05000254/FIN-2000008-02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71152 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71152 | ||
| Inspector = M Ring, R Lerch, K Green | | Inspector = M Ring, R Lerch, K Green-Bates | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = The corrective action program was fully functional and typically identified and corrected conditions adverse to quality. In general, station personnel effectively identified and entered problems into the corrective action program using problem identification forms (PIFs). The significance threshold for entering issues into the program appeared appropriate. However, over the past year issues were identified at Quad Cities where the corrective action process was not vigorously implemented to address the issues. In addition, the licensees corrective action process had lost over two items a month since January 2000. Although none of these lost items were considered safety significant, and thousands of other action items were opened and closed in that time frame, this represented a weakness in the licensees program. | | description = The corrective action program was fully functional and typically identified and corrected conditions adverse to quality. In general, station personnel effectively identified and entered problems into the corrective action program using problem identification forms (PIFs). The significance threshold for entering issues into the program appeared appropriate. However, over the past year issues were identified at Quad Cities where the corrective action process was not vigorously implemented to address the issues. In addition, the licensees corrective action process had lost over two items a month since January 2000. Although none of these lost items were considered safety significant, and thousands of other action items were opened and closed in that time frame, this represented a weakness in the licensees program. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:33, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000254/2000008 Section 4OA2 |
| Date counted | Jun 30, 2000 (2000Q2) |
| Type: | Finding: |
| cornerstone | Miscellaneous |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | M Ring R Lerch K Green-Bates |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |