ML18352A921: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:January 17, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO:
{{#Wiki_filter:January 17, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO:                 Frederick D. Brown, Director Office of New Reactors Catherine Haney, Regional Administrator Region II FROM:                           Timothy J. McGinty, Director /RA/
Frederick D. Brown, Director Office of New Reactors Catherine Haney, Regional Administrator Region II FROM:   Timothy J. McGinty , Director /RA/ Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs Office of New Reactors William B. Jones, Director
Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs Office of New Reactors William B. Jones, Director   /RA/
/RA/ Division of Construction Oversight Region II
Division of Construction Oversight Region II


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS FROM THE 2017 INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES, AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA DEMONSTRATION PROJECT On June 1, 2017, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Office of New Reactors (NRO) issued an Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) Closure and Verification Demonstration Final Report (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Numbers ML17135A415
COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS FROM THE 2017 INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES, AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA DEMONSTRATION PROJECT On June 1, 2017, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Office of New Reactors (NRO) issued an Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) Closure and Verification Demonstration Final Report (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Numbers ML17135A415). The purpose of this document was to evaluate the readiness and reliability of the ITAAC inspection and verification process, specifically during the last year of construction for the new units under construction. As a part of this effort, the NRC conducted two public meetings. The first was a Category II public meeting on April 24, 2017, described in a memo dated May 18, 2017 ([ADAMS] No. ML17129A262), to demonstrate the agencys capacity to complete ITAAC inspections and notification reviews and validate the agencys agility and decision making processes for handling peak workloads. The second was a Category I public meeting held on December 12, 2017 which was structured to provide the status of staffs action from the 2017 ITAAC demonstration project, and to work through the closeout process of two example ITAAC from consolidation amendments.
). The purpose of this document was to evaluate the readiness and reliability of the ITAAC inspection and verification process, specifically during the last year of construction for the new units under construction. As a part of this effort, the NRC conducted two public meetings. The first was a Category II public meeting on April 24, 2017
Pursuant to the September 29, 2017, memorandum to you (ADAMS Accession No. ML17263A152), an action plan was developed with deliverable milestones to implement the recommendations of the final report. The action plan was included as enclosure 1 of that CONTACT:         Ian Cozens, NRO/DCIP/CIPB (301) 415-6203
, described in a memo dated May 18, 2017 ([ADAMS] No. ML17129A262), to demonstrate the agency's capacity to complete ITAAC inspections and notification reviews and validate the agency's agility and decision making processes for handling peak workloads. The second was a Category I public meeting held on December 12, 2017 which was structured to provide the status of staff's action from the 2017 ITAAC demonstration project, and to work through the closeout process of two example ITAAC from consolidation amendments.
 
Pursuant to the September 29, 2017
F. Brown et al.                           memo. The recommendations from the final report have been implemented as appropriate and are detailed in enclosure 1 of this memo.
, memorandum to you (ADAMS Acc ession No. ML17263A152
), an action plan was developed with deliverable milestones to implement the recommendations of the final report. Th e action plan was included as enclosure 1 of that CONTACT: Ian Cozens
, NRO/DCIP/CIPB (301) 415-6203 F. Brown et al. memo. The recommendations from the final report have been implemented as appropriate and are detailed in enclosure 1 of this memo.


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
Line 32: Line 29:
ITAAC Demonstration Project Action Plan Summary
ITAAC Demonstration Project Action Plan Summary


ML18352A921 *via e-mail NRC-001 OFFICE NRO/DCIP NRO/DCIP RII/DCO RII/DCO NAME OAyegbusi TMcGinty NCoovert* WJones DATE 12/19/18 12/21/18 01/17/19 12/21/18 Enclosure
ML18352A921             *via e-mail       NRC-001 OFFICE NRO/DCIP             NRO/DCIP   RII/DCO       RII/DCO NAME       OAyegbusi         TMcGinty   NCoovert*     WJones DATE       12/19/18         12/21/18   01/17/19       12/21/18


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
ITAAC Demonstration Project Action Plan Completion Summary Recommendation Detailed Action Items Completion Details Weekly Public Meetings
ITAAC Demonstration Project Action Plan Completion Summary Recommendation                             Detailed Action Items                   Completion Details Weekly Public Meetings
: 1. Utilize weekly public meetings to facilitate resolution of critical issues associated with Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) closure notification (ICN) and uncompleted ITAAC closure notification (UIN) reviews, including items such as the intent of an ITAAC, ICNs with challenges, methods for resolution of issues, and informed decision making.
: 1. Utilize weekly public meetings to       NRC-REG-103, Inspections, Tests,        Completed - 1 Qtr. 2018 facilitate resolution of critical issues Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria associated with Inspections, Tests,     [ITAAC] Closure Verification Process,    Staff are currently using weekly public Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria       will be updated and publicly released to  meetings to efficiently discuss and (ITAAC) closure notification (ICN)       include process and the purpose of        address notification issues. The office and uncompleted ITAAC closure           meeting.                                  instruction (OI) NRO-REG-103 notification (UIN) reviews, including                                             Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and items such as the intent of an ITAAC,                                             Acceptance Criteria [ITAAC] Closure ICNs with challenges, methods for                                                 Verification Process, has been resolution of issues, and informed                                                 updated to include this process. The decision making.                                                                  OI was made publicly available in 2nd Qtr. 2018.
In addition, establish standing agenda items during the weekly public meeting to discuss expected ICN submittal workloads to allow early notification of resource needs and critical process points.
In addition, establish standing agenda items during the weekly public meeting to discuss expected ICN submittal workloads to allow early notification of resource needs and critical process points.
Increase the frequency of public meetings to accelerate the resolution of emerging ITAAC closure issues as the surge approaches.
Increase the frequency of public meetings to accelerate the resolution of emerging ITAAC closure issues as the surge approaches.
NRC-REG-103, "Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria
Enclosure
[ITAAC] Closure Verification Process," will be updated and publicly released to include process and the purpose of meeting. Completed
 
