ML16148A057: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000220 | | docket = 05000220 | ||
| license number = DPR-063 | | license number = DPR-063 | ||
| contact person = Mozafari B | | contact person = Mozafari B, NRR/DORL/LPL1-1, 415-2020 | ||
| case reference number = NCP-2016-010 | | case reference number = NCP-2016-010 | ||
| document type = Non-Concurrence Process | | document type = Non-Concurrence Process | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:NCP-2016-010 Section C As the NCP Approver, I have read and considered the submission from EEEB staff. Prior to discussion of the issues, I would like to acknowledge the work of the EEEB staff and recognize that it is good that they are exercising their ability to register their concerns through the NRCs non-concurrence process. | ||
Summary of Issues The EEEB staff is objecting to the issuance of the amendment to the Nine Mile Point (NMP) license to implement TSTF-425 (Risk-Informed Surveillance Frequencies). The EEEB Non-concurrence has four core objections to the proposed license amendment request (LAR): | |||
: 1. The proposed amendment would modify the NMP Technical Specifications (TSs) in a manner that doesnt meet the current licensing basis of NMP and NRC regulatory requirements. Specifically, General Design Criterion (GDC) 17, GDC 18, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3), and 10 CFR Appendix B Criterion III. | |||
: 2. The Topical Report (TR) Safety Evaluation (SE) was not reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). | |||
: 3. There are no backstops provided for the Surveillance Requirement (SR) frequencies that would be relocated to the licensee controlled document. | |||
: 4. The proposed amendment is risk-based, not risk-informed. | |||
Evaluation of Non-Concurrence The objections raised in this non-concurrence are identical to those raised by EEEB staff during the NRC review of a TSTF-425 LAR for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (NCP-2015-012). | |||
The non-concurrence, including the NRCs response to the non-concurrence is available under Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16033A197. As no new issues have been raised by the current non-concurrence, nor has additional technical justification for the issues been provided, I find that the previous resolution of the issues remains valid. Thus, the NRC staff should proceed with issuance of the LAR. | |||
NCP-2016-010 Section C As the NCP Approver, I have read and considered the submission from EEEB staff. Prior to discussion of the issues, I would like to acknowledge the work of the EEEB staff and recognize that it is good that they are exercising their ability to register their concerns through the NRCs non-concurrence process. | |||
Summary of Issues The EEEB staff is objecting to the issuance of the amendment to the Nine Mile Point (NMP) license to implement TSTF-425 (Risk-Informed Surveillance Frequencies). The EEEB Non-concurrence has four core objections to the proposed license amendment request (LAR): | |||
: 1. The proposed amendment would modify the NMP Technical Specifications (TSs) in a manner that doesnt meet the current licensing basis of NMP and NRC regulatory requirements. Specifically, General Design Criterion (GDC) 17, GDC 18, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3), and 10 CFR Appendix B Criterion III. | |||
: 2. The Topical Report (TR) Safety Evaluation (SE) was not reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). | |||
: 3. There are no backstops provided for the Surveillance Requirement (SR) frequencies that would be relocated to the licensee controlled document. | |||
: 4. The proposed amendment is risk-based, not risk-informed. | |||
Evaluation of Non-Concurrence The objections raised in this non-concurrence are identical to those raised by EEEB staff during the NRC review of a TSTF-425 LAR for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (NCP-2015-012). | |||
The non-concurrence, including the NRCs response to the non-concurrence is available under Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16033A197. As no new issues have been raised by the current non-concurrence, nor has additional technical justification for the issues been provided, I find that the previous resolution of the issues remains valid. Thus, the NRC staff should proceed with issuance of the LAR.}} |
Latest revision as of 19:29, 30 October 2019
ML16148A057 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nine Mile Point ![]() |
Issue date: | 05/18/2016 |
From: | Martinez-Navedo T, Matharu G, Roy Mathew, Sheila Ray, Som S Electrical Engineering Branch |
To: | |
Mozafari B, NRR/DORL/LPL1-1, 415-2020 | |
References | |
NCP-2016-010 | |
Download: ML16148A057 (13) | |
Text
NCP-2016-010 Section C As the NCP Approver, I have read and considered the submission from EEEB staff. Prior to discussion of the issues, I would like to acknowledge the work of the EEEB staff and recognize that it is good that they are exercising their ability to register their concerns through the NRCs non-concurrence process.
Summary of Issues The EEEB staff is objecting to the issuance of the amendment to the Nine Mile Point (NMP) license to implement TSTF-425 (Risk-Informed Surveillance Frequencies). The EEEB Non-concurrence has four core objections to the proposed license amendment request (LAR):
- 1. The proposed amendment would modify the NMP Technical Specifications (TSs) in a manner that doesnt meet the current licensing basis of NMP and NRC regulatory requirements. Specifically, General Design Criterion (GDC) 17, GDC 18, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3), and 10 CFR Appendix B Criterion III.
- 2. The Topical Report (TR) Safety Evaluation (SE) was not reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel (OGC).
- 3. There are no backstops provided for the Surveillance Requirement (SR) frequencies that would be relocated to the licensee controlled document.
- 4. The proposed amendment is risk-based, not risk-informed.
Evaluation of Non-Concurrence The objections raised in this non-concurrence are identical to those raised by EEEB staff during the NRC review of a TSTF-425 LAR for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (NCP-2015-012).
The non-concurrence, including the NRCs response to the non-concurrence is available under Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16033A197. As no new issues have been raised by the current non-concurrence, nor has additional technical justification for the issues been provided, I find that the previous resolution of the issues remains valid. Thus, the NRC staff should proceed with issuance of the LAR.
NCP-2016-010 Section C As the NCP Approver, I have read and considered the submission from EEEB staff. Prior to discussion of the issues, I would like to acknowledge the work of the EEEB staff and recognize that it is good that they are exercising their ability to register their concerns through the NRCs non-concurrence process.
Summary of Issues The EEEB staff is objecting to the issuance of the amendment to the Nine Mile Point (NMP) license to implement TSTF-425 (Risk-Informed Surveillance Frequencies). The EEEB Non-concurrence has four core objections to the proposed license amendment request (LAR):
- 1. The proposed amendment would modify the NMP Technical Specifications (TSs) in a manner that doesnt meet the current licensing basis of NMP and NRC regulatory requirements. Specifically, General Design Criterion (GDC) 17, GDC 18, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3), and 10 CFR Appendix B Criterion III.
- 2. The Topical Report (TR) Safety Evaluation (SE) was not reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel (OGC).
- 3. There are no backstops provided for the Surveillance Requirement (SR) frequencies that would be relocated to the licensee controlled document.
- 4. The proposed amendment is risk-based, not risk-informed.
Evaluation of Non-Concurrence The objections raised in this non-concurrence are identical to those raised by EEEB staff during the NRC review of a TSTF-425 LAR for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (NCP-2015-012).
The non-concurrence, including the NRCs response to the non-concurrence is available under Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16033A197. As no new issues have been raised by the current non-concurrence, nor has additional technical justification for the issues been provided, I find that the previous resolution of the issues remains valid. Thus, the NRC staff should proceed with issuance of the LAR.