ML20245K145: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - - _ _ _           .__
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - - _ _ _
f                   '.        _
f M
g                       UNITED STATES                                         M f
f g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION fg            l g gg             ,                      usmucrow.n caosos
UNITED STATES fg l g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION gg usmucrow.n caosos DCT 9 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR:+
            '% , , ',', , #                          DCT   9 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR:+     Shat a R. Connelly, Director Office of Inspector and Auditor FROM:                 George A. Mulley, Jr., Assistant Director for Investigations Office of Inspector and Auditor
Shat a R. Connelly, Director Office of Inspector and Auditor FROM:
George A. Mulley, Jr., Assistant Director for Investigations Office of Inspector and Auditor


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Line 28: Line 29:
Sutton called to relay his concern about the operation of Fort St. Vrain.
Sutton called to relay his concern about the operation of Fort St. Vrain.
Sutton reported that he had received information which indicated that Fort St.
Sutton reported that he had received information which indicated that Fort St.
Vrain was not able to achieve a safe shutdown because of the inability of the steam generators to adequately handle the flow of water needed to cool down the reactor from 100% power. Sutton claimed that the NRC' staff was aware of the problem, yet it allowed the reactor to operate for two months (April and May 1986). Sutton further asserted that the staff was not interested in correcting the problem, which according to Sutton could not be corrected, but instead was only interested in developing calculations to justify operating Fort St. Vrain with the deficient generators, t
Vrain was not able to achieve a safe shutdown because of the inability of the steam generators to adequately handle the flow of water needed to cool down the reactor from 100% power.
                              .                            )
Sutton claimed that the NRC' staff was aware of the problem, yet it allowed the reactor to operate for two months (April and May 1986).
                                                              'Q [
Sutton further asserted that the staff was not interested in correcting the problem, which according to Sutton could not be corrected, but instead was only interested in developing calculations to justify operating Fort St. Vrain with the deficient generators, t
_orgeAM1ul P
) 'Q [
y,
P
(    . ,
(
j Assistant Director for investigations Office of Inspector a d Auditor
j
                                                                                                        )
_orgeAM1ul y,
                                                                                                      )(
Assistant Director for investigations Office of Inspector a d Auditor
)
)(
4
4
                                                                                        .e '
.e '
8907050032 890629       %
8907050032 890629 ph
PDR FOIA                Q                                        phy              , \h W v PDR                                                                     ,.
, \\h PDR FOIA Q
BAUMANB7-535
BAUMANB7-535 PDR y
W v


O                                 O OCT   9 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR:     Sharon R. Connelly, Director Office of Inspector and Auditor FROM:               George A. Mulley, Jr., Assistant Director for Investigations Office of Inspector and Auditor
O O
OCT 9 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Sharon R. Connelly, Director Office of Inspector and Auditor FROM:
George A. Mulley, Jr., Assistant Director for Investigations Office of Inspector and Auditor


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ALLEGATION CONCERNING FORT ST. VRAIN On September 26, 1986, I received a telephone call from James Sutton, who was a reactor inspector with Region IV, NRC, until he retired on July 4, 1984.             ,
ALLEGATION CONCERNING FORT ST. VRAIN On September 26, 1986, I received a telephone call from James Sutton, who was a reactor inspector with Region IV, NRC, until he retired on July 4, 1984.
Sutton called to relay his concern about the operation of Fort St. Vrain.
Sutton called to relay his concern about the operation of Fort St. Vrain.
Sutton reported that he had received information which indicated that Fort St.
Sutton reported that he had received information which indicated that Fort St.
Vrain was not able to achieve a safe shutdown because of the inability of the steam generators to adequately handle the flow of water needed to cool down the reactor from 100% power. Sutton claimed that the NRC staff was aware of           ;
Vrain was not able to achieve a safe shutdown because of the inability of the steam generators to adequately handle the flow of water needed to cool down the reactor from 100% power. Sutton claimed that the NRC staff was aware of the problem, yet it allowed the reactor to operate for two months (April and j
the problem, yet it allowed the reactor to operate for two months (April and           j May 1986). Sutton further asserted that the staff was not interested in               {
May 1986).
Sutton further asserted that the staff was not interested in
{
correcting the problem, which according to Sutton could not be corrected, but instead was only interested in developing calculations to justify operating Fort St. Vrain with the deficient generators.
correcting the problem, which according to Sutton could not be corrected, but instead was only interested in developing calculations to justify operating Fort St. Vrain with the deficient generators.
                                                          )                 (     ,
)
G t/r e   t lley,     Ass; ant Director for     estimations Office of Inspector and Auditor DISTRIBUTION:
(
G t/r e t lley, Ass; ant Director for estimations Office of Inspector and Auditor DISTRIBUTION:
OIA READ]NG FILE FILE.186-63:
OIA READ]NG FILE FILE.186-63:
MEM0 TO SHARON/MULLEY OIA GAMulley:kab 10/g /86 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY                                                               l' L
MEM0 TO SHARON/MULLEY OIA GAMulley:kab 10/g /86 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY l'
L


U.s. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMtsstON Othee of Inspector and Auditor o.,..,,,,..<,.....     May 14     I985 Report of Interview OIA CS with agreement          S-2DRISKILL.
U.s. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMtsstON Othee of Inspector and Auditor o.,..,,,,..<,.....
was interviewed                       telephonically regarding his confidentiality He stated essentially as follows:
May 14 I985 Report of Interview OIA CS S-2 was interviewed telephonically regarding his confidentiality agreement with DRISKILL.
He Inspector was atemployed by Brown and Root, Inc. , as a Quality Control (QC) he P k Steam Electric St                       '
He stated essentially as follows:
                                                                                                                            ) from xima                                  met DRISKILL around                                 nd had when he terminated.1ve or six conversations with                                       etweehim the information he provided.He did sign a confidentiality agreemen                                           Ive to technical nature and in his opinion the information reflected d the facility.
He was employed by Brown and Root, Inc., as a Quality Control (QC)
safety of the CPSES and the employees and general public living ne Subsequent to the time he started providing information to DRISKILL and                he noticed an increased amount of pressure being                                       on pla observ           a.            Evert MOUSER by employees of the licensee, als areas                        e licensee was paying increased attention to t e problem inspec                  iscussed with DRISKILL.
Inspector at he P k Steam Electric St
those areas.                             MOUSER and he were the primary QC placed on him increased af                               started although els that                     the pressure being oviding info tion to DRISKILL, there was never any eason tiality had been compromised, and                                             to believe               confiden-accusing him of supplying informa                                         ver     confr nt         y anyone he NRC.
) from met DRISKILL around when he terminated.1ve or six conversations with him nd had xima etwee the information he provided.He did sign a confidentiality agreemen Ive to technical nature and in his opinion the information reflected the safety of the CPSES and the employees and general public living ne the facility.
question the trust he placed in DRISKILL.                                                   .has no reason to e,s:1
Subsequent to the time he started providing information to DRISKILL he noticed an increased amount of pressure being pla and observ Evert MOUSER by employees of the licensee, on als e licensee was paying increased attention to t e problem a.
                                                                                                    ~
areas iscussed with DRISKILL.
                                                                                                  >w       :'    c
inspec those areas.
                                                                                                '                               L , ; c,
MOUSER and he were the primary QC placed on him increased af els that although the pressure being started oviding info tion to DRISKILL, there was never any eason tiality had been compromised, and to believe confiden-accusing him of supplying informa ver confr nt y anyone he NRC.
                                                                                                  ''. C < . c._ 7 8
.has no reason to question the trust he placed in DRISKILL.
                                                                                              .c
~
                                                                                                          ..XE.f.J [ _l ~ ~
e,s:1 L, ; c,
  %#,t ge t iOm 08'      May 13, 1985 d' -- Bethesda, Md.                                       85-29 I 'f "
>w c
Charles R. Kraus. Investigator. 01A h
'''. C <. c._ 7 8
* aa 's DOC UME N T '$ '"UPf M ' ' 0 6 N ''C
..XE.f.J [ _l ~ ~
                                                                                          ,,,,      , , , ,    May 14, 1985 ou ts.of T t sat ct iv ,NG AGE NC v
.c May 13, 1985 d' -- Bethesda, Md.
                                              '' L tOA Wi f =Ou          NE D et avist*CN  05 T O ANO'*** " A C,f NC ' 'T A NO + 75 C ON T E N TS A N E N T et Os 5 *C E ns .NSPE ct on ANO avo r t e n
%#,t ge t iOm 08' I 'f "
85-29 Charles R. Kraus. Investigator. 01A h
* aa 's DOC UME N T '$ '"UPf M ' ' 0 6 N ''C May 14, 1985
'' L OA NE D T O ANO'*** " A C,f NC ' 'T A NO + 75 C ON T E N TS A N E N ou ts.of T t sat ct iv,NG AGE NC v Wi f =Ou t et avist*CN 05 T et Os 5 *C E ns.NSPE ct on ANO avo r t e n


