ML091050374: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML091050374 | |||
| issue date = 04/01/2009 | |||
| title = Draft NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2009-02, Rev. 1, Use of Containment Atmosphere Gaseous Radioactivity Monitors as Reactor Coolant System Leakage Detection Equipment at Nuclear Power Reactors | |||
| author name = Mcginty T | |||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DPR | |||
| addressee name = | |||
| addressee affiliation = | |||
| docket = | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = Matthew Hamm | |||
| document report number = RIS-09-002, Rev 1 | |||
| document type = NRC Regulatory Issue Summary, Draft | |||
| page count = 5 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[followed by::RIS 2009-02]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | |||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION | |||
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 | |||
April XX, 2009 | |||
NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2009-02, REV. 1, | |||
USE OF CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE GASEOUS RADIOACTIVITY | |||
MONITORS AS REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM LEAKAGE DETECTION | |||
EQUIPMENT AT NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS | |||
ADDRESSEES | |||
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have permanently | |||
ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor | |||
vessel. | |||
All current and potential applicants for a combined license, manufacturing license, standard | |||
design certification, or standard design approval for a nuclear power plant under the provisions | |||
of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 52 (10 CFR), Licenses, Certifications, and | |||
Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants. | |||
All applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits and operating licenses under the | |||
provisions of 10 CFR Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities. | |||
INTENT | |||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this revised regulatory issue | |||
summary (RIS) to clarify expectations regarding licensee operability determinations and | |||
communicate the NRC plan to address the situation created when some containment | |||
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors are unable to meet technical specification (TS) | |||
requirements. The plan consists of integrating a streamlined license amendment process with | |||
the use of enforcement discretion, where appropriate. This RIS requires no action or written | |||
response on the part of an addressee. RIS 2009-02 was originally issued on January 29, 2009. | |||
BACKGROUND INFORMATION | |||
In order to meet General Design Criterion 30, "Quality of reactor coolant pressure boundary," of | |||
Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, licensees typically include RCS leakage detection equipment in | |||
their plant designs because the equipment can be used to detect reactor coolant pressure | |||
boundary (RCPB) leakage. A typical RCS leakage detection system consists of a combination | |||
of the following: | |||
* a containment atmosphere particulate radioactivity monitoring system | |||
* a containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring system | |||
ML091050374 | |||
RIS 2009-02, Rev. 1 | |||
Page 2 of 5 | |||
* containment sump-level and sump-pump instrumentation | |||
* containment cooler condensate monitoring instrumentation | |||
Containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems measure RCS leakage | |||
indirectly by detecting airborne radioactivity released from RCS leakage. Response time is the | |||
length of time required for these monitoring systems to detect a given volume of RCS leakage. | |||
Response time is dependant on RCS radioactivity concentration, as well as other variables. For | |||
a given volume of leakage, with all other variables held constant, a higher RCS radioactivity | |||
concentration will yield a shorter response time for these monitoring systems. The design | |||
analyses for the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used in the | |||
licensing bases for most plants typically assume a RCS radioactivity concentration | |||
approximately equivalent to 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core. Improvements in fuel cladding | |||
integrity and RCS chemistry controls have significantly reduced RCS radioactivity concentration | |||
at most plants. As a result, the monitors for operating units may have longer response times | |||
than they would with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core because the actual RCS radioactivity | |||
concentration is less than it would be with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core. | |||
Most plants have TS Limiting Conditions for Operation requirements for containment | |||
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used as part of RCS leakage detection | |||
equipment. The TS requirements for the monitoring systems response times are based on the | |||
design analysis that is part of a plants licensing basis. Whether the monitors are operable | |||
depends on the licensing basis and TS requirements. When the monitors are inoperable the | |||
licensee is required to take remedial actions as permitted by their TS or to shut down the | |||
reactor. | |||
