ML12170A350: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12170A350
| number = ML12170A350
| issue date = 12/31/2009
| issue date = 12/31/2009
| title = Watts Bar Reservoir Land Management Plan Errata Sheet TVA 2009
| title = Reservoir Land Management Plan Errata Sheet TVA 2009
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| addressee name = Poole J C
| addressee name = Poole J
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB
| docket = 05000391
| docket = 05000391
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1    Document Type: EIS-Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Document Project Name: Watts Bar Reservoir Land Management Plan Project Number: 2004-1 ERRATA SHEET TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR RESERVOIR LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (WBRLMP) LOUDON, MEIGS, RHEA, AND ROANE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT The subject environmental impact statement (EIS) stated that at least six parcels on Watts Bar Reservoir were affected by the December 2008 Kingston ash spill. Impacts to environmental resources and private and public property were being assessed at the time the final EIS was published. The area of these six parcels (Parcels 184, 187, 188, 189, 12-45, and 12-51) totaled about 134 acres above mean summer pool elevation. The continued appropriateness of the current allocation of these affected parcels would be reevaluated through the recovery planning process. Since the release of the final EIS, Parcel 189a was determined to include several islands (totaling 8 acres) located upstream of the spill site on the Emory River. This location was not impacted by the spill; therefore, these islands should not have been part of the affected area. Furthermore, there are three additional parcels (Parcels 185, 186, and 153) totaling 58.4 acres that were affected by the Kingston ash spill. The total revised area of the parcels impacted by the spill is 184 acres (see Table 1 below). The locations of these parcels are shown in Figure 1 below. Table 1. Parcels Affected by the Kingston Ash Spill Parcel Affected Acreage Modified Alternatives A B C Zone Acres Zone Acres Zone Acres12-45 1.6 6 1.6 6 1.6 6 1.6 12-51 1.2 6 1.2 6 1.2 6 1.2 153 40.6 7 40.6 7 40.6 7 40.6 184 28.8 7 28.8 7 28.8 7 28.8 185 4.1 4 4.1 4 4.1 4 4.1 186 13.7 3 13.7 3 13.7 3 13.7 187 56.8 4 56.8 4 56.8 4 56.8 188 25.3 3 25.3 3 25.3 3 25.3 189a 11.9¹ 4 22.2² 4 19.9 4 19.9 Total 184.0 1 Only 11.9 acres of the original Parcel 189 were affected. The remaining acreage is associated with upstream islands, and these will remain as planned under Parcel 189. The affected parcel will be referred to as 189a for future planning.  
{{#Wiki_filter:Document Type:   EIS-Administrative Record Index Field:     Final Environmental Document Project Name:     Watts Bar Reservoir Land Management Plan Project Number:   2004-1 ERRATA SHEET TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR RESERVOIR LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (WBRLMP)
² Acreage is different for No Action and Action alternatives because 2.3 acres were transferred to Parcel 159 after significant wetlands were identified.
LOUDON, MEIGS, RHEA, AND ROANE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT The subject environmental impact statement (EIS) stated that at least six parcels on Watts Bar Reservoir were affected by the December 2008 Kingston ash spill. Impacts to environmental resources and private and public property were being assessed at the time the final EIS was published. The area of these six parcels (Parcels 184, 187, 188, 189, 12-45, and 12-51) totaled about 134 acres above mean summer pool elevation. The continued appropriateness of the current allocation of these affected parcels would be reevaluated through the recovery planning process.
Since the release of the final EIS, Parcel 189a was determined to include several islands (totaling 8 acres) located upstream of the spill site on the Emory River. This location was not impacted by the spill; therefore, these islands should not have been part of the affected area.
Furthermore, there are three additional parcels (Parcels 185, 186, and 153) totaling 58.4 acres that were affected by the Kingston ash spill. The total revised area of the parcels impacted by the spill is 184 acres (see Table 1 below). The locations of these parcels are shown in Figure 1 below.
Table 1. Parcels Affected by the Kingston Ash Spill Modified Alternatives Affected                  A                     B                       C Parcel Acreage Zone     Acres     Zone       Acres       Zone       Acres 12-45                   1.6               6         1.6       6         1.6         6           1.6 12-51                   1.2               6         1.2       6         1.2         6           1.2 153                   40.6               7       40.6       7         40.6         7         40.6 184                   28.8               7       28.8       7         28.8         7         28.8 185                     4.1               4         4.1       4         4.1         4           4.1 186                   13.7               3       13.7       3         13.7         3         13.7 187                   56.8               4       56.8       4         56.8         4         56.8 188                   25.3               3       25.3       3         25.3         3         25.3 189a                   11.9¹             4       22.2²       4         19.9         4         19.9 Total                   184.0 1
Only 11.9 acres of the original Parcel 189 were affected. The remaining acreage is associated with upstream islands, and these will remain as planned under Parcel 189. The affected parcel will be referred to as 189a for future planning.
  ² Acreage is different for No Action and Action alternatives because 2.3 acres were transferred to Parcel 159 after significant wetlands were identified.
Page 1


Page 2            Figure 1. Excluded Parcels Near Kingston Fossil Plant
Figure 1. Excluded Parcels Near Kingston Fossil Plant Page 2


Page 3  On November 19, 2009, the TVA Board of Directors approved the 2009 WBRLMP, which excluded all or parts of the nine parcels mentioned above that were affected by the December 2008 Kingston ash spill. The appropriate future uses of these parcels will be determined during the recovery planning process. Because of these changes, the total acreage considered in the WBRLMP is not 16,220 acres, as reported in the EIS, but rather, 16,036 acres. This change slightly reduces the amount of land available for planning (about 1 percent), but it does not affect the planning process for the vast majority of public lands around Watts Bar Reservoir. After the release of the final EIS, the TVA Board of Directors clarified its authority regarding future requests for allocation changes of certain shoreline parcels from Zone 5 or 6 to Zone 7. The Board will reserve the right to review and approve such changes. Because the exercise of this allocation authority is an administrative action, it would have no effect on the physical environment, the planning process, or the stated goals of the WBRLMP. Most of the changes necessary to accommodate the 184-acre reduction occur in various tables throughout the document; however, some changes in the document text are necessary. An updated map of the Kingston Fossil Plant area (i.e., Figure 1 in this document) is provided. Table 2 lists the locations in the document where updates are necessary. Table 2. Errata for Watts Bar Reservoir Land Management Plan EIS Page Paragraph Line Delete: Replace with or Add:
On November 19, 2009, the TVA Board of Directors approved the 2009 WBRLMP, which excluded all or parts of the nine parcels mentioned above that were affected by the December 2008 Kingston ash spill. The appropriate future uses of these parcels will be determined during the recovery planning process. Because of these changes, the total acreage considered in the WBRLMP is not 16,220 acres, as reported in the EIS, but rather, 16,036 acres. This change slightly reduces the amount of land available for planning (about 1 percent), but it does not affect the planning process for the vast majority of public lands around Watts Bar Reservoir.
Cover Sheet Abstract: First 2 "a total of 16,220 acres" "a total of 16,036 acres" S-1 Second 4 "approximately 16,220 acres" "approximately 16,036 acres" S-3 Second 2 "about 16,220 acres" "about 16,036 acres" 1 Fourth 3 "about 16,220 acres" "about 16,036 acres" 3 First 5 "about 16,220 acres" "about 16,036 acres" 3 Third 2 "approximately 16,220 acres" "approximately 16,036 acres" 5 Second All Original Paragraph Replacement Paragraph 1 5 Third All Original Paragraph Replacement Paragraph 2 30 Second All  "without any further TVA Board approval"  "with TVA Board approval" 31 First 2 "1,552 acres" "1,549 acres" 32 Table 2.1-3 Row 46 Col. 4 "19.9" "9.0" 32 Table 2.1-3 Row 46 Col. 7 "Decrease in Acreage" "Decrease Acreage to Create Parcel 189a" 33 First 4 "about 8,900 acres" "about 8,800 acres"33 Sixth 7 "nearly 2,400 acres" "nearly 2,200 acres" 34 First 4 "3,472 acres of land" "3,433 acres of land" 34 First 5 "3,309 acres" "3,236 acres" 34 First 7 "1,998 acres" "1,995 acres" 34 Second 8 "3,780 acres of land" "3,741 acres of land" 34 Second 9 "3,857 acres" "3,784 acres" 34 Second 13 "1,552 acres" "1,549 acres" 34 Fourth 1 "2,300 acres" "2,200 acres" 34 Fourth 3 "approximately 1,400 to 1,500 acres" "approximately 1,200 to 2,100 acres" 35 Table 2.2-1 All Original Table 2.2-1 Revised Table 2.2-1 36 Table 2.2-2 All Original Table 2.2-2 Revised Table 2.2-2 72 Fifth 1 "manages 16,220 acres" "manages 16,036 acres" 78 Fourth 5 "approximately 16,220 acres" "approximately 16,036 acres" 79 Second 14 "within the 16,220 acres" "within the 16,036 acres" Page 4  Page Paragraph Line Delete: Replace with or Add: 97 First 6 "Approximately 14 percent (2,303 acres)" "Approximately 14 percent (2,241acres)" 100 Third 2 "31 percent (5,098 acres)" "31 percent (5,025 acres)" 103 Second 4 "42 percent (6,800 acres)" "42 percent (6,700 acres)" 103 Fourth 1 "53 percent (8,600 acres)" "53 percent (8,500 acres)" 103 Fourth 4 "47 percent (7,600 acres)" "47 percent (7,500 acres)" 104 Second 2 "55 percent (8,900 acres)" "55 percent (8,800 acres)" 105 Sixth 2 "management of 16,220 acres" "management of 16,036 acres" 105 Sixth 3 "land (9.5 percent) for Zone 5" "land (9.6 percent) for Zone 5" 111 Second 3 "Six thousand seven hundred eighty-one acres or 42.1 percent" "Six thousand six hundred sixty-nine acres or 41.6 percent" 111 Fourth 5 "7,637 acres, or 47 percent" "7,525 acres, or 47 percent" 112 First 1 "8,878 acres, or 55 percent" "8,766 acres, or 55 percent" 118 Fourth 2 "developed recreation (1,998 acres)" "developed recreation (1,995 acres)" 118 Sixth 2 "3,857 acres" "3,784 acres" 118 Sixth 3 "1,552 acres" "1,549 acres" 119 Second 6 "5,098 acres" "5,025 acres" 119 Second 13 "1,351 acres" "1,348 acres" 122 Table 4.8-3 All Original Table 4.8-3 Revised Table 4.8-3 123 Second 4 "1,687 acres" "1,633 acres" 124 Fourth 5 "about 381" "about 446" 124 Fourth 6 "about 446 acres" "about 548 acres" 127 Fourth 2 "367 acres" "357 acres" 129 Second 4 "1,998 acres or 12 percent" "1,995 acres or 12 percent" 129 Second 5 "1,552 acres" "1,549 acres" 129 Second 7 "1,351 acres" "1,348 acres" 130 First 2 "1,998 acres, 1,552 acres, and 1,351 acres" "1,995 acres, 1,549 acres, and 1,348 acres" 130 First 4 "3,309 acres, 3,857 acres, 5,098 acres'' "3,236 acres, 3,784 acres, 5,025 acres" 131 Table 4.11-1 All Original Table 4.11-1 Revised Table 4.11-1 132 First  1 "3,309 acres" "3,236 acres" 133 First 2 "557 acres more" "548 acres more"133 Sixth 2 "5,098 acres" "5,025 acres"136 Three 3 "450 fewer acres" "1,187 fewer acres" 136 Three 4 "1,545 acres compared to 1,072 acres" "1,544 acres compared to 357 acres"136 Sixth 1-2 "5,098 acres, as opposed to 3,857 under Modified Alternative B and 3,309" "5,025 acres, as opposed to 3,784 under Modified Alternative B and 3,236" 136 Sixth 4 "3,780 acres under Modified Alternatives B and C, and 3,472 acres" "3,741 acres under Modified Alternatives B and C, and 3,433 acres" 137 Fifth 2 "1,998 acres" "1,995 acres" 137 Fifth 5 "About 6,772 acres" "About 6,669 acres" 138 Sixth 4 "over 52 percent" "over 55 percent" 181 Table B-1, Parcel 12-45 Row 2, Col. 9 "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF." "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP." 182 Table B-1, Parcel 12-51 Row 1, Col. 9 "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF." "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP." 207 Table B-1, Parcel 153 Row 1, Col. 9  Add "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP."
After the release of the final EIS, the TVA Board of Directors clarified its authority regarding future requests for allocation changes of certain shoreline parcels from Zone 5 or 6 to Zone 7.
Page 5  Page Paragraph Line Delete: Replace with or Add: 211 Table B-1, Parcel 184 Row 8, Col. 9 "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF." "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP." 212 Table B-1, Parcel 185 Row 2, Col. 9  Add "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP." 212 Table B-1, Parcel 186 Row 3, Col. 9  Add "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP." 212 Table B-1, Parcel 187 Row 4, Col. 9 "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF." "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP." 212 Table B-1, Parcel 188 Row 5, Col. 9 "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF." "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP." 213 Table B-1, Parcel 189 Row 2, Col. 9 "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF." "Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP." 213 Table B-1 After Row 2  Add row for Parcel 189a as in revised Table B-1 Please replace the second paragraph on page 5 with the paragraph below.
The Board will reserve the right to review and approve such changes. Because the exercise of this allocation authority is an administrative action, it would have no effect on the physical environment, the planning process, or the stated goals of the WBRLMP.
Replacement Paragraph 1 All or parts of at least nine parcels (other than KIF) proposed for consideration in the Land Plan action alternatives were impacted directly by the spill. The area of these parcels total about 184.0 acres above mean summer pool elevation. Parcels186 and 188, which total 39.0 acres, were proposed for allocation to Zone 3 (Sensitive Resource Management) because of the presence of wetlands. Parcels 185, 187, and 189a, totaling 83.1 acres, were proposed for Zone 4 (Natural Resource Conservation). The 69.2 acres of Parcels 153 and 184 were proposed for Zone 7 (Shoreline Access). Parcels 12-45 and 12-51 (about 2.8 acres) are currently licensed to the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) for boat access ramps and are proposed for Zone 6 (Developed Recreation). In addition, the approximately 84-acre containment pond, which includes 60 acres from which the ash slide occurred, is part of the KIF site (Parcel 190), which is proposed to be allocated to Zone 2 (Project Operations).
Most of the changes necessary to accommodate the 184-acre reduction occur in various tables throughout the document; however, some changes in the document text are necessary. An updated map of the Kingston Fossil Plant area (i.e., Figure 1 in this document) is provided.
Table 2 lists the locations in the document where updates are necessary.
Table 2. Errata for Watts Bar Reservoir Land Management Plan EIS Page       Paragraph         Line                 Delete:               Replace with or Add:
Cover Abstract: First     2         a total of 16,220 acres         a total of 16,036 acres Sheet S-1         Second           4       approximately 16,220 acres     approximately 16,036 acres S-3         Second           2           about 16,220 acres             about 16,036 acres 1         Fourth           3           about 16,220 acres             about 16,036 acres 3           First           5           about 16,220 acres             about 16,036 acres 3           Third           2       approximately 16,220 acres     approximately 16,036 acres 5         Second         All             Original Paragraph         Replacement Paragraph 1 5           Third         All             Original Paragraph         Replacement Paragraph 2 without any further TVA Board 30          Second          All                                        with TVA Board approval approval 31           First           2                 1,552 acres                   1,549 acres Row 46 32       Table 2.1-3                             19.9                           9.0 Col. 4 Row 46                                  Decrease Acreage to Create Parcel 32       Table 2.1-3                   Decrease in Acreage Col. 7                                                   189a 33           First           4             about 8,900 acres               about 8,800 acres 33           Sixth           7             nearly 2,400 acres             nearly 2,200 acres 34           First           4           3,472 acres of land             3,433 acres of land 34           First           5                 3,309 acres                   3,236 acres 34           First           7                 1,998 acres                   1,995 acres 34         Second           8           3,780 acres of land             3,741 acres of land 34         Second           9                 3,857 acres                   3,784 acres 34         Second         13                 1,552 acres                   1,549 acres 34         Fourth           1                 2,300 acres                   2,200 acres approximately 1,400 to 1,500 34          Fourth          3                                    approximately 1,200 to 2,100 acres acres 35       Table 2.2-1       All           Original Table 2.2-1             Revised Table 2.2-1 36       Table 2.2-2       All           Original Table 2.2-2             Revised Table 2.2-2 72           Fifth           1         manages 16,220 acres           manages 16,036 acres 78         Fourth           5       approximately 16,220 acres     approximately 16,036 acres 79         Second         14         within the 16,220 acres         within the 16,036 acres Page 3


Please replace the third paragraph on page 5 with the paragraph below. Replacement Paragraph 2 In January 2009, TVA began developing a recovery plan that would address remediation of the area affected by the ash spill, including any areas within the above parcels that have been impacted. The appropriate future uses of these nine parcels will be determined during the recovery planning process. Since the vast majority of land parcels on Watts Bar Reservoir are unaffected by the spill, TVA has decided to exclude these parcels from the WBRLMP and to move ahead with the land planning process for this reservoir. Any future TVA actions to reallocate any of these parcels will be subject to environmental reviews under NEPA.
Page Paragraph    Line                    Delete:                  Replace with or Add:
Please replace Table 2-1 on page 35 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes
Approximately 14 percent (2,303          Approximately 14 percent 97    First      6 acres)                        (2,241acres) 100    Third      2          31 percent (5,098 acres)          31 percent (5,025 acres) 103  Second      4          42 percent (6,800 acres)          42 percent (6,700 acres) 103    Fourth      1          53 percent (8,600 acres)          53 percent (8,500 acres) 103    Fourth      4          47 percent (7,600 acres)          47 percent (7,500 acres) 104  Second      2           55 percent (8,900 acres)          55 percent (8,800 acres) 105    Sixth      2      management of 16,220 acres        management of 16,036 acres 105    Sixth      3        land (9.5 percent) for Zone 5      land (9.6 percent) for Zone 5 Six thousand seven hundred      Six thousand six hundred sixty-nine 111  Second      3 eighty-one acres or 42.1 percent            acres or 41.6 percent 111    Fourth      5          7,637 acres, or 47 percent        7,525 acres, or 47 percent 112    First      1          8,878 acres, or 55 percent        8,766 acres, or 55 percent developed recreation (1,998 118    Fourth      2                                        developed recreation (1,995 acres) acres) 118    Sixth      2                  3,857 acres                      3,784 acres 118    Sixth      3                  1,552 acres                      1,549 acres 119  Second      6                  5,098 acres                      5,025 acres 119  Second      13                  1,351 acres                      1,348 acres 122  Table 4.8-3  All            Original Table 4.8-3                Revised Table 4.8-3 123  Second      4                  1,687 acres                      1,633 acres 124    Fourth      5                  about 381                        about 446 124    Fourth      6               about 446 acres                    about 548 acres 127    Fourth      2                  367 acres                        357 acres 129  Second      4          1,998 acres or 12 percent          1,995 acres or 12 percent 129  Second      5                  1,552 acres                      1,549 acres 129  Second      7                  1,351 acres                      1,348 acres 1,998 acres, 1,552 acres, and  1,995 acres, 1,549 acres, and 1,348 130    First      2 1,351 acres                          acres 3,309 acres, 3,857 acres, 5,098    3,236 acres, 3,784 acres, 5,025 130    First      4 acres                            acres 131 Table 4.11-1 All            Original Table 4.11-1               Revised Table 4.11-1 132    First      1                 3,309 acres                      3,236 acres 133    First      2               557 acres more                    548 acres more 133    Sixth      2                 5,098 acres                      5,025 acres 136    Three      3              450 fewer acres                  1,187 fewer acres 1,545 acres compared to 1,072 136    Three      4                                        1,544 acres compared to 357 acres acres 5,098 acres, as opposed to 3,857    5,025 acres, as opposed to 3,784 136    Sixth    1-2    under Modified Alternative B and      under Modified Alternative B and 3,309                              3,236 3,780 acres under Modified          3,741 acres under Modified 136    Sixth      4     Alternatives B and C, and 3,472      Alternatives B and C, and 3,433 acres                              acres 137    Fifth      2                  1,998 acres                      1,995 acres 137    Fifth      5              About 6,772 acres                  About 6,669 acres 138    Sixth      4              over 52 percent                    over 55 percent Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1,  Row 2,  Affected by the December 2009 181                                                                pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 12-45 Col. 9          ash pond spill at KIF.
.
WBRLMP.
Page 6  Table 2.2-1. Comparison of Land Uses by Alternatives (Revised) Existing (1988)
Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1, Row 1,   Affected by the December 2009 182                                                                pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 12-51 Col. 9          ash pond spill at KIF.
Allocation Categories Current Land Use Zones Modified Alternatives A B C Acres % Acres % Acres % Retained Developed 1 Previously Unplanned 2 Zone 2 - Project Operations 3,587 22.4 4,371 27.3 3,611 22.5 Historic Preservation, Habitat Protection, Visual Management and Protection, Small Wild Areas Zone 3 Sensitive
WBRLMP.
Add Affected by the December 2009 Table B-1, Row 1, 207                                                            ash pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 153  Col. 9 WBRLMP.
Page 4


Resource Management 3,433 21.4 3,741 23.3 3,741 23.3 Wildlife Management Forest Management Agriculture, Open Space, Right-of-Way Protection Zone 4 - Natural Resource Conservation 3,236 20.2 3,784 23.6 5,025 31.4 Industrial Sites, Barge Terminal Sites, Minor Landings, Fleeting Area, Industrial Access    Zone 5 - Industrial  1,544 9.6 357 2.2 77 0.5 Public Recreation, Commercial Recreation
Page      Paragraph        Line                Delete:                Replace with or Add:
Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1,      Row 8,    Affected by the December 2009 211                                                                      pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 184      Col. 9        ash pond spill at KIF.
WBRLMP.
Add Affected by the December 2009 Table B-1,      Row 2, 212                                                                  ash pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 185      Col. 9 WBRLMP.
Add Affected by the December 2009 Table B-1,      Row 3, 212                                                                  ash pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 186      Col. 9 WBRLMP.
Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1,      Row 4,   Affected by the December 2009 212                                                                      pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 187      Col. 9        ash pond spill at KIF.
WBRLMP.
Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1,      Row 5,    Affected by the December 2009 212                                                                      pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 188      Col. 9        ash pond spill at KIF.
WBRLMP.
Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1,      Row 2,    Affected by the December 2009 213                                                                      pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 189      Col. 9        ash pond spill at KIF.
WBRLMP.
After                                      Add row for Parcel 189a as in 213        Table B-1 Row 2                                              revised Table B-1 Please replace the second paragraph on page 5 with the paragraph below.
Replacement Paragraph 1 All or parts of at least nine parcels (other than KIF) proposed for consideration in the Land Plan action alternatives were impacted directly by the spill. The area of these parcels total about 184.0 acres above mean summer pool elevation. Parcels186 and 188, which total 39.0 acres, were proposed for allocation to Zone 3 (Sensitive Resource Management) because of the presence of wetlands. Parcels 185, 187, and 189a, totaling 83.1 acres, were proposed for Zone 4 (Natural Resource Conservation). The 69.2 acres of Parcels 153 and 184 were proposed for Zone 7 (Shoreline Access). Parcels 12-45 and 12-51 (about 2.8 acres) are currently licensed to the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) for boat access ramps and are proposed for Zone 6 (Developed Recreation). In addition, the approximately 84-acre containment pond, which includes 60 acres from which the ash slide occurred, is part of the KIF site (Parcel 190),
which is proposed to be allocated to Zone 2 (Project Operations).
Please replace the third paragraph on page 5 with the paragraph below.
Replacement Paragraph 2 In January 2009, TVA began developing a recovery plan that would address remediation of the area affected by the ash spill, including any areas within the above parcels that have been impacted. The appropriate future uses of these nine parcels will be determined during the recovery planning process. Since the vast majority of land parcels on Watts Bar Reservoir are unaffected by the spill, TVA has decided to exclude these parcels from the WBRLMP and to move ahead with the land planning process for this reservoir. Any future TVA actions to reallocate any of these parcels will be subject to environmental reviews under NEPA.
Please replace Table 2-1 on page 35 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.
Page 5


Water Access, Informal
Table 2.2-1.        Comparison of Land Uses by Alternatives (Revised)
 
Existing (1988)                                              Modified Alternatives Current Land Allocation                                      A                    B                C Use Zones Categories                                Acres      %      Acres        %    Acres      %
Recreation Zone 6 - Developed
Retained Developed 1        Zone 2 - Project 2                          3,587    22.4      4,371      27.3    3,611    22.5 Previously Unplanned        Operations Historic Preservation, Zone 3 -
 
Habitat Protection, Sensitive Visual Management and                            3,433    21.4      3,741      23.3    3,741    23.3 Resource Protection, Small Wild Management Areas Wildlife Management Zone 4 - Natural Forest Management Resource            3,236    20.2      3,784      23.6    5,025    31.4 Agriculture, Open Space, Conservation Right-of-Way Protection Industrial Sites, Barge Terminal Sites, Minor        Zone 5 -
Recreation 1,995 12.4 1,549 9.7 1,348 8.4 Previously Unplanned 3 Zone 7 - Shoreline  
1,544      9.6      357        2.2      77      0.5 Landings, Fleeting Area,    Industrial Industrial Access Public Recreation, Zone 6 -
 
Commercial Recreation Developed            1,995     12.4     1,549       9.7   1,348     8.4 Water Access, Informal Recreation Recreation Zone 7 -
Access 2,241 14.0 2,234 13.9 2,234 13.9 Total 16,036 100.0 16,036 100.0 16,036 100.0 1 Retained development - A TWRA maintenance area (9 acres) and Kingston Pumping Station (16 acres) are the only inclusions from the 1988 Plan.
3 Previously Unplanned        Shoreline           2,241     14.0     2,234     13.9   2,234   13.9 Access Total 16,036       100.0     16,036     100.0   16,036   100.0 1
Retained development - A TWRA maintenance area (9 acres) and Kingston Pumping Station (16 acres) are the only inclusions from the 1988 Plan.
2 Primarily consists of TVA project lands from dam and electric power plant reservations.
2 Primarily consists of TVA project lands from dam and electric power plant reservations.
3 Consists of TVA lands described as marginal strip in the 1988 Plan.
3 Consists of TVA lands described as marginal strip in the 1988 Plan.
Please replace Table 2.2-2 on page 36 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes
Please replace Table 2.2-2 on page 36 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.
. Table 2.2-2. Comparison of Acres Allocated to Sensitive and Natural Resource Uses (Revised)
Table 2.2-2.       Comparison of Acres Allocated to Sensitive and Natural Resource Uses (Revised)
Modified Alternative Allocation Acres Percent of Total Area Alternative A Historic Preservation, Habitat Protection, Visual Management and Protection, Small Wild Areas, Wildlife Management, Forest Management, Agriculture, Open Space, Right-of-Way Protection 6,669 41.6 Modified Alternative B Zone 3 - Sensitive Resource Management Zone 4 - Natural Resource Conservation 7,525 46.9 Modified Alternative C Zone 3 - Sensitive Resource Management Zone 4 - Natural Resource Conservation 8,766 54.7  
Modified                                                                                         Percent of Allocation                               Acres Alternative                                                                                        Total Area Historic Preservation, Habitat Protection, Visual Management Alternative A        and Protection, Small Wild Areas, Wildlife Management, Forest         6,669      41.6 Management, Agriculture, Open Space, Right-of-Way Protection Modified          Zone 3 - Sensitive Resource Management 7,525      46.9 Alternative B       Zone 4 - Natural Resource Conservation Modified          Zone 3 - Sensitive Resource Management 8,766      54.7 Alternative C        Zone 4 - Natural Resource Conservation Page 6
 
Please replace Table 4.8-3 on page 122 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.
Table 4.8-3. Prime Farmland Acreage Potentially Affected Under Each Alternative (Revised)
Modified Alternative A                Modified Alternative B              Modified Alternative C Total                                Total                                Total Zone        Prime                                Prime                                Prime Zone    Percent                    Zone      Percent                  Zone      Percent Farmland                            Farmland                              Farmland Allocation  of Zone                  Allocation    of Zone                Allocation    of Zone (Acres)                              (Acres)                              (Acres)
(Acres)                            (Acres)                              (Acres) 2          234          3587        6.5          262        4371          6.0        244        3611          6.8 3         878          3433      25.6          889          3741        23.8        889          3741        23.8 4          590          3236      18.2          670          3784        17.7        744          5025        14.8 5          139          1544        9.0          66          357        18.5        32          77        41.6 6          278          1995      13.9          233          1549        15.0        211          1348        15.7 7          677          2241      30.2          676          2234        30.3        676          2234        30.3 Total      2796          16036      17.4        2796        16036        17.4      2796        16036        17.4 Please replace Table 4.11-1 on page 131 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.
Table 4.11-1.          Acres of Developed and Dispersed Recreation on Watts Bar Reservoir (Revised)
Modified Alternatives Existing (1988)        Current Land Allocation Categories        Use Zones                A                  B                  C Acres      %*    Acres      %      Acres        %
Wildlife Management Forest Management             Zone 4 -
Agriculture, Informal          Natural 3,236      20.2    3,784    23.6    5,025      31.4 Recreation, Open            Resource Space, Right-of-Way        Conservation Protection Public Recreation, Commercial                Zone 6 -
1,995      12.4    1,549    9.7      1,348      8.4 Recreation, Water          Recreation Access Total                      5,231      32.6    5,333    33.3    6,373      39.8
* Percent of total TVA Land on Watts Bar Reservoir Page 7


