ML101620051: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.3. I'Radiological Environmental Operating Report PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The South Texas Project initiated a comprehensive pre-operational Radiological Environmental Moni-toring Program in July 1985. That program terminated on March 7, 1988, when the operational program was implemented.
{{#Wiki_filter:.3. I
The pre-operational monitoring program data forms the baseline against which operational changes are measured.Critical pathway analysis requires that samples be taken from water, air, and land environments.
    'Radiological Environmental Operating Report PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The South Texas Project initiated a comprehensive pre-operational Radiological Environmental Moni-toring Program in July 1985. That program terminated on March 7, 1988, when the operational program was implemented. The pre-operational monitoring program data forms the baseline against which operational changes are measured.
These samples are obtained to evaluate potential radiation exposure.
Critical pathway analysis requires that samples be taken from water, air, and land environments. These samples are obtained to evaluate potential radiation exposure. Sample types are based on established pathways and experience gained at other nuclear facilities. Sample locations were determined after considering site meteorology, Colorado River hydrology, local demography, and land use. Sampling locations are further evaluated and modified according to field and analysis experience. Table I at the end of this section lists the minimum sampling locations and frequency of collection.
Sample types are based on established pathways and experience gained at other nuclear facilities.
Sampling locations consist of indicator and control stations. Indicator stations are locations on or off the site that may be influenced by plant discharges during plant operation. Control stations are located beyond the measurable influence of the South Texas Project or any other nuclear facility. Although most samples analyzed are accompanied by a control sample, it should be noted that this practice is not always possible or meaningful with all sample types. Fluctuations in the concentration of radionuclides and direct radiation exposure at indicator stations are evaluated in relation to historical data and against the control stations. Indicator stations are compared with characteristics identified during the pre-operational program to monitor for radiological effects from plant operation.
Sample locations were determined after considering site meteorology, Colorado River hydrology, local demography, and land use. Sampling locations are further evaluated and modified according to field and analysis experience.
Several sample identification methods are used to implement the program. Figures 6-1 and 6-2 are maps that identify permanent sample stations. Descriptions of sample stations shown on Figure 6-1 and 6-2 are found in Table 2. Table 2 also includes additional sampling locations and media types that may-be used for additional information. Figure 6-3 illustrates the zones used when collection locations are not permanent sample stations.
Table I at the end of this section lists the minimum sampling locations and frequency of collection.
NEI GROUNDWATER PROTECTION INITIATWVE During 2006, the Nuclear Energy Institute sponsored a task force to establish consistent methods and approaches to the monitoring and reporting of information about radioactive isotopes in groundwater, the resulting program is called the NEI Groundwater Protection Initiative. In 2006 the South Texas Project participated in the task force and has implemented the recommendations from NEI 07-07 "Industry Ground Water Protection Initiative" and other industry guidance.
Sampling locations consist of indicator and control stations.
During 2005 several shallow. aquifer wells were sampled within the immediate plant grounds and had positive values that were below the EPA drinking water limit of 20,000 pCi/kg. The positive results were attributed to an underground pipe that leaked and was repaired several years ago. To monitor this tritium, several shallow aquifer test wells were added to the sampling schedule inside the protected area, the area enclosed within the security fence, during 2008. Two of the wells, between the two units, were positive and have been sampled quarterly. The concentration of one well has remained fairly constant at approximately 1,250 pCi/kg and the other has decreased from approximately 15,000 to 6,600 pCi/kg.
Indicator stations are locations on or off the site that may be influenced by plant discharges during plant operation.
Three wells that had no detectable tritium are sampled annually to determine if there is movement of       N 6-1                                       STP Nuclear Operating Company
Control stations are located beyond the measurable influence of the South Texas Project or any other nuclear facility.
 
Although most samples analyzed are accompanied by a control sample, it should be noted that this practice is not always possible or meaningful with all sample types. Fluctuations in the concentration of radionuclides and direct radiation exposure at indicator stations are evaluated in relation to historical data and against the control stations.
2008 Environmental Report Designated Sample Locations
Indicator stations are compared with characteristics identified during the pre-operational program to monitor for radiological effects from plant operation.
    -- M 4J an ~ %
Several sample identification methods are used to implement the program. Figures 6-1 and 6-2 are maps that identify permanent sample stations.
9%
Descriptions of sample stations shown on Figure 6-1 and 6-2 are found in Table 2. Table 2 also includes additional sampling locations and media types that may-be used for additional information.
H'cr 44
Figure 6-3 illustrates the zones used when collection locations are not permanent sample stations.NEI GROUNDWATER PROTECTION INITIATWVE During 2006, the Nuclear Energy Institute sponsored a task force to establish consistent methods and approaches to the monitoring and reporting of information about radioactive isotopes in groundwater, the resulting program is called the NEI Groundwater Protection Initiative.
                          ',
In 2006 the South Texas Project participated in the task force and has implemented the recommendations from NEI 07-07"Industry Ground Water Protection Initiative" and other industry guidance.During 2005 several shallow. aquifer wells were sampled within the immediate plant grounds and had positive values that were below the EPA drinking water limit of 20,000 pCi/kg. The positive results were attributed to an underground pipe that leaked and was repaired several years ago. To monitor this tritium, several shallow aquifer test wells were added to the sampling schedule inside the protected area, the area enclosed within the security fence, during 2008. Two of the wells, between the two units, were positive and have been sampled quarterly.
                              ~             -~
The concentration of one well has remained fairly constant at approximately 1,250 pCi/kg and the other has decreased from approximately 15,000 to 6,600 pCi/kg.Three wells that had no detectable tritium are sampled annually to determine if there is movement of N 6-1 STP Nuclear Operating Company 2008 Environmental Report Designated Sample Locations Fiurn A ---M 4J an ~ %9%H'cr', 44~ -~ O-fn- p --Figure 6-1 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-2 Radiological Environmental Operating Report REMP ON SITE LOCATIONS Figure 6-2 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-3 2008 Environmental Report ZONE LOCATION MAP 8&The zone station number is determined in the following manner:*The first character of the stationnumber "Z" to identify it as a zone station.*The second character is the direction coordinate numbers 1-8.*The third character is the distance from the site number 1-6.Figure 6-3 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-4 1 Radiological Environmental Operating Report the tritium in the protected area. These three wells continue to have no detectable tritium. During 2008, three additional wells were installed in the protected area near Unit I on the east side. This was sug-gested during a hydrology study due to the direction of flow of the shallow aquifer and the lack of appropriate wells to sample on the east side of the plants. The samples collected from these wells contained no detectable tritium.As discussed in previous reports, the tritium has been monitored in the shallow aquifer for several years on the south side of the Main Cooling Reservoir.
O Fiurn A -
This was predicted by models used when licensing the site, and validated with additional studies for Units 3 & 4. A site conceptual model developed in 2008 to implement the Groundwater Protection Initiative validated the original predictions of the site hydrology.
        -fn-
The models predicted that the tritium would be at the highest concentration in the shallow aquifer on the southeast side of the Main Cooling Reservoir.
        --   p Figure 6-1 STP Nuclear Operating Company               6-2
This prediction has shown to be true with the positive results from station #251 and station #235 which have been sampled for several years and is discussed later in this report. To enhance the database, shallow aquifer wells onsite were added to the environmental program in 2007. Station #259 and #258, on the west side of the Main Cooling Reser-voir, are the only wells added that had detectable tritium, and the concentrations were very low (200 to.600 pCi/kg). In the last quarter of 2008 two additional wells, #270 and #271 were installed west of the fence line near -#258ff 597W-eIff-G27-G-mhe lower shallow aquifer, and was also at a very low concentration of approximately 500 pCi/kilogram.
 
Well #271 in the upper shallow aquifer was below measurable concentrations.
Radiological Environmental Operating Report REMP ON SITE LOCATIONS Figure 6-2 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-3
This data indicates that the model used during the licensing phase appears to predict the movement of tritium in the shallow aquifer correctly.
 
-. During-2008, there-were-two-occ~urencesofwater-leakingonto-the-ground.-One-was-from a-smallU___
2008 Environmental Report ZONE LOCATION MAP 8
pipe break. The second was from a resin box overflow.
                                                                    &
These leaks were promply identifed, stopped and evaluated under site programs and procedures.
The zone station number is determined in the following manner:
Information is recorded in the Corrective Action Program database.
  *The first character of the stationnumber "Z" to identify it as a zone station.
The evaluations revealed that there was no release to an unidentified pathway, no dl -wa- -ffsii-i [dd- e -ws tnpa-h to -a ng wate or the-halffi d -and-safety of the public.ANALYSIS OF RESULTS AND TRENDS Environmental samples from areas surrounding the South Texas Project continue to indicate no signifi-cant radiological effects from plant operation.
  *The second character is the direction coordinate numbers 1-8.
Analytical values from offsite indicator sample stations continue to trend with the control stations.
  *The third character is the distance from the site number 1-6.
Onsite indicator samples continued to increase or decrease in measured values at their expected rates.Average quarterly beta activity from three onsite indicator stations and a single control station for air particulate samples have been compared historically from 1988 through 2008 (see Figure 6-4). The average of the onsite indicators trends closely with the offsite control values. The comparison illustrates that plant operations are not having an impact on air particulate activity even at the Sensitive Indicator Stations (#1, #15, and #16). These stations are located near the plant downwind from the plant, based on the prevailing wind direction.
Figure 6-3 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-4 1
The beta activity measured in the air particulate samples is from natu-ral radioactive material.
 
Gamma analysis is performed on quarterly composites of the air particulate samples to determine if any activity is from the South Texas Project. The gamma analysis revealed that it was all natural radioactivity.
Radiological Environmental Operating Report the tritium in the protected area. These three wells continue to have no detectable tritium. During 2008, three additional wells were installed in the protected area near Unit I on the east side. This was sug-gested during a hydrology study due to the direction of flow of the shallow aquifer and the lack of appropriate wells to sample on the east side of the plants. The samples collected from these wells contained no detectable tritium.
6-5 STP Nuclear Operating Company 2008 Environmental Report Direct gamma radiation is monitored in the environment by thermoluminescent dosimeters located at 40 sites. The natural direct gamma radiation varies according to location because of differences in the natural radioactive materials in the soil, its moisture content, and the vegetation cover. Figure 6-5 compares the amount of direct gamma radiation measured at the plant since the fourth quarter of 1985 for three different types of stations.
As discussed in previous reports, the tritium has been monitored in the shallow aquifer for several years on the south side of the Main Cooling Reservoir. This was predicted by models used when licensing the site, and validated with additional studies for Units 3 & 4. A site conceptual model developed in 2008 to implement the Groundwater Protection Initiative validated the original predictions of the site hydrology. The models predicted that the tritium would be at the highest concentration in the shallow aquifer on the southeast side of the Main Cooling Reservoir. This prediction has shown to be true with the positive results from station #251 and station #235 which have been sampled for several years and is discussed later in this report. To enhance the database, shallow aquifer wells onsite were added to the environmental program in 2007. Station #259 and #258, on the west side of the Main Cooling Reser-voir, are the only wells added that had detectable tritium, and the concentrations were very low (200 to
The Control Stations are greater than 10 miles from the site and are in the direction of the least prevailing winds (Stations  
        .600 pCi/kg). In the last quarter of 2008 two additional wells, #270 and #271 were installed west of the fence line near -#258ff 597W-eIff-G27-G-mhe lower shallow aquifer, and was also at a very low concentration of approximately 500 pCi/kilogram. Well #271 in the upper shallow aquifer was below measurable concentrations. This data indicates that the model used during the licensing phase appears to predict the movement of tritium in the shallow aquifer correctly.
#23 and #37). The Sensitive Indicator Stations are in the directions that the wind blows most often and are one mile from the power plants on Farm-to-Historical Comparison of Average Quarterly Beta Activity from Indicator and Control Air Samples 1988 -2008-~taio #01 #05 #16Avra 67 i~fdiators  
    -. During-2008,     there-were-two-occ~urencesofwater-leakingonto-the-ground.-One-was-from a-smallU___
~ta~tion #037 0iffeiC-ontroU Figure 6-4 Environmental Dosimeter Comparisons-Average of Indicator Stations --Average of Control Stations -Sensitive Indicator Stations 22 20 0 16 S 12 Unit #1 Criticality  
pipe break. The second was from a resin box overflow. These leaks were promply identifed, stopped and evaluated under site programs and procedures. Information is recorded in the Corrective Action Program database. The evaluations revealed that there was no release to an unidentified pathway, no ra.dio*-actiVima-ffteri dl -wa- lel*e-d -ffsii-i [dd-
-03/08188 Unit 02 Criticality  
                                                          - tnpa-h e ws-a ng   to          wate or the-halffi -and-d safety ofthe public.
-03/12/89 In IM01 1916 L987 IM198 399 199 199 199" 199I 1"94 19"9 1996 1997 I3M L9 2000 0OO1 Z002 2000 3004 2005 20 2007 200a Results by Quarter Figure 6-5 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-6 Radiological Environmental Operating Report Market Road 521 (Stations  
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS AND TRENDS Environmental samples from areas surrounding the South Texas Project continue to indicate no signifi-cant radiological effects from plant operation. Analytical values from offsite indicator sample stations continue to trend with the control stations. Onsite indicator samples continued to increase or decrease in measured values at their expected rates.
#1, #115 and #16). The Indicator Stations are the remainder of the stations excluding Stations #38, 40, and 42. The values plotted are the averages for all of the stations according to type. Figure 6-5 indicates changing conditions in the area of the individual stations.
Average quarterly beta activity from three onsite indicator stations and a single control station for air particulate samples have been compared historically from 1988 through 2008 (see Figure 6-4). The average of the onsite indicators trends closely with the offsite control values. The comparison illustrates that plant operations are not having an impact on air particulate activity even at the Sensitive Indicator Stations (#1, #15, and #16). These stations are located near the plant downwind from the plant, based on the prevailing wind direction. The beta activity measured in the air particulate samples is from natu-ral radioactive material. Gamma analysis is performed on quarterly composites of the air particulate samples to determine if any activity is from the South Texas Project. The gamma analysis revealed that it was all natural radioactivity.
The average of the Control Stations is higher than the other stations because station #23 is in an area that has a slightly.higher natural background radiation, probably due to the soil composition.
6-5                                               STP Nuclear Operating Company
The trends of Figure 6-5 Historical Comparison of Cobalt-58  
 
& Cobalt-60 in Main Cooling Reservoir Sediment 1986 -2008 Figure 6-6 Calculated Cumulative Curies of Cobalt-60 in the Main Cooling Reservoir I-L~F6O 0*ASSUMPTIONS:
2008 Environmental Report Direct gamma radiation is monitored in the environment by thermoluminescent dosimeters located at 40 sites. The natural direct gamma radiation varies according to location because of differences in the natural radioactive materials in the soil, its moisture content, and the vegetation cover. Figure 6-5 compares the amount of direct gamma radiation measured at the plant since the fourth quarter of 1985 for three different types of stations. The Control Stations are greater than 10 miles from the site and are in the direction of the least prevailing winds (Stations #23 and #37). The Sensitive Indicator Stations are in the directions that the wind blows most often and are one mile from the power plants on Farm-to-Historical Comparison of Average Quarterly Beta Activity from Indicator and Control Air Samples 1988 - 2008
                        -   ~taio
                          #01     #05         #16Avra           67         i~fdiators               ~ta~tion #037 0iffeiC-ontroU Figure 6-4 Environmental Dosimeter Comparisons
            -Average       of Indicator Stations --             Average of Control Stations -Sensitive                   Indicator Stations 22 20 0
16 S   12 Unit #1 Criticality - 03/08188             Unit 02 Criticality - 03/12/89 In IM01 1916 L987 IM198399  199199  199" 199I 1"94 19"9 1996 1997 I3M L9 2000 0OO1Z002 2000 3004 2005 20 2007 200a Results by Quarter Figure 6-5 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-6
 
Radiological Environmental Operating Report Market Road 521 (Stations #1, #115and #16). The Indicator Stations are the remainder of the stations excluding Stations #38, 40, and 42. The values plotted are the averages for all of the stations according to type. Figure 6-5 indicates changing conditions in the area of the individual stations. The average of the Control Stations is higher than the other stations because station #23 is in an area that has a slightly.
higher natural background radiation, probably due to the soil composition. The trends of Figure 6-5 Historical Comparison of Cobalt-58 & Cobalt-60 in Main Cooling Reservoir Sediment 1986 - 2008 Figure 6-6 Calculated Cumulative Curies of Cobalt-60 in the Main Cooling Reservoir I-L~F6O 0*
ASSUMPTIONS:
: i. Radioactive decay is the only mechanism for removal from the Main Cooling Reservoir.
: i. Radioactive decay is the only mechanism for removal from the Main Cooling Reservoir.
: 2. The initial time for calculating the remaining radioactivity is July I of the year released.Figure 6-7 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-7 2008 Environmental Report clearly show that the power plants are not adding to the direct radiation in the environment Bottom sediment samples are taken from the Main Cooling Reservoir each year. Figure 6-6 shows the positive results from two plant-produced radioactive materials, Cobalt-58 and Cobalt-60.
: 2. The initial time for calculating the remaining radioactivity is July I of the year released.
The Cobalt-58 and Cobalt-60 inventory in the reservoir has decreased since 1992 because of equipment installed to reduce radioactive effluents.
Figure 6-7 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-7
The amount of Cobalt-58 has decreased below levels that can be reliably detected.
 
In 2008, Cobalt-60 could not be detected in the reservoir bottom sediment samples. Figure 6-7 demonstrates the decline in the total amount of Cobalt-60 in the reservoir.
2008 Environmental Report clearly show that the power plants are not adding to the direct radiation in the environment Bottom sediment samples are taken from the Main Cooling Reservoir each year. Figure 6-6 shows the positive results from two plant-produced radioactive materials, Cobalt-58 and Cobalt-60. The Cobalt-58 and Cobalt-60 inventory in the reservoir has decreased since 1992 because of equipment installed to reduce radioactive effluents. The amount of Cobalt-58 has decreased below levels that can be reliably detected. In 2008, Cobalt-60 could not be detected in the reservoir bottom sediment samples. Figure 6-7 demonstrates the decline in the total amount of Cobalt-60 in the reservoir.
Cesium- 137 was measured in one of the Main Cooling Reservoir bottom sediment samples. However, Cesium-I 37 was present in the environment before the operation of the South Texas Project, and the sample concentrations were approximately equal to pre-operational values. The Cesium-137 measured in the Main Cooling Reservoir does not suggest an increase due to plant operation.
Cesium- 137 was measured in one of the Main Cooling Reservoir bottom sediment samples. However, Cesium-I 37 was present in the environment before the operation of the South Texas Project, and the sample concentrations were approximately equal to pre-operational values. The Cesium-137 measured in the Main Cooling Reservoir does not suggest an increase due to plant operation.
Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen and is produced during plant operation.
Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen and is produced during plant operation. Tritium produced in the reactors is a part of the water molecule. Wastewater isifeated to remove impurities before release, but ri cot-be-removebecause-it-is-cherniva-ly- atofthe-watermllecue.-Sonme-ofiet*rilui is released into the atmosphere, and the remainder is released into the Main Cooling Reservoir. The Historical Comparison of Tritium Added to and Remaining in the Main--Cbling-Resroir 1989 - 2008
Tritium produced in the reactors is a part of the water molecule.
..   .   .. 4000-.
Wastewater isifeated to remove impurities before release, but ri cot-be-removebecause-it-is-cherniva-ly-is released into the atmosphere, and the remainder is released into the Main Cooling Reservoir.
3500 3000 52500                                                                                                                       A 2000
The Historical Comparison of Tritium Added to and Remaining in the Main--Cbling-Resroir 1989 -2008.. ... 4000-.3500 3000 52500 A 2000" 1500 1000 Soo7 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 U- Tritiwn' Releasced to ithe Ma, Coofling Reservoir' Ji Tritium Measured in the Wain Cooling Reseroir Figure 6-8 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-8 Radiological Environmental Operating Report tritium escapes from the Main Cooling Reservoir by evaporation, movement into the shallow aquifer, and by percolation from the relief wells that are a part of the dike's stabilization system. Figure 6-8 shows the amount of tritium released to the Main Cooling Reservoir each year and the amount pres-ent during the last quarter of each year. This indicates that almost half of the tritium is removed from the reservoir annually.
      "   1500 1000 Soo7 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Ma, Coofling Reservoir' U-Tritiwn' Releasced to ithe                     Ji Tritium Measured in the WainCooling Reseroir Figure 6-8 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-8
Rainwater was collected and analyzed during 2008 to determine if the tritium remained in the local area- Tritium was not found in any rainwater samples.The concentration of tritium in the Main Cooling Reservoir increased in 2008, probably due to the limited rainfall and minimal makeup from the river in 2008, which normally dilutes the concentration of tritium in the Main Cooling Reservoir and the shallow aquifer surrounding it. This effect of the reduced rainfall has induced higher concentrations in the shallow aquifer wells and surface waters across the site.Historical Comparison of Tritium Activity in Reservoir Relief Wells 1990 -2008 30"_00 rg -----S 25000-t noo)- -.Maitn Coolig R -"oo f Rdkif WeI4 (oo'leM 0233 3IMam Cookmp Ro-m c Web (oo.&)i701 Figure 6-9 Historical Comparison of Tritium Activity in Surface Water 1988-2008 310000-25006 OR.oSI.Vpor.oPIa5O5Sro.
 
IW)2 O-S-i D,,-.rpio-'Off..)
Radiological Environmental Operating Report tritium escapes from the Main Cooling Reservoir by evaporation, movement into the shallow aquifer, and by percolation from the relief wells that are a part of the dike's stabilization system. Figure 6-8 shows the amount of tritium released to the Main Cooling Reservoir each year and the amount pres-ent during the last quarter of each year. This indicates that almost half of the tritium is removed from the reservoir annually. Rainwater was collected and analyzed during 2008 to determine if the tritium remained in the local area- Tritium was not found in any rainwater samples.
4005 CW_ B .(Od .o.0 121. 0a U. PRobbo S.ohlO 10-1.) 4212 IE1 B-mIh o( LA05 RoWMr.%.&O ssh( .) 0211 *Do.0 -.0-ol19 Cslhso OsolsI 5220 DM..Cl ( imtot R- -50.0 rit IM Z_ "CoohnP ýo o 4Oldie) I2n6 Figure 6-10 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-9 2008 Environmental Report Slightly increased tritium released from the plant to the Main Cooling Reservoir may have also contrib-uted. Tritium enters the sloughs and ditches of the site as runoff from the relief wells that surround the reservoir.
The concentration of tritium in the Main Cooling Reservoir increased in 2008, probably due to the limited rainfall and minimal makeup from the river in 2008, which normally dilutes the concentration of tritium in the Main Cooling Reservoir and the shallow aquifer surrounding it. This effect of the reduced rainfall has induced higher concentrations in the shallow aquifer wells and surface waters across the site.
Examples of tritium in the relief wells are shown in Figure 6-9. Relief well #238 was sampled until a more dependable relief well #701 was identified.
Historical Comparison of Tritium Activity in Reservoir Relief Wells 1990 - 2008 30"_00 S 25000 rg                                                                                 -----
The tritium concentration in eight surface wa-ter sample points for 1988 through 2008 is shown in Figure 6-10. The specific sample point locations can be found in Table 2. Tritium levels in the onsite sloughs and ditches vary due to the concentration in the reservoir and the amount of rainfall received.
                                            -t                   noo)-                                         -
The average tritium concentration in the sloughs and ditches should never equal that of the reservoir because it decays as it migrates through the dike relief well system and is also diluted by rainwater.
                                                                    .MaitnCoolig R -"oof Rdkif WeI4(oo'leM 0233 3IMam CookmpRo-m c RO*f Web (oo.&)i701 Figure 6-9 Historical Comparison of Tritium Activity in Surface Water 1988-2008 310000-25006 OR.oSI.Vpor.oPIa5O5Sro.           IW)2                           O-S-i         D,,-.rpio-'Off..) 4005 CW_ B         .(Od .o.0 121.                                   0aU. PRobboS.ohlO10-1.) 4212 IE1 B-mIho( LA05RoWMr.%.&O ssh( .) 0211                       *Do.0           Cslhso *'rvO
Tritium was identified in the shallow (ten to thirty feet deep) aquifer test well #235, approximately seventy-five yards south of the reservoir dike base during 1999. In 2008, the concentration of well#235 has remained fairly constant.
                                                                                                                              -     OsolsI 5220
Figure 6-11 indicates that the tritium concentration is increased but bounded by previous values measured in 2001. In 2008, Historical Comparison of Tritium Activity in Shallow Aquifer Ground Water samples were collected from 1997 -200S thI 1441,; 1 southeast of the Main Cool-ing Reservoir.
                                                                                                                                  .0-ol19 DM..Cl
Samples have been collected quarterly and the tritium levels have remained near that of the relief wells. The results-f th- analysis-frfmthese two shallow aquifer wells are shown in Figure 6-11. Wells-#258-and-#259_onithe-west-side-of the site have been sampled since 2006. Wells #270 and#271 were installed during the last quarter of 2008. The results are shown in Figure 6-12. The concentrations are consistent with the original model for the site and confirm there is no negative impact to the health and safety of the public or the environment.
( imtot R-   - rit      50.00*21IM        "CoohnP         Z_              oýo 4Oldie)
The drinking water onsite is pumped from deep aquifer wells and is tested quarterly to verify tritium is not present.Water from the reservoir and other surface water onsite is not used as drinking water. The'- 11 a 0 -4.... ,1.....n5*
I2n6 Figure 6-10 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-9
.-~. 4 t l3*3_ nlD-lO*n~na25 Figure 6-11 Figure 6-11 Tritium Activity in Shallow Ground Water West of the Main Cooling Reservoir 2006 -2008 sowo 4$M4 juo S 2503 1500'.0 0. .50. ,40..l0.0
 
