ML20051H619: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:l o | ||
l | to e | ||
[ 5: | |||
o x | |||
n 3 e | o BOSTON EDIBON COMPANY o..................... | ||
q ..y ,O | n 3 e g | ||
q | |||
..y | |||
,O C | |||
d, j | |||
4.v. wonia, MANAurR May 11,1982 | |||
'tr | |||
{ | |||
p# | |||
uuctran arraArios uppo=r ora ^aracar 6 | |||
BECo. Ltr. #82-119 Mr. Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. | |||
20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 | |||
==Reference:== | ==Reference:== | ||
(A) Order of Modification of License | (A) Order of Modification of License | ||
~(Mark I Program, dated January 19, 1982 (B) Telephone conversation between Mr. K. Eccleston (NRC) and Mr. | |||
J. D. Keyes (Boston Edison) on April 27,1982 | J. D. Keyes (Boston Edison) on April 27,1982 | ||
| Line 34: | Line 43: | ||
==Dear Sir:== | ==Dear Sir:== | ||
This submittal is to document an extension request made in Reference (B). | |||
This submittal is to document an extension request made in Reference (B). | In the cover letter of Reference (A), it is stated that Boston Edison shall submit the Plant Unique Analysis "in accordance with the schedule provided in (the) 198171 ark 1%ners' Group Status Summary Report or as subsequently agreed upon by you and the staff". | ||
We intended that our submittal would be made in April,1982. However, Teledyne, the A/E we engaged for the Mark I Program, has informed us that the preparation and review of this Analysis will require more time than originally anticipated. | We intended that our submittal would be made in April,1982. However, Teledyne, the A/E we engaged for the Mark I Program, has informed us that the preparation and review of this Analysis will require more time than originally anticipated. | ||
The current projection by Teledyne in" :tes that we will be able to submit the analysis, with the exception of torus attached piping and items related thereto, by September, 1982. A specific submittal date for the analysis concerning the torus attached piping and related items is being developed, and will be the subject of a supplement to this request. | The current projection by Teledyne in" :tes that we will be able to submit the analysis, with the exception of torus attached piping and items related thereto, by September, 1982. A specific submittal date for the analysis concerning the torus attached piping and related items is being developed, and will be the subject of a supplement to this request. | ||
Boston Edison Co. believes that the Mark I tasks which we have alseady completed have substantially improved the margins of safety of the containment systems. We believe for this reason that good cause exists for the extension of the Plant Unique Analysis submittal deadline. | Boston Edison Co. believes that the Mark I tasks which we have alseady completed have substantially improved the margins of safety of the containment systems. We believe for this reason that good cause exists for the extension of the Plant Unique Analysis submittal deadline. | ||
lcaC c 8205170SOf | lcaC c | ||
8205170SOf to | |||
'l BOSTON E~o 5 0 N COMPANY fir. Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief May 11,- 1982 Page 2 We appreciate your attention to this issue. Should you require additional information, please contact us. | |||
Very truly yours, y ,e 4 | Very truly yours, y | ||
,e 4 | |||
..}} | |||
Latest revision as of 08:54, 18 December 2024
| ML20051H619 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 05/11/1982 |
| From: | Morisi A BOSTON EDISON CO. |
| To: | Vassallo D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 82-119, NUDOCS 8205170205 | |
| Download: ML20051H619 (2) | |
Text
l o
to e
[ 5:
o x
o BOSTON EDIBON COMPANY o.....................
n 3 e g
q
..y
,O C
d, j
4.v. wonia, MANAurR May 11,1982
'tr
{
p#
uuctran arraArios uppo=r ora ^aracar 6
BECo. Ltr. #82-119 Mr. Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293
Reference:
(A) Order of Modification of License
~(Mark I Program, dated January 19, 1982 (B) Telephone conversation between Mr. K. Eccleston (NRC) and Mr.
J. D. Keyes (Boston Edison) on April 27,1982
Subject:
Mark 1 Containment Program: Plant Unique Xn~ alysi s
Dear Sir:
This submittal is to document an extension request made in Reference (B).
In the cover letter of Reference (A), it is stated that Boston Edison shall submit the Plant Unique Analysis "in accordance with the schedule provided in (the) 198171 ark 1%ners' Group Status Summary Report or as subsequently agreed upon by you and the staff".
We intended that our submittal would be made in April,1982. However, Teledyne, the A/E we engaged for the Mark I Program, has informed us that the preparation and review of this Analysis will require more time than originally anticipated.
The current projection by Teledyne in" :tes that we will be able to submit the analysis, with the exception of torus attached piping and items related thereto, by September, 1982. A specific submittal date for the analysis concerning the torus attached piping and related items is being developed, and will be the subject of a supplement to this request.
Boston Edison Co. believes that the Mark I tasks which we have alseady completed have substantially improved the margins of safety of the containment systems. We believe for this reason that good cause exists for the extension of the Plant Unique Analysis submittal deadline.
lcaC c
8205170SOf to
'l BOSTON E~o 5 0 N COMPANY fir. Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief May 11,- 1982 Page 2 We appreciate your attention to this issue. Should you require additional information, please contact us.
Very truly yours, y
,e 4
..