Information Notice (IN) 2005-24, Nonconservatism in Leakage Detection Sensitivity | |||
(ADAMS Accession No. ML051780073), communicated the issue created by differences | |||
between actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations to all licensees. The purpose of | |||
IN 2005-24 was to have licensees review information related to problems with containment | |||
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as part of RCS leakage detection equipment | |||
and consider appropriate actions as applicable to their plants. Information Notices do not | |||
require any action by licensees. | |||
In September 2008, NRC inspectors at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant identified a non-cited | |||
violation for not complying with TS requirements for RCS leakage detection equipment. In | |||
November 2008, the licensee for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant and the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant | |||
requested exigent license amendments from the NRC after taking remedial actions as permitted | |||
by their TS because of a concern that the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity | |||
monitor channels of the RCS leakage detection system were inoperable. | |||
To address the issue, licensees working through the industry-sponsored Technical | |||
Specifications Task Force (TSTF) have attempted to create generic TS changes, model License | |||
Amendment Requests (LARs), model safety evaluations, and model proposed | |||
no-significant-hazards consideration determinations using the NRC TS Consolidated Line Item | |||
Improvement Process (CLIIP). See RIS 2000-10, Consolidated Line Item Improvement | |||
Process For Adopting Standard Technical Specifications Changes for Power Reactors | |||
(ADAMS Accession No. ML003693442) for more information on the NRC CLIIP. | |||
RIS 2009-02, Rev. 1 | |||
Page 3 of 5 | |||
RIS 2009-02 was originally issued on January 29, 2009. NRC received several responses and | |||
inquiries regarding NRCs expectations with respect to operability determinations for the | |||
containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors. Some responders incorrectly | |||
interpreted the original RIS to mean that NRC was declaring their site specific containment | |||
atmosphere gaseous radiation monitors to be inoperable. The NRC does not make generic | |||
operability determinations. As stated in NRC Inspection Manual Part 9900: Technical | |||
Guidance, Operability Determinations And Functionality Assessments For Resolution Of | |||
Degraded Or Nonconforming Conditions Adverse To Quality Or Safety (ADAMS Accession No. | |||
ML081360529), licensees determine operability of equipment based on their plant-specific | |||
licensing basis. | |||
SUMMARY OF ISSUE | |||
Improvements in fuel cladding integrity and RCS chemistry controls result in lower RCS | |||
radioactivity concentrations during operational activities, including situations where there is RCS | |||
leakage. Thus, containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems which are | |||
designed on the basis of higher assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations may not provide | |||
accurate indication of RCS leakage in the required length of time due to the longer response | |||
time of the monitoring system. If this occurs each licensee must determine the operability their | |||
gaseous radioactivity monitoring system based on their plant-specific licensing basis. | |||
The NRC considers the longer response times of the containment atmosphere gaseous | |||
radioactivity monitors to be of very low safety significance. The monitors would still be able to | |||
detect degradation in the RCPB long before components fail in a manner that would affect plant | |||
safety. Additionally, plants also have multiple diverse and redundant methods available to | |||
detect RCS leakage and to provide licensees with a means to detect significant RCPB | |||
degradation and to take appropriate action to ensure the continued protection of public health | |||
and safety. Finally, nuclear power plants are designed to provide adequate core cooling | |||
following postulated loss-of-coolant accidents up to and including a break equivalent in size to | |||
the double-ended rupture of the largest pipe in the RCS. This design feature, coupled with the | |||
extremely low likelihood of unstable crack growth resulting in a loss-of-coolant accident, leads | |||
the NRC to conclude that the risk significance of this issue is very low. | |||
The NRC plans to address the issue of inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous | |||
radioactivity monitoring systems in an integrated fashion by: (i) working with the TSTF to | |||
develop revised generic TS for the monitoring system, and facilitating licensee implementation | |||
of the revised generic TS through a streamlined license amendment process; and (ii) using | |||
guidance on NRCs exercise of enforcement discretion involving inoperable containment | |||
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems issued in EGM-09-001 | |||
(ADAMS Accession No. ML090300467). | |||
The NRC will review the generic TS changes that the TSTF proposes for pressurized-water | |||
reactors (PWRs) and boiling-water reactors (BWRs). If the generic TS changes are found to be | |||
acceptable, the NRC will make the generic model LARs, model safety evaluations, and model | |||
no-significant-hazards consideration determinations available to licensees using the NRC CLIIP. | |||
The revised TS would clarify the licensing basis for the leakage detection system in order to | |||
prevent further confusion in the future. Licensees are free to submit LARs for TS changes to | |||
address the issue. If licensees make a determination that their containment atmosphere | |||
RIS 2009-02, Rev. 1 | |||
Page 4 of 5 | |||
gaseous radioactivity monitors are operable after examining their plant-specific licensing basis, | |||
they can choose to take no action. | |||
On February 18, 2009, the TSTF submitted TSTF-513, Revision 1 Revise PWR Operability | |||
Requirements and Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation and TSTF-514, Revision 0 | |||
Revise BWR Operability Requirements and Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation to the | |||
NRC for review. Licensees are free to submit LARs to address the issue using TSTF-513 or | |||
TSTF-514; or they can propose alternative solutions. | |||
In certain circumstances involving inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity | |||
monitoring systems, enforcement discretion is available. Specific guidance for this enforcement | |||
discretion is described in EGM-09-001 (ADAMS Accession No. ML090300467) and is available | |||
on the NRCs web site at www.nrc.gov. | |||
BACKFIT DISCUSSION | |||
The intent of this revised RIS is to inform addressees of the NRCs plan to address the failure of | |||
containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as RCS leakage detection | |||
equipment to meet TS requirements and clarify expectations regarding licensee operability | |||
determinations. | |||
The staff is not imposing any new positions on licensees. This revised RIS is not providing any | |||
new regulatory positions. This revised RIS only conveys the NRCs plan to address the issue of | |||
RCS leakage detection equipment failing to meet TS requirements because of the difference | |||
between actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations. This revised RIS requires no | |||
action or written response and, therefore, is not a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109, Backfitting. | |||
Consequently, the staff did not perform a backfit analysis. | |||
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION | |||
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register | |||
because it is informational and pertains to a staff position that does not represent a departure | |||
from current regulatory requirements and practice. However, a public meeting to discuss this | |||
RIS was held on April 14, 2009. The meeting summary is available under ADAMS Accession | |||
No. ML09XXXXX. The NRC intends to work with industry representatives, members of the | |||
public, and other stakeholders in developing final guidance and in modifying related guidance | |||
documents. | |||
CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT | |||
This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808) | |||
and, therefore, is not subject to the Act. | |||
RIS 2009-02, Rev. 1 | |||
Page 5 of 5 | |||
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT | |||
This RIS does not contain any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the | |||
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). | |||
PUBLIC PROTECTION NOTIFICATION | |||
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for | |||
information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a | |||
currently valid OMB control number. | |||
CONTACT | |||
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the | |||
appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager. | |||
Timothy J. McGinty, Director | |||
Division of Policy and Rulemaking | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Technical Contact: Matthew Hamm, NRR | |||
301-415-1472 | |||
e-mail: matthew.hamm@nrc.gov | |||
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, | |||
http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections. | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 08:06, 14 November 2019
ML091050374 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 04/01/2009 |
From: | Mcginty T Division of Policy and Rulemaking |
To: | |
Matthew Hamm | |
References | |
RIS-09-002, Rev 1 | |
Download: ML091050374 (5) | |
See also: RIS 2009-02
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001
April XX, 2009
NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2009-02, REV. 1,
USE OF CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE GASEOUS RADIOACTIVITY
MONITORS AS REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM LEAKAGE DETECTION
EQUIPMENT AT NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS
ADDRESSEES
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have permanently
ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor
vessel.
All current and potential applicants for a combined license, manufacturing license, standard
design certification, or standard design approval for a nuclear power plant under the provisions
of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 52 (10 CFR), Licenses, Certifications, and
Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.
All applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits and operating licenses under the
provisions of 10 CFR Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities.
