ML20070H706: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-401 | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier / | ||
Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection T1/G1 | |||
T2/G1 | (#R18) | ||
AK2.03 Wrong K/A statement selected (AK vice EK). Changed from AK2.03 to EK2.03 with Chief Examiner concurrence (10/28/2019). | |||
T2/G1 | |||
(#R31) | |||
A3.04 Wrong K/A statement listed for A3.04. Sample Plan says System Lineup which is the statement for A3.03. | |||
Chief Examiner concurs and K/A changed to A3.03 to match K/A statement. | Chief Examiner concurs and K/A changed to A3.03 to match K/A statement. | ||
T2/G1 | T2/G1 | ||
(#R38) | |||
K3.06 Difficult to write a question to this K/A since Fermi 2 Numac APRMs do not have any relationships with the IRMs such that loss or malfunction of an APRM will impact an IRM. | |||
Chief Examiner systematically re-selected K3.07. | Chief Examiner systematically re-selected K3.07. | ||
2.1.32 | T3 | ||
(#R68) 2.1.32 K/A system tie is that is necessary for this K/A is not acceptable for T3. | |||
Chief Examiner systematically reselected (Option 1 K/A 2.4.41 / Option 2 K/A 2.1.1) | |||
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4}} | ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:36, 16 December 2024
| ML20070H706 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 02/27/2020 |
| From: | Chuck Zoia NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | DTE Energy, Detroit Edison, Co |
| Zoia C | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19303A625 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20070H706 (2) | |
Text
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier /
Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection T1/G1
(#R18)
AK2.03 Wrong K/A statement selected (AK vice EK). Changed from AK2.03 to EK2.03 with Chief Examiner concurrence (10/28/2019).
T2/G1
(#R31)
A3.04 Wrong K/A statement listed for A3.04. Sample Plan says System Lineup which is the statement for A3.03.
Chief Examiner concurs and K/A changed to A3.03 to match K/A statement.
T2/G1
(#R38)
K3.06 Difficult to write a question to this K/A since Fermi 2 Numac APRMs do not have any relationships with the IRMs such that loss or malfunction of an APRM will impact an IRM.
Chief Examiner systematically re-selected K3.07.
T3
(#R68) 2.1.32 K/A system tie is that is necessary for this K/A is not acceptable for T3.
Chief Examiner systematically reselected (Option 1 K/A 2.4.41 / Option 2 K/A 2.1.1)