ML18025A738: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18025A738
| number = ML18025A738
| issue date = 06/22/1979
| issue date = 06/22/1979
| title = Susquehanna Units 1 and 2 - Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers' Motion for Board Ruling on Revision of Preliminary Timetable
| title = Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers' Motion for Board Ruling on Revision of Preliminary Timetable
| author name = Lemanowicz I
| author name = Lemanowicz I
| author affiliation = Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers
| author affiliation = Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:In the Mat ter of UNITED STATES'F AMERICA NUCL'EAR REGULATORY COlmISSION ale/P1 PENNSYLVANIA PO"KR AND LIGHT CO.ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.(Berwick Atom1c Power Plant)(Susquehanna Unit,s 1 and.2)DOCKET Nos.50-387 50-388 CITIZENS AGAINST NUCLEAR DANGERS'OTION FOR BOARD RULING ON REVISION OF PRELL~IINARY TI'%TABLE The citizens of the Berwick area, since the Three Mile Island d1saster, are Justifiably alarmed over the poss1ble consequences of a similar type accident occurring at the Pennsylvania Power and Light Company'Berwick atomic power plant sometime in the future.The problems of TMI will wot go away.It can never be business-as-usual aga1n for the atomic industry anywhere in the Susquehanna Valley.Therefore, a meaningful updating of the schedule for this NRC Docket case is definitely now in order.;fhereas, in the first place, the intervencrs uere never presented the preliminary timetable, in uriting or otherwise, for their imput or concurrence, by the".,other part1es prior to its adoption;Vhereas, some of the affected parties do not, appear to be responding to the present timetable anyway;Mhereas, the United States Congress is presently considering a six months, or possibly longer, moratorium on the 11censing of commercial r eactor s by the NRC, in the aftermath of TMI;Mhereas, reacting to this threat of congressional action, the NRC, on i~'.ay 21, 1979, declared an informal 90 day'uspension on some licensing proceedings
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES'F AMERICA NUCL'EAR REGULATORY COlmISSION In the    Mat ter  of                      ale/P1 PENNSYLVANIA PO"KR AND LIGHT CO.                                 DOCKET      Nos. 50-387 ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.                                               50-388 (Berwick Atom1c Power Plant)
'because of the Three Mile island disaster;  
(Susquehanna       Unit,s 1 and. 2 )
'Thereas, on May 21, 1979, the NRC Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Harold N.Denton, outlined a staf f reorganization that will delay so-called=routine casework and the issuance of operating licenses;and will almost, totally stop the processing of other li cen se application s for.several months;Sfhereas, during this period of suspended animation, the NRC/Lesson Learned Task Force will"recommend changes to licensing requirement,s and the licensing process for nuclear power plants based on the lessons learned." This Task Force will, in due course, notify the licensing boards and the intervening parties of"all new information
CITIZENS AGAINST NUCLEAR     DANGERS'OTION FOR BOARD RULING ON REVISION OF PRELL~IINARY TI'%TABLE The citizens of the Berwick area, since the Three Mile Island d1saster, are Justifiably alarmed over the poss1ble consequences of a similar type accident occurring at the Pennsylvania Power and Light Company'       Berwick atomic power plant sometime in the future. The problems of TMI       will wot go away. It can never be business-as-usual aga1n     for the atomic industry     anywhere   in the               Susquehanna Valley.
'developed," from their study.of TÃI,"which may be relevant and material to any of the issues being adJudicated in presently pending cases.")lhereas, on June lg, 1979, the NRC Division of ProJect I~management at Bethesda, Nd.conferred with the Applicants, and all other utilities having operating license applications, to esta'olish"priorities for the review of those applicat,ions," presumably, among other things, to r'evise their timetables in the aftermath of TNI, and the NRC response to congressional pressure and public reaction;Therefore, it would be prudent, and reasonable for the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to promugate an order revising the preliminary timetable in the Berwick case to coincide with TNI developments and t,he forthcoming NRC Task Force recommendat,ions.
Therefore,       a meaningful updating of the schedule for                   this NRC Docket case   is definitely   now in order.
CaccTIFICATE OF SEFVTICE I hereby certify that copies of Citizens A ainst Nuclear Dan ers'otion For Board Rulin On Revision Of Prelimina Timetable have been-served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, this AP-day of June, 1979.Charles Bechhoe f er, Esq., Cha i rman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mashington,'O.C.20555 Mr.Glenn 0.Bright Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S.Nuclear-Regulatory Commission Mashington, O.C.20555 Or.Oscar H.Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, O.C.20555 James M.Cutchin, IV, Esquire Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 Jay Silberg, Esq.Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N.W.Washington, D.C.20036 Dr.Judith H.Johnsrud Co-Director Environmental Coalition on Nuclear Power 433 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16801 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Comoission Mashington, D.C.20555 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S.-Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mashington, D.C.20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Hoard Panel U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 l<<r Harold N.Denton, Director Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Comm.washington, D.C.20555 Mr.Thomas M.Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection Department of Environmental Resources Commonwealth of Pennsylvania P.O.Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17120 Hs.Colleen Marsh Box 538A, R084 Mountain Top, PA 18707 0 Susquehanna Environmental Advocates c/o Gerald Schultz, Esq.500 South River Street Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702~~g5s 7S>0 gc goc jcc6 Irene Lemanowicz Chairperson}}
        ;fhereas,   in the first place, the intervencrs uere never presented the preliminary timetable, in uriting or otherwise, for their imput or concurrence, by the".,other part1es prior to its adoption; Vhereas, some of the affected parties do not, appear to be responding to the present timetable anyway; Mhereas, the United States Congress is presently considering a six months, or possibly longer, moratorium on the 11censing of commercial r eactor s by the NRC, in the aftermath of TMI; Mhereas, reacting to this threat of congressional action, the NRC, on i~'.ay 21, 1979, declared an informal 90 day'uspension on some licensing proceedings 'because of the Three Mile island disaster;
 
