ML18309A227: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 11/09/2018
| issue date = 11/09/2018
| title = October 17, 2018, Summary of Public Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Nuclear Energy Institute and Industry Representatives-Industry Actions on Open Phase Conditions (NRC Bulletin 2012-01)
| title = October 17, 2018, Summary of Public Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Nuclear Energy Institute and Industry Representatives-Industry Actions on Open Phase Conditions (NRC Bulletin 2012-01)
| author name = Perkins L T
| author name = Perkins L
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| addressee name = Morey D C
| addressee name = Morey D
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| docket =  
| docket =  
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person = Perkins L T,  415-2375
| contact person = Perkins L,  415-2375
| case reference number = 2012-01
| case reference number = 2012-01
| document type = Meeting Summary
| document type = Meeting Summary
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:/RA/  
{{#Wiki_filter:November 9, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis C. Morey, Chief Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:                  Leslie Perkins, Project Manager /RA/
Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


for}}
==SUBJECT:==
 
==SUMMARY==
OF OCTOBER 17, 2018, PUBLIC MEETING BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE AND INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES-INDUSTRY ACTIONS ON OPEN PHASE CONDITIONS (NRC BULLETIN 2012-01)
On October 17, 2018, a Category 2 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) and nuclear power plant industry. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss industrys responses to NRC staff questions on the open phase condition (OPC) voluntary industry initiative (VII) in three topics of interest: (1) OPC protective actions, (2) updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) changes, and (3) Technical Specifications (TS) surveillance & limiting conditions for operation (LCO) requirements. This was a follow-up to a September 19, 2018 public meeting (meeting summary available at Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18268A346) where the NRC discussed questions for the industry of its implementation of the OPC VII. No regulatory decisions were made during this meeting.
The meeting began with introductions and opening remarks followed by a member of the technical specification tasks force (TSTF) providing their response to the staffs questions concerning surveillance & LCO TS requirements (ADAMS Accession No. ML18289A980).
Industry representatives also presented information to address the staffs questions on the above three topic areas (ADAMS Accession No. ML18289A992). During the discussion, industry provided responses and clarification to staffs questions on how the NEI VII is being implemented. For example, if the open phase isolation system (OPIS) is non-functional and unable to isolate an OPC, plant procedures would be followed and manual actions will be taken by the operators, including implementing compensatory measures until the OPIS is restored.
With respect to updating TSs, industry stated that the existing LCO 3.8.1, LCO 3.8.2, and SR 3.8.1.1 for offsite sources require offsite circuits to be operable and an OPC not to be present.
Additionally, industry determined that the OPIS does not satisfy any of the 10 CFR 50.36 criteria and should not be included in TSs. The industry described that the review of whether TS requirements would be applicable was conducted in 2015 and provided to the NRC staff
 
D. Morey                                      (ADAMS Accession No. ML18262A377). The NRC staff asked industry whether a comparison of protective relay settings for loss of offsite power and degraded voltage conditions was performed. The industry responded by stating that the OPIS is not similar to the protective relay settings associated with the degraded voltage conditions because the OPIS is installed as a non-safety related system that supports the performance of the safety function of the offsite power source by monitoring and separating an inoperable offsite source. Further, industry provided examples of other support systems for offsite power sources that do not require TSs.
Regarding UFSAR updates, industry presented examples that described the level of details for UFSAR updates in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e).
During the discussion, staff asked several clarifying questions on each topic of interest. At the end of meeting, NRC staff informed industry that it would use the information discussed in the public meetings, information provided by industry as part of its efforts to address OPC vulnerabilities, the staffs preliminary risk assessment on the impact of OPC (ADAMS Accession No. ML17234A631), and the functional criteria described in the November 25, 2014, NRC letter to NEI (ADAMS Accession No. ML15075A454) to determine whether the licensees are adequately addressing potential OPC vulnerabilities.
The industry anticipates sending a letter to formally respond to the NRC questions and address feedback provided by NRC staff during the meeting. The staff will consider this information in evaluating actions to close Bulletin 2012-01.
CONTACT: Leslie Perkins, DLP/PLPB (301) 415-2375
 
==Enclosures:==
 
List of Attendees NEI Slide Presentation TSTF Slide Presentation Meeting Notice
 
ML18309A227 Mtg. Summary; ML1829A980 NEI Slide Presentation; ML18289A992 TSTF Slide Presentation; ML18277A137, Mtg. Notice; ML18309A226, Package OFFICE    NRR/DLP/PLPB PM  NRR/DE/EEOB      NRR/DLP/PLPB/D        NRR/DLP/PLPB/PM NAME      LPerkins          JQuichocho        DMorey (JRowley for) LPerkins DATE      11/07/2018        11/07 /2018      11/9/2018            11/9/2018 List of Attendees Names                          Organization Mitch Mathews                      Exelon Kazimierz Leja                      Exelon Robert Carritte                    MPR Associates Brian Mann                          EXCEL Services Corporation Stephen Geier                      Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
Frances Pimentel                    NEI Maggie Staizes                      NEI Greg Krueger                        NEI ED Miller                          U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Ed Miller                          NRC Roy Mathew                          NRC Margaret Chernoff                  NRC Sarah Elkhiamy                    NRC Jessie Guichocho                    NRC Jeremy Bowen                        NRC Leslie Perkins                      NRC G.S. Matharu                        NRC W. Orders                          NRC H. Kodali                          NRC Peter Snyder                      NRC Glenn Dentel                        NRC David Decker                        NRC Guillermo Crespo                    NRC Hassan Movafegh                    Talen Energy - affiliated with Susquehanna plants Mike Wiwel                          PSEG Nuclear Jeffrey Krov                        Pacific Gas and Electric Company David Hantman                      Pacific Gas and Electric Company Gary Miller                        Dominion Energy Greg Miller                        Dominion Energy Kelvin Ali                          Sargent & Lundy James Reynolds                      Sargent & Lundy Joe Krvavac                        Sargent & Lundy Boyd Shingleton                    Duke Energy Wesley Kijowski                    Duke Energy Elizabeth Hare                      DTE Energy Susan Richards                      DC Cook Thomas Braudt                      Certrec Gregory Norris                      Entergy Services Mike Mustafa                        Entergy Services Mark Rice                          Entergy Northwest Tamatha Womack                      Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)
Preston Cooper                      TVA Christopher Riedl                  TVA Jana Bergman                        Curtiss-Wright Enclosure
 
Names                  Organization Gregg Reimers            Public Bob Hirmanpour            Southern Nuclear Brian Cates              Southern Nuclear Cheryl Gayheart          Southern Nuclear Bonnie Goodwin            Southern Nuclear Saed Almajdoubah          Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Larry Parker              Stars Alliance Ayodele Ishola-Salawu    NextEra Energy Nuclear Fleet
                        }}

Latest revision as of 15:48, 2 February 2020

October 17, 2018, Summary of Public Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Nuclear Energy Institute and Industry Representatives-Industry Actions on Open Phase Conditions (NRC Bulletin 2012-01)
ML18309A227
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/09/2018
From: Leslie Perkins
NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
To: Dennis Morey
NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
Perkins L, 415-2375
References
2012-01
Download: ML18309A227 (5)


Text

November 9, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis C. Morey, Chief Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Leslie Perkins, Project Manager /RA/

Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF OCTOBER 17, 2018, PUBLIC MEETING BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE AND INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES-INDUSTRY ACTIONS ON OPEN PHASE CONDITIONS (NRC BULLETIN 2012-01)

On October 17, 2018, a Category 2 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) and nuclear power plant industry. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss industrys responses to NRC staff questions on the open phase condition (OPC) voluntary industry initiative (VII) in three topics of interest: (1) OPC protective actions, (2) updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) changes, and (3) Technical Specifications (TS) surveillance & limiting conditions for operation (LCO) requirements. This was a follow-up to a September 19, 2018 public meeting (meeting summary available at Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18268A346) where the NRC discussed questions for the industry of its implementation of the OPC VII. No regulatory decisions were made during this meeting.

The meeting began with introductions and opening remarks followed by a member of the technical specification tasks force (TSTF) providing their response to the staffs questions concerning surveillance & LCO TS requirements (ADAMS Accession No. ML18289A980).

Industry representatives also presented information to address the staffs questions on the above three topic areas (ADAMS Accession No. ML18289A992). During the discussion, industry provided responses and clarification to staffs questions on how the NEI VII is being implemented. For example, if the open phase isolation system (OPIS) is non-functional and unable to isolate an OPC, plant procedures would be followed and manual actions will be taken by the operators, including implementing compensatory measures until the OPIS is restored.

