ML17352A495: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 12/18/2017
| issue date = 12/18/2017
| title = Order (Adopting Transcript Corrections)
| title = Order (Adopting Transcript Corrections)
| author name = Hawkens E R
| author name = Hawkens E
| author affiliation = NRC/ASLBP
| author affiliation = NRC/ASLBP
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = Legal-Order
| document type = Legal-Order
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
| revision = 0
| project =  
| stage = Other
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman Dr. Michael F. Kennedy Dr. Richard E. Wardwell In the Matter of                                    Docket No. 50-458-LR ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.                            ASLBP No. 17-956-01-LR-BD01 (River Bend, Unit 1)                                December 18, 2017 ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections)
Before this Board in the above captioned proceeding is a joint motion submitted by the partiesEntergy Operations, Inc., Sierra Club, and the NRC Staffrequesting that certain corrections be made to the transcript of the November 30, 2017 oral argument teleconference concerning contention admissibility. See Joint Proposed Corrections to the Transcript of the Oral Argument Held on November 30, 2017 (Dec. 14, 2017). This Board grants the joint motion. The transcript of the oral argument held on November 30, 2017 is hereby revised to incorporate the corrections identified in Appendix A to this Order.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
                                                              /RA/
E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Rockville, Maryland December 18, 2017
APPENDIX A CORRECTIONS TO THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 30, 2017 (DOCKET NO. 50-458-LR)
Page      Line(s)              Delete                        Insert 2        19        O-15D21                        O-14-A44 2        21        415-4126                      415-7000 6        14        arguing                        argument 6        21        Joseph                        Joe 6        25        Donohue                        Donoghue 8        24        to                            the 11        14        look                          looks 12        12        your advocation                your abdication 12        12        an advocation                  an abdication 12        22        advocating                    abdicating 14        14        hasnt                        isnt 14        16        advocated                      abdicated 14        22        advocate                      abdicate 14        23        advocated                      abdicated 15        18        alternative                    alternatives 20        1          sites                          cites 28        2          acceptable                    susceptible 29        9-10      progression, because          progression. Because 29        13-14      rule. Licensees              rule, licensees 33        4          page 1                        page 31 38        2          plan                          plant 44        11        against proposed              against the proposed 46        14-15      the same thing as test        a contention of 46        21        challenge                      challenged 46        22        2.209(f)(1)(6)                2.309(f)(1)(vi) 47        5          previous                      proposed 49        7          advocation                    abdication 49        11        advocation                    abdication 49        14        advocation                    abdication 51        2          contentions                    contention 51        9          competing                      conceding 52        8          that identified                that are identified 52        15        Contention 2 is                Contention 2 - - is 53        9-10      Louisiana and Sierra Club. You Louisiana, and Sierra Club seem to have                  seems to have 53        19        only a                        on a 54        21        compressor energy source      compressed air energy storage 54        23        license, and                  license, and
55 19    its suggestions.          its suggestions.
59 5    3.5.2.2.1                  3.5.2.2.2.1 59 6    3.5.2.2.3                  3.5.2.2.2.3 59 14    as we explain, includes    and as we explain, this includes 60 2    with Reaction for Aggregate from Reaction with Aggregate 61 1    then concrete              then concrete 62 3    put in                      put it in 63 20    free saw                    freeze-thaw 64 8    B-141                      B.1.41 64 12    GALL reports                GALL report 65 5    Roman eleven F6            XI.S6 65 10-11 Roman eleven. F6-4          XI S6-4 68 20    still-expanding            slow-expanding 70 15    as to builder              admissibility 72 5    excessively                explicitly 72 9    of fines                    applying 73 21    application                applications 73 23    to the ER                  a supplement to the GEIS 74 1    guidance                    GEIS 74 2    guidance                    GEIS 74 3    relief to develop          reason developed 74 8    reactions                  the action 74 11    guidance                    GEIS 74 13    with                        for 74 14    report                      reports 74 16    Likewise, echoes            Likewise, it echoes 74 22    2.235                      2.335 74 23    the full balance and        explaining the 74 25    for renewal                of the rule or 75 1    did not give a              would not serve the 75 5    the one                    is that one 75 8    Lucy                        Busey 75 9    staffs page 7              its reply to the staff on page 7 75 10    to the case                --
75 13    29                          28 75 19    Lucy                        Busey 75 24    blunt                      input 75 25    redaction                  action 76 4    scope                      GEIS 76 5    Its                        It does 76 22    review                      resource 76 25    review                      resource 77 4    review                      resource 77 6    review                      resource 78 6    workforce                  of course 2
78 12    since letting                  addressing 79 2    stress                        solar 79 7    or placement hours for within  as a replacement source for River Bend 79 18    2.09(F)(1)(5) and (6)          2.309(f)(1)(v) or (vi) 80 1    drywall                        drywell 80 2    F(1)(6)                        (f)(1)(vi) 80 4    petition, must                application, it must 80 10    The petition -- given petition The petitioner hasnt given in the petition 80 13-14 assumption. Categorically,    assumption that, categorically, 80 20    admission                      contention 81 4    vitiates that the              vitiates the 81 7    2.09(c)                        2.309(c) 81 13-14 the materials --              a material dispute --
86 5    B-141                          B.1.41 86 10    B-141                          B.1.41 86 15    B-141                          B.1.41 86 19    is of                          of 87 10    F(5), F(6)                    XI.S6 87 13    50                            Part 50 90 15    an                            in its 90 21    first                          first step 93 19    the initiatives under          theres new information on the 94 25    3.5.2.2.1                      3.5.2.2.2.1 3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of                                    )
                                                    )              Docket No. 50-458-LR ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.                            )
                                                    )
(River Bend Station, Unit 1 - License Renewal      )
Application)                                )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication          Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: O-16B33                                    Mail Stop: O-14A44 Washington, DC 20555-0001                            Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov                              Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.
David E. Roth, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                    Joe I. Gillespie, Esq.
Office of the Secretary of the Commission            E-mail: Sherwin.Turk@nrc.gov Mail Stop: O-16B33                                              David.Roth@nrc.gov Washington, DC 20555-0001                                      Joe.Gillespie@nrc.gov E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov Counsel for Entergy Operations, Inc.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel              Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                    1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Mail Stop T-3F23                                      Washington, DC 20004 Washington, DC 20555-0001                            Stephen Burdick, Esq.
E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman                              Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.
Dr. Michael F. Kennedy, Administrative Judge          E-mail: Stephen.Burdick@morganlewis.com Dr. Richard E. Wardwell, Administrative Judge                  Kathryn.Sutton@morganlewis.com Joseph D. McManus, Law Clerk Nicole L. Simmons, Law Clerk                          Counsel for Sierra Club E-mail: Roy.Hawkens@nrc.gov                          Wallace L. Taylor Michael.Kennedy@nrc.gov                      118 3rd Avenue, S.E., Suite 326 Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov                    Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 Joseph.McManuc@nrc.gov                      E-mail: wtaylorlaw@aol.com Lindsay.Simmons@nrc.gov
[Original signed by Brian Newell        ]
Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland, This 18th day of December, 2017}}