*l,,,tJ. n-n IO, 140i ..Unil oooo~4 WoI00W.0lU
2008 Environmental Report Slightly increased tritium released from the plant to the Main Cooling Reservoir may have also contrib-uted. Tritium enters the sloughs and ditches of the site as runoff from the relief wells that surround the reservoir. Examples of tritium in the relief wells are shown in Figure 6-9. Relief well #238 was sampled until a more dependable relief well #701 was identified. The tritium concentration in eight surface wa-ter sample points for 1988 through 2008 is shown in Figure 6-10. The specific sample point locations can be found in Table 2. Tritium levels in the onsite sloughs and ditches vary due to the concentration in the reservoir and the amount of rainfall received. The average tritium concentration in the sloughs and ditches should never equal that of the reservoir because it decays as it migrates through the dike relief well system and is also diluted by rainwater.
~ 5 Mnoo.n03MW4P05
Tritium was identified in the shallow (ten to thirty feet deep) aquifer test well #235, approximately seventy-five yards south of the reservoir dike base during 1999. In 2008, the concentration of well
*fl30~ ~ ~~~mo klocW04450 0,, r6an40$) *35-Figure 6-12 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-10
#235 has remained fairly constant. Figure 6-11 indicates that the tritium concentration is increased but bounded by previous values measured in 2001. In 2008,                                     Historical Comparison of Tritium Activity in Shallow Aquifer Ground Water samples were collected from                                                               1997 - 200S thI,I*                    1441,; 1 southeast of the Main Cool-ing Reservoir. Samples have                     '-                                  11        a been collected quarterly and the tritium levels have remained near that of the relief wells. The results-f th- analysis-frfmthese two shallow aquifer wells are                       0
-P .&Radiological Environmental Operating Report maximum dose that any individual can receive from tritium in surface water is less than one millirem in a year. This is insignificant compared to the approximate 620 mrem the public receives a year from natural radioactivity in the environment and the radiation received from medical procedures.
                                                                      ....  ,1.....n5*
The current reservoir concentration is less than half the reporting level.In preparation for the construction of Units 3 & 4, approximately 20 geological test wells were installed within 200 yards of the reservoir dike on the north side. These wells were sampled as they were in-stalled and approximately half had very low levels of tritium at a fraction of the concentration of the reservoir.
4
This was expected because of their close proximity to the Main Cooling Reservoir.
                                                                                                - . ~. -
Some samples are collected and analyzed in addition to those required by our licensing documents or internal procedures.
4 t  l3*3
These samples are obtained to give additional assurance that the public and the environment are protected from any adverse effects from the plant. These samples include pasture grass, sediment samples, rain water, shallow aquifer well water, water from various ditches and sloughs onsite, and air samples near communities or other areas of interest.
_                            nlD-lO*n~na25 shown in Figure 6-11. Wells
The results of these analyses indicate that there is no detectable radiological effect on the environment by plant operation.
-#258-and-#259_onithe-west-side-of the site have been sampled since 2006. Wells #270 and                                                                                             Figure Figure 6-11
LAND USE CENSUS The Annual Land Use Census is Useeenssor Distance Location performed to (approx miles)determine if any ENE 4.5 CR 232 (Ryman Road)changes have I occurred in the ESE 3.5 Selkirk Island______location-of resi- -SE 3.5 Selkirk Island dents and the use of the land within SW 4.5 CR 386 (Corporon Road)five miles of the WSW 2.5 FM 521 South Texas-Proj WSW2.ect generating W 4.5 FM 1095 units. The infor- WNW 4.5 CR 356 (Ashby-Buckeye Road)mation is used to determine wheth- NW 4.5 CR 354 (Mondrik Road)er any changes NNW 3.5 Runnells Ranch (FM 1468)are needed in the Radiological N 3.5 Runnells Ranch (FM 1468)Environmental Monitoring Program. The census is performed by contacting area residents and local government agencies that provide the information.
#271 were installed during the last quarter of 2008. The results are shown in Figure 6-12. The                             Tritium Activity in Shallow Ground Water West of the Main Cooling Reservoir concentrations are consistent                                                         2006      - 2008 with the original model for the site and confirm there is no negative impact to the health and safety of the public or the               sowo environment.                                 4$M4 juo The drinking water onsite is               S 2503 pumped from deep aquifer                       1500' wells and is tested quarterly to verify tritium is not present.                       .0 0. .50. ,40..l0.0 Unil    oooo~
The results of the survey indicated that no changes were required.In addition, a survey is performed to verify the nearest residents within five miles of the South Texas Project generating units in each of 16 sectors. The ten sectors that have residents within five miles and the distance to the nearest residence in each sector are listed above.STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-11}}
                                                                                        *l,,,tJ.
WoI00W.0lU            ~
n-n 5
IO,    140i    ..
Mnoo.n03MW4P05 Water from the reservoir and 4
                                                                        *fl30~  ~       ~~~mo              0,,  r6an40$)
klocW04450 *35-other surface water onsite is not used as drinking water. The Figure 6-12 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-10 6-11
 
-P      .     &
Radiological Environmental Operating Report maximum dose that any individual can receive from tritium in surface water is less than one millirem in a year. This is insignificant compared to the approximate 620 mrem the public receives a year from natural radioactivity in the environment and the radiation received from medical procedures. The current reservoir concentration is less than half the reporting level.
In preparation for the construction of Units 3 & 4, approximately 20 geological test wells were installed within 200 yards of the reservoir dike on the north side. These wells were sampled as they were in-stalled and approximately half had very low levels of tritium at a fraction of the concentration of the reservoir. This was expected because of their close proximity to the Main Cooling Reservoir.
Some samples are collected and analyzed in addition to those required by our licensing documents or internal procedures. These samples are obtained to give additional assurance that the public and the environment are protected from any adverse effects from the plant. These samples include pasture grass, sediment samples, rain water, shallow aquifer well water, water from various ditches and sloughs onsite, and air samples near communities or other areas of interest. The results of these analyses indicate that there is no detectable radiological effect on the environment by plant operation.
LAND USE CENSUS The Annual Land Use Census    is Useeenssor                                  Distance                        Location performed to                                      (approx miles) determine if any                  ENE                  4.5            CR 232 (Ryman Road) changes have                                                          I occurred in the                   ESE                  3.5            Selkirk Island
______location-of             resi-    -
dents and the use                  SE                  3.5            Selkirk Island of the land within                SW                  4.5            CR 386 (Corporon Road) five miles of the                 WSW                  2.5            FM 521 South Texas-Proj                  WSW2.
ect generating                      W                  4.5            FM 1095 units. The infor-                WNW                  4.5            CR 356 (Ashby-Buckeye Road) mation is used to determine wheth-                  NW                  4.5            CR 354 (Mondrik Road) er any changes                    NNW                  3.5            Runnells Ranch (FM 1468) are needed in the Radiological                        N                  3.5           Runnells Ranch (FM 1468)
Environmental Monitoring Program. The census is performed by contacting area residents and local government agencies that provide the information. The results of the survey indicated that no changes were required.
In addition, a survey is performed to verify the nearest residents within five miles of the South Texas Project generating units in each of 16 sectors. The ten sectors that have residents within five miles and the distance to the nearest residence in each sector are listed above.
STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-11}}

Revision as of 18:11, 13 November 2019

Radiological Environmental Operating Report
ML101620051
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 06/09/2010
From:
South Texas
To:
Office of Information Services
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0209
Download: ML101620051 (11)
v • d • e


Text

.3. I

'Radiological Environmental Operating Report PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The South Texas Project initiated a comprehensive pre-operational Radiological Environmental Moni-toring Program in July 1985. That program terminated on March 7, 1988, when the operational program was implemented. The pre-operational monitoring program data forms the baseline against which operational changes are measured.

Critical pathway analysis requires that samples be taken from water, air, and land environments. These samples are obtained to evaluate potential radiation exposure. Sample types are based on established pathways and experience gained at other nuclear facilities. Sample locations were determined after considering site meteorology, Colorado River hydrology, local demography, and land use. Sampling locations are further evaluated and modified according to field and analysis experience. Table I at the end of this section lists the minimum sampling locations and frequency of collection.

Sampling locations consist of indicator and control stations. Indicator stations are locations on or off the site that may be influenced by plant discharges during plant operation. Control stations are located beyond the measurable influence of the South Texas Project or any other nuclear facility. Although most samples analyzed are accompanied by a control sample, it should be noted that this practice is not always possible or meaningful with all sample types. Fluctuations in the concentration of radionuclides and direct radiation exposure at indicator stations are evaluated in relation to historical data and against the control stations. Indicator stations are compared with characteristics identified during the pre-operational program to monitor for radiological effects from plant operation.

Several sample identification methods are used to implement the program. Figures 6-1 and 6-2 are maps that identify permanent sample stations. Descriptions of sample stations shown on Figure 6-1 and 6-2 are found in Table 2. Table 2 also includes additional sampling locations and media types that may-be used for additional information. Figure 6-3 illustrates the zones used when collection locations are not permanent sample stations.

NEI GROUNDWATER PROTECTION INITIATWVE During 2006, the Nuclear Energy Institute sponsored a task force to establish consistent methods and approaches to the monitoring and reporting of information about radioactive isotopes in groundwater, the resulting program is called the NEI Groundwater Protection Initiative. In 2006 the South Texas Project participated in the task force and has implemented the recommendations from NEI 07-07 "Industry Ground Water Protection Initiative" and other industry guidance.

During 2005 several shallow. aquifer wells were sampled within the immediate plant grounds and had positive values that were below the EPA drinking water limit of 20,000 pCi/kg. The positive results were attributed to an underground pipe that leaked and was repaired several years ago. To monitor this tritium, several shallow aquifer test wells were added to the sampling schedule inside the protected area, the area enclosed within the security fence, during 2008. Two of the wells, between the two units, were positive and have been sampled quarterly. The concentration of one well has remained fairly constant at approximately 1,250 pCi/kg and the other has decreased from approximately 15,000 to 6,600 pCi/kg.

Three wells that had no detectable tritium are sampled annually to determine if there is movement of N 6-1 STP Nuclear Operating Company

2008 Environmental Report Designated Sample Locations

-- M 4J an ~ %

9%

H'cr 44

',

~ -~

O Fiurn A -

-fn-

-- p Figure 6-1 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-2

Radiological Environmental Operating Report REMP ON SITE LOCATIONS Figure 6-2 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-3

2008 Environmental Report ZONE LOCATION MAP 8

&

The zone station number is determined in the following manner:

  • The first character of the stationnumber "Z" to identify it as a zone station.
  • The second character is the direction coordinate numbers 1-8.
  • The third character is the distance from the site number 1-6.

Figure 6-3 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-4 1

Radiological Environmental Operating Report the tritium in the protected area. These three wells continue to have no detectable tritium. During 2008, three additional wells were installed in the protected area near Unit I on the east side. This was sug-gested during a hydrology study due to the direction of flow of the shallow aquifer and the lack of appropriate wells to sample on the east side of the plants. The samples collected from these wells contained no detectable tritium.

As discussed in previous reports, the tritium has been monitored in the shallow aquifer for several years on the south side of the Main Cooling Reservoir. This was predicted by models used when licensing the site, and validated with additional studies for Units 3 & 4. A site conceptual model developed in 2008 to implement the Groundwater Protection Initiative validated the original predictions of the site hydrology. The models predicted that the tritium would be at the highest concentration in the shallow aquifer on the southeast side of the Main Cooling Reservoir. This prediction has shown to be true with the positive results from station #251 and station #235 which have been sampled for several years and is discussed later in this report. To enhance the database, shallow aquifer wells onsite were added to the environmental program in 2007. Station #259 and #258, on the west side of the Main Cooling Reser-voir, are the only wells added that had detectable tritium, and the concentrations were very low (200 to

.600 pCi/kg). In the last quarter of 2008 two additional wells, #270 and #271 were installed west of the fence line near -#258ff 597W-eIff-G27-G-mhe lower shallow aquifer, and was also at a very low concentration of approximately 500 pCi/kilogram. Well #271 in the upper shallow aquifer was below measurable concentrations. This data indicates that the model used during the licensing phase appears to predict the movement of tritium in the shallow aquifer correctly.

-. During-2008, there-were-two-occ~urencesofwater-leakingonto-the-ground.-One-was-from a-smallU___

pipe break. The second was from a resin box overflow. These leaks were promply identifed, stopped and evaluated under site programs and procedures. Information is recorded in the Corrective Action Program database. The evaluations revealed that there was no release to an unidentified pathway, no ra.dio*-actiVima-ffteri dl -wa- lel*e-d -ffsii-i [dd-

- tnpa-h e ws-a ng to wate or the-halffi -and-d safety ofthe public.

ANALYSIS OF RESULTS AND TRENDS Environmental samples from areas surrounding the South Texas Project continue to indicate no signifi-cant radiological effects from plant operation. Analytical values from offsite indicator sample stations continue to trend with the control stations. Onsite indicator samples continued to increase or decrease in measured values at their expected rates.

Average quarterly beta activity from three onsite indicator stations and a single control station for air particulate samples have been compared historically from 1988 through 2008 (see Figure 6-4). The average of the onsite indicators trends closely with the offsite control values. The comparison illustrates that plant operations are not having an impact on air particulate activity even at the Sensitive Indicator Stations (#1, #15, and #16). These stations are located near the plant downwind from the plant, based on the prevailing wind direction. The beta activity measured in the air particulate samples is from natu-ral radioactive material. Gamma analysis is performed on quarterly composites of the air particulate samples to determine if any activity is from the South Texas Project. The gamma analysis revealed that it was all natural radioactivity.

6-5 STP Nuclear Operating Company

2008 Environmental Report Direct gamma radiation is monitored in the environment by thermoluminescent dosimeters located at 40 sites. The natural direct gamma radiation varies according to location because of differences in the natural radioactive materials in the soil, its moisture content, and the vegetation cover. Figure 6-5 compares the amount of direct gamma radiation measured at the plant since the fourth quarter of 1985 for three different types of stations. The Control Stations are greater than 10 miles from the site and are in the direction of the least prevailing winds (Stations #23 and #37). The Sensitive Indicator Stations are in the directions that the wind blows most often and are one mile from the power plants on Farm-to-Historical Comparison of Average Quarterly Beta Activity from Indicator and Control Air Samples 1988 - 2008

- ~taio

  1. 01 #05 #16Avra 67 i~fdiators ~ta~tion #037 0iffeiC-ontroU Figure 6-4 Environmental Dosimeter Comparisons

-Average of Indicator Stations -- Average of Control Stations -Sensitive Indicator Stations 22 20 0

16 S 12 Unit #1 Criticality - 03/08188 Unit 02 Criticality - 03/12/89 In IM01 1916 L987 IM198399 199199 199" 199I 1"94 19"9 1996 1997 I3M L9 2000 0OO1Z002 2000 3004 2005 20 2007 200a Results by Quarter Figure 6-5 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-6

Radiological Environmental Operating Report Market Road 521 (Stations #1, #115and #16). The Indicator Stations are the remainder of the stations excluding Stations #38, 40, and 42. The values plotted are the averages for all of the stations according to type. Figure 6-5 indicates changing conditions in the area of the individual stations. The average of the Control Stations is higher than the other stations because station #23 is in an area that has a slightly.

higher natural background radiation, probably due to the soil composition. The trends of Figure 6-5 Historical Comparison of Cobalt-58 & Cobalt-60 in Main Cooling Reservoir Sediment 1986 - 2008 Figure 6-6 Calculated Cumulative Curies of Cobalt-60 in the Main Cooling Reservoir I-L~F6O 0*

ASSUMPTIONS:

i. Radioactive decay is the only mechanism for removal from the Main Cooling Reservoir.
2. The initial time for calculating the remaining radioactivity is July I of the year released.

Figure 6-7 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-7

2008 Environmental Report clearly show that the power plants are not adding to the direct radiation in the environment Bottom sediment samples are taken from the Main Cooling Reservoir each year. Figure 6-6 shows the positive results from two plant-produced radioactive materials, Cobalt-58 and Cobalt-60. The Cobalt-58 and Cobalt-60 inventory in the reservoir has decreased since 1992 because of equipment installed to reduce radioactive effluents. The amount of Cobalt-58 has decreased below levels that can be reliably detected. In 2008, Cobalt-60 could not be detected in the reservoir bottom sediment samples. Figure 6-7 demonstrates the decline in the total amount of Cobalt-60 in the reservoir.

Cesium- 137 was measured in one of the Main Cooling Reservoir bottom sediment samples. However, Cesium-I 37 was present in the environment before the operation of the South Texas Project, and the sample concentrations were approximately equal to pre-operational values. The Cesium-137 measured in the Main Cooling Reservoir does not suggest an increase due to plant operation.

Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen and is produced during plant operation. Tritium produced in the reactors is a part of the water molecule. Wastewater isifeated to remove impurities before release, but ri cot-be-removebecause-it-is-cherniva-ly- atofthe-watermllecue.-Sonme-ofiet*rilui is released into the atmosphere, and the remainder is released into the Main Cooling Reservoir. The Historical Comparison of Tritium Added to and Remaining in the Main--Cbling-Resroir 1989 - 2008

.. . .. 4000-.

3500 3000 52500 A 2000

" 1500 1000 Soo7 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Ma, Coofling Reservoir' U-Tritiwn' Releasced to ithe Ji Tritium Measured in the WainCooling Reseroir Figure 6-8 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-8

Radiological Environmental Operating Report tritium escapes from the Main Cooling Reservoir by evaporation, movement into the shallow aquifer, and by percolation from the relief wells that are a part of the dike's stabilization system. Figure 6-8 shows the amount of tritium released to the Main Cooling Reservoir each year and the amount pres-ent during the last quarter of each year. This indicates that almost half of the tritium is removed from the reservoir annually. Rainwater was collected and analyzed during 2008 to determine if the tritium remained in the local area- Tritium was not found in any rainwater samples.

The concentration of tritium in the Main Cooling Reservoir increased in 2008, probably due to the limited rainfall and minimal makeup from the river in 2008, which normally dilutes the concentration of tritium in the Main Cooling Reservoir and the shallow aquifer surrounding it. This effect of the reduced rainfall has induced higher concentrations in the shallow aquifer wells and surface waters across the site.

Historical Comparison of Tritium Activity in Reservoir Relief Wells 1990 - 2008 30"_00 S 25000 rg -----

-t noo)- -

.MaitnCoolig R -"oof Rdkif WeI4(oo'leM 0233 3IMam CookmpRo-m c RO*f Web (oo.&)i701 Figure 6-9 Historical Comparison of Tritium Activity in Surface Water 1988-2008 310000-25006 OR.oSI.Vpor.oPIa5O5Sro. IW)2 O-S-i D,,-.rpio-'Off..) 4005 CW_ B .(Od .o.0 121. 0aU. PRobboS.ohlO10-1.) 4212 IE1 B-mIho( LA05RoWMr.%.&O ssh( .) 0211 *Do.0 Cslhso *'rvO

- OsolsI 5220

.0-ol19 DM..Cl

( imtot R- - rit 50.00*21IM "CoohnP Z_ oýo 4Oldie)

I2n6 Figure 6-10 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-9

2008 Environmental Report Slightly increased tritium released from the plant to the Main Cooling Reservoir may have also contrib-uted. Tritium enters the sloughs and ditches of the site as runoff from the relief wells that surround the reservoir. Examples of tritium in the relief wells are shown in Figure 6-9. Relief well #238 was sampled until a more dependable relief well #701 was identified. The tritium concentration in eight surface wa-ter sample points for 1988 through 2008 is shown in Figure 6-10. The specific sample point locations can be found in Table 2. Tritium levels in the onsite sloughs and ditches vary due to the concentration in the reservoir and the amount of rainfall received. The average tritium concentration in the sloughs and ditches should never equal that of the reservoir because it decays as it migrates through the dike relief well system and is also diluted by rainwater.

Tritium was identified in the shallow (ten to thirty feet deep) aquifer test well #235, approximately seventy-five yards south of the reservoir dike base during 1999. In 2008, the concentration of well

  1. 235 has remained fairly constant. Figure 6-11 indicates that the tritium concentration is increased but bounded by previous values measured in 2001. In 2008, Historical Comparison of Tritium Activity in Shallow Aquifer Ground Water samples were collected from 1997 - 200S thI,I* 1441,; 1 southeast of the Main Cool-ing Reservoir. Samples have '- 11 a been collected quarterly and the tritium levels have remained near that of the relief wells. The results-f th- analysis-frfmthese two shallow aquifer wells are 0

.... ,1.....n5*

4

- . ~. -

4 t l3*3

_ nlD-lO*n~na25 shown in Figure 6-11. Wells

-#258-and-#259_onithe-west-side-of the site have been sampled since 2006. Wells #270 and Figure Figure 6-11

  1. 271 were installed during the last quarter of 2008. The results are shown in Figure 6-12. The Tritium Activity in Shallow Ground Water West of the Main Cooling Reservoir concentrations are consistent 2006 - 2008 with the original model for the site and confirm there is no negative impact to the health and safety of the public or the sowo environment. 4$M4 juo The drinking water onsite is S 2503 pumped from deep aquifer 1500' wells and is tested quarterly to verify tritium is not present. .0 0. .50. ,40..l0.0 Unil oooo~
  • l,,,tJ.

WoI00W.0lU ~

n-n 5

IO, 140i ..

Mnoo.n03MW4P05 Water from the reservoir and 4

  • fl30~ ~ ~~~mo 0,, r6an40$)

klocW04450 *35-other surface water onsite is not used as drinking water. The Figure 6-12 STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-10 6-11

-P . &

Radiological Environmental Operating Report maximum dose that any individual can receive from tritium in surface water is less than one millirem in a year. This is insignificant compared to the approximate 620 mrem the public receives a year from natural radioactivity in the environment and the radiation received from medical procedures. The current reservoir concentration is less than half the reporting level.

In preparation for the construction of Units 3 & 4, approximately 20 geological test wells were installed within 200 yards of the reservoir dike on the north side. These wells were sampled as they were in-stalled and approximately half had very low levels of tritium at a fraction of the concentration of the reservoir. This was expected because of their close proximity to the Main Cooling Reservoir.

Some samples are collected and analyzed in addition to those required by our licensing documents or internal procedures. These samples are obtained to give additional assurance that the public and the environment are protected from any adverse effects from the plant. These samples include pasture grass, sediment samples, rain water, shallow aquifer well water, water from various ditches and sloughs onsite, and air samples near communities or other areas of interest. The results of these analyses indicate that there is no detectable radiological effect on the environment by plant operation.

LAND USE CENSUS The Annual Land Use Census is Useeenssor Distance Location performed to (approx miles) determine if any ENE 4.5 CR 232 (Ryman Road) changes have I occurred in the ESE 3.5 Selkirk Island

______location-of resi- -

dents and the use SE 3.5 Selkirk Island of the land within SW 4.5 CR 386 (Corporon Road) five miles of the WSW 2.5 FM 521 South Texas-Proj WSW2.

ect generating W 4.5 FM 1095 units. The infor- WNW 4.5 CR 356 (Ashby-Buckeye Road) mation is used to determine wheth- NW 4.5 CR 354 (Mondrik Road) er any changes NNW 3.5 Runnells Ranch (FM 1468) are needed in the Radiological N 3.5 Runnells Ranch (FM 1468)

Environmental Monitoring Program. The census is performed by contacting area residents and local government agencies that provide the information. The results of the survey indicated that no changes were required.

In addition, a survey is performed to verify the nearest residents within five miles of the South Texas Project generating units in each of 16 sectors. The ten sectors that have residents within five miles and the distance to the nearest residence in each sector are listed above.

STP Nuclear Operating Company 6-11

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML101620051&oldid=2131952"