitative assessment and not the quantitative assessment include Cow Parsnip (Heracleaum lanatum), Partridge Pea (Cassia chamaecrista), and English Plantain (Plantago Lanceolata). Both of these species are common in prairie/oak tree plant communities (MDOC, 2015).

While conducting the qualitative assessment, the inspector did encounter approximately nine Eurasian Collared-Doves (Streptopelia decaocto). These birds are common and found statewide, typically using pastures, trees, or powerlines to roost. No other wildlife were encountered onsite during the qualitative or quantitative assessment.

4

!..~;:;i Ni~ aImu NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0

.*;: 1 D1ifif iI RPF Vegetation Assessment

4.0 ASSESSMENT

CONCLUSION The results of the quantitative or qualitative assessment did not identify any Federal-or State-listed species and/or species of concern. Based on observations onsite and of the surrounding areas, the vegetation found onsite is not unique to this location, and these species are commonly found on other sites throughout the region that have been used as cattle pasture.

5

.*'*. NW M~K I

NWM.-2o15-RPx-0o2, Rev. 0 EV o." *l RPF Vegetation Assessment

5.0 REFERENCES

Chapman, S. S., Omemik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002, "Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia," U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000), 2002.

MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.

Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.

6

.;,','.:MI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix A Transect Map A-i

="* NWMI

.'e oo',

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

A-ii

NWNMI NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Loca~on Map

..-

  • Vqetation Assesment TinhectI RPF Fidlity Property Boundary

,/X, Fence Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Transect Map A-1

NWMIJ~

NWMI-2015--RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

A-2

NWMI
  • eo oe'.
.%e?;,; *
.e.,.

ImmVCr.St" Iml*u.

  • NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)

Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)

A-3

""; NWMI
  • =0 Qe*.
%oo;:
o o;

P*DIN134VtlEs'r IIItlDgCAL R$

NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-6. Northwest Pond A-4

.!:*=:;. I*IYL I/II NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix B Quadrate Photographs B-i

i;NWAMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURES Figure B-i1.

Figure B-2.

Figure B-3.

Figure B-4.

Figure B-5.

Figure B-6.

Figure B-7.

Figure B-8.

Figure B-9.

Figure B-b1.

Figure B-ti1.

Figure B-12.

Figure B-13.

Figure B-14.

Figure B-i15.

Figure B-16.

Figure B-17.

Figure B-18.

Figure B-19.

Figure B-20.

Figure B-21.

Figure B-22.

Figure B-23.

Figure B-24.

Transect 1 Looking West...................................................................... B-i Transect 1 Quadrat 1........................................................................... B-i Transect 1 Quadrat 2........................................................................... B-i Transect i Quadrat 3........................................................................... B-i Transect i Quadrat 4........................................................................... B-2 Transect 1 Quadrat S........................................................................... B-2 Transect i Quadrat 6........................................................................... B-2 Transect i Quadrat 7........................................................................... B-2 Transect 1 Quadrat 8........................................................................... B-3 Transect i Quadrat 9........................................................................... B-3 Transect i Quadrat 10.......................................................................... B-3 Transect 1 Looking East....................................................................... B-3 Transect 2 Looking Northeast................................................................. B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 1........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 2........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 3........................................................................... B-4 Transect 2 Quadrat 4........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 5........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 6........................................................................... B-S Transect 2 Quadrat 7........................................................................... B-5 Transect 2 Quadrat 8........................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Quadrat 9........................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Quadrat 10.......................................................................... B-6 Transect 2 Looking Southwest................................................................ B-6 B-ii

..,..NWM I NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-i. Transect 1 Looking West Figure B.-2. Transect 1 Quadrat 1 Figure B-3. Transect 1 Quadrat 2 Figure B-4. Transect 1 Quadrat 3 B-i

~;NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-5. Transect 1 Quadrat 4 Figure B-6. Transect 1 Quadrat 5 Figure B-7. Transect 1 Quadrat 6 Figure B-8. Transect 1 Quadrat 7 B-2

NWM I NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-9. Transect 1 Quadrat 8 Figure B-10. Transect 1 Quadrat 9 Figure B-11. Transect 1 Quadrat 10 Figure B-12. Transect 1 Looking East B-3

NW

!YVMI NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-13. Transect 2 Looking Northeast Figure B-14. Transect 2 Quadrat 1 Figure B-15. Transect 2 Quadrat 2 Figure B-16. Transect 2 Quadrat 3 B-4

....:.: NWMI
  • o0 gO'*

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-17. Transect 2 Quadrat 4 Figure B-18.

