ML101170739: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Carrion, Robert From: Carrion, Robert Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:23 AM To: Lake, Louis  
{{#Wiki_filter:Carrion, Robert From:                       Carrion, Robert Sent:                       Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:23 AM To:                         Lake, Louis


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
SIT Sataus Call Hi Lou, From the information which Garry presented, I think that Progress has arrived at the proper conclusion with respect to the repair. I am sure that it was not what they had hoped due to the extra time required to effect the fix. I think that the way Progress has handled this entire event should be seen a big positive for its management.
SIT Sataus Call Hi Lou, From the information which Garry presented, I think that Progress has arrived at the proper conclusion with respect to the repair. I am sure that it was not what they had hoped due to the extra time required to effect the fix. I think that the way Progress has handled this entire event should be seen a big positive for its management.
Do you know the specifics for the status call? Time, etc.?Thanks, Bob}}
Do you know the specifics for the status call? Time, etc.?
: Thanks, Bob}}

Revision as of 19:22, 13 November 2019

E-Mail from Carrion to Lake, SIT Status Call
ML101170739
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/18/2009
From: Robert Carrion
NRC/RGN-II
To: Lake L
NRC/RGN-II
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0116
Download: ML101170739 (1)


Text

Carrion, Robert From: Carrion, Robert Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:23 AM To: Lake, Louis

Subject:

SIT Sataus Call Hi Lou, From the information which Garry presented, I think that Progress has arrived at the proper conclusion with respect to the repair. I am sure that it was not what they had hoped due to the extra time required to effect the fix. I think that the way Progress has handled this entire event should be seen a big positive for its management.

Do you know the specifics for the status call? Time, etc.?

Thanks, Bob