ML23055A039: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Robert Kuntz Sent: Friday, February 24, 2023 8:41 AM To: rebecca.steinman@constellation.com | {{#Wiki_filter:From: | ||
Robert Kuntz Sent: | |||
Friday, February 24, 2023 8:41 AM To: | |||
rebecca.steinman@constellation.com | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Amendment to Adopt TSTF-416 (EPID: L-2022-LLA-0017) | Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Amendment to Adopt TSTF-416 (EPID: L-2022-LLA-0017) | ||
By {{letter dated|date=February 3, 2023|text=letter dated February 3, 2023}}, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, submitted an amendment to adopt TSTF-416, Revision 0, "Low Pressure Coolant Injection (LPCI) Valve Alignment Verification Note Location." The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | By {{letter dated|date=February 3, 2023|text=letter dated February 3, 2023}}, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, submitted an amendment to adopt TSTF-416, Revision 0, "Low Pressure Coolant Injection (LPCI) Valve Alignment Verification Note Location." The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an application for an amendment to a license (including the technical specifications) [or construction permit] must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an application for an amendment to a license (including the technical specifications) [or construction permit] must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 50 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is February 24, 2024. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 50 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is February 24, 2024. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application, and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | |||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application, and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Robert F. Kuntz, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Hearing Identifier: | |||
NRR_DRMA Email Number: | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 1959 | 1959 Mail Envelope Properties (SA9PR09MB4640B42731248823A2D791C699A89) | ||
Mail Envelope Properties (SA9PR09MB4640B42731248823A2D791C699A89) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Amendment to Adopt TSTF-416 (EPID L-2022-LLA-0017) | Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Amendment to Adopt TSTF-416 (EPID L-2022-LLA-0017) | ||
Sent Date: 2/24/2023 8:41:13 AM Received Date: 2/24/2023 8:41:00 AM From: Robert Kuntz | Sent Date: | ||
2/24/2023 8:41:13 AM Received Date: | |||
Created By: Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov | 2/24/2023 8:41:00 AM From: | ||
Robert Kuntz Created By: | |||
Recipients: | Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
"rebecca.steinman@constellation.com" <Rebecca.Steinman@constellation.com> | "rebecca.steinman@constellation.com" <Rebecca.Steinman@constellation.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
SA9PR09MB4640.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3215 2/24/2023 8:41:00 AM Options Priority: | |||
Post Office: SA9PR09MB4640.namprd09.prod.outlook.com | Normal Return Notification: | ||
No Reply Requested: | |||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3215 2/24/2023 8:41:00 AM | No Sensitivity: | ||
Normal Expiration Date:}} | |||
Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 10:11, 27 November 2024
| ML23055A039 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 02/24/2023 |
| From: | Robert Kuntz Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Steinman R Exelon Generation Co |
| References | |
| L-2022-LLA-0017 | |
| Download: ML23055A039 (3) | |
Text
From:
Robert Kuntz Sent:
Friday, February 24, 2023 8:41 AM To:
rebecca.steinman@constellation.com
Subject:
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Amendment to Adopt TSTF-416 (EPID: L-2022-LLA-0017)
By letter dated February 3, 2023, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, submitted an amendment to adopt TSTF-416, Revision 0, "Low Pressure Coolant Injection (LPCI) Valve Alignment Verification Note Location." The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an application for an amendment to a license (including the technical specifications) [or construction permit] must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is February 24, 2024. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application, and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Robert F. Kuntz, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_DRMA Email Number:
1959 Mail Envelope Properties (SA9PR09MB4640B42731248823A2D791C699A89)
Subject:
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Amendment to Adopt TSTF-416 (EPID L-2022-LLA-0017)
Sent Date:
2/24/2023 8:41:13 AM Received Date:
2/24/2023 8:41:00 AM From:
Robert Kuntz Created By:
Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:
"rebecca.steinman@constellation.com" <Rebecca.Steinman@constellation.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
SA9PR09MB4640.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3215 2/24/2023 8:41:00 AM Options Priority:
Normal Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date: