|
|---|
Category:Note to File incl Telcon Record
MONTHYEARML23046A1412023-02-10010 February 2023
Concrete Testing Clarification Conversation Record
ML23074A3422023-02-0808 February 2023
Shielding Clarification Call Conversation Record
ML19192A0892019-07-10010 July 2019
Conv. Record with D. Shaw, Et Al./Tn 10:00AM Conference Call with Tn - Discuss a Proposed Request for Supplemental Information for the Graded Approach Pilot, Fuel Qualification Tables, Model No. Nuhoms, A16 (Conv. Held on 7/10/19)
ML19186A3342019-07-0303 July 2019
Conversation Record with D. Shaw/Tn Americas LLC Conference Call with Tn - Discuss a Proposed Request for Supplemental Information for the Graded Approach Pilot, Fuel Qualification Tables, Model No. Nuhoms (Conv. Held on 6/27/2019)
ML19151A7582019-05-30030 May 2019
Conversation Record with D. Shaw, Et al./Orano-TN Conference Call with Orano-TN - Discuss a Proposed Request for Supplemental Information for the Graded Approach Pilot, Model No. Nuhmos, Amend. 16 (Dkt. 72-1004) Conv. Held on 05/22/2019
ML18071A0592018-03-12012 March 2018
Conversation Record with Tn Americas LLC Clarification Call on RAI No. 1 Response for Certificate of Compliance 1004 Amendment 15 Application, Conversation Held on March 8, 2018
ML18003A0462017-12-22022 December 2017
Conv. with Tn Telecom Was Held with Tn Americas LLC to Discuss the Inspection Conducted July 19, 2017 in Which the Staff Identified an Apparent Violation Related to 10 CFR 72.146. Staff Conducted a Re-exit (Dkt No. 07201004), on 12/22/17
ML0907607662009-03-12012 March 2009
Conversation Record with Holtec, Tn, NAC, Energy Solutions, NEI New Regulatory Requirements for SGI Access, Held on 3/12/2009
ML0617704492006-06-26026 June 2006
6/23/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Questions Associated with an Exemption Request
ML0617704422006-06-26026 June 2006
6/14/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Questions Associated with an Exemption Request
ML0617704462006-06-15015 June 2006
6/15/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Questions Associated with an Exemption Request
ML0616300202006-06-0909 June 2006
Phone Call Summary Regarding Impending Fort Calhoun Exemption Request
ML0616001272006-05-30030 May 2006
5/30/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Impending Exemption for Fort Calhoun to Us a Light Weight Transfer Cask
ML0616001252006-05-25025 May 2006
5/25/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Impending Exemption for Fort Calhoun to Use a Light Weight Transfer Cask
2023-02-08
[Table view]
Category:Verbal Comm
MONTHYEARML23046A1412023-02-10010 February 2023
Concrete Testing Clarification Conversation Record
ML23074A3422023-02-0808 February 2023
Shielding Clarification Call Conversation Record
ML19192A0892019-07-10010 July 2019
Conv. Record with D. Shaw, Et Al./Tn 10:00AM Conference Call with Tn - Discuss a Proposed Request for Supplemental Information for the Graded Approach Pilot, Fuel Qualification Tables, Model No. Nuhoms, A16 (Conv. Held on 7/10/19)
ML19186A3342019-07-0303 July 2019
Conversation Record with D. Shaw/Tn Americas LLC Conference Call with Tn - Discuss a Proposed Request for Supplemental Information for the Graded Approach Pilot, Fuel Qualification Tables, Model No. Nuhoms (Conv. Held on 6/27/2019)
ML19151A7582019-05-30030 May 2019
Conversation Record with D. Shaw, Et al./Orano-TN Conference Call with Orano-TN - Discuss a Proposed Request for Supplemental Information for the Graded Approach Pilot, Model No. Nuhmos, Amend. 16 (Dkt. 72-1004) Conv. Held on 05/22/2019
ML18071A0592018-03-12012 March 2018
Conversation Record with Tn Americas LLC Clarification Call on RAI No. 1 Response for Certificate of Compliance 1004 Amendment 15 Application, Conversation Held on March 8, 2018
ML18003A0462017-12-22022 December 2017
Conv. with Tn Telecom Was Held with Tn Americas LLC to Discuss the Inspection Conducted July 19, 2017 in Which the Staff Identified an Apparent Violation Related to 10 CFR 72.146. Staff Conducted a Re-exit (Dkt No. 07201004), on 12/22/17
ML0907607662009-03-12012 March 2009
Conversation Record with Holtec, Tn, NAC, Energy Solutions, NEI New Regulatory Requirements for SGI Access, Held on 3/12/2009
ML0617704492006-06-26026 June 2006
6/23/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Questions Associated with an Exemption Request
ML0617704422006-06-26026 June 2006
6/14/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Questions Associated with an Exemption Request
ML0617704462006-06-15015 June 2006
6/15/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Questions Associated with an Exemption Request
ML0616300202006-06-0909 June 2006
Phone Call Summary Regarding Impending Fort Calhoun Exemption Request
ML0616001272006-05-30030 May 2006
5/30/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Impending Exemption for Fort Calhoun to Us a Light Weight Transfer Cask
ML0616001252006-05-25025 May 2006
5/25/06 Phone Call Summary with Omaha Public Power District to Discuss Impending Exemption for Fort Calhoun to Use a Light Weight Transfer Cask
2023-02-08
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE (9-2003) 05/25/2006 CONVERSATION RECORD TIME 3:30pm NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU TELEPHONE NO. TYPE OF CONVERSATION Thomas Matthews -VISIT ORGANIZATION CONFERENCE Omaha Public Power District TELEPHONE SUBJECT Discussion of Impending Exemption for Fort Calhoun to Use a Light Weight Transfer Cask for an INCOMING Upcoming Dry Fuel Storage Campaign D OUTGOING
SUMMARY
(Continue on Page 2)
Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) Attendees: Bernie Van Sant, Joe McManis, Tom Matthews, Steve Andersen, and Rich Jaworski NRC Attendees: William Ruland, Wayne Hodges, Ed Hackett, Larry Campbell, Jorge Solis, Scott Atwater (RIV) and Joe Sebrosky Transnuclear Inc., (TN) Attendees: Tara Neider, Jim Axline, Robert Grubb, and Jayant Bondre The purpose of the call was to provide feedback to OPPD and TN regarding NRC's review of TN's supplemental calculations to resolve an issue related to the thermal methodology for the transfer cask inside the transfer trailer temporary shielding and 2) to discuss options for resolving the issue. The call was a followup to discussions that the NRC staff had with OPPD in a public meeting on 5/24/06. (The 5/24/06 meeting summary is publicly available in ADAMS under ML061560554).
During the public meeting on 5/24/06 OPPD indicated that TN had performed additional calculations to resolve this issue and to defend TN's position that there is not a change in method of evaluation related to the thermal methodology for the transfer cask inside the transfer trailer. As part of its ongoing inspection effort, NRC reviewed these calculations and informed Fort Calhoun and TN that they do not resolve the issue. The NRC staff indicated that there still appears to be a change in method of evaluation related to thermal methodology for the transfer cask inside the transfer trailer. The NRC staff stated that it believed Fort Calhoun had two options for resolving the issue which were:
- 1) The Fort Calhoun draft exemption that was discussed in the 5/24/06 public meeting would remain silent regarding a change in method of evaluation. Fort Calhoun would continue to try to resolve the issue through the inspection process
- 2) Fort Calhoun could include in its exemption request a change in a method of evaluation related to 72.48(c)(2)(viii). The exemption request could include simplified calclulations to resolve the issue.
Continue on Page2 ACTION REQUIRED None NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION SIGNATURE DATE Joe Sebroskv ACTION TAKEN TITLE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION DATE NRC FORM 699 (9-2003) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Page 2 CONVERSATION RECORD (Continued)
SUMMARY
(Continue on Page 3)
OPPD indicated it would consider the options and let the NRC know which option it would choose.
In a subsequent phone call on 5/26/06 Tom Matthews of OPPD informed Joe Sebrosky of the NRC that OPPD intended to follow Option 2 discussed above.
Continue on Page 3
