L-2016-034, Annual Fitness-For-Duty Program Report for Period of January 1 Through December 31, 2015

Annual Fitness-For-Duty Program Report for Period of January 1 Through December 31, 2015

ML16055A118
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	02/19/2016
From:	Katzman E Florida Power & Light Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2016-034
Download: ML16055A118 (6)

Text

February 19, 2016 IFPLo L-201 6-034 10 CFR 26 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 RE: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Fitness-For-Duty Progqram Report In accordance with 10 CFR 26.717, letter forwards the fitness-for-duty program performance data for the period of January 1 through December 31, 2015.

Enclosed are the following attachments: 1) Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data (submitted via EIE General Submission Portal Submission ID8564 - Note:

The text block on page 2, "Summary of Management Action, Topic 1 Description,"

is truncated on the printed version attached) and 2) 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I -

Annual Fatigue Results.

Please contact us should you have any questions regarding this submittal.

Sincerely, Eric S. Katzman Licensing Manager St. Lucie Plant ES K/tlt Attachments Florida Power & Light Comnpany H*I*.

6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-201 6-034 Attachments Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data (2 pages)

Note: Report was submitted via EIE General Submission Portal Submission ID 8564 Page 2, "Summary of Management Action, Topic 1 Description," is truncated on the printed version attached 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results (2 pages)

FootOWName RaanmPen~ad 10 CFR Part 26. Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results ta.Lacie .2015 V Number of Waivers Issued (Note: At least one ot the cells in this table should have a non-negative value)

Operating yr on-site directing of the eromnhethpyisochisr Promngdtsofaiebgde Performing maintenance or onsite Performing security oeainofssesadecie n duties as described in 26.4(a)(2) member, as described in 26.4(a)(3) as dscribed i dctiesctiasodescribedncin Outage Outage Work Hour Controls 26t.4(a)((1

) 26A(a)((4) ecie n2.()5 Ouisa perating Tol( atedy Total Ttl(as (fe a 1.t.t0 60)

Outaga (days Outage (after Outage (after Outage (after Outage (after Outage (aftrie

______Operating 1-60) day 60) Operating Outage day 60) Operating Qaag day ftft Operating Outage,,... day 60( Operating Outage day f0)t(

trse tftraorkbhrebr any ___

24 b priod ,.. .3 1 3 t 0 DailyWokftoo 26 mat kmin any____

Houm *0 0 O 26.205(d)(1) ri br wonlad *7 -.

Rout Btreaks aonntmargofin eedastenfamfon 26.200(d)(2( fvitto)rO S Av ftehtfrea 2n daysofprme n

Minimum fa 0 radfsfleeOafrgI DaysAon 2.OtOa0soff0pe PerAvgOof0leaOthan

=* i*.]Ul~UU** *~a=i u= l* l* uoouu mis oin, Quccec,pros 00M01 mereiroiiy ouner Ire rrre ornoaaecolUmn. Wave avotUlecount mane iorniolluais.

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results Factlitv Name __Report Period St. Lude Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(ell1 )liii) ....... I............ ........ - .... 9rn( 1'\1 I Number of Em toyees Issued Waivers Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:

rhere 1121twelve waivers performed in 2015. Two of the waivers involved the emergent replacement of Unit 2" 'Safety Related"

.1asswere "A" Valves V3525 and V3527. Three of the waivers provided support for Unit1 Main Feedwater Isolation Valve (MFIV) Repair Operating or on- Performing eroPerforming site directing of health phyaica snd 171 seven were in support of the 2A emergency diesel generator (EDG) critical maintenance management ICMM) activities. The Pefrming manencor Pfoig duties of a fire maneacor Pfrig waivers were associated with work hour controls greater than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> insa 7 day period, end less than a day off for 7day period, Number of Waivers the operations or chemistry brigade member onsite directing security duties ireater than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> in any 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period and greater than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in any 7 days.

of systems, as duties as adecid nof maintenance as described in described in described in 264as)dscrbe in as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(1) 26.4(a)(2) 264a1) 26.4(a)(4)

Analysis of Fatiglue Assessment Data:

Eight online fatigue assessments were conducted in 2015: Seven workers were assessed "For- Cause," I1l Engineering, 151Contractor 4 __________

Norkers, and one I1l Maintenance worker: all were determined not to be impaired and continued to work. One badged worker was 5 ______ ______ sassessed for Post Event and was determined not to be impaired, and continued to work.

3 18i Morethen 20' .......

To*ta Numrber of ....

Employ1ees Issed ;..

WaVvers 00 0 120

Conclusions:

Provided to a S~nle There waresa total of twelve 1121 to perform maintenance on safety rated waivers issued in 2015. The waivers were not required for safely or security reasons but were required components to ensure safe and reliable operations of the nuclear units.

• Note: Foriitdeida performingthe [re bttgede dties, paease ounotthemottt unde fi breede column, Do not doubteou these iodividoae.

Summary of Status of Cotrective Actions:

There weamn"ocorrective actions taken in response to the use of waivers and the conduct of fatigue assessments in 2015.

Estimated burden per response to comply with this collection request is 114 hours0.00132 days <br />0.0317 hours <br />1.884921e-4 weeks <br />4.3377e-5 months <br />. This form is a voluntary means of reporting the information required under 10 CFR 26.717. The information is required by NRC to obtain on an annual basic site specific fitness-for-duty (FF0) program performance data on drug and alcohol programs from licensees and other entities. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collection Branch (T5-F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to Infocollects.ResourceaNRC cov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-1020, (3150-0146), Office of Management and Budget, Washington DC 20503. Ifsa means used to impose information collection does not display a currently valid 0MB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

1) All fields required unless marked 'opt lanai'

2) Use of Adobe Reader 8 or later is required D Update Submission

3) Mouse over fields for additional information Select Facility Perodof Report St. Lucie [50-335; 50-389]

Thete (*nnrhliftnA in th* Cal~ndnr Year Total Number of Tests Conducted Total Number of Positive, Adulterated, Reason For Testing Licensee Employees ContractorsNendors Substituted, and Refusal to Test Results Pre-Access 224 [1,996Z I Random 520 489 41 Total (Calculated) 796 2,566 1 FFD Program Random Testing Population and Rate Average number of Average number of Total size of the random testing pool Annual random testing percentage licensee employees contractors/vendors throughout the period (Calculated) achieved for the testing pool Laboratory Testing Does your program use a Licensee Testing Facility? No (Yes / No)

Identify your HHS-Certified Laboratory(ies) IQuest Diagnostics, Inc. in Tucker, GA Identify your Blind Performance Test Sample supplier(s) IElSohly Laboratories in Oxford, MS Substances Tested Did your program only test for NRC-required substances Does your program conduct LOD testing Ye AND. at the NRC-specified minimum cutoff levels? (Yes / No) Yes permitted in 26.163(a)(2)? (Yes / No) Yes SpecialAnalyses Testing Results Total Number of "Dilute" 5 Total Number of "Dilute" Specimens II5 Specimen Test Results 15 1(Special Analyses Testing Conducted) 1 2 (Optional) It Sbtne Use Only NRC Cutoff Initial Confirmatory LOD Testing? Comment Sbtne Levels? (Yes / No) Cutoff Cutoff (Yes / No) (Optional)

Alcohol IYes NotAplicable II Coca['""es"'s"".. LOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post CocineEvent and Followup specimens I I~LOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post Marijuana Yes Yes Event and Followup specimens Apea ine Ye YsLOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post Amphetamine__esYes, vent and Followup specimens Opiats r~5 i LOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post

[pae e .... ______

Yes______

"']

Event and Followup specimens PC YsLOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post

._.. vent and Followup specimens

• nnual Report Form (version 1.6.0 - December 19, 2014) - Page 1 of 2- NRC Form 891 (12/201,

Substances Tested - continued Summary of Management Actions - 26.71 7(b)(8)

Summarize actions implemented to improve FFD program performance. As applicable, reference in the topic description audit reports, 30-day reports, and/or corrective action reports. If reporting information on more than three topics, select "Others" for Topic 3 to report any additional topics.

Tonic 1 Topic 1 Description

• -.Program and System Management For the reporting period of 2015, eleven (11) individuals were denied unescorted access authorization after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type, two (2) follow-up tests were positive, five (5) pre-access tests were positive, and four (4) random tests were positive.

Follow-Up Positive Test Two (2) contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. These individuals were denied access.

One (1) follow-up test result was appealed. The appeal test result confirmed the original result.

Pre-Access Positive Test Two (2) initial contractor employee tested positive for marijuana. One (1) reinstatement less than 365 day contractor employee tested positive for cocaine. One (1) reinstatement less than 365 day L Topic 2 Topic 2 Description Blind Performance Test Samples For the 2015 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to St. Lucie Nuclear Plant's HHS-certified laboratory yielded expected results.

[] Add an additional Topic Person(s) Responsible for Information Provided Person 1 (required):

Robert 2

lBoskey Access/FFD Supervisor Robert.L.Boskey~nee.com First Name Last Name Position Title Company Email Address (optional):

Person Person 2 (optional):

First Name Last Name Position Title Company Email Address button has has beenand been selected all errors Final (i.e., those in NRC (Required).-

Step highlighted will consider red) have been corrected. authentic this form The in accordance "Validate & Lock" button 26.11 with will only when change to "Locked" after the&data the "Validate Lock"validation process successfully completed and the form is ready for submission.

L1LI~~IIZ1 Annual Report Form (version 1 *6.0 - December 19, 2014) -Page 2 of 2 - (12/2014) 891 (12/2014)

Annual Report Form (version 1.6.0 - December 19, 2014) Page2of2- NRC Form NRC Form 891

February 19, 2016 IFPLo L-201 6-034 10 CFR 26 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 RE: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Fitness-For-Duty Progqram Report In accordance with 10 CFR 26.717, letter forwards the fitness-for-duty program performance data for the period of January 1 through December 31, 2015.

Enclosed are the following attachments: 1) Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data (submitted via EIE General Submission Portal Submission ID8564 - Note:

The text block on page 2, "Summary of Management Action, Topic 1 Description,"

is truncated on the printed version attached) and 2) 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I -

Annual Fatigue Results.

Please contact us should you have any questions regarding this submittal.

Sincerely, Eric S. Katzman Licensing Manager St. Lucie Plant ES K/tlt Attachments Florida Power & Light Comnpany H*I*.

6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-201 6-034 Attachments Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data (2 pages)

Note: Report was submitted via EIE General Submission Portal Submission ID 8564 Page 2, "Summary of Management Action, Topic 1 Description," is truncated on the printed version attached 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results (2 pages)

FootOWName RaanmPen~ad 10 CFR Part 26. Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results ta.Lacie .2015 V Number of Waivers Issued (Note: At least one ot the cells in this table should have a non-negative value)

Operating yr on-site directing of the eromnhethpyisochisr Promngdtsofaiebgde Performing maintenance or onsite Performing security oeainofssesadecie n duties as described in 26.4(a)(2) member, as described in 26.4(a)(3) as dscribed i dctiesctiasodescribedncin Outage Outage Work Hour Controls 26t.4(a)((1

) 26A(a)((4) ecie n2.()5 Ouisa perating Tol( atedy Total Ttl(as (fe a 1.t.t0 60)

Outaga (days Outage (after Outage (after Outage (after Outage (after Outage (aftrie

______Operating 1-60) day 60) Operating Outage day 60) Operating Qaag day ftft Operating Outage,,... day 60( Operating Outage day f0)t(

trse tftraorkbhrebr any ___

24 b priod ,.. .3 1 3 t 0 DailyWokftoo 26 mat kmin any____

Houm *0 0 O 26.205(d)(1) ri br wonlad *7 -.

Rout Btreaks aonntmargofin eedastenfamfon 26.200(d)(2( fvitto)rO S Av ftehtfrea 2n daysofprme n

Minimum fa 0 radfsfleeOafrgI DaysAon 2.OtOa0soff0pe PerAvgOof0leaOthan

=* i*.]Ul~UU** *~a=i u= l* l* uoouu mis oin, Quccec,pros 00M01 mereiroiiy ouner Ire rrre ornoaaecolUmn. Wave avotUlecount mane iorniolluais.

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results Factlitv Name __Report Period St. Lude Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(ell1 )liii) ....... I............ ........ - .... 9rn( 1'\1 I Number of Em toyees Issued Waivers Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:

rhere 1121twelve waivers performed in 2015. Two of the waivers involved the emergent replacement of Unit 2" 'Safety Related"

.1asswere "A" Valves V3525 and V3527. Three of the waivers provided support for Unit1 Main Feedwater Isolation Valve (MFIV) Repair Operating or on- Performing eroPerforming site directing of health phyaica snd 171 seven were in support of the 2A emergency diesel generator (EDG) critical maintenance management ICMM) activities. The Pefrming manencor Pfoig duties of a fire maneacor Pfrig waivers were associated with work hour controls greater than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> insa 7 day period, end less than a day off for 7day period, Number of Waivers the operations or chemistry brigade member onsite directing security duties ireater than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> in any 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period and greater than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in any 7 days.

of systems, as duties as adecid nof maintenance as described in described in described in 264as)dscrbe in as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(1) 26.4(a)(2) 264a1) 26.4(a)(4)

Analysis of Fatiglue Assessment Data:

Eight online fatigue assessments were conducted in 2015: Seven workers were assessed "For- Cause," I1l Engineering, 151Contractor 4 __________

Norkers, and one I1l Maintenance worker: all were determined not to be impaired and continued to work. One badged worker was 5 ______ ______ sassessed for Post Event and was determined not to be impaired, and continued to work.

3 18i Morethen 20' .......

To*ta Numrber of ....

Employ1ees Issed ;..

WaVvers 00 0 120

Conclusions:

Provided to a S~nle There waresa total of twelve 1121 to perform maintenance on safety rated waivers issued in 2015. The waivers were not required for safely or security reasons but were required components to ensure safe and reliable operations of the nuclear units.

• Note: Foriitdeida performingthe [re bttgede dties, paease ounotthemottt unde fi breede column, Do not doubteou these iodividoae.

Summary of Status of Cotrective Actions:

There weamn"ocorrective actions taken in response to the use of waivers and the conduct of fatigue assessments in 2015.