      'Thereas, on May 21, 1979, the NRC Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Harold N. Denton, outlined a staf f reorganization that will delay so-called =routine casework and the issuance of operating licenses; and will almost, totally stop the processing of other li cen se application s for .several months; Sfhereas, during this period of suspended animation, the NRC
                                                                /
Lesson Learned Task Force will "recommend changes to licensing requirement,s and the licensing process for nuclear power plants based on the lessons learned." This Task Force will, in due course, notify the licensing boards and the intervening parties of "all new information 'developed," from their study. of T&#xc3;I, "which may be relevant and material to any of the issues being adJudicated in presently pending cases."
      )lhereas, on June lg, 1979, the NRC Division of ProJect I~management at Bethesda, Nd. conferred with the Applicants, and all other utilities having operating license applications, to esta'olish "priorities for the review of those applicat,ions," presumably, among other things, to r'evise their timetables in the aftermath of TNI, and the NRC response to congressional pressure and public reaction; Therefore, it would be prudent, and reasonable for the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to promugate an order revising the preliminary timetable in the Berwick case to coincide with TNI developments and t,he forthcoming NRC Task Force recommendat,ions.
 
CaccTIFICATE OF SEFVTICE I hereby certify       that copies of Citizens       A ainst Nuclear     Dan ers'otion For Board Rulin       On Revision Of Prelimina             Timetable have been- served on the       following by deposit in the United States mail,   first   class, this AP-day of June, 1979.
f Charles Bechhoe er, Esq., Cha i rman James M. Cutchin, IV, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing                   Office of the Executive Legal Board Panel Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission             U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mashington, 'O.C. 20555                       Washington, D. C.           20555 Mr. Glenn 0. Bright                          Jay Silberg, Esq.
Atomic Safety  and Licensing                  Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Board Panel                                    Trowbridge U.S. Nuclear- Regulatory Commission            1800 M Street, N.W.
Mashington, O.C. 20555                        Washington,     D.C. 20036 Or. Oscar H. Paris                            Dr. Judith H. Johnsrud Atomic Safety and Licensing                  Co-Director Board Panel                                Environmental Coalition on U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission              Nuclear Power Washington, O.C. 20555                        433 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16801 Atomic Safety and Licensing                   Mr. Thomas M. Gerusky, Director Board Panel Bureau of Radiation Protection U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comoission           Department of Environmental Mashington, D.C. 20555                           Resources Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Docketing and Service Section               P.O. Box 2063 Office of the Secretary                     Harrisburg,    PA  17120 U.S.-Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mashington, D.C. 20555 Hs. Colleen Marsh Box 538A, R084 Atomic Safety and Licensing                   Mountain Top, PA 18707 Appeal Hoard Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                                   7S>
Washington, D.C. 20555               l                                       0              ~~g5s Susquehanna    Environmental Advocates                                0 gc
<<r Harold   N. Denton,   Director           c/o Gerald Schultz, Esq.                    goc jcc6 Nuclear Reactor Regulation                     500 South River Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.                 Wilkes-Barre,    PA  18702 washington, D.C.       20555 Irene Lemanowicz Chairperson}}

Latest revision as of 01:39, 22 October 2019

Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers' Motion for Board Ruling on Revision of Preliminary Timetable
ML18025A738
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/22/1979
From: Lemanowicz I
Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML18025A738 (3)


Text

UNITED STATES'F AMERICA NUCL'EAR REGULATORY COlmISSION In the Mat ter of ale/P1 PENNSYLVANIA PO"KR AND LIGHT CO. DOCKET Nos. 50-387 ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. 50-388 (Berwick Atom1c Power Plant)

(Susquehanna Unit,s 1 and. 2 )

CITIZENS AGAINST NUCLEAR DANGERS'OTION FOR BOARD RULING ON REVISION OF PRELL~IINARY TI'%TABLE The citizens of the Berwick area, since the Three Mile Island d1saster, are Justifiably alarmed over the poss1ble consequences of a similar type accident occurring at the Pennsylvania Power and Light Company' Berwick atomic power plant sometime in the future. The problems of TMI will wot go away. It can never be business-as-usual aga1n for the atomic industry anywhere in the Susquehanna Valley.

Therefore, a meaningful updating of the schedule for this NRC Docket case is definitely now in order.

fhereas, in the first place, the intervencrs uere never presented the preliminary timetable, in uriting or otherwise, for their imput or concurrence, by the".,other part1es prior to its adoption; Vhereas, some of the affected parties do not, appear to be responding to the present timetable anyway; Mhereas, the United States Congress is presently considering a six months, or possibly longer, moratorium on the 11censing of commercial r eactor s by the NRC, in the aftermath of TMI; Mhereas, reacting to this threat of congressional action, the NRC, on i~'.ay 21, 1979, declared an informal 90 day'uspension on some licensing proceedings 'because of the Three Mile island disaster;

'Thereas, on May 21, 1979, the NRC Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Harold N. Denton, outlined a staf f reorganization that will delay so-called =routine casework and the issuance of operating licenses; and will almost, totally stop the processing of other li cen se application s for .several months; Sfhereas, during this period of suspended animation, the NRC

/

Lesson Learned Task Force will "recommend changes to licensing requirement,s and the licensing process for nuclear power plants based on the lessons learned." This Task Force will, in due course, notify the licensing boards and the intervening parties of "all new information 'developed," from their study. of TÃI, "which may be relevant and material to any of the issues being adJudicated in presently pending cases."

)lhereas, on June lg, 1979, the NRC Division of ProJect I~management at Bethesda, Nd. conferred with the Applicants, and all other utilities having operating license applications, to esta'olish "priorities for the review of those applicat,ions," presumably, among other things, to r'evise their timetables in the aftermath of TNI, and the NRC response to congressional pressure and public reaction; Therefore, it would be prudent, and reasonable for the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to promugate an order revising the preliminary timetable in the Berwick case to coincide with TNI developments and t,he forthcoming NRC Task Force recommendat,ions.

CaccTIFICATE OF SEFVTICE I hereby certify that copies of Citizens A ainst Nuclear Dan ers'otion For Board Rulin On Revision Of Prelimina Timetable have been- served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, this AP-day of June, 1979.

f Charles Bechhoe er, Esq., Cha i rman James M. Cutchin, IV, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Executive Legal Board Panel Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mashington, 'O.C. 20555 Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. Glenn 0. Bright Jay Silberg, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Board Panel Trowbridge U.S. Nuclear- Regulatory Commission 1800 M Street, N.W.

Mashington, O.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20036 Or. Oscar H. Paris Dr. Judith H. Johnsrud Atomic Safety and Licensing Co-Director Board Panel Environmental Coalition on U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Power Washington, O.C. 20555 433 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16801 Atomic Safety and Licensing Mr. Thomas M. Gerusky, Director Board Panel Bureau of Radiation Protection U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comoission Department of Environmental Mashington, D.C. 20555 Resources Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Docketing and Service Section P.O. Box 2063 Office of the Secretary Harrisburg, PA 17120 U.S.-Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mashington, D.C. 20555 Hs. Colleen Marsh Box 538A, R084 Atomic Safety and Licensing Mountain Top, PA 18707 Appeal Hoard Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7S>

Washington, D.C. 20555 l 0 ~~g5s Susquehanna Environmental Advocates 0 gc

<<r Harold N. Denton, Director c/o Gerald Schultz, Esq. goc jcc6 Nuclear Reactor Regulation 500 South River Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm. Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702 washington, D.C. 20555 Irene Lemanowicz Chairperson