ML19312C148: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML19312C148 | | number = ML19312C148 | ||
| issue date = 07/26/1976 | | issue date = 07/26/1976 | ||
| title = Supplies Revised Figures to | | title = Supplies Revised Figures to to NRC Re Effects of Postulated Spent Fuel Cask Drop Accident | ||
| author name = Parker W | | author name = Parker W | ||
| author affiliation = DUKE POWER CO. | | author affiliation = DUKE POWER CO. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 7912060716 | | document report number = NUDOCS 7912060716 | ||
| title reference date = 03-19-1976 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:) | ||
.\\ | |||
.\ | DUKE POWER COMPANY Powza Bun.Dtwo 422 Socra Cituacit Srazzi, Csunt.orTz N. C. asa4a w t LLI AM O. PA R M E R, J R. | ||
DUKE POWER COMPANY | V'CE PatsiOENT TELEPuoNE AmEA 704 p | ||
f Tra Pacouct'en 373-4083 | |||
V'CE PatsiOENT | / | ||
L] "aQ,k,%u.g ,6- | dI,.h L] "aQ,k,%u.g,6-July 26, 1976 I | ||
,,6, | |||
E4WS | .C] | ||
g u.5+ N 15 M | |||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Mr. Benard C. Rusche E4WS | ||
/ | |||
, A,j\\. | |||
a Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation v / /g j U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission g | |||
Washington, D. C. | |||
20555 Attention: | |||
Mr. A. Schwencer Re: Oconee Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-269, -270, -287 | |||
==Dear Mr. Rusche:== | ==Dear Mr. Rusche:== | ||
My {{letter dated|date=March 19, 1976|text=letter dated March 19, 1976}} provided information concerning the effects of a postulated spent fuel cask drop accident, including a description of the calculation performed to determine the maximum nunber of fuel assemblies affected and the corresponding dose at the exclusion area boundary. | |||
My letter dated March 19, 1976 provided information concerning the effects of a postulated spent fuel cask drop accident, including a description of the calculation performed to determine the maximum nunber of fuel assemblies affected and the corresponding dose at the exclusion area boundary. | |||
A review of this calculation has indicated that the number of affected assemblies should be increased from 73 to 76 assemblies. | A review of this calculation has indicated that the number of affected assemblies should be increased from 73 to 76 assemblies. | ||
This will raise the exclusion area boundary whole body dose to 8.5 Rem and the thyroid dose to 132.9 Rem. As can be seen, the radiological consequences of this postulated accident remain well with | This will raise the exclusion area boundary whole body dose to 8.5 Rem and the thyroid dose to 132.9 Rem. | ||
V | As can be seen, the radiological consequences of this postulated accident remain well with the established limits of 10CFR100. | ||
MST:vr | V truly yours, u-A William O. Parker, Jr. | ||
MST:vr 7668 79120607/f g}} | |||
Latest revision as of 01:26, 2 January 2025
| ML19312C148 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee |
| Issue date: | 07/26/1976 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Rusche B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912060716 | |
| Download: ML19312C148 (1) | |
Text
)
.\\
DUKE POWER COMPANY Powza Bun.Dtwo 422 Socra Cituacit Srazzi, Csunt.orTz N. C. asa4a w t LLI AM O. PA R M E R, J R.
V'CE PatsiOENT TELEPuoNE AmEA 704 p
f Tra Pacouct'en 373-4083
/
dI,.h L] "aQ,k,%u.g,6-July 26, 1976 I
,,6,
.C]
g u.5+ N 15 M
Mr. Benard C. Rusche E4WS
/
, A,j\\.
a Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation v / /g j U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission g
Washington, D. C.
20555 Attention:
Mr. A. Schwencer Re: Oconee Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-269, -270, -287
Dear Mr. Rusche:
My letter dated March 19, 1976 provided information concerning the effects of a postulated spent fuel cask drop accident, including a description of the calculation performed to determine the maximum nunber of fuel assemblies affected and the corresponding dose at the exclusion area boundary.
A review of this calculation has indicated that the number of affected assemblies should be increased from 73 to 76 assemblies.
This will raise the exclusion area boundary whole body dose to 8.5 Rem and the thyroid dose to 132.9 Rem.
As can be seen, the radiological consequences of this postulated accident remain well with the established limits of 10CFR100.
V truly yours, u-A William O. Parker, Jr.
MST:vr 7668 79120607/f g