ML19260A191: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. _ . _ _ . _ _ - | {{#Wiki_filter:. _ . _ _ . _ _ - | ||
NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY SURVEY FOR THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 1978 THROUGH AUGUST 1979 Prepared By: | |||
NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY SURVEY FOR THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 1978 THROUGH AUGUST 1979 | |||
Prepared By: | |||
Jeanne Adams George Cozens Joe Woods | Jeanne Adams George Cozens Joe Woods | ||
.m 1299 303 2 | .m 1299 303 2 | ||
NORTHROP RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER One Research Park Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA. 90274 Telephone (213) 377-4811 Q hi%- | NORTHROP RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER One Research Park Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA. 90274 Telephone (213) 377-4811 Q hi%- | ||
g.g 0q0 | g.g 0q0 | ||
NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CENTER INTRODUCTION The health physics environmental sampling program includes a continuous evaluation of the levels of naturally occurring radioactivity in the immediate environs, and out to a radius of five miles from the Northrop Reactor site. | NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CENTER INTRODUCTION The health physics environmental sampling program includes a continuous evaluation of the levels of naturally occurring radioactivity in the immediate environs, and out to a radius of five miles from the Northrop Reactor site. | ||
Fluctuations in the radioactivity content of the environmental samples occur from time to time due to seasonal and climatic conditions which may affect the deposition of the atmospheric fallout or other airborne radioactive materials. | Fluctuations in the radioactivity content of the environmental samples occur from time to time due to seasonal and climatic conditions which may affect the deposition of the atmospheric fallout or other airborne radioactive materials. | ||
Line 47: | Line 30: | ||
In order to maintain continuity in the overall sampling program, the sampling sites have not been changed from those shown in Table I. All sample processing and handling techniques have remained the same as those stated in the preview repo rts. | In order to maintain continuity in the overall sampling program, the sampling sites have not been changed from those shown in Table I. All sample processing and handling techniques have remained the same as those stated in the preview repo rts. | ||
AIR ANALYSES A total of 92 continuous air samples were collected during the period from 5 sites S-11 and S-12 The sampling time was approximately 168 hours per sample. A 72-hour decay period was permitted on each sample prior to count-ing to eliminate natural Radon-Thoron activities. | AIR ANALYSES A total of 92 continuous air samples were collected during the period from 5 sites S-11 and S-12 The sampling time was approximately 168 hours per sample. A 72-hour decay period was permitted on each sample prior to count-ing to eliminate natural Radon-Thoron activities. | ||
1299 304 1 | |||
1299 304 | |||
1 | |||
-i.mi .i - - | -i.mi .i - - | ||
NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CENTER Figure 1 graphically displays the monthly averages from the two sampling s tations . | NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CENTER Figure 1 graphically displays the monthly averages from the two sampling s tations . | ||
RAINWATER ANALYSES A total of 2 7 samples were collected from sites S-Il and S-12 The radio-acti"ity content of the rainwater, as shown in Figure 2, does not indicate any significant changes from the previous periods. | RAINWATER ANALYSES A total of 2 7 samples were collected from sites S-Il and S-12 The radio-acti"ity content of the rainwater, as shown in Figure 2, does not indicate any significant changes from the previous periods. | ||
SOIL ^NALYSES A total of 108 soil samples were collected from the sampling sites indicated in Table I. The radioactivity content of the soil samples, as shown in Figure 3, indicates a relatively stable trend. | |||