Page 7  Please replace Table 4.8-3 on page 122 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes
Please replace information after row 2 in Table B-1 on page 213 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.
. Table 4.8-3. Prime Farmland Acreage Potentially Affected Under Each Alternative (Revised)  Zone Modified Alternative A Modified Alternative B Modified Alternative C Prime Farmland (Acres) Total Zone Allocation (Acres) Percent of Zone Prime Farmland (Acres) Total Zone Allocation (Acres) Percent of Zone Prime Farmland (Acres) Total Zone Allocation (Acres) Percent of Zone 2 234 3587 6.5 262 4371 6.0 244 3611 6.8 3 878 3433 25.6 889 3741 23.8 889 3741 23.8 4 590 3236 18.2 670 3784 17.7 744 5025 14.8 5 139 1544 9.0 66 357 18.5 32 77 41.6 6 278 1995 13.9 233 1549 15.0 211 1348 15.7 7 677 2241 30.2 676 2234 30.3 676 2234 30.3 Total 2796 16036 17.4 2796 16036 17.4 2796 16036 17.4 Please replace Table 4.11-1 on page 131 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes
Table B-1 (Revised)
. Table 4.11-1. Acres of Developed and Dispersed Recreation on Watts Bar Reservoir (Revised) Existing (1988) Allocation Categories Current Land Use Zones Modified Alternatives A B C Acres %* Acres % Acres % Wildlife Management Forest Management Agriculture, Informal Recreation, Open Space, Right-of-Way Protection Zone 4 - Natural Resource Conservation 3,236 20.2 3,784 23.6 5,025 31.4 Public Recreation, Commercial Recreation, Water Access Zone 6 -  Recreation 1,995 12.4 1,549 9.7 1,348 8.4 Total  5,231 32.6 5,333 33.3 6,373 39.8
Original   Committed                    Alternative Acreage                                  Alternative Parcel         (C)/                           A       Alternatives                Alternative  Brief Description of Allocated Parcel                                Alternative                                    B Number    Uncommitted                        (No       B/C Acres                       C      Parcels A                                    (Preferred)
* Percent of total TVA Land on Watts Bar Reservoir Page 8  Please replace information after row 2 in Table B-1 on page 213 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes
(1988 Plan)      (U)                        Action)
. Table B-1 (Revised)
Includes all Zone 4 islands in the Emory River embayment upstream from Kingston Fossil Plant and contains bottomland hardwoods and shoreline fringe 189      182            U              22.2          4            9.0            4            4 wetlands of significant importance to various wading/water bird species; duck and goose hunting from blinds occurs on some of these areas.
Parcel Original Parcel Number (1988 Plan) Committed (C)/ Uncommitted (U) Acreage Alternative A Alternative A (No Action) Alternatives B/C Acres Alternative B (Preferred) Alternative C Brief Description of Allocated Parcels  189 182 U 22.2 4 9.0 4 4 Includes all Zone 4 islands in the Emory River embayment upstream from Kingston Fossil Plant and contains bottomland hardwoods and shoreline fringe wetlands of significant importance to various wading/water bird species; duck and goose hunting from blinds occurs on some of these areas. 189a 182 U 22.2 4 11.9 4 4 Includes a peninsula and islands in the Emory River near Kingston Fossil Plant and contains bottomland hardwoods and shoreline fringe wetlands of significant importance to various wading/water bird species; duck and goose hunting from blinds occurs on some of these areas. Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP.}}
Includes a peninsula and islands in the Emory River near Kingston Fossil Plant and contains bottomland hardwoods and shoreline fringe wetlands of significant importance to 189a      182            U              22.2          4          11.9            4            4      various wading/water bird species; duck and goose hunting from blinds occurs on some of these areas. Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP.
Page 8}}

Latest revision as of 03:07, 12 November 2019

Reservoir Land Management Plan Errata Sheet TVA 2009
ML12170A350
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/2009
From:
Tennessee Valley Authority
To: Justin Poole
Watts Bar Special Projects Branch
References
Download: ML12170A350 (8)


Text

Document Type: EIS-Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Document Project Name: Watts Bar Reservoir Land Management Plan Project Number: 2004-1 ERRATA SHEET TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR RESERVOIR LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (WBRLMP)

LOUDON, MEIGS, RHEA, AND ROANE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT The subject environmental impact statement (EIS) stated that at least six parcels on Watts Bar Reservoir were affected by the December 2008 Kingston ash spill. Impacts to environmental resources and private and public property were being assessed at the time the final EIS was published. The area of these six parcels (Parcels 184, 187, 188, 189, 12-45, and 12-51) totaled about 134 acres above mean summer pool elevation. The continued appropriateness of the current allocation of these affected parcels would be reevaluated through the recovery planning process.

Since the release of the final EIS, Parcel 189a was determined to include several islands (totaling 8 acres) located upstream of the spill site on the Emory River. This location was not impacted by the spill; therefore, these islands should not have been part of the affected area.

Furthermore, there are three additional parcels (Parcels 185, 186, and 153) totaling 58.4 acres that were affected by the Kingston ash spill. The total revised area of the parcels impacted by the spill is 184 acres (see Table 1 below). The locations of these parcels are shown in Figure 1 below.

Table 1. Parcels Affected by the Kingston Ash Spill Modified Alternatives Affected A B C Parcel Acreage Zone Acres Zone Acres Zone Acres 12-45 1.6 6 1.6 6 1.6 6 1.6 12-51 1.2 6 1.2 6 1.2 6 1.2 153 40.6 7 40.6 7 40.6 7 40.6 184 28.8 7 28.8 7 28.8 7 28.8 185 4.1 4 4.1 4 4.1 4 4.1 186 13.7 3 13.7 3 13.7 3 13.7 187 56.8 4 56.8 4 56.8 4 56.8 188 25.3 3 25.3 3 25.3 3 25.3 189a 11.9¹ 4 22.2² 4 19.9 4 19.9 Total 184.0 1

Only 11.9 acres of the original Parcel 189 were affected. The remaining acreage is associated with upstream islands, and these will remain as planned under Parcel 189. The affected parcel will be referred to as 189a for future planning.

² Acreage is different for No Action and Action alternatives because 2.3 acres were transferred to Parcel 159 after significant wetlands were identified.

Page 1

Figure 1. Excluded Parcels Near Kingston Fossil Plant Page 2

On November 19, 2009, the TVA Board of Directors approved the 2009 WBRLMP, which excluded all or parts of the nine parcels mentioned above that were affected by the December 2008 Kingston ash spill. The appropriate future uses of these parcels will be determined during the recovery planning process. Because of these changes, the total acreage considered in the WBRLMP is not 16,220 acres, as reported in the EIS, but rather, 16,036 acres. This change slightly reduces the amount of land available for planning (about 1 percent), but it does not affect the planning process for the vast majority of public lands around Watts Bar Reservoir.

After the release of the final EIS, the TVA Board of Directors clarified its authority regarding future requests for allocation changes of certain shoreline parcels from Zone 5 or 6 to Zone 7.

The Board will reserve the right to review and approve such changes. Because the exercise of this allocation authority is an administrative action, it would have no effect on the physical environment, the planning process, or the stated goals of the WBRLMP.

Most of the changes necessary to accommodate the 184-acre reduction occur in various tables throughout the document; however, some changes in the document text are necessary. An updated map of the Kingston Fossil Plant area (i.e., Figure 1 in this document) is provided.

Table 2 lists the locations in the document where updates are necessary.

