ML20134B758: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:__
C REGIONAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST FORM Jate: _ 06/27/95 Mail or E-Mail to:      Donald A. Cool, Ph.D. , Director Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS From: __Cynthia D Pederson (CDP 1)__      Region III        .
                                                                              / ,
          .            Director, Nuclear Materials Safety & Safegg      s Licens'e:      IL-01013-01            License No. _v_Not applicable _
D Control No.            N/A      (if applicable)
O Letters dated June 1, 1995 (two with same date); April 27, 1995 and June 7, 1995 0 Suggested change in licensing procedure (encloned) :        N/A 0 Problem / Issue: Illinois received a request from an IL licensee to use sand contaminated with DU in the manufacture of DOT approved shipping containers. They are requesting to distribute these containers as exempt / unregulated products.
O Action Required: IL requesting guidance regarding how the NRC would deal with such a request.
O Recommended Action (with revisions) :        0 Approve    or 0 Reject
            .;t appears that the Commission would not approve this request for the W following reasons:
: 1. Dilution of the DU in concrete to meet the 0.05% by wt. provision for source material, is not an acceptable proposal.
: 2. The material is a vaste product from a licensed operation.
: 3. PS-CP-1 may apply in this case, that is, the request may b frivolous since the DU does not appear to enhance the shielding characteristic of the proposed containers. Further, if distributed as an exempt item these containers may cause a problem if found years from now, since analysis of the concrete would cause concern since the material is in excess of the NRC unrestricted release criteria.
: 4. Even if the applicant applied for a license to distribute the product as a general licensed commodity, justification 5.a., page 2 of the June 1, 1995 letter is not a reasonable argument.        It appears that the average concentration is in excess of 30 pCi/g which is the NRC limit for contaminated soil. Therefore, it is likely that this proposal vould likely increase disposal cost since there volume of material to be disposed of would be greater.
: 5. The analysis protocol & equipment to be used for sampling the DU sand does not appear to be technically sound.
: 6. RIII calculations and physical form of the material all indicate that the DU would not significantly enhance shielding. Additionally, the applicant did not adequately respond to the State request for calculations which would demonstrate that the DU enhanced the shielding.
4
                                                                                          /
mw-o6070                a pp,
 
Remarks:    The request should not be approved.
Headquartcrs Reviewer:
Regional Reviewer: _G . McCann Reviewer Code:      N/A Reviewer Phone No.: (708)_829-9856_ Fax No.: (  )_N/A Request Needed by: 07/31/_95 (date)                  Form TAR-10 8/93 CC OSP J. Lynch Ne 1
I f
)
                                                                        ;}}

Revision as of 22:00, 22 July 2020

Advises That Commission May Not Approve Il Licensee Request to Use Sand Contaminated W/Du in Mfg of DOT Approved Shipping Containers
ML20134B758
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/27/1995
From: Pederson C
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Cool D
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20134B755 List:
References
FOIA-96-409 NUDOCS 9606070064
Download: ML20134B758 (2)


Text

__

C REGIONAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST FORM Jate: _ 06/27/95 Mail or E-Mail to: Donald A. Cool, Ph.D. , Director Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS From: __Cynthia D Pederson (CDP 1)__ Region III .

/ ,

. Director, Nuclear Materials Safety & Safegg s Licens'e: IL-01013-01 License No. _v_Not applicable _

D Control No. N/A (if applicable)

O Letters dated June 1, 1995 (two with same date); April 27, 1995 and June 7, 1995 0 Suggested change in licensing procedure (encloned) : N/A 0 Problem / Issue: Illinois received a request from an IL licensee to use sand contaminated with DU in the manufacture of DOT approved shipping containers. They are requesting to distribute these containers as exempt / unregulated products.

O Action Required: IL requesting guidance regarding how the NRC would deal with such a request.

O Recommended Action (with revisions) : 0 Approve or 0 Reject

.;t appears that the Commission would not approve this request for the W following reasons:

1. Dilution of the DU in concrete to meet the 0.05% by wt. provision for source material, is not an acceptable proposal.
2. The material is a vaste product from a licensed operation.
3. PS-CP-1 may apply in this case, that is, the request may b frivolous since the DU does not appear to enhance the shielding characteristic of the proposed containers. Further, if distributed as an exempt item these containers may cause a problem if found years from now, since analysis of the concrete would cause concern since the material is in excess of the NRC unrestricted release criteria.
4. Even if the applicant applied for a license to distribute the product as a general licensed commodity, justification 5.a., page 2 of the June 1, 1995 letter is not a reasonable argument. It appears that the average concentration is in excess of 30 pCi/g which is the NRC limit for contaminated soil. Therefore, it is likely that this proposal vould likely increase disposal cost since there volume of material to be disposed of would be greater.
5. The analysis protocol & equipment to be used for sampling the DU sand does not appear to be technically sound.
6. RIII calculations and physical form of the material all indicate that the DU would not significantly enhance shielding. Additionally, the applicant did not adequately respond to the State request for calculations which would demonstrate that the DU enhanced the shielding.

4

/

mw-o6070 a pp,

Remarks: The request should not be approved.

Headquartcrs Reviewer:

Regional Reviewer: _G . McCann Reviewer Code: N/A Reviewer Phone No.: (708)_829-9856_ Fax No.: ( )_N/A Request Needed by: 07/31/_95 (date) Form TAR-10 8/93 CC OSP J. Lynch Ne 1

I f

)