ML20239A195: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter::*
{{#Wiki_filter::*
* Mr. J mes Knubel                                       ~ August 31, 1998 Chief Nuclear Officer Power Authority of tha Stria of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601
Mr. J mes Knubel
~ August 31, 1998 Chief Nuclear Officer Power Authority of tha Stria of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT- REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONTROL ROD BOLTING RELIEF REQUEST (TAC NO. MA1764)                                                                         I
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT-REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONTROL ROD BOLTING RELIEF REQUEST (TAC NO. MA1764)
                                                                                                                            )
I
)


==Dear Mr. Knubel:==
==Dear Mr. Knubel:==
 
1 On May 8,1998, the New York Power Authority (also known as the Power Authority of the State of Now York) submitted a request for relief from inservice inspection requirements for control rod bolting at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The NRC staff, with the assistance of its contractor, INEEL, has determined that additional information will be required to complete its review of this relief request. The information required is described in the enclosure to this letter.
1 On May 8,1998, the New York Power Authority (also known as the Power Authority of the State of Now York) submitted a request for relief from inservice inspection requirements for control rod bolting at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The NRC staff, with the assistance of its contractor, INEEL, has determined that additional information will be required to complete its review of this relief request. The information required is described in the enclosure to this letter.         ,
To expedite the review process, please provide a copy of your response directly to INEEL at the following address:
To expedite the review process, please provide a copy of your response directly to INEEL at the following address:
MichaelT. Anderson
MichaelT. Anderson
                                      ' INEEL Research Center 2151 North Boulevard P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-2209
' INEEL Research Center 2151 North Boulevard P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-2209 As discussed with Mr. Art Zaremba on August 27,1998, please provide the requested information by September 14,1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 415-1470.
:            As discussed with Mr. Art Zaremba on August 27,1998, please provide the requested information by September 14,1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 415-1470.
Sincerely, original signed by:
Sincerely, original signed by:
I Joseph F. Williams, Project Manager                         )
I Joseph F. Williams, Project Manager
Project Directorate 1-1                                       ;
)
_            Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11                         j 9909090309 990831                                     Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation                         I PDR     ADOCK 05000333                                                                                             '
Project Directorate 1-1 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 j
!        O                        PDR
9909090309 990831 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation I
!            Docket No. 50-333
PDR ADOCK 05000333 O
PDR Docket No. 50-333


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
Request for Additional                           r.m ~ y. c Information                                 iOm fi i a _              _
Request for Additional r.m ~
                                                                                                            $        k l cc w/ encl: See next page                                             "
y.
DISTRIBUTION                                                                                         g)
c Information iOm fi i a _
Docket File       J. Zwolinski         J. Williams             C. Hehl, Region 1                     -
k l cc w/ encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION g)
PUBlic           S. Bajwa             OGC                                                                     l PDI-1 R/F         S. Little           ACRS DOCUMENT NAME: G:\FITZWtA1764.RAI To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment /enclosurt "N" = No copy 0FFICE   Pet: POI-1 M       lE LA:PDI 1 60         l     D:PDI 1 ,p [ h     l                   l                   l IWWEE     JWittlem(/tec           Slittle #               SBajwe _h W DATE     08/ 7/ /98               08/St /98               08/10 /98               08/ /98             08/ /98
Docket File J. Zwolinski J. Williams C. Hehl, Region 1 PUBlic S. Bajwa OGC l
                          ..  -05
PDI-1 R/F S. Little ACRS DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\FITZWtA1764.RAI To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment /enclosurt "N" = No copy 0FFICE Pet: POI-1 M lE LA:PDI 1 60 l
D:PDI 1,p [ h l
l l
IWWEE JWittlem(/tec Slittle #
SBajwe _h W DATE 08/ 7/ /98 08/St /98 08/10 /98 08/ /98 08/ /98
-05


p      -
Mr. James Knubel August 31, 1998 p
Mr. James Knubel                                                           August 31, 1998 l
Chi:f Nucie:r Officer a
a Chi:f Nucie:r Officer Power Authority of the Stat 3 of j               New York i               123 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601
l Power Authority of the Stat 3 of j
New York i
123 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Line 55: Line 63:


==Dear Mr. Knubel:==
==Dear Mr. Knubel:==
 
On May 8,1998, the New York Power Authority (also known as the Power Authority of the State of New York) submitted a request for relief from inservice inspection requirements for control rod botting at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The NRC staff, with the assistance of its contractor, INEEL, has determined that additional information will be required to complete its review of this relief request. The information required is described in the enclosure to this letter.
On May 8,1998, the New York Power Authority (also known as the Power Authority of the State                               -
To expedite the review process, please provide a copy of your response directly to INEEL at the j
of New York) submitted a request for relief from inservice inspection requirements for control rod botting at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The NRC staff, with the assistance of its contractor, INEEL, has determined that additional information will be required to complete its review of this relief request. The information required is described in the enclosure to this letter.
following address:
To expedite the review process, please provide a copy of your response directly to INEEL at the                           j following address:
MichaelT. Anderson INEEL Research Center 2151 North Boulevard P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-2209 As discussed with Mr. Art Zaremba on August 27,1998, please provide the requested information by September 14,1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 4151470.
MichaelT. Anderson INEEL Research Center 2151 North Boulevard P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-2209 As discussed with Mr. Art Zaremba on August 27,1998, please provide the requested information by September 14,1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 4151470.
Sincerely, original signed by:
Sincerely, original signed by:
Joseph F. Williams, Project Manager Project Directorate 1-1                       ,
Joseph F. Williams, Project Manager Project Directorate 1-1 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-333
Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-333


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
Request for Additional Information i                                                                                                                                       I cc w/ encl: See next page
Request for Additional Information i
!              DISTRIBUTION.
I cc w/ encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION.
l Docket File         J. Zwolinski               J. Williams                     C. Hehl, Region i PUBLIC               S. Bajwa                   OGC                                                                     I PDI-1 R/F           S. Little                   ACRS DOCUMENT NAME: G:\FITZWIA1764.RAI To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with att chment/ enclosure, "N" = No copy 0FFICE   PM:PDI 1 f D'       lE LA PDI 1 oV                   l D PDI 1 , f A             l                 l             l NAME     JWittlanu(/lec           SLittle W                       $8ajwa hW DATE     08/ 3/ /98               08/ $ /98                       08/16 /98                     08/ /98         08/ /98
l Docket File J. Zwolinski J. Williams C. Hehl, Region i PUBLIC S. Bajwa OGC I
__                --            _ - - -              _                          -        _      -- -                    A
PDI-1 R/F S. Little ACRS DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\FITZWIA1764.RAI To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with att chment/ enclosure, "N" = No copy 0FFICE PM:PDI 1 f D' lE LA PDI 1 oV l
D PDI 1, f A l
l l
NAME JWittlanu(/lec SLittle W
$8ajwa hW DATE 08/ 3/ /98 08/ $ /98 08/16 /98 08/ /98 08/ /98 A


puto j
puto j
[                                                                 %                                  UNITED STATES g                                                                 ,jp                NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 3088H001
[
                **,.*/                                                                                 August 31, 1998 Mr. James Knubel Chief Nuclear Officer Power Authority of the State of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601
UNITED STATES g
,j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p
WASHINGTON, D.C. 3088H001
**,.*/
August 31, 1998 Mr. James Knubel Chief Nuclear Officer Power Authority of the State of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Line 78: Line 92:


==Dear Mr. Knubel:==
==Dear Mr. Knubel:==
 
On May 8,1998, the New York Power Authority (also known as the Power Authority of the State of New York) submitted a request for relief from inservice inspection requirements for control rod bolting at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The NRC staff, with the assistance of its contractor, INEEL, has determined that additional information will be required to complete its review of this relief request. The information required is described in the enclosure to this letter.
On May 8,1998, the New York Power Authority (also known as the Power Authority of the State of New York) submitted a request for relief from inservice inspection requirements for control rod bolting at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The NRC staff, with the assistance of
'                        its contractor, INEEL, has determined that additional information will be required to complete its review of this relief request. The information required is described in the enclosure to this letter.
To expedite the review process, please provide a copy of your response directly to INEEL at the following address:
To expedite the review process, please provide a copy of your response directly to INEEL at the following address:
MichaelT. Anderson INEEL Research Center 2151 North Boulevard P.O. Box 1625 ldaho Falls, Idaho 83415-2209 As discussed with Mr. Art Zaremba on August 27,1998, please provide the requested information by September 14,1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 415-1470.
MichaelT. Anderson INEEL Research Center 2151 North Boulevard P.O. Box 1625 ldaho Falls, Idaho 83415-2209 As discussed with Mr. Art Zaremba on August 27,1998, please provide the requested information by September 14,1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 415-1470.
Sincerely, a
Sincerely, a
i Joseph F. Williams, Project Manager Project Directorate 1-1 Division of Reactor Projects - t/11
i Joseph F. Williams, Project Manager Project Directorate 1-1 Division of Reactor Projects - t/11
(                                                                                                               Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-333
(
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-333


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
Request for Additional Information cc w/ encl: See next page                                                                                                                                       ;
Request for Additional Information cc w/ encl: See next page l
l L
L


(
3 James Knubel James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear l
3
Power Authority of the State Power Plant L
James Knubel                       James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear l   Power Authority of the State         Power Plant L
of New York cc:
of New York
Mr. Gerald C. Goldstein Regional Administrator, Region I Assistant General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Power Authority of the State 475 Allendale Road of New York King of Prussia, PA 19406 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019 Mr. F. William Valentino, President l
cc:
New York State Energy, Research, Resident inspector's Office and Development Authority U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Corporate Plaza West P.O. Box 136 286 Washington Avenue Extension Lycoming, NY 13093 Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. Harry P. Salmon, Jr.
Mr. Gerald C. Goldstein             Regional Administrator, Region I
Mr. Richard L. Patch, Director Vice President - Engineering Quality Assurance Power Authority of the State Power Authority of the State of New York of New York 123 Main Street 123 Main Street l
Assistant General Counsel           U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Power Authority of the State       475 Allendale Road of New York King of Prussia, PA 19406 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019                 Mr. F. William Valentino, President l
White Plains, NY 10601 White Plains, NY 10601 Ms. Charlene D. Faison Mr. Gerard Goering l
New York State Energy, Research, Resident inspector's Office         and Development Authority U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Corporate Plaza West P.O. Box 136                       286 Washington Avenue Extension Lycoming, NY 13093                 Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. Harry P. Salmon, Jr.           Mr. Richard L. Patch, Director Vice President - Engineering         Quality Assurance Power Authority of the State       Power Authority of the State of New York                         of New York 123 Main Street                     123 Main Street l   White Plains, NY 10601             White Plains, NY 10601 Ms. Charlene D. Faison             Mr. Gerard Goering l   Director Nuclear Licensing         28112 Bayview Drive Power Authority of the State       Red Wing, MN 55066 of New York                                                           -
Director Nuclear Licensing 28112 Bayview Drive Power Authority of the State Red Wing, MN 55066 of New York l
123 Main Street                     Mr. James Gagliardo
123 Main Street Mr. James Gagliardo White Plains, NY 10601 Safety Review Committee 708 Castlewood Avenue Supervisor Arlington,TX 76012 Town of Scriba Route 8, Box 382 Mr. Arthur Zaremba, Licensing Manager Oswego, NY 13126 James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Mr. Eugene W. Zeltmann P.O. Box 41 President and Chief Operating Lycoming, NY 13093 Officer Power Authority of the State Mr. Paul Eddy of New Yo*
White Plains, NY 10601             Safety Review Committee 708 Castlewood Avenue Supervisor                         Arlington,TX 76012 Town of Scriba Route 8, Box 382                   Mr. Arthur Zaremba, Licensing Manager Oswego, NY 13126                   James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Mr. Eugene W. Zeltmann             P.O. Box 41 President and Chief Operating       Lycoming, NY 13093 Officer Power Authority of the State       Mr. Paul Eddy of New Yo*                         New York State Dept. of 99 Washington Ave., Suite No. 2005   Public Service
New York State Dept. of 99 Washington Ave., Suite No. 2005 Public Service Albany, NY 12210-2820 3 Empire State Plaza,10th Floor Albany, NY 12223 Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attomey General Michael J. Colomb New York Department of Law Site Executive Officer j
Albany, NY 12210-2820               3 Empire State Plaza,10th Floor Albany, NY 12223 Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attomey General           Michael J. Colomb New York Department of Law         Site Executive Officer                     j 120 Broadway                       James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant   j New Yo&, NY 10271                   P.O. Box 41                               i Lycoming, NY 13093
120 Broadway James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant j
New Yo&, NY 10271 P.O. Box 41 i
Lycoming, NY 13093
?
?
                                                                                  \
\\
l l                                                                                  )
l
)