Transect 2 Quadrat 5 Figure B-19.

Transect 2 Quadrat 6 Figure B-20.

Transect 2 Quadrat 7 B-5

": NWMI

.'o@

@O'.

  • %002; :

" -.o*. " NOIff14WI*ST IjEDIg*L ISOTOItIES NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure B-21.

Transect 2 Quadrat 8 Figure B-22.

Transect 2 Quadrat 9 Figure B-23. Transect 2 Quadrat 10 Figure B-24.

Transect 2 Looking Southwest B-6

i.JYYJ°A NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix C Plant Photographs C-i

.. *;-. IUlMAR I

,*eQ Oe'.

..,,... 11 VV IVll

. ::e,.:. amamMUT mnw* *som*s NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment FIGURES Figure C-i1.

Figure C-2.

Figure C-3.

Figure C-4.

Figure C-5.

Figure C-6.

Figure C-7.

Figure C-8.

Figure C-9.

Figure C-10.

Figure C-il.

Figure C-12.

Figure C-13.

Indian Grass.................................................................................... C-i1 Yellow Foxtail.................................................................................. C-i1 Goldenrod....................................................................................... C-2 White Heath Aster............................................................................. C-2 Partridge Pea.................................................................................... C-2 English Plantain................................................................................ C-2 Horseweed...................................................................................... C-3 Horse Nettle.................................................................................... C-3 Field Cress...................................................................................... C-3 White Clover.................................................................................... C-3 Bull Thistle..................................................................................... C-4 American Sycamore............................................................................ C-4 Cow Parsnip...............................................................

i..................... C-5 C-ii

~. NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i. Indian Grass Figure C-2. Yellow Foxtail C-1

NWMIV NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-3. Goldenrod Figure C-4. White Heath Aster Figure C-5. Partridge Pea Figure C-6. English Plantain C-2

... NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-7. Horseweed Figure C-8. Horse Nettle Figure C-9. Field Cress Figure C-10. White Clover C-3

NWI~AJ NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-i1. Bull Thistle Figure C-12. American Sycamore C-4

  • ..,..N MIVI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure C-13.

Cow Parsnip C-5

NWMI*.

NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

C-6

-NVV-mm~ ~C~ *MI NWM1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Appendix D Qualitative Assessment Photographs and Location Map D-i

NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Figure D-1.

Figure D-2.

Figure D-3.

Figure D-4.

Figure D-5.

Figure D-6.

Figure D-7.

Figure D-8.

Figure D-9.

Figure D-10.

FIGURES Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed................... D-1 Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site......................................... D-2 Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site................................... D-2 Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site..................................... D-3 Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site...................................... D-3 Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site............................................. D-4 Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site................................................ D-4 Facing Southwest from Center of Site.................................................. D-5 Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site............................................... D-5 Facing South from West Border of Site............................................... D-6 D-ii

+....NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment

()

Vqettin Aisornarnot Photopoints 3FF Facility Pr+i

,operty Bounda,,y Fence,,o

+

Figure D-1. Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Locations Surveyed D-1

C YMI NWMI1-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment

  • 1 rnin gure u-I.

Figure D-2. Facing Northwest from Southeast Corner of Site Figure D-3. Facing Southwest from Near Northwest Corner of Site D-2

.°%%.*

I

.'oQ Oe'.

.=;==

?:-., *

-. e,,.:

mom'at*T*r.Ju.Be'mPEs NWMI-201 5-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment in rigure u-t.

