ENS 49744: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| event date = 01/18/2014 10:20 CST | | event date = 01/18/2014 10:20 CST | ||
| last update date = 01/20/2014 | | last update date = 01/20/2014 | ||
| title = Unit 2 Pyro Panel Non-Functional Due | | title = Unit 2 Pyro Panel Non-Functional Due to Unknown Equipment Problems | ||
| event text = At 10:20 [CST] on January 18, 2014, the Unit 2 Pyro Panel (fire/smoke detection panel) was declared non-functional due to an unknown equipment problem. Compensatory measures (e.g. continuous roving fire watches) have been established for all affected areas with the exception of the Unit 2 Containment Building. Containment fire watches have been established per the FSAR, which includes monitoring various temperatures, pressures, and other parameters for Containment, and systems associated with containment. However, this is not considered a satisfactory compensatory measure for maintaining effective assessment capability. Since a fire in Containment is an entry condition for the site's Emergency Plan, this is considered a loss of emergency assessment capability, and is being reported per 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(xiii). | | event text = At 10:20 [CST] on January 18, 2014, the Unit 2 Pyro Panel (fire/smoke detection panel) was declared non-functional due to an unknown equipment problem. Compensatory measures (e.g. continuous roving fire watches) have been established for all affected areas with the exception of the Unit 2 Containment Building. Containment fire watches have been established per the FSAR, which includes monitoring various temperatures, pressures, and other parameters for Containment, and systems associated with containment. However, this is not considered a satisfactory compensatory measure for maintaining effective assessment capability. Since a fire in Containment is an entry condition for the site's Emergency Plan, this is considered a loss of emergency assessment capability, and is being reported per 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(xiii). | ||
The NRC Senior Resident Inspector has been informed. | The NRC Senior Resident Inspector has been informed. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:52, 1 March 2018
| Where | |
|---|---|
Farley  Alabama (NRC Region 2) | |
| Reporting | |
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(xiii), Loss of Emergency Preparedness | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+-1.53 h-0.0638 days <br />-0.00911 weeks <br />-0.0021 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | Rick Lulling 14:48 Jan 18, 2014 |
| NRC Officer: | Charles Teal |
| Last Updated: | Jan 20, 2014 |
| 49744 - NRC Website
| |