P.
P.
s 3
s 3
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING RELIEF REQUESTS Raouest for Additional Information (RAI) on the Third 10-Year Intemal inservice insoection (ISI)
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING RELIEF REQUESTS Raouest for Additional Information (RAI) on the Third 10-Year Intemal inservice insoection (ISI)
Request for Authonzation RR-14
Request for Authonzation RR-14 1.
: 1. Scope / Status of Raving Throughout the service life of a water-cooled nuclear power facility,10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4) requires that components (including supports) that are classified as American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 meet the requirements, except design and access provisions and preservice examination requirements, set forth in the ASME Code, Section XI, " Rules for Inservice inspection of Nuclear Power Plant l       Components," to the extent practical within the limitations of design, geometry, and materials of l       construction of the components. This section of the regulations also requires that inservice examinations of components and system pressure tests conducted during successive 120-month l       inspection intervals comply with the requirements in the latest edition and addenda of the Code l       incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) on the date 12 months prior to the start of the j       interval, subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein. The components (including l       supports) may meet examination requirements set forth in subsequent editions and addenda of the Code that are incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein and subject to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval. The licensee, New York Power Authority, prepared the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant third 10-year interval program plan to meet the requirements of the 1989 Edition of the ASME Code Section XI. The third 10-year interval began in June 1997.
Scope / Status of Raving Throughout the service life of a water-cooled nuclear power facility,10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4) requires that components (including supports) that are classified as American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 meet the requirements, except design and access provisions and preservice examination requirements, set forth in the ASME Code, Section XI, " Rules for Inservice inspection of Nuclear Power Plant l
As required by 10 CFR 50.55(g)(5), if the licensee determines that certain Code examination requirements are impractical and requests relief, the licensee shall submit information to the i
Components," to the extent practical within the limitations of design, geometry, and materials of l
NRC to support that determination.
construction of the components. This section of the regulations also requires that inservice examinations of components and system pressure tests conducted during successive 120-month l
The staff has reviewed the available information for Request for Rclief No. RR-14, submitted l       May 8,1998. Based on this review, the staff has concluded that the information and/or
inspection intervals comply with the requirements in the latest edition and addenda of the Code l
      . clarification described in the next section is required to complete the review of the licensee's request.
incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) on the date 12 months prior to the start of the j
l       2. AddlitonalInformation Required
interval, subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein. The components (including l
: a. Request for Relief No. RR-14 seeks relief from the additional examination requirements of
supports) may meet examination requirements set forth in subsequent editions and addenda of the Code that are incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein and subject to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval. The licensee, New York Power Authority, prepared the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant third 10-year interval program plan to meet the requirements of the 1989 Edition of the ASME Code Section XI. The third 10-year interval began in June 1997.
,              lWB-2430 for control rod drive (CRD) housing bolts. However, the licensee has net l               established the burden of performing these examinations in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii). In addition, the licensee has not explained how the proposed altemative, to replace existing bolting with bolts of a new design, will provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
As required by 10 CFR 50.55(g)(5), if the licensee determines that certain Code examination requirements are impractical and requests relief, the licensee shall submit information to the NRC to support that determination.
i The staff has reviewed the available information for Request for Rclief No. RR-14, submitted l
May 8,1998. Based on this review, the staff has concluded that the information and/or
. clarification described in the next section is required to complete the review of the licensee's request.
l 2.
AddlitonalInformation Required a.
Request for Relief No. RR-14 seeks relief from the additional examination requirements of lWB-2430 for control rod drive (CRD) housing bolts. However, the licensee has net l
established the burden of performing these examinations in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii). In addition, the licensee has not explained how the proposed altemative, to replace existing bolting with bolts of a new design, will provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
Part of the basis for relief explains that replacing all of the remaining 73 CRD mechanism
Part of the basis for relief explains that replacing all of the remaining 73 CRD mechanism
              . bolts would result in approximately 18 person-rom exposure. It appears that this exposure will be accrued regardless of the time frame necessary to complete the replacement of all the bolting. Furthermore, replacing existing cracked bolts with ones of the new design does Enclosure l
. bolts would result in approximately 18 person-rom exposure. It appears that this exposure will be accrued regardless of the time frame necessary to complete the replacement of all the bolting. Furthermore, replacing existing cracked bolts with ones of the new design does Enclosure l