SOIL ^NALYSES A total of 108 soil samples were collected from the sampling sites indicated | VEGETATION ANALYSES A total of 108 vegetation samples were collected and processed from the same areas as the soil samples. The samples indicated no increase in radioactivity content. The overall trend was quite typical. The monthly averages are shown in Figure 4. | ||
WATER ANALYSES A total of 120 water samples were collected from the sites indicated in Table I. The combined monthly averages for drinking water and pond water are shown in Figure 5. The water samples indicate only a very slight variation in radio-activity. | |||
in Table I. The radioactivity content of the soil samples, as shown in Figure 3, | DISCUSSION Analysis of the data for the overall environmental samples indicates a reasonably stable trend in their radioactivity conten'., with no significant changes from previous sampling periods. | ||
indicates a relatively stable trend. | |||
VEGETATION ANALYSES A total of 108 vegetation samples were collected and processed from the same | |||
areas as the soil samples. The samples indicated no increase in radioactivity content. The overall trend was quite typical. The monthly averages are shown in Figure 4. | |||
WATER ANALYSES A total of 120 water samples were collected from the sites indicated in Table I. The combined monthly averages for drinking water and pond water are shown | |||
in Figure 5. The water samples indicate only a very slight variation in radio- | |||
activity. | |||
DISCUSSION | |||
Analysis of the data for the overall environmental samples indicates a reasonably stable trend in their radioactivity conten'., with no significant changes from previous sampling periods. | |||
1299 305 U | 1299 305 U | ||
NORTHROP RESEARCH h TECHNOLOGY CENTER At times the radioactivity content of the environmental samples changed due | NORTHROP RESEARCH h TECHNOLOGY CENTER At times the radioactivity content of the environmental samples changed due | ||
~ | ~ | ||
to climatic conditions, the prevailing winds (with the change in seasons), and the tempe rature inversions in the Los Angeles basin. The smog content in the air | to climatic conditions, the prevailing winds (with the change in seasons), and the tempe rature inversions in the Los Angeles basin. The smog content in the air during periods of temperature inversions tends to increase the natural background radioactivity of the air. | ||
during periods of temperature inversions tends to increase the natural background radioactivity of the air. | |||
Since the overall radioactivity content of the environmental samples was reasonably stable, it is apparent that the Northrop Reactor and associated facilities have not contributed significantly to the natural radioactivity background. ' | Since the overall radioactivity content of the environmental samples was reasonably stable, it is apparent that the Northrop Reactor and associated facilities have not contributed significantly to the natural radioactivity background. ' | ||
1299 306 z | 1299 306 z | ||
3 | 3 | ||
M__ | M__ | ||
NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CENTER | NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CENTER TABLE I S AMPLING SITES SITE LOCATION S AMPLES TAKEN 2 | ||
TABLE I S AMPLING SITES SITE LOCATION S AMPLES TAKEN 2 | |||
S-1 Reactor Soil, vegetation, and drinking water S-2 Imperial Highway and Soil, vegets. tion, and drinking water Inglewood Blvd. | S-1 Reactor Soil, vegetation, and drinking water S-2 Imperial Highway and Soil, vegets. tion, and drinking water Inglewood Blvd. | ||
S-3 Imperial Highway and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Sepulveda Blvd. | S-3 Imperial Highway and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Sepulveda Blvd. | ||
S-4 Prairie Avenue and Soil, vegetation, and pond water Redondo Beach Blvd. (Alondra Park) | S-4 Prairie Avenue and Soil, vegetation, and pond water Redondo Beach Blvd. (Alondra Park) | ||
S-5 Hawthorne Blvd. and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Redondo Beach Blvd. | S-5 Hawthorne Blvd. and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Redondo Beach Blvd. | ||
S-6 Hawthorne Blvd. and Soil, vegetation, and inking water 190th St. | S-6 Hawthorne Blvd. and Soil, vegetation, and inking water 190th St. | ||
S-7 Normandie and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water El Segundo Blvd. | S-7 Normandie and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water El Segundo Blvd. | ||
S-8 Rosecrans and Central Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Avenue S-9 Hawthorne Blvd. and Drinking water Century Avenue S-10 La Brea Avenue and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Slauson Avenue S-11 Atop Engineering Center Air (particulates), and rainwater | |||
S-8 Rosecrans and Central Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Avenue | _ 900 yards west of reactor S-12 Atop Plant III, 200 yards Air (particulates), and rainwater east of reactor 1299 307 4 | ||
S-9 Hawthorne Blvd. and Drinking water Century Avenue S-10 La Brea Avenue and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Slauson Avenue S-11 Atop Engineering Center Air (particulates), and rainwater | |||
_ 900 yards west of reactor S-12 Atop Plant III, 200 yards Air (particulates), and rainwater | |||
east of reactor | |||
1299 307 | |||
4 | |||
P | P | ||
: 3. 0 1 | |||
: 3. 0 | |||
1 | |||
: 2. 5 - | : 2. 5 - | ||
: 2. 0 - | : 2. 0 - | ||
c. | c. | ||
.N_ _ | .N_ _ | ||
O | O | ||
* 1. 5 - | * 1. 5 - | ||
m | m i | ||
i | |||
o | o | ||
~ ~ | ~ ~ | ||
: 1. 0 t . | : 1. 0 t . | ||
.T . | .T . | ||
o | o l | ||
l | |||
.o.. | .o.. | ||
l | l a | ||
a | |||
l3 . 3 == | l3 . 3 == | ||
.S - | .S - | ||
t - | t - | ||
Line 175: | Line 82: | ||
a 4 - | a 4 - | ||
w O O W < a < 1 < 3 % a a O Z c n N 2 < y , q < | w O O W < a < 1 < 3 % a a O Z c n N 2 < y , q < | ||
I 1978 1979 FIG. 1 Monthly Averages of Continuous Air Samples Frotn Sites S-11 & S-12. | |||
I 1978 1979 FIG. 1 Monthly Averages of Continuous Air Samples | |||
Frotn Sites S-11 & S-12. | |||
1,99 2 508 | 1,99 2 508 | ||
m u | m u | ||
Line 197: | Line 99: | ||
s t m | s t m | ||
u | u | ||
: s. l u ) | : s. l u ) | ||
m l I m | m l I m | ||
Line 206: | Line 107: | ||
m u ~ wl . | m u ~ wl . | ||
m 0 3 1 | m 0 3 1 | ||
( . | ( . | ||
m t . | |||
m | |||
t . | |||
i _ | i _ | ||
y m | |||
u t I u i m v i | |||
y | |||
u i m v i | |||
t wI _ | t wI _ | ||
c n | c n A a n n a n i i i i | ||
A a n n a n | |||
i i i i | |||
a a a i m | a a a i m | ||
f r a a a _ | f r a a a _ | ||
e s R R R R R R | e s R R R R R R t | ||
a o o o o o o N N N s W # | |||
s W # | |||
2 M N N m | 2 M N N m | ||
u m i n t a | u m i n t a | ||
R ~ | R ~ | ||
- e a | - e a | ||
r u T u e P T V C N l | r u T u e P T V C N l | ||
l R R Y G s | l R R Y G s | ||
Line 257: | Line 133: | ||
e NsO, N i vEg:rY ><$ ,T" R 9Rp . i | e NsO, N i vEg:rY ><$ ,T" R 9Rp . i | ||
"< a ,, mv3T* | "< a ,, mv3T* | ||
m m*y 5EmM 0 C R- m' F i | m m*y 5EmM 0 C R- m' F i | ||
m m | m m | ||
u | u | ||
: l. 5 O 1. 0 - | |||
: l. 5 | |||
O 1. 0 - | |||
.c - | .c - | ||
..a o | ..a o | ||
, x s | , x s | ||
O - | O - | ||
Line 281: | Line 147: | ||
e . | e . | ||
C O | C O | ||
: 0. 5 | : 0. 5 0 . | ||
u 0 | |||
o . | |||
0 . | |||
u | |||
m F | m F | ||
1 b > 0 g ::: % e > g , - | 1 b > 0 g ::: % e > g , - | ||
W O O ta < W < 1 < g X m O Z c , a 2 < 2 , g q 1978 1979 FIG. 3 Monthly Averages of Soil Samples ?99 310 From Stre s S-1 Thru S-8 & S-10, | |||
W O O ta < W < 1 < g X m O Z c , a 2 < 2 , g q 1978 1979 FIG. 3 Monthly Averages of Soil Samples ?99 310 | |||
From Stre s S-1 Thru S-8 & S-10, | |||
: l. 5 - | : l. 5 - | ||
efMb i | efMb i | ||
< 1. 0 | < 1. 0 L. | ||
L. | |||
Q i | Q i | ||
E 2 | E 2 | ||
U - | U - | ||
<r e | <r e | ||
o | o | ||
.s 0. 5 - | .s 0. 5 - | ||
.2 u . | |||
.2 | |||
u . | |||
c | c | ||
.b | .b | ||
._ ce T | ._ ce T | ||
-2 9 | -2 9 | ||
i S > 0 z c d e > ~ , | i S > 0 z c d e > ~ , | ||
g | g | ||
- W O O bi < W < a < ' ~ | - W O O bi < W < a < ' ~ | ||
m O Z Q , 4 2 < 2 $ $ Q l | |||
m O Z Q , 4 2 < 2 $ $ Q | 1978 l 1979 FIG. 4 Monthly Ave rages of Vegetation Samples From Sites S-1 Thrv. S-8 & S-10. | ||
l | |||
1978 l 1979 FIG. 4 | |||
Monthly Ave rages of Vegetation Samples From Sites S-1 Thrv. S-8 & S-10. | |||
1299 311 | 1299 311 | ||
M e m ul s- | M e m ul s-I I | ||
I I | |||
1 I _ | 1 I _ | ||
t. | t. | ||
I I | I I | ||
Line 380: | Line 196: | ||
T P T V C N l R R Y G e | T P T V C N l R R Y G e | ||
C O E l | C O E l | ||
E A A N l | E A A N l E A P U U U e | ||
E A P U U U e | |||
S O N D J F M A M J J A g.m | S O N D J F M A M J J A g.m | ||
~ ._mND | ~ ._mND | ||
~ | ~ | ||
n rN | n rN |
Latest revision as of 07:44, 22 February 2020
ML19260A191 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | 05000187 |
Issue date: | 08/31/1979 |
From: | Adams J, Cozens G, Woods J NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNICAL CENTER |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML19260A190 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 7911070209 | |
Download: ML19260A191 (12) | |
Text
. _ . _ _ . _ _ -
NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY SURVEY FOR THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 1978 THROUGH AUGUST 1979 Prepared By:
Jeanne Adams George Cozens Joe Woods
.m 1299 303 2
NORTHROP RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER One Research Park Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA. 90274 Telephone (213) 377-4811 Q hi%-
g.g 0q0
NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CENTER INTRODUCTION The health physics environmental sampling program includes a continuous evaluation of the levels of naturally occurring radioactivity in the immediate environs, and out to a radius of five miles from the Northrop Reactor site.
Fluctuations in the radioactivity content of the environmental samples occur from time to time due to seasonal and climatic conditions which may affect the deposition of the atmospheric fallout or other airborne radioactive materials.
These minor variations must be noted since they do add to the natural environ-mental background; therefore, it is quite important to compile the sample data and periodically compare it with the data from the previous sampling periods in order to establish the trend in the natural background.
This report is a compilation of the data derived from the environmental samples collected and processed during the period of September 1978 through August 1979 which comprises the eighteenth annual report.
In order to maintain continuity in the overall sampling program, the sampling sites have not been changed from those shown in Table I. All sample processing and handling techniques have remained the same as those stated in the preview repo rts.
AIR ANALYSES A total of 92 continuous air samples were collected during the period from 5 sites S-11 and S-12 The sampling time was approximately 168 hours0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> per sample. A 72-hour decay period was permitted on each sample prior to count-ing to eliminate natural Radon-Thoron activities.
1299 304 1
-i.mi .i - -
NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CENTER Figure 1 graphically displays the monthly averages from the two sampling s tations .
RAINWATER ANALYSES A total of 2 7 samples were collected from sites S-Il and S-12 The radio-acti"ity content of the rainwater, as shown in Figure 2, does not indicate any significant changes from the previous periods.
SOIL ^NALYSES A total of 108 soil samples were collected from the sampling sites indicated in Table I. The radioactivity content of the soil samples, as shown in Figure 3, indicates a relatively stable trend.
VEGETATION ANALYSES A total of 108 vegetation samples were collected and processed from the same areas as the soil samples. The samples indicated no increase in radioactivity content. The overall trend was quite typical. The monthly averages are shown in Figure 4.
WATER ANALYSES A total of 120 water samples were collected from the sites indicated in Table I. The combined monthly averages for drinking water and pond water are shown in Figure 5. The water samples indicate only a very slight variation in radio-activity.
DISCUSSION Analysis of the data for the overall environmental samples indicates a reasonably stable trend in their radioactivity conten'., with no significant changes from previous sampling periods.
1299 305 U
NORTHROP RESEARCH h TECHNOLOGY CENTER At times the radioactivity content of the environmental samples changed due
~
to climatic conditions, the prevailing winds (with the change in seasons), and the tempe rature inversions in the Los Angeles basin. The smog content in the air during periods of temperature inversions tends to increase the natural background radioactivity of the air.
