ML20080P897: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:--- ,
{{#Wiki_filter:---,
fA/7 2/
fA/7 2/
Kin Tech Division Pa CIFIC SCIENTIFIC September 14, 1983                                                                         g3 4       YL
Kin Tech Division Pa CIFIC SCIENTIFIC September 14, 1983 g3 4
                                                                                                      >    "      eG 3
YL eG 3
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection & Enforcement                                                               ;
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection & Enforcement 1990 N.
1990 N. California Blvd.
California Blvd.
Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Gentlemen:
Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Gentlemen:
During testing of Pacific Scientific Company's PSA-1 shock arrestors, part number 1801102-05, at Union Electric Calloway Station by Daniel International personnel, 5 of 7 snubbers tested failed.         Disassembly by Union Electric personnel revealed one broken capstan spring tang on each of the 5 failed snubbers.
During testing of Pacific Scientific Company's PSA-1 shock arrestors, part number 1801102-05, at Union Electric Calloway Station by Daniel International personnel, 5 of 7 snubbers tested failed.
Pacific Scientific Company requested failed springs for indepen-dent metallurgical examination. Failed components were returned to Pacific Scientific Company who forwarded broken springs to "Mettek", 1805 E. Carnegie, Santa Ana, CA 92705, (714) 549-1083, for metallurgical and fracture analysis.
Disassembly by Union Electric personnel revealed one broken capstan spring tang on each of the 5 failed snubbers.
One spring exhibiting a visual crack in one tang (removed from snubber S/N 21524) was installed by Pacific Scientific Co. into a snubber and subjected to a full load (1500 lbs.) acceleration test per Acceptance Test Procedure, IT-519.                                   This test was re-l peated 5 times (16 full load cycles) with no failures.                                   The cracked spring was then subjected to a dynamic load cycling
Pacific Scientific Company requested failed springs for indepen-dent metallurgical examination.
!              test per DR 1377.               This test cycles the snubber at 3 Hertz in-tervals from 3 to 33 Hertz for 10 seconds at each interval at 100%, 75% and 50% rated loads, a total of 5940 cycles.                                   The cracked sp, ring satisfactorily passed this test.
Failed components were returned to Pacific Scientific Company who forwarded broken springs to "Mettek", 1805 E. Carnegie, Santa Ana, CA 92705, (714) 549-1083, for metallurgical and fracture analysis.
One spring exhibiting a visual crack in one tang (removed from snubber S/N 21524) was installed by Pacific Scientific Co. into a snubber and subjected to a full load (1500 lbs.) acceleration test per Acceptance Test Procedure, IT-519.
This test was re-peated 5 times (16 full load cycles) with no failures.
The l
cracked spring was then subjected to a dynamic load cycling test per DR 1377.
This test cycles the snubber at 3 Hertz in-tervals from 3 to 33 Hertz for 10 seconds at each interval at 100%, 75% and 50% rated loads, a total of 5940 cycles.
The cracked sp, ring satisfactorily passed this test.
Further testing was accomplished by Pacific Scientific Company using the production acceptance test machine in an effort to i
Further testing was accomplished by Pacific Scientific Company using the production acceptance test machine in an effort to i
l reproduce test results obtained at the Calloway site. Test results were substantively duplicated and indicated that the gg      capstan spring tang had been broken off prior to testing by egg        Daniel International.
l reproduce test results obtained at the Calloway site.
So 1  gg        Pacific Scientific Co. 100% functionally tests snubbers prior l  en        to shipment and review of test results indicates snubbers were O        satisfactory at time of shipment.
Test results were substantively duplicated and indicated that the capstan spring tang had been broken off prior to testing by gg Daniel International.
m                                                                                                                     '
egg Sogg Pacific Scientific Co. 100% functionally tests snubbers prior 1
l l
to shipment and review of test results indicates snubbers were l
ob oo        In an effort to determine if spring failure could be generic, Pacific Scientific Co. researched snubber shipments of springs l  N@
enO satisfactory at time of shipment.
o          from the identical lot as those that failed.                                 Union Electric Co.
m l
l   f         personnel effected the return of 11 additional snubbers from 1346 S. State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92803,(714) 774 5217, TELEX 65-5421
ob In an effort to determine if spring failure could be generic, l
          -                                                                - -. -      .~ -         -  _l             .
oo l
N@
Pacific Scientific Co. researched snubber shipments of springs o
from the identical lot as those that failed.
Union Electric Co.
l f personnel effected the return of 11 additional snubbers from 1346 S. State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92803,(714) 774 5217, TELEX 65-5421
.~ -
_l


b
b
                                                        - Page 2 -
- Page 2 -
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. Wolf Creek Station. These were returned to Pacific Scientific on Sept. 9, 1983, for testing and evaluation.
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. Wolf Creek Station.
Eleven (11) each 1801102-05 PSA-1 shock arrestors returned to Pacific Scientific Co. by Kansas Gas & Electric Co. Wolf Creek Station were visually and functionally tested by Pacific Scien-tific Co. personnel.in the presence of Mr. Dave Walsh, KG&E, and Mr. Kit Kitson who represented Union Electric Co. Pacific Scien-tific personnel present were Mr. W. S. Wright and P. A. Hadnagy.
These were returned to Pacific Scientific on Sept. 9, 1983, for testing and evaluation.
All eleven PSA-1 shock arrestors (S/Ns 21511 thru 21521) were disassembled to a level permitting verification that the capstan spring was properly installed and whole. The shock arrestors were reassembled and subjected to a successful acceleration test at full rated load (1500 lbs.) per Pacific Scientific Acceptance Test Procedure, IT-519 (Exhibit I).
Eleven (11) each 1801102-05 PSA-1 shock arrestors returned to Pacific Scientific Co. by Kansas Gas & Electric Co. Wolf Creek Station were visually and functionally tested by Pacific Scien-tific Co. personnel.in the presence of Mr. Dave Walsh, KG&E, and Mr. Kit Kitson who represented Union Electric Co.
Pacific Scien-tific personnel present were Mr. W.
S. Wright and P. A. Hadnagy.
All eleven PSA-1 shock arrestors (S/Ns 21511 thru 21521) were disassembled to a level permitting verification that the capstan spring was properly installed and whole.
The shock arrestors were reassembled and subjected to a successful acceleration test at full rated load (1500 lbs.) per Pacific Scientific Acceptance Test Procedure, IT-519 (Exhibit I).
Following successful functional test, all eleven shock arrestors were disassembled to facilitate visual and non-destructive exami-nation of the capstan springs:
Following successful functional test, all eleven shock arrestors were disassembled to facilitate visual and non-destructive exami-nation of the capstan springs:
S/N 21511 - No apparent visual defects. Magnetic particle non-destructive examination revealed indications in both spring tangs with one tang exhibiting three separate indications. Indications were suspected to be micro cracks.
S/N 21511 - No apparent visual defects.
S/N 21512 - No apparent visual defects. Magnetic particle exami-nation exhibited an indication of one micro crack on on one tang.
Magnetic particle non-destructive examination revealed indications in both spring tangs with one tang exhibiting three separate indications.
S/N 21513 - No apparent visual defects. No magnetic particle examination indications.
Indications were suspected to be micro cracks.
S/N 21514 - No apparent visual defects. No magnetic particle examination indications.
S/N 21512 - No apparent visual defects.
S/N 21515 - No apparent visual defects. Both tangs exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.
Magnetic particle exami-nation exhibited an indication of one micro crack on on one tang.
S/N 21516 - No apparent visual defects. No magnetic particle examination indications.
S/N 21513 - No apparent visual defects.
S/N 21517 - No apparent visual defects. No magnetic particle examination indications.
No magnetic particle examination indications.
S/N 21518 - No apparent visual defects. Both tangs exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.
S/N 21514 - No apparent visual defects.
S/N 21519 - No apparent visual defects. Both tangs exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.
No magnetic particle examination indications.
S/N 21515 - No apparent visual defects.
Both tangs exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.
S/N 21516 - No apparent visual defects.
No magnetic particle examination indications.
S/N 21517 - No apparent visual defects.
No magnetic particle examination indications.
S/N 21518 - No apparent visual defects.
Both tangs exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.
S/N 21519 - No apparent visual defects.
Both tangs exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.


                                                              - Pega 3 -
- Pega 3 -
S/N 21520 - No apparent visual defects.       One tang exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.
S/N 21520 - No apparent visual defects.
S/N -21521 - No apparent visual defects.       One tang exhibited a magnetic. particle micro crack indication.
One tang exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.
S/N -21521 - No apparent visual defects.
One tang exhibited a magnetic. particle micro crack indication.
Five (5) capstan springs exhibiting non-destructive magnetic particle examination indications were assembled into a test snubber and subjected to a dynamic load of 1500 lbs. at :Tre-quencies of 3 to 33 Hertz intervals for 10 seconds each at 100%,
Five (5) capstan springs exhibiting non-destructive magnetic particle examination indications were assembled into a test snubber and subjected to a dynamic load of 1500 lbs. at :Tre-quencies of 3 to 33 Hertz intervals for 10 seconds each at 100%,
75% and 50% of rated load.
75% and 50% of rated load.
The springs tested represented the " worst case" as determined by the non-destructive magnetic particle inspection. They were S/Ns 21511, 21515, 21518, 21519 and 21520.
The springs tested represented the " worst case" as determined by the non-destructive magnetic particle inspection.
Springs, S/Ns 21515 and 21518, survived the entire test (5940 cycles). Spring, S/N 21511, survived 533 full load cycles before both tangs failed. S/H 21519 survived 1800 full load cycles be-fore one tar.g failed, and S/N 21520 survived 1850 full load cycles before one tang failed.                                   _
They were S/Ns 21511, 21515, 21518, 21519 and 21520.
Springs, S/Ns 21515 and 21518, survived the entire test (5940 cycles).
Spring, S/N 21511, survived 533 full load cycles before both tangs failed.
S/H 21519 survived 1800 full load cycles be-fore one tar.g failed, and S/N 21520 survived 1850 full load cycles before one tang failed.
The capstan springs are manufactured for Pacific Scientific Co.
The capstan springs are manufactured for Pacific Scientific Co.
by John Evans' Sons, Inc., Lansdale, PA.         These springs are supplied formed, stress relieved and 100% magnetic particle inspected to Pacific Scientific Co., who then subcontracts the springs for silver plating.     Pacific Scientific Co. part numbers for the capstan springs are as follows:
by John Evans' Sons, Inc., Lansdale, PA.
PSA-1     (1801613)
These springs are supplied formed, stress relieved and 100% magnetic particle inspected to Pacific Scientific Co., who then subcontracts the springs for silver plating.
PSA-3     (1801614)
Pacific Scientific Co. part numbers for the capstan springs are as follows:
Initial oral report by "Mettek" metallurgist, Mr. Larry McKnight, indicates springs had micro cracks at root of tang radius.         In-vestigation revealed plating salt discoloration and/or presence of silver on fracture face. This indicates springs cracked prior to or during the silver plating process. Metallurgist opinion is that spring vendor's forming process provides the conditions which will allow parts to crack during exposure to silver plating process.
PSA-1 (1801613)
PSA-3 (1801614)
Initial oral report by "Mettek" metallurgist, Mr. Larry McKnight, indicates springs had micro cracks at root of tang radius.
In-vestigation revealed plating salt discoloration and/or presence of silver on fracture face.
This indicates springs cracked prior to or during the silver plating process.
Metallurgist opinion is that spring vendor's forming process provides the conditions which will allow parts to crack during exposure to silver plating process.
Pacific Scientific is C;f6 ting corrective action with J. Evans Co.,
Pacific Scientific is C;f6 ting corrective action with J. Evans Co.,
the nature of which ik ,ot fet fully established.
the nature of which ik,ot fet fully established.
Recommendations Inspect all PSA-1 and PSA-3 shock arrestors which contain g              capstan springs manufactured by John Evans Co.
Recommendations Inspect all PSA-1 and PSA-3 shock arrestors which contain capstan springs manufactured by John Evans Co.
Inspection should include removal of spring to facilitate examination for tang cracks,by use of magnetic particle or liquid penetrant non-destructive examination.
g Inspection should include removal of spring to facilitate examination for tang cracks,by use of magnetic particle or liquid penetrant non-destructive examination.
[
[


