ML20137J211: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:. - - - - -. -- - - .-- . - . - - - - - --_- -- | ||
l | |||
******'*******eeoeoea,,, | |||
/>RRECy 'o UNITED STATES l | |||
!' y | |||
: 5. "g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 | |||
* REl_ EASED TO THE PDR 1 ;e b-l cats kkingja!3 | |||
: ....+ | |||
OFFICE OF THE cOuuissioNEn January 21,1997 i | |||
4 MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Jackson | |||
! Commissioner Dieus | |||
: Commissioner Diaz l Commissioner McGaffigan 1 | |||
FROM: Commissioner Rogers Q, l | |||
i i | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
COMSECY-g6 057: MATERIALS / MEDICAL OVERSIGHT - DSI-7 After a review of the Phase ll Stakeholder interschon Report and after listening to the Steering Committee briefing ori January 13, I beheve the Commission's preisminary views on this DSI . | |||
l capture my position relative to NRC's regulabon of Atomic Energy Act (AEA) materials and, in l l | |||
' particular, its program for medical use of those materials. More specifically, I still favor a l | |||
l combination of Option 2 (Continue the ongoing program with improvements) and Ophon 3 (Decrease oversight of low-risk activities with continued emphasis of high-risk schvities). I also l | |||
; continue to support the use of ACMUI and professional medical organizations and societies that was proposed in the Commission's preliminary views. ; | |||
i | |||
! I believe that the changes to 10 CFR Part 35 that would be needed to implement the l 1 | |||
Commission's views should be accornplished through an enhanced participatory process. This would allow a full exploration of views regarding the application of a risk-informed, performance-i based approach to NRC's oversight of medical activities. A significant number of commenters , | |||
favored an expansion of the scope of NRC regulation to include all medical use of rachation. | |||
: While i do not object to this issue being further considered in conjunchon with an enhanced | |||
] participatory rulemaking process, I would not favor re-opening the AEA solely for the purpose of j such an expansion (however, if NRC were to be given broader oversight over OOE, the j ' | |||
authorizing legislation might be used as a vehicle).V'^- | |||
i J | |||
i i cc: EDO j OGC j SECY e | |||
+ | |||
d 1 | |||
l 9704030244 970401 | |||
, PDR NRCSA I}} |
Latest revision as of 23:27, 30 June 2020
ML20137J211 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 02/21/1997 |
From: | Rogers K NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
To: | Diaz N, Dicus G, Shirley Ann Jackson, Mcgaffigan E, The Chairman NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
Shared Package | |
ML20137J180 | List: |
References | |
COMSECY-96-057, COMSECY-96-57, DSI-7, SECY-96-057-C, SECY-96-57-C, NUDOCS 9704030244 | |
Download: ML20137J211 (1) | |
Text
. - - - - -. -- - - .-- . - . - - - - - --_- --
l
- '*******eeoeoea,,,
/>RRECy 'o UNITED STATES l
!' y
- 5. "g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
- REl_ EASED TO THE PDR 1 ;e b-l cats kkingja!3
- ....+
OFFICE OF THE cOuuissioNEn January 21,1997 i
4 MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Jackson
! Commissioner Dieus
- Commissioner Diaz l Commissioner McGaffigan 1
FROM: Commissioner Rogers Q, l
i i
SUBJECT:
COMSECY-g6 057: MATERIALS / MEDICAL OVERSIGHT - DSI-7 After a review of the Phase ll Stakeholder interschon Report and after listening to the Steering Committee briefing ori January 13, I beheve the Commission's preisminary views on this DSI .
l capture my position relative to NRC's regulabon of Atomic Energy Act (AEA) materials and, in l l
' particular, its program for medical use of those materials. More specifically, I still favor a l
l combination of Option 2 (Continue the ongoing program with improvements) and Ophon 3 (Decrease oversight of low-risk activities with continued emphasis of high-risk schvities). I also l
- continue to support the use of ACMUI and professional medical organizations and societies that was proposed in the Commission's preliminary views. ;
i
! I believe that the changes to 10 CFR Part 35 that would be needed to implement the l 1
Commission's views should be accornplished through an enhanced participatory process. This would allow a full exploration of views regarding the application of a risk-informed, performance-i based approach to NRC's oversight of medical activities. A significant number of commenters ,
favored an expansion of the scope of NRC regulation to include all medical use of rachation.
- While i do not object to this issue being further considered in conjunchon with an enhanced
] participatory rulemaking process, I would not favor re-opening the AEA solely for the purpose of j such an expansion (however, if NRC were to be given broader oversight over OOE, the j '
authorizing legislation might be used as a vehicle).V'^-
i J
+
d 1
l 9704030244 970401
, PDR NRCSA I