ML20126F919: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:O60
{{#Wiki_filter:O60
        .
.
.
  .
.
'   '
.
                                            DEC 0 41932
'
      Docket No. 50-155
'
      Consumers Power Company
DEC 0 41932
      ATIN: William L. Beckman
Docket No. 50-155
              Plant Manager
Consumers Power Company
      Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant
ATIN:
      10269 US 31 North
William L. Beckman
      Charlevoix, MI 49720
Plant Manager
      Dear Mr. Beckman:
Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant
      SUBJECT: RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION AT BIG ROCK POINT
10269 US 31 North
      This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. N. Shah of this
Charlevoix, MI 49720
      office on November 30 to December 4,1992.       The inspection included a review
Dear Mr. Beckman:
      of authorized activities for your Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant facility. At
SUBJECT: RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION AT BIG ROCK POINT
      the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with those
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. N. Shah of this
      members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
office on November 30 to December 4,1992.
      Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. These
The inspection included a review
      areas included radiation protection performance during routine and outage
of authorized activities for your Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant facility.
      conditions. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
At
      examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with those
      interviews with personnel.
members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
      Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. These
      to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of
areas included radiation protection performance during routine and outage
      Violation (Notice). Although 10 CFR 2.201 requires you to submit to this
conditions.
      office, within 20 days of your receipt of this Notice, a written statement of
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
      explanation, we note that this violation had been corrected and those actions
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
      were reviewed during this inspection. Therefore, no response with respect.to
interviews with personnel.
      this matter is required.
Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared
      In addition, two violations were identified, but are not being cited because
to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of
      the criteria specified in Section VII.B. of the " General Statement of Policy
Violation (Notice). Although 10 CFR 2.201 requires you to submit to this
      and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions," (Enforcement Policy,10 CFR Part
office, within 20 days of your receipt of this Notice, a written statement of
      2, Appendix C) were satisfied.
explanation, we note that this violation had been corrected and those actions
      In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
were reviewed during this inspection. Therefore, no response with respect.to
      this letter and the enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
this matter is required.
                3100dG                                                         zf&
In addition, two violations were identified, but are not being cited because
              9212a o19e 921224
the criteria specified in Section VII.B. of the " General Statement of Policy
                PDR   ADOCK 05000155
and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions," (Enforcement Policy,10 CFR Part
                0                 PDR
2, Appendix C) were satisfied.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter and the enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
3100dG
zf&
9212a o19e 921224
PDR
ADOCK 05000155
0
PDR


                    _ _ _ _         _.     .
_ _ _ _
                                                                                  . .
_.
.     .
.
  .
.
    Consumers Power Company                       2
.
    We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
.
                                            Sincerely,
.
                                      "Orginst egned by J. W. McCormick-Barger"
.
                                            Cynthia D. Pederson, Chief
Consumers Power Company
                                            Reactor Support Programs Branch
2
    Enclosures:                                                                       g
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
    1.   Notice of Violation                                                           d
Sincerely,
    2.   Inspection Report                                                           {
"Orginst egned by J. W. McCormick-Barger"
            No. 50-155/92026(DRSS)
Cynthia D. Pederson, Chief
    cc w/ enclosures:
Reactor Support Programs Branch
    David P. Hoffman, Vice President
Enclosures:
        Nuclear Operations
g
    DCD/DCB (RIDS)
1.
    OC/LFDCB -
Notice of Violation
    Resident inspector, Rill
d
    James R. Padgett, Michigan Public
2.
        Service Commission
Inspection Report
    Michigan Department of
{
        Public Health
No. 50-155/92026(DRSS)
    Big Rock Point, LPM, NRR
cc w/ enclosures:
    SRI, Palisades
David P. Hoffman, Vice President
                                                                        Vl0
Nuclear Operations
    "Sb
DCD/DCB (RIDS)
                  R1
OC/LFDCB -
                            ,
Resident inspector, Rill
                                p      g                 i
James R. Padgett, Michigan Public
                                                                    RU ()7
Service Commission
    Shah /sd     Schumacher                 ips     Peded9n       D aye e
Michigan Department of
    12/ts/92                 p. t$ 4   /s/zs/rz       / 2/ujp
Public Health
                                                            r
Big Rock Point, LPM, NRR
                                                                      gt      7_.
SRI, Palisades
                                                                        F
Vl0
"Sb
p
g
RU ()7
R1
i
Shah /sd
Schumacher
ips
Peded9n
D aye e
,
12/ts/92
p. t$ 4
/s/zs/rz
/ 2/ujp
gt
7_.
r
F
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 18:51, 12 December 2024

Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-155/92-26 on Stated Date & Notice of Violation.Two Violations Also Noted But Not Cited
ML20126F919
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/24/1992
From: Pederson C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Beckman W
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
Shared Package
ML20126F921 List:
References
NUDOCS 9212310198
Download: ML20126F919 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000155/1992026

Text

O60

.

.

.

'

'

DEC 0 41932

Docket No. 50-155

Consumers Power Company

ATIN:

William L. Beckman

Plant Manager

Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant

10269 US 31 North

Charlevoix, MI 49720

Dear Mr. Beckman:

SUBJECT: RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION AT BIG ROCK POINT

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. N. Shah of this

office on November 30 to December 4,1992.

The inspection included a review

of authorized activities for your Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant facility.

At

the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with those

members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. These

areas included radiation protection performance during routine and outage

conditions.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared

to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of

Violation (Notice). Although 10 CFR 2.201 requires you to submit to this

office, within 20 days of your receipt of this Notice, a written statement of

explanation, we note that this violation had been corrected and those actions

were reviewed during this inspection. Therefore, no response with respect.to

this matter is required.

In addition, two violations were identified, but are not being cited because

the criteria specified in Section VII.B. of the " General Statement of Policy

and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions," (Enforcement Policy,10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C) were satisfied.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter and the enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

3100dG

zf&

9212a o19e 921224

PDR

ADOCK 05000155

0

PDR

_ _ _ _

_.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Consumers Power Company

2

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

"Orginst egned by J. W. McCormick-Barger"

Cynthia D. Pederson, Chief

Reactor Support Programs Branch

Enclosures:

g

1.

Notice of Violation

d

2.

Inspection Report

{

No. 50-155/92026(DRSS)

cc w/ enclosures:

David P. Hoffman, Vice President

Nuclear Operations

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

OC/LFDCB -

Resident inspector, Rill

James R. Padgett, Michigan Public

Service Commission

Michigan Department of

Public Health

Big Rock Point, LPM, NRR

SRI, Palisades

Vl0

"Sb

p

g

RU ()7

R1

i

Shah /sd

Schumacher

ips

Peded9n

D aye e

,

12/ts/92

p. t$ 4

/s/zs/rz

/ 2/ujp

gt

7_.

r

F

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20126F919&oldid=4274717"