With respect to updating TSs, industry stated that the existing LCO 3.8.1, LCO 3.8.2, and SR 3.8.1.1 for offsite sources require offsite circuits to be operable and an OPC not to be present.

Additionally, industry determined that the OPIS does not satisfy any of the 10 CFR 50.36 criteria and should not be included in TSs. The industry described that the review of whether TS requirements would be applicable was conducted in 2015 and provided to the NRC staff

D. Morey (ADAMS Accession No. ML18262A377). The NRC staff asked industry whether a comparison of protective relay settings for loss of offsite power and degraded voltage conditions was performed. The industry responded by stating that the OPIS is not similar to the protective relay settings associated with the degraded voltage conditions because the OPIS is installed as a non-safety related system that supports the performance of the safety function of the offsite power source by monitoring and separating an inoperable offsite source. Further, industry provided examples of other support systems for offsite power sources that do not require TSs.

Regarding UFSAR updates, industry presented examples that described the level of details for UFSAR updates in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e).

During the discussion, staff asked several clarifying questions on each topic of interest. At the end of meeting, NRC staff informed industry that it would use the information discussed in the public meetings, information provided by industry as part of its efforts to address OPC vulnerabilities, the staffs preliminary risk assessment on the impact of OPC (ADAMS Accession No. ML17234A631), and the functional criteria described in the November 25, 2014, NRC letter to NEI (ADAMS Accession No. ML15075A454) to determine whether the licensees are adequately addressing potential OPC vulnerabilities.

The industry anticipates sending a letter to formally respond to the NRC questions and address feedback provided by NRC staff during the meeting. The staff will consider this information in evaluating actions to close Bulletin 2012-01.

CONTACT: Leslie Perkins, DLP/PLPB (301) 415-2375

Enclosures:

List of Attendees NEI Slide Presentation TSTF Slide Presentation Meeting Notice

ML18309A227 Mtg. Summary; ML1829A980 NEI Slide Presentation; ML18289A992 TSTF Slide Presentation; ML18277A137, Mtg. Notice; ML18309A226, Package OFFICE NRR/DLP/PLPB PM NRR/DE/EEOB NRR/DLP/PLPB/D NRR/DLP/PLPB/PM NAME LPerkins JQuichocho DMorey (JRowley for) LPerkins DATE 11/07/2018 11/07 /2018 11/9/2018 11/9/2018 List of Attendees Names Organization Mitch Mathews Exelon Kazimierz Leja Exelon Robert Carritte MPR Associates Brian Mann EXCEL Services Corporation Stephen Geier Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)

Frances Pimentel NEI Maggie Staizes NEI Greg Krueger NEI ED Miller U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Ed Miller NRC Roy Mathew NRC Margaret Chernoff NRC Sarah Elkhiamy NRC Jessie Guichocho NRC Jeremy Bowen NRC Leslie Perkins NRC G.S. Matharu NRC W. Orders NRC H. Kodali NRC Peter Snyder NRC Glenn Dentel NRC David Decker NRC Guillermo Crespo NRC Hassan Movafegh Talen Energy - affiliated with Susquehanna plants Mike Wiwel PSEG Nuclear Jeffrey Krov Pacific Gas and Electric Company David Hantman Pacific Gas and Electric Company Gary Miller Dominion Energy Greg Miller Dominion Energy Kelvin Ali Sargent & Lundy James Reynolds Sargent & Lundy Joe Krvavac Sargent & Lundy Boyd Shingleton Duke Energy Wesley Kijowski Duke Energy Elizabeth Hare DTE Energy Susan Richards DC Cook Thomas Braudt Certrec Gregory Norris Entergy Services Mike Mustafa Entergy Services Mark Rice Entergy Northwest Tamatha Womack Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)

Preston Cooper TVA Christopher Riedl TVA Jana Bergman Curtiss-Wright Enclosure

Names Organization Gregg Reimers Public Bob Hirmanpour Southern Nuclear Brian Cates Southern Nuclear Cheryl Gayheart Southern Nuclear Bonnie Goodwin Southern Nuclear Saed Almajdoubah Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Larry Parker Stars Alliance Ayodele Ishola-Salawu NextEra Energy Nuclear Fleet