ML20024A077: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:..-
{{#Wiki_filter:.. -
                                          ^
^
                                                                                                  ?
?
UNITED STATES OF ' AMERICA                                                               b=
UNITED STATES OF ' AMERICA b
NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION 3,
NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION
5 ATOMIC SAFEIT AND LICENSING BOARD                                                           *
=
                                                                                                                                  +2 Mr. John H. Fry
3, 5
* III           . 00g{y" D Judge Stanley M. Livingsten         '
ATOMIC SAFEIT AND LICENSING BOARD
Dr. Frank F. Hooper                                                             [3 ;1 ML
+2 Mr. John H. Fry
                                                                          '83 JUN 13 P3:24 In the matter of n
* III 00g{y" D
[3 Judge Stanley M. Livingsten
;1 Dr. Frank F. Hooper ML
{
{
ge CINCINNATI GAS AND ELECTRIC
'83 JUN 13 P3:24 In the matter of ge CINCINNATI GAS AND ELECTRIC n
* 1, .:M' t:E 00MPANY, ET AL,                               ;                              .. SERV i'                           f=4 (William H. Zimmer Nuclear                             DOCKET NO. 50-538~ MCM                                            ~~-
1,.:M' t:E 00MPANY, ET AL, DOCKET NO. 50-538~ MCM
Power Statian)                                                                                                       e DOCKET NUMBER                         .
~~-
PR O D. & UTIL. FAC.. . . . . .w . . . . :55I         '
.. SERV i' f=4 (William H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Statian) e DOCKET NUMBER PR O D. & UTIL. FAC.......w........
                                                                                                                            ==
:55I
!                                                                                                                          +:===
 
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITfED AMICUS B                                                   ,
==
June 10,1983                                                         p.
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITfED AMICUS B
+:===
June 10,1983 p.
r--
r--
6 he Cumberland Chapter of the Sierra Club requests an extension of time to fits its previously submitted, Amicus Curiae Brief from the Cumberland Chapter.
he Cumberland Chapter of the Sierra Club requests an extension of time to N
N 3..
6 fits its previously submitted, Amicus Curiae Brief from the Cumberland Chapter.
cf the Sierrg ,gub Supporting the Miami Valley Power Project's Renewei Attempt L.---
cf the Sierrg,gub Supporting the Miami Valley Power Project's Renewei Attempt 3..
to Obtain Atpmi,e Safety and Licensing Board Hearings on Eight Quality Assurance contentions. w reasons for this request are
to Obtain Atpmi,e Safety and Licensing Board Hearings on Eight Quality Assurance L.---
: 1) he brief was mistaken 1[ filed early because a) the organization's representative en nuclear issues was not f*=414=r with the specific le6al require-                                                 #
contentions. w reasons for this request are
monts for dates of filing support briefs ani b) was called out of town before the petitionit was       filed sothe wasfiling.ef out of touch   with the Government Accountability Project                 Fi"";
: 1) he brief was mistaken 1[ filed early because a) the organization's representative en nuclear issues was not f*=414=r with the specific le6al require-monts for dates of filing support briefs ani b) was called out of town before the Fi petition was filed so was out of touch with the Government Accountability Project when it postponed the filing.ef the petition.
when       postponed                     the petition.                                                     :
" ~ " ~
                                                                                                                " ~ " ~
.4 s
s              .4 l              2) he brief is a statement of support Tather than an origimi arguent.                           P Werefore, filing the brief late would not prejuiice -the -interests of concerned pLrties. W ere is nothing new in the brief for them to answer.                                                 -- -
: 2) he brief is a statement of support Tather than an origimi arguent.
                                                                                                                                - ~ ~
P Werefore, filing the brief late would not prejuiice -the -interests of concerned l
                    '                                                                                          ^"
pLrties. W ere is nothing new in the brief for them to answer.
he CLtaberlani Chapter of'the. Sierra Club reques%in addition,- that its l previous submission be refiled en' granting of/the motion.                                                                       _
- ~ ~
                                                                                                                                    ^
^"
he CLtaberlani Chapter of'the. Sierra Club reques%in addition,- that its previous submission be refiled en' granting of/the motion.
l
l
                                                                                                                =&
^
l
=&
l i:.
l i:.
l                                                                                                             [::==. ==:
l
[::==.==:
k..
k..
y..
y..
j...
j...
                                                                                                                    =: :
=: :
8306150384 830610                                                                                             3
8306150384 830610 3
{DRADOCK 05000358                                                                             g               55 5 PDR
{DRADOCK 05000358 g
                                                                                                ,  &)
55 5
J 3
&)
                                                                                                                = . = = =
PDR 3
                                                                                                                            , - - :,}}
J
..=. = = =
, - - :,}}

Latest revision as of 00:52, 21 December 2024

Motion of Cumberland Chapter of Sierra Club for Extension to File Previously Submitted Amicus Curiae Brief Supporting Miami Valley Power Project Renewed Attempt to Obtain Hearings on Eight QA Contentions
ML20024A077
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 06/10/1983
From:
Sierra Club
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20024A078 List:
References
NUDOCS 8306150384
Download: ML20024A077 (1)


Text

.. -

^

?

UNITED STATES OF ' AMERICA b

NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION

=

3, 5

ATOMIC SAFEIT AND LICENSING BOARD

+2 Mr. John H. Fry

  • III 00g{y" D

[3 Judge Stanley M. Livingsten

1 Dr. Frank F. Hooper ML

{

'83 JUN 13 P3:24 In the matter of ge CINCINNATI GAS AND ELECTRIC n

1,.:M' t:E 00MPANY, ET AL, DOCKET NO. 50-538~ MCM

~~-

.. SERV i' f=4 (William H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Statian) e DOCKET NUMBER PR O D. & UTIL. FAC.......w........

55I

==

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITfED AMICUS B

+:===

June 10,1983 p.

r--

he Cumberland Chapter of the Sierra Club requests an extension of time to N

6 fits its previously submitted, Amicus Curiae Brief from the Cumberland Chapter.

cf the Sierrg,gub Supporting the Miami Valley Power Project's Renewei Attempt 3..

to Obtain Atpmi,e Safety and Licensing Board Hearings on Eight Quality Assurance L.---

contentions. w reasons for this request are

1) he brief was mistaken 1[ filed early because a) the organization's representative en nuclear issues was not f*=414=r with the specific le6al require-monts for dates of filing support briefs ani b) was called out of town before the Fi petition was filed so was out of touch with the Government Accountability Project when it postponed the filing.ef the petition.

" ~ " ~

.4 s

2) he brief is a statement of support Tather than an origimi arguent.

P Werefore, filing the brief late would not prejuiice -the -interests of concerned l

pLrties. W ere is nothing new in the brief for them to answer.

- ~ ~

^"

he CLtaberlani Chapter of'the. Sierra Club reques%in addition,- that its previous submission be refiled en' granting of/the motion.

l

^

l

=&

l i:.

l

[::==.==:

k..

y..

j...

=: :

8306150384 830610 3

{DRADOCK 05000358 g

55 5

&)

PDR 3

J

..=. = = =

, - - :,