Latest revision as of 22:34, 3 February 2020

Order (Adopting Transcript Corrections)
ML17352A495
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/18/2017
From: Hawkens E
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
SECY RAS
References
50-458-LR, ASLBP 17-956-01-LR-BD01, RAS 54128
Download: ML17352A495 (5)


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:

E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman Dr. Michael F. Kennedy Dr. Richard E. Wardwell In the Matter of Docket No. 50-458-LR ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. ASLBP No. 17-956-01-LR-BD01 (River Bend, Unit 1) December 18, 2017 ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections)

Before this Board in the above captioned proceeding is a joint motion submitted by the partiesEntergy Operations, Inc., Sierra Club, and the NRC Staffrequesting that certain corrections be made to the transcript of the November 30, 2017 oral argument teleconference concerning contention admissibility. See Joint Proposed Corrections to the Transcript of the Oral Argument Held on November 30, 2017 (Dec. 14, 2017). This Board grants the joint motion. The transcript of the oral argument held on November 30, 2017 is hereby revised to incorporate the corrections identified in Appendix A to this Order.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

/RA/

E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Rockville, Maryland December 18, 2017

APPENDIX A CORRECTIONS TO THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 30, 2017 (DOCKET NO. 50-458-LR)

Page Line(s) Delete Insert 2 19 O-15D21 O-14-A44 2 21 415-4126 415-7000 6 14 arguing argument 6 21 Joseph Joe 6 25 Donohue Donoghue 8 24 to the 11 14 look looks 12 12 your advocation your abdication 12 12 an advocation an abdication 12 22 advocating abdicating 14 14 hasnt isnt 14 16 advocated abdicated 14 22 advocate abdicate 14 23 advocated abdicated 15 18 alternative alternatives 20 1 sites cites 28 2 acceptable susceptible 29 9-10 progression, because progression. Because 29 13-14 rule. Licensees rule, licensees 33 4 page 1 page 31 38 2 plan plant 44 11 against proposed against the proposed 46 14-15 the same thing as test a contention of 46 21 challenge challenged 46 22 2.209(f)(1)(6) 2.309(f)(1)(vi) 47 5 previous proposed 49 7 advocation abdication 49 11 advocation abdication 49 14 advocation abdication 51 2 contentions contention 51 9 competing conceding 52 8 that identified that are identified 52 15 Contention 2 is Contention 2 - - is 53 9-10 Louisiana and Sierra Club. You Louisiana, and Sierra Club seem to have seems to have 53 19 only a on a 54 21 compressor energy source compressed air energy storage 54 23 license, and license, and

55 19 its suggestions. its suggestions.

59 5 3.5.2.2.1 3.5.2.2.2.1 59 6 3.5.2.2.3 3.5.2.2.2.3 59 14 as we explain, includes and as we explain, this includes 60 2 with Reaction for Aggregate from Reaction with Aggregate 61 1 then concrete then concrete 62 3 put in put it in 63 20 free saw freeze-thaw 64 8 B-141 B.1.41 64 12 GALL reports GALL report 65 5 Roman eleven F6 XI.S6 65 10-11 Roman eleven. F6-4 XI S6-4 68 20 still-expanding slow-expanding 70 15 as to builder admissibility 72 5 excessively explicitly 72 9 of fines applying 73 21 application applications 73 23 to the ER a supplement to the GEIS 74 1 guidance GEIS 74 2 guidance GEIS 74 3 relief to develop reason developed 74 8 reactions the action 74 11 guidance GEIS 74 13 with for 74 14 report reports 74 16 Likewise, echoes Likewise, it echoes 74 22 2.235 2.335 74 23 the full balance and explaining the 74 25 for renewal of the rule or 75 1 did not give a would not serve the 75 5 the one is that one 75 8 Lucy Busey 75 9 staffs page 7 its reply to the staff on page 7 75 10 to the case --

75 13 29 28 75 19 Lucy Busey 75 24 blunt input 75 25 redaction action 76 4 scope GEIS 76 5 Its It does 76 22 review resource 76 25 review resource 77 4 review resource 77 6 review resource 78 6 workforce of course 2

78 12 since letting addressing 79 2 stress solar 79 7 or placement hours for within as a replacement source for River Bend 79 18 2.09(F)(1)(5) and (6) 2.309(f)(1)(v) or (vi) 80 1 drywall drywell 80 2 F(1)(6) (f)(1)(vi) 80 4 petition, must application, it must 80 10 The petition -- given petition The petitioner hasnt given in the petition 80 13-14 assumption. Categorically, assumption that, categorically, 80 20 admission contention 81 4 vitiates that the vitiates the 81 7 2.09(c) 2.309(c) 81 13-14 the materials -- a material dispute --

86 5 B-141 B.1.41 86 10 B-141 B.1.41 86 15 B-141 B.1.41 86 19 is of of 87 10 F(5), F(6) XI.S6 87 13 50 Part 50 90 15 an in its 90 21 first first step 93 19 the initiatives under theres new information on the 94 25 3.5.2.2.1 3.5.2.2.2.1 3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )

) Docket No. 50-458-LR ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. )

)

(River Bend Station, Unit 1 - License Renewal )

Application) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: O-16B33 Mail Stop: O-14A44 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.

David E. Roth, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Joe I. Gillespie, Esq.

Office of the Secretary of the Commission E-mail: Sherwin.Turk@nrc.gov Mail Stop: O-16B33 David.Roth@nrc.gov Washington, DC 20555-0001 Joe.Gillespie@nrc.gov E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov Counsel for Entergy Operations, Inc.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Mail Stop T-3F23 Washington, DC 20004 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Stephen Burdick, Esq.

E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

Dr. Michael F. Kennedy, Administrative Judge E-mail: Stephen.Burdick@morganlewis.com Dr. Richard E. Wardwell, Administrative Judge Kathryn.Sutton@morganlewis.com Joseph D. McManus, Law Clerk Nicole L. Simmons, Law Clerk Counsel for Sierra Club E-mail: Roy.Hawkens@nrc.gov Wallace L. Taylor Michael.Kennedy@nrc.gov 118 3rd Avenue, S.E., Suite 326 Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 Joseph.McManuc@nrc.gov E-mail: wtaylorlaw@aol.com Lindsay.Simmons@nrc.gov

[Original signed by Brian Newell ]

Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland, This 18th day of December, 2017