ML16138A168: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16138A168
| number = ML16138A168
| issue date = 05/02/2016
| issue date = 05/02/2016
| title = Licensee Presentation Regarding Mur Power Uprate for Columbia Generating Station, Pending LAR (CAC No. MF7592)
| title = Licensee Presentation Regarding MUR Power Uprate for Columbia Generating Station, Pending LAR
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Energy Northwest
| author affiliation = Energy Northwest
| addressee name = Klos L J
| addressee name = Klos L
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1
| docket = 05000397
| docket = 05000397
| license number = NPF-021
| license number = NPF-021
| contact person = Klos L J
| contact person = Klos L
| case reference number = CAC MF7592
| case reference number = CAC MF7592
| document type = Meeting Summary, Slides and Viewgraphs
| document type = Meeting Summary, Slides and Viewgraphs
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Columbia Generating Station Pre-Submittal Meeting License Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)  
{{#Wiki_filter:Columbia Generating Station Pre-Submittal Meeting License Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)
Power Uprate May 2, 2016


Power Uprate May 2, 2016 EN Participants:Dave Kettering -
EN
Design Engineering ManagerAlex Javorik -
 
VP EngineeringDave Brown -System Engineering ManagerLisa Williams -Licensing SupervisorDan Moon -MUR Project Technical RepresentativeJim Brownell -MUR Project Manager 2
==Participants:==
AgendaBackgroundLicense Amendment Request (LAR) overviewLeading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)LAR scheduleConclusions Questions 3
Dave Kettering - Design Engineering Manager Alex Javorik - VP Engineering Dave Brown - System Engineering Manager Lisa Williams - Licensing Supervisor Dan Moon - MUR Project Technical Representative Jim Brownell - MUR Project Manager 2
 
Agenda


===Background===
===Background===
4Columbia PowerLevelsOriginal Licensed Thermal Power3323 MWtCurrent Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWtColumbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment LAR OverviewLAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power  
License Amendment Request (LAR) overview Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)
LAR schedule Conclusions Questions 3
 
===
Background===
4 Columbia Power Levels Original Licensed Thermal Power 3323 MWt Current Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWt Columbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment
 
LAR Overview LAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:
NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power Optimization, May 2003 ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM
'System, March 1997 ER-157P-A, Supplement to Caldon Topical Report ER-80P:
Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlus System, May 2008 5
 
LAR Overview (continued)
Completeness of information Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR request Contains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate Applications Incorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals 6
 
Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)
Cameron Check Plus' Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)
One on each feedwater line Uncertainty values determined by Alden Labs Commissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM 7
 
LEFM - Modes of Operation 8
LEFM Modes of Operation Power Level LEFM Uncertainty Both in Check Plus Normal operation at 3544 MWt 0.3%
One in Check Plus and one in Check OR Both in Check Return to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%
One or more in Fail Return to Check OR Reduce power to 3486 MWt N/A
 
LAR Schedule Outage implementation is preferred LAR Technical Review Complete Pre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016 Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016 Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016 Implement during refueling outage (R23) - starts 5/13/2017 Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017) 9
 
Conclusions Columbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changes All required information is included in LAR submittal Includes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10


Optimization, May 2003ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM
Questions or Feedback?
ŽSystem, March 1997ER-157P-A, Supplement to CaldonTopical Report ER-80P: Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlusSystem, May 2008 5
LAR Overview (continued)Completeness of information  Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR requestContains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate ApplicationsIncorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals 6
Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)Cameron Check PlusŽ Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)One on each feedwater lineUncertainty values determined by Alden LabsCommissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM 7 LEFM -Modes of Operation 8LEFM Modes of OperationPower Level LEFM UncertaintyBoth in Check PlusNormal operation at  3544 MWt 0.3%One in Check Plus andone in Check OR Both in CheckReturn to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%One or more in FailReturn to Check OR Reduce powerto 3486 MWt N/A LAR ScheduleOutage implementation is preferredLAR Technical Review CompletePre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016Implement during refueling outage (R23) -starts 5/13/2017Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017) 9 ConclusionsColumbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changesAll required information is included in LAR submittalIncludes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10 Questions or Feedback?
11}}
11}}

Latest revision as of 23:33, 9 January 2025

Licensee Presentation Regarding MUR Power Uprate for Columbia Generating Station, Pending LAR
ML16138A168
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 05/02/2016
From:
Energy Northwest
To: Klos L
Plant Licensing Branch IV
Klos L
References
CAC MF7592
Download: ML16138A168 (11)


Text

Columbia Generating Station Pre-Submittal Meeting License Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)

Power Uprate May 2, 2016

EN

Participants:

Dave Kettering - Design Engineering Manager Alex Javorik - VP Engineering Dave Brown - System Engineering Manager Lisa Williams - Licensing Supervisor Dan Moon - MUR Project Technical Representative Jim Brownell - MUR Project Manager 2

Agenda

Background

License Amendment Request (LAR) overview Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)

LAR schedule Conclusions Questions 3

=

Background===

4 Columbia Power Levels Original Licensed Thermal Power 3323 MWt Current Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWt Columbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment

LAR Overview LAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:

NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power Optimization, May 2003 ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM

'System, March 1997 ER-157P-A, Supplement to Caldon Topical Report ER-80P:

Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlus System, May 2008 5

LAR Overview (continued)

Completeness of information Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR request Contains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate Applications Incorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals 6

Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)

Cameron Check Plus' Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)

One on each feedwater line Uncertainty values determined by Alden Labs Commissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM 7

LEFM - Modes of Operation 8

LEFM Modes of Operation Power Level LEFM Uncertainty Both in Check Plus Normal operation at 3544 MWt 0.3%

One in Check Plus and one in Check OR Both in Check Return to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%

One or more in Fail Return to Check OR Reduce power to 3486 MWt N/A

LAR Schedule Outage implementation is preferred LAR Technical Review Complete Pre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016 Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016 Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016 Implement during refueling outage (R23) - starts 5/13/2017 Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017) 9

Conclusions Columbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changes All required information is included in LAR submittal Includes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10

Questions or Feedback?

11