05000220/FIN-2000003-01: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
| identified by = NRC
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure = IP 71152
| Inspection procedure = IP 71152
| Inspector = B Fuller, M Ferdas, W Cook, J Nick, D Lew, C Sisco, J Carrasco, J Yerokun,
| Inspector = B Fuller, M Ferdas, W Cook, J Nick, D Lew, C Sisco, J Carrasco, J Yerokun
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| INPO aspect =  
| INPO aspect =  
| description = The licensee was effective at identifying and tracking problems. The team did not identify any issues that were not already being tracked by the licensee. However, the team identified seven examples, involving both units, where issues involving equipment failures documented in the Problem Identification process had work orders to conduct the repairs, but no Deviation/Event Reports (DERs) were written, as required by the DER procedure. The failure to initiate DERs is a violation of the Nine Mile Point, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications related to procedure implementation, and is being treated as a Non-Cited Violation. The violation was not assessed using the Significance Determination Process, as it did not impact one of the cornerstones; however, it provides substantive information relative to the cross cutting issue of problem identification and resolution. (Section 4OA2.1)
| description = The licensee was effective at identifying and tracking problems. The team did not identify any issues that were not already being tracked by the licensee. However, the team identified seven examples, involving both units, where issues involving equipment failures documented in the Problem Identification process had work orders to conduct the repairs, but no Deviation/Event Reports (DERs) were written, as required by the DER procedure. The failure to initiate DERs is a violation of the Nine Mile Point, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications related to procedure implementation, and is being treated as a Non-Cited Violation. The violation was not assessed using the Significance Determination Process, as it did not impact one of the cornerstones; however, it provides substantive information relative to the cross cutting issue of problem identification and resolution. (Section 4OA2.1)
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 20:27, 20 February 2018

01
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Report IR 05000220/2000003 Section 4OA1
Date counted Jun 30, 2000 (2000Q2)
Type: NCV:
cornerstone Miscellaneous
Identified by: NRC identified
Inspection Procedure: IP 71152
Inspectors (proximate) B Fuller
M Ferdas
W Cook
J Nick
D Lew
C Sisco
J Carrasco
J Yerokun
INPO aspect
'