ML20199C087: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:' | ||
' | |||
' | |||
.. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
[ :j .%.fl | |||
l | |||
^ | |||
s$ | |||
_ | |||
4 ( A . . i | |||
. .hi .. .A N.E- | |||
.. | u r wu% .5 | ||
MM | |||
' | |||
g | |||
8 | |||
- | |||
.. | |||
"""U 2b N | |||
Mr. Stephen G. Frantz, Director | |||
Reed Reactor Facility | |||
.; | |||
- | |||
Reed College | |||
Ig | |||
3203 S.E. Woodstock Boulevard | |||
3 g | |||
Portland, Oregon 97202-8199 | |||
i | |||
.g | |||
. m | |||
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-288/97-202 AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION | |||
5d | |||
a | |||
Dear Mr. Frantz: | |||
i | |||
i | |||
This refers to tho inspection conducted on December 15-18, 1397, at your TRIGA Mark-l | |||
V | |||
research reactor facility. The inspectian included a review of activities authorized for your | |||
g | |||
f acility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. | |||
a | |||
Vuious ccoects of your safety program were inspected including selective examinations of | |||
j | |||
procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of | |||
, mi | |||
.__ | |||
activities in progress. | |||
As a result of tne inspection, four violations were identified. The NRC is concerned because | |||
$ | |||
the violations appear to have been the result of a lack of attention to detail. The violations | |||
' | |||
are cited in the e :losed Notice of Violation (Notice), and the circumstances surrounding the | |||
violations are described in detail in the enclosed report. | |||
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the | |||
! | |||
enclosed Notice when preparing vour response. In your response, you should document the | |||
specific actions taken and any additional acticrs you plan to take to prevent recurrence. | |||
- $ | |||
After reviewing your response to the Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and | |||
] | |||
the results of tuture inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement | |||
3 | |||
action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements. | |||
3 | |||
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and | |||
g- | |||
its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. | |||
Should you have any questions conceining this letter, please contact us. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY: Marvin Mendonca for | |||
Seymour H. Weiss, Director | |||
g | |||
Non-Pov qr Reactor and Decommissianing | |||
j | |||
Project Directorate | |||
Division of Reactor Programs Management | |||
* | |||
Oifice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
d | |||
Docket No. 50-288 | |||
--- | |||
License No. R-112 | |||
- | |||
h | |||
h | |||
Enclosures: 1. Notice of Violation | |||
f | |||
b' _ , | |||
f | |||
@ **"" | |||
2. NRC Inspection Repon | |||
M | |||
Y | |||
cc w/ enclosures: | |||
See next page | |||
DISTRIBUTION: | |||
, | |||
HARD COPY | |||
; | |||
Docket File 50-288 SWeiss | |||
E-M All | |||
I | |||
PUBLIC | |||
CBassett | |||
AAdarns | |||
WEresian | |||
$ | |||
PDND r/f | |||
EHylton | |||
TBurdick | |||
SHolmes | |||
DScrenci, (2) | |||
BJones | |||
PDoyle | |||
Pisaac | |||
1 | |||
WDean, OEDO | |||
Nuciear Safety | |||
MMendonce | |||
TMichaels | |||
g g | |||
= | |||
JRoe | |||
Information Center | |||
TDragoun | |||
, , | |||
) | |||
3 | |||
;j. | |||
b | |||
' | |||
- | |||
POND:RI | |||
fpMD:LA | |||
PbMD:D | |||
\\ | |||
CBpssett | |||
Effylton | |||
Sweiss | |||
-- | |||
' | |||
1/la/98 | |||
1/ 2/98 | |||
1 @ 98 | |||
? | |||
2 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
i | |||
DOCUMENT NAME: G\\SECY\\BASSETT\\VIOLATIO | |||
M | |||
9801290127 980123 | |||
l | |||
h | |||
Dr. | |||
ADOCK 0500 | |||
8 | |||
; | |||
, | |||
_ .... . . . _ _ . . . . , _ | |||
. . . . | |||
u | |||
. | |||
5 | |||
. _ _ - _. | |||
~ e 9' | ~ e 9' | ||
gganaroqk | |||
' | |||
UNITED STATES | |||
,y! | |||
'j | |||
NUCLEAP, REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
* | |||
s | |||
WASHINGTON, o.C. 2006H001 | |||
%..... | |||
January 23, 1998 | |||
Mr. Stephen G. Frantz, Director | |||
Reed Reactor Facility | |||
Reed College | |||
3203 S.E. Woodstock Boulevard | |||
Portland, Oregon 97202-8199 | |||
4 | |||
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-288/97 202 AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION | |||
Dear Mr. Frantz: | |||
This refers to the inspection conducted on December 15-18,1997, at your TRIGA Mark l | |||
research reactor facility. *lhe inspection included a review of activities authorized for your | |||
facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. | |||
Various aspects of your safety program were inspected including selective examinations of | |||
procedures ano representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of | |||
activitios in progress. | |||
As a result of the inspection, four violations were identified. The NRC is concerned because | |||
the violations appear to have been the result of a lack of attention to detail. The violations | |||
, | |||
are cited in ths enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice), and the circumstances surrounding the | |||
violations are described in detailin the enclosed report. | |||
You are required to respond to this lett7; and should follow the instructions specified in the | |||
enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In your response, you should document the | |||
specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to take to prevent recurrence. | |||
After reviewing your response to the Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and | |||
the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement | |||
action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements. | |||
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a cooy of this letter and | |||
its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. | |||
St.ould you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
%'% M M c - | |||
Seymour H. Weiss, Director | |||
Non Power Reactor and Decommissioning | |||
Project Directorate | |||
Division of Reactor Programs Management | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Docket No. 50-288 | |||
License No. R 112 | |||
N | Enclosures: 1. Notice of Violation | ||
2. NRC Inspection Report | |||
cc w/ enclosures: See next page | |||
N | |||
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
[ | [ | ||
- , | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- - - - - - | |||
. . , , | |||
t | |||
Reed College . | |||
Docket 50 288 | |||
cc:- | |||
Director, Oregon Department | |||
of Energy | |||
528 Cottage Street, N.E. | |||
Salem, Oregon 97310 | |||
Mayor of City of Portland | |||
' | |||
1220 Southwest 5th Avenue | |||
Portland, Oregon 97204 | |||
Administrator | |||
Siting and Regulation | |||
' | ' | ||
Oregon Department of Energy | |||
Labor and Industries Building | |||
Room 111 | |||
Salem, Oregon 97310 | |||
Peter Steinberger Ph.D. | |||
I | |||
Dean of the Faculty | |||
3203 S.E. Woodstock Boulevard | |||
Portland, Oregon 97202 8199 | |||
Dr. Steven S. Koblik, President | |||
Reed Reactor Facility | |||
3203 S.E. Woodstock Boulevard | |||
Portland, Oregon- 97?O2-8199 | |||
Oregon Department of Energy | |||
ATTN: David Stewart-Smith, Director | |||
Division of Radiation Control | |||
625 Marion Street, N.E. | |||
Salem,' Oregon 97310 | |||
Test, Research and Training | |||
Reactor Newsletter | |||
202 Nuclear Sciences Center | |||
University of Florida | |||
Gainesville, Florida 32611 | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:28, 10 December 2024
| ML20199C087 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Reed College |
| Issue date: | 01/23/1998 |
| From: | Weiss S NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Frantz S REED COLLEGE, PORTLAND, OR |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20199C091 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-288-97-202, NUDOCS 9801290127 | |
| Download: ML20199C087 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000288/1997202
Text
'
'
'
..
.
.
[ :j .%.fl
l
^
s$
_
4 ( A . . i
. .hi .. .A N.E-
u r wu% .5
MM
'
g
8
-
..
"""U 2b N
Mr. Stephen G. Frantz, Director
Reed Reactor Facility
.;
-
Reed College
Ig
3203 S.E. Woodstock Boulevard
3 g
Portland, Oregon 97202-8199
i
.g
. m
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-288/97-202 AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION
5d
a
Dear Mr. Frantz:
i
i
This refers to tho inspection conducted on December 15-18, 1397, at your TRIGA Mark-l
V
research reactor facility. The inspectian included a review of activities authorized for your
g
f acility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection.
a
Vuious ccoects of your safety program were inspected including selective examinations of
j
procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
, mi
.__
activities in progress.
As a result of tne inspection, four violations were identified. The NRC is concerned because
$
the violations appear to have been the result of a lack of attention to detail. The violations
'
are cited in the e :losed Notice of Violation (Notice), and the circumstances surrounding the
violations are described in detail in the enclosed report.
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the
!
enclosed Notice when preparing vour response. In your response, you should document the
specific actions taken and any additional acticrs you plan to take to prevent recurrence.
- $
After reviewing your response to the Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and
]
the results of tuture inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement
3
action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
3
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and
g-
its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions conceining this letter, please contact us.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY: Marvin Mendonca for
Seymour H. Weiss, Director
g
Non-Pov qr Reactor and Decommissianing
j
Project Directorate
Division of Reactor Programs Management
Oifice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
d
Docket No. 50-288
---
License No. R-112
-
h
h
Enclosures: 1. Notice of Violation
f
b' _ ,
f
@ **""
2. NRC Inspection Repon
M
Y
cc w/ enclosures:
See next page
DISTRIBUTION:
,
HARD COPY
Docket File 50-288 SWeiss
E-M All
I
PUBLIC
CBassett
AAdarns
WEresian
$
PDND r/f
EHylton
TBurdick
SHolmes
DScrenci, (2)
BJones
PDoyle
Pisaac
1
WDean, OEDO
Nuciear Safety
MMendonce
TMichaels
g g
=
JRoe
Information Center
TDragoun
, ,
)
3
- j.
b
'
-
POND:RI
fpMD:LA
PbMD:D
\\
CBpssett
Effylton
Sweiss
--
'
1/la/98
1/ 2/98
1 @ 98
?
2
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
i
DOCUMENT NAME: G\\SECY\\BASSETT\\VIOLATIO
M
9801290127 980123
l
h
Dr.
ADOCK 0500
8
,
_ .... . . . _ _ . . . . , _
. . . .
u
.
5
. _ _ - _.
~ e 9'
gganaroqk
'
UNITED STATES
,y!
'j
NUCLEAP, REGULATORY COMMISSION
s
WASHINGTON, o.C. 2006H001
%.....
January 23, 1998
Mr. Stephen G. Frantz, Director
Reed Reactor Facility
Reed College
3203 S.E. Woodstock Boulevard
Portland, Oregon 97202-8199
4
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-288/97 202 AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Dear Mr. Frantz:
This refers to the inspection conducted on December 15-18,1997, at your TRIGA Mark l
research reactor facility. *lhe inspection included a review of activities authorized for your
facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection.
Various aspects of your safety program were inspected including selective examinations of
procedures ano representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
activitios in progress.
As a result of the inspection, four violations were identified. The NRC is concerned because
the violations appear to have been the result of a lack of attention to detail. The violations
,
are cited in ths enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice), and the circumstances surrounding the
violations are described in detailin the enclosed report.
You are required to respond to this lett7; and should follow the instructions specified in the
enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In your response, you should document the
specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to take to prevent recurrence.
After reviewing your response to the Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and
the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement
action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a cooy of this letter and
its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
St.ould you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.
Sincerely,
%'% M M c -
Seymour H. Weiss, Director
Non Power Reactor and Decommissioning
Project Directorate
Division of Reactor Programs Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Docket No. 50-288
License No. R 112
Enclosures: 1. Notice of Violation
2. NRC Inspection Report
cc w/ enclosures: See next page
N
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[
- ,
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - - - - -
. . , ,
t
Reed College .
Docket 50 288
cc:-
Director, Oregon Department
of Energy
528 Cottage Street, N.E.
Salem, Oregon 97310
Mayor of City of Portland
'
1220 Southwest 5th Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97204
Administrator
Siting and Regulation
'
Oregon Department of Energy
Labor and Industries Building
Room 111
Salem, Oregon 97310
Peter Steinberger Ph.D.
I
Dean of the Faculty
3203 S.E. Woodstock Boulevard
Portland, Oregon 97202 8199
Dr. Steven S. Koblik, President
Reed Reactor Facility
3203 S.E. Woodstock Boulevard
Portland, Oregon- 97?O2-8199
Oregon Department of Energy
ATTN: David Stewart-Smith, Director
Division of Radiation Control
625 Marion Street, N.E.
Salem,' Oregon 97310
Test, Research and Training
Reactor Newsletter
202 Nuclear Sciences Center
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida 32611