e .   ,
e.
                                                                                      - Paga 4 -
- Paga 4 -
Recommendations (Cont ' d. )
Recommendations (Cont ' d. )
Urgency of inspection will need to be assessed by individual owners based on snubber system application and analysis of results of tests conducted on failed snubbers and reported herein.
Urgency of inspection will need to be assessed by individual owners based on snubber system application and analysis of results of tests conducted on failed snubbers and reported herein.
Line 79: Line 116:
Affected Serial Numbers PSA-1 Pacific Scientific Part No. 1801102-05 S/Ns 15672 thru 16921, 18211 thru 21160, 21411 thru 22060, 22311 thru 22710 PSA-3 Pacific Scientific Part No. 1801106-05 S/Ns 21311 thru 21610, 24311 thru 25310, 25361 thru 25960, 27194 thru 28543 s
Affected Serial Numbers PSA-1 Pacific Scientific Part No. 1801102-05 S/Ns 15672 thru 16921, 18211 thru 21160, 21411 thru 22060, 22311 thru 22710 PSA-3 Pacific Scientific Part No. 1801106-05 S/Ns 21311 thru 21610, 24311 thru 25310, 25361 thru 25960, 27194 thru 28543 s
Very truly yours, PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC Kin-T ch Division P. A. Hadnagy Director Technical Operations PAH:jrc
Very truly yours, PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC Kin-T ch Division P. A. Hadnagy Director Technical Operations PAH:jrc
    .  .}}
.}}

Latest revision as of 08:48, 14 December 2024

Part 21 Rept Re Snubber Failure During Shock Arrestor Test. Caused by Broken Capstan Spring.Vendor Effecting Corrective Action W/J Evans Co to Inspect Shock Arrestors Containing Evans Springs
ML20080P897
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 09/14/1983
From: Hadnagy P
PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
REF-PT21-83-016-000 PT21-83-016-000, PT21-83-16, NUDOCS 8310120092
Download: ML20080P897 (4)


Text

---,

fA/7 2/

Kin Tech Division Pa CIFIC SCIENTIFIC September 14, 1983 g3 4

YL eG 3

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection & Enforcement 1990 N.

California Blvd.

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Gentlemen:

During testing of Pacific Scientific Company's PSA-1 shock arrestors, part number 1801102-05, at Union Electric Calloway Station by Daniel International personnel, 5 of 7 snubbers tested failed.

Disassembly by Union Electric personnel revealed one broken capstan spring tang on each of the 5 failed snubbers.

Pacific Scientific Company requested failed springs for indepen-dent metallurgical examination.

Failed components were returned to Pacific Scientific Company who forwarded broken springs to "Mettek", 1805 E. Carnegie, Santa Ana, CA 92705, (714) 549-1083, for metallurgical and fracture analysis.

One spring exhibiting a visual crack in one tang (removed from snubber S/N 21524) was installed by Pacific Scientific Co. into a snubber and subjected to a full load (1500 lbs.) acceleration test per Acceptance Test Procedure, IT-519.

This test was re-peated 5 times (16 full load cycles) with no failures.

The l

cracked spring was then subjected to a dynamic load cycling test per DR 1377.

This test cycles the snubber at 3 Hertz in-tervals from 3 to 33 Hertz for 10 seconds at each interval at 100%, 75% and 50% rated loads, a total of 5940 cycles.

The cracked sp, ring satisfactorily passed this test.

Further testing was accomplished by Pacific Scientific Company using the production acceptance test machine in an effort to i

l reproduce test results obtained at the Calloway site.

Test results were substantively duplicated and indicated that the capstan spring tang had been broken off prior to testing by gg Daniel International.

egg Sogg Pacific Scientific Co. 100% functionally tests snubbers prior 1

to shipment and review of test results indicates snubbers were l

enO satisfactory at time of shipment.

m l

ob In an effort to determine if spring failure could be generic, l

oo l

N@

Pacific Scientific Co. researched snubber shipments of springs o

from the identical lot as those that failed.

Union Electric Co.

l f personnel effected the return of 11 additional snubbers from 1346 S. State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92803,(714) 774 5217, TELEX 65-5421

.~ -

_l

b

- Page 2 -

Kansas Gas & Electric Co. Wolf Creek Station.

These were returned to Pacific Scientific on Sept. 9, 1983, for testing and evaluation.

Eleven (11) each 1801102-05 PSA-1 shock arrestors returned to Pacific Scientific Co. by Kansas Gas & Electric Co. Wolf Creek Station were visually and functionally tested by Pacific Scien-tific Co. personnel.in the presence of Mr. Dave Walsh, KG&E, and Mr. Kit Kitson who represented Union Electric Co.

