ML15337A282: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 24: Line 24:
                                                                                     +
                                                                                     +
BEne Limit Line (LL)
BEne Limit Line (LL)
                                                                                    -
CUFen                Best Estimate (BE) 1017                                              FLUENCE (n/cm2)
CUFen                Best Estimate (BE) 1017                                              FLUENCE (n/cm2)
EOL (PEO)        TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).
EOL (PEO)        TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).
Line 40: Line 39:
                                                                                     +
                                                                                     +
BEne Limit Line (LL)
BEne Limit Line (LL)
                                                                                    -
CUFen                Best Estimate (BE) 1017                                              FLUENCE (n/cm2)
CUFen                Best Estimate (BE) 1017                                              FLUENCE (n/cm2)
EOL (PEO)        TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).
EOL (PEO)        TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).

Latest revision as of 07:07, 5 February 2020

Official Exhibit - NYS000566-00-BD01 - Figure 1 for Supplemental Reply Testimony of Dr. Richard T. Lahey
ML15337A282
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/2015
From:
State of NY, Office of the Attorney General
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 28270, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR
Download: ML15337A282 (1)


Text

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. NYS000566 (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #: NYS000566-00-BD01 Identified: 11/5/2015 Admitted: 11/5/2015 Withdrawn:

Rejected: Stricken:

Other:

FIGURE 1 BEe (1)

(3) (2) 1.0

+

BEne Limit Line (LL)

CUFen Best Estimate (BE) 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2)

EOL (PEO) TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).

Note:

(1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL).

(2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life.

(3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. NYS000566 (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #: NYS000566-00-BD01 Identified: 11/5/2015 Admitted: 11/5/2015 Withdrawn:

Rejected: Stricken:

Other:

FIGURE 1 BEe (1)

(3) (2) 1.0

+

BEne Limit Line (LL)

CUFen Best Estimate (BE) 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2)

EOL (PEO) TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).

Note:

(1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL).

(2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life.

(3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.