ML19294A827: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
The acceptance review was performed in accordance with NRR Office Instruction LIC-109 to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The acceptance review was performed in accordance with NRR Office Instruction LIC-109 to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
NRC has reviewed the application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed changes in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, we will let you know by separate correspondence. | NRC has reviewed the application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed changes in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, we will let you know by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 160 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is September 5, 2020. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::160 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is September 5, 2020. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of the scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of the scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact the Waterford 3 Project Manager, April Pulvirenti, at (301)-415-1390. | If you have any questions, please contact the Waterford 3 Project Manager, April Pulvirenti, at (301)-415-1390. | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 3 March 2020
| ML19294A827 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 10/21/2019 |
| From: | April Pulvirenti NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL4 |
| To: | Zamber M Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| References | |
| Download: ML19294A827 (3) | |
Text
NRR-DRMAPEm Resource From: Pulvirenti, April Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 12:46 PM To: Zamber, Maria Cc: Dixon-Herrity, Jennifer
Subject:
WATERFORD UNIT 3 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO RELOCATE BORATION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TO THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL
- Maria, By letter dated September 20, 2019, (ADAMS Accession No ML19263F129), Entergy Operations, Inc., submitted a request for an amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-38 for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Units 3 (Waterford 3). The proposed change would revise the Waterford 3 Technical Specifications to relocate TS 3.1.2.1 through 3.1.2.8, Boration Systems, from the Technical Specifications to the Waterford 3 Technical Requirements Manual.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the acceptance review of this amendment request.
The acceptance review was performed in accordance with NRR Office Instruction LIC-109 to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
NRC has reviewed the application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed changes in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, we will let you know by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 160 hours6.667 days <br />0.952 weeks <br />0.219 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is September 5, 2020. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of the scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact the Waterford 3 Project Manager, April Pulvirenti, at (301)-415-1390.
Dr. April Pulvirenti Project Manager, Waterford NRR/DORL/LPL4 1
OWFN 09F04B 301-415-1390 2
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 277 Mail Envelope Properties (MN2PR09MB3983CE8290D28F5D733D42EA8F690)
Subject:
WATERFORD UNIT 3 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO RELOCATE BORATION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TO THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL Sent Date: 10/21/2019 12:45:40 PM Received Date: 10/21/2019 12:45:00 PM From: Pulvirenti, April Created By: April.Pulvirenti@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Dixon-Herrity, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Dixon-Herrity@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Zamber, Maria" <mzamber@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: MN2PR09MB3983.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3004 10/21/2019 12:45:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: