ML20247D969: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
< ~ | < ~ | ||
RESPCNSE TO VPMIM DIRECTIVE #E 5 Date: August 29, 1989 Comment Originator: Giorgio Gnugnoli, Project Manager Organization / Telephone Number: USNRC/NMSS/LLWM/LLOB FTS 492-0578 COMMENTS | RESPCNSE TO VPMIM DIRECTIVE #E 5 Date: August 29, 1989 Comment Originator: Giorgio Gnugnoli, Project Manager Organization / Telephone Number: USNRC/NMSS/LLWM/LLOB FTS 492-0578 COMMENTS | ||
: 1. It appears that not all of the NRC comments on the June 27, 1989 have been addressed. All VP directives requiring NRC concurrence should be provided to both Paul Lohaus in NRC Headquarters in Washington, DC as well as to Ramon Hall of the URF0 Denver, Colorado regional office. In our July 13, 1989 transmittal, we pointed this out to you as well as to C.Mantelli(JEG). Your August 18, 1989 letter was addressed to Dennis Sollenberger, who is no longer directly involved with this program, as we formally notified you in a {{letter dated|date=April 14, 1989|text=letter dated April 14, 1989}}. Please make this correction in your records, your staff's records, the TAC records, the RAC records and all other DOE-contractor and subcontractor records. | : 1. It appears that not all of the NRC comments on the June 27, 1989 have been addressed. All VP directives requiring NRC concurrence should be provided to both Paul Lohaus in NRC Headquarters in Washington, DC as well as to Ramon Hall of the URF0 Denver, Colorado regional office. In our July 13, 1989 transmittal, we pointed this out to you as well as to C.Mantelli(JEG). Your {{letter dated|date=August 18, 1989|text=August 18, 1989 letter}} was addressed to Dennis Sollenberger, who is no longer directly involved with this program, as we formally notified you in a {{letter dated|date=April 14, 1989|text=letter dated April 14, 1989}}. Please make this correction in your records, your staff's records, the TAC records, the RAC records and all other DOE-contractor and subcontractor records. | ||
: 2. It is not clear from your redraft of this directive, whether you consider the NRC an implementing agency. As we mentioned before, the NRC shall make every reasonable attempt to respond to these directives within the 15-day turnaround response time. It should be clearly understood that NRC concurrence cannot be tacitly assumed, if the 15-day response time is not met. It is not clear from your revised directive that you understand this. | : 2. It is not clear from your redraft of this directive, whether you consider the NRC an implementing agency. As we mentioned before, the NRC shall make every reasonable attempt to respond to these directives within the 15-day turnaround response time. It should be clearly understood that NRC concurrence cannot be tacitly assumed, if the 15-day response time is not met. It is not clear from your revised directive that you understand this. | ||
/ | / |
Latest revision as of 17:44, 16 March 2021
ML20247D969 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 08/29/1989 |
From: | Fliegel M, Gnugnoli G, Lohaus P NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
Shared Package | |
ML20247B264 | List: |
References | |
REF-WM-39 NUDOCS 8909150167 | |
Download: ML20247D969 (1) | |
Text
_ _ _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - - -
< ~
RESPCNSE TO VPMIM DIRECTIVE #E 5 Date: August 29, 1989 Comment Originator: Giorgio Gnugnoli, Project Manager Organization / Telephone Number: USNRC/NMSS/LLWM/LLOB FTS 492-0578 COMMENTS
- 1. It appears that not all of the NRC comments on the June 27, 1989 have been addressed. All VP directives requiring NRC concurrence should be provided to both Paul Lohaus in NRC Headquarters in Washington, DC as well as to Ramon Hall of the URF0 Denver, Colorado regional office. In our July 13, 1989 transmittal, we pointed this out to you as well as to C.Mantelli(JEG). Your August 18, 1989 letter was addressed to Dennis Sollenberger, who is no longer directly involved with this program, as we formally notified you in a letter dated April 14, 1989. Please make this correction in your records, your staff's records, the TAC records, the RAC records and all other DOE-contractor and subcontractor records.
- 2. It is not clear from your redraft of this directive, whether you consider the NRC an implementing agency. As we mentioned before, the NRC shall make every reasonable attempt to respond to these directives within the 15-day turnaround response time. It should be clearly understood that NRC concurrence cannot be tacitly assumed, if the 15-day response time is not met. It is not clear from your revised directive that you understand this.
/
.- . ~
Signature: Giorgio Gnugnoit e Approvals: MyronFlieggf4<w.& ,c ,
Paul LohauV v w, AJf us .# 3, n WA[^ g'
, N.B. NO " TRANSMITTAL OF DOCUMENT FORM" WAS PROVIDED!!!!!
PLEASE RETURN WITH " TRANSMITTAL OF DOCUMENT" FORM
======= .................e ...............,=======.......................
FOR UMTRA P0 USE ONLY
' ) COMMENTS REVIEWED AND INCORPORATED
. ] COMMENTS REVIEWED AND NOT INCORPORATED 8909150167 890831 i PDR WASTE WM-39 PDR :
E-_-___ _ _ . -