ML19023A293: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML19023A293 | | number = ML19023A293 | ||
| issue date = 01/22/2019 | | issue date = 01/22/2019 | ||
| title = | | title = Conversation Record with DOE Idaho Op. Office Discuss Draft Request for Clarification of Responses to the Technical RAI on Three Mile Island, Unit 2 (TMI-2) ISFSI Renewal Application, Conv. Held on 01/22/19 (Dkt. 72-20, SNM-2508) | ||
| author name = Banovac K | | author name = Banovac K | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/DSFM/RMB | | author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/DSFM/RMB | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 699 .*"'''"'"<.,,_ | {{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 699 .*"''' "'"<.,,_ U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE (03-201 3) f~~ | ||
;~J "'* | ;~J 01 /22/2019 | ||
CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU | "'* ...... " CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office 01 /22/2019 E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING | ||
[Z) OUTGOING ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER(S) | |||
Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office 72-20 LICENSE NUMBER(S) CONTROL NUMBER(S) | |||
SNM-2508 00 I 028/L-20l7-RNW-0019 and 000993/L-20 l 7-LNE-0007 SUBJECT Discuss draft request for clarification of responses to the technical request for additional information (RAJ) on Three Mile lsland, Unit 2 (TMl-2) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) renewal application | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office (DOE-JD) attendees: Steven Wahnschaffe , Scott Ferrara, Steve Ahrendts , Brian Gutherman , Jeffery Long , Chris Backus , Sarah Gibboney NRC attendees: Kristina Banovac , Ricardo Torres, Mike Call , Caylee Kenny A teleconference was held between NRC and DOE-ID representatives to discuss the draft request for clarification of the technical RAJ responses (follow-up RAls) on the TMI-2 JSFSJ renewal application , which was provided to DOE-ID on January 16 , 2019. The purpose of the call was to: (I) ensure a common understanding of the follow-up RA Is; (2) ensure that the follow-up RA Is are not already addressed in the current submittal; (3) ensure the follow-up RA!s do not include proprietary information; and (4) identify an appropriate response date for DOE-ID to respond to the follow-up RA!s. DOE-ID noted that it did not have any questions on the draft follow-up RAJs. DOE-ID noted that it will need until January 25 , 2019 to determine a response date and if there is any proprietary information in the draft follow-up RA!s. Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY) DOE-ID will provide the response date to the NRC by January 25 , 2019. DOE-ID will determine if there is any proprietary information in the draft follow-up RAls by January 25 , 2019. NRC will issue the request for clarification letter to DOE-ID after receiving the response date from DOE-ID. Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Kristina Banovac SIGNATURE NRC FORM 699 (03-2013) | |||
Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office (DOE-JD) attendees : Steven Wahnschaffe, Scott Ferrara, Steve Ahrendts, Brian Gutherman , Jeffery Long, Chris Backus, Sarah Gibboney NRC attendees : Kristina Banovac, Ricardo Torres, Mike Call , Caylee Kenny A teleconference was held between NRC and DOE-ID representatives to discuss the draft request for clarification of the technical RAJ responses (follow-up RAls) on the TMI-2 JSFSJ renewal application, which was provided to DOE-ID on January 16, 2019. | |||
The purpose of the call was to : (I) ensure a common understanding of the follow-up RA Is; (2) ensure that the follow-up RA Is are not already addressed in the current submittal; (3) ensure the follow-up RA!s do not include proprietary information; and (4) identify an appropriate response date for DOE-ID to respond to the follow-up RA!s. | |||
DOE-ID noted that it did not have any questions on the draft follow-up RAJs. DOE-ID noted that it will need until January 25 , 2019 to determine a response date and if there is any proprietary information in the draft follow-up RA!s . | |||
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY) | |||
DOE-ID will provide the response date to the NRC by January 25 , 2019. | |||
DOE-ID will determine if there is any proprietary information in the draft follow-up RAls by January 25 , 2019. | |||
NRC will issue the request for clarification letter to DOE-ID after receiving the response date from DOE-ID. | |||
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Kristina Banovac SIGNATURE | |||
/ --.. | |||
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013) | |||
Page 1 of 2 | |||
NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2013) | |||
CONVERSATION RECORD (continued) | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