t~
f %,,'6, g
4  f %,,'6, g                 UNIT E D sT AT F s
;,5 t~
                                                                                                                  ;,5 l                    5                                            NUCLEAR REGULA10RY COMMISSION
UNIT E D sT AT F s 4
                    $ '.* ''.')f' 1I WASmNGTON O C. 205%
5 I
                    %                /
WASmNGTON O C. 205%
                      \ ,. ,,,,  #                                Office of Inspector and Auditor CASE  
$ '.* ''. f' 1 NUCLEAR REGULA10RY COMMISSION l
')
/
\\,.
Office of Inspector and Auditor CASE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
 
Ccmnche Peak (D. Drinkill discloncd File No.: Ina 85-1).,
TITLE:      Ccmnche Peak (D. Drinkill discloncd                                               File No.: Ina 85-1).,
TITLE:
confidential info)                                                                               1/16/85 Date Opened:~ G. Mulley Investigator:
confidential info)
1/s h ,     c Kr aw E.
Date Opened:~ G. Mulley 1/16/85 Investigator:
NRC REGION:                                                                                 Inspecticn:
1/s h,
SITE: Cannche Peak                                                                     Investigation:
c Kr aw E.
NRC REGION:
Inspecticn:
SITE: Cannche Peak Investigation:
(criminal-integrity-DD-other)
(criminal-integrity-DD-other)
Review:
Review:
Line 95: Line 116:
CONTRACTOR:
CONTRACTOR:
ALLEGATION: Durin3 a January 5,1985, deposition of Mr. Evert Mouser, a fomer cc inspector at Ccmnche Peak, he alleged that Mr. Donald Driskill, OI Investigator,1rtproperly discloscri confidential infonction to the Applicants.
ALLEGATION: Durin3 a January 5,1985, deposition of Mr. Evert Mouser, a fomer cc inspector at Ccmnche Peak, he alleged that Mr. Donald Driskill, OI Investigator,1rtproperly discloscri confidential infonction to the Applicants.
DATES:                                                   SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS 1/10/85             Memo fran Scinto to Hayes, subject alme.
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS DATES:
1/16/85             Arsigned to Geonje Mulley.
1/10/85 Memo fran Scinto to Hayes, subject alme.
1/26/85             Reviewed memo and attached testimony of Mouser. Information alleces that Driskill provided confidential information to the applicant. There is no indication that Driskill violated the confidentiality of any confidential source. Because NRC policy is to protect the identity of the source of information and not the information itself,                           there is nothing to indicate that Driskill's actions were improper. Consequently, there is no basis for an OIA investigation.                 Prepared memo to Deputy Director recommending this matter be closed in the files of this office.
1/16/85 Arsigned to Geonje Mulley.
l llft/f6                   M         o s-   a b ( . i. . l I'J NY*
1/26/85 Reviewed memo and attached testimony of Mouser. Information alleces that Driskill provided confidential information to the applicant. There is no indication that Driskill violated the confidentiality of any confidential source. Because NRC policy is to protect the identity of the source of information and not the information itself, there is nothing to indicate that Driskill's actions were improper. Consequently, there is no basis for an OIA investigation.
                  <1/vi/> c       -
Prepared memo to Deputy Director recommending this matter be closed in the files of this office.
7l, l ~ . . n.- D.. A //                                   :nto7agg;ca ;n IhU TOC 0rd vl:s dig,*;d it/) r/h y-   '
l llft/f6 M
b tArsctm -         ,f/), a . _Sr ;...                       in DCCCidance with thecd f'b                                                                           r$$h C//C               dn{f 79 f r$'
o s-a b (. i.. l I'J NY*
                                                                                                                                                      /
<1/vi/> c 7l, l ~.. n.-
D.. A //
:nto7agg;ca ;n IhU TOC 0rd vl:s dig,*;d it/) r/h y-b tArsctm -
,f/), a. _Sr ;...
in DCCCidance with thecd f'b r$$h C//C dn{f 79 f r$'
/
i}}
i}}