Figure D-4. Facing Northeast from Near Southeast Corner of Site Figure D-5. Facing Southwest from Near North Border on Site D-3

""NWMII NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment ft) IllII lt

/I Figure D-6. Facing Northwest from Southeast Area of Site Figure D-7. Facing Northeast from South-Center of Site 0-4

NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment mn rigure Li-I.

Figure D-8. Facing Southwest from Center of Site

  1. 8 in Figure D-1.

Figure D-9. Facing Southwest from South-Center of Site D-5

'-,,.. NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-002, Rev. 0 RPF Vegetation Assessment Y In ri gu~e Lu-I.

Figure D-10. Facing South from West Border of Site D-6

K EU in Nin mu

  • U*S*u**SE**
  • u5*

TEES N REDWEET MED Al.

NWMI-201 5-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix J -

NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment J-i

."=. NWMI P.

-E~e.:o h O IWES7 MEDICAL SO'IEPES Report Cover Sheet Report No:

NWMI-2015-RPT-001 Revision No:

0 Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Report

Title:

Project

Title:

NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility Status:

LI In Process

[] Final Contains assumptions andlor inputs that require verification?

Ll Yes

[]No Approvals Review (R) and Approval (A)

Printed Name Signature Date Originator A

J. Belier yj.i 10/1/2015 Project Manager R/A C. Haass

  • 7
  • 10/1/2015 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)

[] N/A Revision History Rev Date Revision Description Affected Pages 0

10/1/2015 Initial Issue All

This page intentionally left blank.

0 O

0.*

.O o eO.o.

o O OS 0* NWMI NORTHWEST MEDICAL ISOTOPES Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 October 2015 Prepared by:

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC 815 NW 9th Aye, Suite 256 Corvallis, OR 97330

This page intentionally left blank.

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 Date Published:

October 1, 2015

Title:

Radioisotope Production Facility Surrounding Property Assessment Approved by: Carolyn Haass Signature: C a z(J pJ

":' NWMI
  • -SOJDPE.

This page intentionally left blank.

  • !;"*.NWMI

"*Oe=0*

NORthWEST MED CAL ISOIT pES NWMI-2015-RPT-O01, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology......................................................................................... 1 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 2

3.0 REFERENCES

.............................................................................................. 3 APPENDICES Appendix A -

Assessment Photographs and Location....................................................... A-i

  • -=. "NORTIWESTMEIJ CAt SOlAPES NWMI-2015-RPT-OO01, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment TERMS Acronyms 99Mo Discovery Ridge EPA GPS LEU NWMI RPF U.S.

molybdenum-99 Discovery Ridge Research Park Environmental Protection Agency geographic positioning system low-enriched uranium Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC radioisotope production facility United States Units ha km hectare kilometer ii

NWoNW I205RP-,.

ev lvii RPFSurrounding Property Assessment 0RTHtWEST MEDlICAL IS OTflPES

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This assessment consists of a qualitative survey that was conducted to evaluate the current state of the properties immediately surrounding the proposed Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)

Radioisotope Production Facility (RPF) site. The qualitative survey evaluated the surrounding vegetation comrrunities, wetlands, and the presence of any wildlife.

This report describes the findings from the qualitative survey conducted September 30 and October 1, 2015. The information collected from the assessment is used to describe the current vegetation conditions of the site.

1.1 BACKGROUND

NWMI proposes to construct and operate the RPF to commercially produce molybdenum-99 (99Mo) using low-enriched uranium (LEU). The proposed 3.0 hectare (ha) RPF site is situated within Discovery Ridge Research Park (Discovery Ridge), north of Discovery Ridge Drive in the city of Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is situated in central Missouri, approximately 201 kilometer (kin) east of Kansas City and 201 km west of St. Louis. The site is 7.2 km south of U.S. Interstate 70, just north of U.S. Highway 63.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a spatial network of ecoregions for the research and monitoring of ecosystems. Ecoregions are areas of relatively uniform ecological systems that have similar vegetation, climate, geology, and physiology. The REP site is located in the subregion Claypan Prairie of the Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion, which is characterized by well-developed claypan soils located onl gently rolling topography (Chapman et al., 2002). Historically, the region was mostly tall grass prairies with seasonally inundated wetlands (Nigh and Schroeder, 2002). After European settlement, the region experienced a conversion to cropland and pasture because of the gently rolling topography and soil with little natural vegetation remaining (Chapman et al., 2002; Nigh and Schroeder, 2002).

