ML19332A627: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
        .                                    .
    '
                                  .
Un.,
Un.,
                                                                                <                A'4 ns
A'4 ns
                          ,
... a
                                                                                  .. . a             -'
~bS k,i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 63 HUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION L
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 63   ~bS                k,i' HUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION           L   c.cp t 51980 *
c.cp t 51980
                                                                                    "'
* BEFORE THE ATCB'IC SAFETY AMD LICEI!SII!G ECA v
                                                                                            "          '
\\t,
BEFORE THE ATCB'IC SAFETY AMD LICEI!SII!G ECA                         -
p In the Biatter of
v           '
':,,o,
In the Biatter of                        :-                    \t ,                 ''
EOUSTOIT LIGHTING & POWER COMPAliY
p
+.
                                                        .
Docket IIo. 50-466~~
                                                                                    ':,,o ,   -
(Allens Creek liuclear Generating Station, Unit 1) j:
EOUSTOIT LIGHTING & POWER COMPAliY       +. Docket IIo . 50-466~~           -
September 10, 1980 REPLY-OF IUTERVEHORS SCHUESSLER, DOGGETT A:iD TexPIRG TO APPLICANT'S RESFO!!SE 20, AND STAFF'S MOTION TO STRIZE PORTIOiIS OF. EMERGE CY PLANNING COHTOITION Intervenors believe arguements of both Applicant and Staff totally ignore the following facts:
                                                        ..
1.
(Allens Creek liuclear Generating       ::
Original contentions TexPIRG A16.(d),(e), (f), (1) and A42; Doggett 5; and Schuessler 6 and 14 have been admitted as litigable issues 2.
Station, Unit 1)                         j:     September 10, 1980
Consolidated language attempts only to preserve those admitted issues 3.
    -
Consolidated language does not inject new issues nor does it enlarge on admitted issues 4.
REPLY-OF IUTERVEHORS SCHUESSLER, DOGGETT A:iD TexPIRG TO APPLICANT'S RESFO!!SE 20, AND STAFF'S MOTION TO
Since all issues have already been admitted, new language cannot raise challenge to Commission Rules 5.
* STRIZE PORTIOiIS OF. EMERGE CY PLANNING COHTOITION
Intervenors have simply complied fully with Order of Board Intervenors believe Applicant and Staff are attempting to appeal a ruling of the presiding officer, which is expressly pro-hibited by Part 2, Rules of Practice, Sec. 2.730 (f).
        .
If, despite all of above, the Board sees a genuine problem
Intervenors believe arguements of both Applicant and Staff totally ignore the following facts:
, in_use of consolidated language, Intervenors suggest that admitted contentions, as, written, remain in litigation to resolve problem.
: 1. Original contentions TexPIRG A16 .(d),(e), (f), (1) and A42; Doggett 5; and Schuessler 6 and 14 have been admitted as litigable issues
spectfully cubmitted, f
  .                2.     Consolidated language attempts only to preserve those admitted issues
CkuAa+'--
: 3.     Consolidated language does not inject new issues nor does it enlarge on admitted issues
Wm J. Sc..uessler Lead Party cc: To attached list, pb
: 4.     Since all issues have already been admitted, new language cannot raise challenge to Commission Rules
.S
: 5.     Intervenors have   simply complied fully with Order of Board Intervenors believe Applicant and Staff are attempting to appeal a ruling of the presiding officer, which is expressly pro-
/D 80.091605#
      '
k t
hibited by Part 2, Rules of Practice, Sec. 2.730 (f).
If, despite all of above, the Board sees a genuine problem                             l
          , in_use of consolidated language, Intervenors suggest that admitted contentions, as, written, remain in litigation to resolve problem.
spectfully cubmitted, f             CkuAa+'--
Wm J. Sc..uessler Lead Party cc: To attached list,                                               pb
                                                                                  .S
                                                          -
                                                                                  /D                       l 80.091605#
t                                   k


_.    - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ .
cc:
-                                                ..
J. Gregory Copeland, Esq.
      .
  .
cc: J. Gregory Copeland, Esq.
Carro Hinderstein David J. Preister, Esq.
Carro Hinderstein David J. Preister, Esq.
Hon. Jerry Sliva Hon. John R. Mikeska Mr. John F. Do.herty Mr. & Mrs. Robert S. Framson Mr. F. H. Potthoff, III D. Marrack Texas Public Interest Research Group, Inc.       ,
Hon. Jerry Sliva Hon. John R. Mikeska Mr. John F. Do.herty Mr. & Mrs. Robert S. Framson Mr. F. H. Potthoff, III D. Marrack Texas Public Interest Research Group, Inc.
Brenda A. McCorkle Mr. Wayne Rentfro Rosemary M. Lemmer Leotis Johnston Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Docketing and Service Section Hon. Ron Waters Margaret Bishop J. Morgan Bishop Stephen A. Doggett, Esq.
Brenda A. McCorkle Mr. Wayne Rentfro Rosemary M. Lemmer Leotis Johnston Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Docketing and Service Section Hon. Ron Waters Margaret Bishop J. Morgan Bishop Stephen A. Doggett, Esq.
Bryan L. Baker Robin Griffith Elinore P. Cummings
Bryan L. Baker Robin Griffith Elinore P. Cummings Mr. William Ferrenad Carolina Conn U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Reg. IV Stephen M. Schinki, Esq.
    -
\\
Mr. William Ferrenad Carolina Conn U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Reg. IV Stephen M. Schinki, Esq.
1 l
                                                                            \
        .
l 1
l l
i l
i l
l 1
l i
i l
                                                            .
j}}
j}}

Latest revision as of 03:18, 31 December 2024

Response in Opposition to NRC & Applicant Motions to Strike Portion of Emergency Planning Contention. Consolidated Language Does Not Incorporate New Issues
ML19332A627
Person / Time
Site: Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/1980
From: Doggett S, Schuessler W
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, DOGGETT, S.A., TEXAS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
ISSUANCES-CP, NUDOCS 8009160527
Download: ML19332A627 (2)
v • d • e


Text

.

Un.,

A'4 ns

... a

~bS k,i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 63 HUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION L

c.cp t 51980

  • BEFORE THE ATCB'IC SAFETY AMD LICEI!SII!G ECA v

\\t,

p In the Biatter of

':,,o,

EOUSTOIT LIGHTING & POWER COMPAliY

+.

Docket IIo. 50-466~~

(Allens Creek liuclear Generating Station, Unit 1) j:

September 10, 1980 REPLY-OF IUTERVEHORS SCHUESSLER, DOGGETT A:iD TexPIRG TO APPLICANT'S RESFO!!SE 20, AND STAFF'S MOTION TO STRIZE PORTIOiIS OF. EMERGE CY PLANNING COHTOITION Intervenors believe arguements of both Applicant and Staff totally ignore the following facts:

1.

Original contentions TexPIRG A16.(d),(e), (f), (1) and A42; Doggett 5; and Schuessler 6 and 14 have been admitted as litigable issues 2.

Consolidated language attempts only to preserve those admitted issues 3.

Consolidated language does not inject new issues nor does it enlarge on admitted issues 4.

Since all issues have already been admitted, new language cannot raise challenge to Commission Rules 5.

Intervenors have simply complied fully with Order of Board Intervenors believe Applicant and Staff are attempting to appeal a ruling of the presiding officer, which is expressly pro-hibited by Part 2, Rules of Practice, Sec. 2.730 (f).

If, despite all of above, the Board sees a genuine problem

, in_use of consolidated language, Intervenors suggest that admitted contentions, as, written, remain in litigation to resolve problem.

spectfully cubmitted, f

CkuAa+'--

Wm J. Sc..uessler Lead Party cc: To attached list, pb

.S

/D 80.091605#

k t

cc:

J. Gregory Copeland, Esq.

Carro Hinderstein David J. Preister, Esq.

Hon. Jerry Sliva Hon. John R. Mikeska Mr. John F. Do.herty Mr. & Mrs. Robert S. Framson Mr. F. H. Potthoff, III D. Marrack Texas Public Interest Research Group, Inc.

Brenda A. McCorkle Mr. Wayne Rentfro Rosemary M. Lemmer Leotis Johnston Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Docketing and Service Section Hon. Ron Waters Margaret Bishop J. Morgan Bishop Stephen A. Doggett, Esq.

Bryan L. Baker Robin Griffith Elinore P. Cummings Mr. William Ferrenad Carolina Conn U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Reg. IV Stephen M. Schinki, Esq.

\\

1 l

i l

l i

j

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19332A627&oldid=4744005"