INTENT
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this revised regulatory issue
summary (RIS) to clarify expectations regarding licensee operability determinations and
communicate the NRC plan to address the situation created when some containment
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors are unable to meet technical specification (TS)
requirements. The plan consists of integrating a streamlined license amendment process with
the use of enforcement discretion, where appropriate. This RIS requires no action or written
response on the part of an addressee. RIS 2009-02 was originally issued on January 29, 2009.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In order to meet General Design Criterion 30, "Quality of reactor coolant pressure boundary," of
Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, licensees typically include RCS leakage detection equipment in
their plant designs because the equipment can be used to detect reactor coolant pressure
boundary (RCPB) leakage. A typical RCS leakage detection system consists of a combination
of the following:
- a containment atmosphere particulate radioactivity monitoring system
- a containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring system
RIS 2009-02, Rev. 1
Page 2 of 5
- containment sump-level and sump-pump instrumentation
- containment cooler condensate monitoring instrumentation
Containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems measure RCS leakage
indirectly by detecting airborne radioactivity released from RCS leakage. Response time is the
length of time required for these monitoring systems to detect a given volume of RCS leakage.
Response time is dependant on RCS radioactivity concentration, as well as other variables. For
a given volume of leakage, with all other variables held constant, a higher RCS radioactivity
concentration will yield a shorter response time for these monitoring systems. The design
analyses for the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used in the
licensing bases for most plants typically assume a RCS radioactivity concentration
approximately equivalent to 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core. Improvements in fuel cladding
integrity and RCS chemistry controls have significantly reduced RCS radioactivity concentration
at most plants. As a result, the monitors for operating units may have longer response times
than they would with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core because the actual RCS radioactivity
concentration is less than it would be with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core.
Most plants have TS Limiting Conditions for Operation requirements for containment
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used as part of RCS leakage detection
equipment. The TS requirements for the monitoring systems response times are based on the
design analysis that is part of a plants licensing basis. Whether the monitors are operable
depends on the licensing basis and TS requirements. When the monitors are inoperable the
licensee is required to take remedial actions as permitted by their TS or to shut down the
reactor.
Information Notice (IN) 2005-24, Nonconservatism in Leakage Detection Sensitivity
(ADAMS Accession No. ML051780073), communicated the issue created by differences
between actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations to all licensees. The purpose of
IN 2005-24 was to have licensees review information related to problems with containment
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as part of RCS leakage detection equipment
and consider appropriate actions as applicable to their plants. Information Notices do not
require any action by licensees.
In September 2008, NRC inspectors at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant identified a non-cited
violation for not complying with TS requirements for RCS leakage detection equipment. In
November 2008, the licensee for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant and the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
requested exigent license amendments from the NRC after taking remedial actions as permitted
by their TS because of a concern that the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity
monitor channels of the RCS leakage detection system were inoperable.
To address the issue, licensees working through the industry-sponsored Technical
Specifications Task Force (TSTF) have attempted to create generic TS changes, model License
Amendment Requests (LARs), model safety evaluations, and model proposed
no-significant-hazards consideration determinations using the NRC TS Consolidated Line Item
Improvement Process (CLIIP). See RIS 2000-10, Consolidated Line Item Improvement
Process For Adopting Standard Technical Specifications Changes for Power Reactors
(ADAMS Accession No. ML003693442) for more information on the NRC CLIIP.
RIS 2009-02, Rev. 1
Page 3 of 5
RIS 2009-02 was originally issued on January 29, 2009. NRC received several responses and
inquiries regarding NRCs expectations with respect to operability determinations for the
containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors. Some responders incorrectly
interpreted the original RIS to mean that NRC was declaring their site specific containment
atmosphere gaseous radiation monitors to be inoperable. The NRC does not make generic
operability determinations. As stated in NRC Inspection Manual Part 9900: Technical
Guidance, Operability Determinations And Functionality Assessments For Resolution Of
Degraded Or Nonconforming Conditions Adverse To Quality Or Safety (ADAMS Accession No.
ML081360529), licensees determine operability of equipment based on their plant-specific
licensing basis.
SUMMARY OF ISSUE
Improvements in fuel cladding integrity and RCS chemistry controls result in lower RCS
radioactivity concentrations during operational activities, including situations where there is RCS
leakage. Thus, containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems which are
designed on the basis of higher assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations may not provide
accurate indication of RCS leakage in the required length of time due to the longer response
time of the monitoring system. If this occurs each licensee must determine the operability their
gaseous radioactivity monitoring system based on their plant-specific licensing basis.