Latest revision as of 00:56, 2 December 2024

Discusses 860926 Telcon W/J Sutton Re Operation of Plant. Sutton Reported Receiving Info Which Indicated Facility Not Able to Achieve Safe Shutdown Because of Inability of Steam Generators to Handle Flow of Water Needed to Cool Reactor
ML20245K145
Person / Time
Site: Fort Saint Vrain 
Issue date: 10/09/1986
From: Mulley G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTOR & AUDITOR (OIA)
To: Connelly S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTOR & AUDITOR (OIA)
Shared Package
ML20245K137 List:
References
FOIA-87-535 NUDOCS 8907050032
Download: ML20245K145 (4)
v • d • e


Text

_ - - _ _ _

f M

f g

UNITED STATES fg l g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION gg usmucrow.n caosos DCT 9 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR:+

Shat a R. Connelly, Director Office of Inspector and Auditor FROM:

George A. Mulley, Jr., Assistant Director for Investigations Office of Inspector and Auditor

SUBJECT:

ALLEGATION CONCERNING FORT ST. VRAIN On September 26, 1986, I received a telephone call from James Sutton, who was a reactor inspector with Region IV, NRC, until he retired on July 4, 1984.

Sutton called to relay his concern about the operation of Fort St. Vrain.

Sutton reported that he had received information which indicated that Fort St.

Vrain was not able to achieve a safe shutdown because of the inability of the steam generators to adequately handle the flow of water needed to cool down the reactor from 100% power.

Sutton claimed that the NRC' staff was aware of the problem, yet it allowed the reactor to operate for two months (April and May 1986).

Sutton further asserted that the staff was not interested in correcting the problem, which according to Sutton could not be corrected, but instead was only interested in developing calculations to justify operating Fort St. Vrain with the deficient generators, t

) 'Q [

P

(

j

_orgeAM1ul y,

Assistant Director for investigations Office of Inspector a d Auditor

)

)(

4

.e '

8907050032 890629 ph

, \\h PDR FOIA Q

BAUMANB7-535 PDR y

W v

O O

OCT 9 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Sharon R. Connelly, Director Office of Inspector and Auditor FROM:

George A. Mulley, Jr., Assistant Director for Investigations Office of Inspector and Auditor

SUBJECT:

ALLEGATION CONCERNING FORT ST. VRAIN On September 26, 1986, I received a telephone call from James Sutton, who was a reactor inspector with Region IV, NRC, until he retired on July 4, 1984.

Sutton called to relay his concern about the operation of Fort St. Vrain.

Sutton reported that he had received information which indicated that Fort St.

Vrain was not able to achieve a safe shutdown because of the inability of the steam generators to adequately handle the flow of water needed to cool down the reactor from 100% power. Sutton claimed that the NRC staff was aware of the problem, yet it allowed the reactor to operate for two months (April and j

May 1986).

Sutton further asserted that the staff was not interested in

{

correcting the problem, which according to Sutton could not be corrected, but instead was only interested in developing calculations to justify operating Fort St. Vrain with the deficient generators.

