ML20137J211: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:. - - -                    - -. --              -            -      .--          . - . - - - - - --_-                              --
l
                                                                                                              ******'*******eeoeoea,,,
                    />RRECy 'o                                        UNITED STATES l
                  !' y
: 5.                "g                NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
* REl_ EASED TO THE PDR 1                                      ;e b-l cats kkingja!3
:                        ....+
OFFICE OF THE cOuuissioNEn                                    January 21,1997 i
4 MEMORANDUM TO:                  Chairman Jackson
!                                                        Commissioner Dieus
:                                                        Commissioner Diaz l                                                        Commissioner McGaffigan 1
FROM:                            Commissioner Rogers                              Q, l
i i
 
==SUBJECT:==
COMSECY-g6 057: MATERIALS / MEDICAL OVERSIGHT - DSI-7 After a review of the Phase ll Stakeholder interschon Report and after listening to the Steering Committee briefing ori January 13, I beheve the Commission's preisminary views on this DSI                          .
l capture my position relative to NRC's regulabon of Atomic Energy Act (AEA) materials and, in                        l l
                      ' particular, its program for medical use of those materials. More specifically, I still favor a l
l combination of Option 2 (Continue the ongoing program with improvements) and Ophon 3 (Decrease oversight of low-risk activities with continued emphasis of high-risk schvities). I also                  l
;                      continue to support the use of ACMUI and professional medical organizations and societies that was proposed in the Commission's preliminary views.                                                                  ;
i
!                        I believe that the changes to 10 CFR Part 35 that would be needed to implement the                                  l 1
Commission's views should be accornplished through an enhanced participatory process. This would allow a full exploration of views regarding the application of a risk-informed, performance-i                        based approach to NRC's oversight of medical activities. A significant number of commenters                        ,
favored an expansion of the scope of NRC regulation to include all medical use of rachation.
:                        While i do not object to this issue being further considered in conjunchon with an enhanced
]                        participatory rulemaking process, I would not favor re-opening the AEA solely for the purpose of j                        such an expansion (however, if NRC were to be given broader oversight over OOE, the j            '
authorizing legislation might be used as a vehicle).V'^-
i J
i i                        cc:        EDO j                                    OGC j                                    SECY e
+
d 1
l 9704030244 970401
  ,            PDR      NRCSA I}}

Latest revision as of 23:27, 30 June 2020

Supports Use of ACMUI & Professional Medical Organizations & Societies That Was Proposed in Commission'S Preliminary Views Re DSI-7, Matls/Medical Oversight
ML20137J211
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/21/1997
From: Rogers K
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Diaz N, Dicus G, Shirley Ann Jackson, Mcgaffigan E, The Chairman
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20137J180 List:
References
COMSECY-96-057, COMSECY-96-57, DSI-7, SECY-96-057-C, SECY-96-57-C, NUDOCS 9704030244
Download: ML20137J211 (1)


Text

. - - - - -. -- - - .-- . - . - - - - - --_- --

l

            • '*******eeoeoea,,,

/>RRECy 'o UNITED STATES l

!' y

5. "g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
  • REl_ EASED TO THE PDR 1 ;e b-l cats kkingja!3
....+

OFFICE OF THE cOuuissioNEn January 21,1997 i

4 MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Jackson

! Commissioner Dieus

Commissioner Diaz l Commissioner McGaffigan 1

FROM: Commissioner Rogers Q, l

i i

SUBJECT:

COMSECY-g6 057: MATERIALS / MEDICAL OVERSIGHT - DSI-7 After a review of the Phase ll Stakeholder interschon Report and after listening to the Steering Committee briefing ori January 13, I beheve the Commission's preisminary views on this DSI .

l capture my position relative to NRC's regulabon of Atomic Energy Act (AEA) materials and, in l l

' particular, its program for medical use of those materials. More specifically, I still favor a l

l combination of Option 2 (Continue the ongoing program with improvements) and Ophon 3 (Decrease oversight of low-risk activities with continued emphasis of high-risk schvities). I also l

continue to support the use of ACMUI and professional medical organizations and societies that was proposed in the Commission's preliminary views.  ;

i

! I believe that the changes to 10 CFR Part 35 that would be needed to implement the l 1

Commission's views should be accornplished through an enhanced participatory process. This would allow a full exploration of views regarding the application of a risk-informed, performance-i based approach to NRC's oversight of medical activities. A significant number of commenters ,

favored an expansion of the scope of NRC regulation to include all medical use of rachation.

While i do not object to this issue being further considered in conjunchon with an enhanced

] participatory rulemaking process, I would not favor re-opening the AEA solely for the purpose of j such an expansion (however, if NRC were to be given broader oversight over OOE, the j '

authorizing legislation might be used as a vehicle).V'^-

i J

i i cc: EDO j OGC j SECY e

+

d 1

l 9704030244 970401

, PDR NRCSA I