Pacific Scien-tific personnel present were Mr. W.

S. Wright and P. A. Hadnagy.

All eleven PSA-1 shock arrestors (S/Ns 21511 thru 21521) were disassembled to a level permitting verification that the capstan spring was properly installed and whole.

The shock arrestors were reassembled and subjected to a successful acceleration test at full rated load (1500 lbs.) per Pacific Scientific Acceptance Test Procedure, IT-519 (Exhibit I).

Following successful functional test, all eleven shock arrestors were disassembled to facilitate visual and non-destructive exami-nation of the capstan springs:

S/N 21511 - No apparent visual defects.

Magnetic particle non-destructive examination revealed indications in both spring tangs with one tang exhibiting three separate indications.

Indications were suspected to be micro cracks.

S/N 21512 - No apparent visual defects.

Magnetic particle exami-nation exhibited an indication of one micro crack on on one tang.

S/N 21513 - No apparent visual defects.

No magnetic particle examination indications.

S/N 21514 - No apparent visual defects.

No magnetic particle examination indications.

S/N 21515 - No apparent visual defects.

Both tangs exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.

S/N 21516 - No apparent visual defects.

No magnetic particle examination indications.

S/N 21517 - No apparent visual defects.

No magnetic particle examination indications.

S/N 21518 - No apparent visual defects.

Both tangs exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.

S/N 21519 - No apparent visual defects.

Both tangs exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.

- Pega 3 -

S/N 21520 - No apparent visual defects.

One tang exhibited a magnetic particle micro crack indication.

S/N -21521 - No apparent visual defects.

One tang exhibited a magnetic. particle micro crack indication.

Five (5) capstan springs exhibiting non-destructive magnetic particle examination indications were assembled into a test snubber and subjected to a dynamic load of 1500 lbs. at :Tre-quencies of 3 to 33 Hertz intervals for 10 seconds each at 100%,

75% and 50% of rated load.

The springs tested represented the " worst case" as determined by the non-destructive magnetic particle inspection.

They were S/Ns 21511, 21515, 21518, 21519 and 21520.

Springs, S/Ns 21515 and 21518, survived the entire test (5940 cycles).

Spring, S/N 21511, survived 533 full load cycles before both tangs failed.

S/H 21519 survived 1800 full load cycles be-fore one tar.g failed, and S/N 21520 survived 1850 full load cycles before one tang failed.

The capstan springs are manufactured for Pacific Scientific Co.

by John Evans' Sons, Inc., Lansdale, PA.

These springs are supplied formed, stress relieved and 100% magnetic particle inspected to Pacific Scientific Co., who then subcontracts the springs for silver plating.

Pacific Scientific Co. part numbers for the capstan springs are as follows:

PSA-1 (1801613)

PSA-3 (1801614)

Initial oral report by "Mettek" metallurgist, Mr. Larry McKnight, indicates springs had micro cracks at root of tang radius.

In-vestigation revealed plating salt discoloration and/or presence of silver on fracture face.

This indicates springs cracked prior to or during the silver plating process.

Metallurgist opinion is that spring vendor's forming process provides the conditions which will allow parts to crack during exposure to silver plating process.

Pacific Scientific is C;f6 ting corrective action with J. Evans Co.,

the nature of which ik,ot fet fully established.

Recommendations Inspect all PSA-1 and PSA-3 shock arrestors which contain capstan springs manufactured by John Evans Co.

g Inspection should include removal of spring to facilitate examination for tang cracks,by use of magnetic particle or liquid penetrant non-destructive examination.

[

e.

- Paga 4 -

Recommendations (Cont ' d. )

Urgency of inspection will need to be assessed by individual owners based on snubber system application and analysis of results of tests conducted on failed snubbers and reported herein.

Pacific Scientific is preparing.a service bulletin to describe method of spring removal and reinstallation.

Affected Serial Numbers PSA-1 Pacific Scientific Part No. 1801102-05 S/Ns 15672 thru 16921, 18211 thru 21160, 21411 thru 22060, 22311 thru 22710 PSA-3 Pacific Scientific Part No. 1801106-05 S/Ns 21311 thru 21610, 24311 thru 25310, 25361 thru 25960, 27194 thru 28543 s

Very truly yours, PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC Kin-T ch Division P. A. Hadnagy Director Technical Operations PAH:jrc

.