l l ~ to 2-i I
l l ~ to 2-I i
not provide reasonable assurance that the structuralintegrity of the remaining bolts (those in the expanded examination sample) will be maintained. Have crack propagation rates for l                                                         existing cracked bolts been established? What is the schedule for completion of CRD mechanism bolt replacement? Provide information to support the licensee's position that
not provide reasonable assurance that the structuralintegrity of the remaining bolts (those in the expanded examination sample) will be maintained. Have crack propagation rates for l
[                                                         the additional examinations either create a hardship, or that the proposed attemative will provide an acceptable level of quality and safety..                                                                                                             I
existing cracked bolts been established? What is the schedule for completion of CRD mechanism bolt replacement? Provide information to support the licensee's position that
: b.                 The licensee has described a course of action for replacement of existing CRD bolting with I
[
bolts of a new design. It is stated in the Altemate Examination that "the new design bolts may be re-used after a W-1 and augmented surface examination determines that there are no relevant indications." However, the licensee's intentions regarding additional examinations for the new bolting is not clear. Additional examinations for the new bolting should be performed as required by the Code unless otherwise justified. Clarify the scope l                                                         of this request regarding additional examinations to IWB-2430 and bolts of the new design that do not meet the acceptance criteria of IWB-3517.
the additional examinations either create a hardship, or that the proposed attemative will provide an acceptable level of quality and safety..
I b.
The licensee has described a course of action for replacement of existing CRD bolting with I
bolts of a new design. It is stated in the Altemate Examination that "the new design bolts may be re-used after a W-1 and augmented surface examination determines that there are no relevant indications." However, the licensee's intentions regarding additional examinations for the new bolting is not clear. Additional examinations for the new bolting should be performed as required by the Code unless otherwise justified. Clarify the scope l
of this request regarding additional examinations to IWB-2430 and bolts of the new design that do not meet the acceptance criteria of IWB-3517.
I i
I i
I r}}
I r}}

Latest revision as of 05:04, 2 December 2024

Forwards RAI Re 980508 Request for Relief from ISI Requirements for Control Rod Bolting at James Fitzpatrick Npp.Response Requested by 980914
ML20239A195
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick 
Issue date: 08/31/1998
From: Williams J
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: James Knubel
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
References
TAC-MA1764, NUDOCS 9809080309
Download: ML20239A195 (6)


Text

Mr. J mes Knubel

~ August 31, 1998 Chief Nuclear Officer Power Authority of tha Stria of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601

SUBJECT:

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT-REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONTROL ROD BOLTING RELIEF REQUEST (TAC NO. MA1764)

I

)

Dear Mr. Knubel:

1 On May 8,1998, the New York Power Authority (also known as the Power Authority of the State of Now York) submitted a request for relief from inservice inspection requirements for control rod bolting at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The NRC staff, with the assistance of its contractor, INEEL, has determined that additional information will be required to complete its review of this relief request. The information required is described in the enclosure to this letter.

To expedite the review process, please provide a copy of your response directly to INEEL at the following address:

MichaelT. Anderson

' INEEL Research Center 2151 North Boulevard P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-2209 As discussed with Mr. Art Zaremba on August 27,1998, please provide the requested information by September 14,1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 415-1470.

Sincerely, original signed by:

I Joseph F. Williams, Project Manager

)

Project Directorate 1-1 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 j

9909090309 990831 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation I

PDR ADOCK 05000333 O

PDR Docket No. 50-333

Enclosure:

Request for Additional r.m ~

y.

c Information iOm fi i a _

k l cc w/ encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION g)

Docket File J. Zwolinski J. Williams C. Hehl, Region 1 PUBlic S. Bajwa OGC l

PDI-1 R/F S. Little ACRS DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\FITZWtA1764.RAI To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment /enclosurt "N" = No copy 0FFICE Pet: POI-1 M lE LA:PDI 1 60 l

D:PDI 1,p [ h l

l l

IWWEE JWittlem(/tec Slittle #

SBajwe _h W DATE 08/ 7/ /98 08/St /98 08/10 /98 08/ /98 08/ /98

-05

Mr. James Knubel August 31, 1998 p

Chi:f Nucie:r Officer a

l Power Authority of the Stat 3 of j

New York i

123 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601

SUBJECT:

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONTROL ROD BOLTING RELIEF REQUEST (TAC NO. MA1764)

Dear Mr. Knubel:

On May 8,1998, the New York Power Authority (also known as the Power Authority of the State of New York) submitted a request for relief from inservice inspection requirements for control rod botting at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The NRC staff, with the assistance of its contractor, INEEL, has determined that additional information will be required to complete its review of this relief request. The information required is described in the enclosure to this letter.

To expedite the review process, please provide a copy of your response directly to INEEL at the j

following address:

MichaelT. Anderson INEEL Research Center 2151 North Boulevard P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-2209 As discussed with Mr. Art Zaremba on August 27,1998, please provide the requested information by September 14,1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 4151470.

Sincerely, original signed by:

Joseph F. Williams, Project Manager Project Directorate 1-1 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-333

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information i

I cc w/ encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION.

l Docket File J. Zwolinski J. Williams C. Hehl, Region i PUBLIC S. Bajwa OGC I

PDI-1 R/F S. Little ACRS DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\FITZWIA1764.RAI To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with att chment/ enclosure, "N" = No copy 0FFICE PM:PDI 1 f D' lE LA PDI 1 oV l

D PDI 1, f A l

l l

NAME JWittlanu(/lec SLittle W

$8ajwa hW DATE 08/ 3/ /98 08/ $ /98 08/16 /98 08/ /98 08/ /98 A

puto j

[

UNITED STATES g

,j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p

WASHINGTON, D.C. 3088H001

    • ,.*/

August 31, 1998 Mr. James Knubel Chief Nuclear Officer Power Authority of the State of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601

SUBJECT:

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONTROL ROD BOLTING RELIEF REQUEST (TAC NO MA1764) l

Dear Mr. Knubel:

On May 8,1998, the New York Power Authority (also known as the Power Authority of the State of New York) submitted a request for relief from inservice inspection requirements for control rod bolting at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The NRC staff, with the assistance of its contractor, INEEL, has determined that additional information will be required to complete its review of this relief request. The information required is described in the enclosure to this letter.

To expedite the review process, please provide a copy of your response directly to INEEL at the following address:

MichaelT. Anderson INEEL Research Center 2151 North Boulevard P.O. Box 1625 ldaho Falls, Idaho 83415-2209 As discussed with Mr. Art Zaremba on August 27,1998, please provide the requested information by September 14,1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 415-1470.

Sincerely, a

i Joseph F. Williams, Project Manager Project Directorate 1-1 Division of Reactor Projects - t/11

(

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-333

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/ encl: See next page l

L

3 James Knubel James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear l

Power Authority of the State Power Plant L

of New York cc:

Mr. Gerald C. Goldstein Regional Administrator, Region I Assistant General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Power Authority of the State 475 Allendale Road of New York King of Prussia, PA 19406 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019 Mr. F. William Valentino, President l

New York State Energy, Research, Resident inspector's Office and Development Authority U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Corporate Plaza West P.O. Box 136 286 Washington Avenue Extension Lycoming, NY 13093 Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. Harry P. Salmon, Jr.

Mr. Richard L. Patch, Director Vice President - Engineering Quality Assurance Power Authority of the State Power Authority of the State of New York of New York 123 Main Street 123 Main Street l

White Plains, NY 10601 White Plains, NY 10601 Ms. Charlene D. Faison Mr. Gerard Goering l

Director Nuclear Licensing 28112 Bayview Drive Power Authority of the State Red Wing, MN 55066 of New York l

123 Main Street Mr. James Gagliardo White Plains, NY 10601 Safety Review Committee 708 Castlewood Avenue Supervisor Arlington,TX 76012 Town of Scriba Route 8, Box 382 Mr. Arthur Zaremba, Licensing Manager Oswego, NY 13126 James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Mr. Eugene W. Zeltmann P.O. Box 41 President and Chief Operating Lycoming, NY 13093 Officer Power Authority of the State Mr. Paul Eddy of New Yo*

New York State Dept. of 99 Washington Ave., Suite No. 2005 Public Service Albany, NY 12210-2820 3 Empire State Plaza,10th Floor Albany, NY 12223 Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attomey General Michael J. Colomb New York Department of Law Site Executive Officer j

120 Broadway James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant j

New Yo&, NY 10271 P.O. Box 41 i

Lycoming, NY 13093

?

\\

l

)

P.

s 3

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING RELIEF REQUESTS Raouest for Additional Information (RAI) on the Third 10-Year Intemal inservice insoection (ISI)

Request for Authonzation RR-14 1.

Scope / Status of Raving Throughout the service life of a water-cooled nuclear power facility,10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4) requires that components (including supports) that are classified as American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 meet the requirements, except design and access provisions and preservice examination requirements, set forth in the ASME Code,Section XI, " Rules for Inservice inspection of Nuclear Power Plant l

Components," to the extent practical within the limitations of design, geometry, and materials of l

construction of the components. This section of the regulations also requires that inservice examinations of components and system pressure tests conducted during successive 120-month l

inspection intervals comply with the requirements in the latest edition and addenda of the Code l

incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) on the date 12 months prior to the start of the j

interval, subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein. The components (including l

supports) may meet examination requirements set forth in subsequent editions and addenda of the Code that are incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein and subject to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval. The licensee, New York Power Authority, prepared the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant third 10-year interval program plan to meet the requirements of the 1989 Edition of the ASME Code Section XI. The third 10-year interval began in June 1997.

As required by 10 CFR 50.55(g)(5), if the licensee determines that certain Code examination requirements are impractical and requests relief, the licensee shall submit information to the NRC to support that determination.

i The staff has reviewed the available information for Request for Rclief No. RR-14, submitted l

May 8,1998. Based on this review, the staff has concluded that the information and/or

. clarification described in the next section is required to complete the review of the licensee's request.

l 2.

AddlitonalInformation Required a.

Request for Relief No. RR-14 seeks relief from the additional examination requirements of lWB-2430 for control rod drive (CRD) housing bolts. However, the licensee has net l

established the burden of performing these examinations in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii). In addition, the licensee has not explained how the proposed altemative, to replace existing bolting with bolts of a new design, will provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.

Part of the basis for relief explains that replacing all of the remaining 73 CRD mechanism

. bolts would result in approximately 18 person-rom exposure. It appears that this exposure will be accrued regardless of the time frame necessary to complete the replacement of all the bolting. Furthermore, replacing existing cracked bolts with ones of the new design does Enclosure l

l l ~ to 2-I i

not provide reasonable assurance that the structuralintegrity of the remaining bolts (those in the expanded examination sample) will be maintained. Have crack propagation rates for l

existing cracked bolts been established? What is the schedule for completion of CRD mechanism bolt replacement? Provide information to support the licensee's position that

[

the additional examinations either create a hardship, or that the proposed attemative will provide an acceptable level of quality and safety..

I b.

The licensee has described a course of action for replacement of existing CRD bolting with I

bolts of a new design. It is stated in the Altemate Examination that "the new design bolts may be re-used after a W-1 and augmented surface examination determines that there are no relevant indications." However, the licensee's intentions regarding additional examinations for the new bolting is not clear. Additional examinations for the new bolting should be performed as required by the Code unless otherwise justified. Clarify the scope l

of this request regarding additional examinations to IWB-2430 and bolts of the new design that do not meet the acceptance criteria of IWB-3517.

I i

I r