: (Continued from page 1 | : (Continued from page 1) | ||
DOE-ID also noted that it may submit a final revised version of the license renewal application (LRA, Rev. 2) with its response to the follow-up RAis. The NRC staff noted that it only needed the final version of the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) supplement (provided in Appendix C of the LRA), including any referenced tables , as revised through DOE-ID's response to the initial RA Is and follow-up RAls. DOE-ID noted that it will consider what is clearer for its recordkeeping in determining whether to submit a complete revised LRA wit_h the follow-up RAJ response. NRC FORM 699 (03-2013) | DOE-ID also noted that it may submit a final revised version of the license renewal application (LRA, Rev. 2) with its response to the follow-up RAis. The NRC staff noted that it only needed the final version of the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) supplement (provided in Appendix C of the LRA), including any referenced tables, as revised through DOE-ID 's response to the initial RA Is and follow-up RAls. DOE-ID noted that it will consider what is clearer for its recordkeeping in determining whether to submit a complete revised LRA wit_h the follow-up RAJ response. | ||
Page 2 of 2}} | NRC FORM 699 (03-2013) | ||
Page 2 of 2}} | |||
Latest revision as of 14:08, 2 February 2020
| ML19023A293 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07200020 |
| Issue date: | 01/22/2019 |
| From: | Kristina Banovac Renewals and Materials Branch |
| To: | US Dept of Energy, Idaho Operations Office |
| References | |
| CAC 000993, CAC 001028, EPID L-2017-LNE-0007, EPID L-2017-RNW-0019 | |
| Download: ML19023A293 (2) | |
Text
NRC FORM 699 .*" "'"<.,,_ U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE (03-201 3) f~~
- ~J 01 /22/2019
"'* ...... " CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office 01 /22/2019 E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING
[Z) OUTGOING ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER(S)
Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office 72-20 LICENSE NUMBER(S) CONTROL NUMBER(S)
SNM-2508 00 I 028/L-20l7-RNW-0019 and 000993/L-20 l 7-LNE-0007 SUBJECT Discuss draft request for clarification of responses to the technical request for additional information (RAJ) on Three Mile lsland, Unit 2 (TMl-2) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) renewal application
SUMMARY
Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office (DOE-JD) attendees : Steven Wahnschaffe, Scott Ferrara, Steve Ahrendts, Brian Gutherman , Jeffery Long, Chris Backus, Sarah Gibboney NRC attendees : Kristina Banovac, Ricardo Torres, Mike Call , Caylee Kenny A teleconference was held between NRC and DOE-ID representatives to discuss the draft request for clarification of the technical RAJ responses (follow-up RAls) on the TMI-2 JSFSJ renewal application, which was provided to DOE-ID on January 16, 2019.
The purpose of the call was to : (I) ensure a common understanding of the follow-up RA Is; (2) ensure that the follow-up RA Is are not already addressed in the current submittal; (3) ensure the follow-up RA!s do not include proprietary information; and (4) identify an appropriate response date for DOE-ID to respond to the follow-up RA!s.
DOE-ID noted that it did not have any questions on the draft follow-up RAJs. DOE-ID noted that it will need until January 25 , 2019 to determine a response date and if there is any proprietary information in the draft follow-up RA!s .
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)
DOE-ID will provide the response date to the NRC by January 25 , 2019.
DOE-ID will determine if there is any proprietary information in the draft follow-up RAls by January 25 , 2019.
NRC will issue the request for clarification letter to DOE-ID after receiving the response date from DOE-ID.
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Kristina Banovac SIGNATURE
/ --..
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 1 of 2
NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2013)
CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)
SUMMARY
- (Continued from page 1)
DOE-ID also noted that it may submit a final revised version of the license renewal application (LRA, Rev. 2) with its response to the follow-up RAis. The NRC staff noted that it only needed the final version of the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) supplement (provided in Appendix C of the LRA), including any referenced tables, as revised through DOE-ID 's response to the initial RA Is and follow-up RAls. DOE-ID noted that it will consider what is clearer for its recordkeeping in determining whether to submit a complete revised LRA wit_h the follow-up RAJ response.
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 2 of 2