1.2 METHODOLOGY The qualitative survey was performed by an inspector walking the surrounding properties of the RPF site.

Photographed locations were recorded with a Trimble GeoXT geographic positioning system (GPS). A map and photographs are included in Appendix A. Wildlife species identified are discussed in the following section.

1

CA SUPSRPF Surrounding Property Assessment 2.0 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT An inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northeast of the property. The inspector observed Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota), Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta beliji), and Northern Pintail (Anas acuta) within the northwestern pond. These species are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015).

The inspector walked the wooded area south of the property to Gans Creek. The wooded area consisted of American Elm (Ulmus americana), Eastern Red Cedar (Junziperus virgin iana), Post Oak (Quercus stellate), Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis), and Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovate). At the time of the survey, Gans Creek was not flowing; however, the inspector did observe Creek Chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) in small pools within the creek channel. Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans blanchardi) and Eastern Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) were also observed in this area. These species are common in oak/hickory riparian habitat (MDOC, 2015).

The inspector walked the perimeter of the man-made pond to the northwest of the property. The inspector observed Green Frog (Rana clam itans melanota), Canada Goose (Branta Canadensis), Northern Pintail (Anas acuta),.and Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buceinator). This pond was also stocked with largemouth bass, catfish, and crappie by the Missouri Department of Conservation for recreational purposes. These species are common to wetland habitats throughout the state (MDOC, 2015). The birds species also indicate that the surrounding water bodies may be used by migratory birds. Appendix A provides photographs of the areas surveyed.

2

RPFSurrounding Property Assessment

3.0 REFERENCES

Chapman, S. S., Omernik, J. M., Griffith, G. E., Schroeder, W. A., Nigh, T. A., and Wilton, T. F., 2002, "Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia," U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,800,000), 2002.

MDOC, 2015, Missouri Department of Conservation Field Guide, http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide, accessed online October 1, 2015.

Nigh, T. A., and W. A. Schroeder, 2002, Atlas of Missouri Ecoregions, Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2002.

3

.:.NORTIEWES MEDICA ISATOPES NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment This page intentionally left blank.

4

,°..NWM NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Appendix A Assessment Photographs and Location A-i

..
; NWMI
,..*-N0RFThWE*ST MEDICAL SROTO PED NWMI-2015-RPT-OO1, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-i1.

Figure A-2.

Figure A-3.

Figure A-4.

Figure A-5.

Figure A-6.

FIGURES Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed............ A-i Northeast Pond (View 1)...................................................................... A-2 Northeast Pond (View 2)...................................................................... A-2 Gans Creek (View 1).......................................................................... A-3 Gans Creek (View 2).......................................................................... A-3 Northwest Pond................................................................................ A-4 A-ii

l";

W Ii NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment

-I,=ml RPF Fac~ilityf Pr*I*operty Boundary Fedt~nce s

+

Figure A-i. Radioisotope Production Facility Map of Surrounding Properties Surveyed A-I

    • NWMI NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-2. Northeast Pond (View 1)

Figure A-3. Northeast Pond (View 2)

A-2

i"'V N MI*;.

NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment Figure A-4. Gans Creek (View 1)

Figure A-5. Gans Creek (View 2)

A-3

"NWVMI NWMI-2015-RPT-001, Rev. 0 RPF Surrounding Property Assessment rIlCLUr¢ H Ill rlgulle Ix.-I.

Figure A-6. Northwest Pond A-4