Regulatory Guide 1.31: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
{{#Wiki_filter:Revision        3 April 1978 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
COMMISSION
                                  REGULATORY GUIDE
REGULATORY  
                                    OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT
GUIDE OFFICE OF STANDARDS  
                                                                      REGULATORY GUIDE 1.31 CONTROL OF FERRITE CONTENT IN
DEVELOPMENT  
                                                              STAINLESS STEEL WELD METAL
REGULATORY  
                                                                                            presence of microfissures. Further investigations re
GUIDE 1.31 CONTROL OF FERRITE CONTENT IN STAINLESS  
STEEL WELD METAL  


==A. INTRODUCTION==
==A. INTRODUCTION==
General Design Criterion  
lated the presence of the microfissures to the low General Design Criterion 1, "Quality Standards                                         delta ferrite content of the deposited weld metal.
1, "Quality Standards and Records," of Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 requires that components- important to safety be designed, fabricated, erected, and tested to quality standards commensurate with the importance of the
* safety function to be performed.


Criterion
and Records," of Appendix A, "General Design                                              Since microfissures in austenitic welds may have an Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part                                       adverse effect on the integrity of components, the
14, "Reac tor Coolant Pressure Boundary," of Appendix A re quires that the reactor coolant pressure boundary be designed, fabricated, erected, and tested so as to have an extremely low probability of abnormal leakage, of rapidly propagating failure, and of gross rupture. Ap"pendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Processing Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 requires that a quality assurance program be applied to the design, construction, and operation of structures, systems, and components.
  50 requires that components- important to safety be                                       control of weld deposits to ensure the presence of designed, fabricated, erected, and tested to quality                                      delta ferrite in these welds is advisable.


Appendix B also requires that measures be established to ensure that special processes, including welding, are con trolled and accomplished by qualified personnel using qualified procedures and that proper process monitoring be performed.
standards commensurate with the importance of the                                              As part of achieving this control, recommendations
 
* safety function to be performed. Criterion 14, "Reac                                      to test production welds were made in the original tor Coolant Pressure Boundary," of Appendix A re                                          version of this guide (Safety Guide 31, "Control of quires that the reactor coolant pressure boundary be                                      Stainless Steel Welding"), and these recommenda designed, fabricated, erected, and tested so as to have                                  tions were retained in Revision 1. Because licensees an extremely low probability of abnormal leakage, of                                      and other representatives of the nuclear industry be rapidly propagating failure, and of gross rupture. Ap                                    lieved that adequate control of filler metal ferrite con
This guide describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing these requirements with regard to the control of welding in fabricating and joining safety-related austenitic stainless steel com ponents and systems in light-water-cooled nuclear power plants. The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has been consulted concerning this guide and has concurred in the regulatory position.
  "pendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear                                        tent would consistently provide sound weld deposits Power Plants and Fuel Processing Plants," to 10 CFR                                      with an absence of microfissures, a cooperative study Part 50 requires that a quality assurance program be                                      group was formed by ASME, ANSI, and NRC to in applied to the design, construction, and operation of                                    vestigate the problem and the alternatives that would structures, systems, and components. Appendix B                                          ensure adequate control of ferrite content. The study also requires that measures be established to ensure                                       group analyzed data from welds prepared by eight that special processes, including welding, are con                                       different procedures. About 1500 test results were trolled and accomplished by qualified personnel                                           analyzed, and recommendations were made to both using qualified procedures and that proper process                                         ASME and NRC on how testing of production welds monitoring be performed.                                                                   could be reduced without sacrifice of ferrite content This guide describes a method acceptable to the                                       control. Revision 2 and this Revision 3 are based on NRC staff for implementing these requirements with                                         those recommendations. At present, the ASME
  regard to the control of welding in fabricating and                                       Code* provisions incorporated by reference into the joining safety-related austenitic stainless steel com                                     NRC regulations require compliance with one of two ponents and systems in light-water-cooled nuclear                                         alternative methods for control of delta ferrite in weld power plants. The Advisory Committee on Reactor                                           metal filler materials; either a chemical analysis Safeguards has been consulted concerning this guide                                       method or a magnetic measurement method. The and has concurred in the regulatory position.                                             NRC staff does not consider either method adequate


==B. DISCUSSION==
==B. DISCUSSION==
Inspection of some welds in austenitic stainless steel components of nuclear reactors has revealed the
Inspection of some welds in austenitic stainless                                  
* Lines indicate substantive changes from previous issue.presence of microfissures.
* Winter 1976 Addenda, Section III, "Nuclear Power Plant steel components of nuclear reactors has revealed the                                     Components," ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Copies may be obtained from the American Society of Mechanical En gineers, United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th Street, New York. New York 10017.


Further investigations re lated the presence of the microfissures to the low delta ferrite content of the deposited weld metal.  Since microfissures in austenitic welds may have an adverse effect on the integrity of components, the control of weld deposits to ensure the presence of delta ferrite in these welds is advisable.
* Lines indicate substantive changes from previous issue.


As part of achieving this control, recommendations to test production welds were made in the original version of this guide (Safety Guide 31, "Control of Stainless Steel Welding"), and these recommenda tions were retained in Revision 1. Because licensees and other representatives of the nuclear industry be lieved that adequate control of filler metal ferrite con tent would consistently provide sound weld deposits with an absence of microfissures, a cooperative study group was formed by ASME, ANSI, and NRC to in vestigate the problem and the alternatives that would ensure adequate control of ferrite content. The study group analyzed data from welds prepared by eight different procedures.
Comments should be sent to the Secretary      of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regu.


About 1500 test results were analyzed, and recommendations were made to both ASME and NRC on how testing of production welds could be reduced without sacrifice of ferrite content control. Revision 2 and this Revision 3 are based on those recommendations.
USNRC REGULATORY GUIDES                                            latory Commission. Washington. D.C.      20555. Attention Docketing and Service Regulatory Guides are issued to describe and make available to the public methods        Branch.


At present, the ASME Code* provisions incorporated by reference into the NRC regulations require compliance with one of two alternative methods for control of delta ferrite in weld metal filler materials;
acceptable to the NRC staff of implementing specific parts of the Commission's regulations. to delineate techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific problems  The guides are issued in the following ten broad divisions or postulated accidents, or to provide guidance to applicants. Regulatory Guides                                                     
either a chemical analysis method or a magnetic measurement method. The NRC staff does not consider either method adequate
* Winter 1976 Addenda, Section III, "Nuclear Power Plant Components," ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Copies may be obtained from the American Society of Mechanical En gineers, United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th Street, New York. New York 1001


===7. USNRC REGULATORY ===
===6. Products===
GUIDES Comments should be sent to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
                                                                                              1Power Reactors are not substitutes for regulations. and compliance with them is not require


Washington.
====d.     ====


D.C. 20555. Attention Docketing and Service Regulatory Guides are issued to describe and make available to the public methods Branchacceptable to the NRC staff of implementing specific parts of the Commission's regulations.
===7. Transportation===
                                                                                              2. Research and Test Reactors Methods and solutions different from those set out in the guides will be accept.        3.  Fuelsand Materials Facilities            8.  Occupational Health able if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance  4Environmental and Siting                9  Antitrust Review of a permit or license by the Commitsion.                                                5.  Materials and Plant Protection          10.  General Comments and suggestions for improvements in these guides are encouraged at all          Requests for single copies of issued guides (which may be reproducedI or for place ment on an automatic distribution list for single copies of future guides in specific times, and guides will be revised, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new information or experience. This guide was revised as a result of           divisions should be made in writing to the US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.


to delineate techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific problems The guides are issued in the following ten broad divisions or postulated accidents, or to provide guidance to applicants.
Washington. D.C. 20555, Attention        Director. Division of Document Control.


Regulatory Guides are not substitutes for regulations.
substantive comments received from the public and additional staff review.


and compliance with them is not required.
by itself to ensure controlled delta ferrite in produc                Chromium and Chromium-Nickel Steel Covered tion welds. The recommendations of this guide are                    Welding Electrodes,"* which describes a procedure intended to supplement the ASME Code requirements                    for pad preparation and ferrite measurement. The to ensure control of delta ferrite in welds in austenitic            NRC staff considers this procedure acceptable for use stainless steel core support structures and Class 1 and              with covered electrodes.


1. Power Reactors 6. Products Methods and solutions different from those set out in the guides will be accept. 2. Research and Test Reactors
2 components.                                                        3. Instrumentation The recommendations for testing of production                        The weld pad should be examined for ferrite con welds in Revision 1 of this guide have been replaced                  tent by a magnetic measuring instrument which has by recommendations for process control by testing of                  been calibrated against a Magnegage in accordance weld test pads. These changes will considerably re                    with American Welding Society Specification AWS
duce the testing effort needed to control delta ferrite              A4.2-74, "Procedures for Calibrating Magnetic In in welds.                                                             struments to Measure the Delta Ferrite Content of The staff recommends that ferrite content in the                 Austenitic Stainless Steel Weld Metal."'** The Mag weld filler metal as depicted by a ferrite number (FN)                negage should have been previously calibrated in ac be between 5 and 20. This lower limit provides suffi                  cordance with AWS A4.2-74 using primary standards cient ferrite to avoid microfissuring in welds,                      as defined therein.


===7. Transportation ===
whereas the upper limit provides a ferrite content                    4. Acceptability of Test Results adequate to offset dilution.                                              Weld pad test results showing an average Ferrite Number from 5 to 20 indicate that the filler metal is
3. Fuelsand Materials Facilities
8. Occupational Health able if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance
4. Environmental and Siting 9 Antitrust Review of a permit or license by the Commitsion.


5. Materials and Plant Protection
==C. REGULATORY POSITION==
10. General Comments and suggestions for improvements in these guides are encouraged at all Requests for single copies of issued guides (which may be reproducedI
acceptable for production welding of Class 1 and 2
or for place times, and guides will be revised, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and ment on an automatic distribution list for single copies of future guides in specific to reflect new information or experience.
1. Verification of Delta Ferrite Content of Filler                  austenitic stainless steel components and core support Materials                                                        structures.


This guide was revised as a result of divisions should be made in writing to the US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Prior to production usage, the delta ferrite content                  The upper limit of 20 may be waived for (a) welds of test weld deposits from each lot and each heat of                that do not receive postweld stress relief heat treat weld filler metal procured for the welding of austeni                ment or welds for which such postweld stress relief tic stainless steel core support structures and Class 1              treatment is conducted at temperatures less than and 2 components should be verified for each process                900'F, (b) welds that are given a solution annealing to be used in production.                                           heat treatment, and (c) welds that employ consuma ble inserts.


substantive comments received from the public and additional staff review. Washington.
It is not necessary to make delta ferrite determina
                                                                      5. Quality Assurance tions for SFA-5.4 type 16-8-2 weld metal or for filler The applicable provisions of 10 CFR Part 50, Ap metal used for weld metal cladding. Delta ferrite de terminations for consumable inserts, electrodes, rod                pendix B, should be used in verifying compliance or wire filler metal used with the gas tungsten arc                  with requirements for delta ferrite as described herein.


D.C. 20555, Attention Director.
welding process, and deposits made with the plasma arc welding process may be predicted from their chemical composition using an applicable constitu                                   


Division of Document Control.Revision 3 April 1978 by itself to ensure controlled delta ferrite in produc tion welds. The recommendations of this guide are intended to supplement the ASME Code requirements to ensure control of delta ferrite in welds in austenitic stainless steel core support structures and Class 1 and 2 components.
==D. IMPLEMENTATION==
tional diagram to demonstrate compliance. Delta fer rite verification should be made for all other proc                      The purpose of this section is to provide informa esses by tests using magnetic measuring devices on                    tion to applicants regarding the NRC staff's plans for undiluted weld deposits. For submerged arc welding                    using this regulatory guide.


The recommendations for testing of production welds in Revision 1 of this guide have been replaced by recommendations for process control by testing of weld test pads. These changes will considerably re duce the testing effort needed to control delta ferrite in welds.  The staff recommends that ferrite content in the weld filler metal as depicted by a ferrite number (FN) be between 5 and 20. This lower limit provides suffi cient ferrite to avoid microfissuring in welds, whereas the upper limit provides a ferrite content adequate to offset dilution.
processes, the verification tests for each wire and                      Except in those cases in which the applicant pro flux combination may be made on a production weld                    poses an acceptable alternative method for complying or simulated production weld. All other delta ferrite                 with specified portions of the Commission's regula weld filler verification tests should be made on weld                tions, the method described herein will be used in the pads that contain undiluted layers of weld metal.                     evaluation of submittals in connection with construc tion permit applications docketed after October 1,


C. REGULATORY
===2. Ferrite Measurement===
POSITION 1. Verification of Delta Ferrite Content of Filler Materials Prior to production usage, the delta ferrite content of test weld deposits from each lot and each heat of weld filler metal procured for the welding of austeni tic stainless steel core support structures and Class 1 and 2 components should be verified for each process to be used in production.
                                                                      1978.


It is not necessary to make delta ferrite determina tions for SFA-5.4 type 16-8-2 weld metal or for filler metal used for weld metal cladding.
Appendix A to this guide contains extracts from a If an applicant wishes to use this regulatory guide future edition of the American Welding Society's                      in developing submittals for applications docketed on AWS A5.4, "Specification for Corrosion-Resisting                      or before October 1, 1978, the pertinent portions of


Delta ferrite de terminations for consumable inserts, electrodes, rod or wire filler metal used with the gas tungsten arc welding process, and deposits made with the plasma arc welding process may be predicted from their chemical composition using an applicable constitu tional diagram to demonstrate compliance.
* This specification has been recommended by the Subcommit            the application will be evaluated on the basis of this tee on Welding of Stainless Steels of the High Alloys Committee      guide.


Delta fer rite verification should be made for all other proc esses by tests using magnetic measuring devices on undiluted weld deposits.
of the Welding Research Council and has been approved by the American Welding Society (AWS). It is expected to be pub              **Copies may be obtained from the American Welding Society, lished as AWS A5.4-78.                                                2501 N.W. 7th Street, Miami, Florida 33125.


For submerged arc welding processes, the verification tests for each wire and flux combination may be made on a production weld or simulated production weld. All other delta ferrite weld filler verification tests should be made on weld pads that contain undiluted layers of weld metal.  2. Ferrite Measurement Appendix A to this guide contains extracts from a future edition of the American Welding Society's AWS A5.4, "Specification for Corrosion-Resisting
1.31-2
* This specification has been recommended by the Subcommit tee on Welding of Stainless Steels of the High Alloys Committee of the Welding Research Council and has been approved by the American Welding Society (AWS). It is expected to be pub lished as AWS A5.4-78.Chromium and Chromium-Nickel Steel Covered Welding Electrodes,"*
which describes a procedure for pad preparation and ferrite measurement.


The NRC staff considers this procedure acceptable for use with covered electrodes.
APPENDIX A
    The following is mainly extracted from a future                        A4.10.3 The welding current used for the size of edition of the American Welding Society's (AWS)                        the electrode being tested may be as specified in Fig
"Specification for Corrosion-Resisting Chromium                        ure 4 and the arc length shall be as short as practica and Chromium-Nickel Steel Covered Welding Elec                          ble. The weld bead layers may be deposited with a trodes," which the AWS plans to publish as AWS                          weave, if 'necessary, to fill the space between the A5.4-78.* This material describes a procedure for                       copper bars. The arc shall not be allowed to impinge weld pad preparation and ferrite measurement of cov                    on the copper bars. The welding direction for each ered electrode** deposits.                                              pass shall be alternated and the weld stops and starts shall be located at the ends of the weld buildup. Each EXTRACT:                                                                pass shall be cleaned prior to depositing the next A4. 10 When it is desired to measure ferrite con                    weld bead. The maximum interpass temperature shall tent, the following procedure is recommended:                            be 95'C (200°F).** Between passes, the weld pad A4.10.1 Weld pads as detailed in Figure 4 are                        may be cooled by quenching in water not sooner than prepared as prescribed in paragraphs A4.10.2                            20 seconds after the completion of each pass. The through A4.10.4.                                                        last pass shall be air-cooled to below 430'C (800'F)
    A4.10.2 The weld pad shall be built up between                      prior to quenching in water.


3. Instrumentation The weld pad should be examined for ferrite con tent by a magnetic measuring instrument which has been calibrated against a Magnegage in accordance with American Welding Society Specification AWS A4.2-74, "Procedures for Calibrating Magnetic In struments to Measure the Delta Ferrite Content of Austenitic Stainless Steel Weld Metal."'**
two copper bars laid parallel on the base plate by de                      A4.10.4 The completed weld pad shall be draw positing single weld bead layers, one on top of the                      filed, machined, or surface ground to provide suffi other, to a minimum height of 13 mm (1/2in.). The                        cient finished surface to make the required ferrite spacing between the copper bars for the size of the                      readings. Draw filing or its equivalent filing method electrode being tested shall be as specified in Figure                  shall be performed with a 360 mm (14 in.)** mill
The Mag negage should have been previously calibrated in ac cordance with AWS A4.2-74 using primary standards as defined therein.
4. An optional welding fixture is shown in Figure 5.                    bastard file held on both sides of the weld with the If carbon steel is used as the base plate, the weld pad                  long axis of the file perpendicular to the long axis of shall be built up to a minimum height of 16 mm (5                        the weld. The file should preferably not have been in.).                                                                   previously used on ferritic material and should be


4. Acceptability of Test Results Weld pad test results showing an average Ferrite Number from 5 to 20 indicate that the filler metal is acceptable for production welding of Class 1 and 2 austenitic stainless steel components and core support structures.
* When published, copies of AWS A5.4-78 may be purchased                free from loosely adhering materials if previously from the American Welding Society, 2501 N.W. 7th Street,                used. Draw filing shall be accomplished by smooth Miami, Florida 33125.                                                   forward and backward strokes along the length of the
** Note: The U.S. customary units in this specification are            weld while applying a firm downward pressure.


The upper limit of 20 may be waived for (a) welds that do not receive postweld stress relief heat treat ment or welds for which such postweld stress relief treatment is conducted at temperatures less than 900'F, (b) welds that are given a solution annealing heat treatment, and (c) welds that employ consuma ble inserts.
given as equivalent values to the SI units. The standard sizes and dimensions used in the two systems are not identical and for Crossfiling shall not be permitted. The finished this reason conversion from a standard size of dimension in one        machined, ground, or filed surface shall be smooth system will not always coincide with the standard size of dimen          with all traces of weld ripple removed and shall be sion in the other. Suitable conversions encompassing standard          continuous in the length where measurements are to sizes of both can be made if appropriate tolerances are applied in      be taken. The width of the prepared surface shall not each case. The SI values (including tolerances) given here for filler metal diameter, length, and package size were selected to        be less than 3 mm (1/8in.).**
fit the product sizes which presently are U.S. standards. Toler            A4.10.5 A total of six ferrite readings shall be ances are used in some cases in this specification but not in            taken on the prepared surface along the longitudinal others. In those cases where no tolerances are given, the values        axis of the weld pad with an instrument calibrated in are those that would be obtained if the measurements were taken in SI units. In this specification, a covered electrode is defined      accordance with the procedures specified in AWS
as follows: Covered Electrode-A composite filler-metal elec              A4.2, "Standard Procedures for Calibrating Magnetic trode consisting of a core of a bare electrode or metal cored            Instruments to Measure the Delta Ferrite Content of electrode to which a covering sufficient to provide a slag layer        Austenitic Stainless Steel Weld Metal" (latest edition).
on the weld metal has been applied. The covering may contain                A4.10.6 The six readings 'obtained shall be aver materials providing such functions as shielding from the atmos phere, deoxidation, and arc stabilization and can serve as a              aged to a single value for conversion to Ferrite source of metallic additions to the weld.                                Number.


5. Quality Assurance The applicable provisions of 10 CFR Part 50, Ap pendix B, should be used in verifying compliance with requirements for delta ferrite as described herein.
1.31-3


==D. IMPLEMENTATION==
-  LL
The purpose of this section is to provide informa tion to applicants regarding the NRC staff's plans for using this regulatory guideExcept in those cases in which the applicant pro poses an acceptable alternative method for complying with specified portions of the Commission's regula tions, the method described herein will be used in the evaluation of submittals in connection with construc tion permit applications docketed after October 1, 1978If an applicant wishes to use this regulatory guide in developing submittals for applications docketed on or before October 1, 1978, the pertinent portions of the application will be evaluated on the basis of this guide. **Copies may be obtained from the American Welding Society, 2501 N.W. 7th Street, Miami, Florida 33125.1.31-2 APPENDIX A The following is mainly extracted from a future edition of the American Welding Society's (AWS) "Specification for Corrosion-Resisting Chromium and Chromium-Nickel Steel Covered Welding Elec trodes," which the AWS plans to publish as AWS A5.4-78.*
                                                        Ferrite shall be measured in this area free of arc
This material describes a procedure for weld pad preparation and ferrite measurement of cov ered electrode**
                -H                                        starts and craters              1 Copper bar                                I
deposits.
                                                                                        I
                                                                                        I
25x25x75                                                BASE PLATE
                                          1465              min                        .
          1 40  -25 min o                                                              I
            All dimensions in millimetres, U.S. EQUIVALENTS*
                                                                    mm            in.
 
1.6          1/16
                                                                      2.0          5/64
                                                                      2.4          3/32
                                                                      3.2          1/8
                                                                      4.0          5/32
                                                                      4.8          3/16 Electrode        Welding In drawing above                          6.4          1/4 diameter        current    (approx. mm)                            6        0.25 (mm)        (amperes)    W         L                            8        0.3
                                                                      9.5          3/8
    1.6            35-45      6        30                        10          0.4
    2.0            45-55      6        30                        13          0.5
  2.4              65-75      8        40                        15          0.6
    3.2             90-100    10        40                        18          0.7
  4.0            120-140    13        40                        25          1
  4.8            165-185    15        40                          30        1-1/4
                  240-260    18        40                        40          1-1/2
                                                                    65        2-1/2
                                                                    75        3 See Editor's Note on Page 1.31-3.
 
Fig 4 - Details of Weld Pad for Ferrite Test
                                      1.31-4


EXTRACT: A4. 10 When it is desired to measure ferrite con tent, the following procedure is recommended:
Copper bars 85 long of cross section as shown in A-A' below.
A4.10.1 Weld pads as detailed in Figure 4 are prepared as prescribed in paragraphs A4.10.2 through A4.10.4.


A4.10.2 The weld pad shall be built up between two copper bars laid parallel on the base plate by de positing single weld bead layers, one on top of the other, to a minimum height of 13 mm (1/2 in.). The spacing between the copper bars for the size of the electrode being tested shall be as specified in Figure 4. An optional welding fixture is shown in Figure 5.  If carbon steel is used as the base plate, the weld pad shall be built up to a minimum height of 16 mm (5 in.).
Copper bar 16 high x
* When published, copies of AWS A5.4-78 may be purchased from the American Welding Society, 2501 N.W. 7th Street, Miami, Florida 33125.  ** Note: The U.S. customary units in this specification are given as equivalent values to the SI units. The standard sizes and dimensions used in the two systems are not identical and for this reason conversion from a standard size of dimension in one system will not always coincide with the standard size of dimen sion in the other. Suitable conversions encompassing standard sizes of both can be made if appropriate tolerances are applied in each case. The SI values (including tolerances)
  9.5 thick x 70 lon
given here for filler metal diameter, length, and package size were selected to fit the product sizes which presently are U.S. standards.


Toler ances are used in some cases in this specification but not in others. In those cases where no tolerances are given, the values are those that would be obtained if the measurements were taken in SI units. In this specification, a covered electrode is defined as follows: Covered Electrode-A  
====g. Copper bar same====
composite filler-metal elec trode consisting of a core of a bare electrode or metal cored electrode to which a covering sufficient to provide a slag layer on the weld metal has been applied. The covering may contain materials providing such functions as shielding from the atmos phere, deoxidation, and arc stabilization and can serve as a source of metallic additions to the weld.A4.10.3 The welding current used for the size of the electrode being tested may be as specified in Fig ure 4 and the arc length shall be as short as practica ble. The weld bead layers may be deposited with a weave, if 'necessary, to fill the space between the copper bars. The arc shall not be allowed to impinge on the copper bars. The welding direction for each pass shall be alternated and the weld stops and starts shall be located at the ends of the weld buildup. Each pass shall be cleaned prior to depositing the next weld bead. The maximum interpass temperature shall be 95'C (200°F).**
                                                                              -as       shown at opposite end A
Between passes, the weld pad may be cooled by quenching in water not sooner than 20 seconds after the completion of each pass. The last pass shall be air-cooled to below 430'C (800'F) prior to quenching in water.  A4.10.4 The completed weld pad shall be draw filed, machined, or surface ground to provide suffi cient finished surface to make the required ferrite readings.
I
                                                                                        Type 1 For 4.0 dia. Electrodes and smaller Note:  All dimensions are in millimetres.


Draw filing or its equivalent filing method shall be performed with a 360 mm (14 in.)** mill bastard file held on both sides of the weld with the long axis of the file perpendicular to the long axis of the weld. The file should preferably not have been previously used on ferritic material and should be free from loosely adhering materials if previously used. Draw filing shall be accomplished by smooth forward and backward strokes along the length of the weld while applying a firm downward pressure.
COPPER
                                                                      16            BAR
              U.S. EQUIVALENTS*
              MM          in.


Crossfiling shall not be permitted.
T      Cross Section A-A'
              4.0        5/32 This design allows increased visibility,
              4.8        3/16                    making it easier to hold a short arc length.


