ML061770446: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 NRC ;iRM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE (9-2003)06/15/2006 CONVERSATION RECORD TIME 2:30pm NAME OF PERSON(S) | {{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 NRC ;iRM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE (9-2003) 06/15/2006 CONVERSATION RECORD TIME 2:30pm NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR INCONTACT WITH YOU TELEPHONE NO. TYPE OF CONVERSATION Thomas Matthews l VISIT ORGANIZATION FICONFERENCE Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) | ||
CONTACTED OR | SUBJECT 96 TELEPHONE Discussion of Issues Associated with 6/9/06 OPPD Exemption Request Related to Fort Calhoun's INCOMING Use a Light Weight Transfer Cask for an Upcoming Dry Fuel Storage Campaign E]OUTGOING | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
( | (Continueon Page 2) | ||
Bernie Van Sant, Tom Matthews, and Steve Gebers.NRC Attendees: | Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) Attendees: Bernie Van Sant, Tom Matthews, and Steve Gebers. | ||
Shana Helton, Elizabeth Thompson, and Joe Sebrosky Transnuclear Inc., (TN) Attendees: | NRC Attendees: Shana Helton, Elizabeth Thompson, and Joe Sebrosky Transnuclear Inc., (TN) Attendees: Jim Axline, Robert Grubb, Jayant Bondre, UB Chopra, Prakesh Narayanan The purpose of the phone call was to resolve question that the staff had regarding OPPD's exemption request dated 6/9/06 (see ADAMS ML061650157 for the exemption request). | ||
Jim Axline, Robert Grubb, Jayant Bondre, UB Chopra, Prakesh Narayanan The purpose of the phone call was to resolve question that the staff had regarding OPPD's exemption request dated 6/9/06 (see ADAMS ML061650157 for the exemption request).In a 6/14/06 phone call the staff committed to'revising a question it had regarding the exemption request. The revised question and OPPD's answer appears below.1) Are the radiological consequences (for both the average on-site worker and the off-site individual) of the "hung load due to crane malfunction" discussed on page 14 of the exemption request bounded by any of the prior accident or off-normal condition analyses discussed in Section M.11 or Section W.11 of the UFSAR?OPPD answer: Yes, the dose rates for the hung load due to a crane malfunction are bounded by the dose rate for the loss of the neutron shield contained in section W.11.1.4 of the UFSAR. (The updated UFSAR Appendix W is provided in | In a 6/14/06 phone call the staff committed to'revising a question it had regarding the exemption request. The revised question and OPPD's answer appears below. | ||
The loss of neutron shield analysis contained in W.11.1.4 of the UFSAR postulates a complete loss of the neutron shield and also assumes that the trailer shielding is lost. The dose rates provided in W.11.1.4 of the UFSAR therefore bound the "hung load due to a crane malfunction" scenario.Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED None -for OPPD NRC to determine if question need to be documented in a request for additional information I Joe Sebroskv ACTION TAKEN | : 1) Are the radiological consequences (for both the average on-site worker and the off-site individual) of the "hung load due to crane malfunction" discussed on page 14 of the exemption request bounded by any of the prior accident or off-normal condition analyses discussed in Section M.11 or Section W.11 of the UFSAR? | ||
-if a request for additional infor fyrn is needed it will be ed in a separate correspondence. | OPPD answer: Yes, the dose rates for the hung load due to a crane malfunction are bounded by the dose rate for the loss of the neutron shield contained in section W.11.1.4 of the UFSAR. (The updated UFSAR Appendix W is provided in of OPPD's exemption request). The loss of neutron shield analysis contained in W.11.1.4 of the UFSAR postulates a complete loss of the neutron shield and also assumes that the trailer shielding is lost. The dose rates provided in W.11.1.4 of the UFSAR therefore bound the "hung load due to a crane malfunction" scenario. | ||
TITLE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION I SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION DATE NRC FORM 699 (9-2003)PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER}} | Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED None - for OPPD NRC to determine if question need to be documented in a request for additional information I | ||
Joe Sebroskv ACTION TAKEN isV ned Not applicable - if a request for additional infor fyrn is needed it will be ed in a separate correspondence. | |||
TITLE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION I SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION DATE NRC FORM 699 (9-2003) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER}} |
Latest revision as of 18:03, 23 November 2019
ML061770446 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Fort Calhoun ![]() |
Issue date: | 06/15/2006 |
From: | Joseph Sebrosky NRC/NMSS/SFPO |
To: | Matthews T Omaha Public Power District |
References | |
Download: ML061770446 (1) | |
Text
Page 1 NRC ;iRM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE (9-2003) 06/15/2006 CONVERSATION RECORD TIME 2:30pm NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR INCONTACT WITH YOU TELEPHONE NO. TYPE OF CONVERSATION Thomas Matthews l VISIT ORGANIZATION FICONFERENCE Omaha Public Power District (OPPD)
SUBJECT 96 TELEPHONE Discussion of Issues Associated with 6/9/06 OPPD Exemption Request Related to Fort Calhoun's INCOMING Use a Light Weight Transfer Cask for an Upcoming Dry Fuel Storage Campaign E]OUTGOING
SUMMARY
(Continueon Page 2)
Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) Attendees: Bernie Van Sant, Tom Matthews, and Steve Gebers.
NRC Attendees: Shana Helton, Elizabeth Thompson, and Joe Sebrosky Transnuclear Inc., (TN) Attendees: Jim Axline, Robert Grubb, Jayant Bondre, UB Chopra, Prakesh Narayanan The purpose of the phone call was to resolve question that the staff had regarding OPPD's exemption request dated 6/9/06 (see ADAMS ML061650157 for the exemption request).
In a 6/14/06 phone call the staff committed to'revising a question it had regarding the exemption request. The revised question and OPPD's answer appears below.
- 1) Are the radiological consequences (for both the average on-site worker and the off-site individual) of the "hung load due to crane malfunction" discussed on page 14 of the exemption request bounded by any of the prior accident or off-normal condition analyses discussed in Section M.11 or Section W.11 of the UFSAR?
OPPD answer: Yes, the dose rates for the hung load due to a crane malfunction are bounded by the dose rate for the loss of the neutron shield contained in section W.11.1.4 of the UFSAR. (The updated UFSAR Appendix W is provided in of OPPD's exemption request). The loss of neutron shield analysis contained in W.11.1.4 of the UFSAR postulates a complete loss of the neutron shield and also assumes that the trailer shielding is lost. The dose rates provided in W.11.1.4 of the UFSAR therefore bound the "hung load due to a crane malfunction" scenario.
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED None - for OPPD NRC to determine if question need to be documented in a request for additional information I
Joe Sebroskv ACTION TAKEN isV ned Not applicable - if a request for additional infor fyrn is needed it will be ed in a separate correspondence.
TITLE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION I SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION DATE NRC FORM 699 (9-2003) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER