ML20151D923: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:y                                           _m.
{{#Wiki_filter:y auum28-2f'8
6            . ,,uo cetermine its typ6E*u           auum28-2f'8 au
_m.
, [   pJ-j N
.,,uo cetermine its typ6E*u au
                      . diseases, such as Acquired Immu6ts n ser) l[ d)$p '          eficiency Syndrome.                    8843   smo  M         -
, [
                                                                                    .,    21J l
)$p '
fp                                                                                                     1 N-Plant Rule Changem                                                     o pM4 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission was to publish in the Federal Register today ith ,js
eficiency Syndrome.
                                                                                      .;. r proposed change in emergency planning regulations, starting the clock on the 60-day period set for public comment.
pJ-j 6
If adppted, the change would ease emer-gency planning requirements for nuclear plants, like Shoreham, when state and local                                             1 governments refuse to approve or partici-pate in emergency planning. Such plants would no longer have to demonstrate that emergency plans showed a "reasonable as-                                               ,
N
l surance" that the public health and safety could be protected. The safety standards for those plants would not be as tough as for plants with local- and state-supported g*      .
. diseases, such as Acquired Immu6ts n ser) l[
ergenii 51'1 ans7 -                                 A            f        /
d 8843 M 21J fp smo pM4 N-Plant Rule Changem o The Nuclear Regulatory Commission was; to publish in the Federal Register today ith,js
7 yThe NRC is considering the change to red                             Od/
.;. r proposed change in emergency planning regulations, starting the clock on the 60-day period set for public comment.
* move a possible veto power by state and lo-(cal governments over plant licensing.
If adppted, the change would ease emer-gency planning requirements for nuclear plants, like Shoreham, when state and local governments refuse to approve or partici-pate in emergency planning. Such plants would no longer have to demonstrate that emergency plans showed a "reasonable as-surance" that the public health and safety could be protected. The safety standards for those plants would not be as tough as for g*
NRC en diveder Vi;;tcr Stclle Wu                       e                         .
plants with local-and state-supported A
change was proposed because of the refusal                         n         e I   >
f
of New York and Suffolk County to partici-N pate in emergency planning for Shoreham.                                         [
/
The proposal has already proved contro-                       N r(*5 versial. Three governors and a group of con-gressmen spoke against the change at a Qgig meeting last month.                                             N f uMJ Those wishing to~c5mment-should virite' to<the Secretary of the Commission, Nucle- )
51 ergenii '1 ans7 -
[      ar Regulatory Commission, Washington,
yThe NRC is considering the change to red Od/
          \     D.C., 20555, attention docketing and ser-Qce branch.                             gg7aoga92070a13 g                           gyo 50 52FR6980   PDR n         >=         .            nwurir     n_._ _ -
7 move a possible veto power by state and lo-(cal governments over plant licensing.
                                .. -. - - - . - ...                      - -.--                    -}}
NRC en diveder Vi;;tcr Stclle Wu e
change was proposed because of the refusal n
e I >
of New York and Suffolk County to partici-
[
pate in emergency planning for Shoreham.
N The proposal has already proved contro-N r(*5 versial. Three governors and a group of con-Qgig gressmen spoke against the change at a meeting last month.
N f uMJ Those wishing to~c5mment-should virite'
[
to<the Secretary of the Commission, Nucle- )
ar Regulatory Commission, Washington,
\\
D.C., 20555, attention docketing and ser-Qce branch.
gg7aoga92070a13 gyo g
50 52FR6980 PDR n
>=
nwurir n_._ _
-}}

Latest revision as of 06:51, 11 December 2024

Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20151D923
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 03/11/1987
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC
References
FRN-52FR6980, RULE-PR-50 52FR6980-00021, 52FR6980-21, NUDOCS 8807250292
Download: ML20151D923 (1)


Text

y auum28-2f'8

_m.

.,,uo cetermine its typ6E*u au

, [

)$p '

eficiency Syndrome.

pJ-j 6

N

. diseases, such as Acquired Immu6ts n ser) l[

d 8843 M 21J fp smo pM4 N-Plant Rule Changem o The Nuclear Regulatory Commission was; to publish in the Federal Register today ith,js

.;. r proposed change in emergency planning regulations, starting the clock on the 60-day period set for public comment.

If adppted, the change would ease emer-gency planning requirements for nuclear plants, like Shoreham, when state and local governments refuse to approve or partici-pate in emergency planning. Such plants would no longer have to demonstrate that emergency plans showed a "reasonable as-surance" that the public health and safety could be protected. The safety standards for those plants would not be as tough as for g*

plants with local-and state-supported A

f

/

51 ergenii '1 ans7 -

yThe NRC is considering the change to red Od/

7 move a possible veto power by state and lo-(cal governments over plant licensing.

NRC en diveder Vi;;tcr Stclle Wu e

change was proposed because of the refusal n

e I >

of New York and Suffolk County to partici-

[

pate in emergency planning for Shoreham.

N The proposal has already proved contro-N r(*5 versial. Three governors and a group of con-Qgig gressmen spoke against the change at a meeting last month.

N f uMJ Those wishing to~c5mment-should virite'

[

to<the Secretary of the Commission, Nucle- )

ar Regulatory Commission, Washington,

\\

D.C., 20555, attention docketing and ser-Qce branch.

gg7aoga92070a13 gyo g

50 52FR6980 PDR n

>=

nwurir n_._ _

-