The finished machined, ground, or filed surface shall be smooth with all traces of weld ripple removed and shall be continuous in the length where measurements are to be taken. The width of the prepared surface shall not be less than 3 mm (1/8 in.).** A4.10.5 A total of six ferrite readings shall be taken on the prepared surface along the longitudinal axis of the weld pad with an instrument calibrated in accordance with the procedures specified in AWS A4.2, "Standard Procedures for Calibrating Magnetic Instruments to Measure the Delta Ferrite Content of Austenitic Stainless Steel Weld Metal" (latest edition). 
9.5        3/8
A4.10.6 The six readings 'obtained shall be aver aged to a single value for conversion to Ferrite Number.1.31-3
            16          5/8
-H Copper bar-L L Ferrite shall be measured in this area free of arc starts and cratersI I I BASE PLATE 1 465 min All dimensions in millimetres, U.S. EQUIVALENTS*
            25          1                               COPPEIR                  COPPER
Electrode diameter (mm)1.6 2.0 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.8 Welding current (amperes)35-45 45-55 65-75 90-100 120-140 165-185 240-260 In drawing above (approx. mm)W 6 6 8 10 13 15 18 L 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 See Editor's Note on Page 1.31-3.  Fig 4 -Details of Weld Pad for Ferrite Test 1.31-4 25x25x75 1 40 -25 min o mm 1.6 2.0 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.8 6.4 6 8 9.5 10 13 15 18 25 30 40 65 75 in.  1/16 5/64 3/32 1/8 5/32 3/16 1/4 0.25 0.3 3/8 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 1 1-1/4 1-1/2 2-1/2 3.I
                                                          BAR                      BAR
Copper bars 85 long of cross section as shown in A-A' below.Copper bar 16 high x 9.5 thick x 70 long.Note: All dimensions are in millimetres.
            70          2-3/4                         25 square
            85          3-3/8 Type 2
    *See Editor's Note on Page 1.31-3.


U.S. EQUIVALENTS*
For 4.8 & larger welding electrodes and for any pads on carbon steel base plate Fig. 5 - Optional Welding Fixture for Welding Ferrite Test Pads
MM in.4.0 4.8 9.5 16 25 70 85 Copper bar same -as shown at opposite end A Type 1 For 4.0 dia. Electrodes and smaller COPPER 16 BAR T Cross Section A-A'This design allows increased visibility, making it easier to hold a short arc length.5/32 3/16 3/8 5/8 1 2-3/4 3-3/8*See Editor's Note on Page 1.31-3.COPPEIR BAR 25 square COPPER BAR Type 2 For 4.8 & larger welding electrodes and for any pads on carbon steel base plate Fig. 5 -Optional Welding Fixture for Welding Ferrite Test Pads 1.31-5 I}}
                                                1.31-5}}


{{RG-Nav}}
{{RG-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 10:25, 28 March 2020

Control of Ferrite Content in Statinless Steel Weld Metal
ML003739986
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/30/1978
From:
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
References
RG-1.031, Rev 3
Download: ML003739986 (5)


Revision 3 April 1978 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGULATORY GUIDE

OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT

REGULATORY GUIDE 1.31 CONTROL OF FERRITE CONTENT IN

STAINLESS STEEL WELD METAL

presence of microfissures. Further investigations re

A. INTRODUCTION

lated the presence of the microfissures to the low General Design Criterion 1, "Quality Standards delta ferrite content of the deposited weld metal.

and Records," of Appendix A, "General Design Since microfissures in austenitic welds may have an Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part adverse effect on the integrity of components, the

50 requires that components- important to safety be control of weld deposits to ensure the presence of designed, fabricated, erected, and tested to quality delta ferrite in these welds is advisable.

standards commensurate with the importance of the As part of achieving this control, recommendations

  • safety function to be performed. Criterion 14, "Reac to test production welds were made in the original tor Coolant Pressure Boundary," of Appendix A re version of this guide (Safety Guide 31, "Control of quires that the reactor coolant pressure boundary be Stainless Steel Welding"), and these recommenda designed, fabricated, erected, and tested so as to have tions were retained in Revision 1. Because licensees an extremely low probability of abnormal leakage, of and other representatives of the nuclear industry be rapidly propagating failure, and of gross rupture. Ap lieved that adequate control of filler metal ferrite con

"pendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear tent would consistently provide sound weld deposits Power Plants and Fuel Processing Plants," to 10 CFR with an absence of microfissures, a cooperative study Part 50 requires that a quality assurance program be group was formed by ASME, ANSI, and NRC to in applied to the design, construction, and operation of vestigate the problem and the alternatives that would structures, systems, and components. Appendix B ensure adequate control of ferrite content. The study also requires that measures be established to ensure group analyzed data from welds prepared by eight that special processes, including welding, are con different procedures. About 1500 test results were trolled and accomplished by qualified personnel analyzed, and recommendations were made to both using qualified procedures and that proper process ASME and NRC on how testing of production welds monitoring be performed. could be reduced without sacrifice of ferrite content This guide describes a method acceptable to the control. Revision 2 and this Revision 3 are based on NRC staff for implementing these requirements with those recommendations. At present, the ASME

regard to the control of welding in fabricating and Code* provisions incorporated by reference into the joining safety-related austenitic stainless steel com NRC regulations require compliance with one of two ponents and systems in light-water-cooled nuclear alternative methods for control of delta ferrite in weld power plants. The Advisory Committee on Reactor metal filler materials; either a chemical analysis Safeguards has been consulted concerning this guide method or a magnetic measurement method. The and has concurred in the regulatory position. NRC staff does not consider either method adequate

B. DISCUSSION

Inspection of some welds in austenitic stainless

  • Winter 1976 Addenda,Section III, "Nuclear Power Plant steel components of nuclear reactors has revealed the Components," ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Copies may be obtained from the American Society of Mechanical En gineers, United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th Street, New York. New York 10017.
  • Lines indicate substantive changes from previous issue.

Comments should be sent to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regu.

USNRC REGULATORY GUIDES latory Commission. Washington. D.C. 20555. Attention Docketing and Service Regulatory Guides are issued to describe and make available to the public methods Branch.

acceptable to the NRC staff of implementing specific parts of the Commission's regulations. to delineate techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific problems The guides are issued in the following ten broad divisions or postulated accidents, or to provide guidance to applicants. Regulatory Guides

6. Products

1. Power Reactors are not substitutes for regulations. and compliance with them is not require

d.

7. Transportation

2. Research and Test Reactors Methods and solutions different from those set out in the guides will be accept. 3. Fuelsand Materials Facilities 8. Occupational Health able if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance 4. Environmental and Siting 9 Antitrust Review of a permit or license by the Commitsion. 5. Materials and Plant Protection 10. General Comments and suggestions for improvements in these guides are encouraged at all Requests for single copies of issued guides (which may be reproducedI or for place ment on an automatic distribution list for single copies of future guides in specific times, and guides will be revised, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new information or experience. This guide was revised as a result of divisions should be made in writing to the US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Washington. D.C. 20555, Attention Director. Division of Document Control.

substantive comments received from the public and additional staff review.

by itself to ensure controlled delta ferrite in produc Chromium and Chromium-Nickel Steel Covered tion welds. The recommendations of this guide are Welding Electrodes,"* which describes a procedure intended to supplement the ASME Code requirements for pad preparation and ferrite measurement. The to ensure control of delta ferrite in welds in austenitic NRC staff considers this procedure acceptable for use stainless steel core support structures and Class 1 and with covered electrodes.

2 components. 3. Instrumentation The recommendations for testing of production The weld pad should be examined for ferrite con welds in Revision 1 of this guide have been replaced tent by a magnetic measuring instrument which has by recommendations for process control by testing of been calibrated against a Magnegage in accordance weld test pads. These changes will considerably re with American Welding Society Specification AWS

duce the testing effort needed to control delta ferrite A4.2-74, "Procedures for Calibrating Magnetic In in welds. struments to Measure the Delta Ferrite Content of The staff recommends that ferrite content in the Austenitic Stainless Steel Weld Metal."'** The Mag weld filler metal as depicted by a ferrite number (FN) negage should have been previously calibrated in ac be between 5 and 20. This lower limit provides suffi cordance with AWS A4.2-74 using primary standards cient ferrite to avoid microfissuring in welds, as defined therein.

whereas the upper limit provides a ferrite content 4. Acceptability of Test Results adequate to offset dilution. Weld pad test results showing an average Ferrite Number from 5 to 20 indicate that the filler metal is

C. REGULATORY POSITION

acceptable for production welding of Class 1 and 2

1. Verification of Delta Ferrite Content of Filler austenitic stainless steel components and core support Materials structures.

Prior to production usage, the delta ferrite content The upper limit of 20 may be waived for (a) welds of test weld deposits from each lot and each heat of that do not receive postweld stress relief heat treat weld filler metal procured for the welding of austeni ment or welds for which such postweld stress relief tic stainless steel core support structures and Class 1 treatment is conducted at temperatures less than and 2 components should be verified for each process 900'F, (b) welds that are given a solution annealing to be used in production. heat treatment, and (c) welds that employ consuma ble inserts.

It is not necessary to make delta ferrite determina

5. Quality Assurance tions for SFA-5.4 type 16-8-2 weld metal or for filler The applicable provisions of 10 CFR Part 50, Ap metal used for weld metal cladding. Delta ferrite de terminations for consumable inserts, electrodes, rod pendix B, should be used in verifying compliance or wire filler metal used with the gas tungsten arc with requirements for delta ferrite as described herein.

welding process, and deposits made with the plasma arc welding process may be predicted from their chemical composition using an applicable constitu

D. IMPLEMENTATION

tional diagram to demonstrate compliance. Delta fer rite verification should be made for all other proc The purpose of this section is to provide informa esses by tests using magnetic measuring devices on tion to applicants regarding the NRC staff's plans for undiluted weld deposits. For submerged arc welding using this regulatory guide.

processes, the verification tests for each wire and Except in those cases in which the applicant pro flux combination may be made on a production weld poses an acceptable alternative method for complying or simulated production weld. All other delta ferrite with specified portions of the Commission's regula weld filler verification tests should be made on weld tions, the method described herein will be used in the pads that contain undiluted layers of weld metal. evaluation of submittals in connection with construc tion permit applications docketed after October 1,

2. Ferrite Measurement

1978.

Appendix A to this guide contains extracts from a If an applicant wishes to use this regulatory guide future edition of the American Welding Society's in developing submittals for applications docketed on AWS A5.4, "Specification for Corrosion-Resisting or before October 1, 1978, the pertinent portions of

  • This specification has been recommended by the Subcommit the application will be evaluated on the basis of this tee on Welding of Stainless Steels of the High Alloys Committee guide.

of the Welding Research Council and has been approved by the American Welding Society (AWS). It is expected to be pub **Copies may be obtained from the American Welding Society, lished as AWS A5.4-78. 2501 N.W. 7th Street, Miami, Florida 33125.

1.31-2

APPENDIX A

The following is mainly extracted from a future A4.10.3 The welding current used for the size of edition of the American Welding Society's (AWS) the electrode being tested may be as specified in Fig

"Specification for Corrosion-Resisting Chromium ure 4 and the arc length shall be as short as practica and Chromium-Nickel Steel Covered Welding Elec ble. The weld bead layers may be deposited with a trodes," which the AWS plans to publish as AWS weave, if 'necessary, to fill the space between the A5.4-78.* This material describes a procedure for copper bars. The arc shall not be allowed to impinge weld pad preparation and ferrite measurement of cov on the copper bars. The welding direction for each ered electrode** deposits. pass shall be alternated and the weld stops and starts shall be located at the ends of the weld buildup. Each EXTRACT: pass shall be cleaned prior to depositing the next A4. 10 When it is desired to measure ferrite con weld bead. The maximum interpass temperature shall tent, the following procedure is recommended: be 95'C (200°F).** Between passes, the weld pad A4.10.1 Weld pads as detailed in Figure 4 are may be cooled by quenching in water not sooner than prepared as prescribed in paragraphs A4.10.2 20 seconds after the completion of each pass. The through A4.10.4. last pass shall be air-cooled to below 430'C (800'F)

A4.10.2 The weld pad shall be built up between prior to quenching in water.

two copper bars laid parallel on the base plate by de A4.10.4 The completed weld pad shall be draw positing single weld bead layers, one on top of the filed, machined, or surface ground to provide suffi other, to a minimum height of 13 mm (1/2in.). The cient finished surface to make the required ferrite spacing between the copper bars for the size of the readings. Draw filing or its equivalent filing method electrode being tested shall be as specified in Figure shall be performed with a 360 mm (14 in.)** mill

4. An optional welding fixture is shown in Figure 5. bastard file held on both sides of the weld with the If carbon steel is used as the base plate, the weld pad long axis of the file perpendicular to the long axis of shall be built up to a minimum height of 16 mm (5 the weld. The file should preferably not have been in.). previously used on ferritic material and should be

  • When published, copies of AWS A5.4-78 may be purchased free from loosely adhering materials if previously from the American Welding Society, 2501 N.W. 7th Street, used. Draw filing shall be accomplished by smooth Miami, Florida 33125. forward and backward strokes along the length of the
    • Note: The U.S. customary units in this specification are weld while applying a firm downward pressure.

given as equivalent values to the SI units. The standard sizes and dimensions used in the two systems are not identical and for Crossfiling shall not be permitted. The finished this reason conversion from a standard size of dimension in one machined, ground, or filed surface shall be smooth system will not always coincide with the standard size of dimen with all traces of weld ripple removed and shall be sion in the other. Suitable conversions encompassing standard continuous in the length where measurements are to sizes of both can be made if appropriate tolerances are applied in be taken. The width of the prepared surface shall not each case. The SI values (including tolerances) given here for filler metal diameter, length, and package size were selected to be less than 3 mm (1/8in.).**

fit the product sizes which presently are U.S. standards. Toler A4.10.5 A total of six ferrite readings shall be ances are used in some cases in this specification but not in taken on the prepared surface along the longitudinal others. In those cases where no tolerances are given, the values axis of the weld pad with an instrument calibrated in are those that would be obtained if the measurements were taken in SI units. In this specification, a covered electrode is defined accordance with the procedures specified in AWS

as follows: Covered Electrode-A composite filler-metal elec A4.2, "Standard Procedures for Calibrating Magnetic trode consisting of a core of a bare electrode or metal cored Instruments to Measure the Delta Ferrite Content of electrode to which a covering sufficient to provide a slag layer Austenitic Stainless Steel Weld Metal" (latest edition).

on the weld metal has been applied. The covering may contain A4.10.6 The six readings 'obtained shall be aver materials providing such functions as shielding from the atmos phere, deoxidation, and arc stabilization and can serve as a aged to a single value for conversion to Ferrite source of metallic additions to the weld. Number.

1.31-3

- LL

Ferrite shall be measured in this area free of arc

-H starts and craters 1 Copper bar I

I

I

25x25x75 BASE PLATE

1465 min .

1 40 -25 min o I

All dimensions in millimetres, U.S. EQUIVALENTS*

mm in.

1.6 1/16

2.0 5/64

2.4 3/32

3.2 1/8

4.0 5/32

4.8 3/16 Electrode Welding In drawing above 6.4 1/4 diameter current (approx. mm) 6 0.25 (mm) (amperes) W L 8 0.3

9.5 3/8

1.6 35-45 6 30 10 0.4

2.0 45-55 6 30 13 0.5

2.4 65-75 8 40 15 0.6

3.2 90-100 10 40 18 0.7

4.0 120-140 13 40 25 1

4.8 165-185 15 40 30 1-1/4

240-260 18 40 40 1-1/2

65 2-1/2

75 3 See Editor's Note on Page 1.31-3.

Fig 4 - Details of Weld Pad for Ferrite Test

1.31-4

Copper bars 85 long of cross section as shown in A-A' below.

Copper bar 16 high x

9.5 thick x 70 lon

g. Copper bar same

-as shown at opposite end A

I

Type 1 For 4.0 dia. Electrodes and smaller Note: All dimensions are in millimetres.

COPPER

16 BAR

U.S. EQUIVALENTS*

MM in.

T Cross Section A-A'

4.0 5/32 This design allows increased visibility,

4.8 3/16 making it easier to hold a short arc length.

9.5 3/8

16 5/8

25 1 COPPEIR COPPER

BAR BAR

70 2-3/4 25 square

85 3-3/8 Type 2

  • See Editor's Note on Page 1.31-3.

For 4.8 & larger welding electrodes and for any pads on carbon steel base plate Fig. 5 - Optional Welding Fixture for Welding Ferrite Test Pads

1.31-5