Estimated burden per response to comply with this collection request is 114 hours0.00132 days <br />0.0317 hours <br />1.884921e-4 weeks <br />4.3377e-5 months <br />. This form is a voluntary means of reporting the information required under 10 CFR 26.717. The information is required by NRC to obtain on an annual basic site specific fitness-for-duty (FF0) program performance data on drug and alcohol programs from licensees and other entities. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collection Branch (T5-F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to Infocollects.ResourceaNRC cov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-1020, (3150-0146), Office of Management and Budget, Washington DC 20503. Ifsa means used to impose information collection does not display a currently valid 0MB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

1) All fields required unless marked 'opt lanai'

2) Use of Adobe Reader 8 or later is required D Update Submission

3) Mouse over fields for additional information Select Facility Perodof Report St. Lucie [50-335; 50-389]

Thete (*nnrhliftnA in th* Cal~ndnr Year Total Number of Tests Conducted Total Number of Positive, Adulterated, Reason For Testing Licensee Employees ContractorsNendors Substituted, and Refusal to Test Results Pre-Access 224 [1,996Z I Random 520 489 41 Total (Calculated) 796 2,566 1 FFD Program Random Testing Population and Rate Average number of Average number of Total size of the random testing pool Annual random testing percentage licensee employees contractors/vendors throughout the period (Calculated) achieved for the testing pool Laboratory Testing Does your program use a Licensee Testing Facility? No (Yes / No)

Identify your HHS-Certified Laboratory(ies) IQuest Diagnostics, Inc. in Tucker, GA Identify your Blind Performance Test Sample supplier(s) IElSohly Laboratories in Oxford, MS Substances Tested Did your program only test for NRC-required substances Does your program conduct LOD testing Ye AND. at the NRC-specified minimum cutoff levels? (Yes / No) Yes permitted in 26.163(a)(2)? (Yes / No) Yes SpecialAnalyses Testing Results Total Number of "Dilute" 5 Total Number of "Dilute" Specimens II5 Specimen Test Results 15 1(Special Analyses Testing Conducted) 1 2 (Optional) It Sbtne Use Only NRC Cutoff Initial Confirmatory LOD Testing? Comment Sbtne Levels? (Yes / No) Cutoff Cutoff (Yes / No) (Optional)

Alcohol IYes NotAplicable II Coca['""es"'s"".. LOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post CocineEvent and Followup specimens I I~LOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post Marijuana Yes Yes Event and Followup specimens Apea ine Ye YsLOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post Amphetamine__esYes, vent and Followup specimens Opiats r~5 i LOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post

[pae e .... ______

Yes______

"']

Event and Followup specimens PC YsLOD testing completed on Dilute, For Cause, Post

._.. vent and Followup specimens

• nnual Report Form (version 1.6.0 - December 19, 2014) - Page 1 of 2- NRC Form 891 (12/201,

Substances Tested - continued Summary of Management Actions - 26.71 7(b)(8)

Summarize actions implemented to improve FFD program performance. As applicable, reference in the topic description audit reports, 30-day reports, and/or corrective action reports. If reporting information on more than three topics, select "Others" for Topic 3 to report any additional topics.

Tonic 1 Topic 1 Description

• -.Program and System Management For the reporting period of 2015, eleven (11) individuals were denied unescorted access authorization after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type, two (2) follow-up tests were positive, five (5) pre-access tests were positive, and four (4) random tests were positive.

Follow-Up Positive Test Two (2) contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. These individuals were denied access.

One (1) follow-up test result was appealed. The appeal test result confirmed the original result.

Pre-Access Positive Test Two (2) initial contractor employee tested positive for marijuana. One (1) reinstatement less than 365 day contractor employee tested positive for cocaine. One (1) reinstatement less than 365 day L Topic 2 Topic 2 Description Blind Performance Test Samples For the 2015 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to St. Lucie Nuclear Plant's HHS-certified laboratory yielded expected results.

[] Add an additional Topic Person(s) Responsible for Information Provided Person 1 (required):

Robert 2

lBoskey Access/FFD Supervisor Robert.L.Boskey~nee.com First Name Last Name Position Title Company Email Address (optional):

Person Person 2 (optional):

First Name Last Name Position Title Company Email Address button has has beenand been selected all errors Final (i.e., those in NRC (Required).-

Step highlighted will consider red) have been corrected. authentic this form The in accordance "Validate & Lock" button 26.11 with will only when change to "Locked" after the&data the "Validate Lock"validation process successfully completed and the form is ready for submission.

L1LI~~IIZ1 Annual Report Form (version 1 *6.0 - December 19, 2014) -Page 2 of 2 - (12/2014) 891 (12/2014)

Annual Report Form (version 1.6.0 - December 19, 2014) Page2of2- NRC Form NRC Form 891