)

(

G t/r e t lley, Ass; ant Director for estimations Office of Inspector and Auditor DISTRIBUTION:

OIA READ]NG FILE FILE.186-63:

MEM0 TO SHARON/MULLEY OIA GAMulley:kab 10/g /86 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY l'

L

U.s. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMtsstON Othee of Inspector and Auditor o.,..,,,,..<,.....

May 14 I985 Report of Interview OIA CS S-2 was interviewed telephonically regarding his confidentiality agreement with DRISKILL.

He stated essentially as follows:

He was employed by Brown and Root, Inc., as a Quality Control (QC)

Inspector at he P k Steam Electric St

) from met DRISKILL around when he terminated.1ve or six conversations with him nd had xima etwee the information he provided.He did sign a confidentiality agreemen Ive to technical nature and in his opinion the information reflected the safety of the CPSES and the employees and general public living ne the facility.

Subsequent to the time he started providing information to DRISKILL he noticed an increased amount of pressure being pla and observ Evert MOUSER by employees of the licensee, on als e licensee was paying increased attention to t e problem a.

areas iscussed with DRISKILL.

inspec those areas.

MOUSER and he were the primary QC placed on him increased af els that although the pressure being started oviding info tion to DRISKILL, there was never any eason tiality had been compromised, and to believe confiden-accusing him of supplying informa ver confr nt y anyone he NRC.

.has no reason to question the trust he placed in DRISKILL.

~

e,s:1 L, ; c,

>w c

. C <. c._ 7 8

..XE.f.J [ _l ~ ~

.c May 13, 1985 d' -- Bethesda, Md.

%#,t ge t iOm 08' I 'f "

85-29 Charles R. Kraus. Investigator. 01A h

  • aa 's DOC UME N T '$ '"UPf M ' ' 0 6 N C May 14, 1985

L OA NE D T O ANO'*** " A C,f NC ' 'T A NO + 75 C ON T E N TS A N E N ou ts.of T t sat ct iv,NG AGE NC v Wi f =Ou t et avist*CN 05 T et Os 5 *C E ns.NSPE ct on ANO avo r t e n

f %,,'6, g

,5 t~

UNIT E D sT AT F s 4

5 I

WASmNGTON O C. 205%

$ '.* . f' 1 NUCLEAR REGULA10RY COMMISSION l

')

/

\\,.

Office of Inspector and Auditor CASE

SUMMARY

Ccmnche Peak (D. Drinkill discloncd File No.: Ina 85-1).,

TITLE:

confidential info)

Date Opened:~ G. Mulley 1/16/85 Investigator:

1/s h,

c Kr aw E.

NRC REGION:

Inspecticn:

SITE: Cannche Peak Investigation:

(criminal-integrity-DD-other)

Review:

LICENSEE:

CONTRACTOR:

ALLEGATION: Durin3 a January 5,1985, deposition of Mr. Evert Mouser, a fomer cc inspector at Ccmnche Peak, he alleged that Mr. Donald Driskill, OI Investigator,1rtproperly discloscri confidential infonction to the Applicants.

SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS DATES:

1/10/85 Memo fran Scinto to Hayes, subject alme.

1/16/85 Arsigned to Geonje Mulley.

1/26/85 Reviewed memo and attached testimony of Mouser. Information alleces that Driskill provided confidential information to the applicant. There is no indication that Driskill violated the confidentiality of any confidential source. Because NRC policy is to protect the identity of the source of information and not the information itself, there is nothing to indicate that Driskill's actions were improper. Consequently, there is no basis for an OIA investigation.

Prepared memo to Deputy Director recommending this matter be closed in the files of this office.

l llft/f6 M

o s-a b (. i.. l I'J NY*

<1/vi/> c 7l, l ~.. n.-

D.. A //

nto7agg;ca ;n IhU TOC 0rd vl:s dig,*;d it/) r/h y-b tArsctm -

,f/), a. _Sr ;...

in DCCCidance with thecd f'b r$$h C//C dn{f 79 f r$'

/

i

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20245K145&oldid=3908184"