ML19350E258: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:? | ||
June 12, 1981 File: NG-3514(B) | June 12, 1981 File: NG-3514(B) | ||
Serial No.: NO-81-1026 | |||
/ | |||
\\ | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | \\/a{ | ||
( :Ulil | |||
( | /6. | ||
Washington, D. C. 20555 | Y Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
comu ca | /C yg; 1 G 1931 >h I | ||
8 ATTENTION: | |||
Mr. T. A. Ippolito, Chief | |||
?E Operating Reactors Branch No. 2 g~, | |||
( | |||
, Q/ | |||
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. | |||
20555 | |||
\\ | |||
comu ca | |||
-\\,x o | |||
;D | |||
.''i[,<-:i\\'; | |||
BRUNSWICK STE?.M ELECTRIC PLANT UNIT NO. 2 | |||
.s DOCKET NO. 50-324 LICENSE NO. DPR-62 REQUEST FOR LICENSE AMENDMENT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - CONTAINMENT OXYGEN CONCENTRATION | |||
==Dear Mr. Ippolito:== | ==Dear Mr. Ippolito:== | ||
This letter is to confirm information provided to NRC in a June 12, 1981 conference call regarding the operational status of Brunswick Unit No. 2 and the existing situation relative to inerting contairsent. | This letter is to confirm information provided to NRC in a June 12, 1981 conference call regarding the operational status of Brunswick Unit No. 2 and the existing situation relative to inerting contairsent. | ||
(1) Brunswick-2 reached 15% power level at 10:45 p.m. on June 11, 1981. Technical Specifications require containment to be inerted by 10:45 p.m. on June 12. | (1) Brunswick-2 reached 15% power level at 10:45 p.m. on June 11, 1981. Technical Specifications require containment to be inerted by 10:45 p.m. on June 12. | ||
(2) Good progress has been made in installing the replace-ment oil-fired boiler which will be used to provide steam to vaporize nitrogen to inert containment. We expect to be able to light-off this boiler by about 1:00 p.m. on June 12, 1981. | (2) Good progress has been made in installing the replace-ment oil-fired boiler which will be used to provide steam to vaporize nitrogen to inert containment. We expect to be able to light-off this boiler by about 1:00 p.m. on June 12, 1981. | ||
(3) If boiler operation is satisfactory, inerting contain-ment would take approximately 10 - 12 hours. This is beyond the Technical Specification 6eadline cf 10:45 p.m. on June 12, 1981. | (3) If boiler operation is satisfactory, inerting contain-ment would take approximately 10 - 12 hours. This is beyond the Technical Specification 6eadline cf 10:45 p.m. on June 12, 1981. | ||
Ij;ool s | |||
ll0 1 | ll0 1 | ||
810 6 y 7 03Ao P | 810 6 y 7 03Ao P | ||
. = | |||
Mr. T.-A. Ippolito | 2-June 12, 1981 Mr. | ||
(4) As stated in the conference call, Carolina Power & | T.-A. | ||
Ippolito (4) As stated in the conference call, Carolina Power & | |||
Light Company (CP&L) is contident that inerting can be completed in a shorter time than requested in our June 11, 1981 submittal. CP&L agreed to reduce the requested exemption to 72 hours. | Light Company (CP&L) is contident that inerting can be completed in a shorter time than requested in our June 11, 1981 submittal. CP&L agreed to reduce the requested exemption to 72 hours. | ||
(5) With regard to fire protection considerations for operating in a deinerted condition, the plant fire brigade will be alerted to the degraded fire pro-tection cordition in containment. | (5) With regard to fire protection considerations for operating in a deinerted condition, the plant fire brigade will be alerted to the degraded fire pro-tection cordition in containment. | ||
Thank you for your effsres in this matter. | Thank you for your effsres in this matter. | ||
Yours very truly, CL) | Yours very truly, CL) - | ||
P. W. Howe Vice President Technical Services JAM /je (3948) 4 9 | P. W. Howe Vice President Technical Services JAM /je (3948) 4 9 | ||
4 y | 4 y | ||
w-.- y.-w+- y | w-.- | ||
y.-w+- | |||
y | |||
+, | |||
w v-m,, | |||
- mar w-- | |||
e w w*-r-r-- | |||
-,e--------+ | |||
'-=y-- | |||
-mme-- | |||
--s wwu r, | |||
-w- | |||
-e* | |||
v---*v | |||
--v v-+,e*r~---"-- | |||
r- | |||
--}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:14, 23 December 2024
| ML19350E258 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick |
| Issue date: | 06/12/1981 |
| From: | Howe P CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Ippolito T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NO-81-1026, NUDOCS 8106170210 | |
| Download: ML19350E258 (2) | |
Text
?
June 12, 1981 File: NG-3514(B)
Serial No.: NO-81-1026
/
\\
\\/a{
( :Ulil
/6.
Y Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/C yg; 1 G 1931 >h I
8 ATTENTION:
Mr. T. A. Ippolito, Chief
?E Operating Reactors Branch No. 2 g~,
(
, Q/
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555
\\
comu ca
-\\,x o
- D
.i[,<-:i\\';
BRUNSWICK STE?.M ELECTRIC PLANT UNIT NO. 2
.s DOCKET NO. 50-324 LICENSE NO. DPR-62 REQUEST FOR LICENSE AMENDMENT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - CONTAINMENT OXYGEN CONCENTRATION
Dear Mr. Ippolito:
This letter is to confirm information provided to NRC in a June 12, 1981 conference call regarding the operational status of Brunswick Unit No. 2 and the existing situation relative to inerting contairsent.
(1) Brunswick-2 reached 15% power level at 10:45 p.m. on June 11, 1981. Technical Specifications require containment to be inerted by 10:45 p.m. on June 12.
(2) Good progress has been made in installing the replace-ment oil-fired boiler which will be used to provide steam to vaporize nitrogen to inert containment. We expect to be able to light-off this boiler by about 1:00 p.m. on June 12, 1981.
(3) If boiler operation is satisfactory, inerting contain-ment would take approximately 10 - 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. This is beyond the Technical Specification 6eadline cf 10:45 p.m. on June 12, 1981.
Ij;ool s
ll0 1
810 6 y 7 03Ao P
. =
2-June 12, 1981 Mr.
T.-A.
Ippolito (4) As stated in the conference call, Carolina Power &
Light Company (CP&L) is contident that inerting can be completed in a shorter time than requested in our June 11, 1981 submittal. CP&L agreed to reduce the requested exemption to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
(5) With regard to fire protection considerations for operating in a deinerted condition, the plant fire brigade will be alerted to the degraded fire pro-tection cordition in containment.
Thank you for your effsres in this matter.
Yours very truly, CL) -
P. W. Howe Vice President Technical Services JAM /je (3948) 4 9
4 y
w-.-
y.-w+-
y
+,
w v-m,,
- mar w--
e w w*-r-r--
-,e--------+
'-=y--
-mme--
--s wwu r,
-w-
-e*
v---*v
--v v-+,e*r~---"--
r-
--