Table 2. Errata for Watts Bar Reservoir Land Management Plan EIS Page Paragraph Line Delete: Replace with or Add:

Cover Abstract: First 2 a total of 16,220 acres a total of 16,036 acres Sheet S-1 Second 4 approximately 16,220 acres approximately 16,036 acres S-3 Second 2 about 16,220 acres about 16,036 acres 1 Fourth 3 about 16,220 acres about 16,036 acres 3 First 5 about 16,220 acres about 16,036 acres 3 Third 2 approximately 16,220 acres approximately 16,036 acres 5 Second All Original Paragraph Replacement Paragraph 1 5 Third All Original Paragraph Replacement Paragraph 2 without any further TVA Board 30 Second All with TVA Board approval approval 31 First 2 1,552 acres 1,549 acres Row 46 32 Table 2.1-3 19.9 9.0 Col. 4 Row 46 Decrease Acreage to Create Parcel 32 Table 2.1-3 Decrease in Acreage Col. 7 189a 33 First 4 about 8,900 acres about 8,800 acres 33 Sixth 7 nearly 2,400 acres nearly 2,200 acres 34 First 4 3,472 acres of land 3,433 acres of land 34 First 5 3,309 acres 3,236 acres 34 First 7 1,998 acres 1,995 acres 34 Second 8 3,780 acres of land 3,741 acres of land 34 Second 9 3,857 acres 3,784 acres 34 Second 13 1,552 acres 1,549 acres 34 Fourth 1 2,300 acres 2,200 acres approximately 1,400 to 1,500 34 Fourth 3 approximately 1,200 to 2,100 acres acres 35 Table 2.2-1 All Original Table 2.2-1 Revised Table 2.2-1 36 Table 2.2-2 All Original Table 2.2-2 Revised Table 2.2-2 72 Fifth 1 manages 16,220 acres manages 16,036 acres 78 Fourth 5 approximately 16,220 acres approximately 16,036 acres 79 Second 14 within the 16,220 acres within the 16,036 acres Page 3

Page Paragraph Line Delete: Replace with or Add:

Approximately 14 percent (2,303 Approximately 14 percent 97 First 6 acres) (2,241acres) 100 Third 2 31 percent (5,098 acres) 31 percent (5,025 acres) 103 Second 4 42 percent (6,800 acres) 42 percent (6,700 acres) 103 Fourth 1 53 percent (8,600 acres) 53 percent (8,500 acres) 103 Fourth 4 47 percent (7,600 acres) 47 percent (7,500 acres) 104 Second 2 55 percent (8,900 acres) 55 percent (8,800 acres) 105 Sixth 2 management of 16,220 acres management of 16,036 acres 105 Sixth 3 land (9.5 percent) for Zone 5 land (9.6 percent) for Zone 5 Six thousand seven hundred Six thousand six hundred sixty-nine 111 Second 3 eighty-one acres or 42.1 percent acres or 41.6 percent 111 Fourth 5 7,637 acres, or 47 percent 7,525 acres, or 47 percent 112 First 1 8,878 acres, or 55 percent 8,766 acres, or 55 percent developed recreation (1,998 118 Fourth 2 developed recreation (1,995 acres) acres) 118 Sixth 2 3,857 acres 3,784 acres 118 Sixth 3 1,552 acres 1,549 acres 119 Second 6 5,098 acres 5,025 acres 119 Second 13 1,351 acres 1,348 acres 122 Table 4.8-3 All Original Table 4.8-3 Revised Table 4.8-3 123 Second 4 1,687 acres 1,633 acres 124 Fourth 5 about 381 about 446 124 Fourth 6 about 446 acres about 548 acres 127 Fourth 2 367 acres 357 acres 129 Second 4 1,998 acres or 12 percent 1,995 acres or 12 percent 129 Second 5 1,552 acres 1,549 acres 129 Second 7 1,351 acres 1,348 acres 1,998 acres, 1,552 acres, and 1,995 acres, 1,549 acres, and 1,348 130 First 2 1,351 acres acres 3,309 acres, 3,857 acres, 5,098 3,236 acres, 3,784 acres, 5,025 130 First 4 acres acres 131 Table 4.11-1 All Original Table 4.11-1 Revised Table 4.11-1 132 First 1 3,309 acres 3,236 acres 133 First 2 557 acres more 548 acres more 133 Sixth 2 5,098 acres 5,025 acres 136 Three 3 450 fewer acres 1,187 fewer acres 1,545 acres compared to 1,072 136 Three 4 1,544 acres compared to 357 acres acres 5,098 acres, as opposed to 3,857 5,025 acres, as opposed to 3,784 136 Sixth 1-2 under Modified Alternative B and under Modified Alternative B and 3,309 3,236 3,780 acres under Modified 3,741 acres under Modified 136 Sixth 4 Alternatives B and C, and 3,472 Alternatives B and C, and 3,433 acres acres 137 Fifth 2 1,998 acres 1,995 acres 137 Fifth 5 About 6,772 acres About 6,669 acres 138 Sixth 4 over 52 percent over 55 percent Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1, Row 2, Affected by the December 2009 181 pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 12-45 Col. 9 ash pond spill at KIF.

WBRLMP.

Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1, Row 1, Affected by the December 2009 182 pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 12-51 Col. 9 ash pond spill at KIF.

WBRLMP.

Add Affected by the December 2009 Table B-1, Row 1, 207 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 153 Col. 9 WBRLMP.

Page 4

Page Paragraph Line Delete: Replace with or Add:

Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1, Row 8, Affected by the December 2009 211 pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 184 Col. 9 ash pond spill at KIF.

WBRLMP.

Add Affected by the December 2009 Table B-1, Row 2, 212 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 185 Col. 9 WBRLMP.

Add Affected by the December 2009 Table B-1, Row 3, 212 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 186 Col. 9 WBRLMP.

Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1, Row 4, Affected by the December 2009 212 pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 187 Col. 9 ash pond spill at KIF.

WBRLMP.

Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1, Row 5, Affected by the December 2009 212 pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 188 Col. 9 ash pond spill at KIF.

WBRLMP.

Affected by the December 2009 ash Table B-1, Row 2, Affected by the December 2009 213 pond spill at KIF, not part of Parcel 189 Col. 9 ash pond spill at KIF.

WBRLMP.

After Add row for Parcel 189a as in 213 Table B-1 Row 2 revised Table B-1 Please replace the second paragraph on page 5 with the paragraph below.

Replacement Paragraph 1 All or parts of at least nine parcels (other than KIF) proposed for consideration in the Land Plan action alternatives were impacted directly by the spill. The area of these parcels total about 184.0 acres above mean summer pool elevation. Parcels186 and 188, which total 39.0 acres, were proposed for allocation to Zone 3 (Sensitive Resource Management) because of the presence of wetlands. Parcels 185, 187, and 189a, totaling 83.1 acres, were proposed for Zone 4 (Natural Resource Conservation). The 69.2 acres of Parcels 153 and 184 were proposed for Zone 7 (Shoreline Access). Parcels 12-45 and 12-51 (about 2.8 acres) are currently licensed to the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) for boat access ramps and are proposed for Zone 6 (Developed Recreation). In addition, the approximately 84-acre containment pond, which includes 60 acres from which the ash slide occurred, is part of the KIF site (Parcel 190),

which is proposed to be allocated to Zone 2 (Project Operations).

Please replace the third paragraph on page 5 with the paragraph below.

Replacement Paragraph 2 In January 2009, TVA began developing a recovery plan that would address remediation of the area affected by the ash spill, including any areas within the above parcels that have been impacted. The appropriate future uses of these nine parcels will be determined during the recovery planning process. Since the vast majority of land parcels on Watts Bar Reservoir are unaffected by the spill, TVA has decided to exclude these parcels from the WBRLMP and to move ahead with the land planning process for this reservoir. Any future TVA actions to reallocate any of these parcels will be subject to environmental reviews under NEPA.

Please replace Table 2-1 on page 35 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.

Page 5

Table 2.2-1. Comparison of Land Uses by Alternatives (Revised)

Existing (1988) Modified Alternatives Current Land Allocation A B C Use Zones Categories Acres  % Acres  % Acres  %

Retained Developed 1 Zone 2 - Project 2 3,587 22.4 4,371 27.3 3,611 22.5 Previously Unplanned Operations Historic Preservation, Zone 3 -

Habitat Protection, Sensitive Visual Management and 3,433 21.4 3,741 23.3 3,741 23.3 Resource Protection, Small Wild Management Areas Wildlife Management Zone 4 - Natural Forest Management Resource 3,236 20.2 3,784 23.6 5,025 31.4 Agriculture, Open Space, Conservation Right-of-Way Protection Industrial Sites, Barge Terminal Sites, Minor Zone 5 -

1,544 9.6 357 2.2 77 0.5 Landings, Fleeting Area, Industrial Industrial Access Public Recreation, Zone 6 -

Commercial Recreation Developed 1,995 12.4 1,549 9.7 1,348 8.4 Water Access, Informal Recreation Recreation Zone 7 -

3 Previously Unplanned Shoreline 2,241 14.0 2,234 13.9 2,234 13.9 Access Total 16,036 100.0 16,036 100.0 16,036 100.0 1

Retained development - A TWRA maintenance area (9 acres) and Kingston Pumping Station (16 acres) are the only inclusions from the 1988 Plan.

2 Primarily consists of TVA project lands from dam and electric power plant reservations.

3 Consists of TVA lands described as marginal strip in the 1988 Plan.

Please replace Table 2.2-2 on page 36 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.

Table 2.2-2. Comparison of Acres Allocated to Sensitive and Natural Resource Uses (Revised)

Modified Percent of Allocation Acres Alternative Total Area Historic Preservation, Habitat Protection, Visual Management Alternative A and Protection, Small Wild Areas, Wildlife Management, Forest 6,669 41.6 Management, Agriculture, Open Space, Right-of-Way Protection Modified Zone 3 - Sensitive Resource Management 7,525 46.9 Alternative B Zone 4 - Natural Resource Conservation Modified Zone 3 - Sensitive Resource Management 8,766 54.7 Alternative C Zone 4 - Natural Resource Conservation Page 6

Please replace Table 4.8-3 on page 122 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.

Table 4.8-3. Prime Farmland Acreage Potentially Affected Under Each Alternative (Revised)

Modified Alternative A Modified Alternative B Modified Alternative C Total Total Total Zone Prime Prime Prime Zone Percent Zone Percent Zone Percent Farmland Farmland Farmland Allocation of Zone Allocation of Zone Allocation of Zone (Acres) (Acres) (Acres)

(Acres) (Acres) (Acres) 2 234 3587 6.5 262 4371 6.0 244 3611 6.8 3 878 3433 25.6 889 3741 23.8 889 3741 23.8 4 590 3236 18.2 670 3784 17.7 744 5025 14.8 5 139 1544 9.0 66 357 18.5 32 77 41.6 6 278 1995 13.9 233 1549 15.0 211 1348 15.7 7 677 2241 30.2 676 2234 30.3 676 2234 30.3 Total 2796 16036 17.4 2796 16036 17.4 2796 16036 17.4 Please replace Table 4.11-1 on page 131 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.

Table 4.11-1. Acres of Developed and Dispersed Recreation on Watts Bar Reservoir (Revised)

Modified Alternatives Existing (1988) Current Land Allocation Categories Use Zones A B C Acres  %* Acres  % Acres  %

Wildlife Management Forest Management Zone 4 -

Agriculture, Informal Natural 3,236 20.2 3,784 23.6 5,025 31.4 Recreation, Open Resource Space, Right-of-Way Conservation Protection Public Recreation, Commercial Zone 6 -

1,995 12.4 1,549 9.7 1,348 8.4 Recreation, Water Recreation Access Total 5,231 32.6 5,333 33.3 6,373 39.8

  • Percent of total TVA Land on Watts Bar Reservoir Page 7

Please replace information after row 2 in Table B-1 on page 213 with the revised table below. Revised information is shown in the dark grey boxes.

Table B-1 (Revised)

Original Committed Alternative Acreage Alternative Parcel (C)/ A Alternatives Alternative Brief Description of Allocated Parcel Alternative B Number Uncommitted (No B/C Acres C Parcels A (Preferred)

(1988 Plan) (U) Action)

Includes all Zone 4 islands in the Emory River embayment upstream from Kingston Fossil Plant and contains bottomland hardwoods and shoreline fringe 189 182 U 22.2 4 9.0 4 4 wetlands of significant importance to various wading/water bird species; duck and goose hunting from blinds occurs on some of these areas.

Includes a peninsula and islands in the Emory River near Kingston Fossil Plant and contains bottomland hardwoods and shoreline fringe wetlands of significant importance to 189a 182 U 22.2 4 11.9 4 4 various wading/water bird species; duck and goose hunting from blinds occurs on some of these areas. Affected by the December 2009 ash pond spill at KIF, not part of WBRLMP.

Page 8