Since the overall radioactivity content of the environmental samples was reasonably stable, it is apparent that the Northrop Reactor and associated facilities have not contributed significantly to the natural radioactivity background. '
1299 306 z
3
M__
NORTHROP RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CENTER TABLE I S AMPLING SITES SITE LOCATION S AMPLES TAKEN 2
S-1 Reactor Soil, vegetation, and drinking water S-2 Imperial Highway and Soil, vegets. tion, and drinking water Inglewood Blvd.
S-3 Imperial Highway and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Sepulveda Blvd.
S-4 Prairie Avenue and Soil, vegetation, and pond water Redondo Beach Blvd. (Alondra Park)
S-5 Hawthorne Blvd. and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Redondo Beach Blvd.
S-6 Hawthorne Blvd. and Soil, vegetation, and inking water 190th St.
S-7 Normandie and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water El Segundo Blvd.
S-8 Rosecrans and Central Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Avenue S-9 Hawthorne Blvd. and Drinking water Century Avenue S-10 La Brea Avenue and Soil, vegetation, and drinking water Slauson Avenue S-11 Atop Engineering Center Air (particulates), and rainwater
_ 900 yards west of reactor S-12 Atop Plant III, 200 yards Air (particulates), and rainwater east of reactor 1299 307 4
P
- 3. 0 1
- 2. 5 -
- 2. 0 -
c.
.N_ _
O
- 1. 5 -
m i
o
~ ~
- 1. 0 t .
.T .
o l
.o..
l a
l3 . 3 ==
.S -
t -
$ i F > 0 g =
- e > z ,
a 4 -
w O O W < a < 1 < 3 % a a O Z c n N 2 < y , q <
I 1978 1979 FIG. 1 Monthly Averages of Continuous Air Samples Frotn Sites S-11 & S-12.
1,99 2 508
m u
m u
a u
m wI R
u m
m u R i
u m
m u
A wh e
I t
m u
I u
s t m
u
- s. l u )
m l I m
/ t i
C
- p t t
s .
m u ~ wl .
m 0 3 1
( .
m t .
i _
y m
u t I u i m v i
t wI _
c n A a n n a n i i i i
a a a i m
f r a a a _
e s R R R R R R t
a o o o o o o N N N s W #
2 M N N m
u m i n t a
R ~
- e a
r u T u e P T V C N l
l R R Y G s
u C E A A N L E O A E P U U U e
S O N D J F M A M J J A r
a r
u n
e*
- C~*
- ~N<W UCD m
e NsO, N i vEg:rY ><$ ,T" R 9Rp . i
"< a ,, mv3T*
m m*y 5EmM 0 C R- m' F i
m m
u
- l. 5 O 1. 0 -
.c -
..a o
, x s
O -
i e
c u
's see a .
- t m
e .
C O
- 0. 5 0 .
u 0
o .
m F
1 b > 0 g ::: % e > g , -
W O O ta < W < 1 < g X m O Z c , a 2 < 2 , g q 1978 1979 FIG. 3 Monthly Averages of Soil Samples ?99 310 From Stre s S-1 Thru S-8 & S-10,
- l. 5 -
efMb i
< 1. 0 L.
Q i
E 2
U -
<r e
o
.s 0. 5 -
.2 u .
c
.b
._ ce T
-2 9
i S > 0 z c d e > ~ ,
g
- W O O bi < W < a < ' ~
m O Z Q , 4 2 < 2 $ $ Q l
1978 l 1979 FIG. 4 Monthly Ave rages of Vegetation Samples From Sites S-1 Thrv. S-8 & S-10.
1299 311
M e m ul s-I I
1 I _
t.
I I
I I
)
l m w
/
i I
Cp R
R 0
r 1 8
(
wI 8
y t e i
i v
B t
c A e r
e ~ I t
a W a a
T P T V C N l R R Y G e
C O E l
E A A N l E A P U U U e
S O N D J F M A M J J A g.m
~ ._mND
~
n rN
~OOW
~-
uN js0,u t
i Xoc"r * ><$j?n O* M9n0 i496~O*
n no3 $au mL dvt: m8 ~
1 M
- 1
'5 .
M