ML20129B478: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
{{#Wiki_filter:-
  .
.
                                                                                        l
APPENDIX A
                                                                                        l
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
                                            APPENDIX A
Houston Lighting & Power Company
                                        NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Docket No.:
        Houston Lighting & Power Company                   Docket No.: 50-498/499
50-498/499
        South Texas Project Units 1 and 2                 Permit:     CPPR 128/129
South Texas Project Units 1 and 2
        During an NRC inspection conducted during the period of January 1 through
Permit:
        February 28, 1985, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The
CPPR 128/129
        violation involved the failure to properly follow procedures. In accordance
During an NRC inspection conducted during the period of January 1 through
        with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement
February 28, 1985, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The
        Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below:
violation involved the failure to properly follow procedures.
        A.   Failure to Properly Follow Procedure
In accordance
              Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 requires that activities
with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement
              affecting quality be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with
Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below:
              appropriate instructions, procedures, or drawings. This requirement is
A.
              part of the approved QAPD (Quality Assurance Plan Description) for South
Failure to Properly Follow Procedure
              Texas Project.
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 requires that activities
affecting quality be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with
appropriate instructions, procedures, or drawings. This requirement is
part of the approved QAPD (Quality Assurance Plan Description) for South
Texas Project.
'
'
              Specifically, 0QAP, Section 4.0, paragraph 6.2.1.2, requires
Specifically, 0QAP, Section 4.0, paragraph 6.2.1.2, requires
              participation in a QA program indoctrination and paragraph 7.0 requires
participation in a QA program indoctrination and paragraph 7.0 requires
              records be maintained. Additionally,SAI(StartupAdministrative
records be maintained. Additionally,SAI(StartupAdministrative
              Instruction) 10. " Indoctrination, Training and Certification of Test
Instruction) 10. " Indoctrination, Training and Certification of Test
              Personnel," requires training and certification documentation be
Personnel," requires training and certification documentation be
              maintained by RMS (Records Management System) with copies in the Startup
maintained by RMS (Records Management System) with copies in the Startup
              Training Office.                 ,
Training Office.
              Contrary to the above, the NRC inspector reviewed five sets of training
,
              and certification files for senior or long-term startup personnel. One
Contrary to the above, the NRC inspector reviewed five sets of training
              file was missing a supervisor's signature and in the same file a
and certification files for senior or long-term startup personnel. One
              signature was placed in the wrong location. One file had no
file was missing a supervisor's signature and in the same file a
              documentation of the required QA lecture although the index stated he
signature was placed in the wrong location. One file had no
              attended.   The Startup Manager had not attended the required QA lecture
documentation of the required QA lecture although the index stated he
              which is a requirement prior to conducting safety-related activities.
attended.
              ThisisaSeverityLevelVviolation(SupplementIE)(498/499-8501-01).
The Startup Manager had not attended the required QA lecture
        Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Houston Lighting & Power Com]any is
which is a requirement prior to conducting safety-related activities.
        hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of t1e
ThisisaSeverityLevelVviolation(SupplementIE)(498/499-8501-01).
        letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply,
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Houston Lighting & Power Com]any is
        including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violations if admitted,
hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of t1e
      8507290169 850723
letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply,
      PDR     ADOCK 05000498
including for each violation:
      G                   PDR.
(1) the reason for the violations if admitted,
8507290169 850723
PDR
ADOCK 05000498
G
PDR.


      .__                               .
.__
                                              _ _ _ .         . - .             .     .
.
                                                                                        _
_ _ _ .
    -
. - .
.
.
_
-
,,
,,
i
i
                                                      -2-
-2-
t
t
l            the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved,
l
l
the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved,
l
the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and
'
'
            the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and
the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown,
            the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending the response time.
      consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Arlington, Texas,
      Dated at Arlington, Texas,
this 23d day of July,1985
;
;
      this 23d day of July,1985
[
[
                                                          -
-
  ''       '
''
              .. _.__-___ _ _ __.-_ .___
'
.. _.__-___ _ _ __.-_ .___
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:04, 12 December 2024

Notice of Violation from Insp on 850101-0228
ML20129B478
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  
Issue date: 07/23/1985
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20129B383 List:
References
50-498-85-01, 50-498-85-1, 50-499-85-01, 50-499-85-1, NUDOCS 8507290169
Download: ML20129B478 (2)


See also: IR 05000101/2002028

Text

-

.

APPENDIX A

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Houston Lighting & Power Company

Docket No.:

50-498/499

South Texas Project Units 1 and 2

Permit:

CPPR 128/129

During an NRC inspection conducted during the period of January 1 through

February 28, 1985, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The

violation involved the failure to properly follow procedures.

In accordance

with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement

Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below:

A.

Failure to Properly Follow Procedure

Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 requires that activities

affecting quality be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with

appropriate instructions, procedures, or drawings. This requirement is

part of the approved QAPD (Quality Assurance Plan Description) for South

Texas Project.

'

Specifically, 0QAP, Section 4.0, paragraph 6.2.1.2, requires

participation in a QA program indoctrination and paragraph 7.0 requires

records be maintained. Additionally,SAI(StartupAdministrative

Instruction) 10. " Indoctrination, Training and Certification of Test

Personnel," requires training and certification documentation be

maintained by RMS (Records Management System) with copies in the Startup

Training Office.

,

Contrary to the above, the NRC inspector reviewed five sets of training

and certification files for senior or long-term startup personnel. One

file was missing a supervisor's signature and in the same file a

signature was placed in the wrong location. One file had no

documentation of the required QA lecture although the index stated he

attended.

The Startup Manager had not attended the required QA lecture

which is a requirement prior to conducting safety-related activities.

ThisisaSeverityLevelVviolation(SupplementIE)(498/499-8501-01).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Houston Lighting & Power Com]any is

hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of t1e

letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply,

including for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violations if admitted,

8507290169 850723

PDR

ADOCK 05000498

G

PDR.

.__

.

_ _ _ .

. - .

.

.

_

-

,,

i

-2-

t

l

the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved,

l

the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and

'

the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown,

consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Arlington, Texas,

this 23d day of July,1985

[

-

'

.. _.__-___ _ _ __.-_ .___