- 1 Qtr. 2018 Staff are currently using weekly public meetings to efficiently discuss and address notification issues. The office instruction (OI) NRO
-REG-103 "Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria [ITAAC]
Closure Verification Process," has been updated to include this process. The OI was made publicly available in 2 nd Qtr. 2018.
Clarity in Existing Industry Guidance
Clarity in Existing Industry Guidance
: 2. Develop an FAQ
: 2. Develop an FAQ-type process to         Assess existing guidance and determine      Completed - 4 Qtr. 2018 provide a forum to document           if there is still a need for new process to discussions and resolutions of issues  deal with generic issues associated with   Recommendation is addressed via the associated with the content of ICNs    the content of ITAAC notifications, or if   public meeting process facilitated by and UINs, which may be due to gaps    issues will be dealt under the public       recommendation 1. Discussions in existing guidance or interpretation meeting process in Recommendation 1.       regarding the resolution of issues discrepancies.                                                                    associated with the content of ICNs and Document staff assessment.                  UINs are held during the routine weekly public meetings.
-type process to provide a forum to document discussions and resolutions of issues associated with the content of ICNs and UINs, which may be due to gaps in existing guidance or interpretation discrepancies.
Assess existing guidance and determine if there is still a need for new process to deal with generic issues associated with the content of ITAAC notifications, or if issues will be dealt under the public meeting process in Recommendation 1.
Document staff assessment.
Completed
- 4 Qtr. 2018 Recommendation is addressed via the public meeting process facilitated by recommendation 1. Discussions regarding the resolution of issues associated with the content of ICNs and UINs are held during the routine weekly public meetings.
Complex ITAAC
Complex ITAAC
: 3. Work with stakeholders to identify complex ITAAC issues by reviewing early submittals of uncompleted ITAAC notifications and develop clear expectations for the content of the associated ICN submittals. This effort will include identifying when complex ITAAC will be completed during the construction schedule.
: 3. Work with stakeholders to identify     Update and publicly release NRC-REG-       Completed - 4 Qtr. 2017 complex ITAAC issues by reviewing      103 to capture definition of complex early submittals of uncompleted        ITAAC, how complex ITAAC are               The Category I public meeting held on ITAAC notifications and develop clear  assessed, and how issues will be           December 12, 2017, facilitated a expectations for the content of the    resolved.                                  discussion of complex ITAAC. The associated ICN submittals. This                                                    public meeting summary is available effort will include identifying when                                              (ADAMs Accession No. ML17129A262) complex ITAAC will be completed during the construction schedule.                                                  The resolution of many issues related to complex ITAAC were determined to be inspection related, and has not been captured in NRO-REG-103 due to being outside the scope of the office instruction. The term complex ITAAC has been replaced with high schedule risk ITAAC, and associated issues are resolved on an as needed basis.
Update and publicly release NRC
-REG-103 to capture definition of complex ITAAC, how complex ITAAC are assessed, and how issues will be resolved. Completed
- 4 Qtr. 2017  The Category I public meeting held on December 12, 2017
, facilitated a discussion of complex ITAAC. The public meeting summary is available (ADAMs Accession No. ML17129A262)
The resolution of many issues related to complex ITAAC were determined to be inspection related, and has not been captured in NRO
-REG-103 due to being outside the scope of the office instruction. The term complex ITAAC has been replaced with high schedule risk ITAAC, and associated issues are resolved on an as needed basis.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Processes Guidance Enhancement
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Processes Guidance Enhancement
: 4. Revise applicable NRO office instructions to ensure lessons learned and enhancements for the ICN process, identified during this demonstration project, are Update and publicly release NRC-REG-103 to capture: 1) lessons learned and enhancements to the ITAAC review process that enable Completed
: 4. Revise applicable NRO office           Update and publicly release                Completed - 1 Qtr. 2018 instructions to ensure lessons         NRC-REG-103 to capture:
- 1 Qtr. 2018  Revisions to NRO
learned and enhancements for the                                                   Revisions to NRO-REG-103 include the ICN process, identified during this    1) lessons learned and enhancements to      criteria for technical reviewer demonstration project, are            the ITAAC review process that enable        assignment, ending the requirement of institutionalized. The revision should staff to resolve ITAAC closure issues        completing half of targeted ITAAC before include, but is not limited to, the     consistently and efficiently                completing verification of non-targeted development of the criteria of when                                                 ITAAC within an ITAAC family, and technical reviewer referral is needed   2) the evaluation of the requirement of      process improvement points for review of during the reviews of ITAAC             completing half of targeted ITAAC before    ICNs, UINs, and ITAAC post closure notifications, the evaluation of the   completing verification of non-targeted      notifications (IPCNs).
-REG-103 include the criteria for technical reviewer assignment, ending the requirement of institutionalized. The revision should include, but is not limited to, the development of the criteria of when technical reviewer referral is needed during the reviews of ITAAC notifications, the evaluation of the requirement of completing half of targeted ITAAC before completing verification of non
requirement of completing half of       ITAAC within an ITAAC family targeted ITAAC before completing verification of non-targeted ITAAC     3) criteria for including technical reviewer within an ITAAC family, and the         during reviews of ITAAC notifications involvement of technical staff for all ITAAC notifications related to security and emergency-preparedness.
-targeted ITAAC within an ITAAC family, and the involvement of technical staff for all ITAAC notifications related to security and emergency
Make the revised NRC office instruction NRO-REG-103 publicly available to give stakeholders insight into the NRCs ITAAC notification review process.
-preparedness.
Make the revised NRC office instruction NRO
-REG-103 publicly available to give stakeholders insight into the NRC's ITAAC notification review process.
staff to resolve ITAAC closure issues consistently and efficiently
: 2) the evaluation of the requirement of completing half of targeted ITAAC before completing verification of non
-targeted ITAAC within an ITAAC family
: 3) criteria for including technical reviewer during reviews of ITAAC notifications completing half of targeted ITAAC before completing verification of non
-targeted ITAAC within an ITAAC family, and process improvement points for review of ICNs, UINs, and ITAAC post closure notifications (IPCNs).