The NRC considers the longer response times of the containment atmosphere gaseous
radioactivity monitors to be of very low safety significance. The monitors would still be able to
detect degradation in the RCPB long before components fail in a manner that would affect plant
safety. Additionally, plants also have multiple diverse and redundant methods available to
detect RCS leakage and to provide licensees with a means to detect significant RCPB
degradation and to take appropriate action to ensure the continued protection of public health
and safety. Finally, nuclear power plants are designed to provide adequate core cooling
following postulated loss-of-coolant accidents up to and including a break equivalent in size to
the double-ended rupture of the largest pipe in the RCS. This design feature, coupled with the
extremely low likelihood of unstable crack growth resulting in a loss-of-coolant accident, leads
the NRC to conclude that the risk significance of this issue is very low.
The NRC plans to address the issue of inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous
radioactivity monitoring systems in an integrated fashion by: (i) working with the TSTF to
develop revised generic TS for the monitoring system, and facilitating licensee implementation
of the revised generic TS through a streamlined license amendment process; and (ii) using
guidance on NRCs exercise of enforcement discretion involving inoperable containment
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems issued in EGM-09-001
(ADAMS Accession No. ML090300467).
The NRC will review the generic TS changes that the TSTF proposes for pressurized-water
reactors (PWRs) and boiling-water reactors (BWRs). If the generic TS changes are found to be
acceptable, the NRC will make the generic model LARs, model safety evaluations, and model
no-significant-hazards consideration determinations available to licensees using the NRC CLIIP.
The revised TS would clarify the licensing basis for the leakage detection system in order to
prevent further confusion in the future. Licensees are free to submit LARs for TS changes to
address the issue. If licensees make a determination that their containment atmosphere
RIS 2009-02, Rev. 1
Page 4 of 5
gaseous radioactivity monitors are operable after examining their plant-specific licensing basis,
they can choose to take no action.
On February 18, 2009, the TSTF submitted TSTF-513, Revision 1 Revise PWR Operability
Requirements and Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation and TSTF-514, Revision 0
Revise BWR Operability Requirements and Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation to the
NRC for review. Licensees are free to submit LARs to address the issue using TSTF-513 or
TSTF-514; or they can propose alternative solutions.
In certain circumstances involving inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity
monitoring systems, enforcement discretion is available. Specific guidance for this enforcement
discretion is described in EGM-09-001 (ADAMS Accession No. ML090300467) and is available
on the NRCs web site at www.nrc.gov.
BACKFIT DISCUSSION
The intent of this revised RIS is to inform addressees of the NRCs plan to address the failure of
containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as RCS leakage detection
equipment to meet TS requirements and clarify expectations regarding licensee operability
determinations.
The staff is not imposing any new positions on licensees. This revised RIS is not providing any
new regulatory positions. This revised RIS only conveys the NRCs plan to address the issue of
RCS leakage detection equipment failing to meet TS requirements because of the difference
between actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations. This revised RIS requires no
action or written response and, therefore, is not a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109, Backfitting.
Consequently, the staff did not perform a backfit analysis.
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register
because it is informational and pertains to a staff position that does not represent a departure
from current regulatory requirements and practice. However, a public meeting to discuss this
RIS was held on April 14, 2009. The meeting summary is available under ADAMS Accession
No. ML09XXXXX. The NRC intends to work with industry representatives, members of the
public, and other stakeholders in developing final guidance and in modifying related guidance
documents.
CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT
This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808)
and, therefore, is not subject to the Act.
RIS 2009-02, Rev. 1
Page 5 of 5
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT
This RIS does not contain any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
PUBLIC PROTECTION NOTIFICATION
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for
information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
CONTACT
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the
appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Timothy J. McGinty, Director
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical Contact: Matthew Hamm, NRR
301-415-1472
e-mail: matthew.hamm@nrc.gov
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site,
http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.