ML16257A472: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML16257A472 | | number = ML16257A472 | ||
| issue date = 09/13/2016 | | issue date = 09/13/2016 | ||
| title = | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing | ||
| author name = Goetz S | | author name = Goetz S | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Goetz, Sujata Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:55 AM To: Jason R Haas Cc:Billerbeck, John; Tilton, Caroline; Wrona, David | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: | ||
Goetz, Sujata Sent: | |||
Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:55 AM To: | |||
Jason R Haas Cc: | |||
Billerbeck, John; Tilton, Caroline; Wrona, David | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review for License | Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No. MF8262) | ||
By {{letter dated|date=July 25, 2016|text=letter dated July 25, 2016}} (ADAMS accession No. ML16207A433), DTE electric company, submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Fermi 2. The proposed LAR would eliminate the Technical Specifications (TS), Section 5.5, Inservice Testing Program, to remove requirements duplicated in American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operations and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code), | |||
Testing (CAC No. MF8262) | Case OMN-20, Inservice Test Frequency. Also a new defined term, INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM, is added to TS Section 1.1, Definitions. | ||
By letter dated July 25, 2016 (ADAMS accession No. ML16207A433), DTE electric company, submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Fermi 2. The proposed LAR would eliminate the Technical Specifications (TS), Section 5.5, | The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Case OMN-20, | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | |||
plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in | |||
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Sujata Goetz Project Manager Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC/NRR/DORL/LP3-1 | Sujata Goetz Project Manager Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC/NRR/DORL/LP3-1 08C10 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (o) 301.415.8004 (fax) 301.415.3313 (fax) | ||
Mail Stop 08D15 | |||
Hearing Identifier: | |||
NRR_PMDA Email Number: | |||
Hearing Identifier: | 3052 Mail Envelope Properties (Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov20160913105400) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No. MF8262) | Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No. | ||
Sent Date: | MF8262) | ||
Sent Date: | |||
Recipients: | 9/13/2016 10:54:37 AM Received Date: | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | 9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM From: | ||
Goetz, Sujata Created By: | |||
Options | Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
"Billerbeck, John" <John.Billerbeck@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Tilton, Caroline" <Caroline.Tilton@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Wrona, David" <David.Wrona@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Jason R Haas" <haasj@dteenergy.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | |||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2149 9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM Options Priority: | |||
Standard Return Notification: | |||
No Reply Requested: | |||
No Sensitivity: | |||
Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 20:19, 9 January 2025
| ML16257A472 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 09/13/2016 |
| From: | Sujata Goetz Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Jonathan Haas DTE Energy Services |
| References | |
| MF8262 | |
| Download: ML16257A472 (2) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Goetz, Sujata Sent:
Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:55 AM To:
Jason R Haas Cc:
Billerbeck, John; Tilton, Caroline; Wrona, David
Subject:
Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No. MF8262)
By letter dated July 25, 2016 (ADAMS accession No. ML16207A433), DTE electric company, submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Fermi 2. The proposed LAR would eliminate the Technical Specifications (TS), Section 5.5, Inservice Testing Program, to remove requirements duplicated in American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operations and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code),
Case OMN-20, Inservice Test Frequency. Also a new defined term, INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM, is added to TS Section 1.1, Definitions.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sujata Goetz Project Manager Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC/NRR/DORL/LP3-1 08C10 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (o) 301.415.8004 (fax) 301.415.3313 (fax)
Mail Stop 08D15
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
3052 Mail Envelope Properties (Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov20160913105400)
Subject:
Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No.
MF8262)
Sent Date:
9/13/2016 10:54:37 AM Received Date:
9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM From:
Goetz, Sujata Created By:
Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Billerbeck, John" <John.Billerbeck@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Tilton, Caroline" <Caroline.Tilton@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Wrona, David" <David.Wrona@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Jason R Haas" <haasj@dteenergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2149 9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: