ML15337A282: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:FIGURE 1  
{{#Wiki_filter:United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of:                    Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.                                                NYS000566 (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
Submitted: September 9, 2015 ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #: NYS000566-00-BD01                Identified: 11/5/2015 Admitted: 11/5/2015                        Withdrawn:
Rejected:                                      Stricken:
Other:
FIGURE 1 BEe (1)
(3) (2) 1.0
                                                                                    +
BEne Limit Line (LL)
CUFen                Best Estimate (BE) 1017                                              FLUENCE (n/cm2)
EOL (PEO)        TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).
Note:
(1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL).
(2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life.
(3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.


Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne). Note:  (1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life. BEne 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2) CUFen Limit Line (LL) Best Estimate (BE) (3) BEe 1.0 (2) (1)  - EOL (PEO) TIME FIGURE 1 
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of:                   Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.                                                NYS000566 (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
 
Submitted: September 9, 2015 ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #: NYS000566-00-BD01                Identified: 11/5/2015 Admitted: 11/5/2015                        Withdrawn:
Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne). Note: (1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life. BEne 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2) CUFen Limit Line (LL) Best Estimate (BE) (3) BEe 1.0 (2) (1)  - EOL (PEO) TIME}}
Rejected:                                      Stricken:
Other:
FIGURE 1 BEe (1)
(3) (2) 1.0
                                                                                    +
BEne Limit Line (LL)
CUFen                Best Estimate (BE) 1017                                              FLUENCE (n/cm2)
EOL (PEO)         TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).
Note:
(1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL).
(2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life.
(3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.}}

Latest revision as of 08:07, 5 February 2020

Official Exhibit - NYS000566-00-BD01 - Figure 1 for Supplemental Reply Testimony of Dr. Richard T. Lahey
ML15337A282
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/2015
From:
State of NY, Office of the Attorney General
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 28270, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR
Download: ML15337A282 (1)
v • d • e


Text

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. NYS000566 (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #: NYS000566-00-BD01 Identified: 11/5/2015 Admitted: 11/5/2015 Withdrawn:

Rejected: Stricken:

Other:

FIGURE 1 BEe (1)

(3) (2) 1.0

+

BEne Limit Line (LL)

CUFen Best Estimate (BE) 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2)

EOL (PEO) TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).

Note:

(1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL).

(2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life.

(3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. NYS000566 (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #: NYS000566-00-BD01 Identified: 11/5/2015 Admitted: 11/5/2015 Withdrawn:

Rejected: Stricken:

Other:

FIGURE 1 BEe (1)

(3) (2) 1.0

+

BEne Limit Line (LL)

CUFen Best Estimate (BE) 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2)

EOL (PEO) TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).

Note:

(1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL).

(2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life.

(3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15337A282&oldid=2446082"