ML19276E077: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
{{#Wiki_filter:.
        .        . . .  . . .
4 VepCO
                                                                                                                                  .._        .                  . -
__. m c m c _ _ _ _. _ _. _ _. _
.
February 27, 1979 i
4 VepCO                                                                             __. m c m c _ _ _ _. _ _. _ _ . _
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Serial No. 456C Office Inspection & Enforcement
                                                                                                                                                                          -
.PSE&C/MLM:adw:mc U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission i
February 27, 1979                   ;
Region II Docket No. 50-339 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 3
      '
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
i .
Mr. James P. O'Reilly , Director                                                                                               Serial No. 456C
  ' '
Office Inspection & Enforcement                                                                                               .PSE&C/MLM:adw:mc                       :
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission                                                                                                                                     i Region II                                                                                                                       Docket No. 50-339 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100                                                                                                                                     3 Atlanta, Georgia 30303


==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
 
In accordance with 10CFR50.55(e), NRC Region II was notified on August i
In accordance with 10CFR50.55(e), NRC Region II was notified on August                                                                                         i 3,1978 that a field modification which was made to the reactor vessel in-sulation on North Anna Unit 2 had not been seismically analyzed.                                                                                                     [.
3,1978 that a field modification which was made to the reactor vessel in-sulation on North Anna Unit 2 had not been seismically analyzed.
Interim reports were submitted to NRC Region II on September 1, 1978 and                                                                                       f November 10,1978 (Serial No. 456A and 456B, respectively) stating that the                                                                                           ;
[.
i        clips which support the reactor vessel insulation may exert excessive forces on the incere instrumentation (ICI) tubes in the event of a worst case earth-                                                                                         :
Interim reports were submitted to NRC Region II on September 1, 1978 and f
quake. It .<as determined that as many as six ICI tubes may yield, but the structural integrity of the tubes would not be violated.                                                                                                             !
November 10,1978 (Serial No. 456A and 456B, respectively) stating that the i
( 1 Westinghouse and Stone & Webster have redesigned the reactor vessel in-sulation support structure to prevent overstressing of the ICI tubes. The structure ~ consists of a frame which supports the bottom reactor vessel insula-tion assembly. The frame is attached to the inside surface of the neutron shield                                                                                     '
clips which support the reactor vessel insulation may exert excessive forces on the incere instrumentation (ICI) tubes in the event of a worst case earth-quake.
tank. The loads from the insulation lower head are transmitted to the frame via clamping devices which attach the lower head insulation to the support frame. The                                                                                     :
It.<as determined that as many as six ICI tubes may yield, but the structural integrity of the tubes would not be violated.
clips presently attached to the ICI tubes which have caused the overstress condi-                                                                                     !
(
tion will be removed following installation of the new support frame. Unit 2 in-stallation will be completed prior to initial fuel load.                                                                                                             ;
1 Westinghouse and Stone & Webster have redesigned the reactor vessel in-sulation support structure to prevent overstressing of the ICI tubes. The structure ~ consists of a frame which supports the bottom reactor vessel insula-tion assembly. The frame is attached to the inside surface of the neutron shield tank. The loads from the insulation lower head are transmitted to the frame via clamping devices which attach the lower head insulation to the support frame. The clips presently attached to the ICI tubes which have caused the overstress condi-tion will be removed following installation of the new support frame.
We consider this to be the final report under the provisions of                                                                                                 .
Unit 2 in-stallation will be completed prior to initial fuel load.
10CFR50.55(e).               Please contact me if further infomation is required..                                                                                   '
We consider this to be the final report under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e).
Ver tru                   yours, Sam C.             rown Jr.
Please contact me if further infomation is required..
Senior Vice Presi ent - Power Station Engineering and Construction cc: Mr. John G. Davis, Acting Director                                                                                                             n Office of Inspection & Enforcement Q
Ver tru
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
: yours, Sam C.
                                                                                                                                                              @h\
rown Jr.
790302 02S/                                                                                                                                                 3
Senior Vice Presi ent - Power Station Engineering and Construction cc: Mr. John G. Davis, Acting Director n
  ;
Office of Inspection & Enforcement Q
a          misemi,,in,,,,--mm-min.umi-nei.im-m-.m= = - - -in.==emmhimumi ''m' ' '''' ' ' ' ' " " ' ' ' ' ' '          ''}}
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director
@h Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
\\
790302 02S/
3 a
misemi,,in,,,,--mm-min.umi-nei.im-m-.m= = - - -in.==emmhimumi
''m'
''}}

Latest revision as of 02:36, 3 January 2025

Final Rept Per 10CFR50.55(e),re Failure to Seismically Analyze Field Mod to Reactor Vessel Insulation.Westinghouse & Stone & Webster Changed Reactor Vessel Insulation Support Structure to Prevent Incore Instrumentation Tube Stress
ML19276E077
Person / Time
Site: North Anna 
Issue date: 02/27/1979
From: Brown S
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
456C, NUDOCS 7903020291
Download: ML19276E077 (1)


Text

.

4 VepCO

__. m c m c _ _ _ _. _ _. _ _. _

February 27, 1979 i

Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Serial No. 456C Office Inspection & Enforcement

.PSE&C/MLM:adw:mc U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission i

Region II Docket No. 50-339 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 3

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

In accordance with 10CFR50.55(e), NRC Region II was notified on August i

3,1978 that a field modification which was made to the reactor vessel in-sulation on North Anna Unit 2 had not been seismically analyzed.

[.

Interim reports were submitted to NRC Region II on September 1, 1978 and f

November 10,1978 (Serial No. 456A and 456B, respectively) stating that the i

clips which support the reactor vessel insulation may exert excessive forces on the incere instrumentation (ICI) tubes in the event of a worst case earth-quake.

It.<as determined that as many as six ICI tubes may yield, but the structural integrity of the tubes would not be violated.

(

1 Westinghouse and Stone & Webster have redesigned the reactor vessel in-sulation support structure to prevent overstressing of the ICI tubes. The structure ~ consists of a frame which supports the bottom reactor vessel insula-tion assembly. The frame is attached to the inside surface of the neutron shield tank. The loads from the insulation lower head are transmitted to the frame via clamping devices which attach the lower head insulation to the support frame. The clips presently attached to the ICI tubes which have caused the overstress condi-tion will be removed following installation of the new support frame.

Unit 2 in-stallation will be completed prior to initial fuel load.

We consider this to be the final report under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e).

Please contact me if further infomation is required..

Ver tru

yours, Sam C.

rown Jr.

Senior Vice Presi ent - Power Station Engineering and Construction cc: Mr. John G. Davis, Acting Director n

Office of Inspection & Enforcement Q

Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director

@h Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

\\

790302 02S/

3 a

misemi,,in,,,,--mm-min.umi-nei.im-m-.m= = - - -in.==emmhimumi

m'