Enhance NRC processes for ITAAC inspection and documentation
Enhance NRC processes for ITAAC inspection and documentation
: 5. Enhance NRC processes, including associated governing documents, communications, and training, to ensure timely identification and resolution of concerns or findings material to ITAAC, such that ITAAC inspection results support key activities and milestones in the ITAAC closure verification process.
: 5. Enhance NRC processes, including       Complete each of the following items for    Completed - 2 Qtr. 2018 associated governing documents,         NRC processes TARs, URIs, ITAAC communications, and training, to       inspection findings, allegations, and        Staff developed metrics and other ensure timely identification and       IPCNs.                                      process enhancements for inspection resolution of concerns or findings                                                   inputs and ICN schedules. The region material to ITAAC, such that ITAAC       1) Pilot process enhancement for two       completed a pilot on these items to inspection results support key              topics: Inspection Inputs and ICN       evaluate methodology and capture activities and milestones in the            Inspection Schedule Accountability,     lessons learned for other metrics.
: a. Enhance/develop, as applicable, the following processes: technical assistance requests (TARs), unresolved items (URIs), ITAAC inspection findings, allegations and Complete each of the following items for NRC processes TARs, URIs, ITAAC inspection findings, allegations, and IPCNs. 1) Pilot process enhancement for two topics: Inspection Inputs and ICN Inspection Schedule Accountability, in order to identify lessons learned and incorporate into the Action Plan for other processes.
ITAAC closure verification process.          in order to identify lessons learned and incorporate into the Action Plan   From the lessons learned, staff
: a. Develop timeliness metrics for Inspection Inputs and ICN Completed
: a. Enhance/develop, as applicable, the          for other processes.                   developed metrics on TAR execution, following processes: technical                                                      URIs, ITAAC findings, and IPCNs. No assistance requests (TARs),                  a. Develop timeliness metrics for      additional staff guidance was needed for unresolved items (URIs), ITAAC                    Inspection Inputs and ICN          these processes. For allegations, a inspection findings, allegations and petitions, and IPCNs. For TARS,             Inspection Schedule              metric was developed along with consider the frequency of performing       Accountability.                  additional guidance.
- 2 Qtr. 2018  Staff developed metrics and other process enhancements for inspection inputs and ICN schedules. The region completed a pilot on these items to evaluate methodology and capture lessons learned for other metrics.
this process; the timeliness of TAR     b. Execute pilot and evaluate processing; and interactions with           effectiveness of metrics and      A change management plan was licensees for visibility purposes.         process enhancements.            developed for training needs and internal
From the lessons learned, staff developed metrics on TAR execution, URIs, ITAAC findings, and IPCNs. No additional staff guidance was needed for these processes. For allegations, a petitions, and IPCNs. For TARS, consider the frequency of performing this process; the timeliness of TAR processing; and interactions with licensees for visibility purposes.
: c. Finalize metrics from pilot lesson communications. External
: b. For inspection findings, consider enforcement actions and internally and externally disputed findings. Consider which NRC process activities, if any, can be done in parallel with the evaluation of an ITAAC technical concer
: b. For inspection findings, consider           learned.                          communications with the public and the enforcement actions and internally     d. Incorporate lessons learned into  licensee regarding timely identification and externally disputed findings.           the development process of        and resolution of concerns or findings Consider which NRC process                 additional timeliness metrics    material to ITAAC occurs at a minimum activities, if any, can be done in         (Step 2).                        bi-annually.
: n. Inspection Schedule Accountability.
parallel with the evaluation of an ITAAC technical concern.             2) Develop process enhancements for the following areas: TARs, URIs, ITAAC inspection findings, allegations and petitions, and IPCNs.
: b. Execute pilot and evaluate effectiveness of metrics and process enhancements.
: a. Develop timeliness metrics for the above areas.
: c. Finalize metrics from pilot lesson learned. d. Incorporate lessons learned into the development process of additional timeliness metrics (Step 2). 2) Develop process enhancements for the following areas: TARs, URIs, ITAAC inspection findings, allegations and petitions, and IPCNs. a. Develop timeliness metrics for the above areas.
: b. Execute and evaluate effectiveness of metrics and process enhancements.
: b. Execute and evaluate effectiveness of metrics and process enhancements.
: c. Finalize metrics from lesson learned. d. Incorporate lessons learned into the development process of additional timeliness metrics, as determined.
: c. Finalize metrics from lesson learned.
: 3) Determine if additional guidance is needed for each process affecting ITAAC closures. Create working level guidance (i.e. Desktop Guides) for RII and NRO staff. Revision of guidance documents, such as metric was developed along with additional guidance. A change management plan was developed for training needs and internal communications.
: d. Incorporate lessons learned into the development process of additional timeliness metrics, as determined.
External communications with the public and the licensee regarding timely identification and resolution of concerns or findings material to ITAAC occurs at a minimum bi-annually.
: 3) Determine if additional guidance is needed for each process affecting ITAAC closures. Create working level guidance (i.e. Desktop Guides) for RII and NRO staff. Revision of guidance documents, such as inspection manual chapters (IMCs) and inspection procedures (IPs), will be completed under the regularly scheduled update for each of those documents.
inspection manual chapters (IMCs) and inspection procedures (IPs), will be completed under the regularly scheduled update for each of those documents.
: 4) Develop and implement change management plan for training needs and communication plan, which includes follow up public meeting, with the licensee and the public.
: 4) Develop and implement change management plan for training needs and communication plan, which includes follow up public meeting, with the licensee and the public.
Performance Dashboards
Performance Dashboards
: 6. Create an integrated, highly visible, internal, color
: 6. Create an integrated, highly visible, Develop performance dashboards to          Completed - 4 Qtr. 2017 internal, color-coded performance     track the status and timeliness of ICN dashboard to track the status of each reviews and ITAAC inspections based on Dashboards were developed to provide step for ICN reviews and inspection  program metrics.                          the ongoing status of ICNs currently process for early identification of                                              under review to NRC management and ITAAC closure related issues for      Develop performance dashboards for        for public information. The dashboards management attention and              inspections that affect ITAAC closures to provide the status of each ICN and UIN resolution.                          highlight issues based on program          under review, the number received and metrics.                                  closed per month, and the length of time Specific process steps to measure                                                in review per month.
-coded performance dashboard to track the status of each step for ICN reviews and inspection process for early identification of ITAAC closure related issues for management attention and resolution.
should include:
Specific process steps to measure should include:
* The status of each step for ICN                                                Dashboards related to inspections have reviews.                                                                    also been developed. These
The status of each step for ICN reviews. Key aspects of the inspection process, including the timeliness of report issuance, inspection initiators, and inspection outcomes. Potential inspection scheduling or resource issues.
* Key aspects of the inspection                                                  dashboards track the inspection process, including the timeliness                                            completion status versus those ICNs of report issuance, inspection                                              which have been submitted, and the initiators, and inspection                                                  ITAAC inspection plan completion rate.
Develop performance dashboards to track the status and timeliness of ICN reviews and ITAAC inspections based on program metrics
outcomes.
. Develop performance dashboards for inspections that affect ITAAC closures to highlight issues based on program metrics. Completed
* Potential inspection scheduling or                                            The ICN and UIN review dashboards resource issues.                                                            have been developed and are currently being shared through the NRCs public website.
- 4 Qtr. 2017  Dashboards were developed to provide the ongoing status of ICNs currently under review to NRC management and for public information. The dashboards provide the status of each ICN and UIN under review, the number received and closed per month, and the length of time in review per month.
Dashboards related to inspections have also been developed. These dashboards track the inspection completion status versus those ICNs which have been submitted, and the ITAAC inspection plan completion rate.
The ICN and UIN review dashboards have been developed and are currently being shared through the NRCs public website.
Inspection Scheduling Efficiency
Inspection Scheduling Efficiency
: 7. Determine the most efficient location and time for inspections. Continue to focus on short
: 7. Determine the most efficient location   Incorporate scheduling process lessons      Completed - 2 Qtr. 2018 and time for inspections. Continue to   learned into Desktop Guide(s) including focus on short-duration construction     decision making on how to schedule          Scheduling process lessons learned activities, such as installing the       different types of inspections.              have been incorporated into a desktop reactor vessel, which are unlikely to                                                 guide. These lessons learned include be repeated for additional inspection   Produce a schedule of pre-op test           decision making on how to schedule opportunities.                           procedure reviews and tests to verify       different types of inspections.
-duration construction activities, such as installing the reactor vessel, which are unlikely to be repeated for additional inspection opportunities.
inspections are scheduled ahead of           Additionally a schedule of pre-Additionally, verify that test procedure tests.                                      operational test procedure reviews and inspections are scheduled when                                                        process to verify inspections are procedures are issued and available                                                  scheduled ahead of tests has been versus when the tests are being                                                      produced.
Additionally, verify that test procedure inspections are scheduled when procedures are issued and available versus when the tests are being performed.
performed.
Incorporate scheduling process lessons learned into Desktop Guide(s) including decision making on how to schedule different types of inspections.
Timeliness of Inspection Reports
Produce a schedule of pre
: 8. Establish timeliness requirements for   Review existing process(s) for inspection    Completed - 3 Qtr. 2018 inspection disposition including        report timeliness requirements, including inspection completion in CIPIMS and     dispositioning inspection findings for      IMC 0613 was updated during its inspection report issuance to support   potential efficiencies.                      regularly scheduled revision. In addition, the ITAAC surge and the Title 10 of                                                  IMC 0613 captures the issuance of the Code of Federal Regulations         Create or revise working level guidance      reports independent of the quarterly (10 CFR) 52.103(g) finding.             (i.e. Desktop Guides) for RII and NRO       inspection report to document ITAAC staff to capture efficiencies for inspection inspections as the scheduled fuel load report timeliness. Revision of guidance     approaches. Final inspection reports do documents, such as IMCs and IPs, will       not need to be issued for the 52.103(g) be completed under the regularly            finding to be made by staff, however the scheduled update for each of those          NRC does require that all inspections are documents.                                  complete and no findings were issued.
-op test procedure reviews and tests to verify inspections are scheduled ahead of tests. Completed
- 2 Qtr. 2018  Scheduling process lessons learned have been incorporated into a desktop guide. These lessons learned include decision making on how to schedule different types of inspections. Additionally a schedule of pre
-operational test procedure reviews and process to verify inspections are scheduled ahead of tests has been produced. Timeliness of Inspection Reports
: 8. Establish timeliness requirements for inspection disposition including inspection completion in CIPIMS and inspection report issuance to support the ITAAC surge and the Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 52.103(g) finding.
Review existing process(s) for inspection report timeliness requirements, including dispositioning inspection findings for potential efficiencies.
Create or revise working level guidance (i.e. Desktop Guides) for RII and NRO staff to capture efficiencies for inspection report timeliness. Revision of guidance documents, such as IMCs and IPs, will be completed under the regularly scheduled update for each of those documents.
Completed
- 3 Qtr. 2018  IMC 0613 was updated during its regularly scheduled revision. In addition, IMC 0613 captures the issuance of reports independent of the quarterly inspection report to document ITAAC inspections as the scheduled fuel load approaches. Final inspection reports do not need to be issued for the 52.103(g) finding to be made by staff, however the NRC does require that all inspections are complete and no findings were issued.
Maintain Qualified Staff
Maintain Qualified Staff
: 9. To ensure continued ICN review and inspection capacity, cross
: 9. To ensure continued ICN review and       Update and publicly release                  Completed - 1 Qtr. 2018 inspection capacity, cross-train         NRC-REG-103 to capture the additional staff to support ICN          cross-training procedure, including         The office instruction NRO-REG-103 has workflow capacities and ITAAC            developing a metric to track amount of       been updated to capture the inspections.                            staff cross-trained and number of ICN       cross-training procedure in Appendix A5.
-train additional staff to support ICN workflow capacities and ITAAC inspections.
reviewed in a given year to maintain      Construction inspector qualification has For inspector qualification, the NRC will   proficiency in ICN reviews.               been incorporated into IMC 1245 incorporate construction inspector          Construction inspector qualification will Appendix C-15 which cross-qualifies new training into IMC-1245.                    be incorporated into IMC 1245            construction inspectors for plants being Appendix C-15                            constructed under 10 CFR Part 52.
Update and publicly release NRC-REG-103 to capture the cross-training procedure, including developing a metric to track amount of staff cross
-trained and number of ICN Completed
- 1 Qtr. 2018  The office instruction NRO
-REG-103 has been updated to capture the cross-training procedure in Appendix A5.
For inspector qualification, the NRC will incorporate construction inspector training into IMC
-1245. reviewed in a given year to maintain proficiency in ICN reviews.
Construction inspector qualification will be incorporated into IMC 1245 Appendix C-15  Construction inspector qualification has been incorporated into IMC 1245 Appendix C
-15 which cross
-qualifies new construction inspectors for plants being constructed under 10 CFR Part 52.
Organizational Structures
Organizational Structures
: 10. Establish a temporary organizational structure with senior executive leadership approximately 12 months before projected fuel load. This organization would oversee and coordinate the ITAAC closure verification process to ensure appropriate decision making and the prompt identification and resolution of issues. Develop and capture in a memorandum the criteria for establishing a temporary organization to oversee the ITAA C closure verification process.
: 10. Establish a temporary organizational   Develop and capture in a memorandum       Completed - 1 Qtr. 2018 structure with senior executive        the criteria for establishing a temporary leadership approximately 12 months      organization to oversee the ITAAC        This was developed as part of the Vogtle before projected fuel load. This        closure verification process.            Readiness Group (VRG) Charter organization would oversee and                                                    (ML18059A273). The VRGs primary coordinate the ITAAC closure                                                      objective is to identify and resolve any verification process to ensure                                                    licensing, inspection, or regulatory appropriate decision making and the                                              challenges or gaps that could impact the prompt identification and resolution of                                          schedule for completion of Vogtle Units 3 issues.                                                                          and 4. To accomplish this objective, the VRG will provide high-level assessments, coordination, oversight, and management direction of NRC activities associated with the licensing, inspection, testing, and operation of Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Each of the NRC offices/region and associated staff retains responsibility for the activities related to licensing, inspection, and assessment of Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under their purview.
Completed
The VRG will provide periodic status updates to the Directors of NRO and NRR and the Regional Administrator, Region II. These periodic updates will include information on topics such as license reviews; ITAAC inspections; ICNs; operational programs; initial test programs; and startup activities. The updates will also include the status of hearings, contentions, late-filed allegations, inspection issues, and licensing activities that could impact the project, as applicable. The Directors of NRO and NRR, Region II Regional Administrator, and VRG co-chairs will determine the frequency of the updates.
- 1 Qtr. 2018  This was developed as part of the Vogtle Readiness Group (VRG) Charter (ML18059A273). The VRG's primary objective is to identify and resolve any licensing, inspection, or regulatory challenges or gaps that could impact the schedule for completion of Vogtle Units 3 and 4. To accomplish this objective, the VRG will provide high
-level assessments, coordination, oversight, and management direction of NRC activities associated with the licensing, inspection, testing, and operation of Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Each of the NRC offices/region and associated staff retains responsibility for the activities related to licensing, inspection, and assessment of Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under their purview.
The VRG will provide periodic status updates to the Directors of NRO and NRR and the Regional Administrator, Region II. These periodic updates will include information on topics such as license reviews; ITAAC inspections; ICNs; operational programs; initial test programs; and startup activities. The updates will also include the status of hearings, contentions, late
-filed allegations, inspection issues, and licensing activities that could impact the project, as applicable. The Directors of NRO and NRR, Region II Regional Administrator, and VRG co
-chairs will determine the frequency of the updates.
External Stakeholders
External Stakeholders
: 11. Create a message map on key aspects and updates of the ITAAC process for external stakeholders. Update this message map on a quarterly basis.
: 11. Create a message map on key       Develop a message map that includes Completed - 4 Qtr. 2017 aspects and updates of the ITAAC   key aspects of the ITAAC process.
Develop a message map that includes key aspects of the ITAAC process.
process for external stakeholders.                                     A message map was developed which Update this message map on a       Update and publicly release        includes key aspects of the ITAAC quarterly basis.                   NRC-REG-103 to capture that the     process and is available on our public message map will be reviewed and    website. The message map will be updated on a quarterly basis.      updated on a quarterly basis, or as needed to reflect recent changes to the process. The process of updating the process map is captured in the office instruction NRO-REG-103.
Update and publicly release NRC-REG-103 to capture that the message map will be reviewed and updated on a quarterly basis.
                                                          }}
Completed
- 4 Qtr. 2017  A message map was developed which includes key aspects of the ITAAC process and is available on our public website. The message map will be updated on a quarterly basis, or as needed to reflect recent changes to the process. The process of updating the process map is captured in the office instruction NRO
-REG-103.}}

