ML12258A200: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/01/2012
| issue date = 08/01/2012
| title = Transmittal of Final Report for Seabrook Station Plume & Post Plume Biennial Exercise, Conducted on April 17-18, 2012
| title = Transmittal of Final Report for Seabrook Station Plume & Post Plume Biennial Exercise, Conducted on April 17-18, 2012
| author name = Colman S L
| author name = Colman S
| author affiliation = US Dept of Homeland Security, US Federal Emergency Mgmt Agency (FEMA)
| author affiliation = US Dept of Homeland Security, US Federal Emergency Mgmt Agency (FEMA)
| addressee name = Dean W M
| addressee name = Dean W
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I
| docket = 05000443
| docket = 05000443
Line 18: Line 18:


==Dear Mr. Dean:==
==Dear Mr. Dean:==
Enclosed is a copy of the Final Report for the Seabrook Station Plume and Post Plume Biennial Exercise, conducted on April 17-18, 2012.The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of New Hampshire, State of Maine and local emergency response organizations successfully demonstrated their capabilities to implement their off-site radiological emergency response plans and procedures based on the evaluation of this exercise by a team of Federal evaluators with final determinations made by the Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) Chair.There were four Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) as a result of this exercise.
 
There were no deficiencies.
Enclosed is a copy of the Final Report for the Seabrook Station Plume and Post Plume Biennial Exercise, conducted on April 17-18, 2012.
There are four open ARCAs as a result of this exercise:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of New Hampshire, State of Maine and local emergency response organizations successfully demonstrated their capabilities to implement their off-site radiological emergency response plans and procedures based on the evaluation of this exercise by a team of Federal evaluators with final determinations made by the Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) Chair.
one due to Emergency Operations Facility not providing adequate instructions to Field Teams. The three remaining ARCA's at Kingston, Newfields and Portsmouth Emergency Operations Centers were that the Radiological Officers failed to provide adequate dosimetery briefings to Emergency Workers. State and local preparedness remains adequate to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of the Seabrook Station and provides reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can be taken off-site in the event of a radiological emergency.
There were four Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) as a result of this exercise. There were no deficiencies. There are four open ARCAs as a result of this exercise: one due to Emergency Operations Facility not providing adequate instructions to Field Teams. The three remaining ARCA's at Kingston, Newfields and Portsmouth Emergency Operations Centers were that the Radiological Officers failed to provide adequate dosimetery briefings to Emergency Workers. State and local preparedness remains adequate to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of the Seabrook Station and provides reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can be taken off-site in the event of a radiological emergency.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (617) 832-4731, or John Rice at (617) 956-7509.www.fema.gov VIM U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region I 99 High St., 5t Floor Boston, MA 02110-2320
If you have any questions, please contact me at (617) 832-4731, or John Rice at (617) 956-7509.
~FEI4A.Sincerely, Steve L. Colman Regional Assistance Committee Chair cc: NRC Headquarters Document Control Desk Nancy McNamara, Liaison Officer, NRC Region I Steve Colman, Branch Chief, FEMA RI Enclosure www.fema.gov Seabrook Station After Action Report/Improvement Plan Exercise Date -April 18, 2012 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program.. FE-.A Published August 01, 2012 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station This page is intentionally blank.
www.fema.gov VIM
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Seabrook Station After Action Report/Improvement Plan Published August 01, 2012 Contents Executive Summary 8 Section 1: Exercise Overview 9 1.1 Exercise Details 9 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership 9 1.3 Participating Organizations 10 Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 11 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design 11 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities 11 2.3 Scenario Summary 11 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 12 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results 12 3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation 12 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 41 3.3.1 Massachusetts Jurisdictions 41 3.3.1.1 Massachusetts State Emergency Operations Center 41 3.3.1.2 MA Region I EOC 41 3.3.1.3 MA (SS) Joint Information Center 41 3.3.1.4 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1 42 3.3.1.5 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 42 3.3.1.6 MA Media Center 42 3.3.1.7 MA State Laboratory  
 
-Day 2 43 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions 43 3.3.2.1 Amesbury Local EOC 43 3.3.2.2 Merrimac Local EOC 43 3.3.2.3 Newbury Local EOC 44 3.3.2.4 Newburyport Local EOC 44 1 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.5 Salisbury Local EOC 44 3.3.2.6 West Newbury Local EOC 45 3.3.2.7 Amesbury:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region I 99 High St., 5t Floor Boston, MA 02110-2320
Amesbury Schools Superintendent 45 3.3.2.8 Pentucket Schools Superintendent 45 3.3.2.9 Amesbury:
                                                            ~FEI4A.
Amesbury Academy Charter 46 3.3.2.10 Amesbury:
Sincerely, Steve L. Colman Regional Assistance Committee Chair cc:   NRC Headquarters Document Control Desk Nancy McNamara, Liaison Officer, NRC Region I Steve Colman, Branch Chief, FEMA RI Enclosure www.fema.gov
Cashman School 46 3.3.2.11 Amesbury:
 
Little Sprouts Daycare 46 3.3.2.12 Amesbury:
Seabrook Station After Action Report/
Sparhawk Lower School 47 3.3.2.13 Methuen: Timony School 47 3.3.2.14 Amesbury:Camp Bauercrest 47 3.3.2.15 Newburyport:
Improvement Plan Exercise Date - April 18, 2012 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program
Residential Options 48 3.3.2.16 Newbury: Triton Supt. 48 3.3.2.17 Newburyport:
.. FE-.A                 Published August 01, 2012
Coastal Alternative School 48 3.3.2.18 Newburyport:
 
Community Action-Head Start 49 3.3.2.19 W. NewburyPathways for Learning 49 3.3.2.20 West Newbury: Learning Tree Preschool 49 3.3.2.21 Tewksbury High School 50 3.3.2.22 Salisbury:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
New Beginnings Learning Center 50 3.3.2.23 Newburyport:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station This page is intentionally blank.
Kinder Care Daniel Lucy 50 3.3.2.24 Newburyport:
 
Nock Middle School 51 3.3.2.25 Newburyport:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Newburyport Supt. 51 3.3.2.26 Newburyport:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station Seabrook Station After Action Report/Improvement Plan Published August 01, 2012 Contents Executive Summary                                                                                     8 Section 1: Exercise Overview                                                                           9 1.1 Exercise Details                                                             9 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership                                             9 1.3 Participating Organizations                                                 10 Section 2: Exercise Design Summary                                                                   11 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design                                                 11 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities                           11 2.3 Scenario Summary                                                           11 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities                                                                 12 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results                                             12 3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation                                     12 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries                                             41 3.3.1 Massachusetts Jurisdictions                                           41 3.3.1.1 Massachusetts State Emergency Operations Center                 41 3.3.1.2 MA Region I EOC                                                 41 3.3.1.3 MA (SS) Joint Information Center                                 41 3.3.1.4 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1                                 42 3.3.1.5 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2                                 42 3.3.1.6 MA Media Center                                                 42 3.3.1.7 MA State Laboratory - Day 2                                     43 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions                                                   43 3.3.2.1 Amesbury Local EOC                                               43 3.3.2.2 Merrimac Local EOC                                               43 3.3.2.3 Newbury Local EOC                                               44 3.3.2.4 Newburyport Local EOC                                           44 1
Kinder Care Low Street 51 3.3.2.27 Newburyport:
 
Mrs. Murrays Preschool 52 3.3.2.28 Newburyport:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Newburyport High School 52 3.3.2.29 Newburyport:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.2.5 Salisbury Local EOC                                               44 3.3.2.6 West Newbury Local EOC                                           45 3.3.2.7 Amesbury: Amesbury Schools Superintendent                         45 3.3.2.8 Pentucket Schools Superintendent                                 45 3.3.2.9 Amesbury: Amesbury Academy Charter                               46 3.3.2.10 Amesbury: Cashman School                                         46 3.3.2.11 Amesbury: Little Sprouts Daycare                                 46 3.3.2.12 Amesbury: Sparhawk Lower School                                   47 3.3.2.13 Methuen: Timony School                                           47 3.3.2.14 Amesbury:Camp Bauercrest                                         47 3.3.2.15 Newburyport: Residential Options                                 48 3.3.2.16 Newbury: Triton Supt.                                             48 3.3.2.17 Newburyport: Coastal Alternative School                           48 3.3.2.18 Newburyport: Community Action-Head Start                         49 3.3.2.19 W. NewburyPathways for Learning                                   49 3.3.2.20 West Newbury: Learning Tree Preschool                             49 3.3.2.21 Tewksbury High School                                             50 3.3.2.22 Salisbury: New Beginnings Learning Center                         50 3.3.2.23 Newburyport: Kinder Care Daniel Lucy                             50 3.3.2.24 Newburyport: Nock Middle School                                   51 3.3.2.25 Newburyport: Newburyport Supt.                                   51 3.3.2.26 Newburyport: Kinder Care Low Street                               51 3.3.2.27 Newburyport: Mrs. Murrays Preschool                               52 3.3.2.28 Newburyport: Newburyport High School                             52 3.3.2.29 Newburyport: Newburyport Residence                               52 3.3.2.30 Newburyport: Newburyport Montessori                               53 3.3.2.31 Newburyport: Inn Street Montessori                               53 3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions                                                 53 3.3.3.1 Lexington: Minuteman High School                                 53 3.3.3.2 Methuen: Methuen High School                                     54 3.3.3.3 Wilmington: Shriner's Auditorium                                 54 3.3.3.4 Wakefield: Wakefield High School                                 54 2
Newburyport Residence 52 3.3.2.30 Newburyport:
 
Newburyport Montessori 53 3.3.2.31 Newburyport:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Inn Street Montessori 53 3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions 53 3.3.3.1 Lexington:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                     Seabrook Station 3.3.3.5 MA KIDispensing Site-Danvers                                       55 3.3.3.6 MA State Police Assembly- Troop A                                   55 3.3.3.7 Methuen: Marash Grammer School                                     55 3.3.4 Maine Jurisdictions                                                       55 3.3.4.1 ME State Emergency Operations Center                                 56 3.3.4.2 ME State Emergency Operations Center - Day 2                         56 3.3.4.3 ME Incident Field Office                                           56 3.3.4.4 ME Incident Field Office - Day 2                                   56 3.3.4.5 ME Field Sampling Team - 1                                         56 3.3.4.6 ME State Health and Environmental Testing                           59 Laboratory 3.3.5 Risk Jurisdictions                                                       60 3.3.5.1 ME York County EOC                                                 61 3.3.6 New Hampshire Jurisdictions                                             61 3.3.6.1 NH State Emergency Operations Center                               61 3.3.6.2 NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility                               62 3.3.6.3 NH State Police Communications Center, NH State                     63 Warning Point 3.3.6.4 Rockingham County Dispatch Center                                   63 3.3.6.5 NH (SS) Joint Information Center                                   64 3.3.6.6 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1                                     64 3.3.6.7 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2                                     65 3.3.6.8 MA (SS) Emergency Operations Facility                               65 3.3.6.9 NH State Emergency Operations Center Day 2                         66 3.3.6.10 NH - Field Sampling Team - 1                                         66 3.3.6.11 NH - Field Sampling Team - 2                                         67 3.3.6.12 NH State Laboratory - Day 2                                         68 3.3.6.13 NH State EOC Local Liaison                                           69 3.3.6.14 Rochester Reception Center Dosimetry Issue and                       69 Briefing, Emergency Worker Dosimeter 3.3.7 Risk Jurisdictions                                                       69 3.3.7.1 Brentwood Local EOC                                                 69 3.3.7.2 East Kingston Local EOC                                             71 3
Minuteman High School 53 3.3.3.2 Methuen: Methuen High School 54 3.3.3.3 Wilmington:
 
Shriner's Auditorium 54 3.3.3.4 Wakefield:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Wakefield High School 54 2 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.3.5 MA KIDispensing Site-Danvers 55 3.3.3.6 MA State Police Assembly-Troop A 55 3.3.3.7 Methuen: Marash Grammer School 55 3.3.4 Maine Jurisdictions 55 3.3.4.1 ME State Emergency Operations Center 56 3.3.4.2 ME State Emergency Operations Center -Day 2 56 3.3.4.3 ME Incident Field Office 56 3.3.4.4 ME Incident Field Office -Day 2 56 3.3.4.5 ME Field Sampling Team -1 56 3.3.4.6 ME State Health and Environmental Testing 59 Laboratory 3.3.5 Risk Jurisdictions 60 3.3.5.1 ME York County EOC 61 3.3.6 New Hampshire Jurisdictions 61 3.3.6.1 NH State Emergency Operations Center 61 3.3.6.2 NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility 62 3.3.6.3 NH State Police Communications Center, NH State 63 Warning Point 3.3.6.4 Rockingham County Dispatch Center 63 3.3.6.5 NH (SS) Joint Information Center 64 3.3.6.6 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1 64 3.3.6.7 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 65 3.3.6.8 MA (SS) Emergency Operations Facility 65 3.3.6.9 NH State Emergency Operations Center Day 2 66 3.3.6.10 NH -Field Sampling Team -1 66 3.3.6.11 NH -Field Sampling Team -2 67 3.3.6.12 NH State Laboratory  
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.3 Exeter Local EOC                                                 71 3.3.7.4 Greenland Local EOC                                               71 3.3.7.5 Hampton Local EOC                                                 72 3.3.7.6 Hampton Falls Local EOC                                           72 3.3.7.7 Kensington Local EOC                                             72 3.3.7.8 Kingston NH Local EOC                                             73 3.3.7.9 New Castle Local EOC                                             76 3.3.7.10 Newfields Local EOC                                               76 3.3.7.11 Newton Local EOC                                                 77 3.3.7.12 North Hampton Local EOC                                           78 3.3.7.13 Portsmouth Local EOC                                             78 3.3.7.14 Rye Local EOC                                                     81 3.3.7.15 Seabrook Local EOC                                               81 3.3.7.16 South Hampton Local EOC                                           81 3.3.7.17 Stratham Local EOC                                               83 3.3.7.18 Adeline C. Marston School                                         84 3.3.7.19 Coorperative Middle School                                       85 3.3.7.20 Heronfield Academy                                               85 3.3.7.21 Winnacunnet High School                                           85 3.3.7.22 Seabrook Elementary School                                       86 3.3.7.23 Lincoln Street Elementary School                                 86 3.3.7.24 Swasey Central School                                             86 3.3.7.25 Kensignton Elementary School                                     87 3.3.7.26 Sanborn Region High School                                       87 3.3.7.27 Memorial School                                                   87 3.3.7.28 Exeter High School                                               88 3.3.7.29 Hampton Academy                                                   88 3.3.7.30 North Hampton School                                             88 3.3.7.31 Greenland Central School                                         89 3.3.7.32 New Franklin School                                               89 3.3.7.33 Lister Academy                                                   89 3.3.7.34 A Place to Grow                                                   90 4
-Day 2 68 3.3.6.13 NH State EOC Local Liaison 69 3.3.6.14 Rochester Reception Center Dosimetry Issue and 69 Briefing, Emergency Worker Dosimeter 3.3.7 Risk Jurisdictions 69 3.3.7.1 Brentwood Local EOC 69 3.3.7.2 East Kingston Local EOC 71 3 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.3 Exeter Local EOC 71 3.3.7.4 Greenland Local EOC 71 3.3.7.5 Hampton Local EOC 72 3.3.7.6 Hampton Falls Local EOC 72 3.3.7.7 Kensington Local EOC 72 3.3.7.8 Kingston NH Local EOC 73 3.3.7.9 New Castle Local EOC 76 3.3.7.10 Newfields Local EOC 76 3.3.7.11 Newton Local EOC 77 3.3.7.12 North Hampton Local EOC 78 3.3.7.13 Portsmouth Local EOC 78 3.3.7.14 Rye Local EOC 81 3.3.7.15 Seabrook Local EOC 81 3.3.7.16 South Hampton Local EOC 81 3.3.7.17 Stratham Local EOC 83 3.3.7.18 Adeline C. Marston School 84 3.3.7.19 Coorperative Middle School 85 3.3.7.20 Heronfield Academy 85 3.3.7.21 Winnacunnet High School 85 3.3.7.22 Seabrook Elementary School 86 3.3.7.23 Lincoln Street Elementary School 86 3.3.7.24 Swasey Central School 86 3.3.7.25 Kensignton Elementary School 87 3.3.7.26 Sanborn Region High School 87 3.3.7.27 Memorial School 87 3.3.7.28 Exeter High School 88 3.3.7.29 Hampton Academy 88 3.3.7.30 North Hampton School 88 3.3.7.31 Greenland Central School 89 3.3.7.32 New Franklin School 89 3.3.7.33 Lister Academy 89 3.3.7.34 A Place to Grow 90 4 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.35 Rockingham County Nursing Home 90 3.3.7.36 Polka Dots Childcare Center 90 3.3.7.37 Appleseeds Day Care 91 3.3.7.38 Donna Clarke Family Day Care 91 3.3.7.39 Stratharn Circle Learning Center 91 3.3.7.40 Great Bay Kid's Company 92 3.3.7.41 Newton Learning Center 92 3.3.7.42 Over the Rainbow 92 3.3.7.43 My First School 93 3.3.7.44 Imprints Day School 93 3.3.7.45 Kids Stop Inc. 93 3.3.7.46 Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Ctr 94 3.3.7.47 The Ridge at Riverwoods 94 3.3.7.48 DeColores Childrens Center 94 3.3.7.49 Clipper Habor of Portsmouth CRC 95 3.3.7.50 The Childrens Garden 95 3.3.7.51 Edgewood Center 95 3.3.7.52 Edgewood Learning Center 96 3.3.7.53 Kindercare Learning Center 96 3.3.7.54 Kathleen Tostenson 96 3.3.7.55 Pats Family Child Care 97 3.3.7.56 Live Y'ers 97 3.3.8 Support Jurisdictions 97 3.3.8.1 Rochester Local EOC 98 3.3.8.2 Dover Local EOC 98 3.3.8.3 Manchester Local EOC 98 3.3.8.4 Manchester MHS Reception Center Portal & 98 Secondary Monitoring 3.3.8.5 Rochester Reception Center 99 3.3.8.6 Rochester Reception Center Vehicles 99 3.3.8.7 Rochester Reception Center Registration 99 3.3.8.8 Manchester HS Reception Center Operations 100 5 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8.9 Manchester Reception Center Dosimetry 100 3.3.8.10 Manchester Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon 100 3.3.8.11 Manchester Reception Center Female Mon/Decon 102 3.3.8.12 Manchester Reception Center Registration 102 3.3.8.13 Manchester Reception Center Male Decon 102 3.3.8.14 Manchester Reception Center Portal & Secondary 104 Monitoring 3.3.8.15 Rochester Reception Center Portal and Secondary 105 Monitoring 3.3.8.16 Rochester Reception Center Male Monitoring/Decon 105 3.3.8.17 Rochester Reception Center Female 108 Monitoring/Decon 3.3.8.18 Rockingham County State Transportation Staging 108 Area 3.3.8.19 Wentworth Douglas Hospital 109 3.3.8.20 Elliot Hospital 109 Section 4: Conclusion 110 Appendix A: Improvement Plan 111 Appendix B: Best Practices 119 Appendix C: Exercise Timeline 121 Appendix D: Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders 127 6 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station This page is intentionally blank.7 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station EXECUTIVE  
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                     Seabrook Station 3.3.7.35 Rockingham County Nursing Home                                     90 3.3.7.36 Polka Dots Childcare Center                                         90 3.3.7.37 Appleseeds Day Care                                                 91 3.3.7.38 Donna Clarke Family Day Care                                       91 3.3.7.39 Stratharn Circle Learning Center                                   91 3.3.7.40 Great Bay Kid's Company                                             92 3.3.7.41 Newton Learning Center                                             92 3.3.7.42 Over the Rainbow                                                   92 3.3.7.43 My First School                                                     93 3.3.7.44 Imprints Day School                                                 93 3.3.7.45 Kids Stop Inc.                                                     93 3.3.7.46 Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Ctr                             94 3.3.7.47 The Ridge at Riverwoods                                             94 3.3.7.48 DeColores Childrens Center                                         94 3.3.7.49 Clipper Habor of Portsmouth CRC                                     95 3.3.7.50 The Childrens Garden                                               95 3.3.7.51 Edgewood Center                                                     95 3.3.7.52 Edgewood Learning Center                                           96 3.3.7.53 Kindercare Learning Center                                         96 3.3.7.54 Kathleen Tostenson                                                 96 3.3.7.55 Pats Family Child Care                                             97 3.3.7.56 Live Y'ers                                                         97 3.3.8 Support Jurisdictions                                                   97 3.3.8.1 Rochester Local EOC                                               98 3.3.8.2 Dover Local EOC                                                   98 3.3.8.3 Manchester Local EOC                                               98 3.3.8.4 Manchester MHS Reception Center Portal &                           98 Secondary Monitoring 3.3.8.5 Rochester Reception Center                                         99 3.3.8.6 Rochester Reception Center Vehicles                               99 3.3.8.7 Rochester Reception Center Registration                           99 3.3.8.8 Manchester HS Reception Center Operations                         100 5
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                     Seabrook Station 3.3.8.9 Manchester Reception Center Dosimetry                             100 3.3.8.10 Manchester Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon                     100 3.3.8.11 Manchester Reception Center Female Mon/Decon                     102 3.3.8.12 Manchester Reception Center Registration                         102 3.3.8.13 Manchester Reception Center Male Decon                           102 3.3.8.14 Manchester Reception Center Portal & Secondary                   104 Monitoring 3.3.8.15 Rochester Reception Center Portal and Secondary                   105 Monitoring 3.3.8.16 Rochester Reception Center Male Monitoring/Decon                 105 3.3.8.17 Rochester Reception Center Female                                 108 Monitoring/Decon 3.3.8.18 Rockingham County State Transportation Staging                   108 Area 3.3.8.19 Wentworth Douglas Hospital                                       109 3.3.8.20 Elliot Hospital                                                   109 Section 4: Conclusion                                                                               110 Appendix A: Improvement Plan                                                                       111 Appendix B: Best Practices                                                                         119 Appendix C: Exercise Timeline                                                                       121 Appendix D: Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders                                                   127 6
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station This page is intentionally blank.
7
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station EXECUTIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
On April 17, 2012 and April 18, 2012, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Preparedness Directorate, National Preparedness Division, Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region I conducted an exercise in the 10-mile plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone and the 50-mile ingestion exposure pathway emergency planning zone around the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. Interviews and out-of-sequence demonstrations for schools, other special facilities, and reception, monitoring, and decontamination centers (as outlined in this report) were conducted within 60 days of the exercise.
The purpose of the exercise and out-of-sequence activities was to assess the level of State and local preparedness in responding to a radiological emergency.
This exercise was held in accordance with FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans (RERP) and procedures.
DHS wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals in The State of New Hampshire, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Maine, local communities, and private and volunteer organizations that participated in this exercise.Protecting the public health and safety is the full-time job of some of the exercise participants and an additional assigned responsibility for others. Still others have willingly sought this responsibility by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities.
Cooperation and teamwork of all the participants were evident during this exercise.This report contains the final evaluation of the biennial exercise and the out-of-sequence activities.
8 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW 1.1 Exercise Details Exercise Name Seabrook Station Type of Exercise Ingestion Exercise Date April 18, 2012 Program Department of Homeland Security/FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Scenario Type Radiological Emergency 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership Steve Colman RAC Chair FEMA -Region One -REP Branch REP Branch Chief 99 High Street, Fifth Floor Boston, Massachusetts, 02110 617-832-4731 Steve. Colman@dhs.gov John Rice Senior Technological Hazards Specialist FEMA -Region One -REP Branch Senior Technological Hazards Specialist 99 High Street, Fifth Floor 9 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Boston, Massachusetts, 02110 617-956-7509 John.Rice@dhs.gov Melissa Savilonis Site Specialist FEMA -Region One -REP Branch Technological Hazards Specialist 99 High Street, Fifth Floor Boston, Massachusetts, 02110 617-956-7559 Melissa. Savilonis@dhs.gov


===1.3 Participating===
On April 17, 2012 and April 18, 2012, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS),
Preparedness Directorate, National Preparedness Division, Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region I conducted an exercise in the 10-mile plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone and the 50-mile ingestion exposure pathway emergency planning zone around the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. Interviews and out-of-sequence demonstrations for schools, other special facilities, and reception, monitoring, and decontamination centers (as outlined in this report) were conducted within 60 days of the exercise. The purpose of the exercise and out-of-sequence activities was to assess the level of State and local preparedness in responding to a radiological emergency. This exercise was held in accordance with FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans (RERP) and procedures.
DHS wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals in The State of New Hampshire, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Maine, local communities, and private and volunteer organizations that participated in this exercise.
Protecting the public health and safety is the full-time job of some of the exercise participants and an additional assigned responsibility for others. Still others have willingly sought this responsibility by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities.
Cooperation and teamwork of all the participants were evident during this exercise.
This report contains the final evaluation of the biennial exercise and the out-of-sequence activities.
8


Organizations Agencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the Seabrook Station exercise: 10 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN  
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                  Seabrook Station SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW 1.1 Exercise Details Exercise Name Seabrook Station Type of Exercise Ingestion Exercise Date April 18, 2012 Program Department of Homeland Security/FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Scenario Type Radiological Emergency 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership Steve Colman RAC Chair FEMA - Region One - REP Branch REP Branch Chief 99 High Street, Fifth Floor Boston, Massachusetts, 02110 617-832-4731 Steve. Colman@dhs.gov John Rice Senior Technological Hazards Specialist FEMA - Region One - REP Branch Senior Technological Hazards Specialist 99 High Street, Fifth Floor 9
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station Boston, Massachusetts, 02110 617-956-7509 John.Rice@dhs.gov Melissa Savilonis Site Specialist FEMA - Region One - REP Branch Technological Hazards Specialist 99 High Street, Fifth Floor Boston, Massachusetts, 02110 617-956-7559 Melissa. Savilonis@dhs.gov 1.3 Participating Organizations Agencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the Seabrook Station exercise:
10
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==


===2.1 Exercise===
2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design The FEMA Region I evaluated the exercise on April 17, 2012 and April 18, 2012, to assess the capabilities of local emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERPs) and procedures to protect the public health and safety during a radiological emergency involving Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. The purpose of this report is to present the results and findings on the performance of the offsite response organizations (OROs) during a simulated radiological emergency in the HSEEP format.
Purpose and Design The FEMA Region I evaluated the exercise on April 17, 2012 and April 18, 2012, to assess the capabilities of local emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERPs) and procedures to protect the public health and safety during a radiological emergency involving Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. The purpose of this report is to present the results and findings on the performance of the offsite response organizations (OROs) during a simulated radiological emergency in the HSEEP format.2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities
2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities 2.3 Scenario Summary The exercise scenario was developed to evaluate the response of the exercise participants to a radiological emergency. The scenario is listed in Appendix: Exercise Plan.
11
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results This section contains the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the April 17, 2012 and April 18, 2012 Ingestion Plume Exercise, conducted to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of State and local governments in the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station 10-Mile and 50-Mile Emergency Planning Zone.
Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated on its demonstration of criteria contained in the exercise evaluation areas as outlined in the federal Register, Volume 67, No. 80 "FEMA -
Radiological Emergency Preparedness: Exercise Evaluation Methodology" (April 25, 2002).
Detailed information on the evaluation area criteria and the extent-of-play agreements for the drill are included as appendices to this report.
3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation The matrix presented in the table on following pages presents the status of all exercise evaluation area criteria that were scheduled for demonstration during the drill by all participating jurisdictions and functional entities. Exercise criteria are listed by number, and the demonstration status of those criteria are indicated by the use of the following letters:
M - Met (No Deficiency or ARCAs assessed and no unresolved ARCAs from prior exercise) A -
ARCAs assessed or unresolved ARCAs from previous exercises D - Deficiency assessed P - Plan Issues N - Not Demonstrated 12
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                      Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (14 pages)
DATE: 2012-04-18                                                                0 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                            .    "
M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated                                            C L n    V Ln Emergency OperationsManagement        .            .    ..
Mobilization                                                                        lal  M M M M M M M M MM M Facilities                                                                          IbI        M        M Direction and Control                                                                lcl  M M    M        M M M Communications Equipment                                                            Idl  M M M M M M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                        lel  M M M M M M M M M M M ProtetiveAction Decision Making :
Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                  2al  M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                              2bl  M M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                              2b2  M PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional          2cl  M              M M M needs Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure              2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase              2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return Protective Action lmplmrnentation Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                3al      M  M M M M P M M M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl          M      M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and              3cl  M              M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and              3c2  M              M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                        3dl  M              M M M M Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                        3d2          M M      M M M M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                      3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                      3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return                  3fl Decisions Field Measurement and Analysis RESERVED                                                                            4al              P  M Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                          4a2      A Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                          4a3              M P Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                    4bl Laboratory Operations                                                              4c 1 Emergency Notifi~atirn and Public Info Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5al  M      M RESERVED                                                                            5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and.Notification System                              5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                5bl  M        M      M M M M Support Operations/Facilities            .
Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                          6a1 13
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bl and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                    6cl Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals              6dl 14
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                          Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 2/14)
DATE: 2012-04-18                                                  p, U o SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                        Q        W    W,        W0 M
M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                                            0                    0 Demonstrated                                              E    -
Emergency Operation".Mariagement,:.>/::            . ...      ..
Mobilization                                                                          lal  M M M M M M M M M M M Facilities                                                                            IbI                          M Direction and Control                                                                lct  M M MIM M M MIM              M Communications Equipment                                                              ldl  M M MIM M M      MMM        M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                          lel  M M M M M M M M M                M Protective Action Decision Making                                                            .
Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                    2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional            2cl  M M M M M M M M needs Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure                2d I Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase                2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return Protective.Action Implementation Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                  3al  M M M      P M A M M A          M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl        M M M M M M M M M                M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                3cl  M M M M M M M M              M access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                3c2  M M M M M M M M M                M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                          3dl  M M M M M M M M M M M Implementation ofTraffic and Access Control                                          3d2  M M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                        3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                        3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return                    3fl Decisions Field.MNasu**mcnt and Analysisi  .,        .:...
RESERVED                                                                              4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                            4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                            4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                      4b]
Laboratory Operations                                                                4c I EmergencyNotfifcati*"nand PublicInfo                                                                            ..
Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                5al RESERVED                                                                              5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                  5b]  M M M M M M M M M M M Monort ipe.aDiontamin                . R.g,,..atio.
Riaies      "      Evacuees            ,.                    .
*Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                          16al 15
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6b]
and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                    6c 1 Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals              6d]
16
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                              Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 3/14) 0 DATE: 2012-04-18 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                      0                  W.
M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                            0                                  U Demonstrated                                          W          iUU                  )C
                                                                                          ~- ~ ~j
                                                                                                .~        U      CL)  Cd      C) a 0            0 Emergency Operations Management                                                              *  .    .          C;; ....      "A Mobilization                                                                      lal  M M M M M              IM M M          M Facilities                                                                        lbl                M        I    I Direction and Control                                                              lcI  M    IM M M            M M      M M Communications Equipment                                                          Idl  M      M M M            M M      M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                      lel  M M M                    M M M M Protective Action Decision Making                                      - ....
Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                  2a1                            M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                              2bl                            M M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                              2b2                            M PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs  2cl  M      M                M Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure            2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase              2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return Protective Action Implementation :.
Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                3al  M M M                          M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public    3bl  M P    M                      M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and            3cl  M      M M M                      M access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and            3c2  M M M                              M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                      3dl  M P    M M M            M        M Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                      3d2  M M M M M                M        M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                      3e1 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                      3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation. Reentry, and Return Decisions      3f1 lField Measurement and Analyis RESERVED                                                                          4a I Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                        4a2                                  M Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                        4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                  4bl Laboratory Operations                                                              4c I Emergency Notificationand Public Info Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                            5a]                            M RESERVED                                                                          5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                            5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                            5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                5bl  M M M M M                M            M Support Operations/Facilities. "                                                                          '..    !L 17
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                        6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment          6bI and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                        6cl Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals                  6dl 18
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                                      Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 4/14)
DATE: 2012-04-18                                                            .                    0 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                                    W.                    -
Demonstrated                                                    Cn          .
                                                                                                    <  UE U' Emergency Operations Management                                                              ...      .            .        .
Mobilization                                                                            lal M M M              M M M M M M M Facilities                                                                              1b 1 Direction and Control                                                                  Icl            M      M M M M M Communications Equipment                                                                Idl M M M              M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                            lel M M M              M M M M M Protective Action Decision Making          *                        .      .. *. ..
Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                      2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                  2b]
Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                  2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs      2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure                2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase                  2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation........"                                                          .    .      .
Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                    3al      M M M        M M M M M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public        3bl      M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                3cl            M      M M M      M M access/functional needs                                                                                            I I Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                3c2            M M          M M    M M      M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                          3dl            M M M M M M Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                          3d2            M M M          M M M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                          3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                          3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation. Reentry, and Return Decisions          3f1 FieId Measurement and Analysis          . ..          :    .        ...    ._                                      _."
RESERVED                                                                              4al        M M    _
Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                            4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                            4a3        M M  _
Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                      4bl Laboratory Operations                                                                  4c I EmergencY Notification and Public Info.                                                .    .              ."
Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                5al RESERVED                                                                              5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                    5bl            M      M M M M        M Support Operations/Facilities                                  "
Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                              6al 19
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment          6bl and Vehicles
.Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                      6c 1 Injured Individuals                6dl Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated 20
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                                Seabrook Station Table 3.1        -  Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 5/14) r -IC4        _  -*      ,4 DATE: 2012-04-18 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH,                                                    '
                                                                                                  = ' 0                            -
M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                                        En W  _ "  _
Demonstrated Emergency Operations Manageme3              "      :..        ::.  ..                    :.        .  .    . .    ...
Mobilization                                                                              lal            MIM      M Facilities                                                                                Ib1                      M Direction and Control                                                                      IcI                      M Communications Equipment                                                                  Idl    M      MM        M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                              lel    M M    M M P M ProtectiveAction Decision Making                                                                                    M Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                        2al        M            M M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                      2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                      2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs          2c0 Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure                    2d]        M                M Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase                    2el        M                M Relocation. Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation            .          ....
Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                        3al      M    P M M        M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public            3bl            M M      M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                    3c1 access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                    3c2 access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                              3dl        M                M Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                              3d2                          M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                              3el  _    M                  M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                              3e2  _    M                  M Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions 3171_                    M                  M FieldMeasurementand Analysis                    .                        . ..
RESERVED                                                                                  4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                                4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                                4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                          4b]            M M Laboratory Operations                                                                      4c I    M            M Eirigency Notification and Pifi*iilifnto" Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                    5al        M RESERVED                                                                                  5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                    5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                    5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                        5b]    M  M            M M Support Operations/Facilities                                "
Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                                  6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment                    6b 1 and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                                6c 1 21
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                          Seabrook Station Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals                16dI I I I I 22
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                  Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 6/14)
DATE: 2012-04-18                                          U                          E SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                      c                    C)
M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: NotoCt,                            a Demonstrated                                          U -        . .    .E-Emergency Operations Management                                              e?
Mobilization                                                                        lal  M M    M            M Facilities                                                                          lbl  M Direction and Control                                                              Icl    M M  M M            M Communications Equipment                                                            Idl  M M  M M            M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                        lel  M P M  M            M Protective Action Decision Making                                  .
Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                  2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                              2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                              2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs    2c]        M Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure              2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase              2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return Protective Action Implementation '
Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                3al  M P M            M        M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public      3bl  M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and              3cl access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and              3c2 access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                        3dl  M        IM Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                        3d2  N Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                      3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                      3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation. Reentry, and Return Decisions        3fl Field Measureieit and Analysis      .
RESERVED                                                                            4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                          4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                          4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                    4bl    M Laboratory Operations                                                              4cI      M Emergency Notification and Public Info ..                .      .,. ..  .::"::..
Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5al RESERVED                                                                            5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                5bl  M 23
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                      Seabrook Station Support Operations/Facilities                                        .
Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                        6al    M Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment          6bl  M and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                        6c 1 Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals                  6dI 24
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                                                    Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 7/14) 0 00 DATE: 2012-04-18                                                                                            .
SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                                  E    9                          .
M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                                            W W W Demonstrated                                                          ,
od        c      U M      U`  U        U
'Emergency Operations Management Mobilization                                                                                lal                                                M Facilities                                                                                  IbI                                                M Direction and Control                                                                      IcI                                                M Communications Equipment                                                                    IdI                                                M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                                lel                                                M Protective.Action Decision Making  .                    .                  ...
Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                          2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                      2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                      2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs          2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure                    2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase                      2el Relocation. Reentry. and Return Protective Action Implementation          ....                                                                      ...* :  :..
Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                        3al        M            M                  M M M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public            3bl                                                M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                    3c                                                  M access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                    3c2                                                M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                              3d]  M Implementation    of Traffic and Access Control                                            3d2 Implementation    of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                          3el Implementation    of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                          3e2 Implementation    of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions            3f1 FieldMeasurementand Analysis..............                                                                                                  '"  "
RESERVED                                                                                  4a 1 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                                4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                                4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                          4bl Laboratory Operations                                                                      4c 1 Emierency Notificationand Public Info Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                    5al RESERVED                                                                                  5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                    5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                    5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                        5bl Support Operations/Facilities .                  .7.
25
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                Seabrook Station Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                        6a]    M M P M MIAIM Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment          6bl  p      M M and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                        6c 1 Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals                  6d1                            M 26
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                      Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 8/14)
                                                                                                          "a 0.0              0  0 00
                                                                                              .0 DATE: 2012-04-18 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                              *
* E.      E M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                                                  '!z Demonstrated                                          U=,          "            0 U04 Emergency Operations Management Mobilization                                                                      lal  M M M M M M M M M Facilities                                                                        IbI Direction and Control                                                            Icl Communications Equipment                                                          Idl Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                      lel Protective Action Decision Making            .            .
Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                  2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                              2b 1 Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                              2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs  2c6 Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure            2d]
Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase              2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return Proteccnve'Action lmplementation :...                                                                ..    . ....
Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public    3bl  M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and            3ci access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and            3c2  M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                      3dl Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                      3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                      3e 1 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                      3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions      3fl Field Medsdrement and Analysis                                                                          .
RESERVED                                                                          4a I Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                        4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                        4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                  4bl Laboratory Operations                                                              4c]
Emergency Notification and Public Info Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                            5al RESERVED                                                                          5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                            5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                            5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                5bl Support Operations/Facilities                                                              .
27
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                        6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment          6bl and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                        6c]1 Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals                  6dI M 28
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                                      Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 9/14) o DATE: 2012-04-18                                                                        0        >1      It SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                          -"
M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                                      "<        E        4 V            n Demonstrated                                                          0 =          M<
Ma 5      '  6    -    E Emergency Operations Management                                                .                                :
Mobilization                                                                            lal  M MIM MIM MI M M M M Facilities                                                                              IbI Direction and Control                                                                    Icl Communications Equipment                                                                Id1 Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                            lel Protective Action Decision Making Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                        2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                    2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                    2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs        2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure                  2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase                    2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation          ...                        "..
Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                      3a1 Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public          3bl M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                  3cl access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                  3c2 M M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                            3dl Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                            3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                            3e1 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                            3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions 3fl Field Meas: ment and.Analysis                            . .    .                                    *      .    :              ,
RESERVED                                                                                4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                              4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                              4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                        4b1 Laboratory Operations                                                                    4c I EEmergency Notification and Public Info .. .                      .    .        .        ....  "'<*    . $'" 4:          ..    "
Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                  5al RESERVED                                                                                5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                  5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                  5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                      5bl Support Operations/Facilities        ..                                                                                      .
Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                                6al 29
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment          6b]
and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                        6c I Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals                  6d1 30
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                                        Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 10/14)
C.
0            o DATE: 2012-04-18                                                                              EX,        .
SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                                          "      =        >
M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                                        -i.
Demonstrated                                                              2  5 E        C)
Emergen&#xfd; Operatinis Management Mobilization                                                                                  lal  M M M M M M M M M M Facilities                                                                                    1bi Direction and Control                                                                        Ic1 Communications Equipment                                                                      Id1 Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                                  l el Protective Action.Decision Making                                                  ....                                            :..,... : :i Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                            2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                        2b]
Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                        2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs              2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure                        2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase                        2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return Protective Action4rmplementation Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                          3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public                3bl  M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                        3cl access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and                        3c2  M M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                                  3dl Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                                  3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                                3e I Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                                3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions                  3f.
Field,M'ceasureifient and Anialysis RESERVED                                                                                      4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                                  4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                                  4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                            4bI Laboratory Operations                                                                        4c I Emergency Notificati0n.af..Public Info                                                        ..                          l..
Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                        5al RESERVED                                                                                      5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                        5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                                        5a4 Emergency Information        ~~and
                  .... ~~~~'.... Instructions for the
                                ~~~~~~~~~~            ':*":Public
* and the..
Media
                                                                          ..            ".. 5b1.:
* i!i* * :"*. .                        :
Support Operations/Facihtlies *                    .                                                      ...                    :
Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                                    6al 31
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment          6b]
and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                      6c I Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals                6dl 32
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                                      Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 11/14)
CIO "a    -5    0                          -E DATE: 2012-04-18                                                0          -0 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                                  -
* 0
* M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                                                  -
Demonstrated                                                                  .,                M-.* '
                                                                                                                ~) U .      0      U
:EmergencyOperations Management        .  ...                                            . .      .      .      ..    .      .    "
Mobilization                                                                        lal M M M M M M M M M M Facilities                                                                          lbl Direction and Control                                                                1cl Communications Equipment                                                            Id1 Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                        lel Protective Action Decision.Making                                              :.        4::.          .
Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                    2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                2b 1 Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs    2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure              2d]
Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase                2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation                .        .
Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                  3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public      3bl    M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and              3cl access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and              3c2    M M M M            M    M M M M            M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                        3dl Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                        3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                        3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                        3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions        3fl Field Measurementand Analysis ..
RESERVED                                                                            4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                          4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                          4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                    4bl Laboratory Operations                                                                4cl EmergencyNotification and Public Info.                                      .. .....
Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5al RESERVED                                                                            5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media                  5bl Support Operations/Facilities ...                                                              i*....                ...  .....    .
33


===2.3 Scenario===
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Summary The exercise scenario was developed to evaluate the response of the exercise participants to a radiological emergency.
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees                        6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment          6bI and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees                                                        6cI Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals                  6dl 34
The scenario is listed in Appendix:
Exercise Plan.11 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES


===3.1 Exercise===
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Evaluation and Results This section contains the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the April 17, 2012 and April 18, 2012 Ingestion Plume Exercise, conducted to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of State and local governments in the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station 10-Mile and 50-Mile Emergency Planning Zone.Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated on its demonstration of criteria contained in the exercise evaluation areas as outlined in the federal Register, Volume 67, No. 80 "FEMA -Radiological Emergency Preparedness:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                        Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 12/14) o DATE: 2012-04-18                                            "7            U          .o =
Exercise Evaluation Methodology" (April 25, 2002).Detailed information on the evaluation area criteria and the extent-of-play agreements for the drill are included as appendices to this report.3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation The matrix presented in the table on following pages presents the status of all exercise evaluation area criteria that were scheduled for demonstration during the drill by all participating jurisdictions and functional entities.
SITE: Seabrook Station, NH                                                                      E M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not                                      o    *          -.  .
Exercise criteria are listed by number, and the demonstration status of those criteria are indicated by the use of the following letters: M -Met (No Deficiency or ARCAs assessed and no unresolved ARCAs from prior exercise)
Demonstrated                                                      E. U          *    ' 4.
A -ARCAs assessed or unresolved ARCAs from previous exercises D -Deficiency assessed P -Plan Issues N -Not Demonstrated 12 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 -Summary of Exercise Evaluation (14 pages)DATE: 2012-04-18 0 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH ." M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated C L n V Ln Emergency OperationsManagement
: 0. OjU      2 Emergenc OperatioinsManagement".:
..
Mobilization                                                                        lal  M M M M M M M M M M Facilities                                                                          1bi Direction and Control                                                                Ic1 Communications Equipment                                                            I dl Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations                                        l ei Protective, Action Decision Making Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                                    2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event                                2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs    2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure              2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase                2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation ..
Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control                                  3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public      3bl  M  M M M M M      IM M M      M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and              3cl              M access/functional needs                                                                                        I Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and              3c2  M  M M M    M  M M M        M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                        3d 1 Implementation of Traffic and Access Control                                        3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                        3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions                                        3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation. Reentry, and Return Decisions        3fl Field Measurement and:A alysis                                          .....                .  .
RESERVED                                                                            4a I Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                          4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses                                          4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling                                    4bl Laboratory Operations                                                                4c]
Emergency Notification arn:Public Info .          '
Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5al RESERVED                                                                            5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System                              5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654 H.7, H. 10, and Maine Radiation Control Program Procedure 2.11 dated 12/2011, Revision 12.
EFFECT: Environmental sampling teams do not need a beta gamma survey instrument capability. A gamma survey instrument is sufficient. Hence, for the extent of play in this exercise there is no effect from the procedure non-compliance.
However, if the intent is for the Maine Field Monitoring Team to be equipped to also perform plume tracking then, they need to have a beta gamma survey instrument to perform open and closed window readings. Without this capability the team cannot determine when they are in the plume.
RECOMMENDATION: The Radiation Control Program should update Procedure 2.11 to address the change to the survey equipment for the environmental sampling program. Also, if it is intended that "theFMT perform plume tracking then a beta gamma survey instrument should be included in the kit.
57


NUREG-0654 H.7, H. 10, and Maine Radiation Control Program Procedure 2.11 dated 12/2011, Revision 12.EFFECT: Environmental sampling teams do not need a beta gamma survey instrument capability.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
A gamma survey instrument is sufficient.
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
Hence, for the extent of play in this exercise there is no effect from the procedure non-compliance.
CONDITION: Prior Issue 57-06-3al -A-08 was closed and replaced by this planning issue. The original performance issue stated that Members of the Maine Sampling Team from the Department of Health and Human Services wore the permanent record dosimeters (PRDs) they routinely wear, but no PRDs were included in the dosimetry provided with the sampling equipment and supplies or issued to DOA team members prior to their deployment from the State Emergency Operation Center.
However, if the intent is for the Maine Field Monitoring Team to be equipped to also perform plume tracking then, they need to have a beta gamma survey instrument to perform open and closed window readings.
The Maine Emergency Management Agency has proposed that the non Radiation Control Program members of the Field Monitoring Team go to the York County EOC and obtain an emergency worker dosimetry packet. York County maintains a stockpile of PRD that they get from the State of New Hampshire.
Without this capability the team cannot determine when they are in the plume.RECOMMENDATION:
POSSIBLE CAUSE: Permanent record dosimeters for field sampling team members were not included with the sampling equipment and dosimetry. The equipment inventory list in Procedure 2.11, Revision 11 (Attachment 1) lists the quantities of TLDs as "as needed" and notes that dosimetry is stored separately. The person assembling or inventorying the sampling equipment kit may have believed that all members already sampling team members already had PRDs.
The Radiation Control Program should update Procedure 2.11 to address the change to the survey equipment for the environmental sampling program. Also, if it is intended that "the FMT perform plume tracking then a beta gamma survey instrument should be included in the kit.57 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION:
The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures.
Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
CONDITION:
Prior Issue 57-06-3al -A-08 was closed and replaced by this planning issue. The original performance issue stated that Members of the Maine Sampling Team from the Department of Health and Human Services wore the permanent record dosimeters (PRDs) they routinely wear, but no PRDs were included in the dosimetry provided with the sampling equipment and supplies or issued to DOA team members prior to their deployment from the State Emergency Operation Center.The Maine Emergency Management Agency has proposed that the non Radiation Control Program members of the Field Monitoring Team go to the York County EOC and obtain an emergency worker dosimetry packet. York County maintains a stockpile of PRD that they get from the State of New Hampshire.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: Permanent record dosimeters for field sampling team members were not included with the sampling equipment and dosimetry.
The equipment inventory list in Procedure 2.11, Revision 11 (Attachment  
: 1) lists the quantities of TLDs as "as needed" and notes that dosimetry is stored separately.
The person assembling or inventorying the sampling equipment kit may have believed that all members already sampling team members already had PRDs.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654, K.3.a EFFECT: Since the direct reading dosimeters (DRDs) are less accurate than PRDs, and reading exposures below about 100 milliroentgens is difficult using a 0-5 58


NUREG-0654, K.3.a EFFECT: Since the direct reading dosimeters (DRDs) are less accurate than PRDs, and reading exposures below about 100 milliroentgens is difficult using a 0-5 58 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station roentgen (R), members of the field team without PRDs would have a less accurate and incomplete record of their exposure.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
The DRDs is not an official record of exposure.RECOMMENDATION:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                     Seabrook Station roentgen (R), members of the field team without PRDs would have a less accurate and incomplete record of their exposure. The DRDs is not an official record of exposure.
This solution (all non RCP members of the FMT go to York County EOC to obtain dosimetry) needs to be documented in the plan and procedures so that all State Agencies and York County are aware of it.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
RECOMMENDATION: This solution (all non RCP members of the FMT go to York County EOC to obtain dosimetry) needs to be documented in the plan and procedures so that all State Agencies and York County are aware of it.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
3.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-06-3al-A-08 ISSUE: Members of the Maine Sampling Team from the Department of Health and Human Services wore the permanent record dosimeters (PRDs) they routinely wear, but no PRDs were included in the dosimetry provided with the sampling equipment and supplies or issued to DOA team members prior to their deployment from the State Emergency Operation Center.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 3.a.1.
The Maine Emergency Management Agency proposed that the non Radiation Control Program members of the Field Monitoring Team go to the York County EOC and obtain an emergency worker dosimetry packet. York County maintains a stockpile of PRD that they get from the State of New Hampshire.
ISSUE NO.: 57-06-3al-A-08 ISSUE: Members of the Maine Sampling Team from the Department of Health and Human Services wore the permanent record dosimeters (PRDs) they routinely wear, but no PRDs were included in the dosimetry provided with the sampling equipment and supplies or issued to DOA team members prior to their deployment from the State Emergency Operation Center.
This solution needs to be documented in the plan and procedures so that all State Agencies and York County are aware of it. A new planning issue will be issued and this performance issue will be closed.g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Maine Emergency Management Agency proposed that the non Radiation Control Program members of the Field Monitoring Team go to the York County EOC and obtain an emergency worker dosimetry packet. York County maintains a stockpile of PRD that they get from the State of New Hampshire. This solution needs to be documented in the plan and procedures so that all State Agencies and York County are aware of it. A new planning issue will be issued and this performance issue will be closed.
None 3.3.4.6 ME State Health and Environmental Testing Laboratory In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.e.1,3.a.1,4.c.1.
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.4.6 ME State Health and Environmental Testing Laboratory In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 1.e.1,3.a.1,4.c.1.
None 59 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station d.e.f.PLAN ISSUES: None NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None 59
3.a.1, 4.c.1.ISSUE NO.: ISSUE: (Not found in the database!)
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 3.a.1, 4.c.1.
ISSUE NO.:
ISSUE: (Not found in the database!)
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
ISSUE NO.: 57-00-3al-A-44 ISSUE: CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
ISSUE NO.: 57-00-3al-A-44 ISSUE:
The Maine HETL corrected their past issue 57-00-3al-A-44 of contamination control of the counter room detectors by covering with clear plastic the inside of the lead caves and over the detector heads.ISSUE NO.: 57-00-4cl-A-42 ISSUE: CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Maine HETL corrected their past issue 57-00-3al-A-44 of contamination control of the counter room detectors by covering with clear plastic the inside of the lead caves and over the detector heads.
The Maine HETL corrected their past issue 57-00-4cl-A-42 of insufficient leak testing of the Direct Reading Dosimeters used at the HETL. The HETL now uses MGP Instrument DMC 2000S Personal Electronic Dosimeter, calibrated April 9, 2012, for dosimetry alarming and direct readings.g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
ISSUE NO.: 57-00-4cl-A-42 ISSUE:
None 60 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.5 Risk Jurisdictions 3.3.5.1 ME York County EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.d.1, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Maine HETL corrected their past issue 57-00-4cl-A-42 of insufficient leak testing of the Direct Reading Dosimeters used at the HETL. The HETL now uses MGP Instrument DMC 2000S Personal Electronic Dosimeter, calibrated April 9, 2012, for dosimetry alarming and direct readings.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 60
3.d.2.f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
 
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None 3.3.6 New Hampshire Jurisdictions 3.3.6.1 NH State Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b. 1, 2.b.2, 2.c. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 5.a. 1, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.5 Risk Jurisdictions 3.3.5.1 ME York County EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.d.1, 5.b.1.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
l.c.l.ISSUE NO.: 67-11-1cl-P-01 ISSUE: Some municipalities experienced problems interpreting the content of the emergency status portrayed on 301B Forms sent from the NH State EOC.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
REDEMONSTRATION:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
The State of New Hampshire successfully redemonstrated the issuance of a properly executed 300B form with appropriate precautionary action, duly reviewed and approved on July 14, 2010, in the New Hampshire State EOC.61 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: 3.d.2.
None 3.3.6.2 NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.b.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 4.a.2.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-4a2-A-CRITERION:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
Field teams (two or more) are managed to obtain sufficient information to help characterize the release and to control radiation exposure.CONDITION:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6 New Hampshire Jurisdictions 3.3.6.1 NH State Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
The New Hampshire Field Monitoring Team 1 (FMT 1) did not receive sufficient direction to support characterization of the release. FMT1 never received direction to find the leading edge of the plume. The sample locations of 3.2, 3.7 and 3.8 provided by the Monitoring Team Coordinator (MTC) to the FMT 1 Team Lead never allowed FMT 1 to encounter any reading above background.
: a. M ET: 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b. 1, 2.b.2, 2.c. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 5.a. 1, 5.b. 1.
Both air samples taken by FMT 1 were taken in background areas.POSSIBLE CAUSE: The MTC received conflicting information from the Accident Assessment team at the State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC). The MTC followed the direction for the Accident Assessment team to keep FMT 1 out of the plume.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: l.c.l.
ISSUE NO.: 67-11-1cl-P-01 ISSUE: Some municipalities experienced problems interpreting the content of the emergency status portrayed on 301B Forms sent from the NH State EOC.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: REDEMONSTRATION: The State of New Hampshire successfully redemonstrated the issuance of a properly executed 300B form with appropriate precautionary action, duly reviewed and approved on July 14, 2010, in the New Hampshire State EOC.
61
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.2 NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.b.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 4.a.2.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-4a2-A-CRITERION: Field teams (two or more) are managed to obtain sufficient information to help characterize the release and to control radiation exposure.
CONDITION: The New Hampshire Field Monitoring Team 1(FMT 1) did not receive sufficient direction to support characterization of the release. FMT1 never received direction to find the leading edge of the plume. The sample locations of 3.2, 3.7 and 3.8 provided by the Monitoring Team Coordinator (MTC) to the FMT 1 Team Lead never allowed FMT1 to encounter any reading above background. Both air samples taken by FMT 1 were taken in background areas.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: The MTC received conflicting information from the Accident Assessment team at the State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC). The MTC followed the direction for the Accident Assessment team to keep FMT 1 out of the plume.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
REP Program Manual Pg 11-64 Section f. FMTs will obtain plume-edge measurements. NUREG CRITERION 1.8 Each organization, where appropriate, shall provide methods, equipment, and expertise to make rapid assessments of the actual or potential magnitude and locations of any radiological hazards through liquid or gaseous release pathways. This shall include activation, notification means, field team composition, transportation, communication, monitoring equipment, and estimated deployment times.
EFFECT: Due to the lack of data results above background FMT 1, the MTC did not successfully demonstrate the ability to characterize of the plume edges.
62


REP Program Manual Pg 11-64 Section f. FMTs will obtain plume-edge measurements.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
NUREG CRITERION 1.8 Each organization, where appropriate, shall provide methods, equipment, and expertise to make rapid assessments of the actual or potential magnitude and locations of any radiological hazards through liquid or gaseous release pathways.
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station RECOMMENDATION: The Accident Assessment team and MTC should coordinate.
This shall include activation, notification means, field team composition, transportation, communication, monitoring equipment, and estimated deployment times.EFFECT: Due to the lack of data results above background FMT 1, the MTC did not successfully demonstrate the ability to characterize of the plume edges.62 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station RECOMMENDATION:
more effectively to direct both FMTs to identify the leading edges of the plume. The plans and procedures should reflect the need to identify the leading edges of the plume. Identify in the plans and procedures what actually constitutes the leading edges of a plume. For example when FMTs identify dose rates 10 times background this will be considered the leading edge of the plume.
The Accident Assessment team and MTC should coordinate.
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
more effectively to direct both FMTs to identify the leading edges of the plume. The plans and procedures should reflect the need to identify the leading edges of the plume. Identify in the plans and procedures what actually constitutes the leading edges of a plume. For example when FMTs identify dose rates 10 times background this will be considered the leading edge of the plume.c. DEFICIENCY:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.3 NH State Police Communications Center, NH State Warning Point In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.6.3 NH State Police Communications Center, NH State Warning Point In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, l.d.1, 1.e.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, l.d.1, 1.e.1.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.6.4 Rockingham County Dispatch Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: 1.a. 1, l.b. 1, l.c. 1, l.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.d.2, 5.a. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.4 Rockingham County Dispatch Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: a. M ET: 1.a. 1, l.b. 1, l.c. 1, l.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.d.2, 5.a. 1.
None 63 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.6.5 NH (SS) Joint Information Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None 3.3.6.6 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1,4.a.3.
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 63
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
 
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
4.a. 1.ISSUE NO.: 57-10-4al-P-02 ISSUE: The NH Monitoring Teams' procedures in Section 2 address Instrument Checks for 5 survey instruments, 3 of which were used during the exercise.
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station 3.3.6.5 NH (SS) Joint Information Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
The instruments used were the Eberline 140, the CDV 718A and the RO-2. The other instruments were the RM-14, the PIC 6 and the CDV 700. The procedure for the instruments has the following statement: "verify that the meter responds to a Cs-137 check source". This statement does not satisfy the source check requirement of REP 14 that there be "a procedure for checking the performance of all monitoring instruments against an appropriate reading or range of readings for an identified check source." Since the CFD 2, the NH Monitoring Teams have implemented a verbal procedure for source checking the instruments, which was demonstrated.
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
However, due to the lack of a written procedure, the operator had difficulty performing the verbal procedure.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
The check source used in the verbal procedure was an 8 microcurie Cs-137 source in a plastic dish. Each instrument had a sticky note 64 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station attached with an expected reading. However, the operator did not know whether to measure the source with the cover on or off, and whether to have the source in contact with the detector.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.6.7 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.a. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.6 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
4.a.3.ISSUE NO.: 57-10-4a3-P-03 ISSUE: Current field team procedures do not require teams to perform radiation surveys during air sampling to ensure that the plume has not shifted during air sampling.
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1,4.a.3.
During the practice drills it was recommended that the field team procedure (Chapter 4, section 4.4) should be revised to require teams to conduct radiation surveys before, during and at the end of the air sampling period. During the exercise it was observed that the teams did implement the recommendation, but that the procedures were not changed to reflect the new survey procedure.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 4.a. 1.
ISSUE NO.: 57-10-4al-P-02 ISSUE: The NH Monitoring Teams' procedures in Section 2 address Instrument Checks for 5 survey instruments, 3 of which were used during the exercise. The instruments used were the Eberline 140, the CDV 718A and the RO-2. The other instruments were the RM-14, the PIC 6 and the CDV 700. The procedure for the instruments has the following statement: "verify that the meter responds to a Cs-137 check source". This statement does not satisfy the source check requirement of REP 14 that there be "a procedure for checking the performance of all monitoring instruments against an appropriate reading or range of readings for an identified check source." Since the CFD 2, the NH Monitoring Teams have implemented a verbal procedure for source checking the instruments, which was demonstrated.
However, due to the lack of a written procedure, the operator had difficulty performing the verbal procedure. The check source used in the verbal procedure was an 8 microcurie Cs-137 source in a plastic dish. Each instrument had a sticky note 64
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station attached with an expected reading. However, the operator did not know whether to measure the source with the cover on or off, and whether to have the source in contact with the detector.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.7 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 65 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.6.8 MA (SS) Emergency Operations Facility In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.b.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 4.a.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: L.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.a. 1.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.6.9 NH State Emergency Operations Center Day 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 2.a.1, 2.d.1, 2.e.1, 3.d.1, 3.e.1, 3.e.2, 3.f.1, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 4.a.3.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
ISSUE NO.: 57-10-4a3-P-03 ISSUE: Current field team procedures do not require teams to perform radiation surveys during air sampling to ensure that the plume has not shifted during air sampling. During the practice drills it was recommended that the field team procedure (Chapter 4, section 4.4) should be revised to require teams to conduct radiation surveys before, during and at the end of the air sampling period. During the exercise it was observed that the teams did implement the recommendation, but that the procedures were not changed to reflect the new survey procedure.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
None 3.3.6.10 NH -Field Sampling Team -1 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 65
None d. PLAN ISSUES: 3.a.l.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION:
 
The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or 66 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                     Seabrook Station 3.3.6.8 MA (SS) Emergency Operations Facility In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
CONDITION:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.b.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 4.a.2.
CONDITION (describe the inadequacy):
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
Field Sampling Team members were not aware that after the release has been terminated and entry into the intermediate phase, the dose limit reverts from the EPA-400 limits to those of Occupation Radiation Workers which is 5 REM TEDE.They were also not aware that any exposure accumulated during the emergency phase is not included in the intermediate exposure received.POSSIBLE CAUSE: POSSIBLE CAUSE (what is responsible):
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
Plan does not contain the change of the dose limits, nor the exposures received not being additive  
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.9 NH State Emergency Operations Center Day 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 2.a.1, 2.d.1, 2.e.1, 3.d.1, 3.e.1, 3.e.2, 3.f.1, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.10 NH - Field Sampling Team - 1 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.b. 1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: 3.a.l.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or 66
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
CONDITION: CONDITION (describe the inadequacy):
Field Sampling Team members were not aware that after the release has been terminated and entry into the intermediate phase, the dose limit reverts from the EPA-400 limits to those of Occupation Radiation Workers which is 5 REM TEDE.
They were also not aware that any exposure accumulated during the emergency phase is not included in the intermediate exposure received.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: POSSIBLE CAUSE (what is responsible):
Plan does not contain the change of the dose limits, nor the exposures received not being additive


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654, K.3.a, b EFFECT: The potential exists for Emergency Workers to exceed the allowable exposure limit for the intermediate phase.
RECOMMENDATION: Update the DPHS plan to state the change in the dose limit for Emergency Workers and include the emergency phase exposure is not included in the intermediate phase exposure received.
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.11 NH - Field Sampling Team - 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.b. 1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None 67


NUREG-0654, K.3.a, b EFFECT: The potential exists for Emergency Workers to exceed the allowable exposure limit for the intermediate phase.RECOMMENDATION:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Update the DPHS plan to state the change in the dose limit for Emergency Workers and include the emergency phase exposure is not included in the intermediate phase exposure received.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.12 NH State Laboratory - Day 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.6.11 NH -Field Sampling Team -2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 3.a.1, 4.c.1.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None 67 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: L.e.1.
None 3.3.6.12 NH State Laboratory  
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-lel-P-CRITERION: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, KI, and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations.
-Day 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 3.a.1, 4.c.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
CONDITION: Prior to instrument use, no operational checks were performed that used a known source and required an instrument response to be within a prescribed range. Also, there was no label affixed to the instrument that defined an acceptable range for the instrument response to a specific source. This was the situation for each of the seven survey instruments used by Radiochemistry Unit.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: L.e.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-lel-P-CRITERION:
POSSIBLE CAUSE: The State of New Hampshire Laboratory procedures do not require an operational check using a known source nor a label affixed to the instrument that specifies that the instrument response must fall within the defined range.
Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, KI, and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations.
CONDITION:
Prior to instrument use, no operational checks were performed that used a known source and required an instrument response to be within a prescribed range. Also, there was no label affixed to the instrument that defined an acceptable range for the instrument response to a specific source. This was the situation for each of the seven survey instruments used by Radiochemistry Unit.POSSIBLE CAUSE: The State of New Hampshire Laboratory procedures do not require an operational check using a known source nor a label affixed to the instrument that specifies that the instrument response must fall within the defined range.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
H. 10 EFFECT: No assurance that the instrument is operating properly RECOMMENDATION: Modify State procedures to require an operational check for laboratory instrumentation prior to use using a known source and a label affixed to the instrument that defines that the instrument response must fall within a specific range.
68


H. 10 EFFECT: No assurance that the instrument is operating properly RECOMMENDATION:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Modify State procedures to require an operational check for laboratory instrumentation prior to use using a known source and a label affixed to the instrument that defines that the instrument response must fall within a specific range.68 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                     Seabrook Station
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 3.3.6.13 NH State EOC Local Liaison In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.c.1, 1.d.1,2.c.1.
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.13 NH State EOC Local Liaison In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 1.c.1, 1.d.1,2.c.1.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.6.14 Rochester Reception Center Dosimetry Issue and Briefing, Emergency Worker Dosimeter In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 3.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.14 Rochester Reception Center Dosimetry Issue and Briefing, Emergency Worker Dosimeter In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: a. MET: 3.a.1.
None 3.3.7 Risk Jurisdictions
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
.3.3.7.1 Brentwood Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a. 1, l.b. 1, l.c. 1, l.d. 1, L.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None 69 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station d. PLAN ISSUES: 3.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures.
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
CONDITION:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7 Risk Jurisdictions
During the conduct of the Seabrook Station (SS) Exercise on April 17, 2012, the Brentwood New Hamphire Emergency Operations Center (EOC) assigned a Radiological Defense (RADEF) Officer who had never been in the position before.The RADEF Officer did not understand his role in providing a briefing on dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI)to emergency workers before dispatching them to the field.He issued the dosimetry and KI without a briefing.POSSIBLE CAUSE: The Radiological Defense (RADEF) Officer lacked the training needed to function in the role of the RADEF Officer.
.3.3.7.1 Brentwood Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: L.a. 1, l.b. 1, l.c. 1, l.d. 1, L.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None 69
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                           Seabrook Station
: d. PLAN ISSUES: 3.a.1.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
CONDITION: During the conduct of the Seabrook Station (SS) Exercise on April 17, 2012, the Brentwood New Hamphire Emergency Operations Center (EOC) assigned a Radiological Defense (RADEF) Officer who had never been in the position before.
The RADEF Officer did not understand his role in providing a briefing on dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI)to emergency workers before dispatching them to the field.
He issued the dosimetry and KI without a briefing.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: The Radiological Defense (RADEF) Officer lacked the training needed to function in the role of the RADEF Officer.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP 1; Part 0 Radiological Emergency Response Training EFFECT: 1. Emergency Workers could have received unnecessary exposure as a result of a lack of understanding of administrative control levels/turn back dose.
: 2. Emergency Workers did not understand the health effects of potassium iodide (KI)if allergic, or possibly ingesting the pill without the need to ingest it.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The State of NH Controller in the Brentwood NH Emergency Operations Center (EOC) instructed the RADEF Officer on how to conduct a proper briefing of emergency workers prior to dispatching them to the field.
70


NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP 1; Part 0 Radiological Emergency Response Training EFFECT: 1. Emergency Workers could have received unnecessary exposure as a result of a lack of understanding of administrative control levels/turn back dose.2. Emergency Workers did not understand the health effects of potassium iodide (KI)if allergic, or possibly ingesting the pill without the need to ingest it.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
The State of NH Controller in the Brentwood NH Emergency Operations Center (EOC) instructed the RADEF Officer on how to conduct a proper briefing of emergency workers prior to dispatching them to the field.70 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station The RADEF Officer gave a second briefing to emergency workers and the Evaluator asked questions of two emergency workers (per the extent of play agreement).
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                    Seabrook Station The RADEF Officer gave a second briefing to emergency workers and the Evaluator asked questions of two emergency workers (per the extent of play agreement). The briefing was given satisfactorily and both emergency workers correctly responded to a series of questions on the briefing.
The briefing was given satisfactorily and both emergency workers correctly responded to a series of questions on the briefing.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.2 East Kingston Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.7.2 East Kingston Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.7.3 Exeter Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.3 Exeter Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
None 71 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.4 Greenland Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None 3.3.7.5 Hampton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: l.a.l, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 71
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
 
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None 3.3.7.6 Hampton Falls Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                             Seabrook Station 3.3.7.4 Greenland Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: a. MET: L.a. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None 72 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.7 Kensington Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, l.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.5 Hampton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.7.8 Kingston NH Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 3.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-CRITERION:
: a. MET: l.a.l, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
CONDITION:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) failed to provide an adequate first dosimetry briefing to emergency workers.At 1130, during the Site Area Emergency (SAE) Emergency Classification Level (ECL) the RADEF Officer performed an Emergency Worker (EW) dosimetry briefing for three ambulance workers at the Kingston EOC. After this briefing, two of the EW were interviewed to determine their basic knowledge of radiation exposure limits, as specified, their knowledge of procedures to monitor and record dosimetry readings, and their ability to manage their radiological exposure.
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
During this interview the EW were not able to correctly identify their first reporting level of 175 73 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station mR, or the subsequent levels to be reported to their supervisor.
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
Using the supplied Emergency Worker Information sheet from the New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Vol.8/Rev.
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.6 Hampton Falls Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
14 both EW stated that they would report if one of their Direct-Reading Dosimeters (DRDs) were to go off scale. The EWs were issued two DRDs, one 0-200 mR and one 0-20 R.POSSIBLE CAUSE: The briefing provided by the RADEF Officer consisted of his reading from the Emergency Worker Information sheet, New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Vol.8/Rev.
: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
14, 10.8-1 to 10.8-6. It was determined by interview that the RADEF Officer was not specifically trained in this EOC staff position, but was assigned it on his arrival at the EOC. He therefore relied solely on the Emergency Worker Information sheet which was laid out in a way that confused both the RADEF Officer and the EWs as to administrative and turn-back limits.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 72
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                           Seabrook Station 3.3.7.7 Kensington Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, l.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.8 Kingston NH Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 3.a.1.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
CONDITION: The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) failed to provide an adequate first dosimetry briefing to emergency workers.
At 1130, during the Site Area Emergency (SAE) Emergency Classification Level (ECL) the RADEF Officer performed an Emergency Worker (EW) dosimetry briefing for three ambulance workers at the Kingston EOC. After this briefing, two of the EW were interviewed to determine their basic knowledge of radiation exposure limits, as specified, their knowledge of procedures to monitor and record dosimetry readings, and their ability to manage their radiological exposure. During this interview the EW were not able to correctly identify their first reporting level of 175 73
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station mR, or the subsequent levels to be reported to their supervisor. Using the supplied Emergency Worker Information sheet from the New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Vol.8/Rev. 14 both EW stated that they would report if one of their Direct-Reading Dosimeters (DRDs) were to go off scale. The EWs were issued two DRDs, one 0-200 mR and one 0-20 R.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: The briefing provided by the RADEF Officer consisted of his reading from the Emergency Worker Information sheet, New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Vol.8/Rev. 14, 10.8-1 to 10.8-6. It was determined by interview that the RADEF Officer was not specifically trained in this EOC staff position, but was assigned it on his arrival at the EOC. He therefore relied solely on the Emergency Worker Information sheet which was laid out in a way that confused both the RADEF Officer and the EWs as to administrative and turn-back limits.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 J.10.e; K3.a,b; K.4 New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Volume 8, Section 10.8 Kingston Implementing Procedures, Section 3.11 EFFECT: The EW could potentially receive a higher radiation dose than allowed under EPA-400-R-92-001 and New Hampshire Plans and Procedures.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The RADEF Officer received supplemental training from the New Hampshire representative at the EOC and satisfactorily performed a second EW briefing. At 1340, after exercise termination, three EW were interviewed (including one EW from the first briefing/interview) who all demonstrated an adequate knowledge of radiation exposure limits as specified in New Hampshire plans and procedures, their knowledge of procedures to monitor and record dosimetry readings, and their ability to manage their radiological exposure.
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: 3.a.1.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and 74


NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 J.10.e; K3.a,b; K.4 New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Volume 8, Section 10.8 Kingston Implementing Procedures, Section 3.11 EFFECT: The EW could potentially receive a higher radiation dose than allowed under EPA-400-R-92-001 and New Hampshire Plans and Procedures.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                             Seabrook Station manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
The RADEF Officer received supplemental training from the New Hampshire representative at the EOC and satisfactorily performed a second EW briefing.
CONDITION: The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) failed to supply potassium iodide (KI) tablets with a briefing to the entire facility staff as per Kingston Plans and Procedures.
At 1340, after exercise termination, three EW were interviewed (including one EW from the first briefing/interview) who all demonstrated an adequate knowledge of radiation exposure limits as specified in New Hampshire plans and procedures, their knowledge of procedures to monitor and record dosimetry readings, and their ability to manage their radiological exposure.c. DEFICIENCY:
POSSIBLE CAUSE: At 1201, Kingston's Emergency Management Director (EMD) confirmed that the State of New Hampshire recommended that all EW take KI within the Emergency Planning Zone. This was relayed to the RADEF Officer who occupies an adjacent room within the facility. The RADEF Officer and his assistants distributed four KI tablets to EOC staff per their plans and procedures. At 1241, the RADEF Officer conducted a KI briefing in the EOC proper and staff was directed to simulate taking one KI tablet.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: 3.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION:
The EOC is located on the second floor of the Kingston Fire Station. Along with the EOC room, a radio room (with three staff) and EOC Security at the stairs (with two staff) are also located in the facility. After issuance of KI to staff at 1241, again at 1319, and at the end of the exercise at 1339 it was determined by interview that the radio room and security staff had not received KI tablets or been briefed on KI use.
The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and 74 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures.
Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
CONDITION:
The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) failed to supply potassium iodide (KI) tablets with a briefing to the entire facility staff as per Kingston Plans and Procedures.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: At 1201, Kingston's Emergency Management Director (EMD)confirmed that the State of New Hampshire recommended that all EW take KI within the Emergency Planning Zone. This was relayed to the RADEF Officer who occupies an adjacent room within the facility.
The RADEF Officer and his assistants distributed four KI tablets to EOC staff per their plans and procedures.
At 1241, the RADEF Officer conducted a KI briefing in the EOC proper and staff was directed to simulate taking one KI tablet.The EOC is located on the second floor of the Kingston Fire Station. Along with the EOC room, a radio room (with three staff) and EOC Security at the stairs (with two staff) are also located in the facility.
After issuance of KI to staff at 1241, again at 1319, and at the end of the exercise at 1339 it was determined by interview that the radio room and security staff had not received KI tablets or been briefed on KI use.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 J.10.e; K3.a,b; K.4 New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Volume 8, Section 10.8 Kingston Implementing Procedures, Section 3.11 EFFECT: Facility staff not issued KI would be at greater risk of absorbing radiation in their thyroid.
RECOMMENDATION: Procedures should be implemented that require the RADEF Officer and/or the EMD to compare the security sign-in sheet and the Emergency Worker Potassium Iodide User Agreement Form 135A, Volume 8/Rev. 14, to ensure that all facility staff receives KI.
75


NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 J.10.e; K3.a,b; K.4 New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Volume 8, Section 10.8 Kingston Implementing Procedures, Section 3.11 EFFECT: Facility staff not issued KI would be at greater risk of absorbing radiation in their thyroid.RECOMMENDATION:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Procedures should be implemented that require the RADEF Officer and/or the EMD to compare the security sign-in sheet and the Emergency Worker Potassium Iodide User Agreement Form 135A, Volume 8/Rev. 14, to ensure that all facility staff receives KI.75 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                           Seabrook Station
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 3.3.7.9 New Castle Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, l.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.9 New Castle Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, l.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None 3.3.7.10 Newfields Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: l.a.1, 1.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 3.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-CRITERION:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures.
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
CONDITION:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.10 Newfields Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
The primary RADEF Officer in the Town of Newfields was unavailable and the alternate RADEF Officer substituted during the exercise.
: a. M ET: l.a.1, 1.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
The alternate RADEF Officer was not familiar with zeroing the dosimetry.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 3.a.1.
The Alternate RADEF Office did not brief the officer of the need to contact the officer's immediate supervisor when the 200mR reading was reached. The Alternate RADEF Officer did 76 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station not brief the side effects of Potassium Iodide during the breifing until prompted by another staff member. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not understand the meaning of the 5 R turn back value and did not emphasize the turn back value meaning to the officer.POSSIBLE CAUSE: The alternate RADEF Officer is not called upon to conduct the Radiological Briefing or zero the dosimeters on a regular basis. More Training in this position is required.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
CONDITION: The primary RADEF Officer in the Town of Newfields was unavailable and the alternate RADEF Officer substituted during the exercise. The alternate RADEF Officer was not familiar with zeroing the dosimetry. The Alternate RADEF Office did not brief the officer of the need to contact the officer's immediate supervisor when the 200mR reading was reached. The Alternate RADEF Officer did 76
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                             Seabrook Station not brief the side effects of Potassium Iodide during the breifing until prompted by another staff member. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not understand the meaning of the 5 R turn back value and did not emphasize the turn back value meaning to the officer.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: The alternate RADEF Officer is not called upon to conduct the Radiological Briefing or zero the dosimeters on a regular basis. More Training in this position is required.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
K.3.a, K.3.b EFFECT: The Emergency Workers dispatched from the Newfields Emergency Operations Center (NEOC) would not be assured that the readings from the Self Reading Dosimeters were accurate. They would not have a clear understanding of their exposure limits and Emergency Workers. If instructed to ingest KI the Emergency Workers would be unaware of possible side effects and allergic reactions.
If the Emergency workers were in a radiation plume they may have received a dose in excess of administrative limits of the ORO.
RECOMMENDATION: The alternate RADEF Officer should be trained annually and participate in all exercises.
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.11 Newton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None 77


K.3.a, K.3.b EFFECT: The Emergency Workers dispatched from the Newfields Emergency Operations Center (NEOC) would not be assured that the readings from the Self Reading Dosimeters were accurate.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
They would not have a clear understanding of their exposure limits and Emergency Workers. If instructed to ingest KI the Emergency Workers would be unaware of possible side effects and allergic reactions.
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                         Seabrook Station
If the Emergency workers were in a radiation plume they may have received a dose in excess of administrative limits of the ORO.RECOMMENDATION:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
The alternate RADEF Officer should be trained annually and participate in all exercises.
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.12 North Hampton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: a. MET: l.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None 3.3.7.11 Newton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None 77 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.13 Portsmouth Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.7.12 North Hampton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: l.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.b. 1, L.e. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 3.a.1.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
CONDITION: Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.
None 3.3.7.13 Portsmouth Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.b. 1, L.e. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 3.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-CRITERION:
The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gave inadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aid 78
The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures.
 
Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
CONDITION:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station conflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains all information needed for emergency worker exposure control. The Radiological Officer also skipped important information that emergency workers needed to be briefed on prior to being deployed to the field (the Radiological Officer did not read off the Briefing Form that the State had provided to all EOCs)- the Radiological Officer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOC when the dosimeter reaches IR. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer provided inaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers who may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at a nuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose occupation carries with it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declaration in writing if they are or think that they may be pregnant.
Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.
The Radiological Officer also had a Job Aid that conflicted with the Briefing Form that the State provided to the Emergency Operations Center.
The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gave inadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aid 78 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station conflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains all information needed for emergency worker exposure control. The Radiological Officer also skipped important information that emergency workers needed to be briefed on prior to being deployed to the field (the Radiological Officer did not read off the Briefing Form that the State had provided to all EOCs)- the Radiological Officer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOC when the dosimeter reaches IR. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer provided inaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers who may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at a nuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose occupation carries with it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declaration in writing if they are or think that they may be pregnant.The Radiological Officer also had a Job Aid that conflicted with the Briefing Form that the State provided to the Emergency Operations Center.The Radiological Officer was also using Rev 13 for Form 305A, which is out of date.Rev 14 Forms are the most up to date and and FEMA approved forms for emergency workers.The Emergency Operations Center also had the wrong inventory form for the emergency worker kits. The one provided was out of date.POSSIBLE CAUSE: The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing, and did not read directly from the briefing form provided by the State.The RERP for the City of Portsmouth does not require the RADEF Officer to brief the emergency workers. The RADEF Officer's procedure refers to the NHRERP Procedure for Issuing Dosimetry and KI, Volume 8, Section 10.7, which also does not require an emergency worker briefing.
The Radiological Officer was also using Rev 13 for Form 305A, which is out of date.
Rev 14 Forms are the most up to date and and FEMA approved forms for emergency workers.
The Emergency Operations Center also had the wrong inventory form for the emergency worker kits. The one provided was out of date.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing, and did not read directly from the briefing form provided by the State.
The RERP for the City of Portsmouth does not require the RADEF Officer to brief the emergency workers. The RADEF Officer's procedure refers to the NHRERP Procedure for Issuing Dosimetry and KI, Volume 8, Section 10.7, which also does not require an emergency worker briefing.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654 FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1 K.3.a, K.3.b Implementing Procedures for EPZ Communities Incident Annex Rev 13 Form 305 A 79
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                          Seabrook Station Radiological Officer Job Aid Radiological Briefing Form EFFECT: The emergency workers could have gone on missions without knowing the proper information for protecting themselves from radiation exposure.
RECOMMENDATION: This previous issue was not corrected.
Training needs to be provided to the Radiological Officer. Rev 13 Forms need to be destroyed. The Job Aid must align with the Incident Annex and Implementing Procedures, as well as the City's Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES- RESOLVED: 3.a.1.
ISSUE NO.: 57-10-3al-P-04 ISSUE: Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: This issue was not corrected. It was made into an ARCA.
The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gave inadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aid conflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains all information needed for emergency worker exposure control.
The Radiological Officer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOC when the dosimeter reaches 1R. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer provided inaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers who may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at a nuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose 80
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                    Seabrook Station occupation carries with it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declaration in writing if they are or think that they may be pregnant.
Furthermore, the Radiological Officer used Rev 13 for Form 305A, and not Rev 14, which is the FEMA approved form for use.
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.14 Rye Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.15 Seabrook Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, l.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1,3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.16 South Hampton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None 81


NUREG-0654 FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1 K.3.a, K.3.b Implementing Procedures for EPZ Communities Incident Annex Rev 13 Form 305 A 79 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Radiological Officer Job Aid Radiological Briefing Form EFFECT: The emergency workers could have gone on missions without knowing the proper information for protecting themselves from radiation exposure.RECOMMENDATION:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
This previous issue was not corrected.
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                         Seabrook Station
Training needs to be provided to the Radiological Officer. Rev 13 Forms need to be destroyed.
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
The Job Aid must align with the Incident Annex and Implementing Procedures, as well as the City's Radiological Emergency Response Plan.c. DEFICIENCY:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES- RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 3.b.1, 3.d.1.
3.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-10-3al-P-04 ISSUE: Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.
ISSUE NO.: 57-10-3b1-P-05 ISSUE: The current version of the Dosimetry-KI Report Form 305A (Rev 14) does not contain the correct number of days to record the ingestion of KI by emergency workers. Rev 14 of the form indicates 10 days for KI ingestion, although Volume 8 of the NH RERP, Dosimetry and KI issuance instructions call for only four days of ingestion. The older Rev 13 of Form 305A, which is still in circulation in some communities, includes the correct record of ingestion for four days.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
This issue was not corrected.
It was made into an ARCA.The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gave inadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aid conflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains all information needed for emergency worker exposure control.The Radiological Officer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOC when the dosimeter reaches 1R. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer provided inaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers who may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at a nuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose 80 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station occupation carries with it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declaration in writing if they are or think that they may be pregnant.Furthermore, the Radiological Officer used Rev 13 for Form 305A, and not Rev 14, which is the FEMA approved form for use.g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
None 3.3.7.14 Rye Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
None 3.3.7.15 Seabrook Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, l.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
None 3.3.7.16 South Hampton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None 81 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station c. DEFICIENCY:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
3.b.1, 3.d.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-10-3b1-P-05 ISSUE: The current version of the Dosimetry-KI Report Form 305A (Rev 14) does not contain the correct number of days to record the ingestion of KI by emergency workers. Rev 14 of the form indicates 10 days for KI ingestion, although Volume 8 of the NH RERP, Dosimetry and KI issuance instructions call for only four days of ingestion.
The older Rev 13 of Form 305A, which is still in circulation in some communities, includes the correct record of ingestion for four days.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
ISSUE NO.: 57-10-3dl-P-06 ISSUE: Issue: 57-10-3dl-?-
ISSUE NO.: 57-10-3dl-P-06 ISSUE: Issue: 57-10-3dl-?-
Planning Issue CONDITION:
Planning Issue CONDITION:
There are discrepancies in the NH Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP)as to proper delegation of primary organizational responsibility for implementing traffic control in South Hampton. Volume 41 of the NHRERP, NH Traffic Management Manual states that the State Police have primary responsibility for staffing Traffic Control Points (TCPs) in South Hampton and assigns State resources for this function.
There are discrepancies in the NH Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) as to proper delegation of primary organizational responsibility for implementing traffic control in South Hampton. Volume 41 of the NHRERP, NH Traffic Management Manual states that the State Police have primary responsibility for staffing Traffic Control Points (TCPs) in South Hampton and assigns State resources for this function. This was done because South Hampton has a part time Police Department and cannot ensure adequate resources will be available to staff TCPs during an emergency. However, Volume 36 of the NHRERP, Table 1.6-1 and the South Hampton Police Chief procedure assign traffic control as a local police responsibility, including a step for the local Police Chief to Dispatch his officers to the TCPs.
This was done because South Hampton has a part time Police Department and cannot ensure adequate resources will be available to staff TCPs during an emergency.
82
However, Volume 36 of the NHRERP, Table 1.6-1 and the South Hampton Police Chief procedure assign traffic control as a local police responsibility, including a step for the local Police Chief to Dispatch his officers to the TCPs.82 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
 
: g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None 3.3.7.17 Stratham Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                         Seabrook Station CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.17 Stratham Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
1.d. 1, i.e. 1.ISSUE NO.: 57-06-ldl-A-06 ISSUE: The Stratham EOC had only two active telephone lines for all incoming and out going calls. These two lines served the 22 people signed into the EOC who were making out going calls. It was discovered no calls could come into the EOC. As a fix one line was designated as an incoming line and one as an outgoing line. However, there were still individuals who tried to call in and, unknown to the EOC, were never able to get through to the EOC.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
This issue was originally cited in 2006, when the EOC was at a prior location by the Police Station and Library. It has since moved to a new building that also houses the Stratham Volunteer Fire Department.
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
It was mentioned that a request for a third line is in process. They did use six of the Stratham Volunteer Fire Department's commercial landlines.
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
It was mentioned they get billed separately for that. For this criterion, it states primary and back-up operational.
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
That was accomplished.
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 1.d. 1, i.e. 1.
Note: Additional line(s) would be good so as the primary line was not busy if a second call was coming in, for example by the State.83 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station ISSUE NO.: 57-10-1el-P-07 ISSUE: No provision has been provided in the plans and/or procedures to ensure that the control permanent record dosimeter (PRD) included with the PRDs is not exposed to radiation fields experienced by emergency workers in the emergency operations center (EOC) from a passing radioactive plume or deposition of radioactivity.
ISSUE NO.: 57-06-ldl-A-06 ISSUE: The Stratham EOC had only two active telephone lines for all incoming and out going calls. These two lines served the 22 people signed into the EOC who were making out going calls. It was discovered no calls could come into the EOC. As a fix one line was designated as an incoming line and one as an outgoing line. However, there were still individuals who tried to call in and, unknown to the EOC, were never able to get through to the EOC.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: This issue was originally cited in 2006, when the EOC was at a prior location by the Police Station and Library. It has since moved to a new building that also houses the Stratham Volunteer Fire Department.
The Stratham Radiological Officer used the correct survey meters (CD V-700s)Kit that was labled for the Stratham Emergency Operation Center, identified by "EOC Kit".The calibration date was current "2012".ISSUE NO.: 57-10-lel-A-08 ISSUE: Incorrect survey meters (CD V-700s) were used by the Town. The Town used their transportation accident monitoring kit rather than instruments that were issued to the Town specifically for REP. Calibration standards are different for CD V-700 instruments if they are used in a REP situation (annual calibration) versus every four years for transportation accident monitoring.
It was mentioned that a request for a third line is in process. They did use six of the Stratham Volunteer Fire Department's commercial landlines. It was mentioned they get billed separately for that. For this criterion, it states primary and back-up operational. That was accomplished.
Because the Town used the CD V-700s from the transportation accident monitoring kit in a REP situation, the instruments were not calibrated for use in 2010.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:
Note: Additional line(s) would be good so as the primary line was not busy if a second call was coming in, for example by the State.
The Permanent Record Dosimeters were protected and shielded according to the plan/procedures and the extent of play.g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
83
None 84 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.18 Adeline C. Marston School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
 
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station ISSUE NO.: 57-10-1el-P-07 ISSUE: No provision has been provided in the plans and/or procedures to ensure that the control permanent record dosimeter (PRD) included with the PRDs is not exposed to radiation fields experienced by emergency workers in the emergency operations center (EOC) from a passing radioactive plume or deposition of radioactivity.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Stratham Radiological Officer used the correct survey meters (CD V-700s)Kit that was labled for the Stratham Emergency Operation Center, identified by "EOC Kit".
None 3.3.7.19 Coorperative Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
The calibration date was current "2012".
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
ISSUE NO.: 57-10-lel-A-08 ISSUE: Incorrect survey meters (CD V-700s) were used by the Town. The Town used their transportation accident monitoring kit rather than instruments that were issued to the Town specifically for REP. Calibration standards are different for CD V-700 instruments if they are used in a REP situation (annual calibration) versus every four years for transportation accident monitoring. Because the Town used the CD V-700s from the transportation accident monitoring kit in a REP situation, the instruments were not calibrated for use in 2010.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Permanent Record Dosimeters were protected and shielded according to the plan/procedures and the extent of play.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 84
None 3.3.7.20 Heronfield Academy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: l.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
 
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.18 Adeline C. Marston School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None 85 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.21 Winnacunnet High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 3.3.7.22 Seabrook Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.19 Coorperative Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None 3.3.7.23 Lincoln Street Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.20 Heronfield Academy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 86 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.24 Swasey Central School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: l.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.7.25 Kensignton Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 85
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
 
None 3.3.7.26 Sanborn Region High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.21 Winnacunnet High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: a. MET: 1.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None 87 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.27 Memorial School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 3.3.7.28 Exeter High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.22 Seabrook Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None 3.3.7.29 Hampton Academy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.23 Lincoln Street Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 88 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.30 North Hampton School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.7.31 Greenland Central School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 86
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
 
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None 3.3.7.32 New Franklin School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.24 Swasey Central School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None 89 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.33 Lister Academy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.25 Kensignton Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.7.34 A Place to Grow In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.7.35 Rockingham County Nursing Home In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.l,3.b.1,3.c.1.
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.26 Sanborn Region High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None 90 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.36 Polka Dots Childeare Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 3.3.7.37 Appleseeds Day Care In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 87
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
 
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.27 Memorial School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.7.38 Donna Clarke Family Day Care In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 91 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.39 Stratham Circle Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.28 Exeter High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
None 3.3.7.40 Great Bay Kid's Company In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None 3.3.7.41 Newton Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.29 Hampton Academy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None 92 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.42 Over the Rainbow In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 3.3.7.43 My First School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 88
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
 
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.30 North Hampton School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.7.44 Imprints Day School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 93 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.45 Kids Stop Inc.In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.31 Greenland Central School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
None 3.3.7.46 Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Ctr In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.l.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 3.3.7.47 The Ridge at Riverwoods In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1,3.b.l,3.c.l.
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.32 New Franklin School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 94 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.48 DeColores Childrens Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 89
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
 
None 3.3.7.49 Clipper Habor of Portsmouth CRC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.1.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.33 Lister Academy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None 3.3.7.50 The Childrens Garden In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.34 A Place to Grow In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 95 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.51 Edgewood Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None 3.3.7.52 Edgewood Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.35 Rockingham County Nursing Home In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: a. MET: 1.a.l,3.b.1,3.c.1.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None 3.3.7.53 Kindercare Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 96 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.54 Kathleen Tostenson In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 90
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
 
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.36 Polka Dots Childeare Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.7.55 Pats Family Child Care In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.7.56 Live Y'ers In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.37 Appleseeds Day Care In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None 97 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8 Support Jurisdictions 3.3.8.1 Rochester Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a. 1, 1.c. 1, l.d. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None 3.3.8.2 Dover Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, L.b. 1, .c. 1, l.d. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.38 Donna Clarke Family Day Care In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None 3.3.8.3 Manchester Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: L.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 98 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8.4 Manchester MHS Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: 3.3.8.5 Rochester Reception Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.a. 1, l.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 91
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
 
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.39 Stratham Circle Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.8.6 Rochester Reception Center Vehicles In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 3.d.1, 6.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.8.7 Rochester Reception Center Registration In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 6.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.40 Great Bay Kid's Company In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 99 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None 3.3.8.8 Manchester HS Reception Center Operations In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: l.a.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.l.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None 3.3.8.9 Manchester Reception Center Dosimetry In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 3.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.41 Newton Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None 3.3.8.10 Manchester Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 3.d.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: 6.b.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6bl-P-CRITERION:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their 100 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station equipment and vehicles.CONDITION:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
There was conflicting guidance given to vehicle Monitoring Team at the Manchester, NH Reception Center on the morning of March 24, 2012. The team members were confused as to which guidance was to be used. Controller and team members consulted the evaluator as to what guidance to use. As the team was initially were conducting monitoring of a vehicle, two team members were employed at the same time and both were using different heights from monitored surface and different speeds in inches per second over the vehicle surface. As just in time training and correction in place the evaluator instructed the team to proceed with the most conservative of the three different standards.
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
POSSIBLE CAUSE: This evaluator was provided "April 2011, Radiological Emergency Response for Nuclear Facilities Attachment C, Implementing Procedures for Host Communities" on Table #2 the monitoring instructions for the Victoreen CDV-770-P "pancake probe" indicate "4 inches from the surface being monitored and a speed of 24 inches per second".The Vehicle Monitoring staff had tow documents "5.7 Staff- Vehicle Monitoring Rev. 1/1/2012" which stated hold probe"l inch from surface and the vehicle monitoring should take 90 seconds" with no mention of monitoring sweep speed in inches per second.The second document "Vehicle Monitoring 10-10 states to "hold the probe at 2 inches. Do not move fast!" and "monitoring of vehicle should not take less than 90 seconds".
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 92
Again no mention of probe speed in inches per second.
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.42 Over the Rainbow In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.43 My First School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.44 Imprints Day School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 93
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.45 Kids Stop Inc.
In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.46 Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Ctr In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: L.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.l.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.47 The Ridge at Riverwoods In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: L.a.1,3.b.l,3.c.l.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 94
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.48 DeColores Childrens Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.49 Clipper Habor of Portsmouth CRC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.50 The Childrens Garden In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 95
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.51 Edgewood Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.52 Edgewood Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.53 Kindercare Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 96
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.7.54 Kathleen Tostenson In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.55 Pats Family Child Care In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.56 Live Y'ers In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 97
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.8 Support Jurisdictions 3.3.8.1 Rochester Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: L.a. 1, 1.c. 1, l.d. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.2 Dover Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, L.b. 1, .c. 1, l.d. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.3 Manchester Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: L.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 98
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.8.4 Manchester MHS Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
3.3.8.5 Rochester Reception Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 1.a. 1, l.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.6 Rochester Reception Center Vehicles In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 3.d.1, 6.b.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.7 Rochester Reception Center Registration In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 6.a.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None 99
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.8 Manchester HS Reception Center Operations In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: l.a.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.l.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.9 Manchester Reception Center Dosimetry In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 3.a.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.10 Manchester Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 3.d.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: 6.b.1.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6bl-P-CRITERION: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their 100
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station equipment and vehicles.
CONDITION: There was conflicting guidance given to vehicle Monitoring Team at the Manchester, NH Reception Center on the morning of March 24, 2012. The team members were confused as to which guidance was to be used. Controller and team members consulted the evaluator as to what guidance to use. As the team was initially were conducting monitoring of a vehicle, two team members were employed at the same time and both were using different heights from monitored surface and different speeds in inches per second over the vehicle surface. As just in time training and correction in place the evaluator instructed the team to proceed with the most conservative of the three different standards.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: This evaluator was provided "April 2011, Radiological Emergency Response for Nuclear Facilities Attachment C, Implementing Procedures for Host Communities" on Table #2 the monitoring instructions for the Victoreen CDV-770-P "pancake probe" indicate "4 inches from the surface being monitored and a speed of 24 inches per second".
The Vehicle Monitoring staff had tow documents "5.7 Staff- Vehicle Monitoring Rev. 1/1/2012" which stated hold probe"l inch from surface and the vehicle monitoring should take 90 seconds" with no mention of monitoring sweep speed in inches per second.
The second document "Vehicle Monitoring 10-10 states to "hold the probe at 2 inches. Do not move fast!" and "monitoring of vehicle should not take less than 90 seconds". Again no mention of probe speed in inches per second.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
6.b. I Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency worker Equipment, NUREG K.5.b, REP 22.1, 22.3 EFFECT: Had this been an actual nuclear power plant accident, the vehicle monitors would have given inconsistent and inaccurate measurements of vehicles and could have possibly declared a contaminated vehicle to be clean.
RECOMMENDATION: Establish one standard set of guidance for Vehicle 101


6.b. I Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency worker Equipment, NUREG K.5.b, REP 22.1, 22.3 EFFECT: Had this been an actual nuclear power plant accident, the vehicle monitors would have given inconsistent and inaccurate measurements of vehicles and could have possibly declared a contaminated vehicle to be clean.RECOMMENDATION:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Establish one standard set of guidance for Vehicle 101 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring with a recommended distance of probe from of 1" from surface to be monitored and to move probe across surface to be monitored of 6" per second.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station Monitoring with a recommended distance of probe from of 1" from surface to be monitored and to move probe across surface to be monitored of 6" per second.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 3.3.8.11 Manchester Reception Center Female Mon/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 3.a.1, 6.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.11 Manchester Reception Center Female Mon/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: a. MET: 3.a.1, 6.a.1.
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None 3.3.8.12 Manchester Reception Center Registration In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 6.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.12 Manchester Reception Center Registration In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None 3.3.8.13 Manchester Reception Center Male Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 3.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. MET: 6.a.1.
None 102 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station d. PLAN ISSUES: 6.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6a1-P-CRITERION:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.CONDITION:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correctly.
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.13 Manchester Reception Center Male Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 3.a.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None 102
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station
: d. PLAN ISSUES: 6.a.1.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6a1-P-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.
CONDITION: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correctly.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: Lack of proper training and understanding of the procedure for determining proper meter operation.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: Lack of proper training and understanding of the procedure for determining proper meter operation.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 75 ITEMS 9 & 10 EFFECT: Using a meter not that is not operating properly may possibly provide incorrect readings for contamination.
NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 75 ITEMS 9 & 10 EFFECT: Using a meter not that is not operating properly may possibly provide incorrect readings for contamination.
RECOMMENDATION:
RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations
Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation.
Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations
: 9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
: 9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
: 10. DELETE 11. change 11 to 10 ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-P-CRITERION:
: 10. DELETE
The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.103 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station CONDITION:
: 11. change 11 to 10 ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-P-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.
Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area.POSSIBLE CAUSE: Lack of proper training and incorrect procedures for determining proper background reading for work area.
103
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                     Seabrook Station CONDITION: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: Lack of proper training and incorrect procedures for determining proper background reading for work area.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 76 ITEMS 4, 5, & 6 EFFECT: Not determining proper background could cause improper adjusted readings while surveying people and equipment.
RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.
: 4. Replace paragraph 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone. Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.
: 5. DELETE
: 6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 104
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                    Seabrook Station 3.3.8.14 Manchester Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 6.a.1, 6.b.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.15 Rochester Reception Center Portal and Secondary Monitoring In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 6.a.1, 6.b.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.16 Rochester Reception Center Male Monitoring/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 3.a.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 6.a.1.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-A-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.
CONDITION: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area 105


NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 76 ITEMS 4, 5, & 6 EFFECT: Not determining proper background could cause improper adjusted readings while surveying people and equipment.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
RECOMMENDATION:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                     Seabrook Station POSSIBLE CAUSE: : Lack of proper training and incorrect procedures for determining proper background reading for work area.
Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures.
Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.4. Replace paragraph
: 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone.
Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.5. DELETE 6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
None 104 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8.14 Manchester Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 6.a.1, 6.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
None 3.3.8.15 Rochester Reception Center Portal and Secondary Monitoring In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 6.a.1, 6.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
None 3.3.8.16 Rochester Reception Center Male Monitoring/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 3.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 6.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-A-CRITERION:
The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.CONDITION:
Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area 105 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station POSSIBLE CAUSE: : Lack of proper training and incorrect procedures for determining proper background reading for work area.


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 76 ITEMS 4, 5, & 6 EFFECT: Not determining proper background could cause improper adjusted readings while surveying people and equipment.
RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.
: 4. Replace paragraph 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone. Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.
: 5. Delete
: 6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.
ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-A-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.
CONDITION: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correct 106


NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 76 ITEMS 4, 5, & 6 EFFECT: Not determining proper background could cause improper adjusted readings while surveying people and equipment.
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
RECOMMENDATION:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station POSSIBLE CAUSE: : Lack of proper training and understanding of the procedure for determining proper meter operation
Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures.
Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.4. Replace paragraph
: 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone.
Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.5. Delete 6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-A-CRITERION:
The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.CONDITION:
Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correct 106 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station POSSIBLE CAUSE: : Lack of proper training and understanding of the procedure for determining proper meter operation  


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
: NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 75 ITEMS 9 & 10 EFFECT: Using a meter not operating properly possibly provides incorrect reading for contamination.
: NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 75 ITEMS 9 & 10 EFFECT: Using a meter not operating properly possibly provides incorrect reading for contamination.
RECOMMENDATION:  
RECOMMENDATION: : Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations
: Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation.
Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations
: 9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
: 9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
: 10. DELETE 11. change 11 to 10 ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-A-CRITERION:
: 10. DELETE
The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.CONDITION::
: 11. change 11 to 10 ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-A-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.
INADEQUATE SUPPLIES: Supply Issue: The Male Decontamination Team did not use the correct step off pads, they used a heavy paper pad labeled "Step Off Pad". They needed the multi page plastic step off pads. Reception center supply was checked and correct pads were not available.
CONDITION:: INADEQUATE SUPPLIES:
Supply Issue: Procedures call for maslin mops to mop walk ways to pick up contamination that may have dropped on the floor. The male monitoring and 107 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station decontamination team had mop heads and handles but did not have any maslin cloth.The Supply trailer was checked but no maslin cloth could be found.POSSIBLE CAUSE: Over-site not tracking required supplies in supply trailer  
Supply Issue: The Male Decontamination Team did not use the correct step off pads, they used a heavy paper pad labeled "Step Off Pad". They needed the multi page plastic step off pads. Reception center supply was checked and correct pads were not available.
Supply Issue: Procedures call for maslin mops to mop walk ways to pick up contamination that may have dropped on the floor. The male monitoring and 107
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                       Seabrook Station decontamination team had mop heads and handles but did not have any maslin cloth.
The Supply trailer was checked but no maslin cloth could be found.
POSSIBLE CAUSE: Over-site not tracking required supplies in supply trailer


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", Page 41, 45, and 49 equipment and supply inventory lists EFFECT: Not having the proper step off pads and maslin cloth would interfere with the proper operation of the radiological portion of the reception center. Create conditions that would cross contaminate evacuees and staff working in the reception center.
RECOMMENDATION: Take steps to procure the correct type step off pads and maslin cloth with sufficient quantities to support long term operations. Update inventory lists referenced above to include specific type step off pads and add mop-heads and handles along with maslin cloth.
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.17 Rochester Reception Center Female Monitoring/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
: a. MET: 3.a.1, 6.a.1.
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 108


NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", Page 41, 45, and 49 equipment and supply inventory lists EFFECT: Not having the proper step off pads and maslin cloth would interfere with the proper operation of the radiological portion of the reception center. Create conditions that would cross contaminate evacuees and staff working in the reception center.RECOMMENDATION:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
Take steps to procure the correct type step off pads and maslin cloth with sufficient quantities to support long term operations.
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station 3.3.8.18 Rockingham County State Transportation Staging Area In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
Update inventory lists referenced above to include specific type step off pads and add mop-heads and handles along with maslin cloth.c. DEFICIENCY:
: a. M ET: L.a. 1, 1.b. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2.
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None 3.3.8.17 Rochester Reception Center Female Monitoring/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 3.a.1, 6.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.19 Wentworth Douglas Hospital In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: a. MET: 6.d.1.
None 108 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8.18 Rockingham County State Transportation Staging Area In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. M ET: L.a. 1, 1.b. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None 3.3.8.19 Wentworth Douglas Hospital In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 6.d.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.20 Elliot Hospital In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: a. MET: 6.d.1.
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
None 3.3.8.20 Elliot Hospital In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 6.d.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None c. DEFICIENCY:
: c. DEFICIENCY: None
None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED:
: d. PLAN ISSUES: None
None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED:
: e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
None g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED:
: f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
None 109 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (PEP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station SECTION 4: CONCLUSION 110 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station APPENDIX A: IMPROVEMENT PLAN a' Isu Nu br 71-a -C itro ISSUE: During the conduct of the Seabrook Station (SS) Exercise on April 17, 2012, the Brentwood New Hamphire Emergency Operations Center (EOC) assigned a Radiological Defense (RADEF) Officer who had never been in the position before. The RADEF Officer did not understand his role in providing a briefing on dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI)to emergency workers before dispatching them to the field. He issued the dosimetry and KI without a briefing.RECOMMENDATION:
: g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 109
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (PEP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station SECTION 4: CONCLUSION 110
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                   Seabrook Station APPENDIX A: IMPROVEMENT PLAN Nu      a' Isu br       71-a       -C                                                                 itro ISSUE: During the conduct of the Seabrook Station (SS) Exercise on April 17, 2012, the Brentwood New Hamphire Emergency Operations Center (EOC) assigned a Radiological Defense (RADEF) Officer who had never been in the position before. The RADEF Officer did not understand his role in providing a briefing on dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI)to emergency workers before dispatching them to the field. He issued the dosimetry and KI without a briefing.
RECOMMENDATION:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:
CAPABILITY:                                                     PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: I Isu u br 71'a--C itein a ISSUE: The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) failed to supply potassium iodide (KI) tablets with a briefing to the entire facility staff as per Kingston Plans and Procedures.
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                             START DATE:
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENCY POC:                                                     ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
Procedures should be implemented that require the RADEF Officer and/or the EMD to compare the security sign-in sheet and. the Emergency Worker Potassium Iodide User Agreement Form 135A, Volume 8/Rev. 14, to ensure that all facility staff receives KI.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
IISSUE:
CAPABILITY:
Isu u br 71'a--C                                                                                             itein a The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) failed to supply potassium iodide (KI) tablets with a briefing to the entire facility staff as per Kingston Plans and Procedures.
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 111 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station I Isu u br 71-a l- Crtrin I I ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correctly.
RECOMMENDATION: Procedures should be implemented that require the RADEF Officer and/or the EMD to compare the security sign-in sheet and. the Emergency Worker Potassium Iodide User Agreement Form 135A, Volume 8/Rev. 14, to ensure that all facility staff receives KI.
RECOMMENDATION:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation.
CAPABILITY:                                                     PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                             START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                     ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
111
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                     Seabrook Station IIsu        u   br       71-a     l-                                                               Crtrin     I     I ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correctly.
RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations
: 9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
: 9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
: 10. DELETE 11. chance 11 to 10 CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
: 10. DELETE
CAPABILITY:
: 11. chance 11 to 10 CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
PRMR RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area.RECOMMENDATION:
CAPABILITY:                                                   PRMR RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures.
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                           START DATE:
Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.4. Replace paragraph  
AGENCY POC:                                                   ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
: 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone.
ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area.
Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.5. DELETE 6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.
CAPABILITY:
: 4. Replace paragraph 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone. Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 112 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Isu Nu br 571-6]P 0-ie n 6b]ISSUE: There was conflicting guidance given to vehicle Monitoring Team at the Manchester, NH Reception Center on the morning of March 24, 2012. The team members were confused as to which guidance was to be used.Controller and team members consulted the evaluator as to what guidance to use. As the team was initially were conducting monitoring of a vehicle, two team members were employed at the same time and both were using different heights from monitored surface and different speeds in inches per second over the vehicle surface. As just in time training and correction in place the evaluator instructed the team to proceed with the most conservative of the three different standards.
: 5. DELETE
RECOMMENDATION:
: 6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.
Establish one standard set of guidance for Vehicle Monitoring with a recommended distance of probe from of 1" from surface to be monitored and to move probe across surface to be monitored of 6" per second.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:
CAPABILITY:                                                   PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: ]START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Issue ~ 'tl Number: , 5 i7 lel-,- Crtrin lei ISSUE: The Field Monitoring Team (FMT) did not have a beta galmna survey instrument as called for in Procedure 2.11.RECOMMENDATION:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                             START DATE:
The Radiation Control Program should update Procedure 2.11 to address the change to the survey equipment for the environmental sampling program. Also, if it is intended that the FMT perform plume tracking then a beta gamma survey instrument should be included in the kit.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
AGENCY POC:                                                   ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
CAPABILITY:
112
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 113 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station I Isu ubr 71-a ] -P rtro:3 II ISSUE: Prior Issue 57-06-3al-A-08 was closed and replaced by this planning issue. The original performance issue stated that Members of the Maine Sampling Team from the Department of Health and Human Services wore the permanent record dosimeters (PRDs) they routinely wear, but no PRDs were included in the dosimetry provided with the sampling equipment and supplies or issued to DOA team members prior to their deployment from the State Emergency Operation Center.The Maine Emergency Management Agency has proposed that the non Radiation Control Program members of the Field Monitoring Team go to the York County EOC and obtain an emergency worker dosimetry packet. York County maintains a stockpile of PRD that they get from the State of New Hampshire.
 
RECOMMENDATION:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
This solution (all non RCP members of the FMT go to York County EOC to obtain dosimetry) needs to be documented in the plan and procedures so that all State Agencies and York County are aware of it.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                   Seabrook Station Isu     Nu     br     571-6]P                                                                         0-ie   n 6b]
CAPABILITY:
ISSUE: There was conflicting guidance given to vehicle Monitoring Team at the Manchester, NH Reception Center on the morning of March 24, 2012. The team members were confused as to which guidance was to be used.
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: I IseN m e:5 123]--C iein3a ]ISSUE: The primary RADEF Officer in the Town of Newfields was unavailable and the alternate RADEF Officer substituted during the exercise.
Controller and team members consulted the evaluator as to what guidance to use. As the team was initially were conducting monitoring of a vehicle, two team members were employed at the same time and both were using different heights from monitored surface and different speeds in inches per second over the vehicle surface. As just in time training and correction in place the evaluator instructed the team to proceed with the most conservative of the three different standards.
The alternate RADEF Officer was not familiar with zeroing the dosimetry.
RECOMMENDATION: Establish one standard set of guidance for Vehicle Monitoring with a recommended distance of probe from of 1" from surface to be monitored and to move probe across surface to be monitored of 6" per second.
The Alternate RADEF Office did not brief the officer of the need to contact the officer's immediate supervisor when the 200mR. reading was reached. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not brief the side effects of Potassium Iodide during the breifing until prompted by another staff member. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not understand the meaning of the 5 R turn back value and did not emphasize the turn back value meaning to the officer.RECOMMENDATION:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
The alternate RADEF Officer should be trained annually and participate in all exercises.
CAPABILITY:                                                       PRIMP_*_ARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                               ]START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                       ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
            ~ 'tl 5 Issue Number:               , i7*lel-,-                                                           Crtrin lei ISSUE: The Field Monitoring Team (FMT) did not have a beta galmna survey instrument as called for in Procedure 2.11.
RECOMMENDATION: The Radiation Control Program should update Procedure 2.11 to address the change to the survey equipment for the environmental sampling program. Also, if it is intended that the FMT perform plume tracking then a beta gamma survey instrument should be included in the kit.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:                                                       PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                               START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                       ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
113
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                   Seabrook Station IIsu ubr 71-a ] -P                                                                                   rtro:3II ISSUE: Prior Issue 57-06-3al-A-08 was closed and replaced by this planning issue. The original performance issue stated that Members of the Maine Sampling Team from the Department of Health and Human Services wore the permanent record dosimeters (PRDs) they routinely wear, but no PRDs were included in the dosimetry provided with the sampling equipment and supplies or issued to DOA team members prior to their deployment from the State Emergency Operation Center.
The Maine Emergency Management Agency has proposed that the non Radiation Control Program members of the Field Monitoring Team go to the York County EOC and obtain an emergency worker dosimetry packet. York County maintains a stockpile of PRD that they get from the State of New Hampshire.
RECOMMENDATION: This solution (all non RCP members of the FMT go to York County EOC to obtain dosimetry) needs to be documented in the plan and procedures so that all State Agencies and York County are aware of it.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:                                                   PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                           START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                   ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
IIseN ISSUE:
me:5 123]--C                                                                           iein3a ]
The primary RADEF Officer in the Town of Newfields was unavailable and the alternate RADEF Officer substituted during the exercise. The alternate RADEF Officer was not familiar with zeroing the dosimetry. The Alternate RADEF Office did not brief the officer of the need to contact the officer's immediate supervisor when the 200mR. reading was reached. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not brief the side effects of Potassium Iodide during the breifing until prompted by another staff member. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not understand the meaning of the 5 R turn back value and did not emphasize the turn back value meaning to the officer.
RECOMMENDATION: The alternate RADEF Officer should be trained annually and participate in all exercises.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:                                                  PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                          START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                  ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
114
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                    Seabrook Station IsueN mbr 5-2                        -A-                                                          Crteio ISSUE: The New Hampshire Field Monitoring Team I(FMT 1) did not receive sufficient direction to support characterization of the release. FMT 1 never received direction to find the leading edge of the plume. The sample locations of 3.2, 3.7 and 3.8 provided by the Monitoring Team Coordinator (MTC) to the FMT I Team Lead never allowed FMTI to encounter any reading above background. Both air samples taken by FMT I were taken in background areas.
RECOMMENDATION: The Accident Assessment team and MTC should coordinate more effectively to direct both FMTs to identify the leading edges of the plume. The plans and procedures should reflect the need to identify the leading edges of the plume. Identify in the plans and procedures what actually constitutes the leading edges of a plume. For example when FMTs identify dose rates 10 times background this will be considered the leading edge of the plume.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:                                                      PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                              START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                      ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
IIsu ISSUE:
u br 71-a --
CONDITION (describe the inadequacy):
C      itein Field Sampling Team members were not aware that after the release has been terminated and entry into the intermediate phase, the dose limit reverts from the EPA-400 limits to those of Occupation Radiation Workers which is 5 REM TEDE. They were also not aware that any exposure accumulated during the emergency phase is not included in the intermediate exposure received.
RECOMMENDATION: Update the DPHS plan to state the change in the dose limit for Emergency Workers and include the emergency phase exposure is not included in the intermediate phase exposure received.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:                                                      PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                              START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                      ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
115
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                      Seabrook Station Nu Isu    I br      71-      l--C                                                                    itein      e ISSUE: Prior to instrument use, no operational checks were perfortned that used a known source and required an instrument response to be within a prescribed range. Also, there was no label affixed to the instrument that defined an acceptable range for the instrument response to a specific source. This was the situation for each of the seven survey instruments used by Radiochemistry Unit.
RECOMMENDATION: Modify State procedures to require an operational check for laboratory instrumentation prior to use using a known source and a label affixed to the instrument that defines that the instrument response must fall within a specific range.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:                                                      PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                              START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                      ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
[is-Sue Number: 57-12-3a]-A-                                                                          Criterion: 3a 1 1 ISSUE: Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.
The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gave inadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aid conflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains all information needed for emergency worker exposure control. The Radiological Officer also skipped important information that emergency workers needed to be briefed on prior to being deployed to the field (the Radiological Officer did not read off the Briefing Form that the State had provided to all EOCs)- the Radiological Officer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOC when the dosimeter reaches IR. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer provided inaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers who may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at a nuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose occupation carries with it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declaration in writing if they-are or think that they may be pregnant.
The Radiological Officer also had a Job Aid that conflicted with the Briefing Form that the State provided to the Emergency Operations Center.
The Radiological Officer was also using Rev 13 for Form 305A, which is out of date. Rev 14 Forms are the most up to date and and FEMA approved forms for emergency workers.
The Emergency Operations Center also had the wrong inventory form for the emergency worker kits. The one provided was out of date.
RECOMMENDATION: This previous issue was not corrected.
Training needs to be provided to the Radiological Officer. Rev 13 Forms need to be destroyed. The Job Aid must align with the Incident Annex and Implementing Procedures, as well as the City's Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:                                                      PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                              START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                      ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
116
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                      Seabrook Station Is      N57-12-6a].                A-                                                            Crteio*I        6a ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.
: 4. Replace paragraph 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone. Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.
: 5. Delete
: 6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:
CAPABILITY:                                                     P                RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 114 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station IsueN mbr 5-2 -A -Crteio ISSUE: The New Hampshire Field Monitoring Team I(FMT 1) did not receive sufficient direction to support characterization of the release. FMT 1 never received direction to find the leading edge of the plume. The sample locations of 3.2, 3.7 and 3.8 provided by the Monitoring Team Coordinator (MTC) to the FMT I Team Lead never allowed FMTI to encounter any reading above background.
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                               START DATE:
Both air samples taken by FMT I were taken in background areas.RECOMMENDATION:
AGENCY POC:                                                     ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
The Accident Assessment team and MTC should coordinate more effectively to direct both FMTs to identify the leading edges of the plume. The plans and procedures should reflect the need to identify the leading edges of the plume. Identify in the plans and procedures what actually constitutes the leading edges of a plume. For example when FMTs identify dose rates 10 times background this will be considered the leading edge of the plume.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correct RECOMMENDATION: : Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations
CAPABILITY:
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: I Isu u br 71-a --C itein ISSUE: CONDITION (describe the inadequacy):
Field Sampling Team members were not aware that after the release has been terminated and entry into the intermediate phase, the dose limit reverts from the EPA-400 limits to those of Occupation Radiation Workers which is 5 REM TEDE. They were also not aware that any exposure accumulated during the emergency phase is not included in the intermediate exposure received.RECOMMENDATION:
Update the DPHS plan to state the change in the dose limit for Emergency Workers and include the emergency phase exposure is not included in the intermediate phase exposure received.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 115 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station I Isu Nu br 71- l--C itein e ISSUE: Prior to instrument use, no operational checks were perfortned that used a known source and required an instrument response to be within a prescribed range. Also, there was no label affixed to the instrument that defined an acceptable range for the instrument response to a specific source. This was the situation for each of the seven survey instruments used by Radiochemistry Unit.RECOMMENDATION:
Modify State procedures to require an operational check for laboratory instrumentation prior to use using a known source and a label affixed to the instrument that defines that the instrument response must fall within a specific range.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:[is-Sue Number: 57-12-3a]-A-Criterion:
3a 1 1 ISSUE: Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC)staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.
The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gave inadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aid conflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains all information needed for emergency worker exposure control. The Radiological Officer also skipped important information that emergency workers needed to be briefed on prior to being deployed to the field (the Radiological Officer did not read off the Briefing Form that the State had provided to all EOCs)- the Radiological Officer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOC when the dosimeter reaches IR. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer provided inaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers who may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at a nuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose occupation carries with it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declaration in writing if they-are or think that they may be pregnant.The Radiological Officer also had a Job Aid that conflicted with the Briefing Form that the State provided to the Emergency Operations Center.The Radiological Officer was also using Rev 13 for Form 305A, which is out of date. Rev 14 Forms are the most up to date and and FEMA approved forms for emergency workers.The Emergency Operations Center also had the wrong inventory form for the emergency worker kits. The one provided was out of date.RECOMMENDATION:
This previous issue was not corrected.
Training needs to be provided to the Radiological Officer. Rev 13 Forms need to be destroyed.
The Job Aid must align with the Incident Annex and Implementing Procedures, as well as the City's Radiological Emergency Response Plan.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 116 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Is N57-12-6a].
A- 6a ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area RECOMMENDATION:
Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures.
Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.4. Replace paragraph
: 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone.
Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.5. Delete 6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:
P RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correct RECOMMENDATION:  
: Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation.
Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations
: 9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
: 9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
: 10. DELETE 11. change 11 to 10 CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
: 10. DELETE
CAPABILITY:
: 11. change 11 to 10 CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 117 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station I Issu Nunbr 571-a--C itein ISSUE:: INADEQUATE SUPPLIES: Supply Issue: The Male Decontamination Team did not use the correct step off pads, they used a heavy paper pad labeled "Step Off Pad". They needed the multi page plastic step off pads. Reception center supply was checked and correct pads were not available.
CAPABILITY:                                                       PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
Supply Issue: Procedures call for maslin mops to mop walk ways to pick up contamination that may have dropped on the floor. The male monitoring and decontamination team had mop heads and handles but did not have any maslin cloth. The Supply trailer was checked but no maslin cloth could be found.RECOMMENDATION:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                               START DATE:
Take steps to procure the correct type step off pads and maslin cloth with sufficient quantities to support long term operations.
AGENCY POC:                                                       ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
Update inventory lists referenced above to include specific type step off pads and add mop-heads and handles along with maslin cloth.CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
117
CAPABILITY:
 
PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 118 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/improvement Plan Seabrook Station APPENDIX B: BEST PRACTICES 1. Excellent Initiative by Hampton Summary: In speaking with the Emergency Management Director (EMD), one of the initiatives that he brought to my attention was with "special populations." He noted that the town was now including children between the ages of 10-15 in the special population group, that is, children who were decision makers but who needed assistance in evacuating the town.Description:
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
In speaking with the Emergency Management Director (EMD), one of the initiatives that he brought to my attention was with "special populations." He noted that the town was now including children between the ages of 10-15 in the special population group, that is, children who were decision makers but who needed assistance in evacuating the town. In a specific case, there was a 14 year old who was home alone -her mother was working in Portsmouth.
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                   Seabrook Station I Issu   Nunbr 571-a--C                                                                                   itein ISSUE:: INADEQUATE SUPPLIES:
In her case, she knows that she needs to evacuate but she cannot drive a car.Therefore, the EMD would be sure to include her in the population to be transported.
Supply Issue: The Male Decontamination Team did not use the correct step off pads, they used a heavy paper pad labeled "Step Off Pad". They needed the multi page plastic step off pads. Reception center supply was checked and correct pads were not available.
This is definitely an underserved population.
Supply Issue: Procedures call for maslin mops to mop walk ways to pick up contamination that may have dropped on the floor. The male monitoring and decontamination team had mop heads and handles but did not have any maslin cloth. The Supply trailer was checked but no maslin cloth could be found.
: 2. York County Emergency Management Agency EOC and facility modernization Summary: York County relocated its Emergency Management Agency and Emergency Operations Center (EOC) location to a new site at 149 Jordan Spring Rd., in Alfred, ME within the past year and, as a result, created a facility that is an excellent model for any EOC supporting an agency of comparable size. The facility has excellent space available, security, equipage and habitability for extended EOC operations as well as routine activities.
RECOMMENDATION: Take steps to procure the correct type step off pads and maslin cloth with sufficient quantities to support long term operations. Update inventory lists referenced above to include specific type step off pads and add mop-heads and handles along with maslin cloth.
It is evident that significant appropriate planning was done to accommodate virtually any weather event durability-wise or other types of emergencies requiring staffing of almost any level that can be anticipated for the Agency. This includes providing effective backup power, upgrading windows and air handling systems and making the best use of spaces available.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:
CAPABILITY:                                                   PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
CAPABILITY ELEMENT:                                           START DATE:
AGENCY POC:                                                   ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
118
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station APPENDIX B: BEST PRACTICES
: 1. Excellent Initiative by Hampton Summary: In speaking with the Emergency Management Director (EMD), one of the initiatives that he brought to my attention was with "special populations." He noted that the town was now including children between the ages of 10-15 in the special population group, that is, children who were decision makers but who needed assistance in evacuating the town.


==
==
Description:==
Description:==
In speaking with the Emergency Management Director (EMD), one of the initiatives that he brought to my attention was with "special populations." He noted that the town was now including children between the ages of 10-15 in the special population group, that is, children who were decision makers but who needed assistance in evacuating the town. In a specific case, there was a 14 year old who was home alone - her mother was working in Portsmouth. In her case, she knows that she needs to evacuate but she cannot drive a car.
Therefore, the EMD would be sure to include her in the population to be transported. This is definitely an underserved population.
: 2. York County Emergency Management Agency EOC and facility modernization Summary: York County relocated its Emergency Management Agency and Emergency Operations Center (EOC) location to a new site at 149 Jordan Spring Rd., in Alfred, ME within the past year and, as a result, created a facility that is an excellent model for any EOC supporting an agency of comparable size. The facility has excellent space available, security, equipage and habitability for extended EOC operations as well as routine activities. It is evident that significant appropriate planning was done to accommodate virtually any weather event durability-wise or other types of emergencies requiring staffing of almost any level that can be anticipated for the Agency. This includes providing effective backup power, upgrading windows and air handling systems and making the best use of spaces available.


The recent facility relocation and upgrade at the York County Emergency Agency facility provides an excellent model for any agency of its size and mission.119 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3. Access to Critical Facilites Summary: Access to critical communications areas needs to be controlled to reduce vulnerability regardless of the type of event.Description:
==
Description:==
The recent facility relocation and upgrade at the York County Emergency Agency facility provides an excellent model for any agency of its size and mission.
119
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station
: 3. Access to Critical Facilites Summary: Access to critical communications areas needs to be controlled to reduce vulnerability regardless of the type of event.
 
==
Description:==
Access to the Rockingham County Dispatch Center is electronically controlled through three doors prior to gaining admittance to the dispatching area. TV screens in the dispatch area display real time status of the security system. One TV screen displayed door status throughout the facility and a second TV screen display security cameras, some of which were movement activated.
Access to the Rockingham County Dispatch Center is electronically controlled through three doors prior to gaining admittance to the dispatching area. TV screens in the dispatch area display real time status of the security system. One TV screen displayed door status throughout the facility and a second TV screen display security cameras, some of which were movement activated.
: 4. Communications Summary: In ability to communicate with neighboring states via organic radio systems and with using RACES resources.
: 4. Communications Summary: In ability to communicate with neighboring states via organic radio systems and with using RACES resources.
Line 1,088: Line 1,876:
==
==
Description:==
Description:==
Maine (MEMA) communications office coordinated with MEMA (Massachusetts) communications officer having similar problems with talking to Maine Emergency Management.
Mass provided a radio to Maine which now allowed Maine to connect with the Amesbury, Mass repeater. This now allowed Mass to communicate with Maine and allowed Maine to communicate with five other New England states.
Maine RACES: installed a repeater on Mount Washington this now provided an ability to communicated with the New Hampshire SEOC.
: 5. Job Aid for Vehicle Monitoring Summary: The Vehicle Monitoring Team Leader at the Souht Manchester, NH Middle School Reception Center developed a Job Aid for the Vehicle Monitoring Team


Maine (MEMA) communications office coordinated with MEMA (Massachusetts) communications officer having similar problems with talking to Maine Emergency Management.
==
Mass provided a radio to Maine which now allowed Maine to connect with the Amesbury, Mass repeater.
Description:==
This now allowed Mass to communicate with Maine and allowed Maine to communicate with five other New England states.Maine RACES: installed a repeater on Mount Washington this now provided an ability to communicated with the New Hampshire SEOC.5. Job Aid for Vehicle Monitoring Summary: The Vehicle Monitoring Team Leader at the Souht Manchester, NH Middle School Reception Center developed a Job Aid for the Vehicle Monitoring Team
The Team Leader provided team members with xerographoic copies of the survey instrumet faces that were enlarged to twice or three times actual size so thst team members could familiarize themselves with the meter faces and better interpert meter readings.
120
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                Seabrook Station APPENDIX C: EXERCISE TIMELINE Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Emergency Classification Levelor          Z:
Event~
Unusual Event                          N/A            N/A          N/A            N/A    N/A  N/A          N/A Alert                                  0813          0823          0823          0831    0839 0842          0840 Site Area Emergency                    1000            1008        1003            1015    1006 1015          1012 General Emergency                      1115            1120        1118            1132    1118 1135          1131 Simulated Rad.Release Started          1129            1134        1133            N/A    1133 1135          1148 Simulated Rad. Release                  NAN/A                        N/A            N/A    N/A                N/A Terminated Facility Declared Operational                          0855          0905            N/A    0906 0845          0910 Declaration of State of Emergency                      1000        0956                    1005 0956          1006 Exercise Terminated                                    1350          1334                  1330 1300          1338 Early Precautionary Actions:                          0905          0915                    0952 1018          0938 1st Protective Action Decision:                        1105          1138                  1110 1121          1144 1st Siren Activation                                    1039          1039          1039    1030 1039          1030 1st EAS or EBS Message                                  1042          1042          1042    1030 1042          1030 2nd Protective Action Decision:                        1115          1226                  1115 1226          1112 2nd Siren Activation                                    1121          1155          1121    1110 1121          1112 2nd EAS or EBS Message                                  1124          1158          1124    1110 1124          1112 3rd Protective Action Decision:                        1139                                N/A  1230          1144 3rd Siren Activation                                    1145          1234          1155    1149 1153          N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message                                  1155          1237          1158    1149 1158          1144 4th Protective Action Decision:                        1255                                N/A  N/A          N/A 4th Siren Activation                                    1234          1310          1234    N/A  1234          1225 4th EAS or EBS Message                                  1237          1313          1237    N/A  1237          1-225 5th Protective Action Decision:                        N/A                                  N/A  N/A          N/A 5th Siren Activation                                    1310                        1310    N/A  N/A          1303 5th EAS or EBS Message                                  1313                        1313    N/A  N/A          1303 6th Protective Action Decision:                        N/A                                  N/A  N/A          N/A 6th Siren Activation                                    N/A                                  N/A  N/A          N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message                                  N/A                                  N/A  N/A          N/A KI Administration Decision:                            1139        1144            1152    1149 1135          1148 121
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                  Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH 0                  U U                  0 Eergency Classification Level or      >0 SEvent                                                    a<
Unusual Event                          N/A              N/A          N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A              N/A Alert                                  0813            0837          N/A            0838    0837  0835            0835 Site Area Emergency                    1000            1014          N/A            1014    1016  1014            1014 General Emergency                      1115            1123          N/A            1133    1136  1133            1136 Simulated Rad. Release Started          1129            1147          N/A            1150    1148  1145            1136 Simulated Rad. Release                  N/A            N/A          N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A              N/A Terminated____________
Facility Declared Operational                          0855          N/A            0907    0900  0945            0914 Declaration of State of Emergency                        1006        N/A            0956    1006  1007            1012 Exercise Terminated                                      1338        N/A            1331    1215  1337            1339 Early Precautionary Actions:                            1032        N/A            N/A    0938  0938            1000 Protective Action Decision:                          1032        N/A        .st1030      1030  1112            1145 1st Siren Activation                                    1039        N/A            1039    1039  1039            1155 1 st EAS or EBS Message                                  1042        N/A            1042    1042  1042            1158 2nd Protective Action Decision:                          1114        N/A            N/A    1111  N/A              1301 2nd Siren Activation                                    1121        N/A            1121    1121  1121            1310 2nd EAS or EBS Message                                  1124        N/A            1124    1124  1124            1313 3rd Protective Action Decision:                          1150        N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A        ______
3rd Siren Activation                                    1155        N/A            1155    1155  1155            N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message                                  1158        N/A            1158    1158  1158            N/A 4th Protective Action Decision:                          1225        N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A        _____
4th Siren Activation                                    1234        N/A            N/A    N/A    1310      _____
4th EAS or EBS Message                                  1237        N/A            N/A    N/A    1313      _____
5th Protective Action Decision:                                      N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A        ______
5th Siren Activation                                                  N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message                              ______            N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A 6th Protective Action Decision:                                      N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A 6th Siren Activation                                                  N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A              N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message                                                N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A KI Administration Decision:                  1          1147        N/A            1148    1148  1145            1201 122
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                      Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH 0          U                              L  ..
Em.er.gency Classification Level or Event
      "                                      1-
                                            *....                                          Z          .
Unusual Event                              N/A                N/A        . N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A          N/A Alert                                      0813              0837          0839          0835    0837    N/A          0906 Site Area Emergency                        1000              1027          1019          1010    1015    N/A          1027 GeneralEmergency                          1115              1136          1136          1132    1135    N/A          1137 Simulated Rad. Release Started              1129              1152          1146          1205    1145    N/A          N/A Simulated Rad. Release                    N/A                N/A          N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A          N/A Terminated                            _____
Facility Declared Operational                                0912          0918          0909    1000    N/A          0945 Declaration of State of Emergency                            1027          1008          1000    N/A    N/A          1007 Exercise Tenrinated                                          1338          N/A            1339    1340    N/A          1329 Early Precautionary Actions:                                  1000          111l          1003    1018    N/A          0940 1st  Protective Action Decision:                                            1031          1147    1148    N/A 1Ist Siren Activation                                        1039          N/A            1039    1039    N/A Icst EAS or EBS Message                                      1042          N/A            1042    1042    N/A 2nd Protective Action Decision:                              1152          N/A            1237    1229    N/A 2nd Siren Activation                                          1155          1ll5          1121    1155    N/A 2nd EAS orEBS Message                                        1158          N/A            1124    1158    N/A 3rd Protective Action Decision:                              1152          N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A 3rd Siren Activation                                          1234          1226          1155    1234    N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message                                        1237          N/A            1158    1237    N/A 4th Protective Action Decision:                                            N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A 4th Siren Activation                                                        N/A            1234    1310    N/A 4th EAS or EBS Message                                                      N/A            1237    1313    N/A 5th Protective Action Decision:                                            N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A 5th Siren Activation                                                        N/A            1310    N/A    N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message                                                      N/A          1313    N/A    N/A 6th Protective Action Decision:                                              N/A          N/A    N/A    N/A 6th Siren Activation                                                        N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message                                                      N/A            N/A    N/A    N/A KI Administration Decision:                                  1152          1146          1216    1200  N/A 123
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                        Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Emergency Classification Level or          >.
Event                                                                                        C.'
: o.    ..      :.        .. J 2>
Unusual Event                              N/A              N/A          N/A          N/A    N/A      N/A          N/A Alert                                      0813              N/A          0835          N/A    0845    0838          0838 Site Area Emergency                        1000              N/A          1013          N/A    1016    1009          1018 General Emergency                          1115              N/A          1133          N/A    1136    1132    1    1133 Simulated Rad. Release Started            1129              N/A          1211          N/A    1146    N/A          1145 Simulated Rad. Release                    N/A              N/A          N/A          N/A    N/A      N/A          N/A Terminated                            _______________________
Facility Declared Operational                                N/A          0840          N/A    0856    0958          0943 Declaration of State of Emergency                            N/A          1003          N/A    0956    1010          0956 Exercise Terminated                                          N/A          1327          N/A    1337    1337          1337 Early Precautionary Actions:                                  N/A        0915          N/A    0943    0940          N/A Protective Action Decision:                              N/A
                                                              -st        1121          N/A    1030    N/A            N/A I1stSiren Activation                                          N/A          1033          N/A    1039    N/A          1039 1st EAS or EBS Message                                      N/A          1039          N/A    1042    N/A          1042 2nd Protective Action Decision:                              N/A          1145          N/A    1115    N/A          N/A 2nd Siren Activation                                          N/A          1115          N/A    1121    N/A          1121 2nd EAS or EBS Message                                      N/A          1121          N/A    1124    N/A          1124 3rd Protective Action Decision:                              N/A    ______            N/A    1145    N/A          N/A 3rd Siren Activation                                          N/A          1150          N/A    1155    N/A          1155 3rd EAS or EBS Message                                        N/A          1158          N/A    1158    N/A          1158 4th Protective Action Decision:                              N/A    ______            N/A    122 4    N/A          N/A 4th Siren Activation                                          N/A          1234          N/A      1234    N/A          1234 4th EAS or EBS Message                                        N/A          1237          N/A    1237    N/A          1237 5th Protective Action Decision:                              N/A                        N/A      N/A    N/A          N/A 5th Siren Activation                                          N/A        0835          N/A    1310    N/A          1310 SthEASrorEBSmMessage                                          N/A                        N/A      1313    N/A          1313 6th Protective Action Decision:                              N/A          1133          N/A      N/A    N/A          N/A 6th Siren Activation                                          N/A          1211          N/A      N/A    N/A          N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message                                        N/A                        N/A    N/A      N/A          N/A IsKIAdministration Decision:                                N/A          1211          N/A    1145    N/A          1149 124
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                      Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Emergency Classification Level or                                                                                          0 U          0 Eveits                                    C/
Unusual Event                            N/A            N/A            N/A          N/A    N/A        N/A            N/A Alert                                    0813          0823            0823          0830    0831      0832            0832 Site Area Emergency                      1000            1008          1003          1018    102'2      1031            1030 General Emergency                       1115            1128          1118          1135    1145      1148      1    1148 Simulated Rad.Release Started            1129            1148          1133          1129    1145      1148            1148 Simulated Rad. Release                  N/A            N/A            N/A          N/A    N/A        N/A            N/A Terminated____________                                                                              ______          ______
Facility Declared Operational                            0845          0905          0846    0849      0900            0925 Declaration of State of Emergency                        0920          1003          0920    1040      0934            0942 Exercise Terminated                                      1335          1334          1345    1345      1347            N/A Early Precautionary Actions:                            0920          0928          0920    0928      0920            0940 1stProtective Action Decision:                          1029            1111                N/A        1112            N/A 1st Siren Activation                                    1039            1039        1039    1039      1039            1037 1st EAS or BBS Message                                  1042          1042          1042    1042      1042            1037 2nd Protective Action Decision:                          1109          1136          1106    1110      1140            1119 2nd Siren Activation                                    1121            1121        1121    1121      1121            1121 2nd EAS or ElS Message                                  1124            1124        1124    1124      1124            1124 3rd Protective Action Decision:                          1139                                1150      N/A            N/A 3rd Siren Activation                                    1155            1155        1155    1155      1155            1155 3rd EAS or EBS Message                                  1158            1158        1158    1158      1158            1158 4th Protective Action Decision:                                                              1228      N/A            1314 4th Siren Activation                                                    1234        1234    1234      N/A            1310 4th EAS or EBS Message                                                  1237        1237    1237      N/A            1313 5th Protective Action Decision:                                                                1307      N/A            N/A 5th Siren Activation                                                    1310        1310    1310      N/A            N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message                              _    ____          1313        1313    1313      N/A            N/A 6th Protective Action Decision:                    ___________                    _____      N/A      N/A            N/A 6th Siren Activation                                ___________                    _____      N/A      N/A            N/A 16th EAS or EBS Message                            ___________                    _____      N/A      N/A            N/A IKI Administration Decision:                            1128            1118        1135    1145      1140            1147 125
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                            Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH UU Emergency Classification Level or    :i.               "
Event .                                                                  U
        * ....    ,....... ....    .      "...... ..      Z.:                                ...
Unusuaml Event                          N/A          N/A            N/A          N/A  N/A    N/A Alert                                  0813          0829          0831          0833 0917    0838 Site Area Emergency                    1000          1014          1014          1015 1016    1020 General Emergency                      1115          1146          1144          1145 1139    1136 Simulated Rad. Release Started          1129          1147          1129          1129 1139    N/A Simulated Rad. Release                  N/A          N/A            N/A          N/A  1500    N/A Terminated Facility Declared Operational                        0903          0853          0855 0930    0900 Declaration of State of Emergency                    0935          0943          0920 1135    1139 Exercise Terminated                                  N/A            1347          N/A  1400    1420 Early Precautionary Actions:                          0930          0930          0920 1017    1049 1st Protective Action Decision:                      1110          1111          1145 N/A    N/A Ist Siren Activation                                  1121          1039          1039 N/A    N/A 1st EAS or EBS Message                                1124          1042          1042 N/A    N/A 2nd Protective Action Decision:                      1150          1146          1215 N/A    N/A 2nd Siren Activation                                  1155          1121          1121 N/A    N/A 2nd EAS or EBS Message                                1158          1124          1124 N/A    N/A 3rd Protective Action Decision:                      1221                        1238 N/A    N/A 3rd Siren Activation                                  1234          1155          1155 N/A    N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message                                1237          1158          1158 N/A    N/A 4th Protective Action Decision:                      N/A                          N/A  N/A    N/A 4th Siren Activation                                  N/A            1234          1234 N/A    N/A 4th EAS or EBS Message                                N/A            1237          1237 N/A    N/A 5th Protective Action Decision:                      N/A                          N/A  N/A    N/A 5th Siren Activation                                  N/A            1310          N/A  N/A    N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message                                N/A            1313          N/A  N/A    N/A 6th Protective Action Decision:                      N/A                          N/A  N/A    N/A 6th Siren Activation                                  N/A                          N/A  N/A    N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message                                N/A                          N/A  N/A    N/A KI Administration Decision:                          1146          1146          1145 1245    1043 126
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                  Seabrook Station APPENDIX D: EXERCISE EVALUATORS AND TEAM LEADERS 127
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                Seabrook Station DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH LOCATION                                                                      EVALUATOR            AGENCY NH State Emergency Operations Center                                          Patricia Foster      FEMA    RI Michael Shuler      FEMA    RIII Kim Wood            ICFI NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility                                          *Thomas Essig        ICFI John McGough        FEMA    - RI NH State Police Communications Center, NIH State Warning Point                Kim Wood            ICFI Rockingham County Dispatch Center                                              *Paul Ringheiser    ICFI Cheryl Weaver        ICF NH (SS) Joint Infornation Center                                              *Paul Nied          ICFI NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-i                                                *Johanna Berkey      FEMA    RX NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2                                                *Martin Vyenielo    FEMA RIIl Massachusetts State Emergency Operations Center                                Ronald Biernacki    ICFI Brian Kennedy        FEMA William Palmer      ICF MA (SS) Emergency Operations Facility                                          Brad McRee          ICF
                                                                              *Roy Smith          ICFI MA Region I EOC                                                                Terry Sheehan        DOT
                                                                              *David White        ICFI MA (SS) Joint Information Center                                              Paul Nied            ICFI MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-I                                                *Michael Howe        FEMA HQ MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2                                                *Marcy Campbell      ICFI MA Media Center                                                                *Meg Swearingen      ICFI MA State Laboratory - Day 2                                                    *Michael Howe        FEMA    HQ NH State Emergency Operations Center Day 2                                    *Michael Shuler      FEMA    RIII Bill Webb            FEMA    RX NH - Field Sampling Team - 1                                                  *Martin Vyenielo    FEMA    RIII NH - Field Sampling Team - 2                                                  *Johanna Berkey      FEMA RX NH State Laboratory - Day 2                                                    *Daryl Thome        ICFI ME State Emergency Operations Center                                          *Robert Swartz      FEMA RI ME State Emergency Operations Center - Day 2                                  Richard McPeak      ICFI
                                                                              *Robert Swartz      FEMA RI ME Incident Field Office ME Incident Field Office - Day 2 ME Field Sampling Team - I                                                    *Reggie Rodgers      ICFI ME State Health and Environmental Testing Laboratory                          *Kent Tosch          ICFI NH State EOC Local Liaison                                                    Bridget Ahlgrim      FEMA    HQ Brad DeKorte        FEMA    RVI Rebecca Fontenot    FEMA    HQ Rochester Reception Center Dosimetry Issue and Briefing, Emergency Helen LaForge                    FEMA    RI Worker Dosimeter Brentwood Local EOC                                                            Michael Petullo      ICFI
                                                                              *Mario Vigliani      ICFI East Kingston Local EOC                                                        Deborah Blunt        ICFI
                                                                              *Bruce Swiren        ICFI Exeter Local EOC                                                              Ann Mulvaney        FEMA RI
_                                                                              *Clayton Spangenberg ICFI Greenland Local EOC                                                            *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI 128
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                Seabrook Station Hampton Local EOC                                                              Betsy Snell        FEMA - RI
                                                                              *Kent Tosch        ICFI Hampton Falls Local EOC                                                        *Laura Forrest      FEMA RII Thomas Gahan        ICFI Kensington Local EOC                                                          Patrick Taylor      ICFI
                                                                              *Miriatn Weston    FEMA RII Kingston NiH Local EOC                                                        Gary Bolender      ICFI
                                                                              *Brian Hasemann    FEMA RII New Castle Local EOC                                                          Henry Christiansen  ICFI
                                                                              *Patricia Mason    FEMA RII Newfields Local EOC                                                            Jon Christiansen    ICFI
                                                                              *Anthony Honnellio  EPA Newton Local EOC                                                              Mark Dalton        ICFI
                                                                              *Linda Gee          FEMA RVI North Hampton Local EOC                                                        Joseph Lischinsky  ICFI
                                                                              *Timothy Pflieger  FEMA RVI Portsmouth Local EOC                                                          *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Rye Local EOC                                                                  *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Seabrook Local EOC                                                            *Patricia Gardner  FEMA - HQ Gary Goldberg      ICFI South Hampton Local EOC                                                        *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Stratham Local EOC                                                            Nulise Francois Wanda Gaudet        FEMA - RI
                                                                              *Helen LaForge      FEMA RI Amesbury Local EOC                                                            *Richard Echavarria FEMA RIX Wes Ryals          ICF Merrimac Local EOC                                                            Elena Joyner        FEMA RIX
                                                                              *Daryl Thome        ICFI Newbury Local EOC                                                              *Rosemary Samsel    ICFI Alberto Sifuentes  FEMA RIX Newburyport Local EOC                                                          Paul Anderson      FEMA RIX
                                                                              *David Petta        ICFI Salisbury Local EOC                                                            *Ingrid Bruns      FEMA RI Danny Loomis        ICFI West Newbury Local EOC                                                        *Larry Broockerd    FEMA HQ Roger Jobe          ICFI Amesbury: Amesbury Schools Superintendent                                      *John Rice          FEMA RI Pentucket Schools Superintendent                                              *John Rice          FEMA RI ME York County EOC                                                            Richard Fournier    ICFI
                                                                              *Bonnie Sheffield  FEMA -RVIII Adeline C. Marston School                                                      *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Coorperative Middle School                                                    *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Heronfield Academy                                                            *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Winnacunnet High School                                                        *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Seabrook Elementary School                                                    *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Lincoln Street Elementary School                                              *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Swasey Central School                                                          *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Kensignton Elementary School                                                  *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Sanborn Region High School                                                    *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Memorial School                                                                *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Exeter High School                                                            *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI 129
 
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                              Seabrook Station Hampton Academy                                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI North Hampton School                                                          *Melissa Savilonis FEMA    - RI Greenland Central School                                                      *Melissa Savilonis FEMA    - RI New Franklin School                                                            *Melissa Savilonis FEMA    - RI Lister Academy                                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA    - RI Amesbury:    Amesbury Academy Charter                                        *John Rice        FEMA    RI Amesbury:    Cashman School                                                  *John Rice        FEMA    RI Amesbury:    Little Sprouts Daycare                                          *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Amesbury:    Sparhawk Lower School                                            *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Methuen: Timony School                                                        *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Amesbury:Camp Bauercrest                                                      *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Residential Options                                              *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newbury: Triton Supt.                                                         *Melissa Savilonis FEMA    - RI Newburyport: Coastal Alternative School                                        *Melissa Savilonis FEMA    - RI Newburyport: Community Action-Head Start                                      *Melissa Savilonis FEMA    - RI W. NewburyPathways for Learning                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA    - RI West Newbury: Learning Tree Preschool                                          *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Tewksbury High School                                                          *John Rice        FEMA RI Salisbury: New Beginnings Learning Center                                      *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Kinder Care Daniel Lucy                                          *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Nock Middle School                                               *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Newburyport Supt.                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Kinder Care Low Street                                            *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Mrs. Murrays Preschool                                            *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Newburyport High School                                          *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Newburyport Residence                                            *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Newburyport Montessori                                            *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI A Place to Grow                                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Rockingham County Nursing Home                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Polka Dots Childcare Center                                                    *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Appleseeds Day Care                                                            *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Donna Clarke Family Day Care                                                  *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Stratham Circle Learning Center                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Great Bay Kid's Company                                                        *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newton Learning Center                                                         *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Over the Rainbow                                                              *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI My First School                                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Imprints Day School                                                            *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Kids Stop Inc.                                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Ctr                                        *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI The Ridge at Riverwoods                                                        *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI DeColores Childrens Center                                                    *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Clipper Habor of Portsmouth CRC                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI The Childrens Garden                                                          *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Edgewood Center                                                                *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Edgewood Learning Center                                                      *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI 130


== Description:==
Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                                Seabrook Station Kindercare Learning Center                                                    *Melissa Savilonis    FEMA - RI Kathleen Tostenson                                                            *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Pats Family Child Care                                                        *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Live Y'ers                                                                    *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Newburyport: Inn Street Montessori                                            *John Rice          FEMA RI Rochester Local EOC                                                          Barton Freeman        FEMA RIII
                                                                              *Katherine Nishihara FEMA RIX Dover Local EOC                                                              James Chemiack
                                                                              *Edward Diaz        FEMA RV Manchester Local EOC                                                          Brian Collins        FEMA - RI
                                                                              *Kenneth Wierman    FEMA HQ Manchester MHS Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring Rochester Reception Center                                                    *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Rochester Reception Center Vehicles                                            Don Carlton          FEMA RI Rochester Reception Center Registration                                        Helen LaForge        FEMA    RI Manchester HS Reception Center Operations                                      *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA    - RI Manchester Reception Center Dosimetry                                          Helen LaForge        FEMA    RI Manchester Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon                                  Don Carlton          FEMA    RI Manchester Reception Center Female Mon/Decon                                  Taneeka Hollins      FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Registration                                      Barbara Thomas      FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Male Decon                                        Robert Swartz        FEMA    RI Manchester Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring                      John Rice            FEMA    RI Rochester Reception Center Portal and Secondary Monitoring                    Ingrid Bruns        FEMA    RI Rochester Reception Center Male Monitoring/Decon                              Robert Swartz        FEMA    RI Rochester Reception Center Female Monitoring/Decon                            Taneeka Hollins      FEMA RI Rockingham County State Transportation Staging Area                            Ingrid Bruns        FEMA RI Helen LaForge        FEMA RI
                                                                              *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Barbara Thomas      FEMA RI Wentworth Douglas Hospital                                                    *Helen LaForge      FEMA RI Elliot Hospital                                                                *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Lexington: Minuteman High School                                              *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Methuen: Methuen High School                                                  *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Wilmington: Shriner's Auditorium                                              *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI Wakefield: Wakefield High School                                              *John Rice          FEMA RI MA KIDispensing Site-Danvers                                                  *Melissa Savilonis  FEMA - RI MA State Police Assembly- Troop A                                              *John Rice          FEMA RI Methuen: Marash Grammer School                                                *John Rice          FEMA I
:
* Team Leader, 131


The Team Leader provided team members with xerographoic copies of the survey instrumet faces that were enlarged to twice or three times actual size so thst team members could familiarize themselves with the meter faces and better interpert meter readings.120 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station APPENDIX C: EXERCISE TIMELINE Table 1 -DATE: 2012-04-18, Exercise Timeline SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Emergency Classification Levelor Z: Event~Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0823 0823 0831 0839 0842 0840 Site Area Emergency 1000 1008 1003 1015 1006 1015 1012 General Emergency 1115 1120 1118 1132 1118 1135 1131 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1129 1134 1133 N/A 1133 1135 1148 Simulated Rad. Release NAN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated Facility Declared Operational 0855 0905 N/A 0906 0845 0910 Declaration of State of Emergency 1000 0956 1005 0956 1006 Exercise Terminated 1350 1334 1330 1300 1338 Early Precautionary Actions: 0905 0915 0952 1018 0938 1 st Protective Action Decision:
Unclassified Radiological EmergenO,&#xfd;-Preparedness Program (REP)
1105 1138 1110 1121 1144 1st Siren Activation 1039 1039 1039 1030 1039 1030 1 st EAS or EBS Message 1042 1042 1042 1030 1042 1030 2nd Protective Action Decision:
After Action Report/Improvement Plan                                                   Seabrook Station This page is intentionally blank.
1115 1226 1115 1226 1112 2nd Siren Activation 1121 1155 1121 1110 1121 1112 2nd EAS or EBS Message 1124 1158 1124 1110 1124 1112 3rd Protective Action Decision:
132}}
1139 N/A 1230 1144 3rd Siren Activation 1145 1234 1155 1149 1153 N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1155 1237 1158 1149 1158 1144 4th Protective Action Decision:
1255 N/A N/A N/A 4th Siren Activation 1234 1310 1234 N/A 1234 1225 4th EAS or EBS Message 1237 1313 1237 N/A 1237 1-225 5th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation 1310 1310 N/A N/A 1303 5th EAS or EBS Message 1313 1313 N/A N/A 1303 6th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A KI Administration Decision:
1139 1144 1152 1149 1135 1148 121 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 -DATE: 2012-04-18, Exercise Timeline SITE: Seabrook Station, NH 0 U U 0 Eergency Classification Level or >0 SEvent a<Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0837 N/A 0838 0837 0835 0835 Site Area Emergency 1000 1014 N/A 1014 1016 1014 1014 General Emergency 1115 1123 N/A 1133 1136 1133 1136 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1129 1147 N/A 1150 1148 1145 1136 Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated____________
Facility Declared Operational 0855 N/A 0907 0900 0945 0914 Declaration of State of Emergency 1006 N/A 0956 1006 1007 1012 Exercise Terminated 1338 N/A 1331 1215 1337 1339 Early Precautionary Actions: 1032 N/A N/A 0938 0938 1000.st Protective Action Decision:
1032 N/A 1030 1030 1112 1145 1 st Siren Activation 1039 N/A 1039 1039 1039 1155 1 st EAS or EBS Message 1042 N/A 1042 1042 1042 1158 2nd Protective Action Decision:
1114 N/A N/A 1111 N/A 1301 2nd Siren Activation 1121 N/A 1121 1121 1121 1310 2nd EAS or EBS Message 1124 N/A 1124 1124 1124 1313 3rd Protective Action Decision:
1150 N/A N/A N/A N/A ______3rd Siren Activation 1155 N/A 1155 1155 1155 N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1158 N/A 1158 1158 1158 N/A 4th Protective Action Decision:
1225 N/A N/A N/A N/A _____4th Siren Activation 1234 N/A N/A N/A 1310 _____4th EAS or EBS Message 1237 N/A N/A N/A 1313 _____5th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A ______5th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message ______ N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A KI Administration Decision:
1 1147 N/A 1148 1148 1145 1201 122 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 -Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH 0 U Em.er.gency Classification Level or L ..Event" 1- Z .Unusual Event N/A N/A .N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0837 0839 0835 0837 N/A 0906 Site Area Emergency 1000 1027 1019 1010 1015 N/A 1027 GeneralEmergency 1115 1136 1136 1132 1135 N/A 1137 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1129 1152 1146 1205 1145 N/A N/A Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated
_____Facility Declared Operational 0912 0918 0909 1000 N/A 0945 Declaration of State of Emergency 1027 1008 1000 N/A N/A 1007 Exercise Tenrinated 1338 N/A 1339 1340 N/A 1329 Early Precautionary Actions: 1000 111l 1003 1018 N/A 0940 1st Protective Action Decision:
1031 1147 1148 N/A 1Ist Siren Activation 1039 N/A 1039 1039 N/A Icst EAS or EBS Message 1042 N/A 1042 1042 N/A 2nd Protective Action Decision:
1152 N/A 1237 1229 N/A 2nd Siren Activation 1155 1ll5 1121 1155 N/A 2nd EAS or EBS Message 1158 N/A 1124 1158 N/A 3rd Protective Action Decision:
1152 N/A N/A N/A N/A 3rd Siren Activation 1234 1226 1155 1234 N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1237 N/A 1158 1237 N/A 4th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A 4th Siren Activation N/A 1234 1310 N/A 4th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1237 1313 N/A 5th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation N/A 1310 N/A N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1313 N/A N/A 6th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A KI Administration Decision:
1152 1146 1216 1200 N/A 123 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 -DATE: 2012-04-18, Exercise Timeline SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Emergency Classification Level or >.Event C.'o ... :. ..J 2>Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 N/A 0835 N/A 0845 0838 0838 Site Area Emergency 1000 N/A 1013 N/A 1016 1009 1018 General Emergency 1115 N/A 1133 N/A 1136 1132 1 1133 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1129 N/A 1211 N/A 1146 N/A 1145 Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated
_______________________
Facility Declared Operational N/A 0840 N/A 0856 0958 0943 Declaration of State of Emergency N/A 1003 N/A 0956 1010 0956 Exercise Terminated N/A 1327 N/A 1337 1337 1337 Early Precautionary Actions: N/A 0915 N/A 0943 0940 N/A-st Protective Action Decision:
N/A 1121 N/A 1030 N/A N/A I1st Siren Activation N/A 1033 N/A 1039 N/A 1039 1 st EAS or EBS Message N/A 1039 N/A 1042 N/A 1042 2nd Protective Action Decision:
N/A 1145 N/A 1115 N/A N/A 2nd Siren Activation N/A 1115 N/A 1121 N/A 1121 2nd EAS or EBS Message N/A 1121 N/A 1124 N/A 1124 3rd Protective Action Decision:
N/A ______ N/A 1145 N/A N/A 3rd Siren Activation N/A 1150 N/A 1155 N/A 1155 3rd EAS or EBS Message N/A 1158 N/A 1158 N/A 1158 4th Protective Action Decision:
N/A ______ N/A 122 4 N/A N/A 4th Siren Activation N/A 1234 N/A 1234 N/A 1234 4th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1237 N/A 1237 N/A 1237 5th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation N/A 0835 N/A 1310 N/A 1310 SthEASror EBSmMessage N/A N/A 1313 N/A 1313 6th Protective Action Decision:
N/A 1133 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A 1211 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IsKI Administration Decision:
N/A 1211 N/A 1145 N/A 1149 124 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 -DATE: 2012-04-18, Exercise Timeline SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Emergency Classification Level or 0 U 0 Eveits C/Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0823 0823 0830 0831 0832 0832 Site Area Emergency 1000 1008 1003 1018 102'2 1031 1030 General Emergency 1115 1128 1118 1135 1145 1148 1 1148 Simulated Rad.Release Started 1129 1148 1133 1129 1145 1148 1148 Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated____________
______ ______Facility Declared Operational 0845 0905 0846 0849 0900 0925 Declaration of State of Emergency 0920 1003 0920 1040 0934 0942 Exercise Terminated 1335 1334 1345 1345 1347 N/A Early Precautionary Actions: 0920 0928 0920 0928 0920 0940 1 st Protective Action Decision:
1029 1111 N/A 1112 N/A 1 st Siren Activation 1039 1039 1039 1039 1039 1037 1 st EAS or BBS Message 1042 1042 1042 1042 1042 1037 2nd Protective Action Decision:
1109 1136 1106 1110 1140 1119 2nd Siren Activation 1121 1121 1121 1121 1121 1121 2nd EAS or ElS Message 1124 1124 1124 1124 1124 1124 3rd Protective Action Decision:
1139 1150 N/A N/A 3rd Siren Activation 1155 1155 1155 1155 1155 1155 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1158 1158 1158 1158 1158 1158 4th Protective Action Decision:
1228 N/A 1314 4th Siren Activation 1234 1234 1234 N/A 1310 4th EAS or EBS Message 1237 1237 1237 N/A 1313 5th Protective Action Decision:
1307 N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation 1310 1310 1310 N/A N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message _ ____ 1313 1313 1313 N/A N/A 6th Protective Action Decision:
___________
_____ N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation
___________
_____ N/A N/A N/A 16th EAS or EBS Message ___________
_____ N/A N/A N/A IKI Administration Decision:
1128 1118 1135 1145 1140 1147 125 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 -Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH UU Emergency Classification Level or :i. " Event U ..... ... , ... ..... Z.: ...."...... ..Unusuaml Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0829 0831 0833 0917 0838 Site Area Emergency 1000 1014 1014 1015 1016 1020 General Emergency 1115 1146 1144 1145 1139 1136 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1129 1147 1129 1129 1139 N/A Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A 1500 N/A Terminated Facility Declared Operational 0903 0853 0855 0930 0900 Declaration of State of Emergency 0935 0943 0920 1135 1139 Exercise Terminated N/A 1347 N/A 1400 1420 Early Precautionary Actions: 0930 0930 0920 1017 1049 1 st Protective Action Decision:
1110 1111 1145 N/A N/A I st Siren Activation 1121 1039 1039 N/A N/A 1st EAS or EBS Message 1124 1042 1042 N/A N/A 2nd Protective Action Decision:
1150 1146 1215 N/A N/A 2nd Siren Activation 1155 1121 1121 N/A N/A 2nd EAS or EBS Message 1158 1124 1124 N/A N/A 3rd Protective Action Decision:
1221 1238 N/A N/A 3rd Siren Activation 1234 1155 1155 N/A N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1237 1158 1158 N/A N/A 4th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A 4th Siren Activation N/A 1234 1234 N/A N/A 4th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1237 1237 N/A N/A 5th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation N/A 1310 N/A N/A N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1313 N/A N/A N/A 6th Protective Action Decision:
N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A KI Administration Decision:
1146 1146 1145 1245 1043 126 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station APPENDIX D: EXERCISE EVALUATORS AND TEAM LEADERS 127 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH LOCATION EVALUATOR AGENCY NH State Emergency Operations Center Patricia Foster FEMA RI Michael Shuler FEMA RIII Kim Wood ICFI NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility *Thomas Essig ICFI John McGough FEMA -RI NH State Police Communications Center, NIH State Warning Point Kim Wood ICFI Rockingham County Dispatch Center *Paul Ringheiser ICFI Cheryl Weaver ICF NH (SS) Joint Infornation Center *Paul Nied ICFI NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-i *Johanna Berkey FEMA RX NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 *Martin Vyenielo FEMA RIIl Massachusetts State Emergency Operations Center Ronald Biernacki ICFI Brian Kennedy FEMA William Palmer ICF MA (SS) Emergency Operations Facility Brad McRee ICF*Roy Smith ICFI MA Region I EOC Terry Sheehan DOT*David White ICFI MA (SS) Joint Information Center Paul Nied ICFI MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-I *Michael Howe FEMA HQ MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 *Marcy Campbell ICFI MA Media Center *Meg Swearingen ICFI MA State Laboratory
-Day 2 *Michael Howe FEMA HQ NH State Emergency Operations Center Day 2 *Michael Shuler FEMA RIII Bill Webb FEMA RX NH -Field Sampling Team -1 *Martin Vyenielo FEMA RIII NH -Field Sampling Team -2 *Johanna Berkey FEMA RX NH State Laboratory
-Day 2 *Daryl Thome ICFI ME State Emergency Operations Center *Robert Swartz FEMA RI ME State Emergency Operations Center -Day 2 Richard McPeak ICFI*Robert Swartz FEMA RI ME Incident Field Office ME Incident Field Office -Day 2 ME Field Sampling Team -I *Reggie Rodgers ICFI ME State Health and Environmental Testing Laboratory
*Kent Tosch ICFI NH State EOC Local Liaison Bridget Ahlgrim FEMA HQ Brad DeKorte FEMA RVI Rebecca Fontenot FEMA HQ Rochester Reception Center Dosimetry Issue and Briefing, Emergency Helen LaForge FEMA RI Worker Dosimeter Brentwood Local EOC Michael Petullo ICFI*Mario Vigliani ICFI East Kingston Local EOC Deborah Blunt ICFI*Bruce Swiren ICFI Exeter Local EOC Ann Mulvaney FEMA RI_ *Clayton Spangenberg ICFI Greenland Local EOC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI 128 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Hampton Local EOC Betsy Snell FEMA -RI*Kent Tosch ICFI Hampton Falls Local EOC *Laura Forrest FEMA RII Thomas Gahan ICFI Kensington Local EOC Patrick Taylor ICFI*Miriatn Weston FEMA RII Kingston NiH Local EOC Gary Bolender ICFI*Brian Hasemann FEMA RII New Castle Local EOC Henry Christiansen ICFI*Patricia Mason FEMA RII Newfields Local EOC Jon Christiansen ICFI*Anthony Honnellio EPA Newton Local EOC Mark Dalton ICFI*Linda Gee FEMA RVI North Hampton Local EOC Joseph Lischinsky ICFI*Timothy Pflieger FEMA RVI Portsmouth Local EOC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Rye Local EOC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Seabrook Local EOC *Patricia Gardner FEMA -HQ Gary Goldberg ICFI South Hampton Local EOC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Stratham Local EOC Nulise Francois Wanda Gaudet FEMA -RI*Helen LaForge FEMA RI Amesbury Local EOC *Richard Echavarria FEMA RIX Wes Ryals ICF Merrimac Local EOC Elena Joyner FEMA RIX*Daryl Thome ICFI Newbury Local EOC *Rosemary Samsel ICFI Alberto Sifuentes FEMA RIX Newburyport Local EOC Paul Anderson FEMA RIX*David Petta ICFI Salisbury Local EOC *Ingrid Bruns FEMA RI Danny Loomis ICFI West Newbury Local EOC *Larry Broockerd FEMA HQ Roger Jobe ICFI Amesbury:
Amesbury Schools Superintendent
*John Rice FEMA RI Pentucket Schools Superintendent
*John Rice FEMA RI ME York County EOC Richard Fournier ICFI*Bonnie Sheffield FEMA -RVIII Adeline C. Marston School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Coorperative Middle School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Heronfield Academy *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Winnacunnet High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Seabrook Elementary School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Lincoln Street Elementary School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Swasey Central School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Kensignton Elementary School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Sanborn Region High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Memorial School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Exeter High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI 129 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Hampton Academy *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI North Hampton School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Greenland Central School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI New Franklin School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Lister Academy *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Amesbury:
Amesbury Academy Charter *John Rice FEMA RI Amesbury:
Cashman School *John Rice FEMA RI Amesbury:
Little Sprouts Daycare *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Amesbury:
Sparhawk Lower School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Methuen: Timony School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Amesbury:Camp Bauercrest
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Residential Options *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newbury: Triton Supt. *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Coastal Alternative School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Community Action-Head Start *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI W. NewburyPathways for Learning *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI West Newbury: Learning Tree Preschool
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Tewksbury High School *John Rice FEMA RI Salisbury:
New Beginnings Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Kinder Care Daniel Lucy *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Nock Middle School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Newburyport Supt. *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Kinder Care Low Street *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Mrs. Murrays Preschool
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Newburyport High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Newburyport Residence
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Newburyport Montessori
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI A Place to Grow *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Rockingham County Nursing Home *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Polka Dots Childcare Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Appleseeds Day Care *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Donna Clarke Family Day Care *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Stratham Circle Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Great Bay Kid's Company *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newton Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Over the Rainbow *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI My First School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Imprints Day School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Kids Stop Inc. *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Ctr *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI The Ridge at Riverwoods
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI DeColores Childrens Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Clipper Habor of Portsmouth CRC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI The Childrens Garden *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Edgewood Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Edgewood Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI 130 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Kindercare Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Kathleen Tostenson
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Pats Family Child Care *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Live Y'ers *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Newburyport:
Inn Street Montessori
*John Rice FEMA RI Rochester Local EOC Barton Freeman FEMA RIII*Katherine Nishihara FEMA RIX Dover Local EOC James Chemiack*Edward Diaz FEMA RV Manchester Local EOC Brian Collins FEMA -RI*Kenneth Wierman FEMA HQ Manchester MHS Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring Rochester Reception Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Rochester Reception Center Vehicles Don Carlton FEMA RI Rochester Reception Center Registration Helen LaForge FEMA RI Manchester HS Reception Center Operations
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Manchester Reception Center Dosimetry Helen LaForge FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon Don Carlton FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Female Mon/Decon Taneeka Hollins FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Registration Barbara Thomas FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Male Decon Robert Swartz FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring John Rice FEMA RI Rochester Reception Center Portal and Secondary Monitoring Ingrid Bruns FEMA RI Rochester Reception Center Male Monitoring/Decon Robert Swartz FEMA RI Rochester Reception Center Female Monitoring/Decon Taneeka Hollins FEMA RI Rockingham County State Transportation Staging Area Ingrid Bruns FEMA RI Helen LaForge FEMA RI*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Barbara Thomas FEMA RI Wentworth Douglas Hospital *Helen LaForge FEMA RI Elliot Hospital *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Lexington:
Minuteman High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Methuen: Methuen High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Wilmington:
Shriner's Auditorium
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI Wakefield:
Wakefield High School *John Rice FEMA RI MA KIDispensing Site-Danvers
*Melissa Savilonis FEMA -RI MA State Police Assembly-Troop A *John Rice FEMA RI Methuen: Marash Grammer School *John Rice FEMA I:
* Team Leader, 131 Unclassified Radiological EmergenO,&#xfd;-Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station This page is intentionally blank.132}}

Latest revision as of 13:14, 6 February 2020

Transmittal of Final Report for Seabrook Station Plume & Post Plume Biennial Exercise, Conducted on April 17-18, 2012
ML12258A200
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/01/2012
From: Colman S
US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
To: Bill Dean
NRC Region 1
References
Download: ML12258A200 (136)
v • d • e


Text

U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region I 99 High St., 5 th Floor Boston, MA 02110-2320 ZY FEMA August 1, 2012 Mr. Bill Dean Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415

Dear Mr. Dean:

Enclosed is a copy of the Final Report for the Seabrook Station Plume and Post Plume Biennial Exercise, conducted on April 17-18, 2012.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of New Hampshire, State of Maine and local emergency response organizations successfully demonstrated their capabilities to implement their off-site radiological emergency response plans and procedures based on the evaluation of this exercise by a team of Federal evaluators with final determinations made by the Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) Chair.

There were four Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) as a result of this exercise. There were no deficiencies. There are four open ARCAs as a result of this exercise: one due to Emergency Operations Facility not providing adequate instructions to Field Teams. The three remaining ARCA's at Kingston, Newfields and Portsmouth Emergency Operations Centers were that the Radiological Officers failed to provide adequate dosimetery briefings to Emergency Workers. State and local preparedness remains adequate to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of the Seabrook Station and provides reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can be taken off-site in the event of a radiological emergency.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (617) 832-4731, or John Rice at (617) 956-7509.

www.fema.gov VIM

U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region I 99 High St., 5t Floor Boston, MA 02110-2320

~FEI4A.

Sincerely, Steve L. Colman Regional Assistance Committee Chair cc: NRC Headquarters Document Control Desk Nancy McNamara, Liaison Officer, NRC Region I Steve Colman, Branch Chief, FEMA RI Enclosure www.fema.gov

Seabrook Station After Action Report/

Improvement Plan Exercise Date - April 18, 2012 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program

.. FE-.A Published August 01, 2012

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station This page is intentionally blank.

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Seabrook Station After Action Report/Improvement Plan Published August 01, 2012 Contents Executive Summary 8 Section 1: Exercise Overview 9 1.1 Exercise Details 9 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership 9 1.3 Participating Organizations 10 Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 11 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design 11 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities 11 2.3 Scenario Summary 11 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 12 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results 12 3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation 12 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 41 3.3.1 Massachusetts Jurisdictions 41 3.3.1.1 Massachusetts State Emergency Operations Center 41 3.3.1.2 MA Region I EOC 41 3.3.1.3 MA (SS) Joint Information Center 41 3.3.1.4 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1 42 3.3.1.5 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 42 3.3.1.6 MA Media Center 42 3.3.1.7 MA State Laboratory - Day 2 43 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions 43 3.3.2.1 Amesbury Local EOC 43 3.3.2.2 Merrimac Local EOC 43 3.3.2.3 Newbury Local EOC 44 3.3.2.4 Newburyport Local EOC 44 1

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.5 Salisbury Local EOC 44 3.3.2.6 West Newbury Local EOC 45 3.3.2.7 Amesbury: Amesbury Schools Superintendent 45 3.3.2.8 Pentucket Schools Superintendent 45 3.3.2.9 Amesbury: Amesbury Academy Charter 46 3.3.2.10 Amesbury: Cashman School 46 3.3.2.11 Amesbury: Little Sprouts Daycare 46 3.3.2.12 Amesbury: Sparhawk Lower School 47 3.3.2.13 Methuen: Timony School 47 3.3.2.14 Amesbury:Camp Bauercrest 47 3.3.2.15 Newburyport: Residential Options 48 3.3.2.16 Newbury: Triton Supt. 48 3.3.2.17 Newburyport: Coastal Alternative School 48 3.3.2.18 Newburyport: Community Action-Head Start 49 3.3.2.19 W. NewburyPathways for Learning 49 3.3.2.20 West Newbury: Learning Tree Preschool 49 3.3.2.21 Tewksbury High School 50 3.3.2.22 Salisbury: New Beginnings Learning Center 50 3.3.2.23 Newburyport: Kinder Care Daniel Lucy 50 3.3.2.24 Newburyport: Nock Middle School 51 3.3.2.25 Newburyport: Newburyport Supt. 51 3.3.2.26 Newburyport: Kinder Care Low Street 51 3.3.2.27 Newburyport: Mrs. Murrays Preschool 52 3.3.2.28 Newburyport: Newburyport High School 52 3.3.2.29 Newburyport: Newburyport Residence 52 3.3.2.30 Newburyport: Newburyport Montessori 53 3.3.2.31 Newburyport: Inn Street Montessori 53 3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions 53 3.3.3.1 Lexington: Minuteman High School 53 3.3.3.2 Methuen: Methuen High School 54 3.3.3.3 Wilmington: Shriner's Auditorium 54 3.3.3.4 Wakefield: Wakefield High School 54 2

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.3.5 MA KIDispensing Site-Danvers 55 3.3.3.6 MA State Police Assembly- Troop A 55 3.3.3.7 Methuen: Marash Grammer School 55 3.3.4 Maine Jurisdictions 55 3.3.4.1 ME State Emergency Operations Center 56 3.3.4.2 ME State Emergency Operations Center - Day 2 56 3.3.4.3 ME Incident Field Office 56 3.3.4.4 ME Incident Field Office - Day 2 56 3.3.4.5 ME Field Sampling Team - 1 56 3.3.4.6 ME State Health and Environmental Testing 59 Laboratory 3.3.5 Risk Jurisdictions 60 3.3.5.1 ME York County EOC 61 3.3.6 New Hampshire Jurisdictions 61 3.3.6.1 NH State Emergency Operations Center 61 3.3.6.2 NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility 62 3.3.6.3 NH State Police Communications Center, NH State 63 Warning Point 3.3.6.4 Rockingham County Dispatch Center 63 3.3.6.5 NH (SS) Joint Information Center 64 3.3.6.6 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1 64 3.3.6.7 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 65 3.3.6.8 MA (SS) Emergency Operations Facility 65 3.3.6.9 NH State Emergency Operations Center Day 2 66 3.3.6.10 NH - Field Sampling Team - 1 66 3.3.6.11 NH - Field Sampling Team - 2 67 3.3.6.12 NH State Laboratory - Day 2 68 3.3.6.13 NH State EOC Local Liaison 69 3.3.6.14 Rochester Reception Center Dosimetry Issue and 69 Briefing, Emergency Worker Dosimeter 3.3.7 Risk Jurisdictions 69 3.3.7.1 Brentwood Local EOC 69 3.3.7.2 East Kingston Local EOC 71 3

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.3 Exeter Local EOC 71 3.3.7.4 Greenland Local EOC 71 3.3.7.5 Hampton Local EOC 72 3.3.7.6 Hampton Falls Local EOC 72 3.3.7.7 Kensington Local EOC 72 3.3.7.8 Kingston NH Local EOC 73 3.3.7.9 New Castle Local EOC 76 3.3.7.10 Newfields Local EOC 76 3.3.7.11 Newton Local EOC 77 3.3.7.12 North Hampton Local EOC 78 3.3.7.13 Portsmouth Local EOC 78 3.3.7.14 Rye Local EOC 81 3.3.7.15 Seabrook Local EOC 81 3.3.7.16 South Hampton Local EOC 81 3.3.7.17 Stratham Local EOC 83 3.3.7.18 Adeline C. Marston School 84 3.3.7.19 Coorperative Middle School 85 3.3.7.20 Heronfield Academy 85 3.3.7.21 Winnacunnet High School 85 3.3.7.22 Seabrook Elementary School 86 3.3.7.23 Lincoln Street Elementary School 86 3.3.7.24 Swasey Central School 86 3.3.7.25 Kensignton Elementary School 87 3.3.7.26 Sanborn Region High School 87 3.3.7.27 Memorial School 87 3.3.7.28 Exeter High School 88 3.3.7.29 Hampton Academy 88 3.3.7.30 North Hampton School 88 3.3.7.31 Greenland Central School 89 3.3.7.32 New Franklin School 89 3.3.7.33 Lister Academy 89 3.3.7.34 A Place to Grow 90 4

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.35 Rockingham County Nursing Home 90 3.3.7.36 Polka Dots Childcare Center 90 3.3.7.37 Appleseeds Day Care 91 3.3.7.38 Donna Clarke Family Day Care 91 3.3.7.39 Stratharn Circle Learning Center 91 3.3.7.40 Great Bay Kid's Company 92 3.3.7.41 Newton Learning Center 92 3.3.7.42 Over the Rainbow 92 3.3.7.43 My First School 93 3.3.7.44 Imprints Day School 93 3.3.7.45 Kids Stop Inc. 93 3.3.7.46 Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Ctr 94 3.3.7.47 The Ridge at Riverwoods 94 3.3.7.48 DeColores Childrens Center 94 3.3.7.49 Clipper Habor of Portsmouth CRC 95 3.3.7.50 The Childrens Garden 95 3.3.7.51 Edgewood Center 95 3.3.7.52 Edgewood Learning Center 96 3.3.7.53 Kindercare Learning Center 96 3.3.7.54 Kathleen Tostenson 96 3.3.7.55 Pats Family Child Care 97 3.3.7.56 Live Y'ers 97 3.3.8 Support Jurisdictions 97 3.3.8.1 Rochester Local EOC 98 3.3.8.2 Dover Local EOC 98 3.3.8.3 Manchester Local EOC 98 3.3.8.4 Manchester MHS Reception Center Portal & 98 Secondary Monitoring 3.3.8.5 Rochester Reception Center 99 3.3.8.6 Rochester Reception Center Vehicles 99 3.3.8.7 Rochester Reception Center Registration 99 3.3.8.8 Manchester HS Reception Center Operations 100 5

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8.9 Manchester Reception Center Dosimetry 100 3.3.8.10 Manchester Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon 100 3.3.8.11 Manchester Reception Center Female Mon/Decon 102 3.3.8.12 Manchester Reception Center Registration 102 3.3.8.13 Manchester Reception Center Male Decon 102 3.3.8.14 Manchester Reception Center Portal & Secondary 104 Monitoring 3.3.8.15 Rochester Reception Center Portal and Secondary 105 Monitoring 3.3.8.16 Rochester Reception Center Male Monitoring/Decon 105 3.3.8.17 Rochester Reception Center Female 108 Monitoring/Decon 3.3.8.18 Rockingham County State Transportation Staging 108 Area 3.3.8.19 Wentworth Douglas Hospital 109 3.3.8.20 Elliot Hospital 109 Section 4: Conclusion 110 Appendix A: Improvement Plan 111 Appendix B: Best Practices 119 Appendix C: Exercise Timeline 121 Appendix D: Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders 127 6

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station This page is intentionally blank.

7

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

On April 17, 2012 and April 18, 2012, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS),

Preparedness Directorate, National Preparedness Division, Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region I conducted an exercise in the 10-mile plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone and the 50-mile ingestion exposure pathway emergency planning zone around the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. Interviews and out-of-sequence demonstrations for schools, other special facilities, and reception, monitoring, and decontamination centers (as outlined in this report) were conducted within 60 days of the exercise. The purpose of the exercise and out-of-sequence activities was to assess the level of State and local preparedness in responding to a radiological emergency. This exercise was held in accordance with FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans (RERP) and procedures.

DHS wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals in The State of New Hampshire, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Maine, local communities, and private and volunteer organizations that participated in this exercise.

Protecting the public health and safety is the full-time job of some of the exercise participants and an additional assigned responsibility for others. Still others have willingly sought this responsibility by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities.

Cooperation and teamwork of all the participants were evident during this exercise.

This report contains the final evaluation of the biennial exercise and the out-of-sequence activities.

8

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW 1.1 Exercise Details Exercise Name Seabrook Station Type of Exercise Ingestion Exercise Date April 18, 2012 Program Department of Homeland Security/FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Scenario Type Radiological Emergency 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership Steve Colman RAC Chair FEMA - Region One - REP Branch REP Branch Chief 99 High Street, Fifth Floor Boston, Massachusetts, 02110 617-832-4731 Steve. Colman@dhs.gov John Rice Senior Technological Hazards Specialist FEMA - Region One - REP Branch Senior Technological Hazards Specialist 99 High Street, Fifth Floor 9

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Boston, Massachusetts, 02110 617-956-7509 John.Rice@dhs.gov Melissa Savilonis Site Specialist FEMA - Region One - REP Branch Technological Hazards Specialist 99 High Street, Fifth Floor Boston, Massachusetts, 02110 617-956-7559 Melissa. Savilonis@dhs.gov 1.3 Participating Organizations Agencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the Seabrook Station exercise:

10

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN

SUMMARY

2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design The FEMA Region I evaluated the exercise on April 17, 2012 and April 18, 2012, to assess the capabilities of local emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERPs) and procedures to protect the public health and safety during a radiological emergency involving Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. The purpose of this report is to present the results and findings on the performance of the offsite response organizations (OROs) during a simulated radiological emergency in the HSEEP format.

2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities 2.3 Scenario Summary The exercise scenario was developed to evaluate the response of the exercise participants to a radiological emergency. The scenario is listed in Appendix: Exercise Plan.

11

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results This section contains the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the April 17, 2012 and April 18, 2012 Ingestion Plume Exercise, conducted to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of State and local governments in the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station 10-Mile and 50-Mile Emergency Planning Zone.

Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated on its demonstration of criteria contained in the exercise evaluation areas as outlined in the federal Register, Volume 67, No. 80 "FEMA -

Radiological Emergency Preparedness: Exercise Evaluation Methodology" (April 25, 2002).

Detailed information on the evaluation area criteria and the extent-of-play agreements for the drill are included as appendices to this report.

3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation The matrix presented in the table on following pages presents the status of all exercise evaluation area criteria that were scheduled for demonstration during the drill by all participating jurisdictions and functional entities. Exercise criteria are listed by number, and the demonstration status of those criteria are indicated by the use of the following letters:

M - Met (No Deficiency or ARCAs assessed and no unresolved ARCAs from prior exercise) A -

ARCAs assessed or unresolved ARCAs from previous exercises D - Deficiency assessed P - Plan Issues N - Not Demonstrated 12

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (14 pages)

DATE: 2012-04-18 0 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH . "

M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated C L n V Ln Emergency OperationsManagement . . ..

Mobilization lal M M M M M M M M MM M Facilities IbI M M Direction and Control lcl M M M M M M Communications Equipment Idl M M M M M M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M M M M M ProtetiveAction Decision Making :

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl M M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 M PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional 2cl M M M M needs Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return Protective Action lmplmrnentation Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M M P M M M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl M M M M M Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M M M M M M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return 3fl Decisions Field Measurement and Analysis RESERVED 4al P M Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 A Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 M P Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4c 1 Emergency Notifi~atirn and Public Info Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al M M RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and.Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl M M M M M M Support Operations/Facilities .

Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6a1 13

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bl and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dl 14

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 2/14)

DATE: 2012-04-18 p, U o SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Q W W, W0 M

M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not 0 0 Demonstrated E -

Emergency Operation".Mariagement,:.>/:: . ... ..

Mobilization lal M M M M M M M M M M M Facilities IbI M Direction and Control lct M M MIM M M MIM M Communications Equipment ldl M M MIM M M MMM M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M M M M Protective Action Decision Making .

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional 2cl M M M M M M M M needs Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2d I Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return Protective.Action Implementation Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M P M A M M A M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl M M M M M M M M M M M Implementation ofTraffic and Access Control 3d2 M M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return 3fl Decisions Field.MNasu**mcnt and Analysisi ., .:...

RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4b]

Laboratory Operations 4c I EmergencyNotfifcati*"nand PublicInfo ..

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5b] M M M M M M M M M M M Monort ipe.aDiontamin . R.g,,..atio.

Riaies " Evacuees ,. .

  • Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 16al 15

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6b]

and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c 1 Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6d]

16

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 3/14) 0 DATE: 2012-04-18 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH 0 W.

M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not 0 U Demonstrated W iUU )C

~- ~ ~j

.~ U CL) Cd C) a 0 0 Emergency Operations Management * . . C;; .... "A Mobilization lal M M M M M IM M M M Facilities lbl M I I Direction and Control lcI M IM M M M M M M Communications Equipment Idl M M M M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M Protective Action Decision Making - ....

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2a1 M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl M M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 M PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2cl M M M Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return Protective Action Implementation :.

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M P M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl M P M M M M M Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M M M M M M M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e1 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation. Reentry, and Return Decisions 3f1 lField Measurement and Analyis RESERVED 4a I Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 M Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4c I Emergency Notificationand Public Info Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a] M RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl M M M M M M M Support Operations/Facilities. " '..  !L 17

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bI and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dl 18

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 4/14)

DATE: 2012-04-18 . 0 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not W. -

Demonstrated Cn .

< UE U' Emergency Operations Management ... . . .

Mobilization lal M M M M M M M M M M Facilities 1b 1 Direction and Control Icl M M M M M M Communications Equipment Idl M M M M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M M Protective Action Decision Making * . .. *. ..

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b]

Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation........" . . .

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M M M M M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M M M M M M access/functional needs I I Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl M M M M M M Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M M M M M M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation. Reentry, and Return Decisions 3f1 FieId Measurement and Analysis . ..  : . ... ._ _."

RESERVED 4al M M _

Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 M M _

Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4c I EmergencY Notification and Public Info. . . ."

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl M M M M M M Support Operations/Facilities "

Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al 19

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bl and Vehicles

.Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c 1 Injured Individuals 6dl Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated 20

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 5/14) r -IC4 _ -* ,4 DATE: 2012-04-18 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH, '

= ' 0 -

M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not En W _ " _

Demonstrated Emergency Operations Manageme3 "  :..  ::. ..  :. . . . . ...

Mobilization lal MIM M Facilities Ib1 M Direction and Control IcI M Communications Equipment Idl M MM M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M P M ProtectiveAction Decision Making M Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al M M M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2c0 Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2d] M M Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el M M Relocation. Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation . ....

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M P M M M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c1 access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl M M Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3el _ M M Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 _ M M Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions 3171_ M M FieldMeasurementand Analysis . . ..

RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4b] M M Laboratory Operations 4c I M M Eirigency Notification and Pifi*iilifnto" Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al M RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5b] M M M M Support Operations/Facilities "

Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6b 1 and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c 1 21

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 16dI I I I I 22

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 6/14)

DATE: 2012-04-18 U E SITE: Seabrook Station, NH c C)

M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: NotoCt, a Demonstrated U - . . .E-Emergency Operations Management e?

Mobilization lal M M M M Facilities lbl M Direction and Control Icl M M M M M Communications Equipment Idl M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M P M M M Protective Action Decision Making .

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2c] M Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return Protective Action Implementation '

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M P M M M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl M IM Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 N Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation. Reentry, and Return Decisions 3fl Field Measureieit and Analysis .

RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bl M Laboratory Operations 4cI M Emergency Notification and Public Info .. . .,. .. .::"::..

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl M 23

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Support Operations/Facilities .

Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al M Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bl M and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c 1 Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dI 24

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 7/14) 0 00 DATE: 2012-04-18 .

SITE: Seabrook Station, NH E 9 .

M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not W W W Demonstrated ,

od c U M U` U U

'Emergency Operations Management Mobilization lal M Facilities IbI M Direction and Control IcI M Communications Equipment IdI M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M Protective.Action Decision Making . . ...

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation. Reentry. and Return Protective Action Implementation .... ...* :  :..

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M M Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c M access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d] M Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions 3f1 FieldMeasurementand Analysis.............. '" "

RESERVED 4a 1 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4c 1 Emierency Notificationand Public Info Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl Support Operations/Facilities . .7.

25

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6a] M M P M MIAIM Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bl p M M and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c 1 Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6d1 M 26

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 8/14)

"a 0.0 0 0 00

.0 DATE: 2012-04-18 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH *

  • E. E M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not '!z Demonstrated U=, " 0 U04 Emergency Operations Management Mobilization lal M M M M M M M M M Facilities IbI Direction and Control Icl Communications Equipment Idl Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel Protective Action Decision Making . .

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b 1 Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2c6 Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2d]

Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return Proteccnve'Action lmplementation :... .. . ....

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3ci access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e 1 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions 3fl Field Medsdrement and Analysis .

RESERVED 4a I Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4c]

Emergency Notification and Public Info Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl Support Operations/Facilities .

27

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bl and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c]1 Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dI M 28

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 9/14) o DATE: 2012-04-18 0 >1 It SITE: Seabrook Station, NH -"

M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not "< E 4 V n Demonstrated 0 = M<

Ma 5 ' 6 - E Emergency Operations Management .  :

Mobilization lal M MIM MIM MI M M M M Facilities IbI Direction and Control Icl Communications Equipment Id1 Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel Protective Action Decision Making Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation ... "..

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3a1 Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e1 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions 3fl Field Meas: ment and.Analysis . . . * .  : ,

RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4b1 Laboratory Operations 4c I EEmergency Notification and Public Info .. . . . . .... "'<* . $'" 4: .. "

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl Support Operations/Facilities .. .

Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al 29

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6b]

and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c I Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6d1 30

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 10/14)

C.

0 o DATE: 2012-04-18 EX, .

SITE: Seabrook Station, NH " = >

M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not -i.

Demonstrated 2 5 E C)

Emergený Operatinis Management Mobilization lal M M M M M M M M M M Facilities 1bi Direction and Control Ic1 Communications Equipment Id1 Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations l el Protective Action.Decision Making ....  :..,... : :i Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b]

Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return Protective Action4rmplementation Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e I Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions 3f.

Field,M'ceasureifient and Anialysis RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bI Laboratory Operations 4c I Emergency Notificati0n.af..Public Info .. l..

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information ~~and

.... ~~~~'.... Instructions for the

~~~~~~~~~~ ':*":Public

  • and the..

Media

.. ".. 5b1.:

  • i!i* * :"*. .  :

Support Operations/Facihtlies * . ...  :

Monitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al 31

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6b]

and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c I Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dl 32

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 11/14)

CIO "a -5 0 -E DATE: 2012-04-18 0 -0 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH -

  • 0
  • M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not -

Demonstrated ., M-.* '

~) U . 0 U

EmergencyOperations Management . ... . . . . .. . . "

Mobilization lal M M M M M M M M M M Facilities lbl Direction and Control 1cl Communications Equipment Id1 Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel Protective Action Decision.Making  :. 4::. .

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b 1 Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2d]

Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation . .

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions 3fl Field Measurementand Analysis ..

RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl EmergencyNotification and Public Info. .. .....

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl Support Operations/Facilities ... i*.... ... ..... .

33

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bI and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cI Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dl 34

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 12/14) o DATE: 2012-04-18 "7 U .o =

SITE: Seabrook Station, NH E M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not o * -. .

Demonstrated E. U * ' 4.

0. OjU 2 Emergenc OperatioinsManagement".:

Mobilization lal M M M M M M M M M M Facilities 1bi Direction and Control Ic1 Communications Equipment I dl Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations l ei Protective, Action Decision Making Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation. Reentry, and Return ProtectiveAction Implementation ..

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M M M IM M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M access/functional needs I Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d 1 Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation. Reentry, and Return Decisions 3fl Field Measurement and:A alysis ..... . .

RESERVED 4a I Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4c]

Emergency Notification arn:Public Info . '

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl 35

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Support Operations/Faciities ' ".

Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bI and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c 1 Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dl 36

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 13/14)

Q

.0 CS

~0 5)

U

~0 04 CS DATE: 2012-04-18 0 SITE: Seabrook Station, NH *0 0

0 E

0 0

0 z 0 5)

  • 0 M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not .0 U
  • 0
5) 0. CS A Cd)

Demonstrated I0 0 C-C 0 0

Cd CS 0 Cd) CS 5)

(U V; 5)

C) 5) 0.

0 ~0 as *0 *0 C1 .0 0 0 Ci)

CS U

  • 0 5) 5) 5)

U

5) 2 0

.0 I-

.0 F-Emergency Operatons Maniagement . . .  : ÷*L:  ::

Mobilization lal M M M M M MIM M M M Facilities Ib1 Direction and Control Ic1 Communications Equipment Idl Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel Protective Action Decision Making "

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b I Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2d]

Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2e]

Relocation, Reentry, and Return Protective'Action

" Ippleen"ation "

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3b] M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M M M access/functional needs I Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d]

Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3eI Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions 3f1 Field Measurement and Analysis .  :

RESERVED 4a 1 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4b]

Laboratory Operations 4c 1 Emergency Notification and Public lnfo.

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 37

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl Support Opeiations/Facilities. ."

Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6b]

and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c I Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6d I 38

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 14/14) 0.

DATE: 2012-04-18 gCa0 SITE: Seabrook Station, NHi- I M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not Q .

Demonstrated U 0 Emergency Oerations Management" """ *"'"*I::  :' :*":" .,*

Mobilization lal M M M M M M M M Facilities lbi Direction and Control Icl Communications Equipment ldl Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel Protective Action Decision Making ,

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dl Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2el Relocation, Reentry, and Return Protective:Acti6n Implementation :::"". . ... .

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cd access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M M access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d]

Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3el Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation. Reentry, and Return Decisions 3fl Field Measurementand Analysis:' "

RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4b1 Laboratory Operations 4c 1 Emergency Notification and Public lnfo Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4 Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl 39

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Suppot* Operaiions/Facilties . : *o,. l.*. . t.:::l ::::~l .]:

Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bl and Vehicles Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c I Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dl 40

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 3.3.1 Massachusetts Jurisdictions 3.3.1.1 Massachusetts State Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.b.1, 2.b.2, 2.c.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.2 MA Region I EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, l.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.3 MA (SS) Joint Information Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None 41

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.4 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, l.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.l,4.a.l,4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.5 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 4.a.1, 4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.6 MA Media Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.1, L.e.l,5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 42

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.1.7 MA State Laboratory - Day 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.e.1,3.a.1,4.c.l.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions 3.3.2.1 Amesbury Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a. l, l.c. 1, l.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. l, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.2 Merrimac Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 43

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.3 Newbury Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. M ET: 1.a.1, I.c.1, 1.d.1, l.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.4 Newburyport Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, l.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.5 Salisbury Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, .c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. l, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 44

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.6 West Newbury Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. M ET: 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.7 Amesbury: Amesbury Schools Superintendent In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.8 Pentucket Schools Superintendent In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 45

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.9 Amesbury: Amesbury Academy Charter In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.10 Amesbury: Cashman School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.11 Amesbury: Little Sprouts Daycare In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 46

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.12 Amesbury: Sparhawk Lower School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.13 Methuen: Timony School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.14 Amesbury:Camp Bauercrest In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 47

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.15 Newburyport: Residential Options In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
y. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.16 Newbury: Triton Supt.

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.17 Newburyport: Coastal Alternative School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 48

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.18 Newburyport: Community Action-Head Start In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.19 W. NewburyPathways for Learning In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.20 West Newbury: Learning Tree Preschool In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 49

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.21 Tewksbury High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.22 Salisbury: New Beginnings Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.23 Newburyport: Kinder Care Daniel Lucy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 50

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.24 Newburyport: Nock Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.25 Newburyport: Newburyport Supt.

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.26 Newburyport: Kinder Care Low Street In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 51

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.27 Newburyport: Mrs. Murrays Preschool In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.28 Newburyport: Newburyport High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.29 Newburyport: Newburyport Residence In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 52

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.2.30 Newburyport: Newburyport Montessori In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.31 Newburyport: Inn Street Montessori In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions 3.3.3.1 Lexington: Minuteman High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 53

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.3.2 Methuen: Methuen High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.3 Wilmington: Shriner's Auditorium In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.4 Wakefield: Wakefield High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 54

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.3.5 MA KIDispensing Site-Danvers In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 3.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.6 MA State Police Assembly- Troop A In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.7 Methuen: Marash Grammer School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 55

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.4 Maine Jurisdictions 3.3.4.1 ME State Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a.1, L.b.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.1, 2.a.1, 3.b.1, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.4.2 ME State Emergency Operations Center - Day 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 2.a. 1, 2.d. 1, 2.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 3.e. 1, 3.e.2, 3.f. 1, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.4.3 ME Incident Field Office In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

3.3.4.4 ME Incident Field Office - Day 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

56

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.4.5 ME Field Sampling Team - 1 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.a.1, 1.c. 1, l.d.1, 3.b. 1, 4.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLANISSUES: 1.e.1,3.a.l.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-lel-P-CRITERION: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, KI, and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations.

CONDITION: The Field Monitoring Team (FMT) did not have a beta gamma survey instrument as called for in Procedure 2.11.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The Eberline RO-2 or equivalent beta gamma survey instrument in the procedure was replaced with a Ludlum 2241-2 with a 44-2 gamma survey probe.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654 H.7, H. 10, and Maine Radiation Control Program Procedure 2.11 dated 12/2011, Revision 12.

EFFECT: Environmental sampling teams do not need a beta gamma survey instrument capability. A gamma survey instrument is sufficient. Hence, for the extent of play in this exercise there is no effect from the procedure non-compliance.

However, if the intent is for the Maine Field Monitoring Team to be equipped to also perform plume tracking then, they need to have a beta gamma survey instrument to perform open and closed window readings. Without this capability the team cannot determine when they are in the plume.

RECOMMENDATION: The Radiation Control Program should update Procedure 2.11 to address the change to the survey equipment for the environmental sampling program. Also, if it is intended that "theFMT perform plume tracking then a beta gamma survey instrument should be included in the kit.

57

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.

CONDITION: Prior Issue 57-06-3al -A-08 was closed and replaced by this planning issue. The original performance issue stated that Members of the Maine Sampling Team from the Department of Health and Human Services wore the permanent record dosimeters (PRDs) they routinely wear, but no PRDs were included in the dosimetry provided with the sampling equipment and supplies or issued to DOA team members prior to their deployment from the State Emergency Operation Center.

The Maine Emergency Management Agency has proposed that the non Radiation Control Program members of the Field Monitoring Team go to the York County EOC and obtain an emergency worker dosimetry packet. York County maintains a stockpile of PRD that they get from the State of New Hampshire.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Permanent record dosimeters for field sampling team members were not included with the sampling equipment and dosimetry. The equipment inventory list in Procedure 2.11, Revision 11 (Attachment 1) lists the quantities of TLDs as "as needed" and notes that dosimetry is stored separately. The person assembling or inventorying the sampling equipment kit may have believed that all members already sampling team members already had PRDs.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654, K.3.a EFFECT: Since the direct reading dosimeters (DRDs) are less accurate than PRDs, and reading exposures below about 100 milliroentgens is difficult using a 0-5 58

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station roentgen (R), members of the field team without PRDs would have a less accurate and incomplete record of their exposure. The DRDs is not an official record of exposure.

RECOMMENDATION: This solution (all non RCP members of the FMT go to York County EOC to obtain dosimetry) needs to be documented in the plan and procedures so that all State Agencies and York County are aware of it.

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 3.a.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-06-3al-A-08 ISSUE: Members of the Maine Sampling Team from the Department of Health and Human Services wore the permanent record dosimeters (PRDs) they routinely wear, but no PRDs were included in the dosimetry provided with the sampling equipment and supplies or issued to DOA team members prior to their deployment from the State Emergency Operation Center.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Maine Emergency Management Agency proposed that the non Radiation Control Program members of the Field Monitoring Team go to the York County EOC and obtain an emergency worker dosimetry packet. York County maintains a stockpile of PRD that they get from the State of New Hampshire. This solution needs to be documented in the plan and procedures so that all State Agencies and York County are aware of it. A new planning issue will be issued and this performance issue will be closed.

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.4.6 ME State Health and Environmental Testing Laboratory In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.e.1,3.a.1,4.c.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None 59

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 3.a.1, 4.c.1.

ISSUE NO.:

ISSUE: (Not found in the database!)

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:

ISSUE NO.: 57-00-3al-A-44 ISSUE:

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Maine HETL corrected their past issue 57-00-3al-A-44 of contamination control of the counter room detectors by covering with clear plastic the inside of the lead caves and over the detector heads.

ISSUE NO.: 57-00-4cl-A-42 ISSUE:

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Maine HETL corrected their past issue 57-00-4cl-A-42 of insufficient leak testing of the Direct Reading Dosimeters used at the HETL. The HETL now uses MGP Instrument DMC 2000S Personal Electronic Dosimeter, calibrated April 9, 2012, for dosimetry alarming and direct readings.

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 60

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.5 Risk Jurisdictions 3.3.5.1 ME York County EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.d.1, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: 3.d.2.
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6 New Hampshire Jurisdictions 3.3.6.1 NH State Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. M ET: 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b. 1, 2.b.2, 2.c. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 5.a. 1, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: l.c.l.

ISSUE NO.: 67-11-1cl-P-01 ISSUE: Some municipalities experienced problems interpreting the content of the emergency status portrayed on 301B Forms sent from the NH State EOC.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: REDEMONSTRATION: The State of New Hampshire successfully redemonstrated the issuance of a properly executed 300B form with appropriate precautionary action, duly reviewed and approved on July 14, 2010, in the New Hampshire State EOC.

61

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.2 NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.b.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 4.a.2.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-4a2-A-CRITERION: Field teams (two or more) are managed to obtain sufficient information to help characterize the release and to control radiation exposure.

CONDITION: The New Hampshire Field Monitoring Team 1(FMT 1) did not receive sufficient direction to support characterization of the release. FMT1 never received direction to find the leading edge of the plume. The sample locations of 3.2, 3.7 and 3.8 provided by the Monitoring Team Coordinator (MTC) to the FMT 1 Team Lead never allowed FMT1 to encounter any reading above background. Both air samples taken by FMT 1 were taken in background areas.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The MTC received conflicting information from the Accident Assessment team at the State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC). The MTC followed the direction for the Accident Assessment team to keep FMT 1 out of the plume.

REFERENCE:

REP Program Manual Pg 11-64 Section f. FMTs will obtain plume-edge measurements. NUREG CRITERION 1.8 Each organization, where appropriate, shall provide methods, equipment, and expertise to make rapid assessments of the actual or potential magnitude and locations of any radiological hazards through liquid or gaseous release pathways. This shall include activation, notification means, field team composition, transportation, communication, monitoring equipment, and estimated deployment times.

EFFECT: Due to the lack of data results above background FMT 1, the MTC did not successfully demonstrate the ability to characterize of the plume edges.

62

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station RECOMMENDATION: The Accident Assessment team and MTC should coordinate.

more effectively to direct both FMTs to identify the leading edges of the plume. The plans and procedures should reflect the need to identify the leading edges of the plume. Identify in the plans and procedures what actually constitutes the leading edges of a plume. For example when FMTs identify dose rates 10 times background this will be considered the leading edge of the plume.

c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.3 NH State Police Communications Center, NH State Warning Point In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, l.d.1, 1.e.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.4 Rockingham County Dispatch Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. M ET: 1.a. 1, l.b. 1, l.c. 1, l.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.d.2, 5.a. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 63

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.6.5 NH (SS) Joint Information Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.6 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1,4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 4.a. 1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-10-4al-P-02 ISSUE: The NH Monitoring Teams' procedures in Section 2 address Instrument Checks for 5 survey instruments, 3 of which were used during the exercise. The instruments used were the Eberline 140, the CDV 718A and the RO-2. The other instruments were the RM-14, the PIC 6 and the CDV 700. The procedure for the instruments has the following statement: "verify that the meter responds to a Cs-137 check source". This statement does not satisfy the source check requirement of REP 14 that there be "a procedure for checking the performance of all monitoring instruments against an appropriate reading or range of readings for an identified check source." Since the CFD 2, the NH Monitoring Teams have implemented a verbal procedure for source checking the instruments, which was demonstrated.

However, due to the lack of a written procedure, the operator had difficulty performing the verbal procedure. The check source used in the verbal procedure was an 8 microcurie Cs-137 source in a plastic dish. Each instrument had a sticky note 64

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station attached with an expected reading. However, the operator did not know whether to measure the source with the cover on or off, and whether to have the source in contact with the detector.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.7 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.a. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 4.a.3.

ISSUE NO.: 57-10-4a3-P-03 ISSUE: Current field team procedures do not require teams to perform radiation surveys during air sampling to ensure that the plume has not shifted during air sampling. During the practice drills it was recommended that the field team procedure (Chapter 4, section 4.4) should be revised to require teams to conduct radiation surveys before, during and at the end of the air sampling period. During the exercise it was observed that the teams did implement the recommendation, but that the procedures were not changed to reflect the new survey procedure.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 65

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.6.8 MA (SS) Emergency Operations Facility In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.b.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 4.a.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.9 NH State Emergency Operations Center Day 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 2.a.1, 2.d.1, 2.e.1, 3.d.1, 3.e.1, 3.e.2, 3.f.1, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.10 NH - Field Sampling Team - 1 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: 3.a.l.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or 66

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.

CONDITION: CONDITION (describe the inadequacy):

Field Sampling Team members were not aware that after the release has been terminated and entry into the intermediate phase, the dose limit reverts from the EPA-400 limits to those of Occupation Radiation Workers which is 5 REM TEDE.

They were also not aware that any exposure accumulated during the emergency phase is not included in the intermediate exposure received.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: POSSIBLE CAUSE (what is responsible):

Plan does not contain the change of the dose limits, nor the exposures received not being additive

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654, K.3.a, b EFFECT: The potential exists for Emergency Workers to exceed the allowable exposure limit for the intermediate phase.

RECOMMENDATION: Update the DPHS plan to state the change in the dose limit for Emergency Workers and include the emergency phase exposure is not included in the intermediate phase exposure received.

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.11 NH - Field Sampling Team - 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None 67

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.12 NH State Laboratory - Day 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.a.1, 4.c.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: L.e.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-lel-P-CRITERION: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, KI, and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations.

CONDITION: Prior to instrument use, no operational checks were performed that used a known source and required an instrument response to be within a prescribed range. Also, there was no label affixed to the instrument that defined an acceptable range for the instrument response to a specific source. This was the situation for each of the seven survey instruments used by Radiochemistry Unit.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The State of New Hampshire Laboratory procedures do not require an operational check using a known source nor a label affixed to the instrument that specifies that the instrument response must fall within the defined range.

REFERENCE:

H. 10 EFFECT: No assurance that the instrument is operating properly RECOMMENDATION: Modify State procedures to require an operational check for laboratory instrumentation prior to use using a known source and a label affixed to the instrument that defines that the instrument response must fall within a specific range.

68

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.13 NH State EOC Local Liaison In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.c.1, 1.d.1,2.c.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.6.14 Rochester Reception Center Dosimetry Issue and Briefing, Emergency Worker Dosimeter In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7 Risk Jurisdictions

.3.3.7.1 Brentwood Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a. 1, l.b. 1, l.c. 1, l.d. 1, L.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None 69

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

d. PLAN ISSUES: 3.a.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.

CONDITION: During the conduct of the Seabrook Station (SS) Exercise on April 17, 2012, the Brentwood New Hamphire Emergency Operations Center (EOC) assigned a Radiological Defense (RADEF) Officer who had never been in the position before.

The RADEF Officer did not understand his role in providing a briefing on dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI)to emergency workers before dispatching them to the field.

He issued the dosimetry and KI without a briefing.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The Radiological Defense (RADEF) Officer lacked the training needed to function in the role of the RADEF Officer.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP 1; Part 0 Radiological Emergency Response Training EFFECT: 1. Emergency Workers could have received unnecessary exposure as a result of a lack of understanding of administrative control levels/turn back dose.

2. Emergency Workers did not understand the health effects of potassium iodide (KI)if allergic, or possibly ingesting the pill without the need to ingest it.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The State of NH Controller in the Brentwood NH Emergency Operations Center (EOC) instructed the RADEF Officer on how to conduct a proper briefing of emergency workers prior to dispatching them to the field.

70

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station The RADEF Officer gave a second briefing to emergency workers and the Evaluator asked questions of two emergency workers (per the extent of play agreement). The briefing was given satisfactorily and both emergency workers correctly responded to a series of questions on the briefing.

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.2 East Kingston Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.3 Exeter Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 71

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.4 Greenland Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.5 Hampton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.6 Hampton Falls Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 72

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.7 Kensington Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, l.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.8 Kingston NH Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 3.a.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.

CONDITION: The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) failed to provide an adequate first dosimetry briefing to emergency workers.

At 1130, during the Site Area Emergency (SAE) Emergency Classification Level (ECL) the RADEF Officer performed an Emergency Worker (EW) dosimetry briefing for three ambulance workers at the Kingston EOC. After this briefing, two of the EW were interviewed to determine their basic knowledge of radiation exposure limits, as specified, their knowledge of procedures to monitor and record dosimetry readings, and their ability to manage their radiological exposure. During this interview the EW were not able to correctly identify their first reporting level of 175 73

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station mR, or the subsequent levels to be reported to their supervisor. Using the supplied Emergency Worker Information sheet from the New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Vol.8/Rev. 14 both EW stated that they would report if one of their Direct-Reading Dosimeters (DRDs) were to go off scale. The EWs were issued two DRDs, one 0-200 mR and one 0-20 R.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The briefing provided by the RADEF Officer consisted of his reading from the Emergency Worker Information sheet, New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Vol.8/Rev. 14, 10.8-1 to 10.8-6. It was determined by interview that the RADEF Officer was not specifically trained in this EOC staff position, but was assigned it on his arrival at the EOC. He therefore relied solely on the Emergency Worker Information sheet which was laid out in a way that confused both the RADEF Officer and the EWs as to administrative and turn-back limits.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 J.10.e; K3.a,b; K.4 New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Volume 8, Section 10.8 Kingston Implementing Procedures, Section 3.11 EFFECT: The EW could potentially receive a higher radiation dose than allowed under EPA-400-R-92-001 and New Hampshire Plans and Procedures.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The RADEF Officer received supplemental training from the New Hampshire representative at the EOC and satisfactorily performed a second EW briefing. At 1340, after exercise termination, three EW were interviewed (including one EW from the first briefing/interview) who all demonstrated an adequate knowledge of radiation exposure limits as specified in New Hampshire plans and procedures, their knowledge of procedures to monitor and record dosimetry readings, and their ability to manage their radiological exposure.

c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: 3.a.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and 74

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.

CONDITION: The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) failed to supply potassium iodide (KI) tablets with a briefing to the entire facility staff as per Kingston Plans and Procedures.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: At 1201, Kingston's Emergency Management Director (EMD) confirmed that the State of New Hampshire recommended that all EW take KI within the Emergency Planning Zone. This was relayed to the RADEF Officer who occupies an adjacent room within the facility. The RADEF Officer and his assistants distributed four KI tablets to EOC staff per their plans and procedures. At 1241, the RADEF Officer conducted a KI briefing in the EOC proper and staff was directed to simulate taking one KI tablet.

The EOC is located on the second floor of the Kingston Fire Station. Along with the EOC room, a radio room (with three staff) and EOC Security at the stairs (with two staff) are also located in the facility. After issuance of KI to staff at 1241, again at 1319, and at the end of the exercise at 1339 it was determined by interview that the radio room and security staff had not received KI tablets or been briefed on KI use.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 J.10.e; K3.a,b; K.4 New Hampshire Dosimetry Equipment and Procedures Volume 8, Section 10.8 Kingston Implementing Procedures, Section 3.11 EFFECT: Facility staff not issued KI would be at greater risk of absorbing radiation in their thyroid.

RECOMMENDATION: Procedures should be implemented that require the RADEF Officer and/or the EMD to compare the security sign-in sheet and the Emergency Worker Potassium Iodide User Agreement Form 135A, Volume 8/Rev. 14, to ensure that all facility staff receives KI.

75

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.9 New Castle Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, l.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.10 Newfields Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. M ET: l.a.1, 1.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 3.a.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.

CONDITION: The primary RADEF Officer in the Town of Newfields was unavailable and the alternate RADEF Officer substituted during the exercise. The alternate RADEF Officer was not familiar with zeroing the dosimetry. The Alternate RADEF Office did not brief the officer of the need to contact the officer's immediate supervisor when the 200mR reading was reached. The Alternate RADEF Officer did 76

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station not brief the side effects of Potassium Iodide during the breifing until prompted by another staff member. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not understand the meaning of the 5 R turn back value and did not emphasize the turn back value meaning to the officer.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The alternate RADEF Officer is not called upon to conduct the Radiological Briefing or zero the dosimeters on a regular basis. More Training in this position is required.

REFERENCE:

K.3.a, K.3.b EFFECT: The Emergency Workers dispatched from the Newfields Emergency Operations Center (NEOC) would not be assured that the readings from the Self Reading Dosimeters were accurate. They would not have a clear understanding of their exposure limits and Emergency Workers. If instructed to ingest KI the Emergency Workers would be unaware of possible side effects and allergic reactions.

If the Emergency workers were in a radiation plume they may have received a dose in excess of administrative limits of the ORO.

RECOMMENDATION: The alternate RADEF Officer should be trained annually and participate in all exercises.

c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.11 Newton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None 77

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.12 North Hampton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.13 Portsmouth Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.b. 1, L.e. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 3.a.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.

CONDITION: Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.

The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gave inadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aid 78

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station conflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains all information needed for emergency worker exposure control. The Radiological Officer also skipped important information that emergency workers needed to be briefed on prior to being deployed to the field (the Radiological Officer did not read off the Briefing Form that the State had provided to all EOCs)- the Radiological Officer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOC when the dosimeter reaches IR. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer provided inaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers who may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at a nuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose occupation carries with it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declaration in writing if they are or think that they may be pregnant.

The Radiological Officer also had a Job Aid that conflicted with the Briefing Form that the State provided to the Emergency Operations Center.

The Radiological Officer was also using Rev 13 for Form 305A, which is out of date.

Rev 14 Forms are the most up to date and and FEMA approved forms for emergency workers.

The Emergency Operations Center also had the wrong inventory form for the emergency worker kits. The one provided was out of date.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing, and did not read directly from the briefing form provided by the State.

The RERP for the City of Portsmouth does not require the RADEF Officer to brief the emergency workers. The RADEF Officer's procedure refers to the NHRERP Procedure for Issuing Dosimetry and KI, Volume 8, Section 10.7, which also does not require an emergency worker briefing.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654 FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1 K.3.a, K.3.b Implementing Procedures for EPZ Communities Incident Annex Rev 13 Form 305 A 79

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Radiological Officer Job Aid Radiological Briefing Form EFFECT: The emergency workers could have gone on missions without knowing the proper information for protecting themselves from radiation exposure.

RECOMMENDATION: This previous issue was not corrected.

Training needs to be provided to the Radiological Officer. Rev 13 Forms need to be destroyed. The Job Aid must align with the Incident Annex and Implementing Procedures, as well as the City's Radiological Emergency Response Plan.

c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES- RESOLVED: 3.a.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-10-3al-P-04 ISSUE: Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: This issue was not corrected. It was made into an ARCA.

The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gave inadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aid conflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains all information needed for emergency worker exposure control.

The Radiological Officer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOC when the dosimeter reaches 1R. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer provided inaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers who may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at a nuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose 80

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station occupation carries with it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declaration in writing if they are or think that they may be pregnant.

Furthermore, the Radiological Officer used Rev 13 for Form 305A, and not Rev 14, which is the FEMA approved form for use.

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.14 Rye Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.15 Seabrook Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, l.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1,3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.16 South Hampton Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None 81

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 3.b.1, 3.d.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-10-3b1-P-05 ISSUE: The current version of the Dosimetry-KI Report Form 305A (Rev 14) does not contain the correct number of days to record the ingestion of KI by emergency workers. Rev 14 of the form indicates 10 days for KI ingestion, although Volume 8 of the NH RERP, Dosimetry and KI issuance instructions call for only four days of ingestion. The older Rev 13 of Form 305A, which is still in circulation in some communities, includes the correct record of ingestion for four days.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:

ISSUE NO.: 57-10-3dl-P-06 ISSUE: Issue: 57-10-3dl-?-

Planning Issue CONDITION:

There are discrepancies in the NH Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) as to proper delegation of primary organizational responsibility for implementing traffic control in South Hampton. Volume 41 of the NHRERP, NH Traffic Management Manual states that the State Police have primary responsibility for staffing Traffic Control Points (TCPs) in South Hampton and assigns State resources for this function. This was done because South Hampton has a part time Police Department and cannot ensure adequate resources will be available to staff TCPs during an emergency. However, Volume 36 of the NHRERP, Table 1.6-1 and the South Hampton Police Chief procedure assign traffic control as a local police responsibility, including a step for the local Police Chief to Dispatch his officers to the TCPs.

82

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.17 Stratham Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: 1.d. 1, i.e. 1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-06-ldl-A-06 ISSUE: The Stratham EOC had only two active telephone lines for all incoming and out going calls. These two lines served the 22 people signed into the EOC who were making out going calls. It was discovered no calls could come into the EOC. As a fix one line was designated as an incoming line and one as an outgoing line. However, there were still individuals who tried to call in and, unknown to the EOC, were never able to get through to the EOC.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: This issue was originally cited in 2006, when the EOC was at a prior location by the Police Station and Library. It has since moved to a new building that also houses the Stratham Volunteer Fire Department.

It was mentioned that a request for a third line is in process. They did use six of the Stratham Volunteer Fire Department's commercial landlines. It was mentioned they get billed separately for that. For this criterion, it states primary and back-up operational. That was accomplished.

Note: Additional line(s) would be good so as the primary line was not busy if a second call was coming in, for example by the State.

83

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station ISSUE NO.: 57-10-1el-P-07 ISSUE: No provision has been provided in the plans and/or procedures to ensure that the control permanent record dosimeter (PRD) included with the PRDs is not exposed to radiation fields experienced by emergency workers in the emergency operations center (EOC) from a passing radioactive plume or deposition of radioactivity.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Stratham Radiological Officer used the correct survey meters (CD V-700s)Kit that was labled for the Stratham Emergency Operation Center, identified by "EOC Kit".

The calibration date was current "2012".

ISSUE NO.: 57-10-lel-A-08 ISSUE: Incorrect survey meters (CD V-700s) were used by the Town. The Town used their transportation accident monitoring kit rather than instruments that were issued to the Town specifically for REP. Calibration standards are different for CD V-700 instruments if they are used in a REP situation (annual calibration) versus every four years for transportation accident monitoring. Because the Town used the CD V-700s from the transportation accident monitoring kit in a REP situation, the instruments were not calibrated for use in 2010.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Permanent Record Dosimeters were protected and shielded according to the plan/procedures and the extent of play.

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 84

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.18 Adeline C. Marston School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.19 Coorperative Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.20 Heronfield Academy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 85

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.21 Winnacunnet High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.22 Seabrook Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.23 Lincoln Street Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 86

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.24 Swasey Central School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.25 Kensignton Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.26 Sanborn Region High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 87

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.27 Memorial School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.28 Exeter High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.29 Hampton Academy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 88

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.30 North Hampton School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.31 Greenland Central School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.32 New Franklin School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 89

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.33 Lister Academy In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.34 A Place to Grow In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.35 Rockingham County Nursing Home In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.l,3.b.1,3.c.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 90

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.36 Polka Dots Childeare Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.37 Appleseeds Day Care In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.38 Donna Clarke Family Day Care In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 91

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.39 Stratham Circle Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.40 Great Bay Kid's Company In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.41 Newton Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 92

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.42 Over the Rainbow In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.43 My First School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.44 Imprints Day School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 93

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.45 Kids Stop Inc.

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.46 Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Ctr In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.l.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.47 The Ridge at Riverwoods In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1,3.b.l,3.c.l.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 94

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.48 DeColores Childrens Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.49 Clipper Habor of Portsmouth CRC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.50 The Childrens Garden In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 95

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.51 Edgewood Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.52 Edgewood Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.53 Kindercare Learning Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 96

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.7.54 Kathleen Tostenson In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.55 Pats Family Child Care In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.7.56 Live Y'ers In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 97

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8 Support Jurisdictions 3.3.8.1 Rochester Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: L.a. 1, 1.c. 1, l.d. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.2 Dover Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a. 1, L.b. 1, .c. 1, l.d. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.3 Manchester Local EOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 98

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8.4 Manchester MHS Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

3.3.8.5 Rochester Reception Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a. 1, l.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.6 Rochester Reception Center Vehicles In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.d.1, 6.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.7 Rochester Reception Center Registration In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 6.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None 99

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.8 Manchester HS Reception Center Operations In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.l.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.9 Manchester Reception Center Dosimetry In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.10 Manchester Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.d.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: 6.b.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6bl-P-CRITERION: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their 100

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station equipment and vehicles.

CONDITION: There was conflicting guidance given to vehicle Monitoring Team at the Manchester, NH Reception Center on the morning of March 24, 2012. The team members were confused as to which guidance was to be used. Controller and team members consulted the evaluator as to what guidance to use. As the team was initially were conducting monitoring of a vehicle, two team members were employed at the same time and both were using different heights from monitored surface and different speeds in inches per second over the vehicle surface. As just in time training and correction in place the evaluator instructed the team to proceed with the most conservative of the three different standards.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: This evaluator was provided "April 2011, Radiological Emergency Response for Nuclear Facilities Attachment C, Implementing Procedures for Host Communities" on Table #2 the monitoring instructions for the Victoreen CDV-770-P "pancake probe" indicate "4 inches from the surface being monitored and a speed of 24 inches per second".

The Vehicle Monitoring staff had tow documents "5.7 Staff- Vehicle Monitoring Rev. 1/1/2012" which stated hold probe"l inch from surface and the vehicle monitoring should take 90 seconds" with no mention of monitoring sweep speed in inches per second.

The second document "Vehicle Monitoring 10-10 states to "hold the probe at 2 inches. Do not move fast!" and "monitoring of vehicle should not take less than 90 seconds". Again no mention of probe speed in inches per second.

REFERENCE:

6.b. I Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency worker Equipment, NUREG K.5.b, REP 22.1, 22.3 EFFECT: Had this been an actual nuclear power plant accident, the vehicle monitors would have given inconsistent and inaccurate measurements of vehicles and could have possibly declared a contaminated vehicle to be clean.

RECOMMENDATION: Establish one standard set of guidance for Vehicle 101

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Monitoring with a recommended distance of probe from of 1" from surface to be monitored and to move probe across surface to be monitored of 6" per second.

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.11 Manchester Reception Center Female Mon/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.a.1, 6.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.12 Manchester Reception Center Registration In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 6.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.13 Manchester Reception Center Male Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None 102

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

d. PLAN ISSUES: 6.a.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6a1-P-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.

CONDITION: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correctly.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Lack of proper training and understanding of the procedure for determining proper meter operation.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 75 ITEMS 9 & 10 EFFECT: Using a meter not that is not operating properly may possibly provide incorrect readings for contamination.

RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations

9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
10. DELETE
11. change 11 to 10 ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-P-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.

103

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station CONDITION: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Lack of proper training and incorrect procedures for determining proper background reading for work area.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 76 ITEMS 4, 5, & 6 EFFECT: Not determining proper background could cause improper adjusted readings while surveying people and equipment.

RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.

4. Replace paragraph 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone. Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.
5. DELETE
6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 104

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8.14 Manchester Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 6.a.1, 6.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.15 Rochester Reception Center Portal and Secondary Monitoring In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 6.a.1, 6.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.16 Rochester Reception Center Male Monitoring/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 6.a.1.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-A-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.

CONDITION: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area 105

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station POSSIBLE CAUSE: : Lack of proper training and incorrect procedures for determining proper background reading for work area.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 76 ITEMS 4, 5, & 6 EFFECT: Not determining proper background could cause improper adjusted readings while surveying people and equipment.

RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.

4. Replace paragraph 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone. Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.
5. Delete
6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.

ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-A-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.

CONDITION: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correct 106

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station POSSIBLE CAUSE: : Lack of proper training and understanding of the procedure for determining proper meter operation

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", PAGE 75 ITEMS 9 & 10 EFFECT: Using a meter not operating properly possibly provides incorrect reading for contamination.

RECOMMENDATION: : Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations

9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
10. DELETE
11. change 11 to 10 ISSUE NO.: 57-12-6al-A-CRITERION: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.

CONDITION:: INADEQUATE SUPPLIES:

Supply Issue: The Male Decontamination Team did not use the correct step off pads, they used a heavy paper pad labeled "Step Off Pad". They needed the multi page plastic step off pads. Reception center supply was checked and correct pads were not available.

Supply Issue: Procedures call for maslin mops to mop walk ways to pick up contamination that may have dropped on the floor. The male monitoring and 107

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station decontamination team had mop heads and handles but did not have any maslin cloth.

The Supply trailer was checked but no maslin cloth could be found.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Over-site not tracking required supplies in supply trailer

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654; Implementing Procedures for Host Communities, Attachment "C", Page 41, 45, and 49 equipment and supply inventory lists EFFECT: Not having the proper step off pads and maslin cloth would interfere with the proper operation of the radiological portion of the reception center. Create conditions that would cross contaminate evacuees and staff working in the reception center.

RECOMMENDATION: Take steps to procure the correct type step off pads and maslin cloth with sufficient quantities to support long term operations. Update inventory lists referenced above to include specific type step off pads and add mop-heads and handles along with maslin cloth.

c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.17 Rochester Reception Center Female Monitoring/Decon In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.a.1, 6.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 108

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station 3.3.8.18 Rockingham County State Transportation Staging Area In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. M ET: L.a. 1, 1.b. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.19 Wentworth Douglas Hospital In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 6.d.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.8.20 Elliot Hospital In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 6.d.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 109

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (PEP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station SECTION 4: CONCLUSION 110

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station APPENDIX A: IMPROVEMENT PLAN Nu a' Isu br 71-a -C itro ISSUE: During the conduct of the Seabrook Station (SS) Exercise on April 17, 2012, the Brentwood New Hamphire Emergency Operations Center (EOC) assigned a Radiological Defense (RADEF) Officer who had never been in the position before. The RADEF Officer did not understand his role in providing a briefing on dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI)to emergency workers before dispatching them to the field. He issued the dosimetry and KI without a briefing.

RECOMMENDATION:

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

IISSUE:

Isu u br 71'a--C itein a The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) failed to supply potassium iodide (KI) tablets with a briefing to the entire facility staff as per Kingston Plans and Procedures.

RECOMMENDATION: Procedures should be implemented that require the RADEF Officer and/or the EMD to compare the security sign-in sheet and. the Emergency Worker Potassium Iodide User Agreement Form 135A, Volume 8/Rev. 14, to ensure that all facility staff receives KI.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

111

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station IIsu u br 71-a l- Crtrin I I ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correctly.

RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations

9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
10. DELETE
11. chance 11 to 10 CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRMR RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area.

RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.

4. Replace paragraph 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone. Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.
5. DELETE
6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

112

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Isu Nu br 571-6]P 0-ie n 6b]

ISSUE: There was conflicting guidance given to vehicle Monitoring Team at the Manchester, NH Reception Center on the morning of March 24, 2012. The team members were confused as to which guidance was to be used.

Controller and team members consulted the evaluator as to what guidance to use. As the team was initially were conducting monitoring of a vehicle, two team members were employed at the same time and both were using different heights from monitored surface and different speeds in inches per second over the vehicle surface. As just in time training and correction in place the evaluator instructed the team to proceed with the most conservative of the three different standards.

RECOMMENDATION: Establish one standard set of guidance for Vehicle Monitoring with a recommended distance of probe from of 1" from surface to be monitored and to move probe across surface to be monitored of 6" per second.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMP_*_ARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: ]START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

~ 'tl 5 Issue Number: , i7*lel-,- Crtrin lei ISSUE: The Field Monitoring Team (FMT) did not have a beta galmna survey instrument as called for in Procedure 2.11.

RECOMMENDATION: The Radiation Control Program should update Procedure 2.11 to address the change to the survey equipment for the environmental sampling program. Also, if it is intended that the FMT perform plume tracking then a beta gamma survey instrument should be included in the kit.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

113

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station IIsu ubr 71-a ] -P rtro:3II ISSUE: Prior Issue 57-06-3al-A-08 was closed and replaced by this planning issue. The original performance issue stated that Members of the Maine Sampling Team from the Department of Health and Human Services wore the permanent record dosimeters (PRDs) they routinely wear, but no PRDs were included in the dosimetry provided with the sampling equipment and supplies or issued to DOA team members prior to their deployment from the State Emergency Operation Center.

The Maine Emergency Management Agency has proposed that the non Radiation Control Program members of the Field Monitoring Team go to the York County EOC and obtain an emergency worker dosimetry packet. York County maintains a stockpile of PRD that they get from the State of New Hampshire.

RECOMMENDATION: This solution (all non RCP members of the FMT go to York County EOC to obtain dosimetry) needs to be documented in the plan and procedures so that all State Agencies and York County are aware of it.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

IIseN ISSUE:

me:5 123]--C iein3a ]

The primary RADEF Officer in the Town of Newfields was unavailable and the alternate RADEF Officer substituted during the exercise. The alternate RADEF Officer was not familiar with zeroing the dosimetry. The Alternate RADEF Office did not brief the officer of the need to contact the officer's immediate supervisor when the 200mR. reading was reached. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not brief the side effects of Potassium Iodide during the breifing until prompted by another staff member. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not understand the meaning of the 5 R turn back value and did not emphasize the turn back value meaning to the officer.

RECOMMENDATION: The alternate RADEF Officer should be trained annually and participate in all exercises.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

114

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station IsueN mbr 5-2 -A- Crteio ISSUE: The New Hampshire Field Monitoring Team I(FMT 1) did not receive sufficient direction to support characterization of the release. FMT 1 never received direction to find the leading edge of the plume. The sample locations of 3.2, 3.7 and 3.8 provided by the Monitoring Team Coordinator (MTC) to the FMT I Team Lead never allowed FMTI to encounter any reading above background. Both air samples taken by FMT I were taken in background areas.

RECOMMENDATION: The Accident Assessment team and MTC should coordinate more effectively to direct both FMTs to identify the leading edges of the plume. The plans and procedures should reflect the need to identify the leading edges of the plume. Identify in the plans and procedures what actually constitutes the leading edges of a plume. For example when FMTs identify dose rates 10 times background this will be considered the leading edge of the plume.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

IIsu ISSUE:

u br 71-a --

CONDITION (describe the inadequacy):

C itein Field Sampling Team members were not aware that after the release has been terminated and entry into the intermediate phase, the dose limit reverts from the EPA-400 limits to those of Occupation Radiation Workers which is 5 REM TEDE. They were also not aware that any exposure accumulated during the emergency phase is not included in the intermediate exposure received.

RECOMMENDATION: Update the DPHS plan to state the change in the dose limit for Emergency Workers and include the emergency phase exposure is not included in the intermediate phase exposure received.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

115

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Nu Isu I br 71- l--C itein e ISSUE: Prior to instrument use, no operational checks were perfortned that used a known source and required an instrument response to be within a prescribed range. Also, there was no label affixed to the instrument that defined an acceptable range for the instrument response to a specific source. This was the situation for each of the seven survey instruments used by Radiochemistry Unit.

RECOMMENDATION: Modify State procedures to require an operational check for laboratory instrumentation prior to use using a known source and a label affixed to the instrument that defines that the instrument response must fall within a specific range.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

[is-Sue Number: 57-12-3a]-A- Criterion: 3a 1 1 ISSUE: Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.

The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gave inadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aid conflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains all information needed for emergency worker exposure control. The Radiological Officer also skipped important information that emergency workers needed to be briefed on prior to being deployed to the field (the Radiological Officer did not read off the Briefing Form that the State had provided to all EOCs)- the Radiological Officer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOC when the dosimeter reaches IR. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer provided inaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers who may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at a nuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose occupation carries with it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declaration in writing if they-are or think that they may be pregnant.

The Radiological Officer also had a Job Aid that conflicted with the Briefing Form that the State provided to the Emergency Operations Center.

The Radiological Officer was also using Rev 13 for Form 305A, which is out of date. Rev 14 Forms are the most up to date and and FEMA approved forms for emergency workers.

The Emergency Operations Center also had the wrong inventory form for the emergency worker kits. The one provided was out of date.

RECOMMENDATION: This previous issue was not corrected.

Training needs to be provided to the Radiological Officer. Rev 13 Forms need to be destroyed. The Job Aid must align with the Incident Annex and Implementing Procedures, as well as the City's Radiological Emergency Response Plan.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

116

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Is N57-12-6a]. A- Crteio*I 6a ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining background in working area RECOMMENDATION: Change written procedures to clearly define background procedures. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of determining background readings.

4. Replace paragraph 4. With: Ensure operator has earphone connected to meter and is wearing earphone. Count the number of clicks for fifteen seconds, multiply that number of clicks by four (X4) this will provide the background reading for that work area.
5. Delete
6. Change 6. To 5.; Record that background reading on a sign in large bold figures and hang in an area for all team members to see as a reminder as to what the background reading is.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: P RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

ISSUE: Survey meter operators unfamiliar with proper way of determining if a meter is operating correct RECOMMENDATION: : Change written procedures to clearly define correct meter operation. Conduct training so that operators have a clear understanding of meter operations

9. (After 10) meter needle should fall within the readings on the range of readings calibration label. If needle does not meet the range of readings meter is not operational.
10. DELETE
11. change 11 to 10 CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

117

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station I Issu Nunbr 571-a--C itein ISSUE:: INADEQUATE SUPPLIES:

Supply Issue: The Male Decontamination Team did not use the correct step off pads, they used a heavy paper pad labeled "Step Off Pad". They needed the multi page plastic step off pads. Reception center supply was checked and correct pads were not available.

Supply Issue: Procedures call for maslin mops to mop walk ways to pick up contamination that may have dropped on the floor. The male monitoring and decontamination team had mop heads and handles but did not have any maslin cloth. The Supply trailer was checked but no maslin cloth could be found.

RECOMMENDATION: Take steps to procure the correct type step off pads and maslin cloth with sufficient quantities to support long term operations. Update inventory lists referenced above to include specific type step off pads and add mop-heads and handles along with maslin cloth.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CAPABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

CAPABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE:

AGENCY POC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

118

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/improvement Plan Seabrook Station APPENDIX B: BEST PRACTICES

1. Excellent Initiative by Hampton Summary: In speaking with the Emergency Management Director (EMD), one of the initiatives that he brought to my attention was with "special populations." He noted that the town was now including children between the ages of 10-15 in the special population group, that is, children who were decision makers but who needed assistance in evacuating the town.

==

Description:==

In speaking with the Emergency Management Director (EMD), one of the initiatives that he brought to my attention was with "special populations." He noted that the town was now including children between the ages of 10-15 in the special population group, that is, children who were decision makers but who needed assistance in evacuating the town. In a specific case, there was a 14 year old who was home alone - her mother was working in Portsmouth. In her case, she knows that she needs to evacuate but she cannot drive a car.

Therefore, the EMD would be sure to include her in the population to be transported. This is definitely an underserved population.

2. York County Emergency Management Agency EOC and facility modernization Summary: York County relocated its Emergency Management Agency and Emergency Operations Center (EOC) location to a new site at 149 Jordan Spring Rd., in Alfred, ME within the past year and, as a result, created a facility that is an excellent model for any EOC supporting an agency of comparable size. The facility has excellent space available, security, equipage and habitability for extended EOC operations as well as routine activities. It is evident that significant appropriate planning was done to accommodate virtually any weather event durability-wise or other types of emergencies requiring staffing of almost any level that can be anticipated for the Agency. This includes providing effective backup power, upgrading windows and air handling systems and making the best use of spaces available.

==

Description:==

The recent facility relocation and upgrade at the York County Emergency Agency facility provides an excellent model for any agency of its size and mission.

119

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station

3. Access to Critical Facilites Summary: Access to critical communications areas needs to be controlled to reduce vulnerability regardless of the type of event.

==

Description:==

Access to the Rockingham County Dispatch Center is electronically controlled through three doors prior to gaining admittance to the dispatching area. TV screens in the dispatch area display real time status of the security system. One TV screen displayed door status throughout the facility and a second TV screen display security cameras, some of which were movement activated.

4. Communications Summary: In ability to communicate with neighboring states via organic radio systems and with using RACES resources.

==

Description:==

Maine (MEMA) communications office coordinated with MEMA (Massachusetts) communications officer having similar problems with talking to Maine Emergency Management.

Mass provided a radio to Maine which now allowed Maine to connect with the Amesbury, Mass repeater. This now allowed Mass to communicate with Maine and allowed Maine to communicate with five other New England states.

Maine RACES: installed a repeater on Mount Washington this now provided an ability to communicated with the New Hampshire SEOC.

5. Job Aid for Vehicle Monitoring Summary: The Vehicle Monitoring Team Leader at the Souht Manchester, NH Middle School Reception Center developed a Job Aid for the Vehicle Monitoring Team

==

Description:==

The Team Leader provided team members with xerographoic copies of the survey instrumet faces that were enlarged to twice or three times actual size so thst team members could familiarize themselves with the meter faces and better interpert meter readings.

120

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station APPENDIX C: EXERCISE TIMELINE Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Emergency Classification Levelor Z:

Event~

Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0823 0823 0831 0839 0842 0840 Site Area Emergency 1000 1008 1003 1015 1006 1015 1012 General Emergency 1115 1120 1118 1132 1118 1135 1131 Simulated Rad.Release Started 1129 1134 1133 N/A 1133 1135 1148 Simulated Rad. Release NAN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated Facility Declared Operational 0855 0905 N/A 0906 0845 0910 Declaration of State of Emergency 1000 0956 1005 0956 1006 Exercise Terminated 1350 1334 1330 1300 1338 Early Precautionary Actions: 0905 0915 0952 1018 0938 1st Protective Action Decision: 1105 1138 1110 1121 1144 1st Siren Activation 1039 1039 1039 1030 1039 1030 1st EAS or EBS Message 1042 1042 1042 1030 1042 1030 2nd Protective Action Decision: 1115 1226 1115 1226 1112 2nd Siren Activation 1121 1155 1121 1110 1121 1112 2nd EAS or EBS Message 1124 1158 1124 1110 1124 1112 3rd Protective Action Decision: 1139 N/A 1230 1144 3rd Siren Activation 1145 1234 1155 1149 1153 N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1155 1237 1158 1149 1158 1144 4th Protective Action Decision: 1255 N/A N/A N/A 4th Siren Activation 1234 1310 1234 N/A 1234 1225 4th EAS or EBS Message 1237 1313 1237 N/A 1237 1-225 5th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation 1310 1310 N/A N/A 1303 5th EAS or EBS Message 1313 1313 N/A N/A 1303 6th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A KI Administration Decision: 1139 1144 1152 1149 1135 1148 121

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH 0 U U 0 Eergency Classification Level or >0 SEvent a<

Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0837 N/A 0838 0837 0835 0835 Site Area Emergency 1000 1014 N/A 1014 1016 1014 1014 General Emergency 1115 1123 N/A 1133 1136 1133 1136 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1129 1147 N/A 1150 1148 1145 1136 Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated____________

Facility Declared Operational 0855 N/A 0907 0900 0945 0914 Declaration of State of Emergency 1006 N/A 0956 1006 1007 1012 Exercise Terminated 1338 N/A 1331 1215 1337 1339 Early Precautionary Actions: 1032 N/A N/A 0938 0938 1000 Protective Action Decision: 1032 N/A .st1030 1030 1112 1145 1st Siren Activation 1039 N/A 1039 1039 1039 1155 1 st EAS or EBS Message 1042 N/A 1042 1042 1042 1158 2nd Protective Action Decision: 1114 N/A N/A 1111 N/A 1301 2nd Siren Activation 1121 N/A 1121 1121 1121 1310 2nd EAS or EBS Message 1124 N/A 1124 1124 1124 1313 3rd Protective Action Decision: 1150 N/A N/A N/A N/A ______

3rd Siren Activation 1155 N/A 1155 1155 1155 N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1158 N/A 1158 1158 1158 N/A 4th Protective Action Decision: 1225 N/A N/A N/A N/A _____

4th Siren Activation 1234 N/A N/A N/A 1310 _____

4th EAS or EBS Message 1237 N/A N/A N/A 1313 _____

5th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A ______

5th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message ______ N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A KI Administration Decision: 1 1147 N/A 1148 1148 1145 1201 122

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH 0 U L ..

Em.er.gency Classification Level or Event

" 1-

  • .... Z .

Unusual Event N/A N/A . N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0837 0839 0835 0837 N/A 0906 Site Area Emergency 1000 1027 1019 1010 1015 N/A 1027 GeneralEmergency 1115 1136 1136 1132 1135 N/A 1137 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1129 1152 1146 1205 1145 N/A N/A Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated _____

Facility Declared Operational 0912 0918 0909 1000 N/A 0945 Declaration of State of Emergency 1027 1008 1000 N/A N/A 1007 Exercise Tenrinated 1338 N/A 1339 1340 N/A 1329 Early Precautionary Actions: 1000 111l 1003 1018 N/A 0940 1st Protective Action Decision: 1031 1147 1148 N/A 1Ist Siren Activation 1039 N/A 1039 1039 N/A Icst EAS or EBS Message 1042 N/A 1042 1042 N/A 2nd Protective Action Decision: 1152 N/A 1237 1229 N/A 2nd Siren Activation 1155 1ll5 1121 1155 N/A 2nd EAS orEBS Message 1158 N/A 1124 1158 N/A 3rd Protective Action Decision: 1152 N/A N/A N/A N/A 3rd Siren Activation 1234 1226 1155 1234 N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1237 N/A 1158 1237 N/A 4th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A 4th Siren Activation N/A 1234 1310 N/A 4th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1237 1313 N/A 5th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation N/A 1310 N/A N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1313 N/A N/A 6th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A KI Administration Decision: 1152 1146 1216 1200 N/A 123

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Emergency Classification Level or >.

Event C.'

o. ..  :. .. J 2>

Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 N/A 0835 N/A 0845 0838 0838 Site Area Emergency 1000 N/A 1013 N/A 1016 1009 1018 General Emergency 1115 N/A 1133 N/A 1136 1132 1 1133 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1129 N/A 1211 N/A 1146 N/A 1145 Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated _______________________

Facility Declared Operational N/A 0840 N/A 0856 0958 0943 Declaration of State of Emergency N/A 1003 N/A 0956 1010 0956 Exercise Terminated N/A 1327 N/A 1337 1337 1337 Early Precautionary Actions: N/A 0915 N/A 0943 0940 N/A Protective Action Decision: N/A

-st 1121 N/A 1030 N/A N/A I1stSiren Activation N/A 1033 N/A 1039 N/A 1039 1st EAS or EBS Message N/A 1039 N/A 1042 N/A 1042 2nd Protective Action Decision: N/A 1145 N/A 1115 N/A N/A 2nd Siren Activation N/A 1115 N/A 1121 N/A 1121 2nd EAS or EBS Message N/A 1121 N/A 1124 N/A 1124 3rd Protective Action Decision: N/A ______ N/A 1145 N/A N/A 3rd Siren Activation N/A 1150 N/A 1155 N/A 1155 3rd EAS or EBS Message N/A 1158 N/A 1158 N/A 1158 4th Protective Action Decision: N/A ______ N/A 122 4 N/A N/A 4th Siren Activation N/A 1234 N/A 1234 N/A 1234 4th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1237 N/A 1237 N/A 1237 5th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation N/A 0835 N/A 1310 N/A 1310 SthEASrorEBSmMessage N/A N/A 1313 N/A 1313 6th Protective Action Decision: N/A 1133 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A 1211 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IsKIAdministration Decision: N/A 1211 N/A 1145 N/A 1149 124

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH Emergency Classification Level or 0 U 0 Eveits C/

Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0823 0823 0830 0831 0832 0832 Site Area Emergency 1000 1008 1003 1018 102'2 1031 1030 General Emergency 1115 1128 1118 1135 1145 1148 1 1148 Simulated Rad.Release Started 1129 1148 1133 1129 1145 1148 1148 Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Terminated____________ ______ ______

Facility Declared Operational 0845 0905 0846 0849 0900 0925 Declaration of State of Emergency 0920 1003 0920 1040 0934 0942 Exercise Terminated 1335 1334 1345 1345 1347 N/A Early Precautionary Actions: 0920 0928 0920 0928 0920 0940 1stProtective Action Decision: 1029 1111 N/A 1112 N/A 1st Siren Activation 1039 1039 1039 1039 1039 1037 1st EAS or BBS Message 1042 1042 1042 1042 1042 1037 2nd Protective Action Decision: 1109 1136 1106 1110 1140 1119 2nd Siren Activation 1121 1121 1121 1121 1121 1121 2nd EAS or ElS Message 1124 1124 1124 1124 1124 1124 3rd Protective Action Decision: 1139 1150 N/A N/A 3rd Siren Activation 1155 1155 1155 1155 1155 1155 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1158 1158 1158 1158 1158 1158 4th Protective Action Decision: 1228 N/A 1314 4th Siren Activation 1234 1234 1234 N/A 1310 4th EAS or EBS Message 1237 1237 1237 N/A 1313 5th Protective Action Decision: 1307 N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation 1310 1310 1310 N/A N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message _ ____ 1313 1313 1313 N/A N/A 6th Protective Action Decision: ___________ _____ N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation ___________ _____ N/A N/A N/A 16th EAS or EBS Message ___________ _____ N/A N/A N/A IKI Administration Decision: 1128 1118 1135 1145 1140 1147 125

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH UU Emergency Classification Level or :i. "

Event . U

  • .... ,....... .... . "...... .. Z.: ...

Unusuaml Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0813 0829 0831 0833 0917 0838 Site Area Emergency 1000 1014 1014 1015 1016 1020 General Emergency 1115 1146 1144 1145 1139 1136 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1129 1147 1129 1129 1139 N/A Simulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A 1500 N/A Terminated Facility Declared Operational 0903 0853 0855 0930 0900 Declaration of State of Emergency 0935 0943 0920 1135 1139 Exercise Terminated N/A 1347 N/A 1400 1420 Early Precautionary Actions: 0930 0930 0920 1017 1049 1st Protective Action Decision: 1110 1111 1145 N/A N/A Ist Siren Activation 1121 1039 1039 N/A N/A 1st EAS or EBS Message 1124 1042 1042 N/A N/A 2nd Protective Action Decision: 1150 1146 1215 N/A N/A 2nd Siren Activation 1155 1121 1121 N/A N/A 2nd EAS or EBS Message 1158 1124 1124 N/A N/A 3rd Protective Action Decision: 1221 1238 N/A N/A 3rd Siren Activation 1234 1155 1155 N/A N/A 3rd EAS or EBS Message 1237 1158 1158 N/A N/A 4th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A 4th Siren Activation N/A 1234 1234 N/A N/A 4th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1237 1237 N/A N/A 5th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A 5th Siren Activation N/A 1310 N/A N/A N/A 5th EAS or EBS Message N/A 1313 N/A N/A N/A 6th Protective Action Decision: N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th Siren Activation N/A N/A N/A N/A 6th EAS or EBS Message N/A N/A N/A N/A KI Administration Decision: 1146 1146 1145 1245 1043 126

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station APPENDIX D: EXERCISE EVALUATORS AND TEAM LEADERS 127

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station DATE: 2012-04-18, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH LOCATION EVALUATOR AGENCY NH State Emergency Operations Center Patricia Foster FEMA RI Michael Shuler FEMA RIII Kim Wood ICFI NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility *Thomas Essig ICFI John McGough FEMA - RI NH State Police Communications Center, NIH State Warning Point Kim Wood ICFI Rockingham County Dispatch Center *Paul Ringheiser ICFI Cheryl Weaver ICF NH (SS) Joint Infornation Center *Paul Nied ICFI NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-i *Johanna Berkey FEMA RX NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 *Martin Vyenielo FEMA RIIl Massachusetts State Emergency Operations Center Ronald Biernacki ICFI Brian Kennedy FEMA William Palmer ICF MA (SS) Emergency Operations Facility Brad McRee ICF

  • Roy Smith ICFI MA Region I EOC Terry Sheehan DOT
  • David White ICFI MA (SS) Joint Information Center Paul Nied ICFI MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-I *Michael Howe FEMA HQ MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 *Marcy Campbell ICFI MA Media Center *Meg Swearingen ICFI MA State Laboratory - Day 2 *Michael Howe FEMA HQ NH State Emergency Operations Center Day 2 *Michael Shuler FEMA RIII Bill Webb FEMA RX NH - Field Sampling Team - 1 *Martin Vyenielo FEMA RIII NH - Field Sampling Team - 2 *Johanna Berkey FEMA RX NH State Laboratory - Day 2 *Daryl Thome ICFI ME State Emergency Operations Center *Robert Swartz FEMA RI ME State Emergency Operations Center - Day 2 Richard McPeak ICFI
  • Robert Swartz FEMA RI ME Incident Field Office ME Incident Field Office - Day 2 ME Field Sampling Team - I *Reggie Rodgers ICFI ME State Health and Environmental Testing Laboratory *Kent Tosch ICFI NH State EOC Local Liaison Bridget Ahlgrim FEMA HQ Brad DeKorte FEMA RVI Rebecca Fontenot FEMA HQ Rochester Reception Center Dosimetry Issue and Briefing, Emergency Helen LaForge FEMA RI Worker Dosimeter Brentwood Local EOC Michael Petullo ICFI
  • Mario Vigliani ICFI East Kingston Local EOC Deborah Blunt ICFI
  • Bruce Swiren ICFI Exeter Local EOC Ann Mulvaney FEMA RI

_ *Clayton Spangenberg ICFI Greenland Local EOC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI 128

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Hampton Local EOC Betsy Snell FEMA - RI

  • Kent Tosch ICFI Hampton Falls Local EOC *Laura Forrest FEMA RII Thomas Gahan ICFI Kensington Local EOC Patrick Taylor ICFI
  • Miriatn Weston FEMA RII Kingston NiH Local EOC Gary Bolender ICFI
  • Brian Hasemann FEMA RII New Castle Local EOC Henry Christiansen ICFI
  • Patricia Mason FEMA RII Newfields Local EOC Jon Christiansen ICFI
  • Anthony Honnellio EPA Newton Local EOC Mark Dalton ICFI
  • Linda Gee FEMA RVI North Hampton Local EOC Joseph Lischinsky ICFI
  • Timothy Pflieger FEMA RVI Portsmouth Local EOC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Rye Local EOC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Seabrook Local EOC *Patricia Gardner FEMA - HQ Gary Goldberg ICFI South Hampton Local EOC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Stratham Local EOC Nulise Francois Wanda Gaudet FEMA - RI
  • Helen LaForge FEMA RI Amesbury Local EOC *Richard Echavarria FEMA RIX Wes Ryals ICF Merrimac Local EOC Elena Joyner FEMA RIX
  • Daryl Thome ICFI Newbury Local EOC *Rosemary Samsel ICFI Alberto Sifuentes FEMA RIX Newburyport Local EOC Paul Anderson FEMA RIX
  • David Petta ICFI Salisbury Local EOC *Ingrid Bruns FEMA RI Danny Loomis ICFI West Newbury Local EOC *Larry Broockerd FEMA HQ Roger Jobe ICFI Amesbury: Amesbury Schools Superintendent *John Rice FEMA RI Pentucket Schools Superintendent *John Rice FEMA RI ME York County EOC Richard Fournier ICFI
  • Bonnie Sheffield FEMA -RVIII Adeline C. Marston School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Coorperative Middle School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Heronfield Academy *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Winnacunnet High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Seabrook Elementary School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Lincoln Street Elementary School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Swasey Central School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Kensignton Elementary School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Sanborn Region High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Memorial School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Exeter High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI 129

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Hampton Academy *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI North Hampton School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Greenland Central School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI New Franklin School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Lister Academy *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Amesbury: Amesbury Academy Charter *John Rice FEMA RI Amesbury: Cashman School *John Rice FEMA RI Amesbury: Little Sprouts Daycare *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Amesbury: Sparhawk Lower School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Methuen: Timony School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Amesbury:Camp Bauercrest *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Residential Options *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newbury: Triton Supt. *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Coastal Alternative School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Community Action-Head Start *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI W. NewburyPathways for Learning *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI West Newbury: Learning Tree Preschool *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Tewksbury High School *John Rice FEMA RI Salisbury: New Beginnings Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Kinder Care Daniel Lucy *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Nock Middle School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Newburyport Supt. *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Kinder Care Low Street *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Mrs. Murrays Preschool *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Newburyport High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Newburyport Residence *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Newburyport Montessori *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI A Place to Grow *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Rockingham County Nursing Home *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Polka Dots Childcare Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Appleseeds Day Care *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Donna Clarke Family Day Care *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Stratham Circle Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Great Bay Kid's Company *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newton Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Over the Rainbow *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI My First School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Imprints Day School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Kids Stop Inc. *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Ctr *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI The Ridge at Riverwoods *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI DeColores Childrens Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Clipper Habor of Portsmouth CRC *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI The Childrens Garden *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Edgewood Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Edgewood Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI 130

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station Kindercare Learning Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Kathleen Tostenson *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Pats Family Child Care *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Live Y'ers *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Newburyport: Inn Street Montessori *John Rice FEMA RI Rochester Local EOC Barton Freeman FEMA RIII

  • Katherine Nishihara FEMA RIX Dover Local EOC James Chemiack
  • Edward Diaz FEMA RV Manchester Local EOC Brian Collins FEMA - RI
  • Kenneth Wierman FEMA HQ Manchester MHS Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring Rochester Reception Center *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Rochester Reception Center Vehicles Don Carlton FEMA RI Rochester Reception Center Registration Helen LaForge FEMA RI Manchester HS Reception Center Operations *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Manchester Reception Center Dosimetry Helen LaForge FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon Don Carlton FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Female Mon/Decon Taneeka Hollins FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Registration Barbara Thomas FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Male Decon Robert Swartz FEMA RI Manchester Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring John Rice FEMA RI Rochester Reception Center Portal and Secondary Monitoring Ingrid Bruns FEMA RI Rochester Reception Center Male Monitoring/Decon Robert Swartz FEMA RI Rochester Reception Center Female Monitoring/Decon Taneeka Hollins FEMA RI Rockingham County State Transportation Staging Area Ingrid Bruns FEMA RI Helen LaForge FEMA RI
  • Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Barbara Thomas FEMA RI Wentworth Douglas Hospital *Helen LaForge FEMA RI Elliot Hospital *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Lexington: Minuteman High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Methuen: Methuen High School *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Wilmington: Shriner's Auditorium *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI Wakefield: Wakefield High School *John Rice FEMA RI MA KIDispensing Site-Danvers *Melissa Savilonis FEMA - RI MA State Police Assembly- Troop A *John Rice FEMA RI Methuen: Marash Grammer School *John Rice FEMA I
  • Team Leader, 131

Unclassified Radiological EmergenO,ý-Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station This page is intentionally blank.

132

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12258A200&oldid=2460810"