Latest revision as of 15:06, 2 February 2020

Completion of Action Items from the 2017 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria Demonstration Project
ML18352A921
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/17/2019
From: William Jones, Mcginty T
Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs, NRC/RGN-II
To: Frederick Brown, Catherine Haney
Office of New Reactors, NRC/RGN-II
Cozens I, NRO/DCIP
References
Download: ML18352A921 (11)


Text

January 17, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick D. Brown, Director Office of New Reactors Catherine Haney, Regional Administrator Region II FROM: Timothy J. McGinty, Director /RA/

Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs Office of New Reactors William B. Jones, Director /RA/

Division of Construction Oversight Region II

SUBJECT:

COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS FROM THE 2017 INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES, AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA DEMONSTRATION PROJECT On June 1, 2017, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Office of New Reactors (NRO) issued an Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) Closure and Verification Demonstration Final Report (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Numbers ML17135A415). The purpose of this document was to evaluate the readiness and reliability of the ITAAC inspection and verification process, specifically during the last year of construction for the new units under construction. As a part of this effort, the NRC conducted two public meetings. The first was a Category II public meeting on April 24, 2017, described in a memo dated May 18, 2017 ([ADAMS] No. ML17129A262), to demonstrate the agencys capacity to complete ITAAC inspections and notification reviews and validate the agencys agility and decision making processes for handling peak workloads. The second was a Category I public meeting held on December 12, 2017 which was structured to provide the status of staffs action from the 2017 ITAAC demonstration project, and to work through the closeout process of two example ITAAC from consolidation amendments.

Pursuant to the September 29, 2017, memorandum to you (ADAMS Accession No. ML17263A152), an action plan was developed with deliverable milestones to implement the recommendations of the final report. The action plan was included as enclosure 1 of that CONTACT: Ian Cozens, NRO/DCIP/CIPB (301) 415-6203

F. Brown et al. memo. The recommendations from the final report have been implemented as appropriate and are detailed in enclosure 1 of this memo.

Enclosure:

ITAAC Demonstration Project Action Plan Summary

ML18352A921 *via e-mail NRC-001 OFFICE NRO/DCIP NRO/DCIP RII/DCO RII/DCO NAME OAyegbusi TMcGinty NCoovert* WJones DATE 12/19/18 12/21/18 01/17/19 12/21/18

Enclosure:

ITAAC Demonstration Project Action Plan Completion Summary Recommendation Detailed Action Items Completion Details Weekly Public Meetings

1. Utilize weekly public meetings to NRC-REG-103, Inspections, Tests, Completed - 1 Qtr. 2018 facilitate resolution of critical issues Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria associated with Inspections, Tests, [ITAAC] Closure Verification Process, Staff are currently using weekly public Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria will be updated and publicly released to meetings to efficiently discuss and (ITAAC) closure notification (ICN) include process and the purpose of address notification issues. The office and uncompleted ITAAC closure meeting. instruction (OI) NRO-REG-103 notification (UIN) reviews, including Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and items such as the intent of an ITAAC, Acceptance Criteria [ITAAC] Closure ICNs with challenges, methods for Verification Process, has been resolution of issues, and informed updated to include this process. The decision making. OI was made publicly available in 2nd Qtr. 2018.

In addition, establish standing agenda items during the weekly public meeting to discuss expected ICN submittal workloads to allow early notification of resource needs and critical process points.

Increase the frequency of public meetings to accelerate the resolution of emerging ITAAC closure issues as the surge approaches.

Enclosure

Clarity in Existing Industry Guidance

2. Develop an FAQ-type process to Assess existing guidance and determine Completed - 4 Qtr. 2018 provide a forum to document if there is still a need for new process to discussions and resolutions of issues deal with generic issues associated with Recommendation is addressed via the associated with the content of ICNs the content of ITAAC notifications, or if public meeting process facilitated by and UINs, which may be due to gaps issues will be dealt under the public recommendation 1. Discussions in existing guidance or interpretation meeting process in Recommendation 1. regarding the resolution of issues discrepancies. associated with the content of ICNs and Document staff assessment. UINs are held during the routine weekly public meetings.

Complex ITAAC

3. Work with stakeholders to identify Update and publicly release NRC-REG- Completed - 4 Qtr. 2017 complex ITAAC issues by reviewing 103 to capture definition of complex early submittals of uncompleted ITAAC, how complex ITAAC are The Category I public meeting held on ITAAC notifications and develop clear assessed, and how issues will be December 12, 2017, facilitated a expectations for the content of the resolved. discussion of complex ITAAC. The associated ICN submittals. This public meeting summary is available effort will include identifying when (ADAMs Accession No. ML17129A262) complex ITAAC will be completed during the construction schedule. The resolution of many issues related to complex ITAAC were determined to be inspection related, and has not been captured in NRO-REG-103 due to being outside the scope of the office instruction. The term complex ITAAC has been replaced with high schedule risk ITAAC, and associated issues are resolved on an as needed basis.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Processes Guidance Enhancement

4. Revise applicable NRO office Update and publicly release Completed - 1 Qtr. 2018 instructions to ensure lessons NRC-REG-103 to capture:

learned and enhancements for the Revisions to NRO-REG-103 include the ICN process, identified during this 1) lessons learned and enhancements to criteria for technical reviewer demonstration project, are the ITAAC review process that enable assignment, ending the requirement of institutionalized. The revision should staff to resolve ITAAC closure issues completing half of targeted ITAAC before include, but is not limited to, the consistently and efficiently completing verification of non-targeted development of the criteria of when ITAAC within an ITAAC family, and technical reviewer referral is needed 2) the evaluation of the requirement of process improvement points for review of during the reviews of ITAAC completing half of targeted ITAAC before ICNs, UINs, and ITAAC post closure notifications, the evaluation of the completing verification of non-targeted notifications (IPCNs).

requirement of completing half of ITAAC within an ITAAC family targeted ITAAC before completing verification of non-targeted ITAAC 3) criteria for including technical reviewer within an ITAAC family, and the during reviews of ITAAC notifications involvement of technical staff for all ITAAC notifications related to security and emergency-preparedness.

Make the revised NRC office instruction NRO-REG-103 publicly available to give stakeholders insight into the NRCs ITAAC notification review process.

Enhance NRC processes for ITAAC inspection and documentation

5. Enhance NRC processes, including Complete each of the following items for Completed - 2 Qtr. 2018 associated governing documents, NRC processes TARs, URIs, ITAAC communications, and training, to inspection findings, allegations, and Staff developed metrics and other ensure timely identification and IPCNs. process enhancements for inspection resolution of concerns or findings inputs and ICN schedules. The region material to ITAAC, such that ITAAC 1) Pilot process enhancement for two completed a pilot on these items to inspection results support key topics: Inspection Inputs and ICN evaluate methodology and capture activities and milestones in the Inspection Schedule Accountability, lessons learned for other metrics.

ITAAC closure verification process. in order to identify lessons learned and incorporate into the Action Plan From the lessons learned, staff

a. Enhance/develop, as applicable, the for other processes. developed metrics on TAR execution, following processes: technical URIs, ITAAC findings, and IPCNs. No assistance requests (TARs), a. Develop timeliness metrics for additional staff guidance was needed for unresolved items (URIs), ITAAC Inspection Inputs and ICN these processes. For allegations, a inspection findings, allegations and petitions, and IPCNs. For TARS, Inspection Schedule metric was developed along with consider the frequency of performing Accountability. additional guidance.

this process; the timeliness of TAR b. Execute pilot and evaluate processing; and interactions with effectiveness of metrics and A change management plan was licensees for visibility purposes. process enhancements. developed for training needs and internal

c. Finalize metrics from pilot lesson communications. External
b. For inspection findings, consider learned. communications with the public and the enforcement actions and internally d. Incorporate lessons learned into licensee regarding timely identification and externally disputed findings. the development process of and resolution of concerns or findings Consider which NRC process additional timeliness metrics material to ITAAC occurs at a minimum activities, if any, can be done in (Step 2). bi-annually.

parallel with the evaluation of an ITAAC technical concern. 2) Develop process enhancements for the following areas: TARs, URIs, ITAAC inspection findings, allegations and petitions, and IPCNs.

a. Develop timeliness metrics for the above areas.
b. Execute and evaluate effectiveness of metrics and process enhancements.
c. Finalize metrics from lesson learned.
d. Incorporate lessons learned into the development process of additional timeliness metrics, as determined.
3) Determine if additional guidance is needed for each process affecting ITAAC closures. Create working level guidance (i.e. Desktop Guides) for RII and NRO staff. Revision of guidance documents, such as inspection manual chapters (IMCs) and inspection procedures (IPs), will be completed under the regularly scheduled update for each of those documents.
4) Develop and implement change management plan for training needs and communication plan, which includes follow up public meeting, with the licensee and the public.

Performance Dashboards

6. Create an integrated, highly visible, Develop performance dashboards to Completed - 4 Qtr. 2017 internal, color-coded performance track the status and timeliness of ICN dashboard to track the status of each reviews and ITAAC inspections based on Dashboards were developed to provide step for ICN reviews and inspection program metrics. the ongoing status of ICNs currently process for early identification of under review to NRC management and ITAAC closure related issues for Develop performance dashboards for for public information. The dashboards management attention and inspections that affect ITAAC closures to provide the status of each ICN and UIN resolution. highlight issues based on program under review, the number received and metrics. closed per month, and the length of time Specific process steps to measure in review per month.

should include:

  • The status of each step for ICN Dashboards related to inspections have reviews. also been developed. These
  • Key aspects of the inspection dashboards track the inspection process, including the timeliness completion status versus those ICNs of report issuance, inspection which have been submitted, and the initiators, and inspection ITAAC inspection plan completion rate.

outcomes.

  • Potential inspection scheduling or The ICN and UIN review dashboards resource issues. have been developed and are currently being shared through the NRCs public website.

Inspection Scheduling Efficiency

7. Determine the most efficient location Incorporate scheduling process lessons Completed - 2 Qtr. 2018 and time for inspections. Continue to learned into Desktop Guide(s) including focus on short-duration construction decision making on how to schedule Scheduling process lessons learned activities, such as installing the different types of inspections. have been incorporated into a desktop reactor vessel, which are unlikely to guide. These lessons learned include be repeated for additional inspection Produce a schedule of pre-op test decision making on how to schedule opportunities. procedure reviews and tests to verify different types of inspections.

inspections are scheduled ahead of Additionally a schedule of pre-Additionally, verify that test procedure tests. operational test procedure reviews and inspections are scheduled when process to verify inspections are procedures are issued and available scheduled ahead of tests has been versus when the tests are being produced.

performed.

Timeliness of Inspection Reports

8. Establish timeliness requirements for Review existing process(s) for inspection Completed - 3 Qtr. 2018 inspection disposition including report timeliness requirements, including inspection completion in CIPIMS and dispositioning inspection findings for IMC 0613 was updated during its inspection report issuance to support potential efficiencies. regularly scheduled revision. In addition, the ITAAC surge and the Title 10 of IMC 0613 captures the issuance of the Code of Federal Regulations Create or revise working level guidance reports independent of the quarterly (10 CFR) 52.103(g) finding. (i.e. Desktop Guides) for RII and NRO inspection report to document ITAAC staff to capture efficiencies for inspection inspections as the scheduled fuel load report timeliness. Revision of guidance approaches. Final inspection reports do documents, such as IMCs and IPs, will not need to be issued for the 52.103(g) be completed under the regularly finding to be made by staff, however the scheduled update for each of those NRC does require that all inspections are documents. complete and no findings were issued.

Maintain Qualified Staff

9. To ensure continued ICN review and Update and publicly release Completed - 1 Qtr. 2018 inspection capacity, cross-train NRC-REG-103 to capture the additional staff to support ICN cross-training procedure, including The office instruction NRO-REG-103 has workflow capacities and ITAAC developing a metric to track amount of been updated to capture the inspections. staff cross-trained and number of ICN cross-training procedure in Appendix A5.

reviewed in a given year to maintain Construction inspector qualification has For inspector qualification, the NRC will proficiency in ICN reviews. been incorporated into IMC 1245 incorporate construction inspector Construction inspector qualification will Appendix C-15 which cross-qualifies new training into IMC-1245. be incorporated into IMC 1245 construction inspectors for plants being Appendix C-15 constructed under 10 CFR Part 52.

Organizational Structures

10. Establish a temporary organizational Develop and capture in a memorandum Completed - 1 Qtr. 2018 structure with senior executive the criteria for establishing a temporary leadership approximately 12 months organization to oversee the ITAAC This was developed as part of the Vogtle before projected fuel load. This closure verification process. Readiness Group (VRG) Charter organization would oversee and (ML18059A273). The VRGs primary coordinate the ITAAC closure objective is to identify and resolve any verification process to ensure licensing, inspection, or regulatory appropriate decision making and the challenges or gaps that could impact the prompt identification and resolution of schedule for completion of Vogtle Units 3 issues. and 4. To accomplish this objective, the VRG will provide high-level assessments, coordination, oversight, and management direction of NRC activities associated with the licensing, inspection, testing, and operation of Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Each of the NRC offices/region and associated staff retains responsibility for the activities related to licensing, inspection, and assessment of Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under their purview.

The VRG will provide periodic status updates to the Directors of NRO and NRR and the Regional Administrator, Region II. These periodic updates will include information on topics such as license reviews; ITAAC inspections; ICNs; operational programs; initial test programs; and startup activities. The updates will also include the status of hearings, contentions, late-filed allegations, inspection issues, and licensing activities that could impact the project, as applicable. The Directors of NRO and NRR, Region II Regional Administrator, and VRG co-chairs will determine the frequency of the updates.

External Stakeholders

11. Create a message map on key Develop a message map that includes Completed - 4 Qtr. 2017 aspects and updates of the ITAAC key aspects of the ITAAC process.

process for external stakeholders. A message map was developed which Update this message map on a Update and publicly release includes key aspects of the ITAAC quarterly basis. NRC-REG-103 to capture that the process and is available on our public message map will be reviewed and website. The message map will be updated on a quarterly basis. updated on a quarterly basis, or as needed to reflect recent changes to the process. The process of updating the process map is captured in the office instruction NRO-REG-103.